RE: Internet Mail Issues

2004-01-08 Thread East, Bill
It's a disenheartening thought that for individual broadband access most people now have a choice between the two worst customer-service organizations in the universe, the phone company and the cable company. Crista, you don't want to hear me sing and I didn't mean to criticize you, just to point

RE: doubletake

2004-01-08 Thread East, Bill
A small one can do it, with time and determination. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: doubletake That's a huge dog if it can excrete enough wee to flood a beefy mail

RE: Internet Mail Issues

2004-01-07 Thread East, Bill
Shirley Comcast will allow you to relay your outbound mail through their MXed, reverse-DNSed mailhost, right? If so, just point your Exchange server to relay all outbound mail through them. If not, ditch Comcast. They're not a business-class ISP in my opinion, at least. -- be - MOS Replace

RE: Internet Mail Issues

2004-01-06 Thread East, Bill
From RFC 2821 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable (e.g., mailbox not found, no access, or command rejected for policy reasons) Alamedanet doesn't want to play with your sender for some reason. You might have to call them. -- be - MOS As President I have to go

RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics

2003-12-23 Thread East, Bill
Name a 80's dance band that successfully used the word Parthenogenesis in a song, for $5.38 and an ethical conflict from Microsoft. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's

RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics

2003-12-23 Thread East, Bill
It's Nemesis from Shriekback. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 12:40 PM

RE: Outsourcing email?

2003-12-23 Thread East, Bill
We're starting a filtering service with a local MSP in a week or so. My reasoning came down to economies of scale. They can afford to have a guy watch the recipies full time and tweak them when the spam starts coming through. They can afford to have someone watch the mailflow and make sure that

RE: Outsourcing email?

2003-12-23 Thread East, Bill
port 25 on that server. -- be - MOS The Tree of Learning bears the noblest fruit, but noble fruit tastes bad. -Original Message- From: East, Bill Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outsourcing email? We're starting a filtering service

RE: Header Info

2003-12-19 Thread East, Bill
If I understand the question correctly, your message won't have *his* header information. The SMTP conversation should go something like: Your Server: Yo, here's this email. His server: Yo, back the truck up, talk to the hand coz port 25 ain't listenin' Your server (to you): He wouldn't let me

RE: Best backup software for Exchange

2003-12-12 Thread East, Bill
I love my Gammy but I won't let her sit on a freshly-upholstered sofa. -- be - MOS -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best backup software for Exchange Funny you

RE: Single Use E-Mail?

2003-12-10 Thread East, Bill
David, if you used a Sendmail server (possibly problematic, as it would add an extra layer in your mail delivery, you could write a very simple procmail recipe to do this. Probably the simplest solution would be to send [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and write in the first line in the

RE: Converting w2k dns to bind

2003-12-04 Thread East, Bill
I'd just make sure that your allow-update and allow-transfer settings are copacetic. The DCs, I believe, will get snooty if they can't change the records. -- be - MOS La Brea Tar Pits As seen on the tar channel -Original Message- From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: Dropping an email into the Sent items of a user

2003-11-19 Thread East, Bill
Vas, had you thought about sending them (bcc or duplicate) to a public folder or another mailbox? I could see some advantages; for one, when the staff member leaves the org you still have the public folder record of what was sent. You could even make the public folder read-only so that Bob the

RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls

2003-11-12 Thread East, Bill
That, and having people avoid surfing pr0n. http://www.cheesebucketinathong.com/ makes your modem place collect calls to Liberia then reverses the charges. -- be - MOS Is it NOUVELLE CUISINE when 3 olives are struggling with a scallop in a plate of SAUCE MORNAY? -Original Message-

RE: Bogus Email

2003-10-31 Thread East, Bill
Do they still hang people for impersonating military personnel? Can we get tickets to watch? -- be - MOS The older you get, the better you realize you were. -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 4:00 PM To: Exchange

RE: ActiveX e-mails

2003-09-03 Thread East, Bill
As for is there anything else I believe that the Internet Explorer distribution kit will let you set restrictions in IE which will be inherited by Outlook. At least, that's how I'm protected from scripting in email. -- be - MOS Nothing can be done in one trip. --Snider -Original

RE: Internet Header Question

2003-08-14 Thread East, Bill
Who do you trust is the question. The first line shows that a machine calling itself 169.139.15.251 (Call it B) connected to your mailhost (A), but your mailhost saw its IP address was 210.91.16.8. If you own machine B, or if it's your trusted ISP, that's fine. Otherwise it was just a spammer at

RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000

2003-08-14 Thread East, Bill
But does it make a beeping noise when it backs up? OSHA regs, you know. -- be - MOS L: The average regulation has a life span one-fifth as long as a chimpanzee's and one-tenth as long as a human's -- but four times as long as the official's who created it.

