I have 20K mailboxes that I've added a secondary smtp address to.
(obj-class, mode, alias, secondary-proxy-address)
What I'd like to do is flip flop all email address so that the secondary
smtp address becomes the primary.
I can't figure it out. Anyone have the magic?
thanks,
Paul
obj-class, mode, alias, email addresses
SMTP: - smtp:
smtp: - SMTP
On 1/16/03 12:04, Wehner, Paul (WEHNERPL) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have 20K mailboxes that I've added a secondary smtp address to.
(obj-class, mode, alias, secondary-proxy-address)
What I'd like to do is flip flop all email
I know I know I know, this questions has been asked a million times. My
question has a small but important twist.
We don't content filter our email here. Now they want to, even though we
are less then 6 months away from a Exchange 2000 and/or Exchange .Net
migration, but they want to do
-IT Network Support-
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 1:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: the spam product question
I know I know I know, this questions has been asked a million times. My
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Wehner, Paul (WEHNERPL) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Secondary smtp question
I have 20K mailboxes that I've added a secondary smtp
Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 1:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Secondary smtp question
obj-class, mode, alias, email addresses
SMTP: - smtp:
smtp: - SMTP
On 1/16/03 12:04, Wehner, Paul (WEHNERPL)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
And this works on both 5.5 and 2000?
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question
We bought IMSS from Trend a few months agoI am very happy
, 2003 10:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: the spam product question
I know I know I know, this questions has been asked a million times. My
question has a small but important twist.
We don't content filter our email here. Now they want to, even though we
are less then 6 months away
Got it. And actually I probably should have mentioned that. And I have
another question.
Our scenario is 1 5.5 mailbox server, 1 5.5 SMTP server, and a recently
aquired ANTISPAM server. This will be the gateway. So am I bound by
exchange 5.5 still since I'm not actually going to install
Because some people want that I guess...
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question
Our scenario is 1 5.5 mailbox server, 1 5.5 SMTP server, and a recently
, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question
Got it. And actually I probably should have mentioned that. And I have
another question.
Our scenario is 1 5.5 mailbox server, 1 5.5 SMTP server
Institute Of Technology
Beaumont, TX
Phone: 409-839-2040
Fax: 409-839-2931
http://www.lit.edu
-Original Message-
From: Weathersby, Bryce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question
Some low volume people
Mail Marshal?
-Original Message-
From: Weathersby, Bryce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question and Other stuff
Now as a side note... After I praise the GFI and start looking
?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question
Because some people want that I guess...
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Message-
From: Weathersby, Bryce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question and Other stuff
Now as a side note... After I praise the GFI and start looking into it for
deployment.. They have broken
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question
And that's bad, correct. My somewhat limited knowledge would think that's
bad.
So is it safe to assume that as I look at product, because it's a gateway
product, that it doesn't
Ok, super, I think I have been set straight on this subject. Thanks Martin.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question
Is it bad. No, I don't think so
]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question
Is it bad. No, I don't think so. More a matter of preference. I prefer to
get my mail and virus's cleaned up before it hits the server. I also like
the fact that the gateway will hold my
think it should be added soon.
On 1/16/03 12:11, Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know I know I know, this questions has been asked a million times. My
question has a small but important twist.
We don't content filter our email here. Now they want to, even though we
are less then 6
]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: the spam product question
The what anti-spam solution should I use FAQ answer I've submitted
weekly for the last 3 years is A1. The one Chris Scharff recommends for
you after a profitable (for him) consulting engagement
product question
Subject: RE: the spam product question
And that's bad, correct. My somewhat limited knowledge would think
that's bad.
So is it safe to assume that as I look at product, because it's a
gateway product, that it doesn't need to be software specific cause I'll
never be actually
Is it internal? Or did it originate externally? Also what version of
Exchange?
Thank you,
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January
In NT and Win2k, RPC is encrypted between machines. I'd call it fairly weak
encryption, but its encrypted.
-Original Message-
From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RPC Question
Sensitivity: Private
This might be somewhat of a vague question. We current have a
DellPowervault LTO 110T backup tape drive on our primary Exchange Server.
It will back up 100 Gig non-compressed or 200 Gig compressed. Does anyone
know the maximum size an Exchange DB can be if you use compression on the
tape? I'm
Does it matter?
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:41 PM
Subject: Backup onto LTO and compression question.
