Re: [E-devel] server down

And now it's back. The revenant never disappoint us! On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 7:29 PM Hermet Park wrote: > Dead now again. > > This server is self-restorative but very dangerous than Wolverine. > > On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 3:40 AM Mike Blumenkrantz < > michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>

Re: [E-devel] server down

Dead now again. This server is self-restorative but very dangerous than Wolverine. On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 3:40 AM Mike Blumenkrantz < michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dead now, too. > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:55 AM Mike Blumenkrantz < > michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >

Re: [E-devel] server down

Dead now, too. On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:55 AM Mike Blumenkrantz < michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Server dead again. > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 7:47 AM Marcel Hollerbach wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Server is dead again since 20 min. Getting 503 page. >> >> This was also already yesterday

Re: [E-devel] server down

Server dead again. On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 7:47 AM Marcel Hollerbach wrote: > Hi, > > Server is dead again since 20 min. Getting 503 page. > > This was also already yesterday the case, at roughly the same time. It > came back after 30 min. or something close to this. Anything we can do > to not

Re: [E-devel] server down

Hi, Server is dead again since 20 min. Getting 503 page. This was also already yesterday the case, at roughly the same time. It came back after 30 min. or something close to this. Anything we can do to not have that ? Greetings, bu5hm4n On 7/11/19 8:21 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Tue,

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 19:46:25 +0100 Bertrand Jacquin said: > Hey, > > Looking at this, it seems everything is in order. Can you confirm ? Actually... the git mailing list seems to be dropping lots of mails (lots of commits not getting mails going out - a few made i though) :( > Cheers > > On

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 19:46:25 +0100 Bertrand Jacquin said: > Hey, > > Looking at this, it seems everything is in order. Can you confirm ? It magically started working on Monday... It just had some issues with disk full of logs - i cleared them out (on phab.e.org) > Cheers > > On Tue, Jul 02,

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 3:46 PM Bertrand Jacquin wrote: > Hey, > > Looking at this, it seems everything is in order. Can you confirm ? > > Phab was working fine earlier today but since ~30min ago I'm getting HTTP 500 (Internal Server Error) complaining about not being able to connect to MySQL.

Re: [E-devel] server down

Hey, Looking at this, it seems everything is in order. Can you confirm ? Cheers On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 09:48:20AM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Mon, 01 Jul 2019 21:52:37 +0300 Bertrand Jacquin > said: > > > I can't do anything. Same situation it has always been with e6: > > 9:46AM

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 15:30:05 + Jonathan Aquilina said: > Hi Guys, > > I would open a ticket with OUOSL to have them give the server a kick in the > rump This is not with OSUOSL or I'd be able to do something. It's beber's machine/setup. I don't know where it physically lives or how it's

Re: [E-devel] server down

Hi Guys, I would open a ticket with OUOSL to have them give the server a kick in the rump Regards, Jonathan On 02/07/2019, 10:49, "Carsten Haitzler" wrote: On Mon, 01 Jul 2019 21:52:37 +0300 Bertrand Jacquin said: I can't do anything. Same situation it has always been

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Mon, 01 Jul 2019 21:52:37 +0300 Bertrand Jacquin said: I can't do anything. Same situation it has always been with e6: 9:46AM ~ > ssh e6.enlightenment.org Permission denied (publickey). 9:46AM ~ > ssh e6v1.enlightenment.org packet_write_wait: Connection to 163.172.114.208 port 22: Broken

Re: [E-devel] server down

Hi Marcel, Thanks for taking this initiative, it's great to be able to continue with work in these trying times. Regards, Mike On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 21:27:41 +0200 Marcel Hollerbach wrote: > Hi, > > in order to support work until the server is restored, i have > un-archived:

Re: [E-devel] server down

Hi, in order to support work until the server is restored, i have un-archived: https://github.com/Enlightenment/efl-tmp. If someone with an devel account on e.org wants to have access, let me know. Greetings, bu5hm4n On 7/1/19 8:52 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote: > > Hey, > > Je suis en

Re: [E-devel] server down

Hey, Je suis en vacances cette semaine, je vais pas pouvoir m'en occuper avant mardi prochain. Est ce que raster peut regarder ? -- BertrandOn 30 Jun 2019 17:27, Boris Faure wrote: > > Hi :) > > Server looks down again. > I can't push to terminology's git, phab and the website all look

[E-devel] server down

Hi :) Server looks down again. I can't push to terminology's git, phab and the website all look down. I hope you'll be able to fix it soon. -- Boris Faure Pointer Arithmetician signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ enlightenment-devel mailing

