number 05466247
From: Kevin J Harris <kevin.3.har...@jci.com>
Sent: 04 May 2018 18:00
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Product Safety Testing and Evaluation training.
Hello
I am looking recommendations for companies (preferably in North America) that
can provide training in pr
to your category and class
of equipment after classroom discussions covering the physics of test standard
requirements.
Brian
From: John Allen [mailto:jral...@productsafetyinc.com]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2018 10:57 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Product Safety Testing
Hi Kevin,
The Product Safety Engineering Society (PSES) is having our annual Symposium
this month. Many Product Safety and Certification subjects are on the program.
Including a 62368-1 Open forum with the guys that created it, implemented it
and use it daily!!
Here's the link - http
recommendations for companies (preferably in North
America) that can provide training in product safety testing and
evaluation to engineers who are beginning their career.
Ideally the training would concentrate on IEC 62368-1
Kind regards
Kevin
Hello
I am looking recommendations for companies (preferably in North America) that
can provide training in product safety testing and evaluation to engineers who
are beginning their career.
Ideally the training would concentrate on IEC 62368-1
Kind regards
Kevin
Pete Perkins said:
"Historically, the HV impulse tests applied are safety tests."
Safety-wise, HV tests of safeguard insulations are to determine that the
safeguard insulations will withstand the normally-occurring transient
voltages that occur on the mains circuits. I wou
(combo and
ring).
Peter Tarver
From: Scott Aldous
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 08:33
Hi James,
The UL safety standard for PV inverters, UL 1741, makes normative reference to
IEEE 1547 and IEEE 1547.1 in Section 46. IEEE 1547.1, in clause 5.5 on
interconnection integrity, makes normative
t properly operates when it
should. Expect more such testing. You can search for the recent paper I did
with students where we were able to ‘trick’ the GFCI into tripping when it
shouldn’t; ‘nuisance’ tripping in action.
Historically, the HV impulse tests applied are safety tests. These tests w
Hi James,
The UL safety standard for PV inverters, UL 1741, makes normative reference
to IEEE 1547 and IEEE 1547.1 in Section 46. IEEE 1547.1, in clause 5.5 on
interconnection integrity, makes normative reference to IEEE C37.90.2,
which has test requirements for withstand capability to radiated
rick' the GFCI into
tripping when it shouldn't; 'nuisance' tripping in action.
Historically, the HV impulse tests applied are safety tests.
These tests were given to the EMC lab engineers as the safety engineers, in
those days, didn't provide much lab availability or experi
Hello all,
Thanks for all the interesting replies, much appreciated.
All the best
James
From: Gert Gremmen; ce-test <g.grem...@cetest.nl>
Sent: 21 March 2018 11:07
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EMC tests called up in Safety standards
The EMC tests as
Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2018-03-21 11:07, Gert Gremmen; ce-test wrote:
The EMC tests as called out in 60335 are safety tests, contrary to
those called out under the EMCD that are functional tests only. For
Europe , one can discuss about
The EMC tests as called out in 60335 are safety tests, contrary to
those called out under the EMCD that are functional tests only. For
Europe , one can discuss about the necessity of those tests, as the
EMCD requires testing in all operating modes including OFF or standby
and as long as one
regards,
Bernd
Von: James Pawson (U3C) [mailto:ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. März 2018 10:28
An: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Betreff: [PSES] EMC tests called up in Safety standards
Hello experts,
I note that EN 60335-1 (household and similar appliances) specifically calls
One would normally expect immunity to be covered in a product-family
performance standard applying to the whole family, which would be a TC59
publication in this case. But such a standard does not exist; however
there is a product-family safety standard applying to the whole family,
which
an see why this would be a
concern.
A couple of questions / thoughts:
* It sounds like this at least doubles the amount of immunity testing
required - one with the EUT "on" and one with it "off". Would that be how
you read this?
* Are there any other safety
Hi,
We’re looking for a battery safety expert to join us on a project. They need
to be very current on high performance lithium-ion packs as the current best
practices lead the standards a bit.
Please contact me directly.
Best Regards,
John
John Allen
Product Safety Consulting, Inc
labs don’t question when no EP
in most cases (both EMC and safety labs - both client cases we are even talking
top tier safety test labs).
Second as mentioned earlier a Risk Analysis needs to be done as part of the
manufacturers test plan (the mfr knows their product better than any test
informative) that following information
should be present as suggested minimum test plan content)_
__
3 Description of the BASIC SAFETY and ESSENTIALPERFORMANCE including a
description how the BASIC SAFETY and ESSENTIAL PERFORMANCE will be
monitored against the pass/fail criteria during each
of a test plan.