This might be somewhat of a vague question. We current have
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Backup onto LTO and compression question.
Does it matter?
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED
Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:41 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Backup onto LTO and compression question.
Subject: Backup onto
IMSS which is the next version of Trend Micro's Virus Wall provides the
ability to do reverse DNS lookups. It is my understanding that this will
help reduce SPAM from bogus addresses but will require more CPU resources to
accomplish.
My question is is anyone else using Reverse DNS Lookup's
Is RPC Encrypted? If so how? How strong is the Encryption? I can't find
whitepapers that talk about RPC.any help would be greatly appreciated.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
on it because it's not a user-accessible
feature; look in MSDN.
- Original Message -
From: Clemens, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 10:04 AM
Subject: RPC Question
Is RPC Encrypted? If so how? How strong is the Encryption? I can't
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98 and Exchange 5.5 NT4.
I have a user that writes the following:
Mike;
Is there a way that I can set up automatic indent on my messages? I
have found the indent increase and decrease tabs, but can I have it so my
messages automatically start with the
USE Stationary Picker in tools options then mail format
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A question or two from a user!!!
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98 and Exchange 5.5 NT4.
I have
On some mailboxes when using the Exchange Migration Wizard from Exchange 5.5
to Exchange 2000, in my test lab, it takes on an average 5 minutes and on
others it seems to go on for hours. In fact, one did take 6 hours.
One mailbox, which seemed to be relatively small in size - about 150 mgs,
took
Question
I don't think that the telephone analogy will explain multiple relay
hosts/delivery path options nor MX records.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Jordan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 3:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How do I explain NDRs
:donderdag 9 januari 2003 13:50
Aan: Exchange Discussions
Onderwerp:Exchange Migration Wizard Question
On some mailboxes when using the Exchange Migration Wizard from Exchange
5.5
to Exchange 2000, in my test lab, it takes on an average 5 minutes and on
others it seems to go on for hours
Subject: Exchange Migration Wizard Question
On some mailboxes when using the Exchange Migration Wizard from Exchange
5.5
to Exchange 2000, in my test lab, it takes on an average 5 minutes and
on
others it seems to go on for hours. In fact, one did take 6 hours.
One mailbox, which seemed
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Migration Wizard Question
It took approximately 20-30 minutes for a 100mb mailbox in our network
here. I did most of my mailbox moves
I've got some users that want to have moderators on certain PF
calendars... when a person posts to the calendar, the request is dumped
to the moderators for action before they show in the calendar. Here's
the problem: if a person is moderating multiple calendars, there
doesn't appear to be a way
Try www.slipstick.com
- Original Message -
From: Edgington, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:33 PM
Subject: PF moderator question
I've got some users that want to have moderators on certain PF
calendars... when
Message-
From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PF moderator question
I've got some users that want to have moderators on certain PF
calendars... when a person posts to the calendar, the request is dumped
Hey stop picking on Russians :)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Jordan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 6:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How do I explain NDRs Question
Telephone analogy again.
Once the phone connection is complete, then you
layers in the network model, or the
difference between SMTP and X.400 when sending e-mail.
Cheers, Chris
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 January 2003 04:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How do I explain NDRs Question
I've seen some that talk
I don't think that the telephone analogy will explain multiple relay
hosts/delivery path options nor MX records.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Jordan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 3:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How do I explain NDRs Question
explain NDRs Question
I don't think that the telephone analogy will explain multiple relay
hosts/delivery path options nor MX records.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Jordan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 3:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How do I
I don't think that the telephone analogy will explain
multiple relay hosts/delivery path options nor MX records.
Hmm... Phone book is DNS (where you look up the MX record.)
-Kevin
_
List posting FAQ:
: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 3:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How do I explain NDRs Question
Telephone analogy again.
Once the phone connection is complete, then you might still talk English at
one end, and try to talk to someone who only understands Russian at the
other end
Plenty of articles and how to's on MS site with regard from upgrading from
NT4.0/Exchange5.5 to Win2K/E2K
- Original Message -
From: Doug Kassay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 8:22 AM
Subject: Upgrade Question
We
-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 January 2003 17:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Upgrade Question
Plenty of articles and how to's on MS site with regard from upgrading from
NT4.0/Exchange5.5 to Win2K/E2K
- Original Message -
From: Doug Kassay [EMAIL
I did a delete of the thread and then thought that perhaps the data should
be expanded.
