ct ...
IMHO keeping the preference in all future ESR (major) versions would be
the acceptable plan for enterprise environments
Thanks
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe fr
this option remain in all future ESR releases
Thanks
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
or send
James Pearson wrote:
We've been using the RHEL/CentOS Totem plug-ins with Firefox 38 ESR
(Mozilla supplied Firefox binaries) to play various movies without a
problem on CentOS 6
However, these plug-ins don't (fully) work with Firefox 45 ESR - they
work if I use a 'file://...' URL to load
eral plugin policy"
Will that still be the case with major releases after 52/ESR52 ?
Thanks
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
htt
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le 22/12/2016 à 15:50, James Pearson a écrit :
>> Will there be a beta of ESR 52 available before ESR 52 is released?
> For now, we are not planning to do beta builds for ESR52.
> We consider that 52.0esr and 52.1esr will give enough time to test and fix
&
James Pearson wrote:
>
> I notice the first 'tinderbox-builds' of ESR 52 have appeared under:
>
>http://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/tinderbox-builds/
>
> However, this build only supports the Flash plugin - the code to allow
> non-Flash NPAPI plugins hasn't bee
;en-GB");
which will make this the default for all users
(you might want to use defaultPref() or lockPref() instead, depending on
how you want to manage this)
No idea if this is the 'right' way of doing this, but it works for me ...
James Pearson
_
the proxy server when I want to open a e-journals web site. What
could be the problem?
You probably need to import the Root CA certificate(s) for the proxy
server (via the Authorities import) instead
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
David Stupple wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to this list. I am trying to deploy Firefox ESR 45 with
> included autoconfig.js and Mozilla.cfg files. When I attempt to
> deploy to the latest version of Yosemite, the application is
> installed correctly but it seems unable to assign the appropriate
>
James Pearson wrote:
We've just moved to ESR 45 from ESR 38 on a number of Macs, but are
having problems playing back Quicktime videos - the 'error' is 'Video
can't be played because the file is corrupt'
However, setting the preference media.mp4.enabled to false, allows these
Quicktimes play
/flashplayer.html
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
or send an email to enterprise-requ
type is treated as MP4 media to be handled by the built-in HTML5
video player. But MOV files can contain a variety of different
encodings, they are not all MP4.
Does anyone know of a work around for this problem with ESR 45 ?
Thanks
James Pearson
James Pearson wrote:
It looks like this is a bug/regression that was introduced in Firefox 45
- and a fix was added to Firefox 47 (BZ # 1251184
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1251184>)
I've updated BZ #1251184 to see if the fix can be added to ESR 45 - are
there any M
James Pearson wrote:
James Pearson wrote:
It looks like this is a bug/regression that was introduced in Firefox 45
- and a fix was added to Firefox 47 (BZ # 1251184
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1251184>)
I've updated BZ #1251184 to see if the fix can be added to
autoconfig settings
Also is it possible to add certificates in Firefox automatically from
the IE?
You can add certificates by using CCK2 <https://mike.kaply.com/cck2/>
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
to access
the Internet
James Pearson
From: Pray, Roger [roger.p...@bassett.org]
Sent: 02 November 2016 20:12
To: 'enterprise@mozilla.org'
Subject: [Mozilla Enterprise] FireFox not working for HTTPS sites
We’ve had FireFox deployed in our Enterprise for quite
directly. Currently I am using ip addresses of
the websites in configuration file of IKEv2 server as leftsubnets. Anyone have
better recomendations?
You might want to look into a PAC/WPAD set up - e.g. see:
http://findproxyforurl.com/
James Pearson
52 and FF 52 - which include support for all NPAPI plug-ins (other
than just Flash) and continued support for unsigned extensions
Therefore, it would be good to get a beta release of ESR 52 when the FF
52 beta is available
Thanks
James Pearson
able to do this for you - see https://mike.kaply.com/cck2/
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
SR 52 browsers - but there
doesn't appear to be a way of telling 'Firefox 52' and 'Firefox ESR 52'
apart via the User Agent string ...
