preceded with a * indicates the amp is in transmit mode. If
so, something is pulling the KEY line to ground.
73
Bob, K4TAX
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 17:36:48 -0400
From:
To:
Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 Question
Message-ID:<001001d7349a$f0a01570$d1e04050$@gmail.com>
Content-Type
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 5:02 PM wrote:
>
> "When I engage OPER the input signal is attenuated by ~20 dB."
>
> Thanks to all for the prompt and informative replies. Apparently the culprit
> has been found. Several reported the exact same issue, one as recently as
> one week ago. According to one
Point taken.
FWIW: This "known failure" tech comment was in 2018.
Jim - WS6X
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021, 8:33 PM KENT TRIMBLE wrote:
> Just because a tech says it's a known failure today doesn't mean it's
> been a known failure throughout its production run.
Just because a tech says it's a known failure today doesn't mean it's
been a known failure throughout its production run. Component
availability and sourcing necessarily change over the years. A robust
component from a former supplier ten years ago may not be as robust from
a different
"When I engage OPER the input signal is attenuated by ~20 dB."
Thanks to all for the prompt and informative replies. Apparently the culprit
has been found. Several reported the exact same issue, one as recently as
one week ago. According to one reply, an Elecraft Tech told him, "This is a
known
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Question
Is the key line indication on all the time? This may be indicative of a
stuck key line. There was an unsoldered resistor on mine causing the issue.
73,
Mark
W7MLG
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021, 2:38 PM wrote:
> I just purchased a used KPA500 (SN 0456) f
Hi Jim,
Sounds like an issue with the T/R circuit, you'll find some reports in
the history of this list. I had a very similar case just one week ago -
in my case it was R7 which was blown. The original type seems to be a
51 Ohm (type 1206 SMD) resistor - I've used now two 100 Ohm 1/4 watt
Is the key line indication on all the time? This may be indicative of a
stuck key line. There was an unsoldered resistor on mine causing the issue.
73,
Mark
W7MLG
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021, 2:38 PM wrote:
> I just purchased a used KPA500 (SN 0456) from a close friend. The amp was
> just back to
" When I engage OPER the input signal is attenuated by ~20 dB."
I can detect no difference in received signal between OPER and STBY. This was
for an "on air" test. I did not test with a signal generator.
Andy, k3wyc
__
Elecraft
I just purchased a used KPA500 (SN 0456) from a close friend. The amp was
just back to the factory for several repairs and was thoroughly tested. The
report reads, "KPA500 #0456 meets or exceeds all factory specifications." My
friend unboxed the amp and made several QSOs to be sure all issues were
What is your antenna like on 20 meters? Sounds more like antenna than amp.
Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill
> On Dec 18, 2016, at 6:08 AM, Joe Hutchens AJ8MH-Radio
> wrote:
>
> This is a question I've been wanting to ask...
>
> I've had a KPA500 for 4 years and
I have the same 'issue' on 20m my SWR on the hustler 6BTV is 1.4but when I
operate on that band the internal temperature seems to risemuch faster than
other bands and I eventually get a fault.
On 40m I have similar SWR on the digital frequencies and there I don't havean
issue what so ever. I
My antenna is a TA-33-M-WARC. It's flat around 14.150, but goes up fast
as you head toward .350.
I have an FT-950 and FTDX-3000, and both need increased drive to get me
to 500 watts. More concerned about the fault at 1.4:1. Although the two
could be related. Anyway, the auto tuner handles
I think requiring a different drive level is normal for most amplifiers.
The K3S is the only transceiver that I have owned where the output can be
set differently for each band, which is wonderful. My KPA-500 is pretty
tolerant of SWR 2:1 or less however that may depend on the load type. What
is
Joe,
The gain of any amplifier will not be constant across all bands.
If you are driving with the K3, there is a per band power setting so you
can compensate. See page 27 of the K3 manual.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 12/18/2016 6:08 AM, Joe Hutchens AJ8MH-Radio wrote:
This is a question I've been
This is a question I've been wanting to ask...
I've had a KPA500 for 4 years and I've noticed that 20 meters requires
more drive. Most bands require 30 watts or less, but 20 requires 35-37
for 500 watts out. In the phone portion of 20, an SWR of 1.4:1 WILL
cause a fault. It's just real
I wish I could say it works for me. It isn't a com port issue as those are
solid (I know what I am doing with RS232 and windows).
