Re: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?

2015-09-28 Thread EVDL Administrator via EV
On 28 Sep 2015 at 21:30, Lawrence Rhodes via EV wrote:

> Our budget ev's fail because they are too heavy.

I wasn't going to write anthing more about this subject, but I have to 
respond to this.  

YOU may consider YOUR budget EVs to be failures, and that's entirely your 
right.  Maybe they don't meet your needs.  I have no idea.

But I sure hope you're using the "royal our" there, because you don't get to 
make that judgement about other people's EVs.  Thousands of people all over 
the world have built short- to medium-range conversion and original EVs that 
suit their needs just fine, thank you very much, regardless of what you 
think of them.  

I'll just add that some folks on this discussion list might indeed buy 
hyperefficient EVs.  Maybe I would.  I initially thought the Aptera was a 
really interesting idea.  However, we're talking a percentage of about 600 
people, which is not exactly survival territory for most automakers.

Hyperefficient and/or onboard PV EVs are a tiny niche of an already small 
niche.  And EVs are still a niche product.  We think that Nissan selling 
30,200 Leaves last year was a huge success, and it was, but in the same year 
Chevrolet sold 34,839 Corvettes, and even GM will tell you that the 'Vette 
is a niche vehicle.  

So if you want something like Stella, you're probably going to have to build 
it yourself.  If you don't want to duplicate Stella, maybe you could find a 
copy of the plans for Bob McKee's Sundancer and update the design.  It 
managed between 95 and 135 Wh/mi (depending on speed) in 1973.  That was 
with lead batteries, a DC motor, and a belt drive.  Just imagine what it 
could do with 2015 engineering!  Curiously, its dimensions were quite close 
to Stella's (124" long, 40" high, 62" wide).  And, IMO, it was a much more 
handsome car than Stella.

David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA
EVDL Administrator

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
EVDL Information: http://www.evdl.org/help/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 
Note: mail sent to "evpost" and "etpost" addresses will not 
reach me.  To send a private message, please obtain my 
email address from the webpage http://www.evdl.org/help/ .
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?

2015-09-28 Thread John Lussmyer via EV
On Mon Sep 28 21:12:35 PDT 2015 ev@lists.evdl.org said:
>I thought that both would be well recieved. Alas the VLC still sits waiting
>for traction. No one seems interested in it. I wondered why? 

Does it have Stereo, Air Conditioning, windows that open, comfy seats, 
reasonable acceleration?
Without those at a bare minimum, won't sell.


--

Try my Sensible Email package!  https://sourceforge.net/projects/sensibleemail/
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?

2015-09-28 Thread Ben Goren via EV
On Sep 28, 2015, at 9:12 PM, rayfellow via EV  wrote:

> The difference in per mile costs for an efficient EV vs a
> heavy user is still not all that much.

This is a _very_ significant part of the equation.

My parents recently bought a Leaf. They love it, can't stop talking about it. 
And they literally can't tell the difference in their electric bills since they 
bought it.

In computer programming, it's known as premature optimization. If you have a 
choice of writing code that's quick and easy for the programmer to write and 
later update and maintain, but runs 1000 times slower than some sophisticated 
but difficult-to-understand alternative, which do you write? First, you write 
the quick-and-easy code. And you don't ever look at it again until and unless 
performance is a problem. Even if the easy way is 1000 times slower...if it 
takes ten seconds to execute rather than 0.01 seconds...well, if it's something 
that a single person executes once every four months, why spend hours of 
expensive programmer time saving a low-paid end user half a minute spread out 
over the course of a year? If it's part of the inner event loop of an 
high-performance video game, sure; you squeeze every last CPU cycle out of it. 
But, within rounding, that represents 0% of the computer code written on a 
daily basis.

So it is with electric vehicles. You've got one vehicle that gets ten miles per 
kWh, another that gets "only" three miles per kWh. The one is three times as 
expensive to charge up, so somebody's got to notice, right? Not when the 
difference in cost to drive 30 miles for your commute is 30 miles / (10 - 3 
miles / kWh) * 10¢ / kWh = 43¢ -- not even enough to buy a stamp these days!

Now, consider that a significant fraction of EV owners have rooftop solar, and 
thus their ongoing marginal cost per kWh is literally zero...and why should 
such people even pretend to care about efficiency?

On the list of things that matter in an electric vehicle, efficiency isn't even 
on the list. Indirectly, perhaps, in terms of range and the cost of the battery 
to support the desired range...but make an affordable EV with a 400 mile range 
and efficiency even as bad as an entire kWh / mile, and you won't be able to 
make them fast enough to meet demand.

Cheers,

b&
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150928/27ef2d7e/attachment.pgp>
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?

2015-09-28 Thread Mike Nickerson via EV
Personally, I think there are two factors.

First, performance.  A Tesla is a thrill at every stop light (especially if you 
are first in line).

Second, commercialization and availability.  Elon Musk had the drive and push 
to get his car built and available around the world.  Three years ago, Tesla 
was giving test drives and selling cars in Boise, ID.  People in Boise have 
never heard of a VLC; much less seen or driven one.

Add in the Tesla SuperCharger network, and it is game over.

I think people want to be environmentally conscious, but fun sells cars.  A fun 
car that is efficient enough will win against a more efficient car that isn't 
as fun.

