we have a 2-node active/passive exchange 2000 cluster running fine. i can
fail the exchange group over, and downtime is generally around 60 seconds.
We are looking at possibly going with 2 x 4-node datacenter clusters to
support 20,000 exchange users.
Rob
-Original Message-
From:
Well it's overcast, warm (don't know how that happened) but not raining
(horayy) here in Weybridge.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I mean weather report , The spell checker took liberty to change the meaning
Kuminda Chandimith
Sr. Technical Consultant
Ducont.com FZ-LLC
Tel: + 971-4-3913000 Ext 237
Fax: +971-4-3913001
http://www.ducont.com
-Original Message-
From: Kuminda Chandimith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
cool and great!
At last, I can hear good news :-)
Sir Robert, how long has the cluster been running (without downtime)?
Did you have some difficulty? (You could share your experience off list
since this topic is too general, IMHO).
Thanks,
-botp
-Original Message-
From: Robert Ellis
Hi All,
I would like to share my view with you all on Exchange on a cluster. We have
a 2 node Active/passive NT 4.0 cluster with Exchange 5.5 SP3 running on it.
From the start I am not able to make it work as it should. The failover from
one node to another takes not less than 20 minutes and
hi all,
we're having trouble installing scanmail on our 2 node exchange 5.5 cluster,
running on win2k.
it manages to install onto the passive node but fails when attempting the
active node. We're not getting much joy through trend tech support, so if
anyone here has any experience with scanmail
Have you tried failing over and then installing on the (then) passive node?
Regards,
Rob Ellis
Messaging Consultant
Service Delivery Solutions Programmes
IBM Global Services
DDI: 01256 752845
Mobile: 07974 111867
Fax: 01256 754899
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Have you tried failing over and then installing on the (then)
passive node?
no, but i would not expect that to work since the installer requires both
nodes to be installed at one time, or it reports failure...
maybe this is worth a try as a last resort, although I am aiming for a clean
I've installed it once on a 2 node, I don't recall having any problems like
that. Could it be a permissions thing?
Regards,
Rob Ellis
Messaging Consultant
Service Delivery Solutions Programmes
IBM Global Services
DDI: 01256 752845
Mobile: 07974 111867
Fax: 01256 754899
Email: [EMAIL
Yes it will. You use the Outlook Settings Control Panel to set them up.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2001 14:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Outlook Mac 2001 (2
I hope you've already called PSS, but you want forceful?
http://home.eunet.no/~pnordahl/ntpasswd/
I think I'd have security escort that utility out of the building, if it
were headed toward a production server. I'd pay PSS.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL
That's a good question. There is an API gateway running on the Novell
server. With regard to the Groupwise SMTP agent, (Gateway to Internet
Mail) I would have initially assumed that once the directories had been
replicated, I would be able to use Novell box (not the case).
The API gateway
In network control panel, click on the protocols. Double-click on TCP/IP to
get to the properties page. Enter the domain name there.
Mike Morrison
NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I had issues. It turned out that they did not support versions 3.5
clustered on W2K with Exchange 5.5 with sp4.
we have scanmail v3.52 with W2K, Exchange 5.5/sp4 - is this compatible to
your knowledge?
It turned out it did not get all the
registry entries
installed on the other cluster
Hello - Having read some info about the pitfalls of moving an Exchange 5.5
server to another domain, and that it is not a good idea to do so. I would
like to know if any of you have tried it and how did you do it. This
particular server is a member of a site with a couple of other exchange
No, I didn't say they're a flop. I said that expectations with respect to
clusters are often off target. I still don't have enough information to
recommend whether you should go forward with them or not. I suppose if you
hired Rob Ellis to implement it and provide training, you might just get a
I am looking for the context for scripting the creation of custom
recipients (AD Contacts)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
For 1 2 you need to learn how to write LDAP queries, which will be very
useful since you can utilize that skill to manipulate AD. To use LDAP
against Exchange 5.5 in VB, you'll also need to learn ADSI. I've never used
it but I hear it's pretty easy. Tom Rizzo has a very good book that covers
In our case it would be 10,000 users on a datacenter cluster. Running 3
active/1 passive, we end up with around 3400 users per node.
By the way, I don't consider myself any kind of authority on clustering or
exchange!
Regards,
Rob Ellis
Messaging Consultant
Service Delivery Solutions
WIN2K Server sp1/ Exchange 5.5 sp4
I received an error in Event Viewer this morning. Event 1025. I have been
using EXMerge to move over some users from another server, not sure if that
might play a part. MS Says in the TechNet article it's a problem with
Exchange 4.0 and they know about it.?
MSDN is a fairly useful resource for this.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/wss/_cdo_cr
eating_a_contact.asp (Link wrap yadda yadda)
*
Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb,
Dan, are you installing over an existing scanmail installation or is this
new? I had this same problem with my 5.5 cluster and we finally got it to
install by removing the older version first.