If you 'fake' your User Agent string (to pretend to be a previous
version of Firefox), then that page will load with ESR 52
James Pearson
_
Aspoeck, Torben wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it is possible to deactivate the following security notification within the
> config file or somewhere else?
Try setting the following preference to false:
security.insecure_field_warning.contextual.enabled
J
these extensions will no longer work with future releases of
Firefox anyway?
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
https://mail.mozilla.org
Harji, Menesh:
>
> I am trying to add this on the cfg file but the below does not work as the
> Brower does not open.
> This is from the sample code from the website
>
> // Disable the internal PDF viewer
> pref("pdfjs.disabled", true);]
The ']' character sh
If you go to about:buildconfig, the 'Built from' URL for 52.1.0esr-candidates
build1 should be (I believe):
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-esr52/rev/7beb59bc3482523ad6811fd3984949204d763810
James Pearson
From: Jim Weill [moon
layMenuBar": true,
"dontCheckDefaultBrowser": true,
"disableCrashReporter": true,
"disableTelemetry": true,
...
"bookmarks": mybookmarks,
...
"certs": {
"ca": [
{
...
};
If you are hacking a CCK2 cfg file
to work
I haven't needed Widevine - but I guess something similar may work ?
Location of the download from:
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-esr52/file/tip/toolkit/content/gmp-sources/widevinecdm.json
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing lis
The original question was is there a way to have
'security.insecure_password.ui.enabled' only be 'false' for certain
hosts/domains ...
I believe the answer is no (with or without CCK2)
James Pearson
Kaply Consulting wrote:
> For that, all you can do is change a prefere
n if you set
xpinstall.signatures.required' to 'false' ?
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or s
/52.2.0esr-candidates/build1/linux-x86_64/
My central autoconf cfg file has:
pref("media.gmp-gmpopenh264.autoupdate", false);
pref("media.gmp-gmpopenh264.enabled", true);
defaultPref("media.gmp-gmpopenh264.version", "system-installed");
James Pearson
_
the Path given in
about:plugins - and then it does work ...
Not sure why Firefox says it's installed when it actually isn't -
possibly a 'bug' or 'feature' ?
I guess I had just assumed it was working previously :-)
Thanks
James Pearson
___
Enter
ileUtils.getDir("GreD", ["browser",
> "plugins", "gmp-gmpopenh264", "system-installed"]).path);
> lockPref("media.gmp-gmpopenh264.autoupdate", false);
> defaultPref("media.gmp-gmpo
TK 3 - FF 53 and above don't support building with GTK 2
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterp
er
'Quantum' is (I'm guessing 'Quantum' is just a marketing term ???)
Mozilla do not backport major changes to an ESR series, so minor ESR
version changes will only have security fixes (and possibly the odd bug
fix) applied
i.e. ESR 52.5.0 will not contain any of the 'Quantum' changes with
Firef
i.e. only those that _really_ want to sign up will follow the list link
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
https://mail.moz
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>
> On 29/11/2017 10:56, James Pearson wrote:
>
>> I believe the 'problem' is the web page at:
>>
>>https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/
>>
>> This is the page that most people will arrive at when sear
James Pearson wrote:
>>
>>> I believe the 'problem' is the web page at:
>>>
>>> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/
>>>
>>> This is the page that most people will arrive at when searching for info
>>> about the ESR
James Pearson wrote:
>
> If anyone is interested, Mozilla have made available a 'screenshot' of
> the proposed replacement page for
> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/ at:
>
>https://screenshots.firefox.com/lUwglCpTWahzqgkZ/127.0.0.1
>
> This al
James Pearson wrote:
>
>> We will be publishing an ESR 52.5.2 probably tomorrow. We were not
>> happy with 52.5.1 and we decided to postpone it.
>
> OK - thanks for the info
Looks like ESR 52.5.2 has now been released
However, in common with previous 'minor.minor' r
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>
> We will be publishing an ESR 52.5.2 probably tomorrow. We were not
> happy with 52.5.1 and we decided to postpone it.
OK - thanks for the info
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.
dates/build1/)
Interestingly, Redhat have recently released an update of their rebuild
of Firefox to ESR 52.5.1 ...