Mike


On September 28, 2015 10:12:35 PM MDT, rayfellow via EV  
wrote:
>In 2012 I was helping Oliver Kuttner promote his VLC or Very Light Car.
>It
>was very aerodynamic too (0.16 drag). His team won the X prize in 2008
>-
>getting 108 or so MPG with fuel. The car he had in California was
>electric.
>It had a 10KWh battery and would go 100 miles between charges - It
>weighed
>under 1,000 pounds. I rode in the car some 50 miles or so, and was
>impressed
>with the ride, comfort etc. It carried 4 passengers. 
>
>About this time Tesla came out with their car - Big battery and heavy.
>I
>thought that the VLC would be as popular as the Tesla.. Boy was I
>wrong! No
>one seemed impressed that the VLC would go a mile on 100wh vs the 300wh
>for
>the Tesla.
>
>I thought that both would be well recieved. Alas the VLC still sits
>waiting
>for traction. No one seems interested in it. I wondered why? The only
>answer
>I can come up with is the cost of electricity is relitively cheap
>compared
>to liquid fuel. The difference in per mile costs for an efficient EV vs
>a
>heavy user is still not all that much.
>
>I have pondered this. Maybe there are other reasons too - but
>seriously,
>none of the current EV's comes close to Aptera or VLC in efficency..
>and yet
>no one wants them.
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/EVLN-The-Big-EV-Debate-Go-for-Small-or-Big-Battery-Pack-tp4677803p4677812.html
>Sent from the Electric Vehicle Discussion List mailing list archive at
>Nabble.com.
>___
>UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
>Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA
>(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?

2015-09-28 Thread rayfellow via EV
In 2012 I was helping Oliver Kuttner promote his VLC or Very Light Car. It
was very aerodynamic too (0.16 drag). His team won the X prize in 2008 -
getting 108 or so MPG with fuel. The car he had in California was electric.
It had a 10KWh battery and would go 100 miles between charges - It weighed
under 1,000 pounds. I rode in the car some 50 miles or so, and was impressed
with the ride, comfort etc. It carried 4 passengers. 

About this time Tesla came out with their car - Big battery and heavy. I
thought that the VLC would be as popular as the Tesla.. Boy was I wrong! No
one seemed impressed that the VLC would go a mile on 100wh vs the 300wh for
the Tesla.

I thought that both would be well recieved. Alas the VLC still sits waiting
for traction. No one seems interested in it. I wondered why? The only answer
I can come up with is the cost of electricity is relitively cheap compared
to liquid fuel. The difference in per mile costs for an efficient EV vs a
heavy user is still not all that much.

I have pondered this. Maybe there are other reasons too - but seriously,
none of the current EV's comes close to Aptera or VLC in efficency.. and yet
no one wants them.

--
View this message in context: 
http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/EVLN-The-Big-EV-Debate-Go-for-Small-or-Big-Battery-Pack-tp4677803p4677812.html
Sent from the Electric Vehicle Discussion List mailing list archive at 
Nabble.com.
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?

2015-09-28 Thread Peri Hartman via EV
The Leaf is a great car overall but for stop & go city driving, the 
regen often cuts out when braking and switches to mechanical - sometimes 
I can feel the switchover.  Even if there was no regen, an earlier 
thread on this forum illustrated that regen probably only adds about 5% 
to the miles / kWh.  Maybe 10% if you're really special :)


Regardless, it's very apparent that cruising at 40mph gives excellent 
miles / kWH -- somewhere around 5+ and even at 60mph up to 4.  I never 
get that on city blocks where I'm stopping and starting and going up and 
down steep hills.  I always drive in "B" (stronger regen) mode, not "D" 
mode.


By the way, minor point: it doesn't take a small vehicle to have a low 
Cd.  The Boeing 747 has a Cd = .031.  That's .031, not .31 :)


Peri


-- Original Message --
From: "Mike Nickerson" 
To: "Peri Hartman" ; "Electric Vehicle Discussion 
List" 

Sent: 28-Sep-15 5:13:08 PM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery 
Pack?


I think it is key to remember, though, that a Cd of 0.16 is deep into 
concept car territory.  Most small cars are 0.28-0.32.  The Toyota 
Prius is 0.25.  The Tesla Model S is 0.24.  There isn't much under 0.24 
that isn't concept or experimental (except the EV1 at 0.195).


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automobile_drag_coefficient

I'm surprised the Leaf doesn't do better in the city.  Does it brake 
aggressively enough with regeneration so you don't need the friction 
brakes much?  I have to drive the Tesla very aggressively to get less 
than 3 miles per kWh.  On a bad day, I get around 300 Wh per mile.  On 
a careful day, I can get around 230-250 Wh per mile.  However, due to 
aggressive regeneration, it gets almost everything back into the 
battery.  I hardly use the friction brakes.


Mike


On September 28, 2015 2:39:45 PM MDT, Peri Hartman via EV 
 wrote:

I think the key factor is the Cd of .16.   While I think lighter
vehicles are better for many reasons, it doesn't seem to make that 
much


difference in efficiency unless you are spending most of your time on
slow speed city streets.

For example, my Leaf gets about 1.5 - 2.5 miles per kWh (depending on
accessories and temperature) on city streets where I live.  But if I 
go


60mph on the freeway, I can sometimes get 4 miles per kWh.

Peri

-- Original Message --
From: "Lawrence Rhodes via EV" 
To: "ev@lists.evdl.org" ;
"ev-requ...@lists.evdl.org"

Sent: 28-Sep-15 1:31:45 PM
Subject: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery
Pack?


The debate should be about  light or heavy vehicles and efficiency.

If

you have an efficient vehicle that is light you might draw 55wh per
mile.  The typical heavy conversion like the I3 , Leaf, Rav4, IMEV, 
or



any other of the currently available EV's are just too heavy to give
good range with a small pack.  They all draw 200 or more wh per mile.



