, Essex UK
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web
-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] safety distances in DC/DC
In message
blupr02mb11639e55993bee1e45c09ffc1...@blupr02mb116.namprd02.prod.outlookmailto:blupr02mb11639e55993bee1e45c09ffc1...@blupr02mb116.namprd02.prod.outlook
.com, dated Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Brian Oconnell
oconne
.
Good luck, and best regards,
Rich
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings
Grounded SELV is PELV in EN 60204-1.
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 1:59 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] safety distances in DC/DC
In message
blupr02mb116d0a3db08c7130da56befc1
] safety distances in DC/DC
Dear Boštjan:
a) If internal distances input to output comply with functional insulation
only, fault condition tests need to be performed on functional insulation
(including transformer) in order to be sure that output remains SELV. In
addition, transformer
PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] safety distances in DC/DC
Dear experts,
We are evaluating DC/DC converter with SELV-in/SELV-out specification according
to IEC 60950-1. We have measured internal working voltages on the transformer
between input and output side and they were
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc
models, but only an EIS. Note that
UL1446 does not scope any performance requirements for any class of end-use
equipment.
Brian
From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 4:45 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety of Small Motors
Hi Brian
to avoid fault condition tests.
I am quite positive about scenario a) and c) but not sure about scenario b).
Thank you for your support.
Best regards,
Boštjan Glavič
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments
that the recognition applies to all
motors from the OEM for a series for example with a certain prefix in the
part/model number.
-Dave
From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 7:45 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety of Small Motors
Hi
We want to use a small air pump, about the size of an aquarium pump, in one of
our products (laboratory equipment). It has a small 24Vdc brushed motor without
any visible safety certification markings.
In these cases, we usually perform the locked rotor test according to IEC/UL/EN
61010-1
Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
When I turn my back on the sun, it's to look for a rainbow
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering
in the end-use
installation to verify the component meets the original safety assessment.
Avoid using the term 'inherently' unless the component has been assessed and
there is certification. If the motor is an UL- recognized component, then there
will be a file number, designation, and conditions
, 2015 4:09 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety of Small Motors
Clauses 6, 9, and 10 provide definition of a hazard and a hazardous condition.
Some motors are designed with a section of the winding to act as a fusible
link, so not unreasonable for a section of the winding
was very thorough).
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: Brian Oconnell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 4:37 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety of Small Motors
No.
As for an EIS, the UL file will specify this in the respective
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety of Small Motors
In message
64D32EE8B9CBDD44963ACB076A5F6ABB026CA9B0@Mailbox-Tech.lecotech.local,
dated Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Kunde, Brian brian_ku...@lecotc.com writes:
If the winding overheated and melted open, would this be considered a
fire hazard?
Not just
at
the UL report's conditions of acceptability.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Nyffenegger, Dave [mailto:dave.nyffeneg...@bhemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 1:28 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety of Small Motors
I've been told that UL does
13, 2015 1:34 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety of Small Motors
The pump manufacturer just sent me a picture of the motor name plate which must
somehow be hidden from view when installed in the pump assembly. Anyway, the
motor is made in Germany and has the CE marking
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments
...@agilent.com]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 1:10 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Hi pressure Gas safety regulations
To the Collective knowledge of this group,
I am looking for regulations that would impact lab or industrial equipment that
uses high pressure gases
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Hi pressure Gas safety regulations
To the Collective knowledge of this group,
I am looking for regulations that would impact lab or industrial equipment that
uses high pressure gases. This would be gases at pressures up to 600 Bar/ 8000
psi
In accordance with the PSES bylaws, candidate nominations are now being
accepted for the 2014 IEEE Annual Elections of officers for the IEEE Product
Safety Engineering Society (PSES) Board of Directors for a two year term,
beginning January 1, 2015.
Open positions are:
* Secretary
://www.verizonbusiness.com/uk
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived
, 2014 4:08 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] EN60204 Safety of machinery - Electrical equipemnt of machines
Could l please have your feedback.