Annex G states (although informative) that following information should be
present as suggested minimum test plan content)
3 Description of the BASIC SAFETY and ESSENTIALPERFORMANCE including a
description how the BASIC SAFETY and ESSENTIAL PERFORMANCE will be monitored
against
the standards did apply to them. So when a company
tells me their product does not require safety certification I get nervous.
I usually tell them going through a safety certification is cheap
insurance. Then explain the cost of recalls and how a safety certification
can help prevent a recall.
Jim Bacher
Hello
A manufacturer of medical equipment has declared that his device has no basic
safety or essential requirements.
During ESD testing, the device stopped working after Air Discharges of ±15 kV
were applied.
Is this regarded as a failure according to the standard?
No Part 2 particular Safety
systems into the factory for
> my employer's large magnetic stuff.
>
> Brian
>
>
> From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 9:30 AM
> To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: [PSES] Safety Testing Sotware
>
> All,
>
of my products through that line.
__
Dan Roman, N.C.E.
Senior Member
IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
mailto:dan.ro...@ieee.org
From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 12:30 PM
will be to put Type Test systems into the factory for my
employer's large magnetic stuff.
Brian
From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 9:30 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Safety Testing Sotware
All,
Am aware of several EMC testing software
All,
Am aware of several EMC testing software packages available. Today, I am
curious to know if you use automated software for safety type testing
(engineering tests). I am also aware of solutions intended for high volume
production line testing. From my experience it seems that the most
s from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE
-emission.no]
Sent: 04 December 2017 01:01
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: [PSES] Taiwan - EMC and electrical safety test lab
In Scandinavia:
One day in EMC chamber and 1 day for other EMC testing can be to a cost of EUR
4.000
IEC60950-1 on a 12V
Well, for those interested, We are a UKAS accredited lab (since 1999) in India
and can provide far more faster and cost effective EMC and safety testing
services.
Can see our UKAS Schedule on UKAS website.
https://www.ukas.com/wp-content/uploads/schedule_uploads/2/2437Testing%20Single.pdf
?
Is it faster access to the test labs?
Thanks.
Best regards
Amund
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<em
.
__
Dan Roman, N.C.E.
Senior Member
IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
<mailto:dan.ro...@ieee.org> mailto:dan.ro...@ieee.org
From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 4:04 PM
To: EM
PE
Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant
PO Box 23427
Tigard, ORe 97281-3427
503/452-1201
<mailto:p.perk...@ieee.org> p.perk...@ieee.org
From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 1:04 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
S
info? I thought
> I did but cannot find it at the moment.
>
>
>
> ______
> Dan Roman, N.C.E.
>
> Senior Member
>
> IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
>
> mailto:dan.ro...@ieee.org <dan.ro...@ieee.org&g
All,
For a number of years I have used a website that now seems to be retired
and recycled. Safety Link was great resource and is now a company working
in Fall Protection. You can see the changes at archive.org
- Old:
https://web.archive.org/web/20170711180031/http
21:20
>
> *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: [PSES] Safety critical component part #'s and Agency
> approvals
>
>
>
> All fluxed up!
>
>
>
> With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only
>
> www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates
Velly Good J
From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: 22 September 2017 21:20
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety critical component part #'s and Agency approvals
All fluxed up!
With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only
<h
Friday, September 22, 2017 9:05 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety critical component part #'s and Agency approvals
And, as an example of “sorting” a supplier, we began to get hipot failures on
a product and tracked it down to a simple IEC power outlet which was flashing
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety critical component part #'s and Agency approvals
Back when I was working…
For each of our part numbers, we had a drawing (spec). For purchased parts,
the drawing was a cut and paste of the part manufacturer’s spec. This drawing
equated our part number
: Re: [PSES] Safety critical component part #'s and Agency approvals
Back when I was working…
For each of our part numbers, we had a drawing (spec). For purchased parts,
the drawing was a cut and paste of the part manufacturer’s spec. This drawing
equated our part number to the manufactur
inspectors could find no
deficiencies. Sigh.
Rich
*From:* Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
*Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 5:44 AM
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] Safety critical component part #'s and Agency
approvals
We address this possible i
, 2017 5:44 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety critical component part #'s and Agency approvals
We address this possible issue in two ways.
