But then they talk about how the IT guy is a dick etc. Already had that
happen.
-Original Message-
From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
And then when the users come yelling,
And then I can call you and pay you to fix the mess. :-)
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 3:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
It is possible that your best option is to do as I suggest
OK now that that has been beaten to death, I now want to try and understand
the aspects that effect performance (or perceived performance) for users. So
the policy will be set at a certain large number for storage. Now will
exchange run better if users use folders or does it not matter and I
James writes;
But then they talk about how the IT guy is a dick etc.
Already had that happen.
If anyone finds a surefire way to avoid this happening, then they could be Very Rich
Very Quick (put me on the DL)...
All the best,
Andéjà vudy
-Original Message-
From: Woodrick,
James I guess it depends on your situation as well as best practices.
I've noticed no particular performance degredation with people having 1+ messages
in their inbox, or another folder [a là my Exchange List Archive folder...] when they
are running on a fast (LAN/10Mbit+) link.
Users
I mentioned this before, but I am pretty sure there is a limit on the each
folder of around 16k messages and 2gb (or 1.8)? Pretty sure about the
messages, and fairly sure about the folder size.
Cheers
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 July
On your comment about
Oh, and by the way, how much is that actually taking up on your server? 1GB?
Not with single instance storage!
---
I think you might not quite understand the problem with SIS, it is only good
for when the email is being sent in
Don't question the Ed.
The original message is still stored using SIS. Each reply is also stored
using SIS.
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
On your
Hi,
I would like to add some questions or thoughts here.
As an IT professional, business managers have to be educated and 'yes' they
must be tuned into ramifications, etc but most of the time business decision
makers don't give time to IT until something is broken. Seen strictly as a
service
My Windows NT4 sp6a server running Exchange 5.5 SP4 box is finally going
to be upgraded to Windows 2000. Shortly after I'll be upgrading to
Exchange 2000.
Are there any gotchas I need to worry about wiht the OS upgrade? Should
I set all Exchange services to manual before the upgrade process? I
I have Exchange 2000 Server with SP2.
In Outlook my Global Address List is empty. All client have the same
problem. The client can send and recive e-mail but can not see the GAL.
If I try to create another Outlook profile I recive the following message:
The name could not be resolved. The name
In my exchange 5.5 / ex2000 site, I have a site connector to a sister server
that is no longer in-use.
What is the best way to remove the connector?Is there more to it than
just hitting delete on the
edit menu?
Ron
_
List
Are you sure the attachment enters the Exchange system?
-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 July 2002 02:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can't open attachments
Hi Everyone,
I have a problem with a user (using Outlook 2000) who can't open
exchange 5.5, sp4, nt4, sp6a
I am seeing a rash of e-mails being delivered to users where the FROM and
TO addresses are ex-employees of the company. The users who are getting
the e-mails are not on the FROM, TO, or BCC lines.
if I send an e-mail to any of the addresses in the e-mail, I will
Could be Klez...
-Original Message-
From: Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: unknown users e-mails entering environment
exchange 5.5, sp4, nt4, sp6a
I am seeing a rash of e-mails being delivered to users where the FROM
You are trolling, right?
Read this
http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_sec5.htm
..any other questions, see the archives...
Leave it there, guys? Please?
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Jeffery Caudill
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 8. juli 2002 23:05
To: Exchange
Blow away profile and recreate (I know you probably did it, but try it
again). If no luck, I would still uninstall Outlook and reinstall Outlook
(don't just install Outlook over the version on the machine). If that
doesn't work, try ExMerging her mailbox and recreating it. It sounds like
there
What do the emails look like (subject, body) - are they similar?
John J. Steniger
-Original Message-
From: Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: unknown users e-mails entering environment
exchange 5.5, sp4,
Jeffrey,
You can you any backup software you like to backup your M: drive, but it
is highly un-recommended. The M: drive is a virtual drive looking at the
Exchange IS. For any other purpose it is best to leave alone, at the
risk of causing database corruption or at least confusion. To backup the
Shouldn't have any problems with the upgrade. Is it a domain controller?
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Upgrading my NT4 exchange 5.5 box to Win2000
My Windows NT4 sp6a server
No. It's just a member server.
Shouldn't have any problems with the upgrade. Is it a domain controller?
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Upgrading my NT4 exchange 5.5 box to
This seems to be a new practice for spammers, we just spoke about it yesterday. They
fake their headers just like the klez, but the only payload is the annoying email.
Figure out the sending server from the header and see if it is a domain that you can
block.
-Original Message-
Let's be a bit more clear on this subject. IF you mess around with your
M drive, anti-virus, backing up, etc., expect to be doing some fixing.
M drive is a virtual drive and NOT to be touched by anything. If you
do, you take a great chance of corrupting your M Drive and then the next
question
Fix the RUS
-Original Message-
From: Laurentiu Bogdan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:59 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: GAL empty
Subject: GAL empty
I have Exchange 2000 Server with SP2.
In Outlook my Global Address List is empty.