The I3 is going in the right direction.  It has a relatively small

pack

and is more efficient than all the other competitors.If however

you
have a light vehicle around a thousand pounds your range will be 
close


to 350 miles with a 16kw battery pack.  The vehicle needs to have a 
CD



of about .16.  With these specifications you don't have to have a big
pack.  It will charge in 2.5 hours with a 6.6kw charger.  Efficiency
and charging time should be the goal.  Smaller the pack the quicker

the

charge.  Also the packs will last longer as they are not stressed as
much by carrying large weights.  Engineering the right combination is
what is needed.  Not 85kw packs in 5000 pound cars...however they are
very comfortable and useful as is and better than the ICE 
alternative.



Lawrence Rhodes
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150928/dcb4a2f9/attachment.htm>
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)





___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?

2015-09-28 Thread Peter Eckhoff via EV
ed.
You might not need more than 20kW to move one econobox but see how Model S
P85D puts the EV's on the map. Our budget conversions could not do that. We
need to admit that. Sorry.
What makes all the difference for the business is how much does the
battery cost. We will see less than $100/kWh before 2020. Or at least it is
possible but if demand is high it sets the price level. On the other hand
Tesla may provide Model 3 as a service and they will own the cars always.
Then it does not matter how much the cells cost. You just pay that 10c/mi
and nothing else. So it does not matter if it weights 2, 3 or 5 tons. Even
less if the car drives itself.  :)
-Jukka
http://www.google.com/profiles/jarviju#about
2015-09-28 23:39 GMT+03:00 Peri Hartman via EV :

I think the key factor is the Cd of .16.   While I think lighter vehicles
are better for many reasons, it doesn't seem to make that much difference
in efficiency unless you are spending most of your time on slow speed city
streets.

For example, my Leaf gets about 1.5 - 2.5 miles per kWh (depending on
accessories and temperature) on city streets where I live.  But if I go
60mph on the freeway, I can sometimes get 4 miles per kWh.

Peri

-- Original Message --
From: "Lawrence Rhodes via EV" 
To: "ev@lists.evdl.org" ; "ev-requ...@lists.evdl.org" <
ev-requ...@lists.evdl.org>
Sent: 28-Sep-15 1:31:45 PM
Subject: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?


The debate should be about  light or heavy vehicles and efficiency.  If
you have an efficient vehicle that is light you might draw 55wh per mile.
The typical heavy conversion like the I3 , Leaf, Rav4, IMEV, or any other
of the currently available EV's are just too heavy to give good range with
a small pack.  They all draw 200 or more wh per mile.  The I3 is going in
the right direction.  It has a relatively small pack and is more efficient
than all the other competitors.If however you have a light vehicle
around a thousand pounds your range will be close to 350 miles with a 16kw
battery pack.  The vehicle needs to have a CD of about .16.  With these
specifications you don't have to have a big pack.  It will charge in 2.5
hours with a 6.6kw charger.  Efficiency and charging time should be the
goal.  Smaller the pack the quicker the charge.  Also the packs will last
longer as they are not stressed as much by carrying large weights.
Engineering the right combination is what is needed.  Not 85kw packs in
5000 pound cars...however they are very comfortable and useful as is and
better than the ICE alternative.  Lawrence Rhodes
------ next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150928/dcb4a2f9/attachment.htm
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)





___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)




___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?

2015-09-28 Thread Mike Nickerson via EV
I think it is key to remember, though, that a Cd of 0.16 is deep into concept 
car territory.  Most small cars are 0.28-0.32.  The Toyota Prius is 0.25.  The 
Tesla Model S is 0.24.  There isn't much under 0.24 that isn't concept or 
experimental (except the EV1 at 0.195).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automobile_drag_coefficient

I'm surprised the Leaf doesn't do better in the city.  Does it brake 
aggressively enough with regeneration so you don't need the friction brakes 
much?  I have to drive the Tesla very aggressively to get less than 3 miles per 
kWh.  On a bad day, I get around 300 Wh per mile.  On a careful day, I can get 
around 230-250 Wh per mile.  However, due to aggressive regeneration, it gets 
almost everything back into the battery.  I hardly use the friction brakes.

Mike


On September 28, 2015 2:39:45 PM MDT, Peri Hartman via EV  
wrote:
>I think the key factor is the Cd of .16.   While I think lighter 
>vehicles are better for many reasons, it doesn't seem to make that much
>
>difference in efficiency unless you are spending most of your time on 
>slow speed city streets.
>
>For example, my Leaf gets about 1.5 - 2.5 miles per kWh (depending on 
>accessories and temperature) on city streets where I live.  But if I go
>
>60mph on the freeway, I can sometimes get 4 miles per kWh.
>
>Peri
>
>-- Original Message --
>From: "Lawrence Rhodes via EV" 
>To: "ev@lists.evdl.org" ;
>"ev-requ...@lists.evdl.org" 
>
>Sent: 28-Sep-15 1:31:45 PM
>Subject: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery 
>Pack?
>
>>The debate should be about  light or heavy vehicles and efficiency. 
>If 
>>you have an efficient vehicle that is light you might draw 55wh per 
>>mile.  The typical heavy conversion like the I3 , Leaf, Rav4, IMEV, or
>
>>any other of the currently available EV's are just too heavy to give 
>>good range with a small pack.  They all draw 200 or more wh per mile. 
>
>>The I3 is going in the right direction.  It has a relatively small
>pack 
>>and is more efficient than all the other competitors.If however
>you 
>>have a light vehicle around a thousand pounds your range will be close
>
>>to 350 miles with a 16kw battery pack.  The vehicle needs to have a CD
>
>>of about .16.  With these specifications you don't have to have a big 
>>pack.  It will charge in 2.5 hours with a 6.6kw charger.  Efficiency 
>>and charging time should be the goal.  Smaller the pack the quicker
>the 
>>charge.  Also the packs will last longer as they are not stressed as 
>>much by carrying large weights.  Engineering the right combination is 
>>what is needed.  Not 85kw packs in 5000 pound cars...however they are 
>>very comfortable and useful as is and better than the ICE alternative.
> 
>>Lawrence Rhodes
>>-- next part --
>>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>URL: 
>><http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150928/dcb4a2f9/attachment.htm>
>>___
>>UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>>http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>>Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
>>Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA 
>>(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>>
>
>___
>UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
>Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA
>(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?