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this li
ecedence if you use policy
engine and one of the above existing tools ?
I guess it's no coincidence that the example JSON file file looks a lot
like the .cfg file created CCK2 :-) and the current listed Policies are
a subset of what CCK2 currently supports - is the plan to eventually
support al
rise_deployment.
> The “Enterprise Wiki” doesn’t appear to contain any info of immediate
> use to sysadmins.
Probably worth requesting this via https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ as a
new 'bug' - under 'Product: www.mozilla.org' and 'Component: Pages &
018/04/24/enterprise-policy-support-in-firefox/
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send
Martin Stransky wrote:
>>
>> However, I would also like to know how they plan to support FF60 in
>> el6 ...
>
> We're going to ship gtk3 (on some form) for Firefox60 on RHEL6. That
> does not mean gtk3 will be generally available on RHEL6 (AFAIK).
Thanks for
ESR cycle (FF59)."
However, I would also like to know how they plan to support FF60 in el6 ...
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please
eight) {
var uri = makeURI(aIconURL);
// Ignore bad URIs
if (!uri)
return;
LOG("_setIcon: Setting icon url \"" + limitURILength(uri.spec) +
"\" for engine \""
+ this.name + &q
the policies.json syntax:
"IconURL": "...YII=",
but I just get a generic icon for my Search Engine
The Policy Engine docs don't give any info on what the syntax should be
- except stating: "URL to icon" ...
Anyone know what the correct sy
OFILE_RESTART=1
then the firefox profile will be reset when you start firefox
However, you don't want to keep that setting - otherwise the profile
will be reset _each_ time you start firefox ...
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mo
nable it.
Have a look at:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Enterprise_deployment#Configuration
and:
https://mike.kaply.com/2012/03/16/customizing-firefox-autoconfig-files/
on how to set these preferences in an autoconfig file
James Pearson
___
t; (See
>> https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2015/10/08/npapi-plugins-in-firefox/)
>
> Yes, I can confirm that NPAPI support won't be available in Firefox ESR 60.
I'm guessing NPAPI support for Flash will still exist in ESR 60 - and
future versions of ESR unti
edhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/5/html/5.11_technical_notes/known_issues-firefox
Might not make it faster - but probably more stable :-)
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/list
mething to be supported by the forthcoming 'Policy Engine'
feature ?
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/
to 'on'
I guess you will also want to disable Private Browsing ? - if so, then
this can be done via CCK2 - which also removes the 'Never remember
history' menu item
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.o
I leave Oracle.
> My job is eliminated.
I don't use Solaris, so don't know if a ESR 52.6 build is available
elsewhere - but given ESR 52.0 has been built on Solaris, it should be
possible to build 52.6 from source using the same build set up (what
that is!)
James Pearson
to what you want by uncommenting the
following two lines in the userChrome.css file:
@import url(./css/tabs/tabs_below_titlebar_above_navigation_toolbar.css);
@import url(./css/toolbars/toolbar_mode_text.css);
James Pearson
___
Ente
ike.kaply.com/cck2/ and other posts at https://mike.kaply.com/
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/ent
James Pearson wrote:
>
> There was a thread on this list last month that mentioned a possible
> 'replacement' for Classic Theme Restorer see:
>
>https://mail.mozilla.org/private/enterprise/2018-January/008360.html
>
> That post stated:
>
>> Apparently, the wa
James Pearson wrote:
>>>
>>> While we’re making adjustments, the section on “How do I configure
>>> Firefox for my organization?” should definitely link to the actual
>>> community-supported answer to that question, namely
>>> https://developer.mo
"preferences": {
...
"plugin.disable_full_page_plugin_for_types": {
"value": "application/pdf"
},
...
},
Do you have something like this in your cck cfg file ?
James Pearson
___
En
d with ESR 60 (which is is due
in about 10 weeks time) - the Wiki page at
<https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/EnterprisePolicies> only lists
'possibilities' ...
Thanks
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mo
bugs here:
>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1428920
Thanks - using a search based on Component = 'Enterprise Policies', I get:
https://mzl.la/2Cg0VIj
Which sort of gives a list of all the policies ...
