RE: Implanted IC in brain

I hope that this era falls into the category of medical equipment using IEC 601. I hate to see 950 get rearranged again. I experienced enough grief with 225 being assimilated into 950. grin Regan Arndt ITE Telecomm Safety Specialist From: Kazimier Gawrzyjal k...@nortelnetworks.com

Re: Routine Hipot testing

RERoutine Hipot testing5/6/96 Be aware that when doing manufacturing floor testing, the 1 second test is for levels 20% higher (AC or DC). IEC 950 also states 3000VAC + 20% for re-inforced. ( 1sec) Regan Arndt Safety Technologist Nortel, Calgary

Re: [PSES] CE-EMC on Submersible Product

and 125 Hz (centre frequency) (re 1μΡa RMS; average noise level in these octave bands over a year) measured by observation stations and/or with the use of models if appropriate (11.2.1). Hope this helps somewhat. Regan Arndt -Original Message- From: T.Sato [mailto:vef00...@nifty.com] Sent

Re: [PSES] RoHS and renewable energy

you offer an 'acceptable' rationale in your D of C for the import authorities? Brian From: Regan Arndt [mailto:re...@empowermicro.com] Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 2:05 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Subject: [PSES] RoHS and renewable energy Gre

[PSES] RoHS and renewable energy

no negative impact on health and the environment and that are sustainable and economically viable. Can someone interpret the bold underlined statement above? It leads to a vague interpretation me thinks. Thanks in advance. Regan Arndt

Re: [PSES] RoHS and renewable energy

be the point of such a restriction (not that EU regulations necessarily have a point!)? With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England Sylvae in aeternum manent. From: Regan Arndt [mailto:re...@empowermicro.com] Sent

Re: [PSES] EMC & its role in reliability

: Douglas Nix [mailto:d...@mac.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 4:19 AM To: Regan Arndt <re...@empowermicro.com> Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] EMC & its role in reliability Regan, There has been a lot of work going on at the IET in this topic, starting with the f

Re: [PSES] EMC & its role in reliability

once. Good Stuff. Brian From: Regan Arndt [mailto:re...@empowermicro.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 4:03 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] EMC & its role in reliability Thanks Doug! Appreciate the offer! Here’s some more thought provoking questions………. If an el

Re: [PSES] 10G base-T ethernet EMC test setup question

I remember taking a class from Professor Brian O'Connell. ;) (P.S. I sat in the front row). He said something of the following: 1. describe the end-use environment of your equipment. 2. specify the EMC standards that will be scoped for your equipment. 3. describe how the component or assembly

Re: [PSES] [RFI] Part 15 isn't enough..

life. (unfortunately). Check out section 2.3.3 – 6 deaths due to medical device EMI problems. As for the New Jersey incident. It could have been prevented. It was just too costly…..until now. http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/29/us/new-jersey-hoboken-train-safety/index.html Regan Arndt From: dward [mailt

Re: [PSES] EMC co-location distance question

the same product / enclosure. I hope this helps. Bill From: Regan Arndt [mailto:re...@empowermicro.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 1:50 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Subject: [PSES] EMC co-location distance question Greetings members, Can anyone

Re: [PSES] EMC co-location distance question

606 (913) 440-1540<tel:(913)%20440-1540> KB5UKT "We call it theory when we know much about something but nothing works, and practice when everything works but nobody knows why." -- Albert Einstein From: Regan Arndt [mailto:re...@empowermicro.com<mailto:re...@empowermicro.com&g

[PSES] EMC co-location distance question

Greetings members, Can anyone shed any light on what ANSI defines as the max distance/limit of a 'co-located' piece of ancillary equipment or other support equipment (on the table) to the main EUT being tested for FCC Part 15 class B for 'unintentional radiators'. I seem to recall 20 cm but I

Re: [PSES] Safety critical component part #'s and Agency approvals

dards are really meaningless and as others have already pointed out this information can change without warning. The Other Brian *From:* Regan Arndt [mailto:reganar...@gmail.com <reganar...@gmail.com>] *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 4:39 PM *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG *S

[PSES] Safety critical component part #'s and Agency approvals

Greetings everyone, My experience in regulatory compliance dates back to 1994 where it was a foregone conclusion that most component manufacturers did not identify their agency certification as a unique identifier in their part number. I have seen some good progress over the years, but I also