2015-09-28 Thread Jukka Järvinen via EV
les and efficiency.  If
> you have an efficient vehicle that is light you might draw 55wh per mile.
> The typical heavy conversion like the I3 , Leaf, Rav4, IMEV, or any other
> of the currently available EV's are just too heavy to give good range with
> a small pack.  They all draw 200 or more wh per mile.  The I3 is going in
> the right direction.  It has a relatively small pack and is more efficient
> than all the other competitors.If however you have a light vehicle
> around a thousand pounds your range will be close to 350 miles with a 16kw
> battery pack.  The vehicle needs to have a CD of about .16.  With these
> specifications you don't have to have a big pack.  It will charge in 2.5
> hours with a 6.6kw charger.  Efficiency and charging time should be the
> goal.  Smaller the pack the quicker the charge.  Also the packs will last
> longer as they are not stressed as much by carrying large weights.
> Engineering the right combination is what is needed.  Not 85kw packs in
> 5000 pound cars...however they are very comfortable and useful as is and
> better than the ICE alternative.  Lawrence Rhodes
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150928/dcb4a2f9/attachment.htm
> >
> ___
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
> Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
> Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150928/c2016efb/attachment.htm
> >
> ___
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
> Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150929/ec578189/attachment.htm>
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?

2015-09-28 Thread EVDL Administrator via EV
On 28 Sep 2015 at 20:31, Lawrence Rhodes via EV wrote:

> The debate should be about  light or heavy vehicles and efficiency.  If you
> have an efficient vehicle that is light you might draw 55wh per mile.  The
> typical heavy conversion like the I3 , Leaf, Rav4, IMEV, or any other of the
> currently available EV's are just too heavy to give good range with a small
> pack.

I may have missed something here, but I don't see what debate you're talking 
about.  Nobody is going to argue that a light, efficient vehicle isn't a 
route to getting decent range out of a small, cheap battery.

The problem is selling the EV.  In the real world of real customers buying 
real cars in real first-world nations, there's a limit on lightening 
vehicles, at least if you're staying in the 4-wheel class.  You're 
constrained not just by customer expectations - safety, comfort, cupholders -
 but also by vehicle safety regulations.  You can evade them with a 3-
wheeler, but we've seen where that goes.

The market for ultralight (non-bike) EVs is small, though probably not 
nonexistent.  But because sales are and will be low, economy of scale is 
limited.  That in turn means minimally-equipped vehicles and/or high prices. 
Both of these further crimp the market size.  You're just not going to get 
very many people to give up their Corollas and RAV4s unless you match or 
exceed their current rides for comfort and safety.

I think the key to modest sales success with ultralight EVs is to follow the 
example set by Renault with the Twizy.  They emphasize its quirkiness. They 
get race car drivers to have fun with it and shoot video of them.  They're 
not really trying to sell it so much as practical transportation, but more 
as entertainment.  They seem to be having modest success with that.

David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA
EVDL Administrator

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
EVDL Information: http://www.evdl.org/help/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 
Note: mail sent to "evpost" and "etpost" addresses will not 
reach me.  To send a private message, please obtain my 
email address from the webpage http://www.evdl.org/help/ .
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?

2015-09-28 Thread Lawrence Rhodes via EV
Our budget ev's fail because they are too heavy.  If you converted or built a 
small light vehicle using a kit as are available you will find that you will 
gain in every area with a small pack and light vehicle.  Look at Stella Lux.  
Pushing a 700 mile range with 15kw pack.   Look at what the Tesla could do with 
a light vehicle.  Because of the 85 to 90kw pack the car must be much heavier 
to carry the weight.  Carrying more weight hurts range so it is a vicious cycle 
of over engineering.  375 miles on 16kw or 300 miles on 85kw.  I will take the 
lighter alternative...add solar and you never need plugging in as solar makes 
sense on light vehiclesnot heavy ones like we convert.  Lawrence Rhodes
  From: Jukka Järvinen 
 To: Peri Hartman ; Electric Vehicle Discussion List 
 
Cc: Lawrence Rhodes ; "ev-requ...@lists.evdl.org" 
 
 Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 2:00 PM
 Subject: Re: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?
   
I think it's more important to think how the user benefits from the battery 
sizing. 
While it might sound irrational to have 150kWh onboard it would enable 
stressless driving with longer useful lifetime. The vehicle it self will have 
better resale value as it remains more usable even after 10 or 15 years. Also 
people need to charge their cars only as much as they use. It has nothing to do 
with the battery size. 
But... 1C charging with 20kWh pack is 333Wh/minute. 1C charging for 150kWh pack 
is 2.500Wh/minute. If it takes 250Wh/km (400Wh/mi) you either gain 
0,83mi/minute or 6,25mi/minute. A DC-dumping with 300kW will stress less the 
larger pack as it has more mass to absorb the losses and there's less 
temperature rise during use. Also the discharge side has to be considered. You 
might not need more than 20kW to move one econobox but see how Model S P85D 
puts the EV's on the map. Our budget conversions could not do that. We need to 
admit that. Sorry.
What makes all the difference for the business is how much does the battery 
cost. We will see less than $100/kWh before 2020. Or at least it is possible 
but if demand is high it sets the price level. On the other hand Tesla may 
provide Model 3 as a service and they will own the cars always. Then it does 
not matter how much the cells cost. You just pay that 10c/mi and nothing else. 
So it does not matter if it weights 2, 3 or 5 tons. Even less if the car drives 
itself.  :)
-Jukka 
http://www.google.com/profiles/jarviju#about
2015-09-28 23:39 GMT+03:00 Peri Hartman via EV :

I think the key factor is the Cd of .16.   While I think lighter vehicles are 
better for many reasons, it doesn't seem to make that much difference in 
efficiency unless you are spending most of your time on slow speed city streets.

