Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
The harmful effects of the consumption of intoxicants for the individual and its consequent effects on society are observable. The bans are in thus in the larger interest. However, if cannabis and other drugs have some medicinal benefits, then the research should continue to find the correct, beneficial use of them, as well as the side-effects. In Islam, consumption of intoxicants are discouraged. The arabic word used for intoxicants, in the Quran, is al-khamr. The root alphabets of the word are kh-m-r which means to cover or hide something. Intoxicants, it implies, cover the intellect, and thus are discouraged. It is explained: [Quran 2:219] They ask you about intoxicants and games of chance. Say: In both of them there is a great sin and means of profit for men, and their sin is greater than their profit... The word used for sin also means frustration; tiredness; laziness. Thus, I gather, both mind and body eventually suffer from the harmful effects of the intoxicant, and thus the negatives far outweigh the benefits. Initially, the believers were advised to pray when in a clear state of mind, and not when under the influence of intoxicants: : [Quran 4:43] O you who believe! do not go near prayer when you are Intoxicated until you know (well) what you say,... Gradually, they were exhorted to refrain from it altogether: [Quran 5:90] O ye who believe! Intoxicants and gambling, (dedication of) stones, and (divination by) arrows, are an abomination,- of Satan's handwork: eschew such (abomination), that ye may prosper. References: [Quran 2:219] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=2from_verse=218to_verse=220mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 [Quran 4:43] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=4from_verse=42to_verse=44mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 [Quran 5:90] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=5from_verse=89to_verse=92mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 Samiya On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 3:52 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 4/18/2014 7:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: What society thinks has nothing to do with it, because weak correlation-based scientific evidence is used selectively to create laws that were desired a priori by some interest group. That implies some nefarious motive and corrupt use of data known to be wrong. In fact there was no nefarious 'interest group' that wanted to ban marijuana or to ban alcohol or to ban heroin. All these bans were initiated by people who believed in the ill effects of these substances for individuals and for society. In many cases they had personal experience. That the bans may have given rise to criminal activities to circumvent them, isn't to the point of their origin. Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On 18 Apr 2014, at 22:33, ghib...@gmail.com wrote: Physorg runs a report today in which brain abnormalities are linked with cannabis use, http://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-04-casual-marijuana-linked-brain-abnormalities.html#ajTabs Sounds pretty serious. Sure, and we have to take all data into account. What that paper show is just negligible compared to the use of alcohol. Also, they talk about joint, which is not marjiuana, but a mixture tobacco and marijuana, and it is not clear if they have verified that the person did not also drink alcohol. Then all studies I read shows that cannabis augments the number of neurons, and it is not clear in what sense those deformations constitutes a problem. But, anyway, I don't think it makes any sense to ban a drug, as all studies shows that when it is illegal, you give the market to people who will not ask the ID to their clients. On the contrary, the criminals will target the kids, and get the mean to sell the drug without any price and quality control. So a proof that cannabis *is* bad for the health is automatically a reason more to make it legal: to protect the kids. As a teacher, the statistics on the bad effect of alcohol matches the personal experience, but this is not true with cannabis. Having taught more than 40 years, I have never seen any problem with cannabis, but a lot with mixture cannabis/tobacco, and the worst: cannabis + alcohol. My point is not that cannabis is an innocent drug. None are, but my point is based with the comparative dangers between all drugs in the matter of banning them (assuming that makes sense). Cannabis does not kill, unlike aspirin, sugar, chocolate, etc. That comparative aspect needs to be present in all papers on which a political decision can be inspired. In that respect, cannsbis seems the safest psychotropic known today. You link contains a link which relativize such findings: http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-09-association-frequency-marijuana-health-healthcare.html It is like the discovery that marijuana tar is much more carcinogenic than tobacco tar. That is verified in the laboratory, but not reflected in the population studies, and the reason is that the cancer protection of cannabis might compensate largely its carcinogenic effect. There were no reason to make cannabis illegal at the start, and there is no reason today. Smoking cannabis remains infinitely less dangerous than breathing in urban environment, or eating non-bio fruits, etc. There are just many things which should be banned before cannabis. But again, the danger of a drug is not a reason to ban it, but to legalize it. In my country, they have tested free distribution of heroin and needles, and the result were positive: its consumption diminishes, the violence diminishes, the number of AID case diminishes, etc. Bruno -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On 19 Apr 2014, at 00:52, meekerdb wrote: On 4/18/2014 7:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: What society thinks has nothing to do with it, because weak correlation-based scientific evidence is used selectively to create laws that were desired a priori by some interest group. That implies some nefarious motive and corrupt use of data known to be wrong. In fact there was no nefarious 'interest group' that wanted to ban marijuana or to ban alcohol or to ban heroin. What? For marijuana, there were a lot. Anslinger was asked to find eveidence that cannabis was worst than alcohol. he destoyed the results which showed that cannabis is much less dangerous than alcohol. Nixon, Chirac (in France), adn also people in the UK, will destroyed such records too. It is a made up since the start. That is why some people still speculate on dangers, for which there are no corresponding complains, with very few exception by person who abuse, and would probably not in case it would be legal. All these bans were initiated by people who believed in the ill effects of these substances for individuals and for society. I have no clue why you say this. In many cases they had personal experience. The first year of use of consumption of marjuana can be impressive, and by its paranoid effect, enhance in case of illegality. I don't know people complaining about cannabis, I mean in the statistical sense, compared to other products. That the bans may have given rise to criminal activities to circumvent them, isn't to the point of their origin. I have stopped to believe that prohibition has anything to do with drug problem. Google on youtube marijuana history. Its origin is in racism (Anslinger) + unfair competition with oil, and I get evidence it was orchestrated by criminals, in fact as a recycling of the alcohol prohibitionist machinery. Drugs must be regulated, and we know today that illegality is what which makes them dangerous. You can also look at the site of LEAP (an organization of war on drug cops veteran who understood the complete nonsense and the perverse effect of prohibition: http://www.leap.cc/ You will find many references which explains the non sense of prohibition of drugs, and its real motivation. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:52 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 4/18/2014 7:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: What society thinks has nothing to do with it, because weak correlation-based scientific evidence is used selectively to create laws that were desired a priori by some interest group. That implies some nefarious motive and corrupt use of data known to be wrong. In fact there was no nefarious 'interest group' that wanted to ban marijuana or to ban alcohol or to ban heroin. All these bans were initiated by people who believed in the ill effects of these substances for individuals and for society. In many cases they had personal experience. That the bans may have given rise to criminal activities to circumvent them, isn't to the point of their origin. I never claimed that any data was wrong. What I said was that correlations are weak evidence, and that many studies show correlation for all sorts of things. Furthermore, these correlations are used selectively when it comes to legislating. For this we have hard evidence: there is much stronger scientific evidence against alcohol and tobacco than cannabis, yet the former are legal while the latter is illegal. In the UK, Professor David Nutt was sacked from his position as chairman of the government advisory board on the misuse of drugs for analysing scientific evidence and coming to the conclusion that alcohol was more dangerous than ecstasy, LSD and cannabis: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/oct/30/drugs-adviser-david-nutt-sacked http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/oct/29/nutt-drugs-policy-reform-call?guni=Article:in%20body%20link Then, the cultivation of industrial help -- which is not psychoactive -- was also made illegal. Industrial has a wide range of applications: paper, fabric, building material and cheap protein source, to name a few. It threatens several industries and it is not a narcotic. How do you explain that? Telmo. Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On 19 Apr 2014, at 08:42, Samiya Illias wrote: The harmful effects of the consumption of intoxicants for the individual and its consequent effects on society are observable. The bans are in thus in the larger interest. This does not follow. Banning intoxicant augments the intoxicant consumption, and so, if that is bad, it leads to the contrary effect than the one desired. However, if cannabis and other drugs have some medicinal benefits, then the research should continue to find the correct, beneficial use of them, as well as the side-effects. Sure. In Islam, consumption of intoxicants are discouraged. The arabic word used for intoxicants, in the Quran, is al-khamr. The root alphabets of the word are kh-m-r which means to cover or hide something. Intoxicants, it implies, cover the intellect, and thus are discouraged. Does it? The Sufi thinks differently (as you know and can see by searching sufi drug use. For them, some psychotropic does not cover the intellect, but discover it. It is explained: [Quran 2:219] They ask you about intoxicants and games of chance. Say: In both of them there is a great sin and means of profit for men, and their sin is greater than their profit... That is an authoritative argument. You must understand that this is not a good point for the Quran, or that interpretation of the Quran. How can *you* be sure if the prophet did not misunderstood God? The word used for sin also means frustration; tiredness; laziness. Thus, I gather, both mind and body eventually suffer from the harmful effects of the intoxicant, and thus the negatives far outweigh the benefits. Initially, the believers were advised to pray when in a clear state of mind, and not when under the influence of intoxicants: : [Quran 4:43] O you who believe! do not go near prayer when you are Intoxicated until you know (well) what you say,... Gradually, they were exhorted to refrain from it altogether: [Quran 5:90] O ye who believe! Intoxicants and gambling, (dedication of) stones, and (divination by) arrows, are an abomination,- of Satan's handwork: eschew such (abomination), that ye may prosper. References: [Quran 2:219] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=2from_verse=218to_verse=220mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 [Quran 4:43] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=4from_verse=42to_verse=44mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 [Quran 5:90] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=5from_verse=89to_verse=92mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 Conventional religion have a tradition of forbidding anything which can lead to psychotropic experience, if not mystic experience, because they have decided of what is truth, and psychotropic experience are able to question it, and usually leads to making the doubt greater. In the religious matter, even more than in science, I think we cannot let other people think for you. In my religion, you can caricature the prophets, even God, and you can burn the sacred text without blaspheming, but then you *do* a genuine blasphem when you dare to talk in its name. You can only trust God to talk directly to the heart of the people. You can't suggest any action or inaction in its name, as it becomes the worst authoritative and manipulative argument. There are just no human intermediate between you and God. Contemplation community, and dances, prayers, can be allowed, but nobody can decide actions and inactions, and normalize behavior in Its Name. If you believe in God, trust him. To be sure, there is no problem liking sacred texts, but not for any normative action. Some intoxicant can help to understand this, and that is why, I think, some tradition and societies wanting to control you, are condemning them. Of course, in the Abramanic religion, God can be seen as the first prohibitionist, and the first to suggest that prohibition can't work. Explain me how God, with his infinite power, has not been able to control a population having only two individuals, Adam and Eve. How could He not prevent them to consume the illicit fruit of knowledge? Answer: he planned them to have the choice and get the knowledge. He might permit the shortcut between Earth and Heaven, but not the use of it to manipulate the others and talk in His name. Bruno Samiya On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 3:52 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 4/18/2014 7:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: What society thinks has nothing to do with it, because weak correlation-based scientific evidence is used selectively to create laws that were desired a priori by some interest group. That implies some nefarious motive and corrupt use of data known to be wrong.