RE: Blocking the Emails that come from yourself

2003-07-17 Thread East, Bill
Blackhole the sites at your router. It's a courtesy issue to notify the admins for the IP block. The images almost always link back to the sites and are not imbedded in the images themselves. -- be - MOS If God dropped acid, would he see people? -- Steven Wright -Original Message-

RE: Contacts issue

2003-07-16 Thread East, Bill
Profiles, John Parker. If you've modified a profile it sometimes will retain links back to the old mailbox's contacts folder. I'm trying to train our folks here to always add/delete profiles, never modify. Please be giving my regards to John Bigbootie. -- be - MOS I want to achieve

RE: exmerge

2003-07-15 Thread East, Bill
We outsourced our SSMs to leverage their synergy with our CRM business process. It boggles, all right. -- be - MOS -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: exmerge If you're

RE: S/MIME for public folders?

2003-07-11 Thread East, Bill
: East, Bill Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 4:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: S/MIME for public folders? I'm running Exchange 2000 and can issue S/MIME keys for individual users. However, I'd really like to issue one for a public folder. Is there a simple way to do this that I am

S/MIME for public folders?

2003-07-07 Thread East, Bill
I'm running Exchange 2000 and can issue S/MIME keys for individual users. However, I'd really like to issue one for a public folder. Is there a simple way to do this that I am missing, or is the feature not present? I've set up a test folder and unchecked the box Hide from Exchange address lists

RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails

2003-06-30 Thread East, Bill
Are you kidding? Then the admin can randomly change the referenced image to Yosemite Sam, a landshark, Milla Jovanovich or the animated GIF of the nitwit son of the CEO starring on COPS. C'mon Gary, it'll be fun! -- be - MOS Do not underestimate the power of the Force. -Original

RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-10 Thread East, Bill
It looks like you might have to lie to your Exchange server (through a hosts file, perhaps) to get the headers you want, or, for that matter, rewrite through a smarthost as sander suggested. But why worry about it? Let the headers read what they may. -- be - MOS Professor: Oh, dear. She's

RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.

2003-06-06 Thread East, Bill
Not me. I was press-ganged. Stupid frickin' British Navy. -- be - MOS Friends: People who borrow my books and set wet glasses on them. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Sending emails that can not be altered

2003-06-06 Thread East, Bill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 PGP and many other products will at least sign the email so that the content cannot be changed without invalidating the signature. But checking signatures requires a PGP client and is much too complicated for many users. - -- be - MOS On the

Public folders and the user who wouldn't

2003-04-04 Thread East, Bill
So we've gone through a 5.5 -- 2000 upgrade with some minor problems. But this one has me stumped. I have one particular user who cannot be given permissions to any of our public folders. There is no error message recorded and the symptoms are the same regardless of whether I use Outlook or ESM

RE: Public folders and the user who wouldn't

2003-04-04 Thread East, Bill
, she warn't never right. Active Director? I prefer Zubin Mehta Not ASDI -- be - MOS Die? I should say not, dear fellow. No Barrymore would allow such a conventional thing to happen to him. -- John Barrymore's dying words -Original Message- From: East, Bill Sent

RE: domain name

2003-03-27 Thread East, Bill
My sister once almost ran over Kevin Bacon, and my name is Bill, too. So there's your connection. -- be - MOS Imitation is the sincerest form of television. -- Fred Allen -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27,

RE: Strange 550 error

2003-02-12 Thread East, Bill
As best as I can guess, the remote server is complaining that the format of your message does not conform to the format it expects, which would be a user at a local host in the recipient's domain. The other half of the message is that it's not a gateway, so it will not pass on what appears to be a

RE: Strange 550 error

2003-02-12 Thread East, Bill
Actually the name optonline.net is misleading, the company I believe is Optimum Online or some such, n'est ce pas? But the name was a point of discussion, Jeffrey; it appears that the first thing that a spammer does after bringing the KFC and Schlitz into his trailer is to pick a domain name with