Ignore the M: Drive. Do not back up the M: Drive. There is no M: Drive.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffery Caudill
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 5:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: M Drive
What program can I use to Back-up the M drive and,
My intent is to find out how to backup my public folders, I can only find them on the
m drive, is there a way to backup this information, or is it also in the information
store.
thanks,
Jeffery Caudill
-Original Message-
From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July
try creating another outlook profileBUT use a different name than
before..we have done this in the past and it fixed it..
dave
-Original Message-
From: Laurentiu Bogdan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: GAL empty
I
www.mail-resources.com lists several archival products in the web links
section.
-Original Message-
From: malcolm taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Archiving old email to tape silos
I have been asked by
Sounds like the search permissions have been restricted inappropriately.
What changes were made prior to this?
-Original Message-
From: Laurentiu Bogdan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: GAL empty
I have Exchange
I think Ed understands SIS quite well.
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
On your comment about
Oh, and by the way, how much is that actually taking up on
There's an E2K developer edition?
-Original Message-
From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K Developer Edition
Can anyone tell me or provide a ref to the differences between Exchange
2000
Shouldn't have a problem..
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrading my NT4 exchange 5.5 box to Win2000
No. It's just a member server.
Shouldn't have any problems with the
Sounds like it might be an AV issue...
-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can't open attachments
Hi Everyone,
I have a problem with a user (using Outlook 2000) who can't
It's in the Information Store. Chant with us allThere is no M
drive...There is no M driveThere is no M Drive
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jeffery Caudill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Jeffrey,
Find the server that the public folders are homed on and backup the
Public Folder store there, using an Exchange aware product.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Jeffery Caudill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 July 2002 15:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: M Drive
My
Since OWA is running by default on all E2K servers... what are you hoping to
test on the FE server that can't be tested on the E2K server directly?
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Yes there is, it is for developing software for exchange. My guess would
be he means this SDK
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/default.asp?url=/downloads/sample.as
p?url=/MSDN-FILES/027/001/833/msdncompositedoc.xml or the 5.5 dev thing
you could buy It has some neat little bits and bobs in it.
All users? Some users?
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Calendar issue
Good day All,
Exchange 2000 SP2/OLXP;
Cannot see another user's calendar(no information/no free/busy
It's in the public information store. Check the swinc.com Exchange FAQ for a
link to the disaster recovery whitepapers. I was just rereading them last
week... quite helpful.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffery Caudill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:30 AM
To:
thank you for the information,
jeff
-Original Message-
From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: M Drive
Jeffrey,
Find the server that the public folders are homed on and backup the
Public Folder store
Only applies to PST files.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: One Folder (was Unlimited Quotas)
I mentioned this before, but I am pretty sure there is a limit on the each
Set quotas and allow users to manage their mailboxes however they'd like
within those quotas. For the most part you're over thinking the rest. It
would be nice if users sent shortcuts to files located on network drives,
but since I haven't had occasion to do that in 2+ years, I tend not to harp
Just the functionality of front-end/back-end servers!! Organization
management want the
functions seperated - so I seperate them
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange
Ronald,
Check out Q article Q184535 That should be what you are looking for.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
You NEED to read this strait away before you touch anything on this
server. They use an exchange aware back like NTbackup on the server
itself. Then you need to forget you EVERY saw that M drive until you
read up on it, and TEST USING your Test lab MANY Times before you put
it in production.
I know there's an SDK for Exchange, but I've never heard of a developer
edition of Exchange the MSDN version (for example) is the enterprise
version of Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:46 AM
To: Exchange
File sizes as shown in the directory do not change until the file is
closed, so what you're observing is hardly unusual. Look at free space
on the drive as an indicator instead.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
Having lots of messages in one folder will cause noticeably sluggish
response when users do things like search, change views or click on
column headings to change sort orders.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
That is not entirely accurate. While it is true that the reply is a
different message, the reply also uses SIS in that one copy of the reply
is maintained for the sender and all recipients in the same information
store database.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
We've just moved our Exchange 5.5 Cluster on Windows NT 4.0, SP6a from
fiber based storage to scsi based storage. I evicted a node and rebuilt it
and restored from Backup. This allowed us to keep Exchange running up till
the point we werer ready to restore on the new storage.
We're ready to add
Is there a utility that will document the hierarchical structure of Public
Folders? Such as a Visio document or word document?
TIA!
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
try Ecora
-Original Message-
From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folders
Is there a utility that will document the hierarchical structure of Public
Folders? Such as a Visio document or
I've got Exchange 5.5, SP4 on a decent sized server with 1GB of RAM but
the STORE.EXE is taking up so much of the physial memory that we are
unable now to restore a mailbox using Backup Exec. We backup all
mailboxes nightly.
Total memory 1047968
The store.exe is using 915,420
What can be done
We're being hit big time by the KLEZ virus. Here is one of the messages that
was sent. I've checked everyone's machines and everyone seems clear. So I'm
guessing it's someone who works closely with our company as we have emails
floating back and forth between staff who claim they never sent each
www.groupstudy.com
Several lists there, and few questions are about certification.
(It's also the 5th entry listed on Google when you search on Cisco discussion
lists)
-Original Message-
From: A. Al [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 7:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Put it in as
@vsnl.net
That will chop everything from vsnl.net and any subdomains it might have.