Re: [E-devel] Server Down

On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 16:04:19 + Mike Blumenkrantz said: > Apparently we are doing maintenance during core business hours? During ALL of my core business hours too! Who cares about your business hours! :) >

Re: [E-devel] Server Down

We've moved on to the maintenance business. Didn't you get the memo? 2017-08-24 19:04 GMT+03:00 Mike Blumenkrantz : > Apparently we are doing maintenance during core business hours? > -- >

[E-devel] Server Down

Apparently we are doing maintenance during core business hours? -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

Re: [E-devel] Server down

On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:30:11 + Andrew Williams said: > Seems fine with me too - thanks. cool. i hadn't noticed anything... but once a week things might be down for a few mins in the weekly e5v1 reboot that seems to be needed. but that's it. i think that's acceptable

Re: [E-devel] Server down

>>>> 4096 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> too > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and then > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it worked. what machine is that? > >>>>>>&

Re: [E-devel] Server down

t;>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Re: [E-devel] Server down

Seems fine with me too - thanks. On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 at 12:22, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > On 08/21/2017 12:09 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 08:40:02 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > > said: > > >

Re: [E-devel] Server down

Hello. On 08/21/2017 12:09 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 08:40:02 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) said: any complaints now? ... servers now seem stable. cron.daily + logrotate was causing the issues. Not from my side. I started

Re: [E-devel] Server down

as...@rasterman.com> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > On Mon,

Re: [E-devel] Server down

> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > a...@andywilliams.me> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > said: > > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > &g

Re: [E-devel] Server down

> > > > >> > >>>> working. > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > ssh > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > works for me... i currently don't know why you > > >

Re: [E-devel] Server down

> > >> > >>>> > > issues... :/ > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > No, I have no proxy commands set up. I have > > no > > > > &

Re: [E-devel] Server down

; no > > > > > > >> peculiarity in > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > networking. > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > The physical location and method of

Re: [E-devel] Server down

t;>> works for me... i currently don't know why you are > >> having > >>>>> ssh > >>>>>>>>>>>> issues... :/ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>

Re: [E-devel] Server down

From: Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> Date: 15/07/2017 22:59 (GMT+01:00) To: Jonathan Aquilina <jaquil...@eagleeyet.net , Enlightenment developer list < enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [E-devel] Server down Correction, for git I'm getting either con

Re: [E-devel] Server down

t;>> as I > > > > > >> > >>>> > > have > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > been > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > usi

Re: [E-devel] Server down

was unreliable > at > > > best > > > > >> and > > > > >> > >>>> got > > > > >> > >>>> > > worse as > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > Saturday wore on. > > > > >

Re: [E-devel] Server down

gt;>> > > > > rejected. > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > Other times I got no response. > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > Additionally I was not

Re: [E-devel] Server down

ot no response. > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > Additionally I was not the only one. Those on IRC > were > > >> > >>>> agreeing that > > >> > >>

Re: [E-devel] Server down

; >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 at 08:33 Carsten Haitzler < > >> > >>>> ras...@rasterman.com> > >> > >>>> > > > > wrote: >

Re: [E-devel] Server down

...@rasterman.com> >> > >>>> > > > > wrote: >> > >>>> > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 23:32:25 + Andrew Williams < >> > >>>> > > > >

Re: [E-devel] Server down

t; > > > > Hi, > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > After an hour of trying to get through to our git > server > > >>>> I'm now > > >>>> > > > > giving

Re: [E-devel] Server down

> >>>> > > > > giving > >>>> > > > > > > up > >>>> > > > > > > > for the night. > >>>> > > > > > > > I understand that there is an unknown problem that needs > &g

Re: [E-devel] Server down

; to be >>>> > > > > gotten to >>>> > > > > > > > the bottom of but I don't understand why those who were >>>> able to >>>> > > help >>>> > > > > no >>>> > > > > > >

Re: [E-devel] Server down

ho were >>> able to >>> > > help >>> > > > > no >>> > > > > > > > longer have access. >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Can someon

Re: [E-devel] Server down

> are so >> > > > > many >> > > > > > > free >> > > > > > > > hosting solutions for open source projects I don't get it - >> we >> > > were >> > > > > > > afraid >&

Re: [E-devel] Server down

t; > > > > > > > hosting solutions for open source projects I don't get it - > we > > > were > > > > > > > afraid > > > > > > > > of the stability of "the new sourceforge" but GitHub, despite > > > high >

