Ok...slight problem here.
O/S - Win2k, SP2
Exch - 5.5, SP4+
Situation: MTS-Out is so clogged with outbound NDR's to spammers, that when
I open the 5.5 Exchange Admin Console and attempt to look at the Outbound
awaiting conversion queue of the IMS connector, the console just freezes.
Had this
Why don't you two post the complete error message, along with the Error
Code?
A quick search of the MSKB turned up this article:
Exstensible Storage Engine 98 Error Codes 0 to -1048
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;266361Product=exch2
003
(although I couldn't get to the
Just because he is getting 4000 NDR's an hour still doesn't indicate that he
is an open relay. It simply means that someone spamming his domain name is
trying to brute-force the spam through in mass quantities (probably ~50,000
at a time) by appending every combination they can think of, to the
Just because he is getting 4000 NDR's an hour still doesn't indicate that he
is an open relay. It simply means that someone spamming his domain name is
trying to brute-force the spam through in mass quantities (probably ~50,000
at a time) by appending every combination they can think of, to the
It also works in reverse:
1) spammer sends messages to users in your org from
[EMAIL PROTECTED], which doesn't exist.
2) many many many recipients in your domain do not exist.
3) Your mail system spends the next three days trying to send the NDR bounce
to the perceived sender [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4)
I've got just one question...
Is Greg a reincarnation of Drew Nicholson? There's just about about as much
chance of getting substantiated proof from either one of them, they both
tend to drone on incessantly in circular arguments and you'll never win an
argument with either of them. You will
Actually, degree DOES equal title.
One day, I am just ordinary old Jim Blunt. The next day Washington State
Univ. bestows an honorary doctorate in Computer Engineering, due to some
mythical contributions I have made to the industry.
My signature would now read:
DR. James Blunt, Computer
Eric,
Based on what I have read of your posts in the last few days, I have a
question. It would appear that you have been granted the money you need to
upgrade the infrastucture and Exchange to what is needed. If that is the
case, why would you order Win2000 and Exchange 2000, when you could go
John,
Could I suggest keeping questions related to this topic online, as there are
probably several of us that would be interested in the answers to any
questions you may have, as they may be the same questions someone else has
but is too shy to ask.
Thanks,
Jim
-Original Message-
Novell connects Linux desktop users to Microsoft Exchange 2003
12/4/2003
http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/2003/0312040815.asp?A=HOMEO=FPIN
http://tinyurl.com/xsea
Novell today announced support for Microsoft Exchange 2003 via its Ximian
Connector for Microsoft Exchange. Ximian
Can't read it...subscriber only article.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 6:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sending meeting requests to external Exchange/Outlook users
So what don't you understand?
The To: address was spoofed and you were added to the Bcc: section, so
your address won't show up in the headers. If you take a look at the NDRs
in your Admin mailbox, you will see an NDR for the address indicated below.
It's spam, pure and simple...delete it or
Dude...
Quit snipping the conversation...people would like to be able to see what
the heck you are commenting on or replying to, without having to scroll thru
their archives to find your e-mail. We all have full-time jobs as well and
don't have the time to be messing with that kind of nonsense.
Martin,
This first link may be the answer to your problem...it's what I plan on
going to in the near future. The second link is an option, if you choose to
wait as long as six months.
Call Forward Service Has Many Advantages - Cingular:
But you still have to use landline service to have this.
I interpret this as simple call forwarding made simpler.
Maybe I am missing something.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Andy,
Are you saying that after a 30 minute period of inactivity on the part of
the user, that the .pst file file handle will close itself, allowing the
file to be backed up correctly?
Or are you saying that after 30 minutes of attempting to back them up, the
open file handle closes, thereby
Andy,
Are you saying that after a 30 minute period of inactivity on the part of
the user, that the .pst file file handle will close itself, allowing the
file to be backed up correctly?
Or are you saying that after 30 minutes of attempting to back them up, the
open file handle closes, thereby
-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 10:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
Andy,
Are you saying that after a 30 minute period of inactivity on the part of
the user, that the .pst file file handle will close itself
, but, yea,
something like that. Or I could be completely wrong. Its just something that
I kinda recall from the back of my mind. Theres not much back there.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 10:56 AM
To: Exchange
OWA inside or outside the firewall?
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Action Cancelled in OWA
Single server environment, Windows Server 2003 running Exchange 2003.
OWA works
And the solution was?
-Original Message-
From: Adams, Kevin C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple Tasks Folders
Well nevermind, I found the solution to this.
K
-Original Message-
From: Adams,
Hilda,
When you create your DL, you want to add the SMTP addresses under the
E-mail addresses tab. The DL will have no members listed under the
General tab.
Therefore, all those SMTP addresses are in your organization, but there is
no one to deliver them to and there is no mailbox to store them
Why don't you just go with a static IP and make sure you have a valid
reverse ptr record?