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On 19-Apr-2014, at 1:15 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote: On 19 Apr 2014, at 08:42, Samiya Illias wrote: The harmful effects of the consumption of intoxicants for the individual and its consequent effects on society are observable. The bans are in thus in the larger interest. This does not follow. Banning intoxicant augments the intoxicant consumption, and so, if that is bad, it leads to the contrary effect than the one desired. Agree to disagree :) However, if cannabis and other drugs have some medicinal benefits, then the research should continue to find the correct, beneficial use of them, as well as the side-effects. Sure. In Islam, consumption of intoxicants are discouraged. The arabic word used for intoxicants, in the Quran, is al-khamr. The root alphabets of the word are kh-m-r which means to cover or hide something. Intoxicants, it implies, cover the intellect, and thus are discouraged. Does it? The Sufi thinks differently (as you know and can see by searching sufi drug use. For them, some psychotropic does not cover the intellect, but discover it. I am aware of the Sufi branch and thought. However, I am only quoting the Quran, the original Arabic text, which all sects agree upon as the Book revealed to Prophet Muhammad, which has not undergone any change, and is preserved in written form as well as in the memory of millions of human beings till this day. If something is intoxicating the mind, then how can it be considered safe to 'discover the intellect' unless the intellect has not yet been discovered? ;) In that case, in the absence of an active intellect, can such a person be expected to making a rational decision of choosing whether or not to 'use the drug'?? It is explained: [Quran 2:219] They ask you about intoxicants and games of chance. Say: In both of them there is a great sin and means of profit for men, and their sin is greater than their profit... That is an authoritative argument. You must understand that this is not a good point for the Quran, or that interpretation of the Quran. How can *you* be sure if the prophet did not misunderstood God? The original Arabic words of the Quran have not suffered any change over the centuries. They are not the words of the Prophet. He was only the messenger, transmitting the revelation as received. Have you come across any human book which has about 6236 sentences, and millions of people know it by heart completely, from beginning till end? This original manuscript is protected from human interpretation... The word used for sin also means frustration; tiredness; laziness. Thus, I gather, both mind and body eventually suffer from the harmful effects of the intoxicant, and thus the negatives far outweigh the benefits. Initially, the believers were advised to pray when in a clear state of mind, and not when under the influence of intoxicants: : [Quran 4:43] O you who believe! do not go near prayer when you are Intoxicated until you know (well) what you say,... Gradually, they were exhorted to refrain from it altogether: [Quran 5:90] O ye who believe! Intoxicants and gambling, (dedication of) stones, and (divination by) arrows, are an abomination,- of Satan's handwork: eschew such (abomination), that ye may prosper. References: [Quran 2:219] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=2from_verse=218to_verse=220mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 [Quran 4:43] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=4from_verse=42to_verse=44mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 [Quran 5:90] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=5from_verse=89to_verse=92mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 Conventional religion have a tradition of forbidding anything which can lead to psychotropic experience, if not mystic experience, because they have decided of what is truth, and psychotropic experience are able to question it, and usually leads to making the doubt greater. In the religious matter, even more than in science, I think we cannot let other people think for you. Exactly! That is why we must not be under the influence of any intoxicant so as to be able to think clearly! In my religion, you can caricature the prophets, even God, and you can burn the sacred text without blaspheming, but then you *do* a genuine blasphem when you dare to talk in its name. If I'm misguided, then you are right. However, I earnestly believe that the Quran is God-sent and it helps us understand our purpose here on Earth, and where we are headed. You can only trust God to talk directly to the heart of the people. You can't suggest any action or inaction in its name, as it becomes
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
No wonder you guys are so enthusiastic about anthropogenic warming ( I concur but not like you do) cause you been rock'in the Ganj!! Y'all voted for Bob Marley for PM, and he's been off-planet for 25 years. Irae mon. Your ears hearing the skankin sounds while yer butt be feeling those spanking sounds. On the other hand in the US we elected a constitutional lawyer and head of the choom gang our president. See, the climate gets warmed up by all yer bongs. That's it. -Original Message- From: Platonist Guitar Cowboy multiplecit...@gmail.com To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Fri, Apr 18, 2014 8:45 am Subject: Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate. If one places Cannabis' danger into perspective of danger of other poisons, you can however point to relative safety and potential efficacy as medication for a variety of ailments. See Prof. David Nutts research that was brought up on this list in the past. And yet nobody states seriously that any poison is harmless; we just seem to live in a world that can't do without them on a variety of levels at this time. From fossil fuels to heroin. PGC On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote: The causes schizophrenia is correlation based conjecture. Not strongly convincing, because I bet all the subjects consumed sugar and were involved in variety of other behaviors and consumptions. People don't live in test tube and the results of questionnaires and tests of this sort should be taken with a large grain of salt. It's just easy science to make money with and get funds for, from appropriate interests. To be able to single out that it was the Cannabis in all these people's lives as exclusive cause, and not merely trigger of latent tendency, is too strong. You can say we suppose, correlation, because reason x, sample size y. A lot of things can precipitate psychosis in patients that already have some predisposition. We're talking poison, so ghibbsa, you're barking up the wrong tree if you're claiming that some people claim it innocent. But you're right: it's more the world that people live in than the poison itself. If your perspective is a dead end job of being mechanically exploited and underpaid below ability to survive and make a living, and no exit is palpable, then you have increased poison use; without that, I think we'd see more breakdowns, psychosis, and crimes happening. It is asking too much to expect that segment of society to function properly while being shafted. PGC On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:17 AM, ghib...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday, April 18, 2014 8:52:50 AM UTC+1, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 18 Apr 2014, at 08:41, ghi...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday, April 18, 2014 7:28:26 AM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday, April 18, 2014 7:28:02 AM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, April 17, 2014 8:03:09 PM UTC+1, Bruno Marchal wrote: Hi, A good sum up of the how and why cannabis might cure cancers. You can understand the mechanism and the probabilities. It is a pretty good movie. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bMt83_IWkE We knew this since 1974. Promising research on cancer treatment were purposefully broke down. How could we hope rational decisions with respect to climate when we tolerate brainwashing, even a sort of revisionism, on cannabis/hemp, and cancers? The problem is not stupid politicians, it is clever bandits. The prohibition of cannabis deserves truly the Nobel Prize, in Crime. But it might also be their fatal error, I think. I think the world will get closer to paradise when the humans will stop confuse p - q with q - p. That confusion is exploited by the fear sellers (pseudo-religious or not). Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ It's a load of rubbish Bruno. Cannabis ha sorry...it sorry again. It's a load of old cobblers because cannabis has been available to researchers throughout. When I read Jack Herer a long time ago, I leave the book away when I came to the chapter where he claimed that cannabis cures might cancer (and did cure some cancer for mice in 1974). I thought the hippies was going crackpot on this. That was to gross. But when in 2009 a spanish team rediscovered that fact(*), I have scrutinized both the allegation of cure, and the allegation that rserach on cannabis was discouraged. That second point is rather clear in the US where cannabis is schedule one, making research quite difficult from the administrative perspective (virtually impossible in most universities). The first point is now accepted in the mainstream, but the media and the doctors ignore it, probably because cannabis is illegal. You might read: (*) http://www.jci.org/articles/view/37948 (original spanish paper) http://www.mapinc.org/newstcl/v01/n572/a11.html You can find many papers on cannabis and cancer here:
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
