You can't have 2 Notes Connectors connecting the same EXCHANGE.BOX either as
it is liable to cause contention issuers which can result in a corrupt file.
(Ie both connectors try and grab the same message at the same time)
HTH
- Original Message -
From: Neil Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
It's fairly poor use of overtime, as I see it, watching mailboxes slowly
move between servers. So rather than doing a lot of overtime, over several
days, I prefer to do the whole job in one day. And if I'm going to do the
job in one day, I prefer the backup restore method which is quicker, and
Maybe different outlook on things - in my site while the workers are here
9-5, access to mail is from off site as well and the thought of
disconnecting them for a day, even at weekends, would be unacceptable. In
your situation, it obviously is acceptable.
Hi All
Got a small issue. Exch 5.5 SP4, Win2K Sp2.
I am trying to set up a second email domain for a company we have just
bought out on to our existing Exchange server. For ease of viewing I created
a second recipients container named as per the company. Users were then
created in this container
Correct! We don't have any problems scheduling downtime for week-ends on an
occasional basis, especially if the outcome for the users concerned is a
faster server afterwards!
-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 10:31
To: Exchange
Overtime?
You lean over to your laptop on the coffee table at home connected over the
VPN or TS session and select a block of mailboxes and select move mailbox
and return to the NCAA basketball game or whatever. An hour later, you
select the next block, then take the dog for a walk. Return
And get paid for it. Result!
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 10:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
Overtime?
You lean over to your laptop on the coffee table at home
Particularly during the play-wrestle with the wife
-
Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 10:40
To: Exchange
Who wins, you or Claire?
-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 10:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
Particularly during the play-wrestle with the wife
Cool. Thanks John. Never tried it, so one to avoid then!
Neil
-Original Message-
From: John Westworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 03 April 2002 09:21
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: Connector for Lotus Notes
Subject: Re: Connector for Lotus Notes
You can't
manly voice
Me, of course
/manly voice
-
Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 11:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Of Course!
-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 11:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
manly voice
Me, of course
/manly voice
-
-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 April 2002 16:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Trend Micro ScanMail for Exch 2000
Hello all,
We are considering ScanMail for spam management.
We currently own GroupShield for AV and attachment
As regards the top level folders, have you checked your site's Config
settings? Under Information Store Site Configuration, then Top Level Folder
Configuration, your account should be listed among those able to create top
level folders.
As regards the user ndr's, it sounds like the wrong
Hi,
I can able to view the contents of Administrator mailbox using Widows
Explorer
but for other user its telling Access is denied.
Where to set the permission for that.
Thanx in Advance
Vijay
_
List posting FAQ:
I, for one, am deeply disappointed that this thread is not about beer. I was
about to jump on this like a donkey on a waffle(1)
(1) Hi, CJ!
Dale L. Orr
Network Administrator
DoD Polygraph Institute
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April
8 to 5 in IT? What's wrong with 5pm to 8am to accomplish this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rowell, John
(AFIT)
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
No, I
Oh. Then carry on then. Anyone who uses WordMail deserves what they get! ;)
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 8:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: News flash: Outlook still sucks
The good news is that it appears as
Or you could do the Ed' method which work most excellent for me...Thx Ed
others...
You could say move a few in the early morning..some late afternoon.
Maybe even..hold your breath...remote connect Late evening/early morning and
tell it to
move a whole lot...
Like I could Citrix in to my
Exactly. VPN in, start the mailbox move, go to bed.
Wake up, coffee, crap, check mailbox move, party all day.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 5:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new
:( sorry buddy, I don't drink beer, and its not that I'm from Utah. Its
just cause I don't like the taste. Now if we were to start a thread about
rum and coke. I'd be all over that.
-Original Message-
From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002
I ran forest prep and domain prep. They both said they worked fine. I
checked and everything was updated except for the Exchange OU folder had a
different icon on it other than the folder icon. This morning I went to set
up a PF CA. I don't get the option to create one? I guess the Domain
Got to love that osi thingamajigy.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 5:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Re: hops?
I do believe that's TCP returning the error; Exchange is only reporting it.
In proper
Exchange version? If you can see the contents of the administrators mailbox
using windows explorer I think you have more important issues to resolve
before this one.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Vijayakumar, T [mailto:[EMAIL
::spudder::
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 6:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hops?