But, note that the comments including Daniel's were right on.
Explaining how mail delivery works to non-experts is not easy. It involves
explaining address resolution both within NT domains and in the DNS
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How do I explain NDRs Question
I did a delete of the thread and then thought that perhaps
the data should
be expanded.
But, note
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Upgrade Question
Plenty of articles and how to's on MS site with regard from upgrading from
NT4.0/Exchange5.5 to Win2K/E2K
- Original Message -
From: Doug Kassay [EMAIL PROTECTED
OK, we're actually in a similar (but not identical) situation to you, we're
5.5 on W2K in a pure W2K domain. It's nothing but sloth that has prevented
me from moving to Exchange2K.
I guess at this point the question should be Why stay on 5.5 not Why go
to 2K. IF you have a good reason to stay
Question
A nickels worth from the peanut gallery.
I have found that a phone number analogy works quite well with the
Non-Technical. They can associate with a wrong number, and number not in
service, and circuit overloads (all phones lines busy), it's a picture they
understand quite well. Plus
supported for several more years
I thought support for Exchange 5.5 ends this year.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade Question
OK, we're actually
I ask myself that question many times. Before I was in this position, (full
time construction management, part time network admin) the owner dealt with
only consultants, he would buy what they recommended. We now buy what I
recommend, but I am a little more grounded and do not use an elephant
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade Question
supported for several more years
I thought support for Exchange 5.5 ends this year.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
supported for several more years
I thought support for Exchange 5.5 ends this year.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade Question
OK, we're actually
Right - for a fee. No thanks.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade Question
'Extended' support is available through 2005.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx
We are currently running 5.5 enterprise and are in the process of getting a
new main server for an other business application. This is currently the
server that runs Exchange on NT 4 sp6. We will obviously be getting the new
server with 2000 server. The question has come up regarding upgrading
Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How do I explain NDRs Question
I have seen some non-technical types that like to send telephones flying
across the office and smashing into the wall.
-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto
: Upgrade Question
I ask myself that question many times. Before I was in this position,
(full time construction management, part time network admin) the owner
dealt with only consultants, he would buy what they recommended. We now
buy what I recommend, but I am a little more grounded and do not use
Discussions
Subject: How do I explain NDRs Question
I did a delete of the thread and then thought that perhaps the data should
be expanded.
But, note that the comments including Daniel's were right on.
Explaining how mail delivery works to non-experts is not easy. It involves
explaining address
situation. If your not sure bring in a Exchange consultant.
- Original Message -
From: Doug Kassay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 2:19 PM
Subject: RE: Upgrade Question
Yes, there is. And I have read quite a bit
Your question is itself inaccurate. You have two choices; you can:
- Join or upgrade an existing Exchange 5.5 organization, or
- Create a new Exchange 2000 organization.
Joining an existing Exchange 5.5 organization brings your new server up
into an existing Exchange 5.5 site. You specify
Hello,
I am running forestprep on a test domain and I am wondering when to use the
new site or join an existing site. I have an exchange 5.5 server in place
that I am doing an in place upgrade on to E2K so I already have an existing
site but this site is not in the Active Directory. I'm not sure
Create new. As you said this is a Test. By your question I would read and
understand all the pitfalls before under taking an in-place upgrade.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Newell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 6:48 PM
Do you have an ADC in place yet?
On 1/2/03 17:48, Mike Newell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am running forestprep on a test domain and I am wondering when to use the
new site or join an existing site. I have an exchange 5.5 server in place
that I am doing an in place upgrade on to E2K
Yes, a two way connection is setup and seems to be working.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Re: Forest prep question.
Do you have an ADC in place yet?
On 1/2
If I am backing up a file system with Veritas BE (incremental so it is
resetting the flags) and at the end of the backup something fails. Will the
file flags be changed back for the next attempt?
Johnny
_
List posting FAQ:
, December 11, 2002 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Veritas BE Question
If I am backing up a file system with Veritas BE (incremental so it is
resetting the flags) and at the end of the backup something fails. Will
the
file flags be changed back for the next attempt?
Johnny
Only stays in the Sent Mail folder of the sender
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 14:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DL Question
What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL
It is silently dropped.
- Original Message -
From: Morgan, Joshua [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:20 PM
Subject: DL Question
What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members?
