CISPR 22:1997

with CISPR 22 (or some variation thereof) also postponed implementation of the 1997 version? My immediate concern is Australia. Any information members of this group can share is greatly appreciated. Jim Hulbert Senior Engineer - EMC Pitney Bowes --- This message

RE: Testing for the EMC directive

. If the equipment falls under the scope of EN 55014-2 for immunity, then it naturally also falls under the scope of EN 55014-1 for emissions, and vice versa. These product family standards apply with precedence over generic standards. Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes wo...@sensormatic.com@majordomo.ieee.org

Re: FCC Part 68 Continuing Compliance

verification process for Part 15. The details and logistics of this next step in the de-regulation process are not yet worked out. Jim Hulbert j...@aol.com on 01/18/2001 03:56:52 PM Please respond to j...@aol.com To: ctho...@patton.com, emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org cc:(bcc: Jim Hulbert/MSD

Re: EN61000-3-2 / EN61000-3-3 (Again)

Actually A14, in addition to redefining class D, it extends the no limits clause to all equipment less than 75W, except lighting equipment. -- Forwarded by Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI on 01/03/2001 04:19 PM

Re: EN61000-3-2 / EN61000-3-3 (Again)

on 01/03/2001 12:49:32 PM Please respond to Craig Hensley hens...@iomega.com To: emc-p...@ieee.org cc: Craig Hensley hens...@iomega.com (bcc: Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI) Subject: EN61000-3-2 / EN61000-3-3 (Again) This is probably a gross over-simplification, but I want to make sure I understand

Re: EMI guard bands

Tania and Amund, IMHO, the margin of compliance should be at least equal to or greater than the measurement uncertainty. Measurement uncertainty for radiated emissions is generally in the range of 3 to 4 dB for most labs. Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes

What is Industry Practice for ESD Test Levels?

. Jim Hulbert Senior Engineer Pitney Bowes --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail

Re: Shielded Room

: Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI) Subject: Shielded Room Dear Colleagues, I have been asked to comment on the scope of use/capabilities of shielded rooms (2-3m x 2m). I would appreciate if you would share your opinion on the usefulness of Radiated Emissions tests, validity of data, effectiveness

Re:Grounding

in Electronic Systems by Henry Ott. Jim Hulbert Senior Engineer - EMC Pitney Bowes brian_kunde brian_ku...@leco.com on 12/06/2000 11:36:04 AM Please respond to brian_kunde brian_ku...@leco.com To: PRao p...@tennyson.com.au, emc-pstc emc-p...@ieee.org cc:(bcc: Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI

Re: FCC Part 15 Class B

test laboratory (NVLAP, AALA). Jim Hulbert Senior Engineer-EMC Pitney Bowes Courtland Thomas ctho...@patton.com on 11/28/2000 01:20:01 PM Please respond to Courtland Thomas ctho...@patton.com To: emcpost emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org cc:(bcc: Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI) Subject: FCC Part 15

Measurement Uncertainty

Can anyone recommend a good seminar on measurement uncertainty? We are particularly interested in the uncertainty of EMC measurements. Thank you. Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical

Re: R: R: Voltage Breakdown

I must admit I am also confused. It is a fairly common practice and has proved quite effective to install humidifiers in enclosed environments to reduce the propensity for static electricity generation. Why does this work? Jim Hulbert Senior Engineer Pitney Bowes Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc

Harmonics Emissions

. The supply is a custom-designed switched mode supply and the product it goes into is such a low volume that we don't want to redesign the power supply front end to add PFC unless we absolutely have to. The supply operates at 230V/50Hz single phase and is rated for 600W. Jim Hulbert Senior Engineer

Re: Philosophy for old designs with new requirements.

be found in the front of the standard. The date of withdrawal (DOW) of conflicting standards is the date by which your product must comply with the new or revised standards. Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes don_macart...@selinc.com on 06/19/2000 04:06:58 PM Please respond to don_macart...@selinc.com

