2012
"Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-10-12, 07:28:42
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Impossible connections
Roger,
Brian definitely thinks that sp
long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen
>
>
> - Receiving the following content -
> From: Richard Ruquist
> Receiver: everything-list
> Time: 2012-10-11, 11:35:29
> Subject: Re: Re: Impossible connections
>
>
> Roger,
> I know Brian Greene person
:35:29
Subject: Re: Re: Impossible connections
Roger,
I know Brian Greene personally and have read his book, Fabric of the Cosmos.
He was a postdoc at my school. He is not a founder of string theory,
Max Green is.
His view of space is quite conventional except for the extra
dimensions o
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 1:23:48 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>
> Nobody said it was empty. I was just correcting your misconception that
> spacetime had to
> be flat in the absence of matter.
>
I'm saying that it is beyond empty. It is only the inferred distance
between which objects defin
On 10/11/2012 9:41 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Brent,
According to Einstein it takes massive objects to warp spacetime.
No, that's wrong. Mass-energy warps spacetime, but the Einstein equations have non-flat
solutions with a zero stress-energy tensor. DeSitter showed this shortly after Eistei
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 12:41:29 PM UTC-4, yanniru wrote:
>
> Brent,
> According to Einstein it takes massive objects to warp spacetime.
> Therefore a warped spacetime cannot be empty.
>
Sure it can. What is mass? A relation between objects. Relativity shows us
nothing if not that. Ear
Brent,
According to Einstein it takes massive objects to warp spacetime.
Therefore a warped spacetime cannot be empty.
The apparently flat spacetime that exists
is due to dark energy, dark matter and visible matter.
Although flat, it is hardly considered to be empty.
Richard
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012
On 10/11/2012 5:17 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Spacetime could not be warped if it were a void.
Why not? Spacetime is just the set of relations, i.e. intervals, between events. If those
intervals satisfy the Minkowski metric the spacetime is flat. If they don't the spacetime
is warped.
Bre
ible
> universes, must therefore be wrong.[8]
>
> Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
> 10/11/2012
> "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen
>
>
> - Receiving the following content -
> From: Craig Weinberg
> Receiver: every
-list
Time: 2012-10-11, 08:11:17
Subject: Re: Impossible connections
I agree with Roger on this one (except for the insults). I did not know that
Einstein recognized that spacetime was a true void - I had assumed that his
conception of gravitational warping of spacetime was a literal plenum or
Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-10-11, 08:17:23
Subject: Re: Impossible connections
Spacetime could not be warped if it were a void.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> I agree with Roger on this one (except for the insults). I did not kno
Spacetime could not be warped if it were a void.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> I agree with Roger on this one (except for the insults). I did not know that
> Einstein recognized that spacetime was a true void - I had assumed that his
> conception of gravitational warpin
I agree with Roger on this one (except for the insults). I did not know
that Einstein recognized that spacetime was a true void - I had assumed
that his conception of gravitational warping of spacetime was a literal
plenum or manifold, but if it's true that he recognized spacetime as an
abstrac
Roger, You are entitled to your opinion, but that is all it is.
Richard
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
> Hi Richard Ruquist
>
> Here you go again. Monads are basically ideas.
> The BECs are physical. No physical connection is possible
> between ideas and things.
>
>
> Roger
14 matches
Mail list logo