1. We list the certification markings that are on Safety Critical
Components on our purchase print as “incoming inspection
. That’s usually when I say goodbye and pick an alternative.
-Dave
From: John Allen [mailto:09cc677f395b-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 4:48 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety critical component part #'s and Agency approvals
Datasheets
nar...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 9:48 AM
*To:* Kunde, Brian
*Cc:* EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
*Subject:* [BULK] Re: [PSES] Safety critical component part #'s and Agency
approvals
*Importance:* Low
Thanks Brian. That's great you do this.
Can you share any examples of where they have
Brian
From: Regan Arndt [mailto:reganar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 9:48 AM
To: Kunde, Brian
Cc: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [BULK] Re: [PSES] Safety critical component part #'s and Agency
approvals
Importance: Low
Thanks Brian. That's great you do this.
Can you share
he certification markings that are on Safety Critical
Components on our purchase print as “incoming inspection requirements”.
When parts are received, our IQA department visually verifies that the
certification markings on the parts match the print. If they are different,
the parts are rejected until
We address this possible issue in two ways.
1. We list the certification markings that are on Safety Critical
Components on our purchase print as “incoming inspection requirements”. When
parts are received, our IQA department visually verifies that the certification
markings
AND, as I should have said, obtained up-to-date copies of the certification
docs!
John E Allen
W. London, UK
From: Regan Arndt [mailto:reganar...@gmail.com]
Sent: 21 September 2017 21:39
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Safety critical component part #'s and Agency
] Safety critical component part #'s and Agency approvals
I have run into this a lot: I don't have any specific example part numbers
saved, but often I will be given a datasheet that claims certification with a
certain NRTL standard but I can't validate it online. When asked, the
manufacturer
at the component is
> approved but in reality, it is not.
>
>
> Has anyone experienced anything recently that they wish to share?
>
>
> P.S. I am updating my old safety presentation and need some good examples
> before I present again to our local IEEE chapter meeting.
>
&g
that the component is
approved but in reality, it is not.
Has anyone experienced anything recently that they wish to share?
P.S. I am updating my old safety presentation and need some good examples
before I present again to our local IEEE chapter meeting.
Thanks for sharing whatever you can. (privately
A paper and thoughtful discussions by G. Biegelmeier are in the
"Electrical Shock Safety Criteria: Proceedings of the First
International Symposium on Electrical Shock Safety Criteria"
publication.
Regards
M
not aware if it is publicly available, like the earlier
symposium – which you unearthed.
If someone finds this later work, let us all know.
:>) br, Pete
Peter E Perkins, PE
Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant
PO Box 23427
Tiga
After some internet searching I found the complete, 350 page,
"Electrical Shock Safety Criteria: Proceedings of the First
International Symposium on Electrical Shock Safety Criteria" by M.
Vainberg (Author), J. E. Bridges (Editor), G. L. Ford (Editor), I. A.
Sherman (Editor)
Hi all,
Good evening,
After visited the website, http://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/newsletters.html, I
noticed that IEEE Product Safety Society Newsletters published from 1999 to
2005 were not available.
May I know does anyone know where they are located from access ?
Hope to hear from you soon
At http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080253992500187
I found
Electrical Shock Safety Criteria
Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Electrical Shock
Safety Criteria
1985, Pages 173–181
DYNAMIC ASPECTS OF BODY IMPEDANCE
Richard Nute
Tektronix, Inc
Dear Colleagues,
Let me to recommend you my new book “Electrical Product Compliance and Safety
Engineering” published by Artech House.
Please refer to the below info and use for orders (with a 30% discount and free
shipping) the Promo Code: LOZ30 (offer expires on May 31, 2017
liance with Taylor Company policies and standards and
to protect our business.
---
From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 1:14 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [External] Re: [PSES] Product Safet
mon.co.uk/> www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and
Associates Rayleigh England
Sylvae in aeternum manent.
From: Vincent Lee [mailto:08e6c8d35910-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 6:33 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Product Safety on refrigeration
Hi all,
Good day,
1) May I know what are some of the product safety standards for refrigeration
compressors and related products ?
2) What are some of the common safety risk or hazards posed by refrigeration
compressors and related products?
3) And how to test and mitigate such risk ?
Hope
Ralph,
Oooops... my fumble fingers typo error...
Try IEC 61204-7, Low-voltage switch mode power supplies - Part 7:
Safety requirements. Ed 2 is just coming out; the FDIS was voted in last fall.