RE: Surge Testing per EN 55024/EN61000-4-5

PM Please respond to Lacey,Scott sla...@foxboro.com To: 'Jim Hulbert' hulbe...@micro2.pb.com cc: 'emc-p...@ieee.org' emc-p...@ieee.org (bcc: Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI) Subject: RE: Surge Testing per EN 55024/EN61000-4-5 Jim, I'm not quite sure from the description what your product looks

Surge Testing per EN 55024/EN61000-4-5

not specify placing the EUT over a reference ground plane. With no reference ground plane and no direct ground connection how can a test be applied with respect to ground? Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes - This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc

Surge Test Performance Criterion

by the operator afterward. However, I would like to hear how others who do this testing would interpret this. Jim Hulbert Senior Engineer - EMC Pitney Bowes - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org

Re: My departure

exchange of knowledge and unique experiences between compliance engineering professionals. I believe you have served this purpose better than most and I hope you re-consider your decision not to participate any longer. Jim Hulbert Senior Engineer - EMC Pitney Bowes

[PSES] EN 60950-1:2006+A12:2011

supercedes previous standards on 24 Jan 2013. A12 appears to be incorporating corrigendums (or is that corrigendi?). Does this mean that A12 doesn't add anything substantially new? Jim Hulbert - This message is from the IEEE

[PSES] Semi-Anechoic Chamber Question

test. Thanks. Jim Hulbert - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived

Re: [PSES] Semi-Anechoic Chamber Question

Thank you everyone for the helpful feedback. The consensus is clearly: Save my back and leave the absorber and ferrite tiles in place. Compare radiated emissions measurements in the chamber to those on the OATS (several suggested a comb generator for this purpose). Assign an adjustment

Re: [PSES] Mandatory NRTL certification

Many layers of government...municipal, county, state... -Original Message- From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Richard Nute Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 3:34 PM To: 'John Woodgate'; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] Mandatory NRTL certification

[PSES] Digital Signatures on DofC

This question has probably been asked before, but is a digital signature on a EU DofC an acceptable signature form? Thanks. Jim Hulbert - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list

Re: [PSES] Biconilog antennas and ANSI C63.4:2009

The words such as in paragraph 3 of claus D.1 would indicate that biconical and log-periodic dipole array antennas are examples of broadband antennas, not an exhaustive list. Poorly worded if the intent was to specify the acceptable types of broadband antennas and to exclude any types. Jim

Re: [PSES] Is this common knowledge - Electrical Ratings

It's probably common knowledge on THIS forum that 120-240V indicates an autoranging power supply and 120/240V indicates there is a switch setting for one or the other. I'll bet the average consumer has no idea, though. Jim Hulbert -Original Message- From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc

[PSES] Impact on NRTL Certification - Refurbished/Remanufactured Products

to maintaining NTRL certifications for these products. Jim Hulbert - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your

Re: [PSES] Impact on NRTL Certification - Refurbished/Remanufactured Products

- From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Jim Hulbert Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 12:08 PM To: EMC-PSTC (emc-p...@ieee.org) Subject: Impact on NRTL Certification - Refurbished/Remanufactured Products What is the impact on the original NRTL certification of a product

[PSES] Are Product Safety Certifications Mandatory in Canada?

be certified by one of the Standards Council of Canada approved test laboratories to Canadian standards? Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc

Re: [PSES] Are Product Safety Certifications Mandatory in Canada?

Thank you for responses I've received. They've been very helpful. Jim Hulbert From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Jim Hulbert Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 4:35 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Are Product Safety Certifications Mandatory in Canada

Re: [PSES] EN 61000-4-3 for large industrial equipment

organization with EU recognition and experience in in-situ testing be used. Jim Hulbert From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Blackham Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 3:28 AM To: Ken Javor; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: EN 61000-4-3 for large

Re: [PSES] SV: [PSES] Language Translations for EU Declarations of Conformity (DOCs)

be supplied with each piece of equipment, or as John stated: One full copy should go with every shipment that crosses an EU border, or a Member State border...? Jim Hulbert -Original Message- From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate Sent: Thursday, November

Re: [PSES] RoHS II

That is a frustrating aspect of EU Directives. Might not be a huge deal for consumer products that have a short life-span, but for commercial/industrial products which have longer lives it can be a nuisance. I don't know how many times I've been asked but aren't we grandfathered? Jim Hulbert

