On 08-05-2022 05:58, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Sun, May 8, 2022 at 11:32 AM smitra wrote:
On 05-05-2022 01:15, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 5:27 AM smitra wrote:
On 04-05-2022 01:49, Bruce Kellett wrote:
I have not introduced any concept of probability. The 2^N
branches
On 08-05-2022 06:03, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 5/7/2022 6:21 PM, smitra wrote:
On 05-05-2022 00:04, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 5/4/2022 12:27 PM, smitra wrote:
In
fact, that idea introduces a raft of problems of its own -- what
is
the measure over this infinity of branches? What does it mean to
On 5/8/2022 1:50 PM, smitra wrote:
On 08-05-2022 06:03, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 5/7/2022 6:21 PM, smitra wrote:
On 05-05-2022 00:04, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 5/4/2022 12:27 PM, smitra wrote:
In
fact, that idea introduces a raft of problems of its own -- what
is
the measure over this infinity
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 10:32 AM Brent Meeker wrote:
> On 5/8/2022 5:25 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 10:17 AM Brent Meeker
> wrote:
>
>> On 5/8/2022 3:42 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 6:37 AM smitra wrote:
>>
>>> On 08-05-2022 05:58, Bruce Kellett
On 08-05-2022 06:04, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Sun, May 8, 2022 at 11:21 AM smitra wrote:
The issues with branches etc. are likely just artifacts with making
hidden assumptions about branches. At the end of the day there are
only
a finite number of states an observer can be in. If an observer
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 10:17 AM Brent Meeker wrote:
> On 5/8/2022 3:42 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 6:37 AM smitra wrote:
>
>> On 08-05-2022 05:58, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>>
>> > It is when you take the SE to imply that all possible outcomes exist
>> > on each trial. That
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 6:52 AM smitra wrote:
> On 08-05-2022 06:04, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> > On Sun, May 8, 2022 at 11:21 AM smitra wrote:
> >
> >> The issues with branches etc. are likely just artifacts with making
> >> hidden assumptions about branches. At the end of the day there are
> >>
On 5/8/2022 3:42 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 6:37 AM smitra wrote:
On 08-05-2022 05:58, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> It is when you take the SE to imply that all possible outcomes exist
> on each trial. That gives all outcomes equal status.
All outcomes can
On 5/8/2022 5:25 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 10:17 AM Brent Meeker
wrote:
On 5/8/2022 3:42 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 6:37 AM smitra wrote:
On 08-05-2022 05:58, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> It is when you take the SE to imply
On 08-05-2022 05:56, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Sun, May 8, 2022 at 11:40 AM smitra wrote:
On 05-05-2022 01:57, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 5:27 AM smitra wrote:
Of course you can. The lottery example shows that even in
classical
physics you can imagine this happening. If
On 5/8/2022 5:39 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 10:32 AM Brent Meeker
wrote:
On 5/8/2022 5:25 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 10:17 AM Brent Meeker
wrote:
On 5/8/2022 3:42 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 6:37
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 12:47 PM Brent Meeker wrote:
> On 5/8/2022 5:39 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 10:32 AM Brent Meeker
> wrote:
>
>> On 5/8/2022 5:25 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 10:17 AM Brent Meeker
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I don't think that's
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 6:37 AM smitra wrote:
> On 08-05-2022 05:58, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
> > It is when you take the SE to imply that all possible outcomes exist
> > on each trial. That gives all outcomes equal status.
>
> All outcomes can exist without these being equally likely. One can make
On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 7:18 PM Bruce Kellett wrote:
*> Everett's theory does not attach a probability to branches -- it just
> says that they all happen. And that is the biggest failure of Everett's
> theory*
>
Now Bruce, we both know if probability didn't enter into Everett's idea
then his PhD
The distinction between van der Waals force and the Casimir effect is not
clear, and both have to do with what might be called quantum atmospheres. I
proposed years ago how the Casimir vacuum could be pumped to generate
coherent laser-like states. The Josephson-Junction is a soliton result in
I have not been following this. However, your formula for the gravitational
force should be F = -GMm/r^2, with the acceleration a = -GM/r^2. It appears
you wrote the equation for the velocity of an orbit.
LC
On Friday, May 6, 2022 at 6:36:38 AM UTC-5 johnk...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm changing
Superposition and entanglement are different manifestations of a quantum
phase.
LC
On Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 3:32:33 PM UTC-5 leeu...@gmail.com wrote:
> May be of interest:
>
> Entanglement and Superposition Are Equivalent Concepts in Any Physical
> Theory
>
> ABSTRACT
>
> We prove that
On Sun, May 8, 2022 at 8:09 AM Lawrence Crowell <
goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> wrote:
*> I have not been following this. However, your formula for the
> gravitational force should be F = -GMm/r^2, with the acceleration a =
> -GM/r^2. It appears you wrote the equation for the velocity of an
18 matches
Mail list logo