EN60204 appears in the OJ for the Machinery Directive, (MD) but does not give a
Presumption of conformity as it is not classified as B or C
the
presumption of conformity or do we just have to use a different standard ?
Regards
Ian White
Compliance and Reliability.
Nick Williams
Director
Direct line: +44 1298 873811
Mobile: +44 7702 995135
email: nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk
-
Conformance Ltd - Product safety, approvals
; it has a combination safe holding the
interlock.
Cortland Richmond
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org
AM
To: Nyffenegger, Dave
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety Interlock Switches
I had a very similar situation. Are you using a CK or Omron switch? I also
remember seeing the switch and thinking it looks like the door light switch
from an old refrigerator. I have a very
to get some general
feedback on the specific questions independent of the PLr.
Thanks
-Dave
From: Douglas Nix [mailto:d...@ieee.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 9:32 AM
To: Nyffenegger, Dave
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG; ibm...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety Interlock Switches
Dave
the equipment to powered up for troubleshooting?
The 300 Kg office copier; it has a combination safe holding the interlock.
Cortland Richmond
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list
and any attachments.
*From:* Nyffenegger, Dave [mailto:dave.nyffeneg...@bhemail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 11, 2014 6:51 AM
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] Safety Interlock Switches
Machinery Directive and LVD are most certainly applicable to the products
in question
with these standards so one question is if those standards in anyway
qualify or disqualify (by using the switch in a way not intended) the switch
for use as a safety interlock.
I thought I read in one of the safety standards that interlock switches should
be designed/rated to last the lifetime of the equipment
for the application. I'm not familiar with
these standards so one question is if those standards in anyway qualify or
disqualify (by using the switch in a way not intended) the switch for use
as a safety interlock.
I thought I read in one of the safety standards that interlock switches
should
Hello,
Would anyone know the safety labelling requirements for domestic
appliances, specifically microwave ovens, sold in the Indian market? I
have looked at the CB bulletin but there are no additional requirements
for India, I've also looked at the BIS website but found nothing of use
to deal with as
they are apt to change with little or no notice. Good luck.
Regards,
Patty Knudsen
PRODUCT SAFETY ENGINEERING
17095 Via del Campo
San Diego, CA 92127
858-485-3748
Teradata
Analytic Data Platforms | Applications | Services
patricia.knud...@teradata.commailto:patricia.knud
Esteemed colleagues,
Is there any type of award or recognition for product safety either at a
product level or at a company level? Do any of the industry design awards
include product safety as part of their evaluation criteria? If not, is this
an area that the IEEE Product Safety
://www.psessymposium.org/
Rich
On 2/18/2014 9:45 AM, Willard Bradley-G13637 wrote:
Esteemed colleagues,
Is there any type of award or recognition for product safety either at
a product level or at a company level? Do any of the industry design
awards include product safety as part
.
From: Willard Bradley-G13637 [mailto:bradley.will...@motorolasolutions.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 7:46 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Gold medal for product safety?
Esteemed colleagues,
Is there any type of award or recognition for product safety either
I'm looking for information regarding machinery safety regulations in Canada.
We have been told by customers in Ontario that a Pre-Start Health Safety
Review is required by a Professional Engineer, although I don't know if that is
in fact a legal requirement or under what circumstances
://ec.europa.eu/consumers/safety/prod_legis/index_en.htm
Article 3.3 of the GPSD discusses the hierarchy for demonstration of
compliance through application of standards and/or other documents.
Regards
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29
Scott,
There is no Declaration required for the GPSD, so the question does not arise.
Charlie is correct that the GPSD is a catch-all which applies where other
safety directives such as those which require CE marking do not, but it’s
probably also worth making two other points:
1. The GPSD
Scott
Is this directive applicable to all products?
No - it's more of a catch-all for consumer products not covered by other (CE
marking) directives.
More information http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/safety/prod_legis/index_en.htm
Article 3.3 of the GPSD discusses the hierarchy
in compliance
with GPSD?