Interesting, however, religion itself can an intoxicant, with the promise of paradise with many, many, willing females, and wine is permitted, and eternal life, if one merely, throws caution to wind and becomes a shaheed. What are a few years in this valley of tears, compared to paradise? An intoxicant indeed for the faithful. In Islam, consumption of intoxicants are discouraged. The arabic word used for intoxicants, in the Quran, is al-khamr. The root alphabets of the word are kh-m-r which means to cover or hide something. Intoxicants, it implies, cover the intellect, and thus are discouraged -Original Message- From: Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Sat, Apr 19, 2014 2:42 am Subject: Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate. The harmful effects of the consumption of intoxicants for the individual and its consequent effects on society are observable. The bans are in thus in the larger interest. However, if cannabis and other drugs have some medicinal benefits, then the research should continue to find the correct, beneficial use of them, as well as the side-effects. In Islam, consumption of intoxicants are discouraged. The arabic word used for intoxicants, in the Quran, is al-khamr. The root alphabets of the word are kh-m-r which means to cover or hide something. Intoxicants, it implies, cover the intellect, and thus are discouraged. It is explained: [Quran 2:219] They ask you about intoxicants and games of chance. Say: In both of them there is a great sin and means of profit for men, and their sin is greater than their profit... The word used for sin also means frustration; tiredness; laziness. Thus, I gather, both mind and body eventually suffer from the harmful effects of the intoxicant, and thus the negatives far outweigh the benefits. Initially, the believers were advised to pray when in a clear state of mind, and not when under the influence of intoxicants: : [Quran 4:43] O you who believe! do not go near prayer when you are Intoxicated until you know (well) what you say,... Gradually, they were exhorted to refrain from it altogether: [Quran 5:90] O ye who believe! Intoxicants and gambling, (dedication of) stones, and (divination by) arrows, are an abomination,- of Satan's handwork: eschew such (abomination), that ye may prosper. References: [Quran 2:219] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=2from_verse=218to_verse=220mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 [Quran 4:43] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=4from_verse=42to_verse=44mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 [Quran 5:90] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=5from_verse=89to_verse=92mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 Samiya On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 3:52 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 4/18/2014 7:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: What society thinks has nothing to do with it, because weak correlation-based scientific evidence is used selectively to create laws that were desired a priori by some interest group. That implies some nefarious motive and corrupt use of data known to be wrong. In fact there was no nefarious 'interest group' that wanted to ban marijuana or to ban alcohol or to ban heroin. All these bans were initiated by people who believed in the ill effects of these substances for individuals and for society. In many cases they had personal experience. That the bans may have given rise to criminal activities to circumvent them, isn't to the point of their origin. Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
There are many 'interesting' things to learn about Islam only if one is willing to look beyond the prejudices. The more one studies and contemplates on the Quran and the world, the more one falls in love with God. It is intoxicating, it's an amazing feeling! Samiya On 19-Apr-2014, at 6:12 pm, spudboy...@aol.com wrote: Interesting, however, religion itself can an intoxicant, with the promise of paradise with many, many, willing females, and wine is permitted, and eternal life, if one merely, throws caution to wind and becomes a shaheed. What are a few years in this valley of tears, compared to paradise? An intoxicant indeed for the faithful. In Islam, consumption of intoxicants are discouraged. The arabic word used for intoxicants, in the Quran, is al-khamr. The root alphabets of the word are kh-m-r which means to cover or hide something. Intoxicants, it implies, cover the intellect, and thus are discouraged -Original Message- From: Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Sat, Apr 19, 2014 2:42 am Subject: Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate. The harmful effects of the consumption of intoxicants for the individual and its consequent effects on society are observable. The bans are in thus in the larger interest. However, if cannabis and other drugs have some medicinal benefits, then the research should continue to find the correct, beneficial use of them, as well as the side-effects. In Islam, consumption of intoxicants are discouraged. The arabic word used for intoxicants, in the Quran, is al-khamr. The root alphabets of the word are kh-m-r which means to cover or hide something. Intoxicants, it implies, cover the intellect, and thus are discouraged. It is explained: [Quran 2:219] They ask you about intoxicants and games of chance. Say: In both of them there is a great sin and means of profit for men, and their sin is greater than their profit... The word used for sin also means frustration; tiredness; laziness. Thus, I gather, both mind and body eventually suffer from the harmful effects of the intoxicant, and thus the negatives far outweigh the benefits. Initially, the believers were advised to pray when in a clear state of mind, and not when under the influence of intoxicants: : [Quran 4:43] O you who believe! do not go near prayer when you are Intoxicated until you know (well) what you say,... Gradually, they were exhorted to refrain from it altogether: [Quran 5:90] O ye who believe! Intoxicants and gambling, (dedication of) stones, and (divination by) arrows, are an abomination,- of Satan's handwork: eschew such (abomination), that ye may prosper. References: [Quran 2:219] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=2from_verse=218to_verse=220mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 [Quran 4:43] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=4from_verse=42to_verse=44mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 [Quran 5:90] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=5from_verse=89to_verse=92mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 Samiya On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 3:52 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 4/18/2014 7:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: What society thinks has nothing to do with it, because weak correlation-based scientific evidence is used selectively to create laws that were desired a priori by some interest group. That implies some nefarious motive and corrupt use of data known to be wrong. In fact there was no nefarious 'interest group' that wanted to ban marijuana or to ban alcohol or to ban heroin. All these bans were initiated by people who believed in the ill effects of these substances for individuals and for society. In many cases they had personal experience. That the bans may have given rise to criminal activities to circumvent them, isn't to the point of their origin. Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On Friday, April 18, 2014 11:52:59 PM UTC+1, Brent wrote: On 4/18/2014 7:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: What society thinks has nothing to do with it, because weak correlation-based scientific evidence is used selectively to create laws that were desired a priori by some interest group. That implies some nefarious motive and corrupt use of data known to be wrong. In fact there was no nefarious 'interest group' that wanted to ban marijuana or to ban alcohol or to ban heroin. All these bans were initiated by people who believed in the ill effects of these substances for individuals and for society. In many cases they had personal experience. That the bans may have given rise to criminal activities to circumvent them, isn't to the point of their origin. Brent To the part about personal experience...Right - I had personal experience, like presumably a lot of people. I actually mentioned seeing two personal friends starting to smoke pot in their early teens and being institutionalized a few years later. Like...oddballs shambling up and down the street for the rest of their lives, I imagine. I wasn't looking for a violin, but the response by some people on this thread, was pretty fucking insulting. Bruno all but accused me of lying in his scare quotes experience he puts it down to. PGC blurbs out this pompous indifferent padded life twallop, and telmo jumps in with a load of projection about ghastly politically motivated people that hide behind spurious scientific veneers - and basically anything else they find useful - to continually push some twisted self-serving inconsiderate agenda. All this when there is hard scientific evidence my experience was probably well to be expectedhttp://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-07-marijuana-adolescence-permanent-brain-abnormalities.html#inlRlv. What a bunch of cunts. OK...I'm over it now. All forgiven. Big hugs :o) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
Well, I am more focused on human behavior, and what happens to humans in this world. If such a spiritual intoxication leads to an ecstatic, plunge into violence, a holy violence, then a reasoning person may pause, and ponder what is lost, what is gained, and what is the damage done? Rather than focus on the internal realm of self, I concentrate, for now, on behavior. There are many 'interesting' things to learn about Islam only if one is willing to look beyond the prejudices. The more one studies and contemplates on the Quran and the world, the more one falls in love with God. It is intoxicating, it's an amazing feeling! -Original Message- From: Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Sat, Apr 19, 2014 11:10 am Subject: Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate. There are many 'interesting' things to learn about Islam only if one is willing to look beyond the prejudices. The more one studies and contemplates on the Quran and the world, the more one falls in love with God. It is intoxicating, it's an amazing feeling! Samiya On 19-Apr-2014, at 6:12 pm, spudboy...