For example, my Leaf gets about 1.5 - 2.5 miles per kWh (depending on 
accessories and temperature) on city streets where I live.  But if I go 60mph 
on the freeway, I can sometimes get 4 miles per kWh.

Peri

-- Original Message --
From: "Lawrence Rhodes via EV" 
To: "ev@lists.evdl.org" ; "ev-requ...@lists.evdl.org" 

Sent: 28-Sep-15 1:31:45 PM
Subject: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?


The debate should be about  light or heavy vehicles and efficiency.  If you 
have an efficient vehicle that is light you might draw 55wh per mile.  The 
typical heavy conversion like the I3 , Leaf, Rav4, IMEV, or any other of the 
currently available EV's are just too heavy to give good range with a small 
pack.  They all draw 200 or more wh per mile.  The I3 is going in the right 
direction.  It has a relatively small pack and is more efficient than all the 
other competitors.    If however you have a light vehicle around a thousand 
pounds your range will be close to 350 miles with a 16kw battery pack.  The 
vehicle needs to have a CD of about .16.  With these specifications you don't 
have to have a big pack.  It will charge in 2.5 hours with a 6.6kw charger.  
Efficiency and charging time should be the goal.  Smaller the pack the quicker 
the charge.  Also the packs will last longer as they are not stressed as much 
by carrying large weights.  Engineering the right combination is what is 
needed.  Not 85kw packs in 5000 pound cars...however they are very comfortable 
and useful as is and better than the ICE alternative.  Lawrence Rhodes
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150928/dcb4a2f9/attachment.htm>
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)





___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/i

Re: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?

2015-09-28 Thread Jukka Järvinen via EV
I think it's more important to think how the user benefits from the battery
sizing.

While it might sound irrational to have 150kWh onboard it would enable
stressless driving with longer useful lifetime. The vehicle it self will
have better resale value as it remains more usable even after 10 or 15
years. Also people need to charge their cars only as much as they use. It
has nothing to do with the battery size.

But... 1C charging with 20kWh pack is 333Wh/minute. 1C charging for 150kWh
pack is 2.500Wh/minute. If it takes 250Wh/km (400Wh/mi) you either gain
0,83mi/minute or 6,25mi/minute. A DC-dumping with 300kW will stress less
the larger pack as it has more mass to absorb the losses and there's less
temperature rise during use. Also the discharge side has to be considered.
You might not need more than 20kW to move one econobox but see how Model S
P85D puts the EV's on the map. Our budget conversions could not do that. We
need to admit that. Sorry.

What makes all the difference for the business is how much does the battery
cost. We will see less than $100/kWh before 2020. Or at least it is
possible but if demand is high it sets the price level. On the other hand
Tesla may provide Model 3 as a service and they will own the cars always.
Then it does not matter how much the cells cost. You just pay that 10c/mi
and nothing else. So it does not matter if it weights 2, 3 or 5 tons. Even
less if the car drives itself.  :)

-Jukka

http://www.google.com/profiles/jarviju#about

2015-09-28 23:39 GMT+03:00 Peri Hartman via EV :

> I think the key factor is the Cd of .16.   While I think lighter vehicles
> are better for many reasons, it doesn't seem to make that much difference
> in efficiency unless you are spending most of your time on slow speed city
> streets.
>
> For example, my Leaf gets about 1.5 - 2.5 miles per kWh (depending on
> accessories and temperature) on city streets where I live.  But if I go
> 60mph on the freeway, I can sometimes get 4 miles per kWh.
>
> Peri
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Lawrence Rhodes via EV" 
> To: "ev@lists.evdl.org" ; "ev-requ...@lists.evdl.org" <
> ev-requ...@lists.evdl.org>
> Sent: 28-Sep-15 1:31:45 PM
> Subject: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?
>
> The debate should be about  light or heavy vehicles and efficiency.  If
>> you have an efficient vehicle that is light you might draw 55wh per mile.
>> The typical heavy conversion like the I3 , Leaf, Rav4, IMEV, or any other
>> of the currently available EV's are just too heavy to give good range with
>> a small pack.  They all draw 200 or more wh per mile.  The I3 is going in
>> the right direction.  It has a relatively small pack and is more efficient
>> than all the other competitors.If however you have a light vehicle
>> around a thousand pounds your range will be close to 350 miles with a 16kw
>> battery pack.  The vehicle needs to have a CD of about .16.  With these
>> specifications you don't have to have a big pack.  It will charge in 2.5
>> hours with a 6.6kw charger.  Efficiency and charging time should be the
>> goal.  Smaller the pack the quicker the charge.  Also the packs will last
>> longer as they are not stressed as much by carrying large weights.
>> Engineering the right combination is what is needed.  Not 85kw packs in
>> 5000 pound cars...however they are very comfortable and useful as is and
>> better than the ICE alternative.  Lawrence Rhodes
>> -- next part --
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150928/dcb4a2f9/attachment.htm
>> >
>> ___
>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>> Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
>> Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>>
>>
> ___
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
> Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150929/a3ec98fb/attachment.htm>
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?

