2014-04-04 1:29 GMT+02:00 LizR lizj...@gmail.com:
Climate Deniers Intimidate Journal into Retracting Paper that Finds They
Believe Conspiracy Theories
Ironically, it looks like they are conspiring to silence any mention of
this fact!
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of meekerdb
Fortunately, the University of Western Australia was not so timid; so you
can read the original paper here:
On 03 Apr 2014, at 08:56, LizR wrote:
As I understand it, the QM interpretation movement stalled for
about 30 years before the MWI came along.
My view on this has changed. I tend to think that the Newton/Huygens
debate, which was a debate about the nature of light (particle, for
Newton;
On 03 Apr 2014, at 16:42, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
FWIW, on a flight this weekend I read a bit of Amoeba's Secret on my
kindle while the stranger in the seat next to me was reading
Tegmark's book. If plane rides didn't make me fall unconscious
almost immediately, that might have been
On 03 Apr 2014, at 17:46, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
They're trying to find that jet that got lost on the Indian Ocean
somewhere. But most of the objects the satellites zoom in on are
just... trash. Ocean garbage is creating so many false positives,
that it impedes finding a missing
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.comwrote:
On 4 April 2014 15:59, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest we study and evaluate it for its literal merit, rather than
'what it might mean' thus removing all constructs and myths surrounding it.
On 4 April 2014 20:33, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.comwrote:
On 4 April 2014 15:59, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest we study and evaluate it for its literal merit, rather than
'what
On 4 April 2014 16:41, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
What is more important? Faith or Honest Faith? How can we honestly believe
in God when we think God doesn't know what He created? I think its a
disservice to God, to religion and to ourselves when we choose to not to
question
Stathis Papaioannou asks:
So are you saying that if a scientific error is pointed out to you in the
Bible or the Quran you will accept that they are not the word of God?
Honest answer: I don't know.
To quote from the last paragraph of General Conclusions from Dr Maurice
Bucaille's book:
'In view
2014-04-04 12:20 GMT+02:00 Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com:
Stathis Papaioannou asks:
So are you saying that if a scientific error is pointed out to you in the
Bible or the Quran you will accept that they are not the word of God?
Honest answer: I don't know.
To quote from the last
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-04-04 12:20 GMT+02:00 Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com:
Stathis Papaioannou asks:
So are you saying that if a scientific error is pointed out to you in the
Bible or the Quran you will accept that they are
On 4/3/2014 10:47 PM, Samiya Illias wrote:
To see what I mean, please read the book by Dr Maurice Bucaille
https://ia700504.us.archive.org/18/items/TheBibletheQuranScienceByDr.mauriceBucaille/TheBibletheQuranScienceByDr.mauriceBucaille.pdf
Oh, so you didn't mean *literally*; because that
On 04 Apr 2014, at 11:44, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 4 April 2014 20:33, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 4 April 2014 15:59, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest we study
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 04 Apr 2014, at 11:44, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 4 April 2014 20:33, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Stathis Papaioannou
stath...@gmail.comwrote:
On 4 April
2014-04-04 19:05 GMT+02:00 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 04 Apr 2014, at 11:44, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 4 April 2014 20:33, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:24
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-04-04 19:05 GMT+02:00 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 04 Apr 2014, at 11:44, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 4 April 2014
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 02 Apr 2014, at 23:03, LizR wrote:
On 3 April 2014 05:56, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On
This article is packed full of falsehoods that a simple bit of research
could correct.
read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shale
As to its main point, all predictions are based on models. Models are never
the real thing. Duh! So some expert has a wrong model. Big News! LOL.
What is the point
On 04 Apr 2014, at 03:40, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, April 3, 2014 2:34:06 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 Apr 2014, at 21:34, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 1:00:54 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Apr 2014, at 21:55, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I
All of those different versions of you have slightly different quantum
states, or else they would be exactly this you and not a different
version. There is no contradiction.
On Monday, March 24, 2014 5:55:47 PM UTC-4, yanniru wrote:
According to MWI I am not unique for there are many versions
Hi Bruno:
On Friday, April 4, 2014 12:36:13 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Hal,
Yes, we might be on the same length wave for the ultimate TOE,
Thank you
but your terming is rather terrible.
I will work on it, perhaps needing some help.
Today I tend to think of the current
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.comwrote:
Solar PV is here today
Solar PV has been here for 60 years and THOUSANDS of times more money has
been spent developing it than has been spent on LFTR RD, and yet solar PV
is still just a rounding error in our total
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
On 4 April 2014 08:16, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.com wrote:
This article from Bloomberg delves into some detail on how the
unconventional oil sector is actually based on
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 12:57 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Climate models
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Hear, Hear! Sadly, we (collectively speaking) keep buying the smooth talk
and shiny baubles they promise and keep electing them. To oppose it we must
think for ourselves. Form opinions from facts we collect and examine them
to our best ability and collaborate with each other. It's hard work, very
By solar and wind its isn't.
