Re: [PSES] product marking detail for FCC marking

2018-12-11 Thread Michael Derby
From: Pete Perkins [mailto:0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org] Sent: 11 December 2018 00:47 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] product marking detail for FCC marking Speak O oracle: My client is getting pushed by their Euro based EMC lab that when

Re: [PSES] product marking detail for FCC marking

2018-12-10 Thread Bill Owsley
o examples of zero’s with a line through them.   https://www.fcc.gov/oet/ea/fccid#helpSection   Larry   From: Pete Perkins [mailto:0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2018 7:47 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] product marking detail for F

Re: [PSES] product marking detail for FCC marking

2018-12-10 Thread Larry K. Stillings
TC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] product marking detail for FCC marking Speak O oracle: My client is getting pushed by their Euro based EMC lab that when marking a product in compliance with FCC regulations that when the number contains a numeric zero to use a zero with

[PSES] product marking detail for FCC marking

2018-12-10 Thread Pete Perkins
Speak O oracle: My client is getting pushed by their Euro based EMC lab that when marking a product in compliance with FCC regulations that when the number contains a numeric zero to use a zero with a slash rather than the zero provided on the North American keyboard. The

SV: EMC requirements and Product Marking

2001-10-12 Thread amund
vegne av cecil.gitt...@kodak.com Sendt: 12. oktober 2001 16:02 Til: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Emne: EMC requirements and Product Marking Viktighet: Hoy From: Cecil A. Gittens What needs to done to get EMC certification for Switzerland and Norway? Are there any marks required for these countries

Re: EMC requirements and Product Marking

2001-10-12 Thread georgea
cecil.gittens%kodak@interlock.lexmark.com on 10/12/2001 10:02:03 AM Please respond to cecil.gittens%kodak@interlock.lexmark.com To: emc-pstc%majordomo.ieee@interlock.lexmark.com cc:(bcc: George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: EMC requirements and Product Marking From: Cecil

EMC requirements and Product Marking

2001-10-12 Thread cecil . gittens
From: Cecil A. Gittens What needs to done to get EMC certification for Switzerland and Norway? Are there any marks required for these countries? Regards Cecil --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc

RE: Product Marking - new twist

2001-01-26 Thread WOODS
I am commenting on a question and reply which is further back in this continuing conversation. Question: For products with external AC power supplies, would the NRTL mark needto be on the supply and the product? Or the supply only? Previous reply: The external ac power supply must be

RE: Product Marking - new twist

2001-01-26 Thread Ned Devine
: RE: Product Marking - new twist Rich- Thanks for the detailed reply to Chris's questions. Is it possible that a piece of equipment with an NRTL listing can be disconnected by a local electrical inspector/electrician enforcing the NEC because that paticular NRTL is not approved

Re: Product Marking - new twist

2001-01-26 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Andy: Is it possible that a piece of equipment with an NRTL listing can be disconnected by a local electrical inspector/electrician enforcing the NEC because that paticular NRTL is not approved in their jurisdiction? Yes. Please recognize: NRTL is an OSHA program governing

RE: Product Marking - new twist

2001-01-26 Thread Veit, Andy
...@sdd.hp.com] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 1:39 PM To: chris.maxw...@gnnettest.com Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: Product Marking - new twist Hi Chris: For instance, one of the messages says that the NEC gives an electrician the right to unplug an un-NRTL-marked piece

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-25 Thread Don House
recently? Normally we would not consider using UL because of the high cost and long time intervals anyway. Don -Original Message- From: Greg Nielsen [mailto:greg.niel...@setengineering.com] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 10:49 AM To: 'Don House' Subject: RE: Product Marking Don, I

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-25 Thread JRadomski
Of course nothing can be sold in Canada without the Canadian supplied flag labels with the certification number imprinted. Don, The Canadian flag labels can be affixed only to equipment certified by Industry Canada (different issue, not related to the original question [NRTL, safety approvals

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-25 Thread Don House
No arguments here Ron. Best regards, Don -Original Message- From: Ron Pickard [mailto:rpick...@hypercom.com] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 10:31 AM To: Don House Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Product Marking Hi Don, The requirement for most customers, especially