If I power off the AC power of the amp and then turn it on remotely it
doesn't work. It 'will' work after about 10-15 tries to wake it up.
So, to summarize:
KPA500
Mike;
I guess you didn’t get the email I sent yesterday asking for more information
from you about this topic. You might want to recheck for that email, there was
a lot of good information in it.
Please send me detailed info about your setup, with specifics on the ACC
connections and the data
Hi Michael,
From the way you are describing things, I would suspect you have a problem
somewhere other than the KPA500.
With my remote setup:
RS232, straight serial, no USB-to-serial
KPA500,
KPA500 software (not the utility), are you using this software? Here's a
link, scroll down about
Well,
I figured it out. It seems very fussy when you run it at PC baud rate of
19200. Once I changed it back to 38400 by connecting to the amp with
PUTTY, it seems much better behaved. On the initial first tests, on and
off work as advertised.
Mike va3mw
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 4:49 PM,
I have just installed my KPA500 on my remote base and I noticed that it is
possible to turn it off via the computer or via just dropping the AC power
and not getting it to come back on.
This makes is sort of a challenge for remote operating.
Is this normal operation or did I miss something
How are you controlling the amp? I used the utility program (via TeamViewer
when remote) and that works fine. Occasionally they get out of sync, you have
to exit the program, then restart it to be able to turn the power back on, but
that isn't common.
Rick, WA6NHC
iPad = small keypad =
Original message
From: Michael Walker va...@portcredit.net
Date: 25/05/2014 16:37 (GMT-05:00)
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 question 2 - remote power control
I have just installed my KPA500 on my remote base and I noticed that it is
possible
Tom got it for me.
Sorry, I wasn't clear that I was using the utility already and it is clear he
has had the same issues.
The remote power on with the utility on a locally attached computer does work,
but it is finicky.
You'd think with the current age of everything be handle over rs232,
Original message
From: Mike va3mw va...@portcredit.net
Date: 25/05/2014 20:20 (GMT-05:00)
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question 2 - remote power control
Tom got it for me.
Sorry, I wasn't clear that I was using the utility already
For those who might be interested, I do have a ICOM PW-1, a SS 160-
6m, 1KW+ output PA, for sale. It will operate similarly to the
KPA500 and KAT500 combo, with automatic band changing and auto
antenna tuning, with its own built in ATU. The unit can be located
remotely and controlled by
Hello everyone!
I'm a proud owner of a new K3/P3.
Almost there...
Can someone please explain to me the rationale behind the KPA500? Why 500W?
Is there a tremendous difference between legal limit and about half of it
(which is what i hear KPA500 can do)?
I understand the ease of use, how the amp
Slava,
I have the KPA-500 and an AL-1200 amp.
The KPA-500 is used most of the time. When your working dx all you want
to do is get through one time. The KPA-500 does that perfectly for me.
Its so easy to bounce around from band to band chasing dx with the
K3/P3/KAT-500/KPA-500 combo as
Hi Slava,
I would guess that it is the first 500 watt rule... The first 500 watts
is the best 500 watts you will ever use... That and the entire device
is a lot cheaper to make, plus smaller...
--
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net
for MixW
Is there a tremendous difference between legal limit and about half of it
One third, not a half. The KPA is 500W. Legal limit is 1500W.
Gary
--
http://ag0n.net
3055: http://ag0n.net/irlp/3055
NodeOp Help Page: http://ag0n.net/irlp
On 5/7/2014 7:15 AM, AG0N-3055 wrote:
One third, not a half. The KPA is 500W. Legal limit is 1500W.
Actually, I've been told that in final test at the factory, all KPA500's
make at least 600W before they go out the door. Like much of what
Elecraft does, the advertised spec is conservative.
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of David
Cole
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 6:13 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question
Hi Slava,
I would guess that it is the first 500 watt rule... The first 500 watts
I have found this to be true as well.
73
Steve KL7SB
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim
Brown
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 6:33 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question
On 5/7/2014 7:15 AM, AG0N
About the same as going from a dipole to a two element beam
Chas
- Original Message -
From: AG0N-3055 mcduf...@ag0n.net
To: sla...@nullserv.com; elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question
Is there a tremendous
The difference is .10Log1500/500..