James Pearson
___
Enterpr
James Pearson wrote:
> Schuetz, Zach wrote:
>>
>> While we’re making adjustments, the section on “How do I configure
>> Firefox for my organization?” should definitely link to the actual
>> community-supported answer to that question, namely
>> https://de
file) will not work with 57 - so you will have to use an earlier Firefox
version (e.g. ESR 52) to generate a suitable cfg and cck2 files that
will work with 57
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.or
US/firefox/52.5.3/re=
leasenotes/
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email
>
to create the policies.json file instead of hand-crafting it ?
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
https://mail.mozilla.org/list
xisting profile,
> because with autoconfig.js it only worked on new profile) "StartPage" is
> not defined as search engine nor the default.
>
> Am I missing something? Or is something wrong, e.g. URLTemplate?
I believe the thing you are searching for is specified by
'
The wizard will not work with ESR 60
You will need to install the latest CCK2 with ESR 52 - but the autoconfig files
it creates can be used with ESR 60 (unzip what the wizard creates at the top
level of your ESR 60 install)
James Pearson
Sent from my iPhone
> On 6 Sep 2018, at 18:16, P
hat Autoconfig
will still exist - as I use it for more than just setting prefs and
using CCK2
Thanks
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, pleas
than just setting prefs and
>> using CCK2
>
> It will probably still exist, but it will be sandboxed back to the original
> API so it can be used as intended.
Not sure what you mean by 'sandboxed back to the original API' ... What
was the original API? - and does that mean there wi
erences in your autoconfig cfg file - see
https://mike.kaply.com/2012/02/21/understanding-add-on-scopes/
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, pleas
Mozilla dropped build support for gtk2 after v52
The gtk2 directory in builds after 52 are just to support the Flash plugin -
which is gtk2 only ...
James Pearson
Sent from my iPhone
> On 16 Apr 2018, at 17:25, Andrew C Aitchison <and...@aitchison.me.uk> wrote:
>
> the late
Redhat release of ESR 52 is built with '--disable-crashreporter'
The Linux builds of ESR 52 from Mozilla won't run on EL6 (as EL6 doesn't
support gtk3)
However, it should be fairly straightforward to rebuild the
Redhat/CentOS/SL Firefox SRPM on EL6 without then
'--disable-crashreporter' opti
would define 'only be controlled by a sysadmin' -
our NFS share path is not a 'standard' location that you would find on a
Linux install, but it is only writable by root ...
Thanks
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mai
Config file and possibly a Policy json file
for use with ESR 60+ ?
Unless, that is, you are planning a WebExtensions version of CCK2 ?
Thanks
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/ente
from Mozilla are self contained and run on EL7
(and easier to install CCK2 ...)
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
https://mail.mo
start with the 'Configuration' section at
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Enterprise_deployment
Or, have a look at CCK2 via https://mike.kaply.com/cck2/
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/li
ation.json file?
Or, will arbitrary preferences still have to be set via the autoconfig
cfg file?
Thanks
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, plea
Thanks
James Pearson
Dave Townsend wrote:
>
> Currently as long as SNAP_NAME is defined to something it will disable
> profiles-per-install, but there is an intention to replace that method of
> detecting snap packaged so I can't guarantee that that will exist long-term.
>
> On T
it's
> targeted at a different use case right now, so if important I'd like
> to use a different name for it) but it applies to any version and
> channel of Firefox.
What is the environment variable and what does it need to be set to for
disabling dedicated profiles ?
Thanks
James Pea
nced
the bug <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1528082>
I would also like to know how this is going to be handled in ESR 68 and
whether or not it can be disabled
We can not have users moving from ESR 60 to ESR 68, or between different
subsequent releases of ESR and have th
...
Is there any way to turn off these downloads - and use (single copies of)
centrally installed langpacks instead ?
I'm not aware of this happening with ESR 52 (and earlier)
Thanks
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
version)
With ESR 68 and above, will each of our separate installs require a separate
profile ? - or does 'installation' in this context mean Nightly, Beta, ESR, etc
?