Now the thing STILL won't send any e-mail notifications when it finds a
virus, but that's another
Hello all
I have two Exchange 5.5 sites with one server in each site (Windows NT
Server 4.0/sp6a, Exchange 5.5/sp3 on both servers). I am using Exchange
behind Proxy 2.0 in one site, and in order to make inter-site communication
possible, I had to assign a fixed TCP port for the MTA (I am using
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696
also available here:
http://downloads.members.tripod.com/ladysun1969/misc/relay.tif
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam:
Does one or more of these servers have multiple IP addresses? If so, try
using a hosts file.
*
Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071
I tried doing the relaying and this is the error message I'm getting:
550 Relaying is prohibited
and also the users that has multiple email address can't get outside email
now.
pls. help
_
List posting FAQ:
Jeremy, what exactly did you do?
if you're using the web interface to access this list, please be sure to
click the box/button/whatever that includes the original message text.
thanks
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata:
I installed over an older version and had no problems on a 5.5 Clustered
Exchange.
And it emails virus notices.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node
On the routing restritions page, which is located under the routing tab of
the IMS properties page, I added the IP addresses. Stop and re-start
Message Transfer Agent and Internet Mail Service.
Jeremy, what exactly did you do?
if you're using the web interface to access this list, please
I've rarely had a successful installation of a new version of Trend over an
older version. I've pretty much given up trying and uninstall the older
version, clean out the bits that the uninstall fails to remove properly and
then do a fresh installation. It saves me from having to do it later when
The IP addresses of what? You snipped to much so I don't know what you're
referring to anymore.
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
I'm sorry but I just assumed that you read the previous messages.
IP addresses of the client PC and server that has the third party software
thats trying to send outside mail.
The IP addresses of what? You snipped to much so I don't know what =
you're
referring to anymore.
-Mich=E8le
I'm assuming that the MTA static port assignment was done through a registry
change. Verify that it's still there. SP4 may have overwritten it.
S
-Original Message-
From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Did you make the change on the Exchange Server with IMS? If you make the
change on another Exchange Server and stop/restart IMS, there's a good
chance that you restart the service without the information replicate to the
server with IMS, hence your IMS working with old config.
S.
PS: We read
I would not agree with this assessment without first seeing the entire contents of the
event AND finding out if it's actually causing any problems. Is it? Or are you just
worried because there are red stop signs in your event log?
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 09:26:47 -0500 , Exchange Discussions
We use Exchange server 5.5 as an internal mail system
and Seattle Lab mail as our external email. Our users
use Outlook98 as clients. Somehow we always get some
errors:
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
But if we upgrade to Outlook 2000, it will be fine.
Please help.
Thanks!
Ummm No psychics here. When do you get these errors? Are these in the
event log? NDR? Pop-up window?
S.
-Original Message-
From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: x400 connector?
We use Exchange
and what are the errors? Those are just encapsulated addresses down there,
not error messages.
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
Suppose no encapsulated addresses shown in the
receipt. Why?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and what are the errors? Those are just
encapsulated addresses down there,
not error messages.
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata:
You still haven't answered my question.
-Original Message-
From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: x400 connector?
These shown only in recipent side.
--- Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ummm No
This is the error(or encapsulated addresses ) which
supposed not to show on recipient side.
IMCEAEX
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What receipt? You still haven't posted the errors.
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/Personal/Files/?File=~MoreInfo.TXT
Jim,
That is not an error message.
Can you please describe, in excrutiating detail, what exactly is happening?
(Off the cuff, and without any other information from Jim, I think that your
users don't have SMTP addresses but are still allowed to send Internet
email. )
-Michèle
Immigration
Thank you Serdar for the reply, and yes both sides are at sp4.
Regarding reverting back to sp3, does it actually work to restore on sp3
whereas the latest backup was made after the upgrade to sp4? According to MS
PSS, you should install the same service packs before restoring.
Best Regards
SP4 modified the schema of the databases. You did make a backup before
upgrading to SP4, right?
- Original Message -
From: Nizar El-Assaad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:04 PM
Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5
That's not an error. That's nothing more than an encapsulated address.
You're gonna have to get more specific here.
- Original Message -
From: Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:55 AM
Subject: RE: x400 connector?
Umpfh. In that case, your latest backup won't work. The only one that
would is the last successful backup before the upgrade.
-Original Message-
From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MTA
Nope. Sorry, you'll have to either manually enter them (or import them using CSV file
and the field Secondary-Proxy-Addresses if you want to do bulk changes). It sucks
but them's the breaks.