Re: [E-devel] Server down

t;>>>>>> hosting solutions for open source projects I don't get it - we >> were >>>>>> afraid >>>>>>> of the stability of "the new sourceforge" but GitHub, despite >> high >>>>>>> criticism for its downtime, has bee

Re: [E-devel] Server down

2 > > days > > > > over > > > > > > the > > > > > > > last 2 years... > > > > > > > > > > > > do you have a proxy thing for git.e.org in your ssh config. i can > > get > > > > to > > >

Re: [E-devel] Server down

> > > the > > > > > > last 2 years... > > > > > > > > > > do you have a proxy thing for git.e.org in your ssh config. i can > get > > > to > > > > > git.e.org no problems. all weekend. i didn't have issues. my > email was &g

Re: [E-devel] Server down

t; On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 at 22:41, jaquilina <jaquil...@eagleeyet.net> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > All I know is that beber adding my ssh key to the system and > > > > reencrypted > > > > > > the credentials store w

Re: [E-devel] Server down

arate issue)... > > > > > > > Andy > > > > On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 at 22:41, jaquilina <jaquil...@eagleeyet.net> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > All I know is that beber adding my ssh key to the system and > > > reencrypted > >

Re: [E-devel] Server down

re which could be the root cause of these issues > > with > > > > git over ssh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from Samsung tablet. > > > > Original message > > > > From: Andrew Williams &

Re: [E-devel] Server down

> > Original message ---- > > > From: Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> > > > Date: 15/07/2017 22:59 (GMT+01:00) > > > To: Jonathan Aquilina <jaquil...@eagleeyet.net>, Enlightenment > developer > > > list <enlightenm

Re: [E-devel] Server down

On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 10:26:04 + Andrew Williams said: > Hi, > > That's the server keeled over again. I would fix it but today it's > rejecting my login. server isn't down... it's just rejecting you for some reason - are you doing the proxy command thing to get to git?

Re: [E-devel] Server down

GMT+01:00) > > To: Jonathan Aquilina <jaquil...@eagleeyet.net>, Enlightenment developer > > list <enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > > Subject: Re: [E-devel] Server down > > > > Correction, for git I'm getting either connection closed or permission > >

Re: [E-devel] Server down

ystem and reencrypted > >>>> the credentials store which could be the root cause of these issues with > >>>> git over ssh > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Sent from Samsung tablet. > >>>> Ori

Re: [E-devel] Server down

use of these issues with git over ssh Sent from Samsung tablet. Original message From: Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> Date: 15/07/2017 22:59 (GMT+01:00) To: Jonathan Aquilina <jaquil...@eagleeyet.net>, Enlightenment developer list <enlightenment-devel@l

Re: [E-devel] Server down

which could be the root cause of these issues with >>> git over ssh >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from Samsung tablet. >>> Original message >>> From: Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> >>> Date: 15/07/2017 22:59 (GMT+

Re: [E-devel] Server down

t; >> >> >> Sent from Samsung tablet. >> Original message >> From: Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> >> Date: 15/07/2017 22:59 (GMT+01:00) >> To: Jonathan Aquilina <jaquil...@eagleeyet.net>, Enlightenment developer >> list <enli

Re: [E-devel] Server down

es with > git over ssh > > > > Sent from Samsung tablet. > Original message > From: Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> > Date: 15/07/2017 22:59 (GMT+01:00) > To: Jonathan Aquilina <jaquil...@eagleeyet.net>, Enlightenment developer > list <

Re: [E-devel] Server down

(GMT+01:00) To: Jonathan Aquilina <jaquil...@eagleeyet.net>, Enlightenment developer list <enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [E-devel] Server down Correction, for git I'm getting either connection closed or permission denied... every 5th or so connection makes

Re: [E-devel] Server down

Correction, for git I'm getting either connection closed or permission denied... every 5th or so connection makes it through. On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 at 20:46, Andrew Williams wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks to whoever prodded it. Now git and web are working again. > I use git+ssh and

Re: [E-devel] Server down

Hi, Thanks to whoever prodded it. Now git and web are working again. I use git+ssh and it is working OK (on and off actually) but I can't get in through ssh any more. Bu5hm4n and others have noted the same thing. Have permissions on SSH been altered? Thanks, Andy On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 at 15:06

Re: [E-devel] Server down

I think that it might be worth contacting the hosting provider as I am wondering if they are doing something with their network hardware or maybe something that is causing our server to really not be happy. --- Regards, Jonathan Aquilina On 2017-07-15 15:59, Derek Foreman wrote: > Somewhat