Haiku Friday (WAS: Shortcuts to Outlook objects)

2003-02-07 Thread East, Bill
Thread quickly lengthens The snow falls, deep on 9th Street BBQ time, Deaned. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:

RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects

2003-02-07 Thread East, Bill
-Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects You're missing the point Ed. Any form of compensation is a conflict of interest. Period. Nice absolute

RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects

2003-02-07 Thread East, Bill
-Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects I'm not sure how this refutes anything along these lines. Going to a trade show and picking up a freebie

RE: Virus activity

2003-01-15 Thread East, Bill
It's like there's a party in my Exchange server and everyone's invited. -- be - MOS To restore a sense of reality, I think Walt Disney should have a Hardluckland. -- Jack Paar -Original Message- From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January

RE: Your preference (given the capabilities of each w/cost not af act or)?

2003-01-13 Thread East, Bill
To do that voodoo you do so well. -- be - MOS Mater artium necessitas. [Necessity is the mother of invention]. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Your preference

RE: outlook OT

2003-01-13 Thread East, Bill
It's probably his POP3 client not recognizing the successful handoff to the Exchange server. Try having him use IMAP instead. There is no sane MUA that does POP3 that does not also do IMAP. -- be - MOS It'll be just like Beggars' Canyon back home. -- Luke Skywalker

RE: Opinions on the best message format.

2003-01-09 Thread East, Bill
In addition to the other objections raised, there are plenty of tricks that could be done with stylesheets, embedded content, c. that would substantially mask or change the content of a message after it had been received by your lawyers. Plain text makes it much harder to insert small print. --

RE: Happy Holiday!

2002-12-20 Thread East, Bill
And a hoopy Human Rights Day!!1!! (sorry, 10 days late on that one. I was undecorating my Human Rights Day boxwood.) -- be - MOS -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 7:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Happy

RE: FAST RESTORE?

2002-12-10 Thread East, Bill
I'm not sure I'd agree 100% with you there. I've seen Klez play havoc on an Exchange server that had some shares that the infected user could write to. Defense in depth suggests that you want to virus-protect the system and application files. -- be - MOS If I have to lay an egg for my

Haiku Friday

2002-11-15 Thread East, Bill
New PFY here As winter's winds gather strength Here's your cubicle. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:

RE: A question of NDR

2002-11-13 Thread East, Bill
I would miss your reply, Andy. You're like the little baby buffalo nibbling around the edges of the Exchange field. And I am the coyote who doesn't want to get sat on. -- be - MOS -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:18 AM

RE: Emails to clients that are restricted

2002-11-13 Thread East, Bill
Is somebody forging the headers? Trivially easy to do. Check to see if there are any SMTP headers in the messages, and if so, find the offender and put superglue on his or her keycaps. -- be - MOS You are confused; but this is your normal state. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez,

RE: Virus heads up

2002-11-08 Thread East, Bill
Funny, an AV rep just recently was quoted as saying We don't call everything a virus because when you go to the doctor you don't want him telling you that every illness you have is a broken leg. -- be - MOS It is better to give than to lend, and it costs about the same. -Original

RE: RBL's

2002-11-07 Thread East, Bill
-Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:rim;LutonSFC.ac.uk] Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 4:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's It's a great example, however, of people jumping all over something despite not understanding it much at all, which makes it a

RE: Postmaster reply address

2002-11-07 Thread East, Bill
RFC 2821 section 4.5.1: Any lowdown horny toad what doesn't have a postmaster address is gonna get his bottom whupped. There are exceptions, but they are rare. -- be - MOS Professor Farnsworth: Oh my, that steamed carrot was a bit spicy for me. -Original Message- From: Tom

RE: Mail Relaying Originator

2002-11-06 Thread East, Bill
There are tiny evil gremlins in your server that are sending these messages. But unlike in the movie Gremlins, (which was excellent if slightly technically flawed) these ones will shrivel into dust if they are put in water. Submerge your server in 24 degree (celcius) water for one full hour *while

RE: Mail blasts

2002-10-31 Thread East, Bill
There is not much you have to do. Let's look at a test message, sent by an Outlook 2000 client through a 5.5 IMS. I'll type the body of the message interspersed with my comments, marked by *** And anyone out there who has a better grasp on this than I can feel free to correct me. --- begin

