Hello experts
I have a question about how Annex E of EN 62368-1:2020 should be interpreted.
Does the classification of the audio amplifier output terminals need to be done
with the worst case out-of-phase audio signals (to give the maximum channel to
channel voltage) or with the signals in
cannot be affixed to the product itself,** you can
> affix it to the packaging if there is any, or to any accompanying
> documents. If your product is subject to several EU directives/regulations
> which require a CE marking to be affixed, the accompanying documents must
> indicate that your
re is any, or to any accompanying documents. If your
product is subject to several EU directives/regulations which require a CE
marking to be affixed, the accompanying documents must indicate that your
product conforms to all applicable EU directives/regulations.
So I guess e-labelling
Hello group,
Does anyone know if EU accepts e-Labeling for IT products?
Thank youPeter
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
generally been very good.
John E Allen
W.London, UK
From: Scott Xe
Sent: 20 August 2022 16:51
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety for e-scooters, e-bikes
Dan,
It appears to me that Bosch's products are well designed and made in general
and agree to have
That is very interesting, and there's something to be said about timing.
-Doug
Douglas E Powell
Laporte, Colorado USA
doug...@gmail.com
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/coloradocomplianceguy/>
(UTC -06:00) Mountain Time (US-MDT)
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 10:14 AM Ted Eckert
w
Thank you Scott,
-Doug
Douglas E Powell
Laporte, Colorado USA
doug...@gmail.com
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/coloradocomplianceguy/>
(UTC -06:00) Mountain Time (US-MDT)
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 8:30 AM Scott Xe wrote:
> Dear Doug,
>
> Panasonic, ATL/CATL, BYD, Samsu
Dan,
It appears to me that Bosch's products are well designed and made in
general and agree to have high confidence in their products.
Rgds,
Scott
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 at 21:30, Dan Roman <
0d75e04ed751-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org> wrote:
> Doug/Scott,
>
>
>
&
By coincidence, there was a notice in today's Federal Register that OSHA is
extending UL's scope of recognition to add two standards.
* UL 2272: Standard for electrical systems and personal e-mobility devices
* UL 2849: Standard for electrical systems for eBikes
Ted Eckert
Th
Dear Doug,
Panasonic, ATL/CATL, BYD, Samsung, LG are good batteries for this type of
product.
Regards,
Scott
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 at 22:37, Douglas E Powell wrote:
> Thanks Dan,
>
> So I have to wonder what brand lithium battery Bosch is using. And this
> is a great starting poi
& EN 61558-2-16
o EN 15194 : 2017
Best regards,
Scott
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 at 22:37, Douglas E Powell wrote:
> Thanks Dan,
>
> So I have to wonder what brand lithium battery Bosch is using. And this
> is a great starting point for me to dig in a little.
>
> -Doug
Thanks Dan,
So I have to wonder what brand lithium battery Bosch is using. And this is
a great starting point for me to dig in a little.
-Doug
Douglas E Powell
Laporte, Colorado USA
doug...@gmail.com
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/coloradocomplianceguy/>
(UTC -06:00) Mountain Ti
113397.png@45B27996.EE018906]<https://www.instagram.com/elementtesting/>
[cid:image895532.png@E1F815B2.BA8AC96E]<https://www.youtube.com/c/ElementTesting>
[cid:image564711.jpg@EEF03668.32E29DD0]<https://elementmaterials.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3xQqm84s6IydI5D>
On Sat, 13 Au
Doug/Scott,
My wife’s e-bike has a Bosch motor and battery and seems to be well made and
certified so I am comfortable storing and charging it in my garage. Included a
picture of the label with agency marks, sorry it is a little blurry.
So I think there are definitely safety schemes
Dear Doug,
I learned that China prohibits carrying e-scooters and e-bikes to their
houses and even entering the lifts of the building for storage/charging.
Since the battery capacity is much bigger than the li-ion battery using in
normal portable devices, the battery and the charger must comply
All,
My Friday question is about storage/charging of e-scooters and e-bikes. It
seems that these days more and more people are using these devices and fire
safety is a growing concern. It seems my news feed has a new instance
every few days. Some of these cases are very tragic outcomes, in that
I would use caution.