@aol.com wrote: Interesting, however, religion itself can an intoxicant, with the promise of paradise with many, many, willing females, and wine is permitted, and eternal life, if one merely, throws caution to wind and becomes a shaheed. What are a few years in this valley of tears, compared to paradise? An intoxicant indeed for the faithful. In Islam, consumption of intoxicants are discouraged. The arabic word used for intoxicants, in the Quran, is al-khamr. The root alphabets of the word are kh-m-r which means to cover or hide something. Intoxicants, it implies, cover the intellect, and thus are discouraged -Original Message- From: Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Sat, Apr 19, 2014 2:42 am Subject: Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate. The harmful effects of the consumption of intoxicants for the individual and its consequent effects on society are observable. The bans are in thus in the larger interest. However, if cannabis and other drugs have some medicinal benefits, then the research should continue to find the correct, beneficial use of them, as well as the side-effects. In Islam, consumption of intoxicants are discouraged. The arabic word used for intoxicants, in the Quran, is al-khamr. The root alphabets of the word are kh-m-r which means to cover or hide something. Intoxicants, it implies, cover the intellect, and thus are discouraged. It is explained: [Quran 2:219] They ask you about intoxicants and games of chance. Say: In both of them there is a great sin and means of profit for men, and their sin is greater than their profit... The word used for sin also means frustration; tiredness; laziness. Thus, I gather, both mind and body eventually suffer from the harmful effects of the intoxicant, and thus the negatives far outweigh the benefits. Initially, the believers were advised to pray when in a clear state of mind, and not when under the influence of intoxicants: : [Quran 4:43] O you who believe! do not go near prayer when you are Intoxicated until you know (well) what you say,... Gradually, they were exhorted to refrain from it altogether: [Quran 5:90] O ye who believe! Intoxicants and gambling, (dedication of) stones, and (divination by) arrows, are an abomination,- of Satan's handwork: eschew such (abomination), that ye may prosper. References: [Quran 2:219] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=2from_verse=218to_verse=220mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 [Quran 4:43] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=4from_verse=42to_verse=44mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 [Quran 5:90] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=5from_verse=89to_verse=92mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 Samiya On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 3:52 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 4/18/2014 7:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: What society thinks has nothing to do with it, because weak correlation-based scientific evidence is used selectively to create laws that were desired a priori by some interest group. That implies some nefarious motive and corrupt use of data known to be wrong. In fact there was no nefarious 'interest group' that wanted to ban marijuana or to ban alcohol or to ban heroin. All these bans were initiated by people who believed in the ill effects of these substances for individuals and for society. In many cases they had personal experience. That the bans may have given
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
People do many strange and horrid things in the name of religion or nation or some other pretext. Violence has been perpetrated by the Crusaders, by the Nazis, by the Buddhists in Bhutan, by the Hindus in the Kashmir, Babri Masjid, by the Jews in Palestine, the Soviets in Afghanistan, the US and Allies in Iraq, and the list goes on... One must look beyond the people and evaluate religions for their message. Samiya spudboy100 wrote: Well, I am more focused on human behavior, and what happens to humans in this world. If such a spiritual intoxication leads to an ecstatic, plunge into violence, a holy violence, then a reasoning person may pause, and ponder what is lost, what is gained, and what is the damage done? Rather than focus on the internal realm of self, I concentrate, for now, on behavior. On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:26 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote: Well, I am more focused on human behavior, and what happens to humans in this world. If such a spiritual intoxication leads to an ecstatic, plunge into violence, a holy violence, then a reasoning person may pause, and ponder what is lost, what is gained, and what is the damage done? Rather than focus on the internal realm of self, I concentrate, for now, on behavior. There are many 'interesting' things to learn about Islam only if one is willing to look beyond the prejudices. The more one studies and contemplates on the Quran and the world, the more one falls in love with God. It is intoxicating, it's an amazing feeling! -Original Message- From: Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Sat, Apr 19, 2014 11:10 am Subject: Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate. There are many 'interesting' things to learn about Islam only if one is willing to look beyond the prejudices. The more one studies and contemplates on the Quran and the world, the more one falls in love with God. It is intoxicating, it's an amazing feeling! Samiya On 19-Apr-2014, at 6:12 pm, spudboy...@aol.com wrote: Interesting, however, religion itself can an intoxicant, with the promise of paradise with many, many, willing females, and wine is permitted, and eternal life, if one merely, throws caution to wind and becomes a shaheed. What are a few years in this valley of tears, compared to paradise? An intoxicant indeed for the faithful. In Islam, consumption of intoxicants are discouraged. The arabic word used for intoxicants, in the Quran, is al-khamr. The root alphabets of the word are kh-m-r which means to cover or hide something. Intoxicants, it implies, cover the intellect, and thus are discouraged -Original Message- From: Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Sat, Apr 19, 2014 2:42 am Subject: Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate. The harmful effects of the consumption of intoxicants for the individual and its consequent effects on society are observable. The bans are in thus in the larger interest. However, if cannabis and other drugs have some medicinal benefits, then the research should continue to find the correct, beneficial use of them, as well as the side-effects. In Islam, consumption of intoxicants are discouraged. The arabic word used for intoxicants, in the Quran, is al-khamr. The root alphabets of the word are kh-m-r which means to cover or hide something. Intoxicants, it implies, cover the intellect, and thus are discouraged. It is explained: [Quran 2:219] They ask you about intoxicants and games of chance. Say: In both of them there is a great sin and means of profit for men, and their sin is greater than their profit... The word used for sin also means frustration; tiredness; laziness. Thus, I gather, both mind and body eventually suffer from the harmful effects of the intoxicant, and thus the negatives far outweigh the benefits. Initially, the believers were advised to pray when in a clear state of mind, and not when under the influence of intoxicants: : [Quran 4:43] O you who believe! do not go near prayer when you are Intoxicated until you know (well) what you say,... Gradually, they were exhorted to refrain from it altogether: [Quran 5:90] O ye who believe! Intoxicants and gambling, (dedication of) stones, and (divination by) arrows, are an abomination,- of Satan's handwork: eschew such (abomination), that ye may prosper. References: [Quran 2:219] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=2from_verse=218to_verse=220mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 [Quran 4:43] http://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display_all.php?chapter=4from_verse=42to_verse=44mac=translation_setting=1show_yusufali=1show_shakir=1show_pickthal=1show_mkhan=1show_urdu=1 [Quran 5:90]
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On 19 Apr 2014, at 09:37, Telmo Menezes wrote: On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:52 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 4/18/2014 7:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: What society thinks has nothing to do with it, because weak correlation-based scientific evidence is used selectively to create laws that were desired a priori by some interest group. That implies some nefarious motive and corrupt use of data known to be wrong. In fact there was no nefarious 'interest group' that wanted to ban marijuana or to ban alcohol or to ban heroin. All these bans were initiated by people who believed in the ill effects of these substances for individuals and for society. In many cases they had personal experience. That the bans may have given rise to criminal activities to circumvent them, isn't to the point of their origin. I never claimed that any data was wrong. What I said was that correlations are weak evidence, It is worth than that. The danger of cannabis is a set up. It is a case where politics just ignore the real data, and the real correlation, made in the valid direction. What I say is mainstream: there are no expert on cannabis which know this, except fake expert paid by corporatist societies. The first proof by Nihas that cannabis lead to brain problems was based on rabbits brain smoking 27 (I think) cigarettes of tobacco + cannabis 24h/24h. They died of lack of oxygen. Of course all drugs have dangers, but comparatively to tobacco, alcohol, or even aspirin, sugar, etc., cannabis is less toxic, as far as we know today. The danger is a myth created by the collusion of racists (anti-mexicans), Oil barons, and drug dealers. and that many studies show correlation for all sorts of things. Furthermore, these correlations are used selectively when it comes to legislating. For this we have hard evidence: there is much stronger scientific evidence against alcohol and tobacco than cannabis, yet the former are legal while the latter is illegal. That was the lesson of prohibition of alcohol. Make a safe medication illegal, because the danger of a drug augments by prohibition, like alcohol. In the UK, Professor David Nutt was sacked from his position as chairman of the government advisory board on the misuse of drugs for analysing scientific evidence and coming to the conclusion that alcohol was more dangerous than ecstasy, LSD and cannabis: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/oct/30/drugs-adviser-david-nutt-sacked http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/oct/29/nutt-drugs-policy-reform-call?guni=Article:in%20body%20link Then, the cultivation of industrial help -- which is not psychoactive -- was also made illegal. Yes, you can find video of old people confessing having fight for the illegality of the dangerous Mexican killer drug known as marijuana, without having the slighest idea that it was hemp. It was a set up. We have all the detailed informations. Anyone taking the time can look at what happened. Industrial has a wide range of applications: paper, fabric, building material and cheap protein source, to name a few. It threatens several industries and it is not a narcotic. How do you explain that? Cannabis has been made illegal about the same day they build the first harvester machines dedicated to hemp. It was a conspiracy against Hemp. We known the name, we know the set- up, we know everything about that. We just ignore it, probably because we fear the other lies (Kennedy, and the way americans and non american get hostages of corporatism who defend special interest, and black market which finance criminals and terrorism. It is a good news, as bandits always lose power. My hope is that they will be clever enough to abandon it pacifically little bit by little bit, instead of trying to stay in power by force and violence. All lover of the free land should stand against the NDAA, as it allows break in the human rights, which I was told we were fighting for. I can understand such break for a very limited period, in war and crisis, not in any vague indeterminate way. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