George, W6GF
On Wednesday, May 7, 2014 7:37 AM, AG0N-3055 mcduf...@ag0n.net wrote:
Is there a tremendous difference between legal limit and about half of it
One third, not a half. The KPA is 500W. Legal limit
Increasing power from:
100W to 600W provides 7.8dB gain (1.3 S-units)
600W to 1.5KW provides 4 dB gain (0.67 S-unit)
... so that first 600W is huge.
Considering the tight integration w/ the K3 and KAT500, and the fact that
it also plays nicely w/ other transceivers, I think the KPA500 provides
Thanks for all the replies, gentlemen!
Certainly gives me food for thought.
I do want the kpa500. I love building Elecraft kits.
One more question: is there a tuner inside that amp? How does it auto-tune? And
if so - does that mean that I will have 3 tuners? KAT3, KAT500 and whatever
tuner is
As someone said in another thread, adding an amp is like going from a
dipole to a small beam. But, remember that adding a better antenna
usually costs less and provides a two-way improvement - your amp can
boost your transmit signal, but does nothing to boost the received
signal. An antenna
There is no tuner in the amp. Need for KAT500 depends on your antenna(s). If
they are resonant and reasonably wide-band you may get away without it. How
does K3 play with your antenna(s)?
KAT3 is bypassed with KAT500
Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill
On May 7, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Slava
Slava; There is no tuner inside the KPA500---that's why the KAT500 came about;
it is optional to the amp.
As for it being a must have I would say that depends on your antennas and
operating habits. If you have resonant antennas on the bands you operate you
can easily get by without the
W2RMS wrote:
One more question: is there a tuner inside that amp? How does it auto-tune? And
if so \
- does that mean that I will have 3 tuners? KAT3, KAT500 and whatever tuner is
in the \
amp? And also, is KAT500 pretty much a must?
There is no antenna tuner inside the KPA500. Auto-tune
All this bantering is getting me wanting the KPA more and more.
From: d...@lightstream.net d...@lightstream.net
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2014 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question
Increasing power from:
100W to 600W
07, 2014 12:48 PM
To: d...@lightstream.net; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question
All this bantering is getting me wanting the KPA more and more.
From: d...@lightstream.net d...@lightstream.net
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent
Exactly! The K-Line amounts to a fully automated (no tuning or knob
twisting) 500 Watt HF station. Last time I saw that was a Halicrafters
Tornado.
I changed my entire radio desk to create more storage and shelves from
the space formerly used by a large tube amp and the large tuner I used
Yeah, it's pretty easy to forgo that amp and just put up a small beam
for 40-80-160...
An amp helps you be heard no matter what kind of antenna you have. I
worked 220 countries with a home brew G5RV about 15-20 feet off the
ground because I had an amp and couldn't put up a better antenna. If
-
From: Bill W2BLC w2...@nycap.rr.com
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question
Exactly! The K-Line amounts to a fully automated (no tuning or knob
twisting) 500 Watt HF station. Last time I saw that was a Halicrafters
.
Ted, KN1CBR
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 08:06:42 -0400
From: Slava Baytalskiy sla...@nullserv.com
To: elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 question
Message-ID: ddb19b1b-36a7-4c80-ac5b-821bd5ebb...@nullserv.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hello
: Slava Baytalskiy sla...@nullserv.com
To: elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 question
Message-ID: ddb19b1b-36a7-4c80-ac5b-821bd5ebb...@nullserv.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hello everyone!
I'm a proud owner of a new K3/P3.
Almost there...
Can someone
k3ICH
- Original Message - From: Bill W2BLC w2...@nycap.rr.com
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question
Exactly! The K-Line amounts to a fully automated (no tuning or knob
twisting) 500 Watt HF station. Last time I
it directly
with the KX3 at 12 watts out (no ALC).
73, Charlie k3ICH
- Original Message - From: Bill W2BLC w2...@nycap.rr.com
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question
Exactly! The K-Line amounts to a fully automated
(no ALC).