:( sorry buddy, I don't drink beer, and its not that I'm from Utah. Its
just cause I don't like the taste. Now if we were
I thought this thread was about dancing bears.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 5:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: hops?
I, for
Thank you to all that replied to my request. The responses were very
helpful...
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 4:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 question
I haven't tried it, but I know that
RAAAHH!
Does anybody know why I can't create a public folder connection
agreement? I have ran domain and forestprep successfully. It doesn't even
give me th option to create one. Just a plain connection agreement. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael
Have you set up a recipient connection agreement yet?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade problems
RAAAHH!
Does anybody know why I can't create a
Reminds me of what I used to say about MSMail: What's amazing is not how
well the bear dances, but that the bear dances at all.
- Original Message -
From: Louis Joyce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:23 AM
Subject: RE: hops?
Yes sir, I have a one way from our 5.5 server to AD.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade problems
Have you set up a recipient connection agreement yet?
-Original
When I click new it only gives me Connection Agreement
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade problems
Have you set up a recipient connection agreement yet?
Since it's likely that your Exchange servers are not members of the same
site and possible that they might not even be members of the same Exchange
organization and because it would be interesting to set up an ADC over the
internet, you might look at exmerge as a way to move users and the
What's the design goal? You could create a distribution List which contained
everyone in the company and invite that address to the meeting.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 8:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I've moved 1800 users from one server to another before using the ECMSM and
when measuring the amount of my time that it took to complete the move vs.
doing a backup and restore there is no comparison.. The ECMSM wins hands
down.
5:00 PM: Fire up the Exchange Admin on the destination server
5:01
Do users get an error message when they sent to that domain?
-Original Message-
From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 2:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Second email domain on Exchange server
Hi All
Got a small issue. Exch 5.5
5:04 PM: Remember you left server room door key inside server room.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
I've moved 1800 users from one
5:15pm: Break in because problem account crashed IS when it tried to move it.
5:04pm: You do the above because you remember the key is locked inside. hehe
Don't get me wrong I love the ECMSM works great, and is less filling. However;
I did have several accounts that did the above last time I
5:10PM: Get beaten up by other admins on team for buying Coors Light.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
I've moved 1800 users from one
All together: JUST SET IT.AND FORGET IT!!
-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
5:15pm: Break in because problem account crashed IS when
The ECMSM worked great for me, luckily I have a lone Win2k VPN server set up
for me and some Directors to connect up with our home ADSL accounts, and I
can Dameware into the NT4 Exchange server to do some 'babysitting' although
nothing was required. Set it and forget it indeed. I can have a lager
I do the same thing. However it isn't will the box come back up that gets
me. Its will the box cleanly shut down, since that is whrer I have always
had my issues.
Now days I always manually kill services before shutting down. IIS, SQL,
Exch, etc.
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield
I think we originally installed the ADC using Windows 2k CD. Should I
renstall with ADC from Exch2k CD?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade problems
When I click
Which is easy since they are all on one box.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
I do the same thing. However it isn't will the box come
One PC...
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
Which is easy since they are all on one box.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
Use the one from the E2K SP2 CD.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade problems
I think we originally installed the ADC using Windows 2k CD.
Should I
True, that's advice I will definitely take on board. I have had situations
whereby a server 'hangs' on shutdown and continues to respond to a ping
indefinately, but refuses to allow me to connect in any other way
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
If it's a WAN/LAN connection and you do indeed still receive a ping
response, I have found that the BORK tool, shutdown.exe will sometimes
recover from this situation.
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:38 AM
To: Exchange
Yes. Absolutely. Required AAMOF.
- Original Message -
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:27 AM
Subject: RE: Upgrade problems
I think we originally installed the ADC using Windows 2k CD. Should I
I am trying to install Exchange Administrator (5.5) on a .net standard
server (Latest post Beta 3 build from MSDN). Anyone tried this? You get the
below message. I KNOW this is beta and I am not looking for anyone to bust a
nut. Just curious if anyone else has encountered or worked around . . .