RE: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
Samiya – Has Islam never participated in perpetrating violence against others; in conquest? Islam is as guilty as the other Abrahamic faiths, as an agent of violence in human history. Chris From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Samiya Illias Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 9:57 AM To: everything-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate. People do many strange and horrid things in the name of religion or nation or some other pretext. Violence has been perpetrated by the Crusaders, by the Nazis, by the Buddhists in Bhutan, by the Hindus in the Kashmir, Babri Masjid, by the Jews in Palestine, the Soviets in Afghanistan, the US and Allies in Iraq, and the list goes on... One must look beyond the people and evaluate religions for their message. Samiya spudboy100 wrote: Well, I am more focused on human behavior, and what happens to humans in this world. If such a spiritual intoxication leads to an ecstatic, plunge into violence, a holy violence, then a reasoning person may pause, and ponder what is lost, what is gained, and what is the damage done? Rather than focus on the internal realm of self, I concentrate, for now, on behavior. On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:26 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote: Well, I am more focused on human behavior, and what happens to humans in this world. If such a spiritual intoxication leads to an ecstatic, plunge into violence, a holy violence, then a reasoning person may pause, and ponder what is lost, what is gained, and what is the damage done? Rather than focus on the internal realm of self, I concentrate, for now, on behavior. There are many 'interesting' things to learn about Islam only if one is willing to look beyond the prejudices. The more one studies and contemplates on the Quran and the world, the more one falls in love with God. It is intoxicating, it's an amazing feeling! -Original Message- From: Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Sat, Apr 19, 2014 11:10 am Subject: Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate. There are many 'interesting' things to learn about Islam only if one is willing to look beyond the prejudices. The more one studies and contemplates on the Quran and the world, the more one falls in love with God. It is intoxicating, it's an amazing feeling! Samiya On 19-Apr-2014, at 6:12 pm, spudboy...@aol.com wrote: Interesting, however, religion itself can an intoxicant, with the promise of paradise with many, many, willing females, and wine is permitted, and eternal life, if one merely, throws caution to wind and becomes a shaheed. What are a few years in this valley of tears, compared to paradise? An intoxicant indeed for the faithful. In Islam, consumption of intoxicants are discouraged. The arabic word used for intoxicants, in the Quran, is al-khamr. The root alphabets of the word are kh-m-r which means to cover or hide something. Intoxicants, it implies, cover the intellect, and thus are discouraged -Original Message- From: Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Sat, Apr 19, 2014 2:42 am Subject: Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate. The harmful effects of the consumption of intoxicants for the individual and its consequent effects on society are observable. The bans are in thus in the larger interest. However, if cannabis and other drugs have some medicinal benefits, then the research should continue to find the correct, beneficial use of them, as well as the side-effects. In Islam, consumption of intoxicants are discouraged. The arabic word used for intoxicants, in the Quran, is al-khamr. The root alphabets of the word are kh-m-r which means to cover or hide something. Intoxicants, it implies, cover the intellect, and thus are discouraged. It is explained: [Quran 2:219] They ask you about intoxicants and games of chance. Say: In both of them there is a great sin and means of profit for men, and their sin is greater than their profit... The word used for sin also means frustration; tiredness; laziness. Thus, I gather, both mind and body eventually suffer from the harmful effects of the intoxicant, and thus the negatives far outweigh the benefits. Initially, the believers were advised to pray when in a clear state of mind, and not when under the influence of intoxicants: : [Quran 4:43] O you who believe! do not go near prayer when you are Intoxicated until you know (well) what you say,... Gradually, they were exhorted to refrain from it altogether: [Quran 5:90] O ye who believe! Intoxicants and gambling, (dedication of) stones, and (divination by) arrows, are an abomination,- of Satan's handwork: eschew such (abomination), that ye may prosper. References: [Quran 2:219]
RE: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of spudboy100@aol.com7 No wonder you guys are so enthusiastic about anthropogenic warming ( I concur but not like you do) cause you been rock'in the Ganj!! Y'all voted for Bob Marley for PM, and he's been off-planet for 25 years. Irae mon. Your ears hearing the skankin sounds while yer butt be feeling those spanking sounds. On the other hand in the US we elected a constitutional lawyer and head of the choom gang our president. See, the climate gets warmed up by all yer bongs. That's it. May I ask.. what are you smoking? Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On 4/19/2014 12:31 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 19 Apr 2014, at 00:52, meekerdb wrote: On 4/18/2014 7:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: What society thinks has nothing to do with it, because weak correlation-based scientific evidence is used selectively to create laws that were desired a priori by some interest group. That implies some nefarious motive and corrupt use of data known to be wrong. In fact there was no nefarious 'interest group' that wanted to ban marijuana or to ban alcohol or to ban heroin. What? For marijuana, there were a lot. Anslinger was asked to find eveidence that cannabis was worst than alcohol. he destoyed the results which showed that cannabis is much less dangerous than alcohol. Nixon, Chirac (in France), adn also people in the UK, will destroyed such records too. It is a made up since the start. That is why some people still speculate on dangers, for which there are no corresponding complains, with very few exception by person who abuse, and would probably not in case it would be legal. All these bans were initiated by people who believed in the ill effects of these substances for individuals and for society. I have no clue why you say this. Because it's true. The people may have been mistaken - particularly about the net ill effects on society - but there is plenty of evidence that some people become addicted to pot just as they become addicted to alcohol or tobacco and this has bad consequences for them. For example, my wife's first husband became a habitual pot smoker and lost all ambition and interest in other things. And even aside from such effects, there has been a strong Puritan ethic in the U.S. that thinks of any kind of sybaritic pleasure as sinful and bad for one's character. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
RE: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Telmo Menezes Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 12:38 AM To: everything-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate. On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:52 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 4/18/2014 7:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: What society thinks has nothing to do with it, because weak correlation-based scientific evidence is used selectively to create laws that were desired a priori by some interest group. That implies some nefarious motive and corrupt use of data known to be wrong. In fact there was no nefarious 'interest group' that wanted to ban marijuana or to ban alcohol or to ban heroin. All these bans were initiated by people who believed in the ill effects of these substances for individuals and for society. In many cases they had personal experience. That the bans may have given rise to criminal activities to circumvent them, isn't to the point of their origin. I never claimed that any data was wrong. What I said was that correlations are weak evidence, and that many studies show correlation for all sorts of things. Furthermore, these correlations are used selectively when it comes to legislating. For this we have hard evidence: there is much stronger scientific evidence against alcohol and tobacco than cannabis, yet the former are legal while the latter is illegal. Exactly - weak correlations can be found for almost anything if you look hard enough. Chris In the UK, Professor David Nutt was sacked from his position as chairman of the government advisory board on the misuse of drugs for analysing scientific evidence and coming to the conclusion that alcohol was more dangerous than ecstasy, LSD and cannabis: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/oct/30/drugs-adviser-david-nutt-sac ked http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/oct/29/nutt-drugs-policy-reform-cal l?guni=Article:in%20body%20link Then, the cultivation of industrial help -- which is not psychoactive -- was also made illegal. Industrial has a wide range of applications: paper, fabric, building material and cheap protein source, to name a few. It threatens several industries and it is not a narcotic. How do you explain that? Telmo. Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On 4/19/2014 12:37 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: Then, the cultivation of industrial help -- which is not psychoactive -- was also made illegal. Industrial has a wide range of applications: paper, fabric, building material and cheap protein source, to name a few. It threatens several industries and it is not a narcotic. How do you explain that? How do you explain that growth of industrial hemp was encouraged by the government up through World War 2? Did it not pose the same threats then? Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On 4/19/2014 1:15 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 19 Apr 2014, at 08:42, Samiya Illias wrote: The harmful effects of the consumption of intoxicants for the individual and its consequent effects on society are observable. The bans are in thus in the larger interest. This does not follow. Banning intoxicant augments the intoxicant consumption, and so, if that is bad, it leads to the contrary effect than the one desired. Even if it suppresses the consumption of something that is bad for you (e.g. tobacco smoking) the actions necessary for suppression: searches, police surveillance, fines, imprisonment - may be worse than the effects of consumption. Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