TIA,
Joshua
Joshua
Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exmerge on Ex2K question/problem
Is it happening for ALL the mailboxes?
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312
What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members?
TIA,
Joshua
Joshua Morgan
Network Engineer
South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind
_
List posting FAQ:
*poof*
black hole.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no
members?
TIA,
Joshua
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DL Question
What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no
members?
TIA,
Joshua
Joshua Morgan
Network Engineer
South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind
It goes to email heaven Timmy.
- Original Message -
From: Morgan, Joshua [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:20 PM
Subject: DL Question
What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members?
TIA,
Joshua
It doesn't get delivered to anyone.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DL Question
What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members?
TIA,
Joshua
It is delivered to the members.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has
no members?
Well, in my test, it looks like its somewhere up where the space station is!
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DL Question
What happens to an E-mail
It goes to /dev/null, the bit bucket, a blackhole, call it what you like.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DL Question
What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL
ROTFL!!
Thanks
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: DL Question
It goes to email heaven Timmy.
- Original Message -
From: Morgan, Joshua [EMAIL PROTECTED
Perhaps this is a more interesting question than implied.
There are two or maybe three (or maybe four) possibilities depending on
where the DL is located, how many servers are involved and how many
instances of single instance storage are involved.
If it is a client DL, then I think
In Ex5.5, DL's DO have SMTP addys.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Question
Perhaps this is a more interesting question than implied.
There are two or maybe three
Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Question
In Ex5.5, DL's DO have SMTP addys.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Question
Perhaps this is a more interesting question than implied
Question
Ok, that's neat. How do you discern the ascii string to the left of the @?
MSX DL display names support spaces and special characters, which SMTP does
not.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:16 PM
To: Exchange
to a memberless DL,
no matter where it comes from.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 14:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Question
Ok, that's neat. How do you discern the ascii string to the left of the @?
MSX
Running into a very odd issue..
- Running Ex2000, SP2 on all servers w/Symantec AVFiltering build 95
- Running Exmerge version 6.0 (6.0.6249.0 from Ex2K SP3 to be exact)
On one server we have with a single storage group and 3 mailbox stores
in that SG, we get the following error when trying to
Google no help?
http://www.experts-exchange.com/Networking/Email_Groupware/Exchange_Server/Q
_20138049.html
-Original Message-
From: Scott Pease [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Running into a very odd issue..
- Running
Discussions
Subject: Exmerge on Ex2K question/problem
Running into a very odd issue..
- Running Ex2000, SP2 on all servers w/Symantec AVFiltering build 95
- Running Exmerge version 6.0 (6.0.6249.0 from Ex2K SP3 to be exact)
On one server we have with a single storage group and 3 mailbox stores
GAL = Nothing
Set MAPI = Nothing
set fso = nothing
set Folder = nothing
set oStream = Nothing
set Out=nothing
[END CODE]
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 November 2002 21:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Export question
Thanks, yeah I
I am trying to export using a csv file to gather DL information...it works
fine until I add the SMTP field, it actually works until it goes through
about 100 DLs but always stops on one particular DL. Any idea of what can
make it stop, or how to identify what the problem is?
Have you checked the log file?
-Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 8:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DL Export question
I am trying to export using a csv file to gather DL information...it works
fine until I
What is about this one DL that is different from the others?
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DL Export question
I am trying to export using a csv file to gather DL information
at the eventvwr on the server but there was
nothing there.
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DL Export question
I am trying to export using a csv file to gather DL information...it works
fine until I add the SMTP field
Subject: DL Export question
I am trying to export using a csv file to gather DL information...it
works fine until I add the SMTP field, it actually works until it goes
through about 100 DLs but always stops on one particular DL. Any idea
of what can make it stop, or how to identify what
How are you adding the SMTP field? What, exactly, are you typing the CSV
header file?
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Export question
Actually its not just the SMTP field
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Export question
How are you adding the SMTP field? What, exactly, are you typing the CSV
header file?
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday
administrator
on. Hopefully this helps a little.
-Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Export question
Actually its not just the SMTP field that makes it stop on that DL, it
worked
to better
format the DNs for members of a DL export? Excel's 65000 limitation is
going to hinder the results.
-Original Message-
From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Export question
First of all when
501 - 600 of 1901 matches
Mail list logo