[PSES] Class A or Class B on Declaration of Conformity

On CE Declarations of Conformity, where EN 55022 standard has been referenced, is it a requirement that the limit that was applied (class A or class B) also be stated? We show the limit on our DoCs, but some of our OEMs do not. I can't find where it is actually required. Jim Hulbert

Re: [PSES] Class A or Class B on Declaration of Conformity

in which case the user may be required to take adequate measures. How binding is that requirement? Jim Hulbert From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Bill Owsley Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 10:30 PM To: oconne...@tamuracorp.com; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

Re: [PSES] Class A or Class B on Declaration of Conformity

[mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 9:24 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: Class A or Class B on Declaration of Conformity In message 7B9D892F88F070469771832D78B3086E062AC1C4@013-BR1MPN1-012.MGDPBI.global.p vt, dated Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Jim

Re: [PSES] Recast of RTTE directive

A unique DoC for each unit would be unfortunate. Cumbersome without being useful. The only circumstance I can think of where this would be reasonable would be if each unit itself is unique (i.e. custom). Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes -Original Message- From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p

Re: [PSES] test setup for table top ungrounded equipment 61000-4-2 IEC:2008 figure 6 page 20

time from one ESD generator going to be the same as a pulse near the 1ns rise time from another ESD generator? Both generators are within spec. Other parameters are also pretty loose. No wonder ESD testing can sometimes drive people nuts. Jim Hulbert From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p

Re: [PSES] Critical component in EMC report

Of course, if shielded cables, power cords, or special installation instructions are required to insure compliance then this information should be included in the EMC test report. .and in the operator guide or user instructions. Jim Hulbert From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p

Re: [PSES] 60950 1st edition and amendments

There are also amendments. As of 01 Mar 2013, this means EN60950-1:2006 plus amendments A11:2006 , A1:2010, and A12:2011. Jim Hulbert -Original Message- From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Peter Tarver Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 11:35 AM To: EMC-PSTC

RE: Radiated Emission Measurements above 1GHz

EN 55022:2006 does indeed include the limits for radiated emissions in the range 1 GHz to 6 GHz. Look at section 6.2. This standard is published in the OJ and becomes compulsory under the EMC Directive as of 1 Oct 2009. Jim Hulbert, Group Leader TSO Competitive Compliance Engineering

RE: Radiated Emission Measurements above 1GHz

We likewise were never notified that the BS version was withdrawn, if that is the case. It's rather disturbing to think that we may be paying money for and following standards that are wrong. Jim Hulbert, Group Leader TSO Competitive Compliance Engineering Pitney Bowes, 35 Waterview Drive

RE: BS EN 55022

But unless A1 is published in the OJ, it is not a harmonized standard under the EMC Directive, correct? Jim Hulbert, Group Leader TSO Competitive Compliance Engineering Pitney Bowes, 35 Waterview Drive, Shelton, CT 06484 Tel: 203-924-3621 (Internal 442-3621) Fax: 203-924-3352 (Internal 442

RE: Radiated Emission Measurements above 1GHz

that apply to his product. Apparently for EN 55022 that is still the 1 GHz max frequency for measurement. For time-to-market and cost reasons, they stop there. Jim Hulbert, Group Leader TSO Competitive Compliance Engineering Pitney Bowes, 35 Waterview Drive, Shelton, CT 06484 Tel: 203-924-3621

FW: BS EN 55022:1996

in the OJ (I don't think), then it's not yet applicable under the EMC Directive. Please correct me if I am misunderstanding anything. Jim Hulbert, Group Leader TSO Competitive Compliance Engineering Pitney Bowes, 35 Waterview Drive, Shelton, CT 06484 Tel: 203-924-3621 (Internal 442-3621) Fax

RE: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

Article 4 refers to the management system set out in Annex V. Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:54 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby

Re[2]: Korea in a Nut Shell

Todd has a very good question. I don't know of any test lab that takes 3 days to complete emissions testing on one product! (In the context of this debate, I don't think we're talking about doing any immunity testing - just emissions). I don't think a lab that works