2015-09-28 Thread Peri Hartman via EV
I think the key factor is the Cd of .16.   While I think lighter 
vehicles are better for many reasons, it doesn't seem to make that much 
difference in efficiency unless you are spending most of your time on 
slow speed city streets.


For example, my Leaf gets about 1.5 - 2.5 miles per kWh (depending on 
accessories and temperature) on city streets where I live.  But if I go 
60mph on the freeway, I can sometimes get 4 miles per kWh.


Peri

-- Original Message --
From: "Lawrence Rhodes via EV" 
To: "ev@lists.evdl.org" ; "ev-requ...@lists.evdl.org" 


Sent: 28-Sep-15 1:31:45 PM
Subject: [EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery 
Pack?


The debate should be about  light or heavy vehicles and efficiency.  If 
you have an efficient vehicle that is light you might draw 55wh per 
mile.  The typical heavy conversion like the I3 , Leaf, Rav4, IMEV, or 
any other of the currently available EV's are just too heavy to give 
good range with a small pack.  They all draw 200 or more wh per mile.  
The I3 is going in the right direction.  It has a relatively small pack 
and is more efficient than all the other competitors.If however you 
have a light vehicle around a thousand pounds your range will be close 
to 350 miles with a 16kw battery pack.  The vehicle needs to have a CD 
of about .16.  With these specifications you don't have to have a big 
pack.  It will charge in 2.5 hours with a 6.6kw charger.  Efficiency 
and charging time should be the goal.  Smaller the pack the quicker the 
charge.  Also the packs will last longer as they are not stressed as 
much by carrying large weights.  Engineering the right combination is 
what is needed.  Not 85kw packs in 5000 pound cars...however they are 
very comfortable and useful as is and better than the ICE alternative.  
Lawrence Rhodes

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150928/dcb4a2f9/attachment.htm>

___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)




___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



[EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?

2015-09-28 Thread Lawrence Rhodes via EV
The debate should be about  light or heavy vehicles and efficiency.  If you 
have an efficient vehicle that is light you might draw 55wh per mile.  The 
typical heavy conversion like the I3 , Leaf, Rav4, IMEV, or any other of the 
currently available EV's are just too heavy to give good range with a small 
pack.  They all draw 200 or more wh per mile.  The I3 is going in the right 
direction.  It has a relatively small pack and is more efficient than all the 
other competitors.    If however you have a light vehicle around a thousand 
pounds your range will be close to 350 miles with a 16kw battery pack.  The 
vehicle needs to have a CD of about .16.  With these specifications you don't 
have to have a big pack.  It will charge in 2.5 hours with a 6.6kw charger.  
Efficiency and charging time should be the goal.  Smaller the pack the quicker 
the charge.  Also the packs will last longer as they are not stressed as much 
by carrying large weights.  Engineering the right combination is what is 
needed.  Not 85kw packs in 5000 pound cars...however they are very comfortable 
and useful as is and better than the ICE alternative.  Lawrence Rhodes
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150928/dcb4a2f9/attachment.htm>
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



[EVDL] Seattle-WA Amazon Electric-bi&tri-delivery-cycles> steep-expectations

2015-09-28 Thread brucedp5 via EV


'$5k Krause' custom wooden electric-cycle admired ts:35mph'
'KasetsartU.th e-tricycle Eco-taxi-service for getting around campus'

http://www.geekwire.com/2015/life-as-an-amazon-bicycle-courier-steep-hills-and-even-steeper-expectations/
Life as an Amazon bicycle courier: Steep hills and even steeper expectations
by Jacob Demmitt  September 24, 2015

[images
http://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/IMAG11911-1-e1443117724306.jpeg
An Amazon delivery rider. (Photo courtesy IndyStealth)

http://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Bikes-620x465.jpg
These custom AmazonFresh delivery bikes were used by IndyStealth to deliver
groceries for the company. (Photo courtesy IndyStealth)
]

[image] An Amazon bicycle courier on the streets of Seattle. (GeekWire
Photo, Jacob Demmitt)

Amazon has a growing list of seemingly magical new delivery services,
promising to bring household items, high-tech gadgets and even dinner to
your door in less than an hour. Customers don’t see all the
behind-the-scenes logistics required to make these deliveries happen, but
people involved in the process say the reason it seems so impossibly great
is that it is, in fact, almost impossible. 

Especially for the company’s fleet of bicycle couriers.

Amazon has been in the spotlight recently for its unapologetically high
standards for its workforce — standards that apply to everyone from software
engineers in Seattle to warehouse workers across the country. So it
shouldn’t come as a surprise that those same expectations extend to the
$15-per-hour bicycle couriers that the company uses to make deliveries for
its Prime Now and AmazonFresh services.

But for some of the couriers who have gone to work for the e-commerce giant,
it has been a rude awakening.

GeekWire has spoken with four current and past riders, as well as their
managers and veterans of the courier industry. Many more riders declined to
comment, but those who did talk said they’ve never experienced anything
quite like Amazon. Orders are heavier than normal loads, and they require
quicker delivery times and near-perfect execution, say the experienced
couriers, some of whom did not want their names used because they still
deliver packages for the company.

Everything is computerized. Everything is tracked. Everything is analyzed
for absolute efficiency. And whenever something goes wrong, there always has
to be an explanation.

Riders are assigned a numeric score that Amazon calls the “Perfect Delivery
Rate,” or PDR, describing how well they meet expectations — similar to the
systems the company uses to track warehouse workers. Show up at a delivery
destination a little too early or late, and you’re going to get docked.