-Original Message-
From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
When
Well, it looks like Internet .com is flipping out again...just received 14
rejection messages from their server, some from messages over a month old.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Tom,
With the exception of running Win2k SP2 instead of SP4, I'm running the same
setup you are and have not experienced this to date.
I would be interested in the resolution, should you ever figure out what is
causing this.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL
U...because he's spoofing the e-mail address and not really sending from
your e-mail servers?
The RFC's dictate that your mail server accept e-mail from
anyone...regardless of who they are or what naming convention they use.
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
There are several threads dealing with the problems caused by using Outlook
2003 with an Exchange 5.5 system, complete with solutions and links to Q
articles...look them up.
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 7:45 AM
When you had this problem, did you have your OWA server sitting outside the
FW in the DMZ?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with OWA
You know I had this problem at a
.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with OWA
When you had this problem, did you have your OWA server sitting outside the
FW in the DMZ?
-Original Message
Didn't that one girl call you Spanky? ;0)
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 6:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tumbleweed
Mighty Hercules will suffice.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
Dude!!
You're at WSU in Pullman?
I'm in the SE WA State in the Tri-Cities!! Weren't those winds terrible?
Wind like that really plays havoc with our microwave towers.
-Original Message-
From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:59 AM
To: Exchange
Have you read this part of the MS-047 bulletin yet?
You may get a blank message body when opening a message in OWA after the
patch is installed if you have your Windows directory on the OWA Server set
to read only permissions. To solve this problem, please reference the
following Knowledge Base
Were you running at least IE 5.5 SP2 on the OWA server, BEFORE installing
MS-047? If not, then I would bet your problem is described in the second
issue of the Q314532 link below.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2
It's actually /cleanviews (switch leans the other way)
-Original Message-
From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 7:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Missing Meetings in Outlook 2000
A Couple of suggestions:
1) Clean out the forms cache.
It's actually /cleanviews (switch leans the other way)
-Original Message-
From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 7:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Missing Meetings in Outlook 2000
A Couple of suggestions:
1) Clean out the forms cache.
Martin,
Here is the one for OL2003 causing issues with the Ex5.5 store.
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=829418
829418 - XADM: Information Store Intermittently Stops Responding and an
Access Violation Occurs in EcDSDNFromSz
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL
Kim,
I use the Blackhole lookup option from www.samspade.org. It will search
by domain name or IP and will query 15 different RBL's for the information
you supply.
Currently, it would appear that intas.be is on the FiveTen RBL.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL
You don't have a product called Outlook Helpdesk from www.kalmstrom.nu set
up in your PF's by chance, do you?
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Replication Conflicts after applying
Pack 3 Rollup)
The tech guy that was here installed some kind of help desk application. I
don't know what kind it was?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Blunt, James H
(Jim)
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
.
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (713)670-2443
Fax: (713)670-2457
TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Is it the order your rules are firing off in?
Since I don't have OL2003 yet, I'm not sure how this is configured yet, but
can you move the Junk Filters rule to the top of the list, so that it fires
off first?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Don't laugh...some PHB in the UK banned his employees from using e-mail.
Deluged Telecoms Boss Bans Staff E-Mails:
http://tinyurl.com/oif5
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 6:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
No...it won't.
If you save an attachment to an e-mail, located in a PF to your HD and
modify it, you are working on a new copy of the document...not the one sent
in the original e-mail. Then once you are done working on the document, you
reply to the original or post a new message, it is adding
Yep...using OfficeXP at least, I get the following options when I do that:
Do you want to merg changes in 'Blah.doc' back into 'c:\user\blah.doc'?
Yes, No and No, don't ask again
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003
Forgive me for arguing, but I believe the time alloted for guessing that
third factor is even less than indicated below. Of course, by token, I am
referring to what RSA calls a keyfob. Is that what you are referring to
as well?
Here is what I understand to be the process, from reading the
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security
Forgive me for arguing, but I
.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security
Ken / Roger,
I know it's OT, but I have a quick question for you two.
We don't have
I'd argue with you all the way to the IMS server with you on that point!
;0)
Seriously...we get ~100k-150k (This is a conservative estimate) spams/month
on our system. Probably 60-75% of those are from non-existant domains...and
that's just the stuff that gets through.
We get ~250k NDRs/month
Actually, the travesty is that your company is so far behind in the
hardware/software options available when spec'ing out and building a new
computer from your web page.
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 10:24 AM
To: Exchange
I don't know...maybe just create the mailbox?
I'm a Domain Admin / Exchange Admin with full Admin rights on my local
machine, and I couldn't delete one of the standard folders (Inbox, Sent,
Outbox, etc) if I wanted to. If your users can, I would look into the
security settings of the local
It's called a newsgroup and Outlook Express works great for accessing them.
