Re: What over 170 people think about machines that think

2015-02-02 Thread Jason Resch
Descartes, who first defined mechanism, believed that all animal and human behavior (with the exception of thought) could be explained via mechanism. Despite living in the 1600s, he was even able to imagine that synthesized speech could be invented. However, one thing he could not imagine any

Fwd: [CharlottePsWeb] Fwd: February Newsletter

2015-02-02 Thread meekerdb
Good article. Brent Forwarded Message Religion’s smart-people problem: The shaky intellectual foundations of absolute faith Religious belief the world over has a strenuous relationship with intellectualism. But why? John G. Messerly

Re: What over 170 people think about machines that think

2015-02-02 Thread LizR
All forms of consciousness involve a great amount of intelligence relative to, say, the state of being a rock - e.g. an owl recognising a fieldmouse from a mile away involves a lot of clever processing that might tax an advanced computer programme, although I'm sure we can do something similar

Re: What over 170 people think about machines that think

2015-02-02 Thread meekerdb
On 2/2/2015 9:44 AM, John Clark wrote: On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:21 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote: EVERYBODY know how to test for consciousness, intelligence behavior is the test, and and without exception every person on this list has

Re: Free Speech is not Free unless it is allowed for every point of view

2015-02-02 Thread LizR
On 3 February 2015 at 12:18, spudboy100 via Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote: Liz, this is only for the brainwashed, the ideological. You need to ask him why he makes justification for ISIS? For Iran, for Al Qaeda. My guess is that its ideological. If you like Eric

Re: Free Speech is not Free unless it is allowed for every point of view

2015-02-02 Thread spudboy100 via Everything List
Liz, this is only for the brainwashed, the ideological. You need to ask him why he makes justification for ISIS? For Iran, for Al Qaeda. My guess is that its ideological. If you like Eric Blair/Orwell, Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. In a time of universal

Re: NUMERALS

2015-02-02 Thread Bruce Kellett
LizR wrote: I think English, French, German all start composite numbers around 13? (Maybe a Christian influence?) I'm not sure you can deduce base 2 from half-eyed etc. And I imagine 5 was given a different design because it makes a full hand, so to speak. I imagine types of music that evolved

Re: Free Speech is not Free unless it is allowed for every point of view

2015-02-02 Thread LizR
I agree with that definition of freedom, which is in the same spirit as between consenting adults in a related sphere. And the law, in a democracy, is an attempt to codify that (although it frequently gets hijacked into moral crusades etc). The problem,even assuming honest people trying to

NUMERALS

2015-02-02 Thread John Mikes
FRIENDS - MAINLY BRUNO (it all came out from the French numbers). any thoughts why some numerals have specific names, others use composites? Example: (Fr:) onze, ...seize yet dixset etc. German elf, zwoelf yet dreizehen... same in English, Hungarian has composites above 10, Russian Italian etc.

Re: Free Speech is not Free unless it is allowed for every point of view

2015-02-02 Thread John Mikes
Liz, while you are in the mood... I have a good maxim for freedom (don't claim absolute inventorship): when you are 'free' to do anything without infringing into the freedom of others. (Under the commis we formulated it differently: freedom means to feel free to do anything that had been allowed

Re: Free Speech is not Free unless it is allowed for every point of view

2015-02-02 Thread spudboy100 via Everything List
Agreed so far. I tend towards libertarian small scale solutions and never trusted 43, nor his competence, nor, the people he chiefly, represented. BHO is much much worse, in both incompetence and lies. The man's policies fail, one by one, and thus, will cause troubles not only to his home

Re: Free Speech is not Free unless it is allowed for every point of view

2015-02-02 Thread LizR
On 3 February 2015 at 13:25, spudboy100 via Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote: Agreed so far. I tend towards libertarian small scale solutions and never trusted 43, nor his competence, nor, the people he chiefly, represented. BHO is much much worse, in both incompetence

Re: What over 170 people think about machines that think

2015-02-02 Thread meekerdb
On 2/2/2015 8:26 PM, John Clark wrote: On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:50 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote: I believe you're wrong to assume intelligence=consciousness. That may be an accident If consciousness was just a lucky accident Evolution would

Re: Why is there something rather than nothing? From quantum theory to dialectics?

2015-02-02 Thread Samiya Illias
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote: On 02 Feb 2015, at 06:37, Samiya Illias wrote: On 02-Feb-2015, at 6:12 am, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote: On 2 February 2015 at 00:15, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:01 PM,

Re: What over 170 people think about machines that think

2015-02-02 Thread meekerdb
On 2/2/2015 8:37 PM, Jason Resch wrote: You can no more assume those other parts of your brain are unconscious than you can assume other beings lack consciousness. You might even have solved it consciously but are amnesiac about it. Poincare's unconscious was pretty smart, it could prove

Re: What over 170 people think about machines that think

2015-02-02 Thread Jason Resch
What are your thoughts on split brains which develop two independently conscious minds? We're they always two minds, or do they become such when they can't communicate? Jason On Monday, February 2, 2015, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 2/2/2015 8:37 PM, Jason Resch wrote: You can no

Re: What over 170 people think about machines that think

2015-02-02 Thread Jason Resch
You can no more assume those other parts of your brain are unconscious than you can assume other beings lack consciousness. You might even have solved it consciously but are amnesiac about it. Jason On Monday, February 2, 2015, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote: All forms of consciousness involve a

Re: What over 170 people think about machines that think

2015-02-02 Thread meekerdb
I think conscious is ambiguous. From what I've read the two halves of the split brain are not both conscious in the sense of having an internal narrative; only one half is verbal. Both halves are conscious in the sense of processing information and influencing action - as my dog is conscious

Re: What over 170 people think about machines that think

2015-02-02 Thread John Clark
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:50 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: I believe you're wrong to assume intelligence=consciousness. That may be an accident If consciousness was just a lucky accident Evolution would ensure that it didn't exist for long. Conscious does not effect behavior

Re: What over 170 people think about machines that think

2015-02-02 Thread LizR
Sounds like you're a bit left hemispherist. On 3 February 2015 at 19:01, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: I think conscious is ambiguous. From what I've read the two halves of the split brain are not both conscious in the sense of having an internal narrative; only one half is verbal.

Re: What over 170 people think about machines that think

2015-02-02 Thread John Clark
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:21 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: EVERYBODY know how to test for consciousness, intelligence behavior is the test, and and without exception every person on this list has used that test at least once every single day of their lives. No that's not how

Re: Why is there something rather than nothing? From quantum theory to dialectics?

2015-02-02 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 02 Feb 2015, at 06:37, Samiya Illias wrote: On 02-Feb-2015, at 6:12 am, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote: On 2 February 2015 at 00:15, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:01 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote: There is a difference between advancing a