I have looked into this in the past and possibly there have been recent
developments that would change what I learned. My main concern is the
cycle life rating of the switch. For what ever reason, many E-Stop
switches had a rating of only a few thousand cycles while your
ddition, power is
> removed from the Start Button circuit so the motor cannot unexpectedly
> start.
>
> When the E-Stop button is pressed, it does the same as the Door Switch
> above, but in addition, it also opens the Motor Enable Relay which removes
> the 3-phase power from the V
. In addition, power is
removed from the Start Button circuit so the motor cannot unexpectedly
start.
When the E-Stop button is pressed, it does the same as the Door Switch
above, but in addition, it also opens the Motor Enable Relay which removes
the 3-phase power from the VFD. Now the motor really r
9-5704
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments a
C-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Sent: Wed, Apr 21, 2021 10:27 am
Subject: Re: [PSES] e-Labeling
#yiv9304360912 #yiv9304360912 -- _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered
{}#yiv9304360912 #yiv9304360912 p.yiv9304360912MsoNormal, #yiv9304360912
li.yiv9304360912MsoNormal, #yiv9304360912 div.yiv9304360912MsoNormal
{marg
there accompanying documentation providing it?
:>) br, Pete
Peter E Perkins, PE
Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant
PO Box 1067
Albany, ORe 97321-0413
503/452-1201
IEEE Life Fellow
IEEE PSES 2020 Distinguished Lecturer
Hello group,
Do we know if EU accepts e-Labeling or not?
ThanksPeter
#yiv8202150213 -- filtered {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}#yiv8202150213
filtered {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}#yiv8202150213
p.yiv8202150213MsoNormal, #yiv8202150213 li.yiv8202150213MsoNormal
Derek,
There are two marks – e-mark and E-mark. Lower case ‘e’ was used for the EU’s
automotive directives (95/54/EC and 2004/104/EC) as well as the agricultural
equipment directive (2015/208/EC). About 10 years back the EU switched
compliance for non-ag vehicles to the UN regulatory framework
Good morning folks,
We are positioning our EMC lab to perform e-mark testing. Reading the directive
I’m a little confused if there is other action required besides being assessed
to ISO 17025 by an organization such as NVLAP?
Our scope will have all the test methods for the particular
: [PSES] Draft SAE ARP-958E EMI Measurement Antennas; Calibration
Method: Deeply flawed Revision E is nearing completion and balloting
Estonian Standards are great
If you purchase a 2 user licence (about 25% more), you can copy/paste text
and are not restricted to single PC/laptop
Best regards
Wales, number 05466247
From: Ken Wyatt
Sent: 05 January 2021 15:56
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Draft SAE ARP-958E EMI Measurement Antennas; Calibration
Method: Deeply flawed Revision E is nearing completion and balloting
Hi Ken,
You can get the EN version of CISPR 25 from
> Ken Javor
> Phone: (256) 650-5261
>
>
> From: John Woodgate >
> Organization: J M Woodgate and Associates
> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 20:02:10 +
> To: Ken Javor >, >
> Subject: Re: [PSES] Draft SAE ARP-958E EMI Measurement Antennas; Calibration
> Method:
Regarding e-cigarettes, it’s not too difficult to fathom how compliance with
IEC electrical safety standard may be presented as the product being “safe”.
Regards,
Ari Honkala
From: Bob Griffin
Sent: perjantai 11. joulukuuta 2020 19.29
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Will
Thanks to everyone who has responded to my question about IEC standards for
E-cigarettes. From reading all the responses, here is my current understanding:
1) For ELECTRICAL SAFETY of E-cigarettes and vaping devices, the currently
applicable standard is 60335-1.
2) Work
website.
A broader or related issue was considered by IECEE management on the
certification of ethically questionably products like e-cigarettes, weapons
etc..(their terms, not mine) and it was referred to the IEC Conformity
Assessment Board (CAB) to ensure their work is in line with IEC’s ethical
m.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 2:00 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Will there be an IEC electrical safety standard for
E-cigarettes?