73, Charlie k3ICH
- Original Message - From: Bill W2BLC w2...@nycap.rr.com
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question
Exactly! The K-Line amounts to a fully automated (no tuning or knob
twisting) 500
:39:00 -0400
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question about cooling
I do a lot of meteor scatter on 6 meters, and I've tried the tuner both above
and below the amp.
I've found the KPA500 runs cooler with the KAT500 tuner below the amp.
73 de Sebastian, W4AS
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Richard Gillingham
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 8:31 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question about cooling
Yes.
The very first statement under Installation in the KPA500 owner's manual is
the following:
IMPORTANT
Of Richard Gillingham
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 8:31 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question about cooling
Yes.
The very first statement under Installation in the KPA500 owner's manual is
the following:
IMPORTANT: Provide at least 2 inches (5 cm) clearance behind
On Mon, 27 May 2013 09:31:23 -0400, Richard Gillingham wrote:
IMPORTANT: Provide at least 2 inches (5 cm) clearance behind the
fan and above the amplifier for proper air flow.
Nuf said.
Roger that! And yes, the fan makes PLENTY of noise when it kicks up to
high speed. It isn't enough
clearance.
73 Ron AC7AC
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Richard Gillingham
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 6:31 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question about cooling
Yes.
The very first
in the manual. Maybe
we'll see a change soon.
73
Gil, W1RG
From: r...@cobi.biz
To: w...@hotmail.com; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] KPA500 question about cooling
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 08:03:34 -0700
Aha. You caught something that needs fixing Gil. I'm not an Elecraft
Those who know something about fluid dynamics can also tell you that if
the air flow is restricted, the fan speed will be a bit higher (for any
given KPA500 selected fan speed) - it is because the fan is not doing as
much work to move air.
Try an experiment with any fan - partially block the
Is it necessary that the top of the amp be unblocked? I was thinking of
the KAT500 being placed on top of the amp. Perhaps the other way around
would be better? Any side clearances required?
I am designing a new radio desk that will house my K3, P3, and yet to be
purchased amp and tuner.
On Sun, 26 May 2013 16:40:48 -0400, Bill wrote:
Is it necessary that the top of the amp be unblocked? I was thinking of
the KAT500 being placed on top of the amp. Perhaps the other way around
would be better? Any side clearances required?
You'll find out when you build the KPA that the top
...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bill
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 1:41 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 question about cooling
Is it necessary that the top of the amp be unblocked? I was thinking of the
KAT500 being placed on top
On Sun, 26 May 2013 15:06:25 -0700, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
The KAT500 may be placed on TOP or under the KPA500.
I wouldn't put it on top. I can hear fan and air changes if I get within a half
inch of the intake slots with my hand at higher speeds. You can feel the air
flow considerably at
, 2013 3:23 PM
To: elecraft
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question about cooling
On Sun, 26 May 2013 15:06:25 -0700, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
The KAT500 may be placed on TOP or under the KPA500.
I wouldn't put it on top. I can hear fan and air changes if I get within a
half inch of the intake
If you put the KAT500 above the amp the fans run more often, but are able to
keep the amp cool enough for most normal uses. K6XX did test this early on
with thermometers. It comes up to fan temp more quickly, but settles at the
same temp. I have mine above the amp, but the amp can also be
On 26 May 2013, at 4:47 PM, mcduf...@ag0n.net wrote:
On Sun, 26 May 2013 16:40:48 -0400, Bill wrote:
Is it necessary that the top of the amp be unblocked? I was thinking of
the KAT500 being placed on top of the amp. Perhaps the other way around
would be better? Any side clearances
I do a lot of meteor scatter on 6 meters, and I've tried the tuner both above
and below the amp.
I've found the KPA500 runs cooler with the KAT500 tuner below the amp.
73 de Sebastian, W4AS
On May 26, 2013, at 6:23 PM, mcduf...@ag0n.net wrote:
On Sun, 26 May 2013 15:06:25 -0700, Ron D'Eau
The issue I was having with the BAND CHANGE parameter has been resolved
with KPA500 test load V1.16.
__
Hi Jack... Thanks for the reply.
Yes, RADIO has been set to BCD since I put the AMP online today. The
band changes just fine under the control of the FT-950, so the amp is
getting
I just finished building the KPA500 and have it interfaced to my Yaesu
FT-950. The KPA500 follows the 950 band changes and keys fine.