RE: Brightmail

2002-10-02 Thread East, Bill
and comments on the web page are simply answered by other users saying Me Too Jim Helfer WTW Architects Pittsburgh PA Go Stillers ::-Original Message- ::From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ::Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:43 AM ::To: Exchange

RE: Brightmail

2002-10-01 Thread East, Bill
Actually I've just completed an installation of Razor, which is the open-source predecessor to Cloudmark's SpamNet. Like SpamNet, Razor uses consensus votes to determine what is and is not spam, and by using a simple procmail script I have the software marking spam as described by the original

RE: Undeliverable

2002-08-30 Thread East, Bill
-Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 5:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Undeliverable Do you really want to do that? I wouldn't bring it down to a few hours. As far as I know the accepted standard is 48

RE: IMAP and Relaying issues

2002-08-30 Thread East, Bill
Buy? Find a 486 or better, load your favorite Linux distro on it and you are set for the foreseeable future. And if you don't have any spare 486s, I'll send you a truckload. -- be - MOS All great discoveries are made by mistake. --Young -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex

RE: RE: Can't view HTML emails

2002-08-22 Thread East, Bill
To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RE: Can't view HTML emails And he's all over that like a donkey on a waffle. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: RE: Can't view HTML emails

OT: RE: Can't view HTML emails

2002-08-21 Thread East, Bill
Holy hairy frickin' jumping albino radioactive post-pliestocene catfish! CJ's back! -- be - MOS Grover Cleveland spanked me on two non-consecutive occasions! - Abe Simpson -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday,

RE: Determining Klez.H.Worm Origin

2002-07-19 Thread East, Bill
SMTP headers, ducks. At the very least they'll tell you where the originating system was. Then you can say to the recipient, hey, do you know anyone from WeSendVirses.com? and take it from there. The other option is to contact the postmaster at the sending domain. I've had mixed success with

RE: Titanium (aka: Exchange 2003)?

2002-07-19 Thread East, Bill
Upgrade or do not As the summer comes slowly Just buy Advantage -- be - MOS Now that I have my APPLE, I comprehend COST ACCOUNTING!! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

RE: Backup MX Record for Alternate Exchange 5.5 Server

2002-07-18 Thread East, Bill
Cost is not usually considered in relation to timing, if that is what you mean. You could have the second MX set to 10,000 and the individual MTA will still deal with it according to its preferences. Ideally if the MTA cannot reach the primary for whatever reason, it will immediately fall over

RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL

2002-07-17 Thread East, Bill
And yet, Baldric^WRobert, there are administrators out there who would not recognize a clever spam email if it danced up and down in front of them singing Clever Spam Emails are Here Again. Which is (partially) why SMTP has continued to work, since it was designed to run without too much

RE: Reverse DNS and Exchange

2002-07-12 Thread East, Bill
-Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Reverse DNS and Exchange Exchange 5.5 I'm a little confused on Reverse DNS. I kind of understand the concept that with

RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5

2002-07-11 Thread East, Bill
-Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5 1) Stop doing BLB. You know yourself that they don't work. Just use an Exchange aware

RE: While at Baja Fresh

2002-07-11 Thread East, Bill
Sophmoric humor In the summer heat falls flat Wait, it's Thursday, I don't have to use haiku to respond -- be - MOS I BET WHAT HAPPENED was they discovered fire and invented the wheel on the same day. Then that night, they burned the wheel. -- Jack Handley, The New Mexican,

RE: Message filtering

2002-07-10 Thread East, Bill
Yes you can, at least up to a limit. I usually go to http://www.arin.net/whois/ first, although you might skip this step since you already probably know they are in Asia. You could skip straight to http://www.apnic.net/ and go into their Whois feature to look up the owner of the IP address

RE: KLEZ or Sleaze

2002-07-08 Thread East, Bill
Probably a sleazy spammer (sorry, that's redundant). It's quite common to forge the from address. If your antivirus isn't going off you can know for sure. -- be - MOS You can't have everything. Where would you put it? -- Steven Wright -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst

RE: New Virus?