Hello All:
In 2018 here in the USA, UL published a Standard for Safety, UL-8139,
"Electrical Systems of Electronic Cigarettes an
u)
> https://ec.europa.eu/health/tobacco/ecigarettes_fr
>
> Update on European Regulation, Electronic Cigarettes | BSI America
> (bsigroup.com)
> https://www.bsigroup.com/en-US/medical-devices/News-center/E-updates/2016-Enews/Update-on-European-Regulation-Electronic-Cigarett
://www.bsigroup.com/en-US/medical-devices/News-center/E-updates/2016-Enews/Update-on-European-Regulation-Electronic-Cigarettes/>
The following podcast has some information on the difference in approaches
starting at 28 minutes.
The Truth About the Vaping Crisis (Ep. 398) - Freakonomi
and work to
select appropriate requirements from that standard to apply to the
E-cigarette unit. IEC 62368-1 is organized around hazards so it is
straightforward to identify the hazards then chase the requirements in the
standard.
For your case you could use the present UL
Does anyone know whether such a standard is in the developmental stages
within the IEC?
In the meantime, the closest existing IEC standard that might be used for
electrical safety of E-cigarettes appears to be IEC 60335 for "Household and
Similar Electrical Appliances - Safety.&quo
Good morning everybody
There is a table E.2 related to Reduction of Pollution Degrees in EN 61010-1.
I am a little confuse how to use ☹
For example: If we have equipment in Pollution Degree 3 environment and we want
test internally for Pollution Degree 2, we need to use an enclosure IPx7 or
From: Scott Xe
Sent: 21 April 2020 17:55
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] EMC/E-Mark conformity tests
I have an in-car cell phone charger. According to the supplier, if it is
selling alone without mentioning for cell phone charging, it does not require
E-mark compliance.
I have an in-car cell phone charger. According to the supplier, if it is
selling alone without mentioning for cell phone charging, it does not
require E-mark compliance. If the product mentions cell phone charging, it
requires
e-mark testing. How is the charger tested under EMC? What is the
Hello colleagues!
Do (otherwise) passive cables with e-markers require EMC/EMI testing for North
America and Europe?
Example: USB-C cable with power delivery
I don't see a specific exemption for them in the FCC regulation; however, the
function of e-markers is not necessarily taken
–1 and ISO 14121–1 are both replaced
with ISO 12100: 2010(E). And yet ISO TR 14121-2 remains active and
available (https://www.iso.org/standard/57180.html). Throughout the
14121-2 document is reference to 14121-1, ISO 12100-1 and ISO
12100-2. My question is, can ISO TR 14121-2 still be used for
ask!
Doug Nix
d...@ieee.org
+1 (519) 729-5704
> On 16-Sep-19, at 17:00, Douglas Powell wrote:
>
> All,
>
> It seems the old ISO 12100–1 and ISO 14121–1 are both replaced with ISO
> 12100: 2010(E). And yet ISO TR 14121-2 remains active and available
> (https://www.iso.or
All,
It seems the old ISO 12100–1 and ISO 14121–1 are both replaced with ISO
12100: 2010(E). And yet ISO TR 14121-2 remains active and available (
https://www.iso.org/standard/57180.html). Throughout the 14121-2 document
is reference to 14121-1, ISO 12100-1 and ISO 12100-2. My question is, can
ples+Street,+Suite+100+San+Diego,+CA%C2%A0+92121&entry=gmail&source=g>
> 92121
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=9401+Waples+Street,+Suite+100+San+Diego,+CA%C2%A0+92121&entry=gmail&source=g>
> www.braincorp.com <http://www.braincorp.com/>
>
>
>
>
01+Waples+Street,+Suite+100+San+Diego,+CA%C2%A0+92121&entry=gmail&source=g>
www.braincorp.com<http://www.braincorp.com/>
From: "Doug Nix, C.E.T."
Reply-To: "Doug Nix, C.E.T."
Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 at 10:16 AM
To: "EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.OR
The intent is that neither flush nor extended head operators be
> used for e-stop functions. More info in IEC 60947 on that.
>
> 2) Yellow background. Yellow backgrounds have to be big enough to provide
> clear contrast with the red button operator. A tiny ring, or just a yellow
> st
?