RE: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of meekerdb On 4/19/2014 1:15 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 19 Apr 2014, at 08:42, Samiya Illias wrote: The harmful effects of the consumption of intoxicants for the individual and its consequent effects on society are observable. The bans are in thus in the larger interest. This does not follow. Banning intoxicant augments the intoxicant consumption, and so, if that is bad, it leads to the contrary effect than the one desired. Even if it suppresses the consumption of something that is bad for you (e.g. tobacco smoking) the actions necessary for suppression: searches, police surveillance, fines, imprisonment - may be worse than the effects of consumption. Besides which - if left alone - the effects of something that is bad for you ultimately result in bad outcomes for the individuals with the bad habits. Over time cultures begin to recognize the correlation between some habit and bad outcomes and a natural balance is achieved without state intervention. For example - to use a non drug behavior - the practice of safe sex (i.e. using a condom) has markedly reduced the transmission rates of many deadly diseases, such as hiv, amongst sexually active populations. This cultural behavioral change - from not using condoms to using condoms, has not been achieved through state enforcement (also highly impractical perhaps), but through the spread of the awareness and consequent cultural adaptation. It is legal in many places - Italy for example - for hard alcohol to be sold to a four year old, but it does not happen in practice - all without the need for the repressive enforcement of any laws, regulations, but rather through the more benign method of custom and basic common sense. It is through learned cultural adaptation that most things can and should be handled. State intervention should be reserved for acute types of acts, such as say murder, or massive toxic pollution that are intolerable for general well-being. The need to make laws, to prohibit (also religiously-politically, in say how Islam prohibits - by force -- the consumption of pork or alcohol) against perceived moral or behavioral wrongs is ultimately a grand waste of energy and a powerful enabler of organized criminality and widespread corruption that achieves nothing except driving certain proscribed behaviors underground into the shadow world of the organized crime syndicate central intelligence agency dominated black world. the world that effectively rules - or at the very least powerfully influences -- the visible official world that is publicly represented as being the entire story. There is no need for the cure; the cure is worse than the disease because dangerous behavior self corrects in that those who engage in it are removed from the gene pool and provide teachable moments to other individuals who witness their trajectories. As amongst mountain climbers it is well known that there are no old free climbers.. Because they die young! By a similar parallel kind of mechanism the ultimate trajectories that various drug habits (or any habit for that matter: gambling say, or over-eating, bad diet, or lack of exercise. etc.) lead people's lives on becomes part of our cultural repertoire, without the need for any state intervention. Junkies, like free climbers (who climb rock faces without pitons or rope) also tend to die young. There will always be some individuals who are drawn into these habits or pursuits, but the percentages will always be small because the vast majority of people can draw on their cultural knowledge and wisely avoid these habits or risk intense pursuits. Why not just let Darwinian evolution do its job? Culture should attempt to educate and encourage, and offer means of rehabilitation for junkies and alcoholics, and for a host of other impulse driven bad behavior. I very much support that, but I see - as the evidence from the fifty plus failed example of the drug war proves - that state repression is not an answer. Rather it is the profit engine of the global crime syndicates whose immense profits over time corrupt all institutions in society (the stock exchanges, the banks, the legal system itself) and whose black world intersects in a perverse and corrupting manner with the world of state central intelligence agencies (which also operate largely outside the law, and which do business with the crime syndicates) Chris Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On 19 Apr 2014, at 12:35, Samiya Illias wrote: On 19-Apr-2014, at 1:15 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote: On 19 Apr 2014, at 08:42, Samiya Illias wrote: The harmful effects of the consumption of intoxicants for the individual and its consequent effects on society are observable. The bans are in thus in the larger interest. This does not follow. Banning intoxicant augments the intoxicant consumption, and so, if that is bad, it leads to the contrary effect than the one desired. Agree to disagree :) Even when a turkish sultana condemned smoking tobacco by having the head off, the consumption of tobacco grew. Now, when a religion is related to the state, some religious prohibition might work, but I was thinking to laic multi-confessional countries. However, if cannabis and other drugs have some medicinal benefits, then the research should continue to find the correct, beneficial use of them, as well as the side-effects. Sure. In Islam, consumption of intoxicants are discouraged. The arabic word used for intoxicants, in the Quran, is al-khamr. The root alphabets of the word are kh-m-r which means to cover or hide something. Intoxicants, it implies, cover the intellect, and thus are discouraged. Does it? The Sufi thinks differently (as you know and can see by searching sufi drug use. For them, some psychotropic does not cover the intellect, but discover it. I am aware of the Sufi branch and thought. However, I am only quoting the Quran, the original Arabic text, which all sects agree upon as the Book revealed to Prophet Muhammad, which has not undergone any change, and is preserved in written form as well as in the memory of millions of human beings till this day. The muslims I know disagree on many verses. I am not sure such text are easy to interpret. Even arithmetic is not that easy to interpret. If something is intoxicating the mind, then how can it be considered safe to 'discover the intellect' unless the intellect has not yet been discovered? ;) It can be a reminiscence :) In that case, in the absence of an active intellect, can such a person be expected to making a rational decision of choosing whether or not to 'use the drug'?? The decision has to be done before taking the drug. Yes, there is always a risk, and nobody should push you, and that is another reason to make it legal, at least in laïc countries. To avoid unscrupulous street dealers pushing weak people to buy rotten psychotropic. (and to avoid legal drug dealer not trying to cure you). It is explained: [Quran 2:219] They ask you about intoxicants and games of chance. Say: In both of them there is a great sin and means of profit for men, and their sin is greater than their profit... That is an authoritative argument. You must understand that this is not a good point for the Quran, or that interpretation of the Quran. How can *you* be sure if the prophet did not misunderstood God? The original Arabic words of the Quran have not suffered any change over the centuries. That might not necessarily be a good sign. They are not the words of the Prophet. He was only the messenger, transmitting the revelation as received. Asserting this might not add sense to me. I respect your belief, but I will be vigilant about you respecting possible other beliefs. Have you come across any human book which has about 6236 sentences, and millions of people know it by heart completely, from beginning till end? You are not reassuring me, here. This original manuscript is protected from human interpretation... My question is: what if a young person tells you, I don't want to study by heart the Quran, I want to study by heart the Bhagavad-Gita? Will that person keep a decent life in your neighborhood? Saudi arabis just decided to make atheism illegal. Do we agree that this should not be tolerated? I am not an atheist, but I consider that each human can think for himself, as long as it does not impose its idea by dishonest means or violence, threat, etc. The word used for sin also means frustration; tiredness; laziness. Thus, I gather, both mind and body eventually suffer from the harmful effects of the intoxicant, and thus the negatives far outweigh the benefits. Initially, the believers were advised to pray when in a clear state of mind, and not when under the influence of intoxicants: : [Quran 4:43] O you who believe! do not go near prayer when you are Intoxicated until you know (well) what you say,... Gradually, they were exhorted to refrain from it altogether: [Quran 5:90] O ye who believe! Intoxicants and gambling, (dedication of) stones, and (divination by) arrows, are an abomination,- of Satan's handwork: eschew such (abomination), that ye may prosper. References: [Quran 2:219]
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On 4/19/2014 8:17 AM, Samiya Illias wrote: There are many 'interesting' things to learn about Islam only if one is willing to look beyond the prejudices. The more one studies and contemplates on the Quran and the world, the more one falls in love with God. It is intoxicating, it's an amazing feeling! More proof of the danger of drugs. Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On 20 April 2014 09:46, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 4/19/2014 8:17 AM, Samiya Illias wrote: There are many 'interesting' things to learn about Islam only if one is willing to look beyond the prejudices. The more one studies and contemplates on the Quran and the world, the more one falls in love with God. It is intoxicating, it's an amazing feeling! More proof of the danger of drugs. Or of falling in love. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On 4/19/2014 4:25 PM, LizR wrote: On 20 April 2014 09:46, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 4/19/2014 8:17 AM, Samiya Illias wrote: There are many 'interesting' things to learn about Islam only if one is willing to look beyond the prejudices. The more one studies and contemplates on the Quran and the world, the more one falls in love with God. It is intoxicating, it's an amazing feeling! More proof of the danger of drugs. Or of falling in love. Yep. Never fall in love with a jealous despot. Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