-Original Message-
From: Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Creating an automated Bulletin Board System HELP
THat is the direction
Isn't that permissions/account modification information going to be in the
logs for one of your DC's?
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 6:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
Thanks to
Server - Exchange 5.5 SP4 + hotfixes on Win2k SP2
Workstation - WinXP SP1
I am trying to automagically clean out my admin mailbox from my workstation,
using the Exchange Admin Console. Due to brute force spamming, this mailbox
has over 171k NDR's in it that I don't need or want. They were
We instituted the same policy yesterday. We started diverting all office
format documents as well as .txt files (we had seven instances of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] make it all the way to the mail server, where the AV picked
it, because the attachment was disguised as a .txt file.) for testing. We
told
It's [EMAIL PROTECTED] To learn more about this virus, click on this link:
http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 5:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: mail
Excuse my ignorance what is the vulnerability, do you have a Q article or
security update number from MS. When was the vulnerability reported.
TIA,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 September 2003 15:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Perzactly!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Name change procedure
I generally change the display name to reflect the new name, add an SMTP
address for the new name and then
Erick,
The message is actually very informative. Three things:
1. Did you actually look at where you were trying to send it?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Shouldn't that be @nbr.ORG?
2. The system is telling you it couldn't deliver the message and is
giving you a code to look up.
at or not. So, where can I get this type of information
for a failed message in Exchange? I've check the log file specified in the
default SMTP virtual server, but only appears to contain source/dest IP
addresses.
Thanks,
Erick
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL
-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message failure
Erick,
Have you attempted to Telnet anywhere and send mail manually?
-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL
LOL snicker, snicker:::
'In ready, fire, aim fashion, we must derive a targeted set of actions
(not too few; not too many) and then hold ourselves accountable for
results.'
Typical management kneejerk mindset...pick up the gun, fire at something and
then hope you actually hit the problem
Any one of these get you going in the right direction?
(I am betting it's this first one)
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;817886
817886 - Error Message: Some Items Could Not Be Deleted. They Were Either
Moved or Already Deleted, or Access Was Denied.
I get this error all
Is one of your users using you as an open relay and spamming the heck out of
the Internet?
Has one of your accounts been compromised?
Did someone in the sales group send out a large mailing with a 20 mb file
attached?
Do you have automatic replies to the Internet turned on?
Also, you may want to
.
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 06:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message
: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Ben / Roger,
I can only take a guess that they set the logic up so that the entry
@domainname.com would by default block that domain and every
One of the best SMS discussion lists on the Net is over at
www.myITForum.com, run by Rod Trent.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT :: Other Discussion List
Does
?
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Roger,
I posted this earlier in the thread...maybe you missed it:
Paul Robichaux's Managing MS Exchange
You're being factitious or facetious?
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent Confidential
Hundreds?
Wow! You could rolling in the cash if you just respond!*
Bob Sadler
Roger,
I posted this earlier in the thread...maybe you missed it:
Paul Robichaux's Managing MS Exchange Server, Chapter 8, pg 294, bottom of
the page:
@foe.com - reject mail from foe.com or any subdomain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - reject mail from foe.com, but not a.foe.com
So Nate's response was
months later when I
left the office. It had gone through two revisions cause the products
ordered were no longer available from the vendor.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted
I was S disgusted on Friday with our federal government's anti-virus
policy!!
I had to make a trip over to the passport office in Seattle to get a new
passport for the wife, who was leaving on a 1:23pm flight that day for
Chile. The passport office is an office of the Department of State.
Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert
And this surprises you???
--
From: Blunt, James H (Jim)
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert
You've never tried purchasing a computer for the government have you?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, August 25, 2003 3:30 PM
Mike,
Get a good Exchange book and read it. Paul Robichaux's Managing MS
Exchange Server, Chapter 8, pg 294, bottom of the page:
@foe.com - reject mail from foe.com or any subdomain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - reject mail from foe.com, but not a.foe.com
So...Nate's response was right on the money.
Aye Carumba!
Don, I'd hate to have you or any one of about two dozen other people on this
list mad at me. I think I'd just go unplug my whole network from the
Internet, if I was ever stupid enough to let that happen! :0)
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can rename a file all you want and stick it in a zip file...it still
won't work with Symantec's product.
Symantec is smart enough that it doesn't look just at the extension of the
file in question, it looks inside the properties of the file somehow and
determines what the file type is that
We use four layers of protection as well:
1. Linux gateway doing subject and file type blocking.
2. NAV MSE on the mail servers.
3. NAV CE on all the desktops
4. NAV CE on all the servers.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20,
Well...after three more from that mental midget, I can tell you we won't
have to worry about him/her for awhile.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
Not sure how many of you have seen this...most I would imagine:
http://www.aelita.com/products/ARMEx.htm
For all of you folks that *insist* on doing BLB's, I would think this
product would make you a hero, if it works as advertised.
