You cannot dance at two weddings as they in Texas. There are sometimes
situations where things, I have to tell you, render themselves as Manichean,
sorry to say. Sometimes, its they hand that we are dealt and are forced to
play. Why have wars, if we don't have the tenacity and the bloodymindedn
I have a feeling that the idea of "no safe dosage" of radiation was
popularised in Rosalie Bertell's "No Immediate Danger" which I seem to
remember was a big seller at the time (mid 80s).
http://www.amazon.com/No-Immediate-Danger-Prognosis-Radioactive/dp/0913990256
--
You received this message b
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 7:34 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: American Intelligence
Because the nuances of national defense, according to everything you have
stated and suggested,
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com]
I dare to disagree with fearless leader and his party! The gulags were run by
people with this kind of thinking. How dare I judge the leadership by what it
yields, rather then adherence to ideology, or ko
On 7/5/2014 5:08 AM, David Nyman wrote:
On 5 July 2014 06:27, meekerdb wrote:
Ok, maybe it's mostly a matter of semantics. I don't exclude things as not
existing just because they are not part of the primitive ontology.
But of course I haven't been saying these things don't exist. On the
cont
Yeah, you do have a point. I don't have specific candidates that would be so
much better. To misquote Benjamin Franklin, "Its a plutocracy, madam, if you
can keep it." The Republican Party is run by the US Chamber of Commerce, the
Kochs, the Dems, by Soros, Tom Steyer, the Blackstone Group, and
I dare to disagree with fearless leader and his party! The gulags were run by
people with this kind of thinking. How dare I judge the leadership by what it
yields, rather then adherence to ideology, or kowtow because the dude has
African genetics? How dare I? Tee-hee-hee!!
-Original Mes
I have toyed with the idea, not only for ourselves, but for the Islamists,
especially, the idea, or proof of a virtual existence-resurrection, and such.
If we can present this as doable it has benefits, for us and them. It could end
some of the violence.
They are still mired in a religious dr
Hey, I'm just a flying monkey, anyways. The most fearful thing in the movie
were not the monkeys or the witch, but the tornado at the beginning, which at a
young age I knew was real. Nyuck!
That's what it was supposed to remind you of :-)
-Original Message-
From: LizR
To: everyt
Because the nuances of national defense, according to everything you have
stated and suggested, is that we would need to sustain a heavy domestic attack,
before you'd send American boots marching. You see it as an unclean, dirty,
rightwing, imperialist thing, or most likely, and inside job by t
I am good on Reason mag stuff, Telmo, and I did mention trying other things.
But the non-total war thing also should be on the table. Let the Jihad know
what they face, and this is one reason, one less incentive, for them to attack.
This was my original pov, which caused one poster here to beco
Brent, the cry of racism has become as Dr. Johnson, once wrote of patriotism,
the last refuge of a scoundrel. Progressives scream it when they have run out
of ideas to defend the indefensible. When you cry, Koch's I will say, SOROS,
when you put forth Addelson, I will say, Tom Steyer. It ain't
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 11:49:08AM +1200, LizR wrote:
> My 2cI seem to recall hearing that people exposed to higher than what
> is considered normal doses of radiation actually have improved tolerance
> and get less cancers etc, though I can't recall where I saw/read/heard it.
>
> But that obv
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 4:49 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: How dangerous is radiation?
My 2cI seem to recall hearing that people exposed to higher than what
My 2cI seem to recall hearing that people exposed to higher than what
is considered normal doses of radiation actually have improved tolerance
and get less cancers etc, though I can't recall where I saw/read/heard it.
But that obviously doesn't include if any of the stuff gets into your body.
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 1:40 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: American Intelligence
On 5 July 2014 04:14, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
wrote:
You see
On 5 July 2014 04:14, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> You seem like such a bitter person, impossibly convinced of your own
> righteousness and seeing the world go wrong; it must wound you deep. So
> deep you feel the need to continuously spam th
On 5 July 2014 04:36, spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> I just recognize and sort of respect that other people think differently,
> then myself. Sometimes, we are offered Manichean choices, rather than
> indicate that its a personal, American flaw. Its not
On 4 July 2014 23:12, spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Reminds me of the Wizard giving the Tin Man a Diploma at the end of OZ.
> What they do have, my good fellow, is a Diploma!"
>
> I have a diploma, which many people think is as good as a brain...
>
> T
On 05 Jul 2014, at 14:08, David Nyman wrote:
On 5 July 2014 06:27, meekerdb wrote:
Ok, maybe it's mostly a matter of semantics. I don't exclude things
as not
existing just because they are not part of the primitive ontology.
But of course I haven't been saying these things don't exist. O
All of these studies reference externally received radiation and do not address
the very different situation of radionuclides becoming incorporated or lodged
into living tissue. What is the long term effect of a radionuclide – radiating
the same cluster of cells immediately adjacent to it in bod
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> tell me if you believe in a primitively existing physical reality, or
>> if you are open to the possibility that the fundamental reality is
>> arithmetic
>>
>
> >> If I were religious I'd give you an answer to that question because
> religi
Everybody agrees that huge amounts of radiation are harmful or fatal,
especially if received virtually instantaneously as in Hiroshima and
Nagasaki, but do more moderate amounts received much more slowly really
increase the likelihood of getting cancer and death years later? All our
public policy r
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 4:55 PM, John Mikes wrote:
> Liz:
> can't you get out of the reilgious obsession? Does EVERYTHING not include
> more exciting (and maybe closer, to solvable) topics?
> John Mikes
>
Ok, but that would be your religion, John :-)
I think Liz's post is not only modest and fun
On 5 July 2014 06:27, meekerdb wrote:
> Ok, maybe it's mostly a matter of semantics. I don't exclude things as not
> existing just because they are not part of the primitive ontology.
But of course I haven't been saying these things don't exist. On the
contrary, I've been labouring to differenti
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 12:38 AM, spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Well, my question is, are you automatically, dismissing jihadi terrorism
> as a chimera, a false threat, a non-issue?
http://reason.com/archives/2011/09/06/how-scared-of-terrorism-should
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 12:05 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean,
non-digital, computer architecture
On 04 Jul 2014, at 20:51, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/4/2014 11:05 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
...but even if the God of the theists does not exist, he might
still have important relationships with the Plotinus ONE, or even
with the notion of arithmetical truth as pointed too by a machine.
Which ag
On 04 Jul 2014, at 20:43, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com
] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
On 04 Jul 2014, at 10:36, LizR wrote:
On 4 July 2014 18:16, meekerdb wrote:
This kind of classification
On 04 Jul 2014, at 20:41, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/4/2014 9:25 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I define theology by the study of the truth about you and not-you,
if you want. Science is the subpart concerned with what is 3p
communicable, or relatively communicable, and the proper theology
contains
30 matches
Mail list logo
