We are using SimpleSync (www.cps-systems.com) to replicate the GAL between 2
orgs until we can do a proper integration.
Ant.
-Original Message-
From: Al Suckoo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 August 2002 20:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help with Seperate Organizations
I
You're talking about the actual files - yes? Nothing will backup the
physical files - when you do a backup of the IS, that is backing up the
*data* in the files, which is what you want. You don't want to back up the
files.
As for circular logging, once you are backing up the IS (again, don't
I realize it works for some people. It's not for me. Here's why:
1) They take a lng time. At my last position, the priv.edb on
several Exchange servers was huge with several mailboxes exceeding 2GB.
Backup windows of 'July' is not acceptible nor necessary.
2) Brick Level break SIS in the
Dear List,
Today, our senior executive's received Illegal/unsolicited email with the name of one
of our senior executive. His name was used on free web based email service
(www.brain.com.pk). My question is how can I trace the culprit.
Help in this regard is really appreciated.
Thanks
I would like to thank Ed Crowley for having that wonderful site up, I was
able to find the information I needed in regards to Changing the Service
Attendant Account. The White Paper was truly magnificent. I had some rough
bumps last night but I was able to get around them and poof the exchange
Dear List Gurus,
I have been asked to design and implement a solution with Exchange and
SQL in a Windows 200 Adv Server Cluster. (Each of them running on a
separate node, with fail-over in case one node goes down). I've already
worked with this kind of solution but never implemented one right
Hi Ed,
Not rights issues as other servers can run setups/upgrades.
The problem was that the server was not resolving the short-name for the
top-level GC. Reason unknown as all servers have the same DNS settings
and other servers resolve schema master happily. Added the short-name to
the local
Hi
Is there any tool to repair a damaged mailbox.pab
file. The problem is when a user trys to open his
personal address book, the following message pops up.
One or mroe changes made could not be saved. The file
is either not acessible or is not a personal adddress
book
Eve
Look at the headers of the email
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 August 2002 11:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Unsolicited Email
Dear List,
Today, our senior executive's received Illegal/unsolicited email with
the name of one of our
perhaps that is the problem. I have 4 recipient policies, the default policy and then
one for each of the 3 domains. My primary domain, penncolor.com has a priority of 1
and default has the lowest. Each policy applies the approiate primary smtp address
depending upon which OU a users
In exchange admin, get to the property pages for a server. Select the
advanced tab. Select Consistency Adjuster. Check Remove unknown user
accounts from public folder permissions, select all inconsistencies and
click OK.
-Original Message-
From: Wayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Excellent workup, William. Could you save that as HTML and put it up next to your
Computer Associates um... exposé page?
Also, I like to keep this link handy in my bookmarks list:
http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL
I should be more clear on the problem. I moved 2 users, myself and someone
I will call user. When I moved myself I was able to get mail from all
users in the office and I could send to all users in the office. I was
able to send mail to my hotmail account and was able to receive mail from
my
I am sure there is an easy answer to this but I havent found it in the MS KB
. . .
In my EXCHSRVR\IMCDATA\LOG dir I am getting log files with pretty big sizes
lately that are chewing up my drive space.
L0007.log, etc. FIle sizes ranging from 1 GB+ to 200 MB, etc. I stopped
and started the IMC
Thanks, William. You've cleared it up for me. Doubt if I can get them to
change it, but at least I have some info to take to them.
As someone on this list mentioned before, lawyers run the IT dept. :(
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
All,
I am currently installing Exchange server 2000 and have prepared all the
systems as stated. When it gets to the part installing message collaboration
and installing replication service database the progress bar has been in the
same place for 20 minutes, how long does this part of the
The installation log includes what is below. Should I wait for this to
finish or will it go on indefinately? It is sleeping for 65 seconds now!!
What could be wrong?
[13:19:28] Unescaped string is (WCVA Caerphilly)
[13:19:28] Attempting to add the replica for the /o=W.C.V.A./ou=WCVA
I've seen a similar thing with initialising the SRS (I think) when it
kept incrementing the sleep value up to 300 before bombing out. IIRC,
my problem was due to name resolution, so you might like to check this.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Mark Condron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I asked a question about PFadmin yesterday that was unanswered so I will
make the scope a little wider. Is their a way to automate the process of
rehoming public folders to a new server? Can't use the Exchange Admin
program because the sub-folders aren't necessarily located in our site,
can't use
don't worry about the ram - I'm running a exch55 sp4 sbs4.5 sp6a server
on a PII 350 with 256Mb ram and disk space of 2gb and 10gb (only approx
30 users tho)!
tell him not to worry!
btw - this server is being made redundant in 3 weeks !
no trouble with it yet
-Original Message-
From: Ed
I find the problem. The mailbox on the Subscriber side was hidden.
After un-hiding it, all is well!
Thanks.
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 5:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: InterOrg Replication
First you need to read and fully understand RFC821 and 822.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 5:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Unsolicited Email
Dear List,
Today, our senior executive's received
SMTP domains can span multiple routing groups.. your issues sound like they
could possibly be directory related. Can users see the entire GAL? Do they
receive NDRs? What do those NDRs say? Errors in the event viewer?
-Original Message-
From: Marko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Apparently we shouldn't ask...
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 1:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K O/S Upgrade
Why ?
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Melissa Burgess
Can't tell 5000 users not to send mail while connected to exchange, defeats
the purpose of exchange as a mail server. Yes, I think it's obvious I am
using it as a mail server, mail just has to go through a particular path of
unix machines to get there. that path is preempted by a couple
Karon, if based solely on the fact that your Exchange server's store.exe
process is using 75% or more of the available memory this systems manager
thinks that the server will die within 60 days he is proof positive that
certifications alone don't mean squat.
-Original Message-
From:
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Help stopping local delivery
Can't tell 5000 users not to send mail while connected to exchange,
defeats
the purpose of exchange as a
Great answer!
--
From: Chris Scharff
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 9, 2002 09:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Help stopping local delivery
if it was that easy, I would. :-)
OK. Tell the users not to send mail while
Oh, just run Exchange Optimizer and force it to use no more than 256MB of
RAM.
Then get the boss to explain to all the users why it is running slower.
Phil ;-)
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original
Check the FAQ link below.
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 8:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC Log Files
I am sure there is an easy answer to this but I havent found it in the MS
KB
. . .
In my
Directory replication delay?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 8:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Communications failure
I should be more clear on the problem. I moved 2 users, myself and someone
I will
What type of errors do users get when trying to send to this person when on
the new server?
--
From: Chris Scharff
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Friday, August 9, 2002 10:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Communications failure
Directory
Is there a way to customize the warnings that Exchange 5.5 sends out to warn
users for storage limits?
TIA!
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Running OWA 2000 version, Has anyone ran into problems with Macintosh
and/or PC clients connecting to the web url for your OWA? Any problems with
different OS levels, Mac 9 or 10 or any version of
windows.
Ron
_
List posting FAQ:
for today, I must use the list for a test.
Hate me
Flame me
Whatever.
I'll deal with it later.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
B.M.A
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: flame me some other time
for today, I must use the list for a test.
Hate me
Flame me
Whatever.
I'll deal with it later.
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm 3.35
-Original Message-
From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Storage Limit warnings
Is there a way to customize the warnings that Exchange 5.5 sends
You need to send your e-mail address.that way I could send you
goatse
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT)
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: flame me some other time
for today, I
Do you have your AD DNS as the root same as your E-mail domain?
- Original Message -
From: Wendy Reetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: Help stopping local delivery
Can't tell 5000 users not to send mail
::Singing::
Flame me baby one more time. Once is never enough with a geek like you.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: flame me some other time
for today, I must use the list for a
Are you having some issues?
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Issues
Running OWA 2000 version, Has anyone ran into problems with Macintosh
and/or PC clients connecting to
Why, yes I am.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Issues
Are you having some issues?
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Feel free to share!
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Issues
Why, yes I am.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
What does your Exchange administrator say?
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Issues
Why, yes I am.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
Original question:
Does anyone know how to preempt local delivery?
If the server isn't authoratative for a domain I don't want it accepting
local deliver if there happens to be an smtp address defined for one of
the
exchange user.
If the exchange server is authoritative for
Outlook XP
Is there anyway to instruct outlookXP to not do the *synchronization* it
does againtsthe exchange server we are using dial-up and full exchnage
client...that blue bar indiactor is really frozzen oor work...seems that is
trying to referesh every single item of the Public folders and
Working with E2k Sp2, Win2k SP2. I have a userbase of sales people on the road that
use POP3 to retreive their mail from the server. When they work with customers they
use Journal entries for each customer. Each interaction with a customer they create a
new entry. They then foward the
I have a problem with OWA in Exchange 2000, SP2 that has me stumped. Recently we
noticed that when you click the Logoff button from Outlook Web Access, the page
generates an error HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error rather than the logoff page. It
happens to all users regardless of security
You seem to be the only one getting the on behalf ofs.
)
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:06 PM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: flame me some other time
Subject: RE: flame me some other
Original question:
Does anyone know how to preempt local delivery?
If the server isn't authoratative for a domain I don't want it accepting
local deliver if there happens to be an smtp address defined for one of
the
exchange user.
If the exchange server is authoritative for
local delivery delivers a message to users on the server it was sent from?
correct?
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:52 PM
Subject: RE: Help stopping local delivery
Original
lawyers run the IT dept.
I shall start lawyering.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Elias, Delores
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 6:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
Thanks, William. You've cleared it
Ok,
now I have another problem. I have 2 Exch sites connected via site
connectors. I recently installed a new Exchange server into one of the
sites(Cayman Islands) and ever since that any mailbox that has been migrated
to the new server is unable to send messages to the remote(London) site.
Thank you this is exactly what I was looking for.
You're talking about the actual files - yes? Nothing will backup the
physical files - when you do a backup of the IS, that is backing up the
*data* in the files, which is what you want. You don't want to back up the
files.
As for circular
Do you really have the bandwidth to warrant Site Connectors between London
and the Cayman Islands? What errors are you seeing in the App Logs? What
errors do the users get when sending to the newly migrated mailboxes?
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Al Suckoo
Reply To:
You guys are brutal on here to newcomers. I've been in this business for
11 years and only been doing Exchange for 1 year. Cut me some slack
please.
And I am right behind you Erik on Don't do BLBs and do a little reading.
Jeesh. If you have been on this list even just lurking in the
Company picnic
At Lake Shawnee tomorrow
Getting drunk tonight
Bought Lord of the Rings
Watching my new DVD
TV is too small
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Sorry, shouldn't have sent so quickly that last letter.
What I mean by specific route is that when you send an e-mail to any domain,
it checks the MX record on the authoritative server sends the message to
that machine. If that machine isn't the final destination it does final
delivery to the
Any one ever run through the steps in Q282230?
After I did, it resolved my HTTP/1.1 503 error
but now the page is diplayed w/ out the great graphics, it's just a direct
directory list.
It works as it should, authenication, you see the mailboxes, then your
folders and your E-mail are listed as a
In a manner of speaking, yes. Can that be prevented? Yes.
Option 1: Good design.
Option 2: Programming.
Since option 1 seems to be out of the question, I'll happily offer to bid on
option 2.
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Reetz
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 8/9/2002 11:59 AM
Do you have your AD DNS as the root same as your E-mail domain?
...gracious I'm so new at this stuff, I'm not totally sure I know what that
means. sorry for the ignorance. :-( But I'll try to explain a little
more...
The e-mail domain for the exchange box is exch.mydomain.com. the e-mail
good design can get it to not deliver to the machine it was sent from? Can
you explain that?
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 1:26 PM
Subject: RE: Help stopping local delivery
In a
It can be pretty brutal here. But you wont learn more anywhere. A number of
folk here are the cream of the crop Exchange admins. We also have a few
cream of the crap ones too, just to even things out.
-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August
Years of experience has nothing to do with knowing what RTFM means.
-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
You guys are brutal on here to newcomers. I've
I've Read The F.n Manual but it doesn't go into the detail that I can
get on this forum. We're a unique environment here we probably don't do
anything the way we're supposed to.
Years of experience has nothing to do with knowing what RTFM means. =20
-Original Message-
From:
When I subbed this list some 2 years ago. I was promptly told to read the
FAQ. I did, and thus avoided the brutality you speak of.
--steve
-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 1:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Your setup is overcomplicated. Nonetheless, the way that is typically
done is to give all your recipients a reply address in the
exch.mydomain.com domain and have the Unix box rewrite the from and
reply addresses to the mydomain.com address. I'm not a Unix geek, so I
can't tell you how to do
Did you really install that server into the site? That is, as opposed
to installing it with just the same organization and site name but not
joining the site?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original
Outlook only synchronizes public folders that are (1) in the user's
Favorites, and (2) the user has asked to be synchronized.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I get them on replying, but I see the address when viewing the message.
Now stop sending tests to the list, you twit! [1]
[1] tongue firmly in cheek
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
Patient: Doctor, it hurts when I do this.
Doctor: Well, don't do that!
POP sucks. They should be using offline folders. Educate your users!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From:
Sorry, shouldn't have sent so quickly that last letter.
What I mean by specific route is that when you send an e-mail to any
domain,
it checks the MX record on the authoritative server sends the message to
that machine. If that machine isn't the final destination it does final
delivery
Course that will hopelessly confuse users and make the overall messaging
infrastructure that much more complex to administer and maintain. It also
won't prevent users from mailing each other locally simply by selecting a
recipient out of the GAL.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley
Our SMTP connector is looping unresolved recipients between our smart
host and itself. We have one SMTP connector accepting incoming and
outgoing internet mail. We also have one IMC in the same site. Mail
will come in for a bad user and the 2k server will try to hand it off to
the IMC and then
I don't have a site. Perhaps you're referring to http://www.swinc.com,
which is Andy Webb's site?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
That's one option. There are more:
1. Compaq LDAP Directory Synchronization Utility (LDSU)
2. Microsoft Metadirectory Server
3. SimpleSync
4. MS Mail Dirsync (unsupported by Microsoft, but is supposed to work)
5. InterOrg tool
6. Active Directory Connector (in interorganizational mode)
7.
Buy and read Paul Robichaux's Exchange 5.5 book.
Unique environment often means arrogantly ignorant. You have some
work ahead of you--not just for this problem but for the many to come.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked
Well, honestly because your question is stupid.
Couple of points. Not saying you are stupid, simply that the question is.
Not your fault necessarily that you are currently in the position of having
to try and make this work, but I think stepping back and looking at the big
picture is the best
I didn't say it was optimal, just how it was done in other places that
insist on silly mail routing.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Did you read the whitepapers? The minute amount of information Tristan gave
you isn't enough knowledge.
-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 1:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
Thank
Yo.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 1:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
It can be pretty brutal here. But you wont learn more
anywhere. A number of
folk here are the cream
1. Use Exchange Admin to connect to a server in the site where the public
folder resides and replicate the folders to your server.
2. Contact someone that can admin the Exchange site and have them
replicate the public folders to your Exchange server.
3. Use Outlook to synchronize the contents
I have no idea whether this will work or not, but try having them Save
As the journal entry and save it to disk as an .RTF or .MSG file. Compose
an email message and attach the file.
Working with E2k Sp2, Win2k SP2. I have a userbase of sales people on =
the road that use POP3 to retreive
So, mail sent from exchange box would have to pit stop at the unix box on
it's way out to the world, that's what you're saying? then during that
pit stop you can modify the reply to address? Well, to do that, rewrite the
reply to addresses at the Unix side, might not be a difficult option (I'm
First, ignore the advice of reading the RFC's and headers. If an
individual signed up for a web email service such as Hotmail or Yahoo! or
brain.com.pk under false pretenses then you will have to contact the
provider to see if they can help you track down the abuser. All the
headers are going to
Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Unsolicited Email
First, ignore the advice of reading the RFC's and headers.
Here's a slipstick article link.
http://www.slipstick.com/problems/scanpst.htm
Short and sweet is that it states that while there are tools for repairing
PST files, there is nothing comparable for PAB files. A quick search of
the web did not turn up anything to dispute this.
Your best bets are
Don't know about books, but here are some links to get you started:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/exchange2000/deploy/depovg/exonclus.asp
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;[LN];Q219264
Greetings
the progress reporting this is the one that is frozzen our dial-up
clients...anyway to get rid of this? that happens to all users even the one
that do not have any access to PFs.
There was no progress reporting in Outlook2000 clients, users were using
same laptops...
thanks,
-er
Lake Shawnee is nice
I grew up in Topeka
Have a Boulevard
Exchange Two Thousand
Moved everyone today
Used ADMT
- Original Message -
From: Steven A. Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:24 PM
Subject: Haiku Friday
I told it to join an existing site when installing
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Site problem
Did you really install that server into the site? That is, as opposed
to
While not quite HaikuI was looking through a AWK faq... and this was the
third entry..it seemed to ring out.as not to plagerize...
Ref: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/computer-lang/awk/faq/
snip
Read the FAQ, and the materials pointed to by it, and if you can't find an
answer there, by all
It has worked so far for 2 years, and we have upgraded our Internet Access
to T1 since then, no errors are being logged, but the message comes back
saying the MTA was too busy, weird thing is email is now flowing in both
directions witout me having done anything.
I guess it could have been a
Glad to hear it. Have a great weekend.
-Original Message-
From: Al Suckoo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Site problem
It has worked so far for 2 years, and we have upgraded our Internet Access
to T1 since then, no
So, mail sent from exchange box would have to pit stop at the unix box on
it's way out to the world, that's what you're saying? then during that
pit stop you can modify the reply to address? Well, to do that, rewrite
the
reply to addresses at the Unix side, might not be a difficult option
It's Friday
I called in sick
Went golfing instead
Didn't shoot well
Didn't care
Am getting drunk now
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Allhiser
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Haiku Friday
I've heard of at least one group working on a new calendaring/ resource
solution for Exchange... what squirrelly things are happening and if you
have a wish list for functionality, what does it include?
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Except the one that provides the originating IP address. But those are
hard to track.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
This progress bar is new to Outlook 2002. You have some sort of a
connectivity or name resolution problem.
See Q293650. I'm definitely bookmarking this one--it was hard to find!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
So, mail sent from exchange box would have to pit stop at the unix box
on
it's way out to the world, that's what you're saying? then during
that
pit stop you can modify the reply to address? Well, to do that, rewrite
the
reply to addresses at the Unix side, might not be a difficult
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