Eric
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:00:14 -0400 , Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is it
Actually, you won't have to configure Outlook in that fashion if you just
install IMS on your Exchange Server and point it to you SL server. It can
save you a lot of headache. Also, when you install IMS, I believe it
generates SMTP addresses for all of your mailboxes.
S.
-Original
we only have one Exchange server.
We only have 2 cats.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
I only have one piece of beef jerky left :(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Scharff, Chris
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: third party client can't send email to external address!?
we
Thanks for all the input, I went ahead and called PSS and they had me
reinstall windows 2k to a differently named winnt directory so I could
recover the data, and rebuild. They still didn't have much information for
me as to why the migration caused this behavior, I am just glad it is an
isolated
Sounds like you're being used as a relay. Make that stop. The FAQ has a
link to an article explaining how to do this, IIRC.
M- Original Message -
From: Adil Azad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 4:04 AM
Subject: RE:
What version of Exchange? Do you have it set up to accept inbound
connections for that domain?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Stevens, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:15 AM
Subject: RE: unknown domain?
The ip
Hello Folks,
This one has me stumped and my next stop is PSS but I thought I would try
here first.
We have been running Exchange 5.5 in our Windows 2000 domain for quite some
time with the ADC. When E2K SP1 was released we started planning our
migration. We installed the E2K server in the
Thank you, Soysal! We will try the way you
suggested.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Great Inspector Soysal! :-)
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata:
http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
What VPN protocol and client are you usingPPTP or IPSEC...cisco or
windows client software.
If you are using IPSEC, make sure you set the MTU setting to 1400.
-Tony
-Original Message-
From: Michael Marchiondo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:35 AM
I don't think you're way off at all... this is exactly what I was getting
ready to suggest when your message came in. First rule of Outlook
Troubleshooting: If Outlook is slow launching, check DNS.
Mike Morrison
NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
-Original
Make sure you have WINS available for resolution and static mappings for
your mail servers. I no MS says win2k does not need wins but as many have
found out, that turining off wins causes many problems. I have directly
discovered problems with Outlook over VPN when not using the wins service.
It's so only necessary to ask once (or are there three of you?). It was a
Good Thing that you changed the subject line this time, though, so you get
credit there.
I'm not sure what the first sentence has to do with the second, but I'll
give it a stab.
Sure, you can integrate the GAL into a
Interesting stuff there. Fun little tests to run. In any case, it speeds
things up a bit, but not to the extent I would have thought.
M
- Original Message -
From: Scharff, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:54 PM
An account with the Exchange Full Admin right is what he should need.
Shema, Domain, Enterprise, etc. don't matter to Exchange 2K - it's the
Exchange-specific rights he needs. Also, Admin rights on the local box.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi
We have a single Site/Server setup currently, and are looking to add some
additional servers to the site, to be based at remote offices.
Problem is, we cant get a successful installation. It always fails towards
the end with the following message;
some replication operations were not
Hi there,
We are running Exchange Server 5.5 at our site. I have problems with users
not being able to log on to their mailboxes using Outlook Web Access (trough
Internet Browser).
It has been setup for them to enter their domain logon details first to get
to the Outlook Web Access logon Page.
How can the Address Book default columns be changed so users cannot view the
alias?
The full story:)
In Outlook 98 Address Book, the 'alias field' is visible to users (if they
maximise window or scroll right).
Our NT Username = user's unique staff number = mailbox alias.
Seemed a good idea,
Our law firm has a client that would like to have the e-mail exchange
encrypted. We do not want to use digital certificates because of
administration. I have heard that you can connect two seperate mail
domains over the Internet securely with the Internet Mail Service. Is this
correct? How is it
Hi everybody!
My Private Information Store was corrupted by a RAID array problem. I
have repaired the drive array, and restored my last backup of the IS,
however, the IS corruption persists. I get -1018 errors, and Outlook
clients have periodic troubles moving or deleting messages. I have
What utilitie or procedure can be used to extract mailbox data from an
orphaned .ost file to a new mailbox? Thanks.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Test
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I attempted to send an email this recipient and received the following NDR.
Although it's clearly a 550 relay error from their server, the other parts
like does not like recipient and giving up I have never seen before.
Just wondering if this is common and I've just missed it. Thanks.
This
Slow down cowboy! When you first got the -1018 pop up, what was going on in the
Application log? It's possible you just needed to patch the database. Check your
logs and report back.
Eric
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 10:03:11 -0500, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi everybody!
It's encrypted with a key pair. The key resides in the profile in the registry. Are
you saying the profile AND the mailbox have both been deleted?
Eric
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:11:43 -0500, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What utilitie or procedure can be used to extract
F
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Test
Test
_
List posting FAQ:
You can configure the text for SMTP responses. Some SMTP servers allow you
to do that, and I believe it's possible in E2K using protocol events. Does
anyone know if it can be done in 5.5?
