The IMC/SMTP services receive the message with the time zone attached
(if you look at the message header) but I know of no way to have
Exchange take that information and insert it into the message.
-Original Message-
From: Kully [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June 2002 15:25
To:
Does that go for EURO disney as well?
ah... I get it, a virtual tour of disneyland...
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June, 2002 11:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: SQ - urgent
I just signed up for a weekend pass to Costa Kingdom.
I have a situation here where when a user send message to a domain in
Italy (Rome ONLY!) it fails with the message below.
Your message has been delayed and is still awaiting delivery
to the following recipient(s):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message delayed
I/O error encountered
during command: (message
Hi,
have you tried leaving it for a while? I have the same thing here where the
admin program becomes not responding but it is still working and if I
leave it, it finishes correctly. Happens every time.
HTH
Rachel
--
From: Tony McCarthy[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To:
I am having a similar problem, I have created a new
mailbox and I made myself the owner, my question now
is how to set the rule to delete messages delivered to
this mailbox. In the past I have not been able to set
a rule that applies to a secondary mailbox. I can set
rules through outlook 2000
Rather than set a mailbox and fill it with smtp addresses from ex
employees do the same with a distribution list and assign no members.
This way the mails will just disappear into oblivion.
-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 June 2002 09:15
To:
I followed this advise and it has worked great.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees personalmail
Rather than set a mailbox and fill it
Delivery Options; Alternate recipient; Select from GAL or create Custom
Recipient
-Original Message-
From: Jim Robson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: mailbox forwarding
Anybody know the best way to set up a users
Delivery Options; Alternate recipient; Select from GAL or create Custom
Recipient
-Original Message-
From: Jim Robson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: mailbox forwarding
Anybody know the best way to set up a users
Drop a relay in the DMZ - either *nix or Win2k running IIS's SMTP service
will work fine.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Server [mailto:[EMAIL
That's on their end. They have some funky delivery restrictions
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
You can write a rule that does all meeting classes from a specific sender.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
As was said earlier, 4xx errors are transient failures, meaning that they
will retry until the message expires.
Generally its an issue on the recipient's end - their server is down or not
accepting connections at this time.
Can you do a manual connection and see if you can successfully send an
Yes I found the same articles but not matching my problem. Anyway yesterday I deleted
the Name showed in the message from DNS the error immediately stopped but today
again it is giving the same. I don't know is this relates to DNS. The Name is
actually not an email ID, It is simply showing
Microsoft says that GG are the way to go, but every network is
different. If you have an admin that knows how to clean up the
structure when someone leaves then managing this situation by
individuals would probably be ideal.
Oppturnity of Scale. Microsoft doesn't normally recommend a very
Can you write a rule though to delete all meeting classes from EVERYBODY, or
would I have to setup a rule for each user? Of course, setting up a rule
for each user will NOT happen!
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 7:21 AM
You can start here:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/search.asp?LangID=20LangDIR=EN-US
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: In search of security fixes
I'm looking for a list
I have a strange problem with OOO that started a few months back. Layout is
Exchange 5.5sp4 servers (3 in the main site 1 each in 2 other sites).
Clients are all Outlook 2K SP1. Single mailbox server, single utility
server, single unified messaging server (voicemail).
User will setup OOO as
You might need to define what you mean by Backup mail server.
If you mean a message store (e.g. Exchange's Information Store) where e-mail
gets delivered and placed in a users mailbox... then you can't do this with
Exchange.
If you mean a routing server, then you are continuing the idea that
RESEND - The first copy didn't seem to make it to the list. Apologies if I
goofed!
Can someone please explain how this SPAM email arrived in several mailboxes
within our organization?
At first glance, it appears to have come from a former employee who hasn't
worked here in years and has long
I have an average Exch 5.5 site with 4000 mailboxes plus an assortment of
shared mailboxes and distro lists which support a lot of Internet mail for
customer support, etc. Some mailboxes have internet aliases that are
non-intuitive and we occasionally have difficulty figuring out to which
mailbox
Hi Guys,
I have not been on the list for over a year so excuse me if I have missed
the threads on this
Can I re-route all inbound unknown recipient mail to a single mailbox in
Exchange 2000? (I known how to do it in 5.5)
At the moment it goes into the badmail directory.
This is for people
Is this a new install. Did it ever work from the outside.