2002-07-08 Thread East, Bill
Nuke 'em from orbit. It's the only way to be sure. -- be - MOS If God didn't mean for us to juggle, tennis balls wouldn't come three to a can. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Exchange Security Logging

2002-07-05 Thread East, Bill
Check your Event Viewer, Application Log for Event 1016s. You will need to do some research to see which of these are false alarms, however. -- be - MOS If you ever fall off the Sears Tower, just go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will try to catch you because,

RE: Will this keep viruses from sending email through the address boo k ?

2002-07-02 Thread East, Bill
http://www.snopes.com/computer/virus/quickfix.htm However, it is true that if you look in the mirror and say Crowleyman three times all of your brick backups will be deleted. -- be - MOS If I lived back in the wild west days, instead of carrying a six-gun in my holster, I'd carry a

RE: Mailbox Privacy

2002-06-25 Thread East, Bill
We've seen this when people inherit old boxen and change (as opposed to deleting and creating a new one) the profile on the machine. Some hooks to the old mailbox remain and the event is generated when the user starts up Outlook. I agree with the rest of the crowd, though - turn off the

RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY

2002-06-21 Thread East, Bill
Listen to him, he's pre-med. -- be - MOS The decision doesn't have to be logical; it was unanimous. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY

RE: How to block UCE at MSX55-IMC level

2002-06-21 Thread East, Bill
To all - I've not researched this too carefully, but there was an announcement earlier this week about a product from cloudmark.com that will enable your end-users to better handle their own spam. I'm not associated with them and I really cannot say whether it will work as advertised, but from

RE: Monitoring application for Exchange

2002-06-18 Thread East, Bill
That was fun. You will need: The NT Resource Kit Scissors (ask your parents!) A cookie (optional) A command-line mailer (blat, wsendmail, what have you). Using the at facility, schedule a regular dump of the Event Log using the dumpel utility, then grep for the string you want. dumpel -f

FW: Monitoring application for Exchange

2002-06-18 Thread East, Bill
, but of course you could do a bunch of different tests with grep each time. -- be - MOS People in general do not willingly read if they have anything else to amuse them. -- S. Johnson -Original Message- From: East, Bill Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 8:38 AM

RE: What a lag . . .

2002-06-13 Thread East, Bill
That's nothing. I have library books that have been overdue for three weeks now. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What a lag . . . WOW . . . the posts about job hunting and Wal

RE: Outlook 97 Notification

2002-06-05 Thread East, Bill
You're new here, aren't you? Slipstick is a good answer. Aternatively, if you felt like it you could whip up a POP3 notifier, even something like xfaces to scan the second box. I thought I remembered a Java implementation: http://gate.cruzio.com/~jthomas/mailfaces/ -- be - MOS Competitive

RE: stupid disclaimers

2002-06-05 Thread East, Bill
I'm taking action on your message. I'm taking action on it right now. Nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah. Tell your lawyers to get their $49.95 back from J.D.'s 'R' Us. -- be - MOS Noone ever built a statue to a critic. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Cable Modems

2002-06-04 Thread East, Bill
How come on the hoagie-ordering systems there's no option for yuzu-fruit? -- be - MOS I like to go to art museums and name the untitled paintings... Boy With Pail...Kitten On Fire... -- Steven Wright -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday,

RE: Speed

2002-05-24 Thread East, Bill
Yo. If you back off a step, are there other options apart from consolidating the 9 Exchange servers into 1? Can you move the smaller offices onto the central server but leave servers at the bigger sites? Can you have several hub sites, where small local offices have dedicated lines into large

RE: Drive m:????

2002-05-22 Thread East, Bill
Plus, ever since I was partonized I've had to buy new shirts. -- be - MOS Support your local church or synagogue. Worship at Bank of America. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Bubbye

2002-04-30 Thread East, Bill
Anyone who hasn't spanked the intern yet, please put your name on the signup sheet. -- be - MOS -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bubbye Can you get me some coffee on

RE: Z

2002-04-26 Thread East, Bill
Mondo frickin' fins The gas cap is well hidden Springtime, chick magnet. -- be - MOS -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Z just got a `59 caddy =) -Original

RE: Database and Drives size

2002-04-11 Thread East, Bill
All I know is that if you can't measure a piece of string you can't manage a piece of string. -- be - MOS The sun never sets on those who ride into it. -- RKO -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:34 AM

RE: Comm Check

2002-03-29 Thread East, Bill
Mmmm defirbillated busts. -- be - MOS Troglodytism does not necessarily imply a low cultural level. -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comm Check I knew I'd get

RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST

2002-03-22 Thread East, Bill
7:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST As in aroused? Me too. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 6:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST

RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST

2002-03-21 Thread East, Bill
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST A little behind on your reading Bill? Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday

RE: Eseutil and isinteg

2002-03-21 Thread East, Bill
Possibility 1: There are other limiting factors, such as disk speed, that are keeping the utilities from using all of your CPU. Possibility 2: Your CPU is too busy sending triple copies of all of your email. -- be - MOS The trouble with opportunity is that it always comes disguised as hard

RE: Eseutil and isinteg

2002-03-21 Thread East, Bill
- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Eseutil and isinteg Possibility 1: There are other limiting factors, such as disk speed, that are keeping the utilities from using all of your CPU. Possibility 2: Your

RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST

2002-03-21 Thread East, Bill
of the C variants. Browsers are great for applets - I appreciate the capability to interface with a router through one - but in the end are a bit too Procrustean for my tastes. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 6:25 AM

RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST

2002-03-20 Thread East, Bill
-Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Yes, it works well. That was never the point. But, just like a MAPI session, you should be able

RE: exchange digest: March 06, 2002

2002-03-07 Thread East, Bill
Rosa Esquivel is no longer talking with Janelle Kessler. If you happen to speak with Janelle (you'll know her by the obvious hair extensions), please tell her that Rosa would like her Tupperware back. Janelle can drop it off at the front desk on her way home to her empty apartment for another

RE: OT outlook ops

2002-03-05 Thread East, Bill
This could be a fun project for someone with a little scripting skill. First, move all of the messages into an otherwise empty Inbox folder. Second, count the messages. Third, write a script that will do a POP3 connection with the server and RETR each message. Save the results to a text file.

RE: Blocking javascript email?

2002-03-01 Thread East, Bill
If you set IE to prompt you whether you want to run scripts, Outlook will prompt you for it as well. It also cuts down on the annoying jumping signatures, not to mention the popup disclaimers and other Stupid Outlook Tricks. The downside is that you will see a lot of prompts when browsing. --

RE: Alternative to UNIX procmail in Exchange

2002-02-22 Thread East, Bill
Hey Tom, you're going to feel kind of dumb high-centered on a log in that Ferrari. Sendmail is just as powerful and far more flexible than Exchange - in certain areas. Chaining a Sendmail server in front of an Exchange server is a valid solution, as is Ed's idea. To Samir, the original poster,

RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations

2002-01-25 Thread East, Bill
-Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations Maybe, but these are products which absolutely require maintenance. A month-old pattern file is

RE: Name Resolution problems

2002-01-24 Thread East, Bill
When you try to ping, are you using just the server name (foo) or the FQDN (foo.bar.baz)? Do you see different results with either one of those? Under ipconfig -all, what is the node type? -- be - MOS Logic doesn't apply to the real world. --Marvin Minsky -Original Message-

RE: Name Resolution problems

2002-01-24 Thread East, Bill
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 He who would learn to fly one day must first learn to stand and walk and run and climb and dance; One cannot fly into flying. -- Friedrich Nietzsche -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Off Topic - Encryption

2002-01-17 Thread East, Bill
Bill, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kmag01/ html/NT4_0Encryption.asp (link may wrap) makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with RPC. -- be - MOS I remember a bigger, older guy we called Dad. We'd eat some stuff, or

RE: Backup

2002-01-15 Thread East, Bill
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of East, Bill Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Don't worry Ed, you'll get your cut. I don't need another round of your thugs pouring lime Jello in my fishtank. -- be - MOS -Original Message- From: Ed

RE: Backup

2002-01-14 Thread East, Bill
Pretty cheap. That's what, about US$27.50? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of East, Bill Sent

RE: Backup

2002-01-11 Thread East, Bill
As others have pointed out, you don't need a server-class machine for a recovery server. For that matter, I have never needed to use a recovery server. Why? I use the Ed Crowley(tm) Never Restore(c) Method(sm)! For full details on this method, send 150 Euros and an unused thong to the address

RE: Containers

2002-01-04 Thread East, Bill
It's very difficult to move individuals between containers. Unless you have the power to keep people from changing jobs, use one contain for people, others for resources and whatnot. -- be - MOS Nothing will ever be attempted if all possible objections must be first overcome.

  1   2   >