Best regards,
Scott
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings
Hello Everyone,
We are currently looking for Electrical Safety Expert Consultants to establish
Power Innovation and Research Center in Munich Germany.
You are an experienced electrical safety expert with worldwide vision, with
excellent understanding of safety standard VDE0100, IEC60364, IEC/EN
angles and distance the light causes no
discomfort to look at it.
The IEC/EN/UL/CSA 61010-1 safety standard only includes information about UV
light. The EUT is classified as Laboratory Equipment.
My Google research mentions the standard IEC 60825 and IEC 62471 and test
method ANSI/IESNA RP-27
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] LED Indicator Safety
Greetings to all. I'm being asked by Engineering regarding the brightness of a
Green LED Indicator they want to use on the front of an upcoming product. The
LED is quite bright and is used with a Light Pipe which shows through the front
[mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 8:56 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [External] [PSES] LED Indicator Safety
Greetings to all.
I'm being asked by Engineering regarding the brightness of a Green LED
Indicator they want to use on the front of an upcoming
Engineering a value
and tell them to keep their LEDs below that level and you will have no problem.
Thanks,
The Other Brian
From: Anthony Thomson [mailto:ton...@europe.com]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 10:33 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] LED Indicator Safety
Hello Brian
Sounds like a question for an optometrist or ophthalmologist.
-Dave
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 4:32 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] LED Indicator Safety
They want the LED itself to be bright so it shines through
or telephone and delete it and any attachments from your computer system and
records.
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 4:32 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] LED Indicator Safety
They want the LED itself to be bright so it shines
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] LED Indicator Safety
Sounds like a question for an optometrist or ophthalmologist.
-Dave
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 4:32 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] LED Indicator Safety
They want the LED
(specifically
in EN 60950-1:2006+A12:2011).
You probably need to look at these:
IEC 62471 Edition 1.0 (2006-07-26) Photobiological safety of lamps and
lamp systems
IEC/TR 62471-2 Edition 1.0 (2009-08-06) Photobiological safety of lamps
and lamp systems - Part 2: Guidance on manufacturing
have very
strange ideas.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety
: [PSES] LED Indicator Safety
They want the LED itself to be bright so it shines through the Light Pipe with
good intensity. LED brightness is a relative thing. If your product is used in
a relatively dark ambient room the indicators appear too bright (get out the
black tape). But it if is installed
and 200 nm), the value of IEC 62471
for 200 nm is used.
Best regards,
Bostjan
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 11:12 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] LED Indicator Safety
In message
In message
17a89daa0a5a44ba927bece934633...@blupr02mb116.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
, dated Thu, 2 Jan 2014, Brian Oconnell oconne...@tamuracorp.com
writes:
Is IEC61000-1-2 intended to supplement or obsolete IEC61508?
No; IEC 61508 is about functional safety **in general**, not just about
Some years ago there was a discussion thread on this forum about safety implications of EMC. Plenty of member war stories were mentioned. Stories like the radio used by an EMT interfering with life support equipment and so on. In my view this really is about public safety. Non-interference
In message 20140102195816.5320843.77757.6...@gmail.com, dated Thu, 2
Jan 2014, dougp01 doug...@gmail.com writes:
Some years ago there was a discussion thread on this forum about safety
implications of EMC. Plenty of member war stories were mentioned.
Stories like the radio used by an EMT
Is IEC61000-1-2 intended to supplement or obsolete IEC61508?
What is 'intent' of TC77 for IEC 61000-6-7?
As IEC61000-1-2 is a functional safety thingy, does this mean that IEC62368-1
will never reference?
Is there a CENELEC or IEC or ISO guidance doc for when to use, and for the
selection
Hello Rich;
Can I suggest to the safety testing agency to disconnect or stall the fan rotor
for all testing? Would this then mean the CFM rating for the cooling fan would
not be required?
Regards;
Ian McBurney
Design Compliance Engineer.
Allen Heath Ltd.
Kernick Industrial Estate,
Penryn
-- but not much -- in the equipment.