Matt Fay, a Seattle rider who said he was fired after an argument with
Amazon managers over what he called unfair allocation of tips, has been a
courier for 16 years. He said the company’s standards for that ideal
delivery are simply “physically impossible.” There are a lot of unknowns in
the courier business — like rain and unmanned front desks inside buildings.
Amazon’s system doesn’t account for any of that, Fay said.

A rider for another courier contractor, who spoke on the condition of
anonymity since he still delivers for Amazon, said some of the fastest
couriers he knows have the lowest PDR scores, simply because they take the
more challenging loads.

He says a big part of the problem is that Amazon is bulldozing its way into
courier services, but it doesn’t understand the industry it’s trying to
disrupt or the quirks of the cities it’s expanding into.

“Everywhere they’re losing money and everywhere they’re trying to cut costs
by cutting staff,” he said. “Basically, they’re making the entire day a
stress situation and then going back to management and asking why the
Perfect Delivery Rate isn’t higher.”

[image] AmazonFresh workers load a cart for delivery in Seattle. (GeekWire
Photo, Jacob Demmitt.)

Daniel Velazquez, another Seattle rider who lost his job when Amazon
switched contractors, said he used to work the 3 a.m. until noon shift for
AmazonFresh.

He remembers one morning when the truck with all his 6 a.m. deliveries
didn’t show up until 5:20 a.m. Not only did that leave him just 40 minutes
to finish everything, but he had received 12 orders that day. Usually, he’s
supposed to get eight for a two-hour window.

“I had to do my best and then find out later they were asking why things
were late,” Velazquez said.

Some of the issues are just inherent to taking a job as a bike messenger.
It’s always going to be challenging work, requiring couriers to rush around
town. But problems arise when you combine those jobs with Amazon’s signature
brand of perfection.

An Amazon spokesman offered this comment when GeekWire reached out for this
story: “With everything we do, safety is our number one priority.
AmazonFresh and Prime Now bike messengers do a fantastic job for our
customers and our customers love the service. The bike messengers typica

[EVDL] EVLN: The Big EV Debate> Go for Small or Big Battery Pack?

2015-09-28 Thread brucedp5 via EV


http://www.torquenews.com/3618/big-electric-car-debate
The Big Electric Car Debate: Small Battery or Big Battery
By Douglas Stansfield  2015-09-21

[image  
http://www.torquenews.com/sites/default/files/image-3618/dc_fast_charger_custom.jpg
Nissan DC fast Charger
]
 
The big debate for me in the Electric Vehicle world is the one for small
battery, big battery. Nobody may actually understand this debate but I’m
sure many do. The two sides in this debate are EVs with small batteries vs.
EVs with big batteries and which ones are better.

There are two schools of thought out there and over time one school of
thought might win out and the other will pass away. It’s difficult to tell
at the moment which one will prevail but I have my suspicions.

There are many EVs with small battery packs which rely heavily on DC fast
charging to take them on longer trips. The benefits of this school of
thought are that you do NOT have to lug around extra battery weight and
capacity that you will only use once in a while. This keeps the cars initial
purchase price low and in many cases can easily satisfy the USAs average
distances of 40 miles. This does however, limit you on your year’s vacation
trip that is 400 miles from your home. This group of EV pioneers has managed
to complete some crazy stories of nightmare DC fast charging ordeals and
very long trips indeed because of malfunctions, freak weather patterns and
overall neglect.

The Electric cars in this camp are the Mitsubishi iMiev, the Smart EV, the
Ford Focus EV and the Nissan Leaf EV.

The second EV big battery school of thought is currently sitting with Tesla.
Tesla has the most of any current EV offering and yet also has the highest
price tag. It does however, also boast of the lowest cost per watt of energy
storage. This makes the 260 miles range Model S has into an EV camel. It can
easily travel great distances because of the marrying of Tesla’s Fast
Charging network but if these Tesla owners only travel short distances they
wouldn’t need the extra battery capacity. I realize there are many other
reasons for wanting to own a Tesla but that isn’t what I’m talking about
here.

If the average US person drives only 40 miles a day or less, then a double
that range battery would satisfy a great deal of the populations needs
however that 400 mile vacation would be much more doable in the Tesla S but
the rest of the year it is just carrying around extra battery capacity for
no reason. You see my point.

As the EVSE (Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment) continues its roll out into
America, small battery packs will be much more easily accommodative of small
EV battery packs. Once the DC fast charging infrastructure is rolled out,
the less difficult it will be to take the small EV battery pack cars on
longer trips.
[© torquenews.com]




For EVLN EV-newswire posts use:
http://evdl.org/evln/


{brucedp.150m.com}

--
View this message in context: 
http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/EVLN-The-Big-EV-Debate-Go-for-Small-or-Big-Battery-Pack-tp4677796.html
Sent from the Electric Vehicle Discussion List mailing list archive at 
Nabble.com.
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



[EVDL] EVLN: $35k Tesla-3> concept in 4/2016 & production in 2017

2015-09-28 Thread brucedp5 via EV


http://www.nseavoice.com/cars/tesla-model-3-where-art-thou-1002179.html
Tesla Model 3: Where Art Thou?
September 21, 2015

[image  
http://www.nseavoice.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/tesla-model-3.jpg
tesla model 3
]

Tesla Motors has been making history in the automotive industry after they
released the Model S. In less than a month from now, the successful streak
is going to continue with the arrival of the company’s first EV SUV, the
Model X.

Even so, all the excitement is actually with the Model 3 as the vehicle is
going to be the cheapest EV car to ever get produced by Tesla. In detail,
the Model 3 is expected to be the best and most affordable EV car yet. Tesla
has been teasing that the vehicle is going to retail at $35,000.