However, I have changed menu item Band Change to STBY from NOR
which should automatically switch the amp to STBY from OPER after a band
change. Is this option
Make sure you set the menu parameter RADIO to BCD. The Band Change parameter
should work just fine with the Yaesu.
Let me know if you continue to have problems with this.
Jack Brindle, W6FB
Elecraft Engineering
On Sep 8, 2012, at 5:46 PM, Joe Hutchens aj8mh-ra...@charter.net wrote:
I just
Hi Jack... Thanks for the reply.
Yes, RADIO has been set to BCD since I put the AMP online today. The
band changes just fine under the control of the FT-950, so the amp is
getting the correct info. I checked to make sure the amp changed with
each band selected on the FT-950. It's just when
I have a question for the KPA500 owners:
I've been reading through the manuals and exchanging some emails with
Elecraft support over whether or not a directly connected KPA500 amp can be
turned ON/OFF in concert with the K3 it's connected to. It appears this
capability doesn't exist however
HI Gary,
This was discussed recently. See:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/macro-to-control-KPA500-td7240517.html#a7243817
73,
~iain / N6ML
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Gary n6...@cox.net wrote:
I have a question for the KPA500 owners:
I've been reading through the manuals
This is the first semi-official news we have received on the KAT500 in some
time. Originally, I believe a design target was the same size as the P3, not
the K3 or KPA500. I wonder if the new case dimensions actually contain a
larger volume than the P3 box? A low-profile design with the same
Thanks for the news about the KAT500. But it says in the KPA500 Owner's
Manual (yes, I do read manuals!):
IMPORTANT: Provide at least 2 inches (5 cm) clearance behind the fan and
above the amplifier for proper air flow.
This may hold true – to a lesser extent – for the K3...
How come the KAT500
When the tuner comes out will it be internal to the KPA500 or will it be an
outboard unit like the P3? I am getting ready to order a KPA500 and want to
know if I should wait. If the tuner is inside the KPA case I will wait and
order it all at once but if it is an outboard unit then it makes no
The KAT500 is external to the KPA500. It will have the same footprint
as the KPA500 and K3, but is very low profile and will sit nicely on top
of either unit.
73,
Lyle KK7P
When the tuner comes out will it be internal to the KPA500 or will it be an
outboard unit...
I have never had the problems you guys have described with the OPER and STBY
power settings on my KPA500 #119.
What do they say at Elecraft Support when you ask them? Have you ever talked
with anyone at Elecraft about this?
Thanks for ending the thread.
73,
Tom
Amateur Radio Operator N5GE
I occasionally saw this problem in earlier KPA firmware. It seemed
intermittant and I was unsure if it was me or the firmware that was causing
this - sounds like it was the firmware. I'm currently testing the latest
1.11 and don't see the problem at all. Be patient - I think the latest
Many thanks to Fred, K6DGW, Paul, NF8J, Frank,W6NEK, and Tom, W1TXT, who
responded to my post regarding this problem.
They have all concurred that the K3 does not retain the dual power settings
correctly when KPA500 MENU: BAND CHG is set to STBY.
I'm now confident that Elecraft will fix this
@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Question re the K3s per band power control
Yes, that much works here too.
What doesn't work is setting the KPA500 MENU: BAND CHG to STBY and
expecting that the power out from the K3 will reliably switch to higher
this for me
with their setup? How about it W4TV?
73, John, W2GW
- Original Message -
From: D Joyced_jo...@sympatico.ca
To: Elecraft Listelecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Question re the K3s per band power control
Just
support.
73, John, W2GW
- Original Message -
From: Nels Anderson n...@flightsim.com
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Question re the K3s per band power control
I reported this same issue way back in May when I first got my
I remember reading a post by someone at Elecraft (can't remember who it was)
saying it was a timing problem (well, call it a bug if you like) which would
be solved in the next FW release.
Someone wrote on this reflector he already had pre-beta release 1.11 and no
problem.
Let be patient!
73
-
Make sure that you turned on the Aux Bus
in the KPA menu.
73,
Ken K3IU
On 8/12/2011 11:41 PM, D Joyce wrote:
Group: I'm checking out a recently completed KPA500 (#234) running FW V1.11
with a K3/10 running FW Ver 4.36. The K3/100 with which it will eventually
be used is otherwise tied up
And... make sure the K3 CONFIG:PWR SET
is on Per Band.