There’s no hard answer to this, but I can say this: there are three fundamental
shapes for push button operators, flush, extended, and mushroom. The intent is
that neither flush nor extended head operators be used for e-stop functions.
More info in IEC 60947 on that.
2) Yellow background
O-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2019-04-24 17:43, Brian Kunde wrote:
I am constantly being asked three questions about E-Stops which I
cannot find the answers to.
1. "Mushroom Shape" is specifically called out in some standards but
the new
I am constantly being asked three questions about E-Stops which I cannot
find the answers to.
1. "Mushroom Shape" is specifically called out in some standards but the
newer style e-stop switches are becoming less and less Mushroom Shaped. If
this a concern?
2. "Yellow Backgro
nt
sender.
On Friday, March 29, 2019, 5:30:02 PM EDT, Peter Tarver
wrote:
All -
I just received an unsolicited e-mail from the address of
jrallen-at-productsafetyinc.com. Beware the probable phishing and malware link,
if you receive the same.
Regards,
Peter
several people that I
> know, but please don’t confuse me with John R Allen of Product Safety Inc.
>
> FWIW, I don’t think the data breach in question was specific to UK email
> addresses because there was a huge one a few months ago of a web address
> data base on a particular web
question was specific to UK email
addresses because there was a huge one a few months ago of a web address
data base on a particular website.
John E Allen
W. London, UK
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk]
Sent: 29 March 2019 21:33
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES
Ther are press reports in England of a major email leak - up to a
billion addresses, it is alleged.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2019-03-29 17:56, Peter Tarver wrote:
All -
I just received an unsolicited e
All -
I just received an unsolicited e-mail from the address of
jrallen-at-productsafetyinc.com. Beware the probable phishing and malware link,
if you receive the same.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver
-
This message is from the IEEE
05 January 2018 22:57
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] E-band Radio certification per ETSI and FCC standard
Hello experts,
I am looking for a lab anywhere in EU/ North America/ ASIA which can test and
certify E-band radio ( 71Ghz- 76Ghz and 81Ghz - 86 Ghz) per ETSI and FCC
standards Any hel
Hello experts,
I am looking for a lab anywhere in EU/ North America/ ASIA which can test and
certify E-band radio ( 71Ghz- 76Ghz and 81Ghz - 86 Ghz) per ETSI and FCC
standards
Any help will be much appreciated.
Best, Regards,
Sudhakar wasnik,
Sent from my iPhone
Thank you,
Mark
From: Ben Kim [mailto:benki...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2017 12:03 AM
To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] KC Mark E labeling
Hi Mark,
RRA notice 2015-26 and KATS announcement (date 4/26/2016) include this
information. Click on the
Regards,
Mark
From: Ben Kim [mailto:benki...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 1:42 PM
To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] KC Mark E labeling
Mark,
e-labelling is acceptable in S.Korea. Both RRA and KATS allows manufacture to
use
Thank you Ben,
Is there a link to this that is accessible? Is it on the RRA or KATS site?
Regards,
Mark
From: Ben Kim [mailto:benki...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 1:42 PM
To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] KC Mark E labeling
Mark,
e-labelling
Mark,
e-labelling is acceptable in S.Korea. Both RRA and KATS allows manufacture to
use e-label (in lieu of physical label) for the product that has its own
display (such as smartphone).
Thanks, Ben
On Thursday, September 7, 2017 9:23 AM, "Schmidt, Mark"
wrote:
He
Hello Group,
Can anyone direct me to information concerning e labeling of a Bluetooth module
and Device. We are currently marking the FCC, IC and KC ID physically on the
product label but we ran out of room due to an OEM request on one of our
products. I understand that FCC and IC accept e
chase.
As you have noted, lots of variability in results in the field.
:>) br, Pete
Peter E Perkins, PE
Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant
PO Box 23427
Tigard, ORe 97281-3427
503/452-1201
p.perk...@ieee.org
-Original Message-
From:
h for Cray Computer Backplane. It becomes very apparent why
> technicians would pull out their hair.