Note: One thing I have found that appears to work like a champ is if you
want to kill all email from a country you can enter @ru and kill all email
from Russia. Make sure that you don't
I don't reboot my Exchange servers ever... nor do I restore individual
mailboxes. I'd contact your backup vendor to ask them why their product is
failing to work as you believe it should and check out 'never restore'
portion of the Exchange FAQ.
-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller
First I'd change my DL SMTP addresses to something non-obvious. Then I'd
implement an antivirus solution which could be configured to drop worms.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I do have anti-virus software and it is trapping and quarantining the
messages. But that doesn't stop the spoofed email from coming in.
I would like to find out the source of the infection - who is the user who
has been infected. Can I tell from the message header attached below ?
Maybe I'm missing something here, but if there are people in that domain who work
closely with your company, how can you possibly get away with blocking the entire
domain?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:28
To:
Which AV package are you using? Perhaps it can be persuaded to stop the entire
message, rather than just the attachment.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filtering
I
Developer Edition is the version that comes with Office 2000/XP Developer
Version. It also includes SQL Server 2000 Developer Edition.
Best Regards,
JMU
Jim Underwood
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:00
To: Exchange
203.199.81.81
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filtering
I do have anti-virus software and it is trapping and quarantining the
messages. But that doesn't stop the
42
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filtering
203.199.81.81
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:28
That might be the answer, but what is the question
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 July 2002 19:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filtering
42
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
All,
I have a question concerning rehoming public folders from Exchange 5.5
to Exchange 2000. I can rehome the folders just fine. The one thing
that we have a problem with is that we have distribution lists that were
given permissions to certain public folders. Now I'm trying to figure
out
Are you running Native Mode in Active Directory?
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folders
All,
I have a question concerning rehoming public folders from Exchange 5.5 to
No, we are still in Mixed mode.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange
Very Good! Martini's @ Milliways after work?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filtering
42
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL
Bombay sapphire anyone?
-Original Message-
From: Tim Tullis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filtering
Very Good! Martini's @ Milliways after work?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
Maybe this is along the line of the M drive. Can someone point me to source
that describes the functions and management (if any) of the System Mailbox.
I guess it must be a do not touch thing based what it says in Q253784.
Jim Liddil
MX records.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Simple question
I have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server running as a BDC that I would like to
change the IP address on. I
There is no IMS involved here. It connects to a hub server that has the IMS
on it. There are no internal MX records, either. I should have clarified
that in my original post. Thanks anyway.
Any other thoughts
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
If your WINS is working properly, all you should have to change is the
DNS entry if you don't have dynamic update.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sweet, that is exactly what I was hoping to hear.
Thanks much.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Simple question
If your WINS is working properly, all you should have to change is
The attachment does enter the Exchange system but the problem turned out to
be Groupshield. Groupshield had gone belly up and seemed to be regarding
every attachment as a potential virus so wouldn't open them. The confusing
part was that there was no useful error message other than something
Groupshield is generally reasonably reliable? Have they threatened you? If
you testify against them we can provide you with generally reasonably
reliable protection.
-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:51 PM
To: Exchange
Prolonged exposure to Groupshield alters one's perception of reliability.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 15:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can't open attachments
Groupshield is generally reasonably
There's a limit?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Smith
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Size of mail being transferred across the internet
Hi All
This will seem a silly question but what is
There is no set limit.
Exchange by default has none. I once had a guy try to email a 500MB SQL
dump.
Most ISP's have approx a 3-5 MB limit. I think Hotmail has 1 MB.
I have my IMS set at 15MB
-Original Message-
From: Roger Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002
I've mine set at 10mb
john
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Size of mail being transferred across the internet
There is no set limit.
Exchange by default has none. I
That's nothing, I've seen users zip up their HDD and try to email that home
for a backup!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 7:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Size of mail being transferred across the internet
The sad thing was that after @Home rejected it, it sent the whole thing back
in the NDR.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 6:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Size of mail being transferred across the internet
That's
I just downloaded a 4 gig ISO image this morning? There is no limit.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Smith
Sent:
Hahahahaha..!!
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 6:32 PM
To: Exchange
The guy came so close to getting canned I cant even measure it.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 7:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Size of mail being transferred across the internet
Hahahahaha..!!
--Kevinm
Could you email that to my hotmail account?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Miller
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 7:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Size of mail being transferred across the internet
I just downloaded a
And the NDR is even bigger :P
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Had a lot of problems getting AutoAccept from ExchangeCode.com to work with
E2K and found the problem (with some help from this list) was with
permissions. Had to give the eventconfig send as and receive as permissions
on the resource mailboxes to make it work.
-Original Message-
From:
That's nice if I tried that 4 Gig x 56K = long time (coupla months)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 10 July 2002 2:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Size of mail being transferred across the internet
Could you email that
1.The lockdown tool can't lock down the *.htr files that keeps the most
important thing (username password). Lockdown tool can lock down the whole
IIS lope holes.(If I do this, user cant log in)
If I use lockdown tool to unblocked the *.htr files, I've tried the url
scan, there are lope holes
91 matches
Mail list logo
