Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: meekerdb
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-07, 17:56:48
Subject: Re: The best of all possible Worlds.
On 1/7/2013 4:43 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi meekerdb
There are some errors in fact in the Bible, but IMHO
, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: meekerdb
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-06, 16:21:42
Subject: Re: The best of all possible Worlds.
On 1/6/2013 12:57 PM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi meekerdb
Sorry, I obviously missed
On 1/7/2013 4:43 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi meekerdb
There are some errors in fact in the Bible, but IMHO it is
inerrant with regard to faith and practice. By inerrant, I mean that
it is completely consistent along those lines. You have to take it as
a whole.
By which you really mean that
: 2013-01-05, 15:32:05
Subject: Re: The best of all possible Worlds.
On 1/5/2013 6:01 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi meekerdb
You say,
It's that cartoon known as the Christian Bible.
Brent
For Christians, it's far more important to believe in a god than to
determine the accuracy
for morality or ethics.
Brent
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/6/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: meekerdb
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-06, 14:15:41
Subject: Re: The best of all possible Worlds
On 03 Jan 2013, at 19:26, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 02 Jan 2013, at 20:31, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/2/2013 5:21 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Leibniz's view, in his theodicy , which I hold to also, is that
the world down here,
On 1/5/2013 6:01 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi meekerdb
You say,
It's that cartoon known as the Christian Bible.
Brent
For Christians, it's far more important to believe in a god than to
determine the accuracy of the hypothesis. That's why they had only two
significant publications, and the most
On 1/3/2013 11:58 PM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi meekerb,
Heaven is not part of contingent creation, so your statement
that there is no heaven is illogical or irrelevant.
It was an inference from your statement, This is because things can't be good
everywhere at the same time. After the second
On 1/4/2013 3:18 AM, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/3/2013 11:58 PM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi meekerb,
Heaven is not part of contingent creation, so your statement
that there is no heaven is illogical or irrelevant.
It was an inference from your statement, This is because things can't
be good
On 1/4/2013 1:23 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 1/4/2013 3:18 AM, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/3/2013 11:58 PM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi meekerb,
Heaven is not part of contingent creation, so your statement
that there is no heaven is illogical or irrelevant.
It was an inference from your statement,
Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/3/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-02, 13:37:05
Subject: Re: The best of all possible Worlds.
On 1/2/2013 8:21 AM, Roger
*Time:* 2013-01-02, 13:37:05
*Subject:* Re: The best of all possible Worlds.
On 1/2/2013 8:21 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
I forgot add that that's why Leibniz called this
The best of all possible Worlds.
Why bad things happen to good people--Leibniz's Theodicy
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-03, 09:49:53
Subject: Re: The best of all possible Worlds.
On 1/3/2013 9:30 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P
: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-02, 14:31:51
Subject: Re: The best of all possible Worlds.
On 1/2/2013 5:21 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Leibniz's view, in his theodicy , which I hold to also, is that
the world down here, that God created, is necessarily imperfect,
so, as they say crap happens
On 02 Jan 2013, at 20:31, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/2/2013 5:21 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Leibniz's view, in his theodicy , which I hold to also, is that
the world down here, that God created, is necessarily imperfect,
so, as they say crap happens. This is because things can't be good
everywhere
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 02 Jan 2013, at 20:31, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/2/2013 5:21 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Leibniz's view, in his theodicy , which I hold to also, is that
the world down here, that God created, is necessarily imperfect,
so,
On 1/3/2013 9:59 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
I suppose that you're referring to the cpre-established perfect harmony,
which makes it seem as if everything we do is determined (by God).
IMHO that only means that God knows what we will do, not
make the decision for us.
Hi
: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-03, 12:23:33
Subject: Re: The best of all possible Worlds.
On 02 Jan 2013, at 20:31, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/2/2013 5:21 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Leibniz's view, in his theodicy , which I hold to also, is that
the world down here
I forgot add that that's why Leibniz called this
The best of all possible Worlds.
Why bad things happen to good people--Leibniz's Theodicy
As to tornadoes, there are various views, usually
part of Theodicies. Here's the view I prefer, that of my
mentor, Leibniz, explained in his
On 1/2/2013 8:21 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
I forgot add that that's why Leibniz called this
The best of all possible Worlds.
Why bad things happen to good people--Leibniz's Theodicy
As to tornadoes, there are various views, usually
part of Theodicies. Here's the view I prefer, that of my
On 1/2/2013 5:21 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Leibniz's view, in his theodicy , which I hold to also, is that
the world down here, that God created, is necessarily imperfect,
so, as they say crap happens. This is because things can't be good
everywhere at the same time.
So there is no heaven.
21 matches
Mail list logo