>
> -Doug
>
>
> Douglas E Powell
> Laporte, Colorado USA
> doug...@gmail.com <mailto:doug...@gmail.com>
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01
> <http://www.l
n Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 12:59 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] E-Box Layout on Factory Machines
Why do you continue to have a system like that? I know you can't alter it
unilaterally, but perhaps the IEEE should consid
-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] E-Box Layout on Factory Machines
Dave hit the nail on the head. In our type of products and market, we
manufacturer many different products (50 or more families of products), but in
very low quantity. Fifty of one model per year is a lot to us where some model
]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 3:09 PM
To: Kunde, Brian; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] E-Box Layout on Factory Machines
The preceding may not have completely addressed the question. You are probably
looking to identify what standards to apply while designing the product before
: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 3:02 PM
To: 'Kunde, Brian'; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] E-Box Layout on Factory Machines
Brian,
I assume you're asking about US requirements and the inspectors you are asking
about are local AHJs or OSHA. So OSHA and perhaps the AHJs ha
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 1:55 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] E-Box Layout on Factory Machines
I never studied the VSA, but ships built for the Federation had panels in
hallways that could be removed without a tool
om]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 12:01 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] E-Box Layout on Factory Machines
Agree vehemently, but also codified per NECA 1-2015, and the various
workmanship standards of the Vulcan Science Academy. UL508A does not do much
for 'workmanship&#
skill and pride of the assembler. Mike Sherman Graco Inc. Sent from Xfinity Connect Mobile App-- Original Message --From: Doug PowellTo: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGSent: April 4, 2017 at 11:26 AMSubject: Re: [PSES] E-Box Layout on Factory MachinesJust my opinion but the use of heavy locked
o be built pretty.
Brian
From: IBM Ken [mailto:ibm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 6:15 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] E-Box Layout on Factory Machines
I think those types of products are engineered once, and then built and
serviced for decades. Overly neat de
en laid out in
quasi-orthogonal arrangements and when squeezing out every bit of speed was
imperative, direct point to point wiring was just a tad bit faster. Just
for fun, try a google image search for Cray Computer Backplane. It becomes
very apparent why technicians would pull out their hair.
-Dou
similar.
That should explain some of it.
-Dave
From: IBM Ken [mailto:ibm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 9:15 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] E-Box Layout on Factory Machines
I think those types of products are engineered once, and then built and
serviced for
similar.
That should explain some of it.
-Dave
From: IBM Ken [mailto:ibm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 9:15 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] E-Box Layout on Factory Machines
I think those types of products are engineered once, and then built and
serviced for
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
> mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>>
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archi
dential
> information intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you received this
> by mistake, please destroy it and notify us of the error. Thank you.
> -
>
>
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engin
the error. Thank you.
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
> Email: li...@conorthtech.com
> Website: www.conorthtech.com
> --
>
>
> *From:* Kunde, Brian
> *Date:* 2016-12-20 23:54
> *To:* EMC-PSTC
> *Subject:* Re: [PSES] Questions on ESD testing for ECSS-E-ST-20-07C-Rev17
>
> Why Re-invent the wheel? Why not
From: Kunde, Brian
Date: 2016-12-20 23:54
To: EMC-PSTC
Subject: Re: [PSES] Questions on ESD testing for ECSS-E-ST-20-07C-Rev17
Why Re-invent the wheel? Why not just buy an ESD Gun/Generator and be done
with it?
The Other Brian
From: Li Di [mailto:li...@conorthtech.com]
Sent: Tuesday, Decemb
Why Re-invent the wheel? Why not just buy an ESD Gun/Generator and be done
with it?