Thanks
James Pearson
From: Enterprise [enterprise-boun...@mozilla.org] on behalf of Mike Kaply
appears to fix the problem
for us
I'll do some some more poking about to see if I can find out 'how' these
langpacks are being installed in user profile directories
James Pearson
From: Mike Kaply [mka...@mozilla.com]
Sent: 25 June 2019 20:25
To: James Pearson
Cc
We're just using the Mozilla provided tar archive - so there is no distribution
directory in that package ...
We're going to see if we can reproduce the issue and attempt to 'see' where
they are coming from
James Pearson
From: Mike Kaply [mka...@mozilla.com
of langpacks, so they had been previously copied to user profiles
from this install
Setting 'extensions.installDistroAddons' to 'false' doesn't actually
doing anything now as we are using the Mozilla build of ESR 60 (although
it would if were still using the Redhat/CentOS build)
Thanks
James Pearson
ver/search;>
Does anyone know how to translate the above into a suitable "PostData"
string for a policies.json file ?
Thanks
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.
Mike Kaply wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 8:45 AM James Pearson
>> wrote:
>> I have an existing search engine XML file that I would like to convert
>> to a Policy entry
>>
>> The search engine uses the 'POST' method, but I can't work out w
version generates are now
compatible with ESR 68
i.e. install the latest 'Wizard' on an older install of Firefox (e.g ESR
52) and use it to generate the autoconfig files to be installed with ESR 68
Or, even better, start using Policies instead ...
James Pearson
on release is about right
for us
I guess if you went to (say) a 6 monthly major version release, then you
would need to keep a 6 month overlap - with each major release supported
for a year - i.e. always have the latest and previous release supported
James Pearson
James Pearson wrote:
Mike Kaply wrote:
Share your thoughts on ESR Release Cadence
We would love your feedback in our current cadence of Firefox
Extended Support releases.
Today, an ESR life cycle spans between 9 months to a year. We would
like to understand if a shorter life cycle
e
> actively looking at Flatpak
I assume you will also keep the current bzip'd tar archives ?
Thanks
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, plea
Yes - although to make life easier, use the Enterprise Policy Generator
from:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/enterprise-policy-generator/
James Pearson
Paul Kosinski via Enterprise wrote:
So the JSON file can be used on Linux to do this?
On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:23:23 -0500
communicating to all enterprise users how to revert their profile
after?
If you set the variable MOZ_LEGACY_PROFILES in the environment (it can
be set to anything), then this will allow users to use their existing
profile
James Pearson
___
Enterprise
extensions to be sideloaded ???
Thanks
James Pearson
P.S. I'm still a bit confused about 'sideloading' - as the Blog post
says the change will be with Firefox 73/74 - but I can't seem to enable
'sideloading' with ESR 68 - i.e. want to be able to load named
extensions from a central location without
Is it likely that Mozilla will re-think this change as far as ESR is
concerned?
i.e. allow 'sideloading' of extensions in all future releases of ESR -
potentially controlled via a Policy ?
Thanks
James Pearson
Mike Kaply wrote:
You can deploy extensions as a part of Firefox by putting
to work with all future major ESR
releases ...
Thanks
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
The very latest Flash plugin doesn’t run on CentOS 7 (needs a newer libgcc than
provided by the OS) - which might be your problem?
Previous versions work with ESR 68 on CentOS 7
James Pearson
Sent from my iPhone
> On 6 Dec 2019, at 22:57, Stephen Carville (Mozilla List) via Enterpr
6b3d4840cc01a8f1a8ec/README.md#searchengines--default
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
or se
pdfjs.disabled is set to false
Thanks
James Pearson
Mike Kaply wrote:
That's quite strange.
Are you sure you're not somehow accidentally turning it off?
What do you see for the value of pdfjs.disabled when you go to about:config?
Mike
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:25 AM James Pearson
tom protocol handler on the first run of Firefox
appears to interfere with/break the built-it PDF viewer
This is with Firefox ESR 68.1 on Linux
Any idea what I can do to prevent this happening ?
Thanks
James Pearson
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mo
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