All substances are poisons; there is none which is not a poison. The right dose differentiates a poison…. Paracelsus (1493-1541) Paracelsus did a fair job with those few words. Indeed love, theology, belief, water, books, and a large variety of concepts and behaviors could qualify as substance here. What isn't poisonous or would disqualify the statement? PGC On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 2:07 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 4/19/2014 4:25 PM, LizR wrote: On 20 April 2014 09:46, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 4/19/2014 8:17 AM, Samiya Illias wrote: There are many 'interesting' things to learn about Islam only if one is willing to look beyond the prejudices. The more one studies and contemplates on the Quran and the world, the more one falls in love with God. It is intoxicating, it's an amazing feeling! More proof of the danger of drugs. Or of falling in love. Yep. Never fall in love with a jealous despot. Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
I agree. (Even chocolate may be a poison, although I haven't yet completed my investigations.) On 20 April 2014 12:55, Platonist Guitar Cowboy multiplecit...@gmail.comwrote: All substances are poisons; there is none which is not a poison. The right dose differentiates a poison…. Paracelsus (1493-1541) Paracelsus did a fair job with those few words. Indeed love, theology, belief, water, books, and a large variety of concepts and behaviors could qualify as substance here. What isn't poisonous or would disqualify the statement? PGC On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 2:07 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 4/19/2014 4:25 PM, LizR wrote: On 20 April 2014 09:46, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 4/19/2014 8:17 AM, Samiya Illias wrote: There are many 'interesting' things to learn about Islam only if one is willing to look beyond the prejudices. The more one studies and contemplates on the Quran and the world, the more one falls in love with God. It is intoxicating, it's an amazing feeling! More proof of the danger of drugs. Or of falling in love. Yep. Never fall in love with a jealous despot. Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
Chris, I was replying to Spudboy100 who refuses to consider the Quran because of the 'jihadis' 'behavoir' . The point I was trying to make is that some people, from all religious persuasions, do strange and at times horrible things. We need to look past people and their behaviours, and examine the religious texts to evaluate for ourselves what it is. We are all responsible for our own beliefs and actions. We come to this world alone, we will leave it alone. What religious label we are born in, which religious label or not we choose, eventually we all must face death alone, and whatever's beyond that. Wishing it away because some people are poor ambassadors or poor communicators of the message, won't change things according to our wishes. We humans have intelligence and a vast wondrous world full of thoughts and ideas and science and signs... we must explore everything we can for its own merit before discarding it. On this Everything list, I see earnest seekers exploring almost everything, but somehow they stop short of scripture, especially Quran. I understand much of this has to do with a filtered view of history, long-held prejudices, popular media, as well as the actions of people who poorly understand or use the religion, etc. The thing is, to understand everything, we must be willing to explore everything. To answer your question, you may find these versions of history different from what you may know about Muslim conquests: http://lostislamichistory.com/did-islam-spread-by-the-sword/ http://lostislamichistory.com/?s=crusades http://lostislamichistory.com/the-crusades-part-3-liberation/ Samiya On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.comwrote: Samiya – Has Islam never participated in perpetrating violence against others; in conquest? Islam is as guilty as the other Abrahamic faiths, as an agent of violence in human history. Chris *From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto: everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Samiya Illias *Sent:* Saturday, April 19, 2014 9:57 AM *To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate. People do many strange and horrid things in the name of religion or nation or some other pretext. Violence has been perpetrated by the Crusaders, by the Nazis, by the Buddhists in Bhutan, by the Hindus in the Kashmir, Babri Masjid, by the Jews in Palestine, the Soviets in Afghanistan, the US and Allies in Iraq, and the list goes on... One must look beyond the people and evaluate religions for their message. Samiya spudboy100 wrote: Well, I am more focused on human behavior, and what happens to humans in this world. If such a spiritual intoxication leads to an ecstatic, plunge into violence, a holy violence, then a reasoning person may pause, and ponder what is lost, what is gained, and what is the damage done? Rather than focus on the internal realm of self, I concentrate, for now, on behavior. On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:26 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote: Well, I am more focused on human behavior, and what happens to humans in this world. If such a spiritual intoxication leads to an ecstatic, plunge into violence, a holy violence, then a reasoning person may pause, and ponder what is lost, what is gained, and what is the damage done? Rather than focus on the internal realm of self, I concentrate, for now, on behavior. There are many 'interesting' things to learn about Islam only if one is willing to look beyond the prejudices. The more one studies and contemplates on the Quran and the world, the more one falls in love with God. It is intoxicating, it's an amazing feeling! -Original Message- From: Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Sat, Apr 19, 2014 11:10 am Subject: Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate. There are many 'interesting' things to learn about Islam only if one is willing to look beyond the prejudices. The more one studies and contemplates on the Quran and the world, the more one falls in love with God. It is intoxicating, it's an amazing feeling! Samiya On 19-Apr-2014, at 6:12 pm, spudboy...@aol.com wrote: Interesting, however, religion itself can an intoxicant, with the promise of paradise with many, many, willing females, and wine is permitted, and eternal life, if one merely, throws caution to wind and becomes a shaheed. What are a few years in this valley of tears, compared to paradise? An intoxicant indeed for the faithful. In Islam, consumption of intoxicants are discouraged. The arabic word used for intoxicants, in the Quran, is al-khamr. The root alphabets of the word are kh-m-r which means to cover or hide something. Intoxicants, it implies, cover the intellect, and thus are discouraged -Original Message- From: Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com To: everything-list
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On 20 April 2014 15:15, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote: Chris, I was replying to Spudboy100 who refuses to consider the Quran because of the 'jihadis' 'behavoir' . The point I was trying to make is that some people, from all religious persuasions, do strange and at times horrible things. We need to look past people and their behaviours, and examine the religious texts to evaluate for ourselves what it is. We are all responsible for our own beliefs and actions. We come to this world alone, we will leave it alone. What religious label we are born in, which religious label or not we choose, eventually we all must face death alone, and whatever's beyond that. Wishing it away because some people are poor ambassadors or poor communicators of the message, won't change things according to our wishes. We humans have intelligence and a vast wondrous world full of thoughts and ideas and science and signs... we must explore everything we can for its own merit before discarding it. On this Everything list, I see earnest seekers exploring almost everything, but somehow they stop short of scripture, especially Quran. I understand much of this has to do with a filtered view of history, long-held prejudices, popular media, as well as the actions of people who poorly understand or use the religion, etc. This is, at least in my case, due to a distrust of taking the authority of centuries-old texts when there is little to no evidence that any of them contain more than - at best - a slight grain of truth, and when from a present day perspective it is clear they were created for reasons well understood by psychologists (in particular, for social control). The thing is, to understand everything, we must be willing to explore everything. Including Uri Geller, UFOs, a thousand people who want to prove Einstein wrong, Borley Rectory, the people trying to sell me something from Nigeria, the Loch Ness monster, Ouija boards, Thor, Zeus, Odin and so on - yes, no doubt one shouldn't dismiss anything, but life's too short not to prioritise. