Liz states that "Special relativity shows that there is no such thing as a
"common present moment". but this is incorrect.
Actually special relativity shows exactly the opposite. In my book I
explain how this works. It is well known, though little understood, that
everything without exception c
they just count up
to 17.
Edgar
On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 7:48:24 AM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Both Roger and Bruno took issue with my definition of reality to include
> theories about reality. But the proper definition of reality is that
> reality in
is single
universal computational reality in their respective frames as they emerge
from quantum events.
Best,
Edgar
On Friday, December 20, 2013 6:52:54 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>
> All,
>
> The fundamental nature of reality is examined in detail in my recent book
> on Realit
...
Edgar
On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 7:48:24 AM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Both Roger and Bruno took issue with my definition of reality to include
> theories about reality. But the proper definition of reality is that
> reality includes everything that exists
and no matter how much you try it still runs. Reality
keeps running in spite of your human math telling you it can't run.
*Eppur si muove!*
Edgar
On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 7:48:24 AM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Both Roger and Bruno took issue with
ch
conveys actual reality upon the computationally evolving information forms
within it. Because of its non-physical nature OE is difficult to properly
describe as Lao Tse noted about the Tao which was his take on OE.
Edgar
On Monday, December 23, 2013 1:48:40 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>
ngs are their information only, but that information is wonderful
indeed!
Edgar
On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 7:48:24 AM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Both Roger and Bruno took issue with my definition of reality to include
> theories about reality. But the proper definition
x27;t
shown any such contradiction.
Again the entirety of reality MUST be computational, otherwise it could
never even happen as there is no way for something to happen other than it
being computed.
Edgar
On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 7:48:24 AM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>
> All,
&g
ecember 24, 2013 7:48:24 AM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Both Roger and Bruno took issue with my definition of reality to include
> theories about reality. But the proper definition of reality is that
> reality includes everything that exists and theories of reality mo
is tight, exact and meaningful. One doesn't need to know
everything about reality to define it meaningfully as everything that
exists. Thus defining God as Reality is well defined and meaningful. It's
the only rational choice IF you need a God.
Edgar
On Monday, December 23, 2013
formatting specs is neither science nor reason, its just stating an opinion
with no supporting evidence.
Edgar
On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 7:48:24 AM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Both Roger and Bruno took issue with my definition of reality to include
> theories about
you would disagree with it!
Edgar
On Monday, December 23, 2013 1:48:40 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>
> All,
>
> The question of whether God exists is meaningless without first giving
> some definition of what is meant by God, of how God is defined. Otherwise
> everyone is ta
All,
Both Roger and Bruno took issue with my definition of reality to include
theories about reality. But the proper definition of reality is that
reality includes everything that exists and theories of reality most
certainly exist. Roger and Bruno seem to be coming from the old dualistic
defi
Thanks for purchasing it. Note that in the Kindle edition the Title page
and table of contents formatting is a little screwed up but the text seems
OK.
Edgar
On Monday, December 23, 2013 7:15:13 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Someone asked somewhere if I cover quant
All,
Someone asked somewhere if I cover quantum theory in my book. Yes, I do.
The entire 'Part III: Elementals' of the book covers reality at its finest
scale, the quantum world. I'll summarize here but can only gloss over some
of the main points.
As stated before reality, at its most fund
ld be
horribly dumb for Google not to let me sign up with whatever email I wanted!
Thanks,
Edgar
On Monday, December 23, 2013 2:09:10 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>
> I've set option of getting all posts as emails which seems to be working
> OK I think. But when I reply to a post
Stephen,
A very important point which I cover extensively in my book, but rather
subtle to grasp.
Reality clearly exists. There is something really here now and actual and
happening. The totality of that is defined as reality and I refer to its
'stuff' (non-physical but real and actual) as an
ember 20, 2013 6:52:54 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>
> All,
>
> The fundamental nature of reality is examined in detail in my recent book
> on Reality available on Amazon under my name.
>
> Marchal is on the right track, but reality consists not just of numbers
> (math
content according to his own nature.
I can explain further if anyone is interested, or you can read my book
which covers Mind and Reality and explains what Consciousness is quite
thoroughly.
Edgar
On Friday, December 20, 2013 6:52:54 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>
> All,
>
> T
All,
The proof is simply the fact that the time traveling twins meet up again
with different clock times, but always in the exact same present moment.
This proves beyond any doubt there are two kinds of time, clock time which
varies by relativistic observer, and the time of the present moment (
reality's
logico-mathematical system.
Edgar
On Friday, December 20, 2013 6:52:54 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>
> All,
>
> The fundamental nature of reality is examined in detail in my recent book
> on Reality available on Amazon under my name.
>
> Marchal is on th
I've set option of getting all posts as emails which seems to be working OK
I think. But when I reply to a post via my Mac mail it never seems to get
posted to the group. Also I tried starting several new topics via Mac mail
by simply using a new subject line however none of either type of post
All,
The question of whether God exists is meaningless without first giving some
definition of what is meant by God, of how God is defined. Otherwise
everyone is talking about different things and nothing will go anywhere.
If you need a God there is only one possible rational definition and tha
801 - 823 of 823 matches
Mail list logo