Re: CE Marked Subassemblies Components

is held responsible for compliance of the final system. Good judgment and due diligence must always prevail. If in doubt, re-test. __ Jim HulbertTel:203-924

Re[2]: EN50082-1:1996

! __ Jim HulbertTel:203-924-3621 Senior Engineer - EMC Fax:203-924-3352 Pitney Bowes email: hulbe...@pb.com P.O. Box 3000 35 Waterview Drive Shelton, CT 06484-8000 U.S.A

Re[2]: Peripherals

the class B limits. It would also follow that a device cannot be verified as class A unless the composite system in which it is tested meets the class A limits. Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes __ Reply Separator

Re[2]: Inconsistency of EN 50082-1 with 1000-4 series

requirements into our product specifications so that we have the opportunity to define reasonable performance criteria. Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes __ Reply Separator _ Subject: RE: Inconsistency of EN 50082-1 with 1000-4 series Author: Bailin Ma

Testing Telecom Products during Development

and then notifying the local telephone company. Is this still allowed, or should I advise the product development team that they better hold off on field testing until we actually get the product registered? Thanks for your help. Jim Hulbert Senior Engineer

Re[2]: Declarations of Conformity and Markings

. __ Jim HulbertTel:203-924-3621 Senior Engineer - EMC Fax:203-924-3352 Pitney Bowes email: hulbe...@pb.com P.O. Box 3000 35

Responsibility for DoC

. __ Jim HulbertTel:203-924-3621 Senior Engineer - EMC Fax:203-924-3352 Pitney Bowes email: hulbe...@pb.com P.O. Box 3000

Re[2]: Shielded power cord, seeking source for

to that effect in the operating instructions for the equipment. (BTW, a good source for shielded and filtered cordsets is EMC/EUPEN, tel: 908-919-1100.) Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes __ Reply Separator _ Subject: RE

Re: Application of Directives

. Jim Hulbert Senior Engineer-EMC Pitney Bowes __ Reply Separator _ Subject: Application of Directives Author: Chris Dupres chris_dup...@compuserve.com at SMTPGWY List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date

Re: Method CS114

Quick civics lesson: The 4th protects us from search and seizure without a warrant. I think you mean the 5th, which says you can't be compelled to testify against yourself. __ Forward Header __ Subject: Re:

EN50091-2

it will take me a week or so to get a copy, can someone briefly fill me in on what's in this standard? What tests are required? Thanks for your help. __ Jim Hulbert

RE: C Tick..

One further note: I believe a U.S. lab that is accredited by either AALA or NVLAP is considered a certified lab under mutual recognition agreement. However, I'm not sure of the current status of the MRA. Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes -- Forwarded by Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI

Re: EN 55024 Question

a relaxation of the requirements. Can this really be happening? Jim Hulbert Sr. Engineer - EMC Pitney Bowes rbus...@es.com on 06/22/99 12:07:46 PM Please respond to rbus...@es.com To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org cc:(bcc: Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI) Subject: EN 55024 Question

EN 61000-3-2

. That, I believe, should be the intent of the standard. I would like to know how others interpret this paragraph of the standard and how this test is being performed. (Is anyone actually doing this test yet for ITE??) Jim Hulbert Senior Engineer - EMC Pitney Bowes - This message is coming

Re: Printed Circuit Board Grounding

Douglas C. Smith d...@dsmith.org on 10/08/99 09:29:25 PM Please respond to Douglas C. Smith d...@dsmith.org To: UMBDENSTOCK, DON umbdenst...@sensormatic.com cc: 'EMC-PSTC Discussion Group' emc-p...@ieee.org (bcc: Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI) Subject: Re: Printed Circuit Board Grounding

EN50082-1:1997 EN55024

current-voltage characteristics are also non-linear. How do others approach these tests? Are we adding unnecessary test time by starting at lower test voltages and stepping our way up or are the test labs that go straight to the maximum test levels overlooking an important aspect of the testing? Jim