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-25 Thread PGodfrey
To: 'Pham, Tac'; 'Courtland Thomas'; emcpost Subject: RE: Product Marking This is the symbol (see attached) we were advised to use by CSA for both Canada and USA. But no 'UL' to be mentioned anywhere. The testing was through the CB scheme tested here in Australia. Praveen -Original Message

Re: Product Marking - new twist

2001-01-25 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Chris: For instance, one of the messages says that the NEC gives an electrician the right to unplug an un-NRTL-marked piece of equipment. Another message states that the NRTL's mark is the proof of product safety. NRTL is a designation issued by OSHA. Approved is a

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-25 Thread Ron Pickard
Hi Don, The requirement for most customers, especially telecommunications providers, is that the product be LISTED or RECOGNIZED to comply with the safety standards of concern. The most important being UL1950 and NEBS. To be listed and participate in continuing compliance (required) you must

RE: Product Marking - new twist

2001-01-25 Thread Don House
East Carlsbad, CA 92008-6626 USA (760) 918-2552 Office/Lab (760) 476-1519 FAX URL: http://www.excelsus-tech.com -Original Message- From: Chris Maxwell [mailto:chris.maxw...@gnnettest.com] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 6:03 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Product Marking

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-25 Thread Don House
To: 'Pham, Tac'; 'Courtland Thomas'; emcpost Subject: RE: Product Marking This is the symbol (see attached) we were advised to use by CSA for both Canada and USA. But no 'UL' to be mentioned anywhere. The testing was through the CB scheme tested here in Australia. Praveen -Original Message

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-25 Thread Don House
; owner-emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Re: Product Marking Hi Courtland, You asked: I have a question concerning labeling a product. If we go to a NRTL and get Safety testing performed, we typically put the Safety logo (UL for example) on the product label. Our marketing people have a problem

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-25 Thread Joe Finlayson
-0909 x212 Fax:(508) 480-0922 Email: jfinlay...@telica.com -Original Message- From: Gorodetsky, Vitaly [mailto:vgorodet...@canoga.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 8:26 PM To: 'Joe Finlayson'; 'Courtland Thomas'; emcpost Subject: RE: Product Marking Joe - It is the other way

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-25 Thread rfm
...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Product Marking I see no cETL listed at http://www.scc.ca/certific/colist.html I did see ITS listed. bolintic%dscltd@interlock.lexmark.com on 01/24/2001 04:52:35 PM To: George_Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark.LEXMARK@sweeper.lex.lexmark.com, emc-pstc%majordomo.ieee

RE: Product Marking - new twist

2001-01-25 Thread Chris Maxwell
As I read this thread, a couple of the postings stick out in my mind. For instance, one of the messages says that the NEC gives an electrician the right to unplug an un-NRTL-marked piece of equipment. Another message states that the NRTL's mark is the proof of product safety. Courtland's

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-25 Thread Andrews, Kurt
://www.tracewellsystems.com/ -Original Message- From: Praveen Rao [SMTP:p...@tennyson.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 7:36 PM To: 'Pham, Tac'; 'Courtland Thomas'; emcpost Subject:RE: Product Marking This is the symbol (see attached) we

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-25 Thread Gorodetsky, Vitaly
is solely with the reader -Original Message- From: Joe Finlayson [SMTP:jfinlay...@telica.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 12:45 PM To: 'Courtland Thomas'; emcpost Subject:RE: Product Marking My understanding

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-25 Thread Praveen Rao
January 2001 9:00 AM To: 'Courtland Thomas'; emcpost Subject: RE: Product Marking Courtland, The NRTL (UL, CSA) would not like the idea that one marked the product with the word UL or CSA because (their argument) it is misleading. In some cases, TUV, ETL etc. can certify some products using UL/CSA

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-24 Thread Sterner, David [SFS]
is insufficient. The logo implies the manufacturing line is under the NRTL's surveillance. David -Original Message- From: John Juhasz [mailto:jjuh...@fiberoptions.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 2:35 PM To: 'Courtland Thomas'; emcpost Subject: RE: Product Marking Courtland