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote: On 19 Apr 2014, at 12:35, Samiya Illias wrote: On 19-Apr-2014, at 1:15 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote: On 19 Apr 2014, at 08:42, Samiya Illias wrote: The harmful effects of the consumption of intoxicants for the individual and its consequent effects on society are observable. The bans are in thus in the larger interest. This does not follow. Banning intoxicant augments the intoxicant consumption, and so, if that is bad, it leads to the contrary effect than the one desired. Agree to disagree :) Even when a turkish sultana condemned smoking tobacco by having the head off, the consumption of tobacco grew. Now, when a religion is related to the state, some religious prohibition might work, but I was thinking to laic multi-confessional countries. However, if cannabis and other drugs have some medicinal benefits, then the research should continue to find the correct, beneficial use of them, as well as the side-effects. Sure. In Islam, consumption of intoxicants are discouraged. The arabic word used for intoxicants, in the Quran, is al-khamr. The root alphabets of the word are kh-m-r which means to cover or hide something. Intoxicants, it implies, cover the intellect, and thus are discouraged. Does it? The Sufi thinks differently (as you know and can see by searching sufi drug use. For them, some psychotropic does not cover the intellect, but discover it. I am aware of the Sufi branch and thought. However, I am only quoting the Quran, the original Arabic text, which all sects agree upon as the Book revealed to Prophet Muhammad, which has not undergone any change, and is preserved in written form as well as in the memory of millions of human beings till this day. The muslims I know disagree on many verses. I am not sure such text are easy to interpret. Even arithmetic is not that easy to interpret. Yet you work with arithmetic, explore comp and try to understand :) If something is intoxicating the mind, then how can it be considered safe to 'discover the intellect' unless the intellect has not yet been discovered? ;) It can be a reminiscence :) In that case, in the absence of an active intellect, can such a person be expected to making a rational decision of choosing whether or not to 'use the drug'?? The decision has to be done before taking the drug. Yes, there is always a risk, and nobody should push you, and that is another reason to make it legal, at least in laïc countries. To avoid unscrupulous street dealers pushing weak people to buy rotten psychotropic. (and to avoid legal drug dealer not trying to cure you). It is explained: [Quran 2:219] They ask you about intoxicants and games of chance. Say: In both of them there is a great sin and means of profit for men, and their sin is greater than their profit... That is an authoritative argument. You must understand that this is not a good point for the Quran, or that interpretation of the Quran. How can *you* be sure if the prophet did not misunderstood God? The original Arabic words of the Quran have not suffered any change over the centuries. That might not necessarily be a good sign. What do you mean? They are not the words of the Prophet. He was only the messenger, transmitting the revelation as received. Asserting this might not add sense to me. I respect your belief, but I will be vigilant about you respecting possible other beliefs. Fair enough Have you come across any human book which has about 6236 sentences, and millions of people know it by heart completely, from beginning till end? You are not reassuring me, here. Just pointing out a unique miracle that I know not of any other book. I do not understand your comment. This original manuscript is protected from human interpretation... My question is: what if a young person tells you, I don't want to study by heart the Quran, I want to study by heart the Bhagavad-Gita? Will that person keep a decent life in your neighborhood? The question is besides the point: can the Bhagavad-Gita or any other book be memorized by heart, from beginning till end, word by word, in the original language? Do millions of people already know it by heart, so that the authenticity of the original text can be verified by cross-checking various sources? There are many decent people on all communities and societies who have different sets of beliefs and religions, as well as different sects within the same religion. I have Hindu and Christian neighbours, and that's fine. Saudi arabis just decided to make atheism illegal. Do we agree that this should not be tolerated? I am not an atheist, but I consider that each human can think for himself, as long as it does not impose its idea by dishonest means or violence, threat, etc. The word used for sin also means frustration; tiredness;
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 8:34 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 April 2014 15:15, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote: Chris, I was replying to Spudboy100 who refuses to consider the Quran because of the 'jihadis' 'behavoir' . The point I was trying to make is that some people, from all religious persuasions, do strange and at times horrible things. We need to look past people and their behaviours, and examine the religious texts to evaluate for ourselves what it is. We are all responsible for our own beliefs and actions. We come to this world alone, we will leave it alone. What religious label we are born in, which religious label or not we choose, eventually we all must face death alone, and whatever's beyond that. Wishing it away because some people are poor ambassadors or poor communicators of the message, won't change things according to our wishes. We humans have intelligence and a vast wondrous world full of thoughts and ideas and science and signs... we must explore everything we can for its own merit before discarding it. On this Everything list, I see earnest seekers exploring almost everything, but somehow they stop short of scripture, especially Quran. I understand much of this has to do with a filtered view of history, long-held prejudices, popular media, as well as the actions of people who poorly understand or use the religion, etc. This is, at least in my case, due to a distrust of taking the authority of centuries-old texts when there is little to no evidence that any of them contain more than - at best - a slight grain of truth, and when from a present day perspective it is clear they were created for reasons well understood by psychologists (in particular, for social control). The thing is, to understand everything, we must be willing to explore everything. Including Uri Geller, UFOs, a thousand people who want to prove Einstein wrong, Borley Rectory, the people trying to sell me something from Nigeria, the Loch Ness monster, Ouija boards, Thor, Zeus, Odin and so on - yes, no doubt one shouldn't dismiss anything, but life's too short not to prioritise. Too short, yes! Prioritize, yes! Especially because if there is a purpose to this life, and especially if there is more to life after death, and if this short life is but a test, whose result is eternal, then we better study earnestly. Difficult, yes, impossible, no! Samiya -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On 20 April 2014 16:01, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 8:34 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 April 2014 15:15, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote: Chris, I was replying to Spudboy100 who refuses to consider the Quran because of the 'jihadis' 'behavoir' . The point I was trying to make is that some people, from all religious persuasions, do strange and at times horrible things. We need to look past people and their behaviours, and examine the religious texts to evaluate for ourselves what it is. We are all responsible for our own beliefs and actions. We come to this world alone, we will leave it alone. What religious label we are born in, which religious label or not we choose, eventually we all must face death alone, and whatever's beyond that. Wishing it away because some people are poor ambassadors or poor communicators of the message, won't change things according to our wishes. We humans have intelligence and a vast wondrous world full of thoughts and ideas and science and signs... we must explore everything we can for its own merit before discarding it. On this Everything list, I see earnest seekers exploring almost everything, but somehow they stop short of scripture, especially Quran. I understand much of this has to do with a filtered view of history, long-held prejudices, popular media, as well as the actions of people who poorly understand or use the religion, etc. This is, at least in my case, due to a distrust of taking the authority of centuries-old texts when there is little to no evidence that any of them contain more than - at best - a slight grain of truth, and when from a present day perspective it is clear they were created for reasons well understood by psychologists (in particular, for social control). The thing is, to understand everything, we must be willing to explore everything. Including Uri Geller, UFOs, a thousand people who want to prove Einstein wrong, Borley Rectory, the people trying to sell me something from Nigeria, the Loch Ness monster, Ouija boards, Thor, Zeus, Odin and so on - yes, no doubt one shouldn't dismiss anything, but life's too short not to prioritise. Too short, yes! Prioritize, yes! Especially because if there is a purpose to this life, and especially if there is more to life after death, and if this short life is but a test, whose result is eternal, then we better study earnestly. Difficult, yes, impossible, no! Hmm. Pascal's wager, no less. So which of the 1000s of Gods people have invented, I mean discovered through divine revelation, should one bet on (and why) ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On 4/19/2014 9:01 PM, Samiya Illias wrote: Including Uri Geller, UFOs, a thousand people who want to prove Einstein wrong, Borley Rectory, the people trying to sell me something from Nigeria, the Loch Ness monster, Ouija boards, Thor, Zeus, Odin and so on - yes, no doubt one shouldn't dismiss anything, but life's too short not to prioritise. Too short, yes! Prioritize, yes! Especially because if there is a purpose to this life, and especially if there is more to life after death, and if this short life is but a test, whose result is eternal, then we better study earnestly. Difficult, yes, impossible, no! It's an incredible con job when you think of it, to believe something now in exchange for life after death. Even corporations with all their reward systems don't try to make it posthumous. Gloria Steinem, women's rights activist -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion. -- Steven Weinberg On 20 April 2014 16:54, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 4/19/2014 9:01 PM, Samiya Illias wrote: Including Uri Geller, UFOs, a thousand people who want to prove Einstein wrong, Borley Rectory, the people trying to sell me something from Nigeria, the Loch Ness monster, Ouija boards, Thor, Zeus, Odin and so on - yes, no doubt one shouldn't dismiss anything, but life's too short not to prioritise. Too short, yes! Prioritize, yes! Especially because if there is a purpose to this life, and especially if there is more to life after death, and if this short life is but a test, whose result is eternal, then we better study earnestly. Difficult, yes, impossible, no! It's an incredible con job when you think of it, to believe something now in exchange for life after death. Even corporations with all their reward systems don't try to make it posthumous. Gloria Steinem, women's rights activist -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.