Question on internal ESD testing

that EN 55024 also states specifically that you are not expected to discharge to exposed connector pins. I guess that would, in fact, be egregious. Jim Hulbert Senior Engineer - EMC Pitney Bowes -- Forwarded by Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI on 08/13/99 02:55 PM

Re: FCC Contact

Try sending an email to oeti...@fcc.gov. I've received responses to questions within 1 day. Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes rehel...@mmm.com

Re: ESD Testing Method

question, if you apply +8kV discharge followed by -8kV discharge, without removing the charge from the EUT between the discharges, then the actual potential voltage is 16kV which could very well overstress the product. Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes

EN 61000-3-3 + A1

or is there a simpler way? Thanks. Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your

EN55022:1998/CISPR22:1997 + A1:2000

definition of the ferrite devices. Does anyone have any updated information on the status of this amendment, which if it goes through as is, must be met by August of 2003? Thanks. Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product

EN 55022:1998 vs. ANSI C63.4

. AC mains, telecom, I/O to remote control units). ANSI C63.4 does not specify this. If I follow the EN 55022 procedure, is it necessary to repeat without the ferrite clamps in order to satisfy the ANSI test procedure? Thanks. Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes

RE: FCC part 15 section 109

Sorry, I meant whichever is LOWER. (Can't get away with ANYTHING on this forum!) - Forwarded by Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI on 03/27/2002 08:27 AM

RE: FCC part 15 section 109

(or 40 GHz, whichever is greater) for highest frequency generated above 1000 MHz. Jim Hulbert Senior Engineer Pitney Bowes rehel...@mmm.com

[PSES] Machinery Safety Regulations in Canada

a regulatory requirement in Ontario, are there other provinces that have the same or similar regulation? Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes - This message is from

Re: [PSES] Curious Situation in Italian Customs

The Declaration of Conformity must be issued by the Manufacturer or the Manufacturer's authorized representative. TUV (any of them) CAN'T issue the Declaration for you.Maybe there is something about your Declaration that is not correct and customs is being picky about it. Jim Hulbert

Re: [PSES] SV: [PSES] New EMC Directive

But there are also retailers who do NOT have shops/stores but only sell on-line. So I think the definition of retailer is becoming murkier. Jim -Original Message- From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 2:15 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

[PSES] EN 60204-1 Degrees of Protection

if the installation environment is sufficiently controlled? Any thoughts on this are appreciated. Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion

[PSES] In-Situ EMC Testing in Canada

ICES-003 is the Industry Canada standard for emissions testing of ITE (CISPR 22). For very large ITE that cannot be tested on an open area test site, is there a provision for testing in-situ? Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes

[PSES] New EU Directives

I will of course investigate on my own. But is anything shockingly changed in the new EMC, LVD, and RTTE Directives? Or for most of us will it simply mean updating our Declarations of Conformity? Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes

[PSES] Translation of EU Declaration

The re-cast EMCD and LVD both state that the EU declaration must be translated into the language required by a member state into which the apparatus is to be made available. Does that mean a product sold throughout the EU must have a declaration translated into all 20+ languages? Jim Hulbert

Re: [PSES] Definition of unsafe product

and provide the evidence because we couldn't afford to have this shipment held up any longer. My point here is that I think Customs overstepped their authority. Jim Hulbert - This message is from

Re: [PSES] Definition of unsafe product

This was in regard to the LVD. Jim -Original Message- From: Crane, Lauren [mailto:lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 3:33 PM To: Jim Hulbert; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] Definition of unsafe product Jim, Was this for an EMCD issue, or other

Re: [PSES] Definition of unsafe product

OK. So I guess this would be a reasonable request from the authorities. Lesson learned: make sure DoC's are up-to-date to avoid delays. -Original Message- From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 3:35 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject:

Re: [PSES] construction machinery in USA

always make sense. Jim Hulbert -Original Message- From: T.Sato [mailto:vef00...@nifty.ne.jp] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:20 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] construction machinery in USA On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:26:23 +, Ted Eckert ted.eck...@microsoft.com

[PSES] Disconnect power before servicing label required?

for the manuals, but I don't see a requirement for it to be on a label. Is it acceptable to have the instruction in the manual only? Thanks. Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes - This message is from the IEEE

Re: [PSES] Disconnect power before servicing label required?