Re: [E-devel] Server down

Somewhat related, I've been monitoring the server with "smokeping" for a few weeks now, and the majority of the blackouts start between 5AM and 5:10AM north american central time (10ish UTC I guess?) Sometimes they clear in under an hour (I don't know if this is an automatic recovery or

Re: [E-devel] Server down

Same for me, and i was able to access it last week... Now i am getting: "Permission denied (publickey)" On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 10:26:04AM +, Andrew Williams wrote: > Hi, > > That's the server keeled over again. I would fix it but today it's > rejecting my login. > > Can someone please

[E-devel] Server down

Hi, That's the server keeled over again. I would fix it but today it's rejecting my login. Can someone please help, I was in the middle of a bunch of work on docuwiki that I would like to complete? Thanks, Andy -- http://andywilliams.me http://ajwillia.ms

Re: [E-devel] server down

Server is down again. Git push is throwing errors. Can someone reboot the server? On Jun 21, 2017 20:46, "Stefan Schmidt" wrote: > Hello. > > On 06/09/2017 02:15 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > i'm also getting impatient. at e dev day in 2 weeks lets

Re: [E-devel] server down

Hello. On 06/09/2017 02:15 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: i'm also getting impatient. at e dev day in 2 weeks lets sort this out and actually get something done there and then. tbh i think at this point this is more important than just about any other topic there... and not to

Re: [E-devel] server down

Hello. On 06/11/2017 06:07 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 19:51:27 +0930 Simon Lees said: On 10/06/17 15:20, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Good Morning All, There is lots of food for thought in this thread. Here is some food for thought. What

Re: [E-devel] server down

Hello. On 06/12/2017 01:34 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: On Sun, 11 Jun 2017 19:39:30 + Andrew Williams said: I think here it's recommended to split the ui from the agents. Your windows agent vm going down should not be an issue for the ui - only some

Re: [E-devel] server down

On 12/06/17 20:47, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > I like the rolling nature of gentoo, but also the ability to lock > yourself at certain software versions. But for sure the current setup > has a major misconfiguration issue somewhere and I am determined to get > to the bottom of it for sure. Just

Re: [E-devel] server down

I like the rolling nature of gentoo, but also the ability to lock yourself at certain software versions. But for sure the current setup has a major misconfiguration issue somewhere and I am determined to get to the bottom of it for sure. Just need beber to give me access to the system. ---

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Sun, 2017-06-11 at 13:07 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 19:51:27 +0930 Simon Lees said: > > > > > > > On 10/06/17 15:20, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > > Good Morning All,  > > > > > > There is lots of food for thought in this thread.  > > > > > > Here

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 11:27:59 +0300 Vasiliy Tolstov said: > 2017-06-12 2:41 GMT+03:00 Carsten Haitzler : > > you can't. by definition a container SHARED the same linux kernel as the > > host. the kernel divides resources up container by container so for

Re: [E-devel] server down

2017-06-12 2:41 GMT+03:00 Carsten Haitzler : > you can't. by definition a container SHARED the same linux kernel as the host. > the kernel divides resources up container by container so for example /proc > only contains processes from one container and not others etc. ...

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Sun, 11 Jun 2017 19:39:30 + Andrew Williams said: > I think here it's recommended to split the ui from the agents. Your windows > agent vm going down should not be an issue for the ui - only some builds > would fail. That way Jenkins main could be containerised. oh

Re: [E-devel] server down

orge.net> > Subject: Re: [E-devel] server down I think here it's recommended to split the > ui from the agents. Your windows agent vm going down should not be an issue > for the ui - only some builds would fail. That way Jenkins main could be > containerised. > > Andy >

Re: [E-devel] server down

I wonder if we could run Windows in a container.  Sent from Samsung tablet. Original message From: Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> Date: 11/06/2017 21:39 (GMT+01:00) To: Enlightenment developer list <enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject:

Re: [E-devel] server down

I think here it's recommended to split the ui from the agents. Your windows agent vm going down should not be an issue for the ui - only some builds would fail. That way Jenkins main could be containerised. Andy On Sun, 11 Jun 2017 at 03:53, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Sun, 11 Jun 2017 06:57:58 +0200 Jonathan Aquilina said: > For Jenkins would docker containers work? not for windows, bsd etc. (non-linux based os's). > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 11 Jun 2017, at 06:07, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > >

Re: [E-devel] server down

For Jenkins would docker containers work? Sent from my iPhone > On 11 Jun 2017, at 06:07, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 19:51:27 +0930 Simon Lees said: > >> >> >>> On 10/06/17 15:20, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: >>>