Regardless of your policy concerning BLB's, has anyone tested
Throw Linux on an old workstation outside your firewall and have it filter
on Blackstone's List of Danger, before it hits your Exchange server.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 2:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
And why in heaven's name would you want to do that? There are several
viruses that send the payload contained inside a .zip file, the worst of
which is the one that a lot of people on this list just got through patching
systems for:
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL
Scenario: Running NT 4.0 SP6a domain, with Win2k SP2 servers (soon to be
SP4) and an Ex5.5 SP4 e-mail system.
Objective: If particular services on a server are still having problems
after restarting more than twice, I want the server to page me via text
e-mail message at my cell phone. I don't
06, 2003 10:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue
So now what are we to do for a week in October?
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue
For all of you that were not satisified with the Exchange content at TechEd
2003, this looks like a pretty good alternative and a pretty good
replacement for MEC:
http://www.winconnections.com/exc/
It has sessions with the following industry heavyweights:
Tony Redmond
Sue Mosher
want to do an online backup of that.Thats not the Exch file path
directory but rather the directory database.
- Original Message -
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:27 PM
Subject: RE: Veritas BE Settings
to see them. I have given the
permissions for default as reviewer and anonymous as none. So I guess in
order to see the folders in the mail drop down list I need add some more
permissions or will it take time to replicate to the users ?? MH
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim
Have you read these Q articles?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;184535
XADM: Removing a Site from an Organization - You will be unable to delete a
Site container using the Microsoft Exchange Server Administrator program. If
you highlight the object and click the Edit menu,
that specifically addresses the *last*
(but also the first! hee hee) server in the site, leaving the site up w/no
servers, etc . . .
- Original Message -
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:29 PM
Subject: RE: Removing
Running Veritas Version 8.60, Rev 3808 against Exchange 5.5 SP4/Win2k SP2.
Due to the loss of people within the company, I am having to start learning
some of the BU stuff. Before, I have just let our BU guy configure it all.
I THINK I know what the settings should be, based on what I have read
Dude...select the option from the web interface that appends the rest of the
message thread to your reply, so that people know what the heck question you
are responding to.
-Original Message-
From: norem0rz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:54 AM
To: Exchange
: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:44 PM
Subject: Veritas BE Settings (Was: Auto Accept Utility stopped working)
Running Veritas Version 8.60, Rev 3808 against Exchange 5.5 SP4/Win2k SP2.
Due to the loss of people
Nope.
But if you really want to be doubly sure, go modify his account and put
yourself as the only account on the mailbox with permissions and set the
Send/Receive limit to zero.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 6:12 AM
To:
Missy,
In an NT 4.0 domain environment?
I have the same environment as Scott has. Ex5.5 SP4 on a Win2000 SP2
machine, running in an NT 4.0 domain. The only difference is that they are
using VPN...we are not at this time.
However, we use one of our Help Desk temps occasionally to break up the
Have you taken a look at the properties of the two mailboxes in question?
You sent it to eight (8) people...six of them got it and two had it bounced.
This would suggest one of two possible motives:
1. These two personnel have reached their Send/Receive limit because their
mailbox is full;
2.
Actually, your EASIEST option if it was Ex5.5, would be to export them out
of Notes to a .csv file, massage the .csv file so that you have them all set
as Custom Recipients, then import them all to the GAL of the Exchange Server
via the Tools / Directory Import... function. Whether the process is
Carmila,
The offending mailbox is listed in the next line down in your error message:
The Information Store was unable to convert the security for /O=BABCOCK
BROWN/OU=BBIMAIL/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CSHELBY into a Windows 2000 Security
Identifier.
In this case, it's the mailbox with an alias of
the
permissions for default as reviewer and anonymous as none. So I guess in
order to see the folders in the mail drop down list I need add some more
permissions or will it take time to replicate to the users ?? MH
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
First off, if doesn't sound like an Exchange issue...it sounds like an
Outlook settings issue.
Second, have you checked User A's account for any delegates? Are there any
other people that have full User priveleges on this mailbox? Have you
checked the Outlook rules or the Tools/Options/E-mail
It sounds like he has the Prohibit send limit that has been applied to his
mailbox.
Have him empty his deleted items and clean out his Journal...either that or
up the quota on his mailbox.
-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003
Well...it doesn't really have any iPaq PDA qualities, but my Nokia 3560
cell phone is perfect for me...but then again, I also have two iPaqs as
well. It does however allow me to send and receive e-mail, text messages,
chat, serves as a voice recorder, has a calendar, to-do list and calculator
and
1 - 100 of 518 matches
Mail list logo