-Original Message-
From: LizR lizj...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, Apr 2, 2014 8:13 pm
Subject: Re: Climate models
On 3 April 2014 12:17, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
We still have to possess the technology in
Last night just before I woke up I had a dream about a guy coming to the
door selling religion, so to speak - the details were a bit weird, as in
most dreams, but that was the gist of it - I sent him away, saying no
thanks we don't indulge or words to that effect.
I've never had a dream of that
Hey Chris,
About a uranium shortage. Come scrape up a few yards of dirt near where
I live and you'lll find lots and lots of uranium. We have a huge problem
with the radon gas that the stuff generates... What have you been reading?
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:56 PM, John Clark
Hey Stephen - try refining it from your dirt. Your garden dirt is not ore
quality; it is not a feasible supply. Do you believe the minuscule
quantities of uranium in your garden's dirt should be counted as part of
global uranium reserves?
Why exactly?
By your count the garden dirt argument -
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Gabriel Bodeen
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 7:43 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [foar] Amoeba's Secret now available in paperback
FWIW, on a flight this weekend I read a
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Telmo Menezes
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 02 Apr 2014, at 23:03, LizR wrote:
On 3 April 2014 05:56, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.com
Here is the thing. You are complete discounting future technological
advancements in your analysis. 50 years ago, no one considered shale to be
a source ore for hydrocarbons. Soon enough we will be syphoning hydrogen
off Jupiter. Why the panic over resources? Lean forward man! Think forward.
No
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Paul King
Here is the thing. You are complete discounting future technological
advancements in your analysis. 50 years ago, no one considered shale to be a
source ore for hydrocarbons.
read this paper please and ponder its implications if applied universally.
http://ajae.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/02/24/ajae.aau001.abstract
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.comwrote:
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
We live in a world ruled by power; this is the fundamental problem - IMO.
No, no problem is without a solution. Find the solution that keeps the
current equilibria in place. Our world is a chaotic and complex system. One
does not harness such a beast. One learns to ride it.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014
On Friday, April 4, 2014 6:00:09 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
Last night just before I woke up I had a dream about a guy coming to the
door selling religion, so to speak - the details were a bit weird, as in
most dreams, but that was the gist of it - I sent him away, saying no
thanks we don't
are betting the destiny of planet earth that these hypothetical future
technologies will become realized in time for the human race to cheat
destiny again and again
Say again? What models are you trusting?
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.comwrote:
Here's the Mountain Pass rare earth mine in Southern California: 35.48°N 115.53°W It
produced cerium, lanthanium neodymium, and europium for rare earth magnets until the
Chinese undercut the market. It has huge piles of tailings rich in thorium and radium
which are at present just a waste
Oh come on now - a climate change denier are you? For real?
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Paul King
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 7:07 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Climate models
read this paper
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Paul King
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 7:09 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Climate models
We live in a world ruled by power; this is the fundamental problem - IMO.
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Paul King
are betting the destiny of planet earth that these hypothetical future
technologies will become realized in time for the human race to cheat
destiny again and again
Say
Dear Brent,
Good question. A leading question in response. How is it that we
(generically speaking) are leaving such designs and building up to
inefficient systems to perform?
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:15 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Here's the Mountain Pass rare earth mine in
Br
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of meekerdb
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 7:15 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Climate models
Here's the Mountain Pass rare earth mine in Southern California: 35.48°N
115.53°W
ones that I built for myself. The data is hard to get...
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.comwrote:
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Paul King
are betting the destiny of
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Craig Weinberg
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 7:11 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: My scepticism took a small knock today
On Friday, April 4, 2014 6:00:09 PM UTC-4, Liz R
By solar and wind its isn't.
Current global installed solar PV capacity is greater than 150 GW; in two
years or so this is expected to surpass 300GW of installed capacity. The
installed capacity base for Solar PV has been doubling every two years or so
for quite some time now and so far
This data is interesting:
http://www.indeed.com/salary/Green-Growth-Ventures-LLC.html
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.comwrote:
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Paul King
are
back trace from: Merrill Lynch Information Technology Intranet future
trading
http://www.ite.poly.edu/presentations/MLcase.pdf page 11.
Merrill Lynch is the most active trading firm on the New York Stock
Exchange,
with a 1995 market share of 11.7%.
I rest my case.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:09
On 5 April 2014 15:10, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, April 4, 2014 6:00:09 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
Last night just before I woke up I had a dream about a guy coming to the
door selling religion, so to speak - the details were a bit weird, as in
most dreams, but that
On 5 April 2014 06:14, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.comwrote:
2014-04-04 19:05 GMT+02:00 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
the existence
50 matches
Mail list logo