Thanks for the replies. This product only has a single external power source, so no label is required. (And yes, Boštjan, I meant appliance inlet, not outlet). Jim From: Jim Hulbert [mailto:jim.hulb...@pb.com] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 1:09 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject

Re: [PSES] Nameplate and DoC requirements Machinery Directive

Does the signature on a DoC need to be original or would an digital (or scanned) signature be acceptable? Jim Hulbert -Original Message- From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 1:40 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Nameplate

[PSES] EN61000-6-11 and EN61000-6-12 Applicability

circumstances is a system considered private? Thanks - Jim Hulbert - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e

[PSES] EN61000-3-11 and EN61000-3-12 Applicability

system (standards do not apply). Under what circumstances is a system considered private? Thanks - Jim Hulbert - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc

[PSES] Can Safety Related Instructions be On Line Only?

has to be printed. So I guess the question is, is it OK to go 100% electronic? Thanks. Jim Hulbert - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list

[PSES] Branch and Supplementary Overload Protection

our machine or is supplementary protection sufficient? If we do need branch protection in the machine itself, is it sufficient only for the main disconnect at the power input? Are there differences in the requirements for U.S. and Europe? Thanks. Jim Hulbert

[PSES] EU Pressure Equipment Requirements

Vessel Directive applies to the tank. However, I'm not so sure that the PED applies since the equipment is part of and totally contained within another system. Any insight would be appreciated. Jim Hulbert

[PSES] EN 61000-3-3:2013

are generally reacting (essentially are people re-testing or not). Thanks. Jim Hulbert - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message

Re: [PSES] 2014/35/EU Requirement for Postal Address

the party who's name/brand appears on the product. The importer is the party who places equipment from outside the EU onto the EU market. Jim Hulbert From: peter_kelle...@dell.com [mailto:peter_kelle...@dell.com] Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 6:58 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re

Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] [PSES] AU CISPR 22 Class B Interpretation

The FCC also exempts a digital device utilized exclusively in an appliance, e.g., microwave oven, dishwasher, clothes dryer, air conditioner (central or window), from the its Part 15 technical requirements, so being rational doesn't always make sense. Jim Hulbert -Original Message

[PSES] In-situ testing of Machines for CE Mark

shipping into the EU prior to CE marking, so how would customs be handled? Thanks for any insight. Jim Hulbert - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discuss

Re: [PSES] EU's new approach directive transitions

I didn't realize RED isn't mandatory until 2017. But that is indeed in the transition clause. Takes a little pressure off some of us who didn't realize that. Jim Hulbert From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 2:34 AM To: EMC-PSTC

[PSES] Papua New Guinea Regulatory Requirements

tion function. I am looking for requirements for commercial products, not consumer. Does anyone know of any requirements that I'm overlooking? Thanks. Jim Hulbert - This message is from the

Re: [PSES] Papua New Guinea Regulatory Requirements

red button from a previous message. From: Jim Hulbert [mailto:jim.hulb...@pb.com] Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 10:39 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Subject: [PSES] Papua New Guinea Regulatory Requirements I've been asked if there are any regulatory req

Re: [PSES] Not Our Area Question

. They shall apply those provisions from 22 July 2019. Jim Hulbert - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e

[PSES] EU Enforcement of CE Marking Directives

am most interested in the EMC, LVD, MD, and R Directives. Thank you. Jim Hulbert - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message

[PSES] Percentage Fill of Electrical Raceway in Machinery

on raceway fill. I have had an NRTL engineer cite a non-conformance for a raceway that was too full. I argued that the cables were just low voltage signal cables but it didn't make a difference to this engineer. We ended up using a larger raceway. Any thoughts? Jim Hulbert

Re: [PSES] Automated vehicles.

So a Mercedes automated vehicle would make the decision of who lives and who dies. That’s incredible. Jim Hulbert From: Pawson, James [mailto:james.paw...@echostar.com] Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 6:23 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Automated vehicles. This article

  1   2   >