:>) br, Pete
Peter E Perkins, PE
Principal Product Saf
);
• low voltage stabilized d.c. power supplies
It doesn't mention inverters used in vehicles, but I think the principles of
electrical safety in this standard would apply equally well to a small, 12V
inverter.
Ralph McDiarmid
Product Compliance
Engineering
Solar Business
Schneider Electric
From
Ralph, et al,
Thanx to Bostjan for this reference.
IEC 62477-1 Safety requirements for power electronic converter systems
and equipment - Part 1: General.
Or
IEC 61207-7 Ed 2 (based upon 62477-1) Low-voltage switch mode power
supplies - Part 7: Safety
7 9:03 AM
To: John Woodgate <jmw1...@btinternet.com>
Cc: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [PSES] safety standard - mobile inverters
What about IEC 62109-2 with emphasis on standalone (i.e. not grid-connected)?
Regards,
Adam in Atlanta
adam.di...@ieee.org <mailto:adam.di...@ieee.org&g
What about IEC 62477-1: Safety requirements for power electronic converter
systems and equipment - Part 1: General
With kind regards,
Boštjan Glavič
Head of Laboratory
Safety and Electromagnetics
phone +386 1 4778 265
SIQ Ljubljana - Trzaska cesta 2 - 1000 Ljubljana - Slovenia - www.siq.si
What about IEC 62109-2 with emphasis on standalone (i.e. not
grid-connected)?
Regards,
Adam in Atlanta
adam.di...@ieee.org
IEC 62109-2:2011 Safety of power converters for use in photovoltaic power
systems - Part 2: Particular requirements for inverters
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:31 AM, John
.
-Original Message-
From: Ralph McDiarmid [mailto:ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 7:37 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] safety standard - mobile inverters
Dear group,
I am looking for suggestions on best-fit product safety
this at home. The scenario presented above
may be a dramatic reenactment.
-Original Message-
From: Ralph McDiarmid [mailto:ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 11:37 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] safety standard - mobile inverters
Dear group,
I am looking for suggestions on best-fit product safety standard for LVD for a
230V inverter intended for vehicular use only. (buses & small trucks)
Test lab suggests EN60950, which I dismissed. EN50178 and EN60335-1 don’t
appear to be suitable. I’m really looking for an
J (well, sort of!)
From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com]
Sent: 01 February 2017 22:17
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Do it yourself safety reports?
You are correct,
I recall in 1995 when the VP of Engineering at my company back then obtained a
copy of a few
You are correct,
I recall in 1995 when the VP of Engineering at my company back then
obtained a copy of a few safety standards and attempted to outline and
distill requirements for our products. He felt he could make quick work of
it but was soon overwhelmed. As it turns out
” and understanding them…….”
John E Allen.
From: john Allen [mailto:john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 01 February 2017 21:59
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Do it yourself safety reports?
Doug
I don’t doubt that when you become very familiar with the IEC TRF
From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com]
Sent: 01 February 2017 21:13
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Do it yourself safety reports?
John,
Interesting that I am in the USA and having cut my compliance teeth on the
IECEE TRF format, I actually prefer it to other
EEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Do it yourself safety reports?
Good, but you need the slogan, so people remember. 'Compliance 101' is
neutral and boring. It could be DESIGN IT IN! but maybe someone can produce
a better one.
With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO - Own Opinions Only
<http://www.jmwa.dem
that a safety lab engineer is any better at this is not
necessarily true either. I've had opportunity to review the work of many
and often find errors and omissions. I think the prevailing idea for
generating these IEC report forms is to diagram each phrase found in the
standard and break it out
odgate and Associates
Rayleigh England
Sylvae in aeternum manent.
From: John Allen [mailto:jral...@productsafetyinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 8:34 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Do it yourself safety reports?
This is what the Compliance 101 Track is all about!! Lear
, I'd be happy to talk to any corporation,
free of charge about how we can help make Certifications easier and more cost
effective.
Best Regards,
John
John Allen | President
Product Safety Consulting, Inc.
Your Outsourced Compliance Department
www.productsafetyinc.com<h
ttp://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk/> www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and
Associates Rayleigh England
Sylvae in aeternum manent.
From: John Allen [mailto:john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 8:07 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Do it yourself safety reports?
I
I think (from bitter experience over many years!) that one of the biggest
problems that the “do it yourself” safety compliance report company encounters
is that most people who do that first then try to use the IEC Test Report Forms
(TRF), but find that the format and content of those, and what
MemberPSES/EMCS/cesdan.ro...@ieee.org
Original message
From: "ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen" <g.grem...@cetest.nl>
Date: 2/1/17 4:22 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Do it yourself safety reports?