- Original Message -
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 7:57 AM
Subject: RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up
Did last night, same issues
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q324021SD=MSKB;
-Original Message-
From: Gary Duckman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Catch All
Hi Guys,
I have not been on the list for over a year so
MIMESweeper for SMTP by Clearswift or eManager by Trend would certainly help
get rid a good bit of the SPAM. Will it get rid of everything - probably
not. However, it gets rid of a good percentage it would be worth it.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Shawn Connelly
There ought to be someone who has the [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp
address, the mail will drop there, defaulted to the person who installed
the first server. If not, assign it to yourself.
-Original Message-
From: Gary Duckman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 June 2002 15:41
To: Exchange
Hi quick question Exchange 5.5 sp3 on NT 4.0 sp6. If I set up a public
folder and then email to to this folder it accepts the email.
IE.. I have a mailbox setup for [EMAIL PROTECTED] I made a public folder
called johnsmith. I can email the folder by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And it gets delivered to
You can remove the SMTP address from the public folder.
Ant.
--
Anthony Drewery MCSE
Messaging Services
CP Ships, Crawley, UK
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 June 2002 16:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public folders delivering mail?!
Hi quick
Friggin remove the SMTP address.
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public folders delivering mail?!
Hi quick question Exchange 5.5 sp3 on NT 4.0 sp6. If I set up a public
folder and then
That behavior is by design. A public folder can have an email address and
can receive email.
Maybe you can clarify the issue you are having...
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Rules are Client based... Each guy needs it. There are ways to automate
this but it may take more time for you to learn than to just implement the
one-on-one fashion.
Can you write a rule though to delete all meeting classes from EVERYBODY, or
would I have to setup a rule for each user? Of
OK but I am dealing with 500 users. Is there a default setting so no public
folders recv email?
-Original Message-
From: Drewery, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public folders delivering mail?!
Within
And they each have a public folder named similarly to their mailbox???
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 June 2002 16:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public folders delivering mail?!
OK but I am dealing with 500 users. Is there a default setting
If you want to change the current PFs you're into the realms of directory
exporting, modification of the CSV file and reimporting.
-Original Message-
From: Drewery, Anthony
Sent: 26 June 2002 16:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public folders delivering mail?!
And they each
There are plenty of them on TechNet. Have at them.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jim Underwood
Sent: Tuesday, June
Are the servers close network-wise?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony McCarthy
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:47 PM
Create and use a profile that logs into the mailbox. However, the
advice to use an empty distribution list (group) is better.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I used ADMT to migrate the accounts, then set up the ADC, which populated
the accounts with the Exchange info. I did not use ADClean. I ran the LDAP
query today suggested in Q309222, the value you mention is not populated for
any users.
Ran into another situation today that may be related. I
Out of Office data is stored in hidden messages in the user's mailbox.
I wonder if your unified messaging package is affecting this
configuration.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
It doesn't work that way. You can have a postmaster mailbox that gets
copies of non-delivery reports, but nothing that acts as a catch-all
mailbox standard in Exchange.
If you want to create an event sink:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q324021SD=MSKB;
Ed Crowley
Ok thanks
-Original Message-
From: Drewery, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public folders delivering mail?!
If you want to change the current PFs you're into the realms of directory
exporting,
Read Internet RFC 821.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shawn Connelly
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 7:25 AM
To:
Also, each public folder has permissions. You can tell each folder
owner that they can restrict use of that folder themselves.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just an upgrade to sp2
can't remember if public folders showed up previously though.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up
Is this a new
But will that do what he original want to do re-route all inbound unknown
recipient mail to a single mailbox. The Catch-all re-routes all mail not
just the unknown. Or am I reading the Q article wrong.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
You might be right. I haven't played with it. I guess a logical
extention of the script would be to look up the SMTP address in AD and
skip processing if it exists.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
Sounds like a rights issue. But you said it works internally OK but external
access is failing. And this all happened after applying SP2. I know in SP2
for E2K there is the ability to hide certain items in OWA using segmentation
but I don't think that is the problem because it won't give you
Trying think why you would want to implement a Catch-all script. Sounds like
mail bagging. If so you would want to do that from a relay in front of
Exchange should it go down.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
What happens when you try to access the public folders directly,
http://machinename/public ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA Issues No Public
I don't want to. But it's a very frequently requested feature.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent:
Thanks,
I guess I should have though of that.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: In search of security fixes
You can start here:
I checked that first but appears you cannot disable SMTP from the client
side. Would be fantastic for us but alas!!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public folders delivering
Isn't that for all mails to a single domain going to a specific user? We
got this a little while ago and I quote from the summary
This article describes how to create an event sink to capture
all e-mail messages that are sent to a particular domain, and then
direct them to a single
Could be. I saw Catch All in the subject, so I did a Ctrl-c, Ctrl-V, Send.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Catch All
Isn't that for all mails to a single domain going to a
I am currently migrating some Exchange 5.5 users to some new hardware. The
new system is running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Win2k Adv Server SP2. The server
is a member server in an NT 4 domain (they are not quite ready for AD here
yet). I was hoping someone could clarify some confusing information
So what does your email administrator say about the issue?