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 19:51:27 +0930 Simon Lees said: > > > On 10/06/17 15:20, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > Good Morning All, > > > > There is lots of food for thought in this thread. > > > > Here is some food for thought. What about using a microservices > > management

Re: [E-devel] server down

On 10/06/17 15:20, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Good Morning All, > > There is lots of food for thought in this thread. > > Here is some food for thought. What about using a microservices > management platform such as puppet for example to manage everything on > the primary server as well as

Re: [E-devel] server down

Good Morning All, There is lots of food for thought in this thread. If beber does not have time and is willing to hand over total control to the infra to me I am more than willing to work on things as admin. I understand everyone wants to simplify things tremendously and I have to agree

Re: [E-devel] server down

On 10/06/17 01:25, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 00:29:51 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> > > Gentoo does not provide pre-build kernels. Other than on livecd. There > is a reason. Gentoo is for extremely experienced administrators

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 00:29:51 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > gentoo has other issues like packages failing to install due to build > errors (and trying to fix that takes 5, 10+ minutes each try as it's > "build all the dependencies.. oh wait.. it still

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:27:47 -0400 "William L. Thomson Jr." said: > On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 16:49:17 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > > in this thread it's all about "just move to the cloud! and everything > > will be fine"... if the only

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 16:49:17 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > in this thread it's all about "just move to the cloud! and everything > will be fine"... if the only view is "run away run away" and not > actually fix the problem at the core (its a kernel bug

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 22:03:28 -0700 Cedric BAIL said: > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Andrew Williams wrote: > > "Simply not possible" is complete nonsense. We have a lot of intelligent > > people on this list and replication is not an intangible

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Fri, 09 Jun 2017 02:24:52 + Andrew Williams said: > "Simply not possible" is complete nonsense. We have a lot of intelligent good luck having git failover work where some commits are still pending in one repo and not in another and reconcile those every day... you

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Fri, 09 Jun 2017 06:52:30 +0200 Jonathan Aquilina said: > Carsten, I have expressed interest to help as an admin, but given the i know. but in this thread it's all "just move to the cloud and everything will be fine". it's a total distraction from the real issue.

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 21:10:48 -0400 "William L. Thomson Jr." said: > On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 09:15:14 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > > not a single person here ever says "hey - i'll help migrate it to a > > container on e5 and figure it

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Andrew Williams wrote: >> "Simply not possible" is complete nonsense. We have a lot of intelligent >> people on this list and replication is not an intangible problem

Re: [E-devel] server down

On 09/06/17 14:22, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Carsten, I have expressed interest to help as an admin, but given the > complex undocumented nature of the current setup and beber needing me to > have a pgp which I only just got in all honesty Im scared to touch the > server. Like others have said

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Andrew Williams wrote: > "Simply not possible" is complete nonsense. We have a lot of intelligent > people on this list and replication is not an intangible problem any more. > How it's set up at the moment may make it harder but I think we're

Re: [E-devel] server down

Carsten, I have expressed interest to help as an admin, but given the complex undocumented nature of the current setup and beber needing me to have a pgp which I only just got in all honesty Im scared to touch the server. Like others have said we need to simplify things and get rid of all this

Re: [E-devel] server down

"Simply not possible" is complete nonsense. We have a lot of intelligent people on this list and replication is not an intangible problem any more. How it's set up at the moment may make it harder but I think we're agreed that something needs to change. The concept of any organisation running all

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 09:15:14 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > not a single person here ever says "hey - i'll help migrate it to a > container on e5 and figure it out". it's always "hey hey - come over > here and use the vm/container/whatever hosting provider

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Thu, 08 Jun 2017 18:17:32 + Andrew Williams said: > Hi team, > > I get that the server itself is not problematic but can we please agree > that redundancy would be a good thing? > There is no way that we should be comfortable with a single issue be able > to take

Re: [E-devel] server down

On Thu, 08 Jun 2017 20:51:59 +0200 Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Andrew I do agree totally with you there. If need be i will sponsor > another server with another provider if need be. If I still had my private cloud on my hardware I would donate resources. At this time I

Re: [E-devel] server down

Andrew I do agree totally with you there. If need be i will sponsor another server with another provider if need be. --- Regards, Jonathan Aquilina On 2017-06-08 20:17, Andrew Williams wrote: > Hi team, > > I get that the server itself is not problematic but can we please agree > that

Re: [E-devel] server down

Hi team, I get that the server itself is not problematic but can we please agree that redundancy would be a good thing? There is no way that we should be comfortable with a single issue be able to take out our entire infrastructure. Thanks, Andrew On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 at 06:39 Carsten Haitzler

  1   2   >