It's not supported. Ex2K might install on it, but not 5.5
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:04 AM
Subject: Exchange not supported by this version of Windows
I am trying to install Exchange
Exchange 2000 isn't supported yet either. They've been telling us that
it won't be till RC1
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel
Chenault
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange not
EXACTLY
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
True, that's advice I will definitely take on board. I have had situations
whereby a server
I am trying to change the LDAP port from 389 to 390. However I get a message
which says:
The directory is busy, wait a few minutes and try again.
Microsoft Exchange Directory
ID no: DS_ E_ BUSY
I have stopped and started services but I still get the above
Try renaming the srvmax.exe to setup.exe and running it that way. That was
something you have to do when installing OWA 5.5 on Win2K. It might work.
Then again, probably it won't.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03,
I'm running W2K server with AD and ADC for my ex.5.5 site. Trying to make
sure that I can replicate
all my ex. data over to the AD.. So far only a few mailbox's have been
replicated... But I keep geting this messages
in the event logs for frs.
FRS has detected that the replica root path has
Hi
in the past my customers often decided to use VPN instead of OWA for
security reason.
Now with eEye Secure IIS product, do some of you think like me, the security
issues of IIS are less frightning ?
Do you still tell your customer to go VPN (OL 2000 or xP ) or you are now
using Secure IIS
Can anybody give me some hints/guides/recommendations as to
increasing the ability of OL/Exchange to be more of a CRM software
say like a ACT or Goldmine..etc..
thx
bill
_
List posting FAQ:
Myself, I take the cleaver away from the dog. Never know when the little
mutt is going to sneak up on you in the middle of the night and have a whack
at your neck, for forgetting to fill his dish before you went to bed!
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL
Last Friday, one of our Exchange 2000 servers had a meltdown. Apparently
there was some corruption brewing in the storage group but it never
triggered any warnings or errors in the event log. Finally on Friday, the
server started acting up, refusing connections. Thenit only got worse.
Information
If yours is a small organization - you can use Outlook forms/folder
rules/etc to achieve something like what you are requesting. The Ms Press
book Building Applications with Outlook explains how and gives examples,
but - you will wind up constantly troubleshooting user errors. Get the
real CRM
Outlook 2000 SR-1 on Win 2000, Exchange 2000 SP2 on Win 2000 SP2
Not just one client machine but every one I try in our organisation, any
ideas?
Thanks
Mike
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
I thought I'd seen this problem addressed but can't find it in the archives, nor
Technet, nor slipstick.com:
Exch2K, SP2 in AD network -- accesing OWA using IE, various flavors but mostly
IE5.5SP2.
Attachments get to/from their destinations fine. However, the process of opening
attachments
Yeah, but it gets very grey when the application is leveraging QoS or is an
LDAP query about the last MAC address where a specific user was running an
authenticated session (DEN/CIM capability).
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02,
Any ideas folks?
RB
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:
You live in the USA, I live in Italy. You have a fast connection from home,
I do not.
You watch basketball, I watch soccer. :-)
You do it your way, I do it mine!
Your mailboxes take little time to move (it seems), mine would take in
excess of 1 day.
-Original Message-
From:
I'm connected from home at a 21,600KBps dial up right now, connected to an
exchange server 3800km away.
The mailboxes are not moving through your connection at home. I would
assume the exchange servers that you move the mailboxes between are on the
LAN together.
William
I also don't watch
The lies we told about how secure it was . . .
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: hops?
Reminds me of what I used to say about MSMail: What's amazing is not how
well the bear
I have found that a 56k connection is ample for terminal services (pc
anywhere/dameware/win2k)
The frustration of watching the screen refresh is far outweighed by the
benefits or being able to carry out these tasks remotely
-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL
Not if you have invested in Remote Management cards. For Compaq servers
this would be the following
:-http://www.compaq.com/manage/remote-lightsout.html.
It does bump the cost per server up a little, but compare this to the
over-time costs of having to pay someone else to baby-sit your servers
Gentel people,
is that goed idea, and/or possible (i am testing at home and it doesnt work)) to
replicate 3 different smtp recipients (domain level)to an E2K server through one way
connection agreement.
I mean from 5.5 org's to e2K org.
What I want to see is next:
- Configure e2k server as
71 matches
Mail list logo