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public folders delivering mail?!
I checked that first but appears you cannot
I don't recall that ever being an Exchange feature. What is often
requested is, Send all mails for this domain that are not defined in
Exchange to this recipient object without sending an NDR.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and
Yes, you can. In Exchange 5.5 change the permissions for Default. In
Exchange 2000 it's Anonymous that you'd change.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are looking into replacing InoculateIT with Sybari Antigen.
Currently we run an SMTP gateway (Tumbleweed MMS) that connects to the IMC of our
Exchange bridgehead server.
Utilizing Sybari's Antigen on the IMC, couldn't you remove the need for the separate
SMTP gateway solution?
Thanks for
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Brock, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC as SMTP internet gateway
We are looking into replacing InoculateIT with Sybari Antigen.
Currently we run an SMTP gateway (Tumbleweed
It seems to be working now doing that internally.
Cannot test externally until tonight.
What does it all mean thenif it works if you just put in public but when you put
in exchange it does everything but the public folders and gives that nice error.
Avi
-Original Message-
From:
couldn't you remove the need for
the separate SMTP gateway solution?
That depends entirely on what the SMTP gateway solution was doing. I don't
believe there's anywhere close to a 1 to 1 feature map between MMS and
Sybari's Antigen, so it would depend in large part on the functionality
desired
Does anyone know if there is any danger in changing the name of an OU within Windows
2000 sp2 ad and if there are any chances of this screweing up the exchange 2k sp2
users which resided in that OU?
_
List posting FAQ:
Good point.
I was thinking strictly in terms of AV, but if the gateway is applying those
lovely disclaimers etc etc, then obviously the need for MMS may still exist.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:05 PM
To: Exchange
If there's no $ cost to continuing AV scanning in MMS, one still might
consider scanning at least the most risky file types with a secondary
product. Course the maintenance $ on MMS simply for virus scanning would be
just silly.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL
This is done in exchange admin.
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 June 2002 16:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public folders delivering mail?!
Is this done via the outlook client or at the 5.5 server. The issue
being I
have users who have
Try this.
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q313932
- Original Message -
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:54 PM
Subject: RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up
It
Any danger? Who knows? There isn't supposed to be any problem.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Friese, Casey
Sent:
Here is my issue. I have a 2k server set up to send and receive internet
mail using a smtp connector. I am running mixed mode. All my 5.5 sites
send with no problem to the internet. When I try to send an email to one of
our 2k routing groups (connected to the bridgehead server via routing
I have the patch, talked with pss today and they gave it to me, will apply tonight
when everyone goes to bed and see what happens.
I will reply tomorrow again depending on what happens.
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002
Has anyone ever noticed this behavior from Outlook 2002, which was installed
with Office XP Pro.
1. Whenever I close outlook, the process is never closed just the
application GUI. I have to bring up task manager and kill the outlook
process before I can re-launch outlook. Any help would be
Ok...standing by for the blast wave.
I will try to word this best as possible.
Exchange 5.5 (sp4) on W2k (sp2). We currently have Ldap enabled over the
site (I haven't checked this setting in awhile, but I could have sworn it
was disabled back when. Maybe a SP overwrote the value?) Anyways,
Haven't seen that and I'm running the same version. Maybe it's the
Dell--I'm running on a Compaq Deskpro and on a Compaq Armada laptop!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
No E2K around? No, you probably don't need LDAP enabled.
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ldap enable?
Ok...standing by for the blast wave.
I will try to word this best as
Neither OWA nor Outlook/MAPI use LDAP.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stevens, Dave
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002
HAHHA, nice one.
You wouldn't be biased now would you?
IT is a weird problem, I had the same issue a week, but luckily it was time
for a full rebuild. Now it still does it, hm.