While it all sounds exciting, nobody has got a clue on when the Model 3 will
actually be ready for a release. That is until today when Tesla teased that
the Model 3 will get its concept model unveiled somewhere in March next year
and the car will head into production in 2017.

When the Model 3 arrives, it is expected to be the biggest threat to
petro-powered cars worldwide. It will be interesting how the other carmakers
respond to the threat of the Model 3.
[© nseavoice.com]
...
http://www.nseavoice.com/tag/tesla-model-3
tesla model 3




For EVLN EV-newswire posts use:
http://evdl.org/evln/


{brucedp.150m.com}

--
View this message in context: 
http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/EVLN-35k-Tesla-3-concept-in-4-2016-production-in-2017-tp4677795.html
Sent from the Electric Vehicle Discussion List mailing list archive at 
Nabble.com.
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



[EVDL] EVLN: 9000km Tesla-S journey through Queensland.au w/o superEVSE

2015-09-28 Thread brucedp5 via EV


http://onestepoffthegrid.com.au/how-a-tesla-travelled-9000kms-through-queensland-without-super-charger-network-part-2/
A Tesla’s 9,000kms journey through Queensland without super-charger network
– Part 2
By Marc Talloen  September 22, 2015

[images  
http://onestepoffthegrid.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/rsz_screen_shot_2015-09-22_at_94028_pm.jpg
Photosynthesis! For the sake of future generations, humans are better off
relying less on fossil fuels and more on renewable energy. Plants give us an
inspiring example.

http://onestepoffthegrid.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/rsz_screen_shot_2015-09-22_at_94845_pm.jpg
(map)

http://onestepoffthegrid.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/rsz_screen_shot_2015-09-22_at_95026_pm.jpg
Ayr showgrounds (left) Five Star restaurant and office facilities (right)

http://onestepoffthegrid.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/rsz_screen_shot_2015-09-22_at_95213_pm.jpg
(Tesla-S towing PV-EVSE trailer)

http://onestepoffthegrid.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/rsz_screen_shot_2015-09-22_at_95514_pm.jpg
(2 Tesla-S EVs in garage)

http://onestepoffthegrid.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/rsz_screen_shot_2015-09-22_at_95842_pm.jpg
(Garage EVSE installation, Tesla-S on the road)

http://onestepoffthegrid.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/rsz_screen_shot_2015-09-22_at_100406_pm.jpg
(map)

http://onestepoffthegrid.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/rsz_screen_shot_2015-09-22_at_100527_pm.jpg
(charging at private residences)

http://onestepoffthegrid.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/rsz_screen_shot_2015-09-22_at_100939_pm.jpg
(Beaches and hinterland)
http://onestepoffthegrid.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/rsz_screen_shot_2015-09-22_at_103014_pm.jpg
]

Last week, in the first part of the series [
http://onestepoffthegrid.com.au/how-a-tesla-travelled-9000kms-through-queensland-without-super-charger-network/
], Marc Talloen began his story about how a Tesla Model S travelled 9,000kms
through regional Queensland without a super-charger network. This is the
second part of the series.

Area 3: From Rockhampton to Ayr, Townsville and Ingham:

Area 3 was more like a transit area to reach our next holiday place. When
driving from Proserpine to Bowen and Townsville I realised how the drought
had affected this area . In the interest of farming and employment wouldn’t
it be feasible to exploit the current competitiveness of renewable energy to
pump more water via extra pipelines from areas such as the Cassowary Coast
to farming areas that are frequently stricken by drought? Higher points
along the pipeline may have potential for energy buffering with dams. From
technological viewpoint it’s absolutely feasible.

The Ayr showground (below) may have great potential for the QLD Electric
Highway plan. It has 2 transformers of 500 kVA each, powerful enough to
charge multiple EVs simultaneously.

Behind the car (above left) you can see my favourite local 5 star restaurant
and luxurious office facilities with scenic outlook (photo right). Behind it
to the right there is a power cabin and transformers. I enjoyed “Ecotourism”
at the bathrooms: creepy fauna showing off their survival skills hiding in
the latrines’ crevices and sending shivers down your spine with their
surprising screams while you’re in full action!

At my first trip North I only had a small battery top-up in Ayr given that I
was expected to charge at Horan & Bird Company, designer / installer of PV
systems in Townsville. However, “Murphy’s law” spoiled that idea as contrary
to our expectations we didn’t find a 3 phase power socket but only one
ChargePoint charger and without a J1172 cable adapter charging was
impossible! An alternative solution shown below was demoed for fun but at
sunset time it definitely lacked the grunt to charge a Tesla MS.

Horan & Bird staff frantically looked for some other building in the area
with a 3 phase 5 pin socket but the next place we went to only had a 3 phase
4 pin socket. Talking to some neighbours in the industrial zone we
unbelievably stumbled (good karma?) upon someone who knew the owner of the
only Tesla MS in Townsville who wholeheartedly offered me to charge at his
place so I could continue my trip North towards Innisfail and Cairns.

Further north from Townsville the scenery slowly started to look greener
with the Paluma Range National Park bordering the highway. We made a short
stop at Balgal Beach for the kids to release the nerves.

On the return trip we stayed overnight in Ingham where we charged the car at
Lathinen Electrical, local designer / installer of solar energy systems. As
you can see below, Daniel quickly modified the 3 phase power socket to serve
our needs. Lathinen Electrical is also very motivated to install a Tesla
Destination Charger to help out Tesla drivers.

[image] Breaking out at Balgal Beach (left) Hinchinbrook Island outlook
(right)

From Ingham we visited Cardwell Beach and made a trip to the magnificent
Wallaman Waterfall, more than 50km inland, partly on unseal