Does the KPA500 really have Firmware
version 1.11???
73, Ken K3IU
On 8/13/2011 6:42 AM, Ken Wagner K3IU
wrote:
Make sure that you turned on the Aux
Bus in the KPA menu.
73,
Ken K3IU
On 8/12/2011
Ken,
All good points and must be done to take full advantage of the KPA's
capabilities. The V1.11 threw me too. I have been communicating with
Elecraft on a separate issue on the K3/PR6/KPA compatibility and they have
noted the highest (Non Released) Version is 1.09. I even checked earlier
it to work properly.
Many thanks to all, and 73,
John, W2GW
- Original Message -
From: D Joyce d_jo...@sympatico.ca
To: Elecraft List elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 11:41 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 Question re the K3s per band power control
Group: I'm
I notice the same thing. I would love to have VFO B show the K3 power
out when I change bands. Right now KPA500 and OPERATE of STANDBY
are spelled out. They could be abbreviated leaving room for the actual
power my K3 is going to make the first time I press the key. I'm always
wary that
for the KPA500 beta
firmware directory?
73, John, W2GW
- Original Message -
From: Fred Jensen k6...@foothill.net
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Question re the K3s per band power control
I notice the same thing. I would love
- Original Message -
From: D Joyce d_jo...@sympatico.ca
To: Elecraft List elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 11:41 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 Question re the K3s per band power control
Group: I'm checking out a recently completed KPA500 (#234) running FW
V1.11
this for me
with their setup? How about it W4TV?
73, John, W2GW
- Original Message -
From: D Joyce d_jo...@sympatico.ca
To: Elecraft List elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Question re the K3s per band power control
Just to bring
Group: I'm checking out a recently completed KPA500 (#234) running FW V1.11
with a K3/10 running FW Ver 4.36. The K3/100 with which it will eventually be
used is otherwise tied up and I wanted to confirm the the per-band power
control feature when used with the K3. (I'm using the AUX
.. and, by the way, the per-band power settings are set and stored in
the K3, not the KPA500.
73,
~iain / N6ML
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:
Stored in EEPROM - no need for a battery.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 8/7/2011 1:25 PM, r miles wrote:
Had
Had mine 2 months love it. Curious abt. one thing. Programed the
barefoot/amp setting for all bands. My question is about the memory for
that function. Not had power failure of the mains yet. Is the setting
stored in a battery back- uped internal memory? I found no mention of
an internal
Stored in EEPROM - no need for a battery.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 8/7/2011 1:25 PM, r miles wrote:
Had mine 2 months love it. Curious abt. one thing. Programed the
barefoot/amp setting for all bands. My question is about the memory for
that function. Not had power failure of the mains yet. Is the
Only my 2nd day using it. Operation manual on page 8, item 4 under
transmitting says you can have two power settings per band. One at any
power you want one to drive the amp at the proper level. Assuming the
radio is a K3. Which it is in my case. OK how is this done? I can't find
any
Hi r,
See the K3 firmware release notes:
http://www.elecraft.com/K3/k3_software.htm
You need to have version 4.36, the accessory cable in place between
the K3 and KPA-500, and CONFIG:PWR SET = PEr bAnd.
73,
~iain / N6ML
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 6:57 PM, r miles greenacres...@charter.net
This feature is automatic if you have a K3 with firmware 4.35 or later and
the KPA500AUX cable connected, or equivalent. The K3 will store its power
level with the KPA500 in Operate mode and an independent value when not in
Operate mode, i.e., Standby or power off.
Ed - W0YK
K9IL asked:
Only
Correct ... more complete than my parallel reply.
Ed - W0YK
Iain, N6ML, wrote:
See the K3 firmware release notes:
http://www.elecraft.com/K3/k3_software.htm
You need to have version 4.36, the accessory cable in place
between the K3 and KPA-500, and CONFIG:PWR SET = PEr bAnd.
This is done at the K3 so it's described in the K3 instructions. If you
haven't already, you need to install Firmware 4.36 in your K3, and you'll
find details for the new setting in the release notes with the firmware.
Ron AC7AC
-Original Message-
Only my 2nd day using it. Operation
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo