I am curious Jay, why is a drive letter change discomforting?
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Kulsh
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 2:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Thanks for replying. I am planning to do a full backup as
Using exch 2000 sp3 with backupexec 8.6 for sbs2000:
If I am backing up the microsoft information store but not microsoft
exchange mailboxes or the M: drive then there is no point in
backing up program files\exchsrvr is there? Or should I still backup
the program files\exchsrvr directory but
Dear all,
We have moved a load of mailboxes, some to one server and others to another
server. These are newly installed and newly joined to the site. It seems
that for some of the mailboxes, they no longer allow nominated delegates to
view their calendars. The permissions are there and they are
My personal favorite is getting responses to my replies before I get my own
reply.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's the very real indication we're seeing, at least from an e-commerce
perspective. There are some interesting, service oriented, encryption
options (the AS1 standard) which have been developed to address some of this
need, but that's designed for process-to-process email rather than
Ahh yes... The good old days (of which I'm still a part).
Choose to install the new organization and site, but use the EXACT SAME
organization name that your first site used. Once installed, you can add
site connectivity (either a site connector or an x.400 connector) and a
directory replication
How big are the stores?
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Using exch 2000 sp3 with backupexec 8.6 for sbs2000:
If I am backing up the microsoft information store but not microsoft
exchange
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, at 7:53pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I strongly suspect that HIPAA and e-mail don't mix.
In my opinion, the issue isn't so much e-mail but the fact that most
people want nothing to do with security. They consider it a hassle; an
obstacle to overcome. As long as that
Along with martin I might ask...
1.) Umm What is your total Drive capacity?
2.) Of the total capacity how much is in use?
3.) IF say IN USE is say =/less then 40/80GB I would think it should fit.
Note: Remember compression is a funny thing and often is not going to work
the way you may
Absolutely. Ease of Use and Security have traditionally been at opposite
ends of the same continuum. It would be nice if someone would fix (break?)
that.
Of course, S/MIME capability is built into Outlook and some other clients,
but the key management process is a PITA, and not getting any
The powers that be have decided to move to AD 2003 this summer after rolling
out AD and Ex2k last summer to our students.
I have checked MS website to see if there are any known issues in doing this
as some of the powers think that there are conflicts with this upgrade.
Has anyone done this type
Do not back up M: as it can corrupt the store.
Do not back up exchsrvr\*data directories as all the data those
directories is transient or the files are open. The only exception is
exchsrvr\kmsdata (if you use it), which you can only back up
successfully if you shut down the Key Management
Well, since W2k3 isn't released yet, that's not an easy question to answer.
However, those that are running it in their labs probably have. I have
three servers and two workstations in my home lab and the upgrade was pretty
simple. Although, my home network is not a complex as most business
In addition to Peter's comments the outcmd.dat file should not be available
on a network share through Windows 2000 Application Data redirection. This
is because the first instance will lock the file open, the second incidence
will try to open the file each time you open a message and will take 15
FYI, Exchange 2000 will NOT run on Windows 2003 server.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 7:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Well, since W2k3 isn't released yet, that's not an easy question to answer.
However, those that are
Yes it will. I had it running at home. Why would Microsoft do that?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
FYI, Exchange 2000 will NOT run on Windows 2003 server.
-Original
No idea, if you turn up protocol logging does it show any errors? Why port
26 again?
On 3/26/03 0:29, Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No.
Let me refresh the scenario again. I have configured default smtp virtual
server to send all outbound mails on port TCP 26, I have created a
But you can run it in a mixed Windows2000/2003 environment installed on a
W2k Server.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:49 AM
Subject: RE: AD 2003 and Ex2k
FYI, Exchange 2000
I thought Exchange 2000 supported online backup of the KMS.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 26 March 2003 15:25
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Quick question re backup
Subject: RE: Quick question re backup
Do not back up M:
E2k installed on Windows 2003 is not supported. Whether you can install it
or not is a different story.
- Original Message -
From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:58 AM
Subject: RE: AD 2003 and Ex2k
Yes it
Let me rephrase that. MS will not support E2K on Windows 2003 server.
Exch 2003 Release Notes: While Exchange 2000 SP2 and later is supported in
an environment with Windows Server 2003 domain controllers and global
catalog servers, Exchange 2003 is the first version of Exchange that is
Aye
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 8:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
But you can run it in a mixed Windows2000/2003 environment installed on a
W2k Server.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL
Well they should support it. It worked fine. Oh well another way for
them to make money.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Let me rephrase that. MS will not support E2K on Windows
For clarification check out
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;810591
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 March 2003 15:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AD 2003 and Ex2k
Aye
-Original
I know someone who feels the same way about Windows 98.
- Original Message -
From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:03 AM
Subject: RE: AD 2003 and Ex2k
Well they should support it. It worked fine. Oh well
Read the KB article Paul posted. It will give you the details.
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 8:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Well they should support it. It worked fine. Oh well another way for
them to make money.
HA HA HA HA HA
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I know someone who feels the same way about Windows 98.
- Original Message -
From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Thanks Ed - that answers my question
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 March 2003 15:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick question re backup
Do not back up M: as it can corrupt the store.
Do not back up exchsrvr\*data directories as all
Wouldn't know, I'm running E2k3 on W2k3... :P
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
FYI, Exchange 2000 will NOT run on Windows 2003 server.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don
I use ADSI for these things. The proxyAddresses attribute is
an array.
Code I've written manipulates the entries in the array. Be
sure not to
put the same address in twice--ADSI doesn't like that and
you'll get the
typical useless error message.
Do you ever encounter problems when the
Corrupted mail store?
-Original Message-
From: Lloyd, D (Dave) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 March 2003 03:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can't move Mailboxes between Stores
OK, I have an issue which I'm hoping someone can point in the right
direction...even if
Just wanted to Thank all who suggested something or other.
I finally resolved this issue and thought would share with this list. I had to
re-install SMTP on the Routing Master Exchange server and that resolved the problem,
although this service was running fine but still this server wasn't
Hi,
I have a few users who map to a single mailbox. With that said I have
granted them 'Full mailbox rights' to that mailbox however when they
send mail as that mailbox they are told they 'do not have permissions'
I then went and gave them 'send on behalf' rights and that resolved it.
I was
Hello,
E2K, W2K SP3 + security fixes
That use to work for us too! But last weekend I applied the Store Roll-up Hot fix for
E2K post-SP3, and many W2K OS fixes, and we've started getting the same behavior as
you see.
What Exchange and OS level are you at?
Brent
-Original Message-
I am failing at getting a seamless login by entering the user credentials in
the URL.
I can get it to work on another environment w/o the domain. This environment
uses DOMAIN\username then passowrd.
System is E2K SP3, front-end, back-end topology.
What is the syntax for entering login
I've been scouring a peculiar issue with preferences and signature files in
Outlook2K2 and Terminal Server. I have gone to the point where I even
deleted profiles to resolve this but for what ever reason, Terminal Server
looses Outlook2K2 (With all patch's 10.4712.4219) signature files (located
Are they supposed to have send as or send on behalf of rights? If it's
the former, do they have that right granted explicitly?
On 3/26/03 11:28, Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a few users who map to a single mailbox. With that said I have
granted them 'Full mailbox
Are you using roaming profiles?
Different versions of Outlook?
I have seen that issue occasionally.
- Original Message -
From: Finch Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:35 PM
Subject: Exchange and Terminal Server
I've
You can specify the default Domain in IIS, or in the System manager if
it's E2K. As for the syntax for user and pass in the URL -- I haven't
tried it with OWA, but if it works it should be https://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where do you input it in System Mgr? I've seen it in IIS but with our OWA, we still
have to log on in the form domain\user name.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Patrick R. Sweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:51
Dig down to the server object, then to the exchange virtual directory.
Right click it and specify the domain. I believe you need to specify
the W2K domain.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003
We have sort of a weird issue going on here and I am wondering if anyone
else has seen this. We have an EX2000 server that runs smooth for some
users and poorly for others. All the clients are different ranging from
97-2002 so I have taken the client out of the picture. We have changed
NICs and
Hello,
The follow-up replier experiencing similar problems:
E2K SP3 + Store Roll-Up Hot fix 811853
W2K SP3 + All Critical Security hotfixes
Prior to the above patches and fixes being applied: Users that had FULL Mailbox
Access given to them for another Mailbox were able to SEND AS that other
Binding order is one thing to look at.
From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Possible hardware issue?
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 15:31:15 -0500
We have sort of a weird issue going on here and I
Mike:
Depending on how paranoid your security team is, moving to AD
can be very intense. As other people here have said, read the
whitepapers, hire a good consultant or two to help you through this.
Build an isolated test bed to test theories on, cause once it goes
production, there's no
Comes back with You must use IIS Admin to manage this Virtual Server's properties.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Patrick R. Sweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Entering
Comes back with You must use IIS Admin to manage this
Virtual Server's properties.
Then there is your answer. Set the default domain in IIS
-Kevin
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Hi,
Is there a way, besides speaking with each user, to change the default
value of the 'Free/Busy' setting in MS Outlook's calendar to a higher
value? I believe the default is 2 months and I would like to change it
to 4. Users try to schedule a meeting three + months in advance and all
they
No, not roaming, that's the weird thing about it. On Terminal Server, they
are all 'local'.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange and Terminal Server
Are you using roaming
Thanks, Roger. It certainly makes sense, and I will give it a try!
Ahh yes... The good old days (of which I'm still a part).
Choose to install the new organization and site, but use the EXACT SAME
organization name that your first site used. Once installed, you can add
site connectivity
When users use OWA it asks them for aMS Office CD-Rom, especially when I try
to compose a new e-mail message. This is described in Q257886.
Is there a way around this? Besides installing the HTML files!
If not has anyone coded an installer to install these needed files?
Thanks,
- John Q Jr.
No, no, no...
If you set it in IIS, Exchange will come around and whack it sooner or
later. This setting must be change in System Manager.
Drill down through Administrative Groups, Servers, Protocols,
HTTP, Exchange Virtual Server, and right click on the Exchange
virtual directory. Select
IIRC the change can be scripted. Yep.. Just checked. The registry key name
is FBPublishRange.
On 3/26/03 14:36, Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way, besides speaking with each user, to change the default
value of the 'Free/Busy' setting in MS Outlook's calendar to a
Can some show me where I need to start looking
We I connect my laptop to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I could not get to my web page with
www.domain.com but I could type in the IP address. When I use a dail-up
account I was able to use www.domain.com. Could this be a DNS problem?
Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL
Hi all,
I am just full of questions today:
Is there a way to set a timeout so connections to OWA breaks? I have
the connection timeout set to 900 seconds however it does not seem to be
working.
Thanks,
Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
ISO - Intel Systems
Ph#: 925-685-6161
In E2K? Notsomuch.
On 3/26/03 16:46, Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am just full of questions today:
Is there a way to set a timeout so connections to OWA breaks? I have
the connection timeout set to 900 seconds however it does not seem to be
working.
Third party products provide this ... like SessionGuard at http://www.messageware.com
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 5:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA and Timeout For Users
In E2K? Notsomuch.
On
If its a backbone switch hopefully its new enough and had enough money spent on it
that it is also a managed switch. If you telnet / web-browse into it and check the
error logging and suchlike on the port the bad exchange server is on, is the switch
whining about anything on that port?
Are
Hi,
I am on the phone with PPS now, Premier support - woooh, and will
see if they have any info. I will keep us, you, posted.
Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
ISO - Intel Systems
Ph#: 925-685-6161
www.pmigroup.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: MS
No, I'm saying the Domain can be specified in IIS and then it doesn't
need to be in the URL. This, of course, assumes something about the
target environment.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 3:53
How is the domain listed? Is it the NT 4 equivalent name, or is the
DNS style 2000 name?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 3:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Entering login
Hear yee yee:
Here is the fix to the
811853_enu_i386.exe
'full mailbox rights' issue.
Upgrade to the lastest post SP3 roll-up. A large roll-up ~24megs.
Thanks,
Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
ISO - Intel Systems
Ph#: 925-685-6161
www.pmigroup.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW, There is a critical piece of info you need to know before installing
this. Pay close attention...
From Lockergnome:
Dozens of fixes are included in the latest Exchange 2000 Post-SP3 Rollup
package, several of which address performance issues that may be of
interest. What jumps out at me in
Hear yee yee:
Here is the fix to the
811853_enu_i386.exe
'full mailbox rights' issue.
Upgrade to the lastest post SP3 roll-up. A large roll-up ~24megs.
Thanks,
Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
ISO - Intel Systems
Ph#: 925-685-6161
www.pmigroup.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey,
One last registry question - is there a way to 'disable' the 'send on
behalf' prompt that constantly comes up when doing batch emails? If you
already have 'send on behalf rights' would that work or is there a reg
setting to disable it completely?
Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
ISO
The send on behalf of prompt? You mean the Outlook Security Model Guard?
Write your code so it doesn't trigger it.
On 3/26/03 18:31, Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
One last registry question - is there a way to 'disable' the 'send on
behalf' prompt that constantly comes up
Hey:
Just got off the phone with MS PSS. If you install the 811853 OR the
813840 post SP3 roll-up you WILL have to specify the 'Send on behalf
rights'. The + thing is you can remove the roll-up through 'Add/remove
Programs' and you will go back to normal unless you really need that
post sp3 fix
Hi,
Anyone else doing this:
http://martijnjongen.com/eng/orfilter/default.htm
Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
ISO - Intel Systems
Ph#: 925-685-6161
www.pmigroup.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:
And that has to do with Exchange how?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:31 PM
To:
He was looking for us to Exchange answers with him... ;o)
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 9:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
And that has to do with Exchange how?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
That attribute contains all addresses, not just SMTP ones. I have
scripted the addition of custom addresses, like X500, for example.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it possible that someone Telneted into the IMC and sent the message to the Sales
Manager from his boss? It's really not that hard to spoof like that from the inside.
Thanks,
Patrick Scribner, MCSE
DBA
Westwood College
720-524-5137
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm trying to set up a public folder in Outlook. There are no public
folders already there. How would I set this up?
Thanks
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
This may seem like a weird question for this situation:
Are the clients in the same DHCP subnet?
Are the exchange servers in the same subnet?
I have experienced similar sorts of issues with a DC / file server...
MP
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I deleted and re-created them to rule that out but no joy
-Original Message-
From: Mark Dewell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 27 March 2003 3:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can't move Mailboxes between Stores
Corrupted mail store?
-Original Message-
Any chance you might still have some code floating around that you would be
willing to share
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 27 March 2003 1:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Change the primary SMTP address using VBscript
That
Not that it has anything to do with the list but, what the heck... If
you can't get there by name but you can get there by IP address, it's a
DNS issue - TCP-IP 101... Of course it could be a severely misguided
VLAN issue too so you're on your own on this one unless the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tech
For disclaimer MS gave some articles which I followed exactly, in one the article they
wrote the procedure to add second smtp and change the port in outbound connection of
default smtp to 26.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
No even the attachments are not been received.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 5:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Second SMTP
Do you by any chance get an attachment on the recipient end when you
That is exactly what I did to last week. I installed, on both of our
cluster nodes, the post SP3 storage patch/fix.
Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
ISO - Intel Systems
Ph#: 925-685-6161
www.pmigroup.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange List
80 matches
Mail list logo