S.
-Original Message-
From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September
I don't believe it can be done in 5.5.
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
Pinky, are you pondering what I'm
Ugh, are you serious? Static mappings in WINS are EVIL. Besides, DNS is
where most of these problems are. Outlook uses DNS to resolve the Exchange
server, not WINS. If Outlook is slugglish, putting static entries in WINS
won't do anything to resolve the problem.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
How about calling PSS? They are supposed to be pretty good at fixing
problemsIt may or may not produce a quicker result, but I'm betting you
would be able to get some first-hand instruction on using some of the repair
utilities.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine
I would suspect that the Move Mailbox will fail on the mailboxes that the
users are having trouble with. For those, you may try using ExMerge.
Really though, call PSS. You won't regret it.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
If anyone finds a way, let me know because I want my Exchange server to say And
then... instead of CR LF
(Dude Where's My Car RULES!)
Eric
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 15:18:10 -0400, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You can configure the text for SMTP responses. Some SMTP servers
Are there any anti=virus programs running on the server? If so stop them and re-try.
Eric
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 21:16:47 +0100 , Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At the moment, I'm trying to add another server on the same subnet across a
100mb switched LAN
The connection
Mahesh,
FYI, PSS recommended reregistering the cdo.dll and cdohtml.dll on these IIS
servers. Right now we are monitoring them to see if that helped or not.
S./
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:25 PM
To: Exchange
I always love seeing the messages
Management has decided they want a system to do extended foo. But they
don't want to spend any money on foo management or foo tools. What can
we get?
I know it isnt totally the admins fault they get put in these
situations, but rather stupid managers who think
Are you talking about Q174754?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers
(5.5)
Our law firm
If it works internally, check relay settings.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 6 September 2001 7:57 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: third party client can't send email to external address!?
Hi,
We have an Exchange 5.5 and Microsoft
one other thing that I know we had run into here a long while ago was the
issue of the RPC binding order on machines causing clients to hang on
launch.. I can't remember the QFile right now but the key name is
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider and the Value to look at
is
Ben,
Try this for size. At one company I used to work for they had a WINS
failure and had to reregister everything in WINS. In order to be
proactive for any future WINS failures, they put static entries for all NT
servers in DNS (about 350+ servers). Oh, I forgot to mention that as a
second
and then?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR that I've never seen before
If anyone finds a way, let me know because I want my Exchange server to say
And then...
Yes.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cool
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Barry
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers
(5.5)
Yes.
If you're using the web interface to
access this list, please be sure to click the box/button/whatever that
includes the original message text. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: James Barry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:30 PM
To: Exchange
Have you ever done this? Have you ever worked with ESMTP?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
eric: SMTP 250-NO AND THEN
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:22:24 -0500 , Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
and then?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR that
The text is for human consumption... The only relavent bit is 550. I know of
one server which answers 550 fsck off spammer.
*
Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX
Hi all,
Whilst on the x.400 connector theme, is it required within a small LAN
environment ?
I have Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on an NT4 box with clients from a mixed
bag of Outlook 2k and 98. I use the IMS to connect to the internet (via a
Linux box).
I did have another Exchange server running
You probably don't need the x.400 connector; you probably don't even have it
installed. But the x.400 errors can show up because all Exchange objects
have an x.400 address even without the connector installed (it's needed for
internal routing). If you would like assistance with your MTA errors
Have Done - Still doing it!
-Original Message-
From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 6 September 2001 11:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The Internet Mail Service requires DNS domain
name...
In network control panel, click on the
Thanks for the response Ben, and I see your point to be very valid. I guess
their is no real reason to have the static mappings, only that I did it as a
precautionary measure. Since this action could pose to be my downfall, maybe
I will just let windows do it's own thing with wins.
Thanks again,
Exchange 5.5 SP4
A custom recipient is a member of DL1 and a member of DL2. If I send a message to both
DL1 and DL2, the custom recipient would receive two copies of the message. Other
non-custom recipients (Mailboxes) just receive one copy. I want the custom recipient
being able to receive
I have searched extensively to try and find a solution to appending
messages to the end of an out going email in Exchange 2000. Everything I
find seems to indicate that a person needs to be a programmer to edit SMTP
files just to append a message. (Exchange 5.5 offered a registry hack,
although
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4 SP6a
Today the IMS on one of our Exchange servers puked. It seems that a
malformed incoming message caused the IMS to die, in turn causing the
Information Store to die. My users started having problems connecting to
the server, so I looked in the event log and found the
Hi all,
Forgive me if this has been answered in the past but I can't seem to
find it in the FAQ's, Microsoft Tech Database, or anyplace else for that
matter!
I've just finished (?) rolling out a brand new W2K server farm with
Exchange 2K server and Outlook Web Access as the remote mail
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