Doesn't start happening until after I install Pre-sp2 hotfixes for Office. I
will try and reinstall office and
Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other
purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner.
I don't believe a familiarity of initials necessarily constitutes knowledge
of a subject. Would it have been so difficult for you to write,
Distribution List?? No, I
Have you got some other application such as 'ActiveSync' running, which
is keeping Outlook open.
Yours,
Julian Stone
Exchange 2000 Consultant
This message sent from Exchange 2000 SP3 build 6249.1
Netstore - Europe's Leading Application Service Provider
Tel: +44 (0) 1344 444349
Mobile: +44
32k limit on rules... suppose one could go to a server side script after
that however, if Jane Doe from the warehouse was subscribed to 57 joke
of the week mailing lists which neither check for bounces, nor offer
unsubscribe information, adding her to a black hole DL eliminates her mail
I see this occasionally, no particular reason why it starts or stops. Most of the
time, if I leave it for long enough it will go away. I blame it on the phase of the
moon.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:43 PM
thanks for the input.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ldap enable?
Neither OWA nor Outlook/MAPI use LDAP.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
I disagree entirely. Michael is a typical dumb-ass and ascribing smart-ass
stature to his comments demeans smart-asses everywhere.
As for his school bully status, again... school bullies everywhere are
insulted.
I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people!
I don't know what
Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 09:23:08 -0500
X-Message-Number: 35
Per 4, it might explain why the acronym DL was such a foreign concept to
him, the idea of a DL with no recipients as a solution to
No but I plan to install it
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging.
Have you got some other application such as 'ActiveSync' running, which
Hahah, I tend to do that with MS products occasionally.
I so love linux for this, if it's screwing up I can pop the hood and get my
arms greasy and fix it.
-TOny
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:04 PM
To: Exchange
I saw this a lot when I was working on a com addin.
Failing to set objects to nothing at exit will cause the
-Original Message-
From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002 issues with
[2nd attempt; first was user error.]
I saw this a lot when I was working on a com addin.
Failing to set objects to nothing at exit will cause the app to keep running.
I would check for a custom vbaproject.otm or any com addins.
--Gary
-Original Message-
From: Anthony L. Sollars
Silly little problem with authenticating to my E2K server through a POP3 connection.
I have a user who can log into the network, check his mail through outlook when
connected to the network and can also log into his inbox through OWA. When I
configured his outlook client on his laptop to
I just recently explained a much better way of 'killing' those unwanted
messages by way of a server based rule.
As I mentioned making a DL forces Exchange to accept the messages as
legitimate mail rather than bouncing them, as it should.
I think the definition of 'much better' is very much a
Are you entering his username in the proper format?
(domain\nt_id\mailbox_alias)
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K - Pop3
Silly little problem with authenticating to my
As it should? And where is it written that Exchange should bounce mail?
Your method sounds like an administrative nightmare to me.
An acronym can be a word formed from the initial letters of a name, so DL is
a legitimate acronym.
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL
Uh - Shawn. . . think again about your rule. Besides taking a bit more effort to
implement, your rule *still* requires the server to accept the mail.
And, no, as the admin you don't have to see all the nondeliverable stuff if you don't
want to. Go to your IMS and take a look at the options
haven't tried that, I don't have any other pop clients setup that way and they're
working fine and since I could telnet to the server and exchange recognizes the
username I didn't think that would make any difference...we'll give it a try though
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
Ok Thanks, I did update to the latest COM+ engine version. Wonder if there
are some incompatibilities.
-Original Message-
From: Gary Barnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 issues with process
that didn't work either
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K - Pop3
Are you entering his username in the proper format?
(domain\nt_id\mailbox_alias)
-Original
There are certainly situations in which an inbox rule may be appropriate. I
think Arch's original post in this thread mentioned something about them in
fact. But for $vbc a rules wizard solution does have a few scalability
issues. Not everyone is as big or wildly successful as Getty Images
Exchange's POP3 will respond OK to a username of hubnlkjtenlkjbt.
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K - Pop3
haven't tried that, I don't have any other pop clients setup
nice...so even if it is telling me that the user is ok, it may not be. Then it may be
a problem of exchange not getting the changes of the newly created account yet.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:50 PM
To: Exchange
Nope, it's not the Dell. I have one and don't have those issues either...
:P
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging.
Haven't seen that and I'm
Does the Pop3 account name = Exchange alias ?
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K - Pop3
Silly little problem with authenticating to my E2K server through a POP3
connection.
I
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