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-24 Thread Mel Pedersen
] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 2:45 PM To: 'Courtland Thomas'; emcpost Subject: RE: Product Marking My understanding of the NRTL marking is that if you don't mark it, it is not considered Listed. It doesn't matter if it has been tested or not. I believe the issue is that if the NRTL

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-24 Thread Pham, Tac
Thomas [mailto:ctho...@patton.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 1:05 PM To: emcpost Subject:Product Marking Hello group, I have a question concerning labeling a product. If we go to a NRTL and get Safety testing performed, we typically put the Safety logo (UL for example

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-24 Thread Constantin Bolintineanu
[mailto:geor...@lexmark.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 3:49 PM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Product Marking Courtland, You raise a very interesting question, prompted by the usual Dilbert marketing thinking. Here are some comments, in no particular order, nor do I draw a conclusion

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-24 Thread georgea
: George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: RE: Product Marking Dear George, Just a small clarification: in regard to item 5, one of the following.., are mixed-up TESTING AGENCIES(NRTLs) with MARKS. In Canada, are acceptable the following MARKS: CSA, cETL (issued by ITS - Intertek Testing Services

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-24 Thread Clement Dave-LDC009
From: Dick Grobner [mailto:dick.grob...@medgraph.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 4:01 PM . I also know that the City of L.A. is a stickler for a third party mark on a medical device (and I would suspect other devices as will), if it isn't there

Product Marking

2001-01-24 Thread Courtland Thomas
Hello group, I have a question concerning labeling a product. If we go to a NRTL and get Safety testing performed, we typically put the Safety logo (UL for example) on the product label. Our marketing people have a problem with having different logo's. They would like to standarize on a single

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-24 Thread Dick Grobner
a reputable third party NRTL when doing business. Original Message- From: kazimier_gawrzy...@dell.com [mailto:kazimier_gawrzy...@dell.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 10:22 AM To: ctho...@patton.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Product Marking Hi Courtland, For an NRTL

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-24 Thread Joe Finlayson
it, you can not claim NRTL Listing. -Original Message- From: Courtland Thomas [mailto:ctho...@patton.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 4:05 PM To: emcpost Subject: Product Marking Hello group, I have a question concerning labeling a product. If we go to a NRTL and get Safety testing

Re: Product Marking

2001-01-24 Thread Ron Pickard
Hi Courtland, You asked: I have a question concerning labeling a product. If we go to a NRTL and get Safety testing performed, we typically put the Safety logo (UL for example) on the product label. Our marketing people have a problem with having different logo's. They would like to standarize

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-24 Thread John Juhasz
of my employer . . . John Juhasz Fiber Options Bohemia, NY -Original Message- From: Courtland Thomas [mailto:ctho...@patton.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 4:05 PM To: emcpost Subject: Product Marking Hello group, I have a question concerning labeling a product. If we go

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-24 Thread Andrews, Kurt
- From: Courtland Thomas [SMTP:ctho...@patton.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 4:05 PM To: emcpost Subject:Product Marking Hello group, I have a question concerning labeling a product. If we go to a NRTL and get Safety testing

Re: Product Marking

2001-01-24 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Courtland: I have a question concerning labeling a product. If we go to a NRTL and get Safety testing performed, we typically put the Safety logo (UL for example) on the product label. Our marketing people have a problem with having different logo's. They would like to

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-24 Thread WOODS
] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 4:05 PM To: emcpost Subject: Product Marking Hello group, I have a question concerning labeling a product. If we go to a NRTL and get Safety testing performed, we typically put the Safety logo (UL for example) on the product label. Our marketing people have

RE: Product Marking

2001-01-24 Thread Kazimier_Gawrzyjal
the product safe (as opposed to the manufacturer). My 2 cents and not that of my employer. Regards, Kaz Gawrzyjal kazimier_gawrzy...@dell.com -Original Message- From: Courtland Thomas [mailto:ctho...@patton.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 3:05 PM To: emcpost Subject: Product Marking