On 11 Jul 2012, at 21:38, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/11/2012 1:09 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
If the boson of Higgs exists, by law, it *must* be retrievable from
addition and multiplication
If comp is true and the argument that everything (arithmetical) is
realized holds.
I am not sure what
On 11 Jul 2012, at 23:39, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/11/2012 10:36 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru
wrote:
In Germany theology still belongs to universities. What I like is
that you will find as a department of theoretical theology as
On 12 Jul 2012, at 00:30, John Mikes wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
Esse is not percipi. With comp. Esse is more is a solution to a
diophantine polynomial equation.
St.:You have merely replaced the Atoms of the
On 12 Jul 2012, at 00:44, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/11/2012 2:22 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 11 Jul 2012, at 22:17, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/11/2012 6:23 AM, David Nyman wrote:
On 11 July 2012 09:55, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
wrote:
Even the phisical TOE is part of this second
On 12 Jul 2012, at 02:39, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 7/11/2012 4:30 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/11/2012 7:32 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
In your work you seem to posit that numbers have minds (thus
they can dream) and that their ideas are passive and yet can
reproduce all phenomena that
On 7/12/2012 1:08 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 11 Jul 2012, at 23:39, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/11/2012 10:36 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru
mailto:use...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
In Germany theology still belongs to universities. What I
On 7/12/2012 1:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Jul 2012, at 00:30, John Mikes wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
*_Esse is not percipi_*. With comp. Esse is more is a solution to a
diophantine
polynomial
On 12 Jul 2012, at 11:25, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/12/2012 1:08 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 11 Jul 2012, at 23:39, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/11/2012 10:36 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi
use...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
In Germany theology still belongs to
On 12 Jul 2012, at 11:34, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/12/2012 1:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Jul 2012, at 00:30, John Mikes wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
Esse is not percipi. With comp. Esse is more is a solution to a
diophantine
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 1:36:32 PM UTC-4, John K Clark wrote:
I disagree, I don't like it. You are assuming that there exists a
organized field of knowledge called theology, but I can not find the
slightest evidence that is in fact true. Lawrence Krauss said that it is
his habit to
On 11.07.2012 19:36 John Clark said the following:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru
wrote:
In Germany theology still belongs to universities. What I like is
that you will find as a department of theoretical theology as well
as a department of practical theology.
On 11.07.2012 18:26 John Clark said the following:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
It is hard to imagine how free will can operate if our behavior is
determined by physical law
Does that mean you CAN imagine how free will can operate if our
behavior is NOT
On 11.07.2012 18:21 John Clark said the following:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
I understand but the question in principle still remains. Who
play the
chess, I or the M-theory?
There is no logical reason to think those two ways of explaining the
same
On 10.07.2012 21:48 meekerdb said the following:
On 7/10/2012 12:38 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Hence according to the authors, the M-theory governs absolutely
everything including social sciences. But I am afraid that this is
not what you would expect.
Why would you not expect a
On 10.07.2012 20:38 Stephen P. King said the following:
Say that it is not so!
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428428/higgs-boson-may-be-an-imposter-say-particle/?ref=rss
Hi Stephen,
Recently I have read
Karin Knorr Cetina, Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge
This
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
I profoundly disagree. What was found was a curve when the raw data
was graphed in a particular way. There is no proof that this curve is
uniquely representational of some particle.
The article certainly
On 7/12/2012 3:36 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 10.07.2012 20:38 Stephen P. King said the following:
Say that it is not so!
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428428/higgs-boson-may-be-an-imposter-say-particle/?ref=rss
Hi Stephen,
Recently I have read
Karin Knorr Cetina, Epistemic
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
To reject *all* theologies, you need *a* theology.
Like God this is a example is somebody willing to abandon a idea but not
a word; so God becomes something more powerful than yourself and now
theology becomes any field of study you
On 7/12/2012 12:27 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 11.07.2012 18:21 John Clark said the following:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
I understand but the question in principle still remains. Who
play the
chess, I or the M-theory?
There is no logical reason to
On 7/12/2012 12:28 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 10.07.2012 21:48 meekerdb said the following:
On 7/10/2012 12:38 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Hence according to the authors, the M-theory governs absolutely
everything including social sciences. But I am afraid that this is
not what you would
On 7/12/2012 12:55 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net
mailto:stephe...@charter.net wrote:
I profoundly disagree. What was found was a curve when the raw data was
graphed in
a particular way. There is no proof that this curve
On 7/11/2012 6:47 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Stephen:
Well it愀 not cooperation between computer programs, but cooperation
of entities in the abstract level. This can be described
mathematically or simulated in a computer program. In both cases, it
starts with a game with its rules goals
On 7/11/2012 6:47 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Matt Rydley what is human is a good introduction.
From: http://www.scribd.com/doc/47413560/69/MATT-RIDLEY
MATT RIDLEY
Science Writer; Founding chairman of the International Centre for Life;
Author,F
rancis Crick: Discoverer of the Genetic Code
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
Then we should stop teaching Newtonian physics as well, since there are
no new advances there either.
Not so. A hurricane simulation is pure Newtonian physics and yet they are
far far better now, that is to say they
On 7/12/2012 1:08 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
To reject *all* theologies, you need *a* theology.
Like God this is a example is somebody willing to abandon a idea but not a word; so
God becomes something
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
I am not an expert in this field
There are no experts in this field because there is no field.
but here is for example just a link to the university in Freiburg
2012/7/12 Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net
On 7/11/2012 6:47 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Stephen:
Well it´s not cooperation between computer programs, but cooperation of
entities in the abstract level. This can be described mathematically or
simulated in a computer program. In both
On 7/12/2012 4:04 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
We each one are free riders because we are selfish collaborators. A twist on selfish
collaboration is the self deception: our memory is unconsciously distorted to support
our case. we thinkl that we deserve more than the fair share etc.
Free
Right. free rider is a pure defector. In a more realistic game, the
entities can act with mixed strategies, sometimes as free riders, others as
collaborators. This is the meaning of selfish collaborators. With the
addition that, sometimes, what benefits the individual benefits also the
On 7/12/2012 7:04 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2012/7/12 Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net
mailto:stephe...@charter.net
On 7/11/2012 6:47 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Stephen:
Well it愀 not cooperation between computer programs, but
cooperation of entities in the
On 7/12/2012 7:42 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/12/2012 4:04 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
We each one are free riders because we are selfish collaborators. A
twist on selfish collaboration is the self deception: our memory is
unconsciously distorted to support our case. we thinkl that we
deserve
31 matches
Mail list logo
