On 05 Oct 2013, at 19:55, John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
you have agreed that all bruno marchal are the original one (a
case where Leibniz identity rule fails,
If you're talking about Leibniz Identity of indiscernibles it most
On 06 Oct 2013, at 01:29, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 10:34:11AM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 05 Oct 2013, at 10:05, Russell Standish wrote:
I get that Bp is the statement that I can prove p, and that Bp p
is
the statement that I know p (assuming Theatetus, of
On 06 Oct 2013, at 03:17, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 5 October 2013 00:40, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
The argument is simply summarised thus: it is impossible even for
God
to make a brain prosthesis that reproduces the I/O behaviour but has
different qualia. This is a proof
Some academies are just prostituted to rotten (sometime) politics, often
just to get enough funding to survive.
Money is not the problem. Black, obscure and grey money is the problem.
Wait, this is indeed the most fundamental question!
*How knowledge interact with money and power in
On 10/6/2013 12:43 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 05 Oct 2013, at 19:55, John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
you have agreed that all bruno marchal are the original one (a case
where
Leibniz identity rule
On 10/6/2013 9:08 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Some academies are just prostituted to rotten (sometime) politics, often
just to get
enough funding to survive.
Money is not the problem. Black, obscure and grey money is the problem.
Wait, this is indeed the most fundamental
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
The M-guy is the H-guy (the M-guy remembers having been the H-guy)
The H-guy turns into the M-guy, but they are not identical just as you are
not identical with the Bruno Marchal of yesterday.
The W-guy is the H-guy
On Sunday, October 6, 2013 5:06:31 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Oct 2013, at 03:17, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 5 October 2013 00:40, Bruno Marchal mar...@ulb.ac.be javascript:
wrote:
The argument is simply summarised thus: it is impossible even for
God
to make a
2013/10/6 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 10/6/2013 9:08 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Some academies are just prostituted to rotten (sometime) politics,
often just to get enough funding to survive.
Money is not the problem. Black, obscure and grey money is the problem.
Wait, this
On 7 October 2013 06:48, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
The M-guy is the H-guy (the M-guy remembers having been the H-guy)
The H-guy turns into the M-guy, but they are not identical just as you
are not
Thanks. I have a feeling I have already read this but will have a look.
(Admittedly I haven't finished the other one yet...)
On 5 October 2013 15:34, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au wrote:
We did talk about this paper about a year ago - maybe on foar.
I agree its interesting, though.
On 10/6/2013 1:02 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2013/10/6 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
On 10/6/2013 9:08 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Some academies are just prostituted to rotten (sometime) politics,
often just
to get enough funding to
On 7 October 2013 13:12, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
All you've done is fuzzy up uncertainty reduction so it can serve as an
explanation for anything. That was my objection of Nietzsche's will to
power: In a straightforward reading it's false. After enough explication
it's turned
On 7 October 2013 09:02, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
But there is something altruistic also (well the former is not so egoistic
at last) Sir Helmunt Hillary climbed the Everest not only for himself, but
for England. Because he wanted the flag of England to wave above all
On 7 October 2013 13:26, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 October 2013 09:02, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
But there is something altruistic also (well the former is not so
egoistic at last) Sir Helmunt Hillary climbed the Everest not only for
himself, but for England.
On 10/6/2013 1:48 PM, LizR wrote:
On 7 October 2013 06:48, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com mailto:johnkcl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
The M-guy is the H-guy (the M-guy remembers having
On 10/6/2013 5:24 PM, LizR wrote:
On 7 October 2013 13:12, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
All you've done is fuzzy up uncertainty reduction so it can serve as an
explanation for anything. That was my objection of Nietzsche's will to
power: In
a
On 7 October 2013 14:20, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 10/6/2013 5:24 PM, LizR wrote:
On 7 October 2013 13:12, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
All you've done is fuzzy up uncertainty reduction so it can serve as
an explanation for anything. That was my objection of
Hi Brent
This is true, but it's also something Bruno has said many times. If comp is
correct (to the extent that the mind is a computation, at least) then this
is happening all the time. Heraclitus was right, you aren't the same person
even from one second to the next.
I think Heraclitus
Unfortunately, the thread about AUDA and its relation to pronouncs got
mixed up with another thread, and thus got delete on my computer.
Picking up from where we left off, I'm still trying to see the
relationship between Bp, Bpp, 1-I, 3-I and the plain ordinary I
pronoun in English.
I understand
20 matches
Mail list logo