Re: [PSES] [BULK] Re: [PSES] Safety critical component part #'s and Agency approvals

we separate old stock (where RoHS is questionable) from new stock? We had to make sure we used up old stock prior to our declarations of RoHS or purge old stock parts to insure we are using RoHS compliant parts. I hope this was helpful. The Other Brian *From:* Regan Arndt [mailto:rega

Re: [PSES] Safety critical component part #'s and Agency approvals

eady pointed out this information can change without warning. The Other Brian *From:* Regan Arndt [mailto:reganar...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 4:39 PM *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG *Subject:* [PSES] Safety critical component part #'s and Agency approvals Greetings

Re: [PSES] Safety critical component part #'s and Agency approvals

rchasing company. >3. Our Compliance Department performs Production Audits (usually on an >annual bases) on all families of products. During these audits, all safety >critical components are verified that they are what they are supposed to be > and verifies the certificati

Re: [PSES] LVD votlage scope query

iple voltage ratings, input or output, the products > are considered > within the scope of this Directive as soon as one of the ratings fall > within the given > voltage rating." > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 2:45 PM Regan Arndt wrote: > >> Hi folks. >> >> It's b

[PSES] LVD votlage scope query

EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32014L0035 Regan Arndt IEEE PSES SCV Chair - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archiv

[PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

any information you have. I'm wanting to update my CE marking training slides with some good solid facts. Regan Arndt - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a mes

Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

Regards > > Charlie > > > > *Charlie Blackham* > > *Sulis Consultants Ltd* > > *Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317* > > *Web: **www.sulisconsultants.com* > <https://outlook.hslive.net/owa/redir.aspx?C=02be3bf3e3a544d1bdf7b6c99fbd12f5=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sulisconsultants.com%2f>

Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

gt; > > > 503/452-1201 > > > > IEEE Life Fellow > > p.perk...@ieee.org > > > > *From:* Regan Arndt > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 31, 2018 3:52 PM > *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG > *Subject:* Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics > > >

Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

Thanks everyone for your feedback and help. Greatly appreciated. Perhaps someday AdCo, RAPEX and other surveillance authorities would have their own blog and get some constructive feedback from the industry. There is always room for improvement. Regan On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 8:06 AM Kunde, Brian

Re: [PSES] MD clarification of the DoC

ccessible. > > Best wishes > John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only > J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk > Rayleigh, Essex UK > > On 2018-12-18 18:43, Regan Arndt wrote: > > Hello folks. Hope you are all enjoying the festive season thus far! > > I was wonderi

[PSES] MD clarification of the DoC

Hello folks. Hope you are all enjoying the festive season thus far! I was wondering if any of you knew the rationale behind requirement #2 in the Machinery Directive and why the other directives do not have this? (as you can see, this is over & above the authorized rep (#10) signing the DoC).

Re: [PSES] MD clarification of the DoC

of concern. This individual is distinctly different than one > who signs the DoC and different than authorized representative, although it > could be the same person as you have pointed out. The Blue Guide probably > has some words on this, it’s been a while since I’ve looked at it. > Te

[PSES] GB or GC?....that is the question....

IVE CONDUCTOR TERMINAL **on the other side.* *NOTE No value is specified for the test current.* Your reply is greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Regan Arndt - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society

Re: [PSES] Automated listserv error message

Hi Peter. Received same message. Weird. On Wed, Apr 24, 2019, 8:32 AM Doug Powell wrote: > All, > > Yesterday I received what was called an automatic removal message from > the listserv. The subject line was "Your removal from the EMC-PSTC > list". And indeed, I was unsubscribed for the first

[PSES] IEC 1010 versus IEC 61010-1

need anything too much in detail, but only highlights. Thanks for helping where you can. Regan Arndt - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send

[PSES] IEC 61010-1:2010 hazardous DC voltage

;) Also, will these voltages also come back to normal in Ed 4? (i.e. 42.4 Vp, 60 VDC) Thanks for shedding any light on this? Regan Arndt - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion

Re: [PSES] IEC 61010-1:2010 hazardous DC voltage

. > > > > Touch voltages are specified in IEC TS 61201. In this standard both 30 > and 33 volts rms are listed, with very little difference in body reaction. > Same for 60 versus 70 volts DC. > > > > Best regards, > > Rich > > > > > > > &

Re: [PSES] IEC 61010-1:2010 hazardous DC voltage

effect which is different, as has been discussed here. > > > > :>) br, Pete > > > > Peter E Perkins, PE > > Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant > > PO Box 1067 > > Albany, ORe 97321-0413 > > > > 503/452-1201 &g

Re: [PSES] Mandatory certification

Hi Peter. Here is a very good link on NRTL and requirements by OSHA: *https://www.osha.gov/dts/shib/shib021610.html * As for the FCC, see this link, specifically subpart B

Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] Mandatory certification

elf-declaration of > the manufacturer that the product is suitable for installation and use in > conformity with the NEC) that is accepted both by jurisdiction and the > market? > > > > Thank you and kind regards, > > > > Bernd > > > > *Von:* Regan Arndt

Re: [PSES] Mandatory certification

he manufacturer) > would hire a NRTL to do a field inspection. > > > > Best regards, > > Rich > > > > > > *From:* Regan Arndt > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 19, 2020 10:46 AM > *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG > *Subject:* Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES]

Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] Mandatory certification

OSHA & the related NRTL mandatory certification is only for the commercial/office/industrial workplace. OSHA has no jurisdiction in the consumer environment. The FCC is for both environments. Regan On Mon, Feb 17, 2020, 8:29 PM <06cee064502d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org> wrote: > Thank you Ted,

Re: [PSES] CE marking quality manufacturing requirements

Sulis Consultants Ltd* > > *Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317* > > *Web: **https://sulisconsultants.com/* <https://sulisconsultants.com/> > > Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247 > > > > *From:* Regan Arndt > *Sent:* 15 January 2020 00:23 > *To:* EMC-PST

[PSES] CE marking quality manufacturing requirements

they forced to because they also have a certification mark on the product (i.e. NRTL program or other certification scheme via a Notified Body). Thanks for any help you can provide me with an official exact clause/text/excerpt from the OJ, guides and/or directives. Regan Arndt

[PSES] Product Safety Engineer opportunity

Sending on behalf of Hunter Bisch of Danaher Ensure Water Quality for the World: Sr. Safety Compliance Engineer I am with talent acquisition at Danaher Corporation, a Fortune 200 science and technology innovator (NYSE:DHR). I am reaching out to you due to your association with the IEEE Product

[PSES] EMO versus EMS

there on Google. Thanks in advance for sharing what you have. Regan Arndt IEEE PSES SV Chapter Chair - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail

[PSES] High voltage versus High tension

nces you had. Regan Arndt - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the

Re: [PSES] Job Opening: Clarion Safety Systems

Thanks Doug. I imagine they will not get many prospects because it mentions the pay is $0.00/hr.lol On Thu, Nov 19, 2020, 9:21 AM Doug Nix wrote: > Colleagues, > > I recently learned that Clarion Safety Systems is looking to fill the > following position. I have nothing to do with the

Re: [PSES] Follow-Up Questions October IEEE PSES Virtual Chapter - OSHA NRTL

Thanks Kevin. Excellent webinar and great discussions. Thank you again. Can you please share your slides? Also, I have not received the IEEE email yet for the recorded download, but do you have a link to that yet? Regan On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 4:10 PM Kevin Robinson wrote: > *Last week I had

[PSES] Looking for a Product Safety Engineer? - Here's your chance....

We look forward to hearing from you if you are interested. Regan Arndt IEEE PSES SCV Chapter Chair regan.ar...@ieee.org John McBain IEEE PSES SCV Chapter Secretary johnmcb...@ieee.org - This message is from the IEEE Pro

[PSES] AI & Regulatory Compliance

IEEE PSES Risk assessment technical committee and am looking for any volunteers to join our group. This topic will be one to discuss soon within our group. Please email me at regan.ar...@ieee.org or reganar...@gmail.com if you are interested in joining. Cheers

[PSES] Seeking volunteers to join the IEEE PSES RATC (Risk Assessment Technical Committee)

com if you are interested in joining. Thank you in advance. Regan Arndt IEEE PSES RATC Chair - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to Al