I
Installation
and safety documentation might be needed.
If the battery is chargeable and a power supply is included it needs
verification of its documentation and needs reinforced insulation,
both mechanically and electrically, as the secondary "live parts" are rarely
earthed in these type
o
Curtis McNamara [mailto:mcnam...@umn.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 11:29 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Do it yourself safety reports?
A client is asking if it is practical to do their own 60950 safety reports for
CE.
The device is battery powered, low power RF (they woul
McNamara [mailto:mcnam...@umn.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 3:29 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Do it yourself safety reports?
A client is asking if it is practical to do their own 60950 safety reports for
CE.
The device is battery powered, low power RF (they would have
A client is asking if it is practical to do their own 60950 safety reports
for CE.
The device is battery powered, low power RF (they would have complete EMC
testing done at a lab).
Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
Thanks for all the great past advice!
Curt
: Amund Westin [mailto:am...@westin-emission.no]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 9:31 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Safety tests of transformers
LVD testing of transformers are according to the EN 61558 series.
Which subpart will apply for an oil filled isolation transformer?
EN
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
Amund,
I don't think you can apply Exemptions to the RoHS directive across the
definition of "Safety Critical Products" unless your product clearly falls
within the exempt equipment called out in Article 2 paragraph 4. Parts of your
product or components can fall under numerous
ROHS mention some exemption of products in the latest directive (Article
2 in 2011/64/EU).
What about so called "Safety critical products", such as IEC61508
certified products ... are they outside the ROHS scope? I do not think
so, but I have heard rumors that it might be outside,
[mailto:0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 12:39 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] US electrical safety standard for product tested to EN
60204?
Curt,
NFPA 79 is harmonized with EN 60204. The US differences are
clearly
this more offline if you wish.
:>) br, Pete
Peter E Perkins, PE
Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant
PO Box 23427
Tigard, ORe 97281-3427
503/452-1201
<mailto:p.perk...@ieee.org> p.perk...@ieee.org
From: Curtis McNamara [mailto:mcn
Hi Curt,
I believe UL1647 and CSA C22.2 No. 68 would be the Standards for USA and Canada.
Best Regards,
John
John Allen | President
Product Safety Consulting, Inc.
Your Outsourced Compliance Department
www.productsafetyinc.com<http://www.productsafetyinc.com>
630-238-0188
On Dec 3
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-ps
...@esterline.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 11:24 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] Which Safety Test Agency Reports are
accepted by City of LA Test Lab (please provide text of requirement or code)
It was always my impression way back then that the case
[mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 11:10 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] Which Safety Test Agency Reports are accepted by
City of LA Test Lab (please provide text of requirement or code)
Hi Leo:
LA requires NRTL certification. (I saw
]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 11:22 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Which Safety Test Agency Reports are accepted by City of LA
Test Lab (please provide text of requirement or code)
Hi All,
I am working with a client that will be installing a pretty big medical device
Safety Consulting, Inc.
Your Outsourced Compliance Department
www.productsafetyinc.com<http://www.productsafetyinc.com>
630-238-0188
On Nov 23, 2016, at 4:35 AM, Kevin Robinson
<kevinrobinso...@gmail.com<mailto:kevinrobinso...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Leo,
The City of LA mainta
or a reference to a City of LA code or
> similar would be really great to get too.
>
> Thx much,
>
> Leonard (Leo) Eisner, P.E.
> Principal Consultant, Eisner Safety Consultants
> Phone: (503) 244-6151
> Mobile: (503) 709-8328
> Email: l...@eisnersafety.co
code or similar would be really great to get too.
Thx much,
Leonard (Leo) Eisner, P.E.
Principal Consultant, Eisner Safety Consultants
Phone: (503) 244-6151
Mobile: (503) 709-8328
Email: l...@eisnersafety.com
Website: www.EisnerSafety.com
*** Internet E-mail Confidentiality
in aeternum manent.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2016 2:10 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
Remember the RCA Victor record album picture of the dog
26 Aug 2016 22:47:23 +0100
> To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> Subject: Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
>
> Interchannel phase differences *measurably* alter the stereo image. Phase
> difference between voltage and current has no effect unles
I'm assuming they recorded it on Memorex:)
-Original Message-
From: Peter Tarver [mailto:ptar...@enphaseenergy.com]
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 3:58 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
Some of the articles I'd read
301 - 400 of 3451 matches
Mail list logo