Best wishes for the holiday season,
Richard Nute
Product Safety Consultant
Bend, Oregon, U.S.A.
On 12/16/2013 1:30 AM, McBurney, Ian wrote:
Hello Rich;
Can I suggest to the safety testing agency to disconnect or stall the
fan rotor for all testing? Would
Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site
Stalling would like be required by the agency anyway since a typical failure is
a jam or bearing failure that would lock the rotor.
Gary
From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 11:03 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Cooling fan safety
This is a question for the safety testing engineers.
We have products that contain 12V/24V DC cooling fans that cool either the PSU
or processing circuits.
The fan speeds are reduced with basically a series resistor to reduce audio
noise.
The safety testing agency demands to know the exact
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc
-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 13 December 2013 10:34
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Cooling fan safety query
In message
80f690de07894e049b221728b4a99...@dbxpr07mb206.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
, dated Fri, 13 Dec 2013, McBurney, Ian ian.mcbur...@allen
whether UL have confirmed
electrical safety, because if not, the test house is probably justified.
So you would need to list all the fans that could be used, or find a
less exacting test house.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John
.
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 13 December 2013 11:23
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Cooling fan safety query
In message
ed08bb5be2d841e0a1b0ca499f924...@dbxpr07mb206.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
, dated Fri, 13 Dec 2013
.
Regards
John Allen
Compliance with Experience
W.London. UK
-Original Message-
From: McBurney, Ian [mailto:ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com]
Sent: 13 December 2013 11:05
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Cooling fan safety query
John;
I believe the fans are listed
Industrial Estate,
Penryn, Cornwall. TR10 9LU. UK
T: 01326 372070
E: ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com
-Original Message-
From: John Allen [mailto:john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 13 December 2013 13:31
To: McBurney, Ian; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] Cooling fan safety
[mailto:ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com]
Sent: 13 December 2013 13:55
To: John Allen; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] Cooling fan safety query
John;
I agree the airflow rates will vary with applied voltage and blade profile
but if the product continues to function safely with a stalled rotor why
silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org
2013 14:18
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Cooling fan safety query
In message
ff0018ae2af54a2b95bfa760f8747...@dbxpr07mb206.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
, dated Fri, 13 Dec 2013, McBurney, Ian ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com
writes:
but if the product continues to function safely
to privilege
have not been waived.
.
-Original Message-
From: McBurney, Ian [mailto:ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 8:55 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Cooling fan safety query
John;
I agree the airflow rates will vary with applied
the crucial question!
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering
n.mcbur...@allen-heath.com]
>Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 8:55 AM
>To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>Subject: Re: [PSES] Cooling fan safety query
>
>John;
>
>I agree the airflow rates will vary with applied voltage and blade profile but if the product continues to function "safely&quo
: [External] Re: [PSES] Cooling fan safety query
In message
c8225bb6612e4cf382ba4b073e71d...@dbxpr07mb206.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
, dated Fri, 13 Dec 2013, McBurney, Ian ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com
writes:
I have often asked for the reasoning to many similar problems and get
directed
: [External] Re: [PSES] Cooling fan safety query
A locked rotor test is considered an abnormal and measured temperatures are
allowed to exceed the limits for normal operation. If that happens, then it
proves a minimal amount of airflow is required to maintain safe temperatures
and minimal CFMs
fans, how is the temperature test being
done - at ambient with deltas or in a thermal chamber?
Regards
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: McBurney, Ian [mailto:ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com]
Sent: 13 December 2013 13:55
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Cooling fan safety
Ian -
Another consideration, since you have more than one fan, is that you can
disable *all* fans simultaneously to demonstrate that no cooling is
necessary for safety reasons. This is a multiple fault scenario, but it's
at your discretion to do so to prove your case and eliminates the need
compliance with the
temperature requirements would not be dependent on the CFM
rating.