The Other Brian
From: Li Di [mailto:li...@conorthtech.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 9:33 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Questions on ESD testing for ECSS-E-ST-20-07C-Rev17
Hi Dear
Hi Dear. All,
I have several questions on ESD testing for ECSS-E-ST-20-07C-Rev17. In the
setion 5.4.12.3 of this standard, it describes the ESD testing setup. It is my
first time to use this standard so that I can't under some requirements
completely. In this section, it shows the defin
: Jones, Richard [mailto:richard.jon...@honeywell.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 8:47 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Suitable Transformer for AF E Field Susceptibility Test
Hi
Question for the DO-160 people out there, looking for an alternative High
Voltage Transformer to run
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the
In message <6b8d3d8f-5679-47c6-b992-42033475a...@mac.com>, dated Mon, 11
Aug 2014, Douglas Nix writes:
If you are interested in following the work at the IEC, you might be
interested to know that they are making the IEC e-tech magazine
available via an iOS or Android app. This was re
Colleagues,
If you are interested in following the work at the IEC, you might be interested
to know that they are making the IEC e-tech magazine available via an iOS or
Android app. This was recently announced through an IEC Administrative
Circular, and is available to anyone who is interested
e is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communiti
.@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 04 August 2014 11:14
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] E-Labelling?
In message <052201cfafc6$8f2907d0$ad7b1770$@acbcert.com>, dated Mon, 4 Aug
2014, Michael Derby writes:
>There is a suggestion that devices with an integral screen which us
HI Paul,
Good point…. Disclaimer, I only had my R&TTE hat on. J
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Paul Lovell (plovell) [mailto:plov...@cisco.com]
Sent: 04 August 2014 11:20
To: Michael Derby; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSE
e IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
Hi Michael,
FYI, e-labelling is already permitted in the medical devices area and is
covered by Regulation 207/2012. Permission is limited and anything ending up
with a patient has to be provided with paper, but this might give an idea of
how it might develop for ITE, especially with internet
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] E-Labelling?
Thanks Ralph
Sorry for the abbreviation. Better : electronic labeling.
Mike Violette
Washington Labs & American Certification Body
+1 240 401 1388
On Aug 1, 2014, at 2:00 PM, "McDiarmid, Ralph"
wrote:
Do you mean the e-mark
t: Re: [PSES] E-Labelling?
Thanks Ralph
Sorry for the abbreviation. Better : electronic labeling.
Mike Violette
Washington Labs & American Certification Body
+1 240 401 1388
On Aug 1, 2014, at 2:00 PM, "McDiarmid, Ralph"
mailto:ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com>>
wrote:
Thanks Ralph
Sorry for the abbreviation. Better : electronic labeling.
Mike Violette
Washington Labs & American Certification Body
+1 240 401 1388
> On Aug 1, 2014, at 2:00 PM, "McDiarmid, Ralph"
> wrote:
>
> Do you mea
Do you mean the e-mark or the E-mark?
___
Ralph McDiarmid | Schneider Electric | Solar Business | CANADA |
Regulatory Compliance Engineering
Phone: +1-604-422-2622 | Address: 3700 Gilmore Way, Burnaby
Hi Experts,
I am looking for some guidance on E-labeling in the EU in particular and the
"world" in general.
I understand that the FCC has made some small movements in acceptance of
e-labeling and Japan has some situation where e-labeling is ok, but solicit
information on oth
In message
<1be635868bcd4d2c82783b79aa3c4...@s-ais-exch01-13.esterline.net>, dated
Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Gary McInturff writes:
I'm verifying some customer requirements, in the case in particular the
symbol for an e-stop. The customer spec says it's ID is IEC 5638. I
thou
[mailto:gary.mcintu...@esterline.com]
Sent: 05 February 2014 12:26
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] E-stop graphic symbols
I'm verifying some customer requirements, in the case in particular the symbol
for an e-stop. The customer spec says it's ID is IEC 5638. I thought that wa
I'm verifying some customer requirements, in the case in particular the symbol
for an e-stop. The customer spec says it's ID is IEC 5638. I thought that was
the standard but now think that is just the ID within a standard possibly IEC
60417-5638.
Can someone confirm that. I don
control, and control did have to be exerted to avoid sweeping at a rate
faster than the test sample could evidence susceptibility.
Thus we have Table III.
In 1993, they used a one second dwell time, and very small step sizes. In
the deliberations running up to the -E revision, there was quite a
Chad Airy asks:
Will someone please give a little of the rationale for the changes in
rev E vs F of Table III, Susceptibility Scanning.
I suspect we need look no further than Appendix A 40.3.10.4.1
(4.3.10.4.1) Frequency
1 - 100 of 305 matches
Mail list logo