If no, then the fan can be removed (or disconnected) and the
end-product should meet all the applicable safety requirements,
including the temperature requirements. Under this condition,
the fan is just another
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Automotive safety in the USA
Hello,
has anybody a clue which US regulatory authority is responsbile for the
following question:
As a representative of a German automobile supplier, we are looking for legal
provisions in the USA regarding fuel lines
Loerzer
Globalnorm GmbH
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived
, NFC) and services like Digital TV, HD traffic, local
gas prices, ATM locations and movie times.
* Leads compliance and safety design review meetings.
* Teams with mechanical and electrical engineering to launch
best-in-class navigation systems with the latest technologies
.).
* Leads compliance and safety design review meetings.
* Teams with mechanical and electrical engineering to launch
best-in-class navigation systems with the latest technologies and processors.
* Develops and then communicates the compliance plan elements,
expectations
Colleagues,
Does anyone have any personal experience with TUV Rheinland’s Functional Safety
Engineer Certification Program? I am considering certification as more and more
of my activity is in this area. I would like to hear from anyone with any
personal experience with this program, either
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments
Hello,
does anybody has regulatory knowledge regarding EMC and safety requirements
in Algeria? Product: eletrical test system for radar components.
Best regards
Dipl.-Ing. Michael Loerzer
Managing Director
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
Globalnorm GmbH
Kurfürstenstr. 112
10787
We spec an operating altitude to 3000 m (10,000 feet. sometimes 9800 or
9500 ft, depends on who did the math). We have moved most of our power
supplies to 5000 m in the CQC report for the supply in order to allow us to
claim compliance with the safety requirement to 5000 m in China. We have
: Thursday, September 05, 2013 10:42 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety and Altitude
Exactly, I only listed what we have tested for CB in general. I know that Peru
has no national deviations but many cities are above 3000m.
Best regards,
Bostjan
-Original Message
what
sort of 'requirements' will be imposed.
From: mark gandler markgand...@hotmail.com
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety and Altitude and GDT
Thank you everyone for sending your feedbacks.
Asking
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES
.
If there will be enough responses, I’ll send back statistical breakdown. *
***
Thank you for reading,
Mark
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post
for reading,
Mark
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
LT;emc-p...@ieee.orgmailto:emc-p...@ieee.orgGT;
All emc-pstc postings
: Boštjan Glavič [mailto:bostjan.gla...@siq.si]
发送时间: 2013年9月6日 11:20
收件人: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
主题: Re: [PSES] Safety and Altitude
In addition to 5000m and 2000m we have also approved products up to 2500m,
3048m and 4000m.
Best regards,
Bostjan Glavic
SIQ
On 6. sep. 2013, at 03:12, IBM Ken
Glavič; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: 答复: [PSES] Safety and Altitude
For China CCC, there is no 2500m, 3048m, only 2000m and 5000m.
So you have the choice to add the altitude symbol to show the using condition
is below 2000m, or you can test the clearance distance to meet the higher
altitude
Hello Group,
I am really struggling with this one. Can anyone point me in the right
direction for a product safety requirement on a (12, 24, or 36 VDC) trolling
motor. It is utilizing a 2.4 GHz transceivers for control (key fobs and foot
pedal). For product safety I think UL 1112 may apply
In message 119fa9545c6e264b830c4582886d119068b10...@quimby.dw.local,
dated Tue, 3 Sep 2013, Mark Schmidt mark.schm...@dornerworks.com
writes:
Can anyone point me in the right direction for a product safety
requirement on a (12, 24, or 36 VDC) trolling motor.
What is a trolling motor?
--
OOO
-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Product Safety Standard
In message 119fa9545c6e264b830c4582886d119068b10...@quimby.dw.local,
dated Tue, 3 Sep 2013, Mark Schmidt mark.schm...@dornerworks.com
writes:
Can anyone point me in the right direction for a product safety
requirement on a (12, 24
:
Hello Group,
I am really struggling with this one. Can anyone point me in the right
direction for a product safety requirement on a (12, 24, or 36 VDC) trolling
motor. It is utilizing a 2.4 GHz transceivers for control (key fobs and foot
pedal). For product safety I think UL 1112 may apply
701 - 800 of 3451 matches
Mail list logo
