RE: Brightmail
NEMX seems to have good tools for spam filtering (and more). Server based (with user-specific rules), use RBL, and run on MSX 2K/5.5 and SBS4.5/2K. http://www.nemx.com/products/index.asp But I never heard of NEMX on this list other than one satisfied comment in early September: I'm using it succesfuly. It quarantines about 2000 messages a day of wich 20 are legit messages. Anybody else out there has any other experience to share? Alberto -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brightmail CloudMark is also a client app. Runs ok most of them. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 18:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brightmail I'm running a copy of IHateSpam from Sunbelt (www.sunbelt-software.com). Seems to work well. This is not a server-based solution, but does most of the other things you want. You could add it to a standard image. David -Original Message- From: ITS.Teams.TNT.Mailing-Lists.MailingList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Brightmail We're currently investigating anti-spam products and are particularly interested in any products that allow the end user the ability to have some control over what is considered spam and what is not. Ideally, we'd like a product that places suspected spam into a separate folder within the clients' mailboxes where they can then deal with it themselves. In addition, we'd like for this to be a completely server-based solution. I know some products allow you to append a phrase to the subject of suspected spam messages so that users can then set up rules in Outlook to move those messages to a folder, but we'd prefer to have this happen automatically (without user intervention). The only product I've seen so far that can do this is Brightmail. Is anyone using Brightmail for Exchange? Are there any other products out there that would accomplish our goals? We're running Exchange 2000 SP2 and have about 2000 users. Thanks, Abby _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADC vs. Exmerge
Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC vs. Exmerge
For one, you would lose your single instance. Not sure how important this is for you. M pie, it's nearly lunch time here... Sander -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 September 2002 11:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC vs. Exmerge
I once heaved a couple of hundred users between two exchange servers (both 5.5 though). I have not used Exmerge with a 5.5 and 2000 combination. How are you planning to link your accounts with your mailboxes, Exchange 2000 is radically different than NT4.0 with Exchange 5.5 What are your objections against ADC? I moved my organization (three different sites) over from NT4.0 with Exchange 5.5 to Windows 2000 with Exchange 2000. I got to know the ADSI editor pretty well after that, but hey it worked in the end ...:-) Sander -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 September 2002 11:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge Not too important. We only have 1 site. If I exmerge, do I not get all the rich Exchange info tacked onto the user accounts? Aaron -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge For one, you would lose your single instance. Not sure how important this is for you. M pie, it's nearly lunch time here... Sander -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 September 2002 11:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ADC vs. Exmerge
Hi, When I moved to a new 2000 server, I exported the Public Folders to PST's and all of the permission/ownership setting were lost. But I don't know if that is normal, or if I did something wrong. AW On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, you wrote: Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC vs. Exmerge
I've moved quite a few organisations from 5.5 to 2000, and I've stuck with the ADC and the move-mailbox method. This has also included some dodgy 5.5 installations. Clean up the 5.5 install before the migration; delete unwanted connectors, mailboxes, public folders, etc. Also, as part of the migration, if you do it right, you should also remove zombie permissions from public folders and the like. By the time you move the mailboxes, your 5.5 system should be pretty clean anyway. I'd normally choose the move-mailbox method over Exmerge. Neil -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 25 September 2002 10:30 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: ADC vs. Exmerge Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC vs. Exmerge
Thanks for the input everyone. I have nothing against the ADC. In fact, I would rather do it that way since it seems to be the most recommended. I have used exmerge to migrate from 5.5 to 2k, but in a much smaller environment. I've already done most of the clean up stuff like ntdsnomatch and the consistency adjuster and I would say our 5.5 server is pretty clean. I think I will just tell my fellow coworker to go take a long walk off a short pier. Thanks again, Aaron -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 3:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge I've moved quite a few organisations from 5.5 to 2000, and I've stuck with the ADC and the move-mailbox method. This has also included some dodgy 5.5 installations. Clean up the 5.5 install before the migration; delete unwanted connectors, mailboxes, public folders, etc. Also, as part of the migration, if you do it right, you should also remove zombie permissions from public folders and the like. By the time you move the mailboxes, your 5.5 system should be pretty clean anyway. I'd normally choose the move-mailbox method over Exmerge. Neil -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 25 September 2002 10:30 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: ADC vs. Exmerge Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: malformed address
The actual address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dave Stevens IT Network Support- Mail Administrator email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: malformed address The email address is SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: malformed address We received the following NDR, noting an error 553, malformed address...I checked google, but most of the links pertained to non-ascii characters, which this is not the case. Can anyone shed some light on this problem? The email address is correct (as listed in exchange administrator)... exchange 5.5/sp4. dave From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failure Sent RCPT TO:SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Received 553 malformed address: SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Could not deliver mail to this user. * End of message *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Authentication Problem
In Outlook XP, go to the tools menu and select e-mail accounts. Make sure the radio button next to View or change existing e-mail accounts is checked and click next. Highlight the proper account and click Change. Click the More Settings button.. Click on the Outgoing Server tab, check the box next to My outgoing server (SMTP) requires authentication and enter a username and password. That should do it. Mike Morrison Staff System Engineer Fletcher Allen Health Care -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP Authentication Problem There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator. server.domain.com #5.5.0 smtp;553 Authentication is required to send mail as [EMAIL PROTECTED] I continue to recieve this message when i try to send an email to a peticular domain. The strange thing is that it works on at least one user here, but there are several others that cant send mail there. We are running W2K and E2K both with latest service packs. All the users are using Outlook XP. Thanks in advance. The recipient is able to recieve mail from others. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: malformed address
So what happens when you send to that address without the SMTP: prepended to it (as Mike O'toole pointed out a while ago)? Mike Morrison Staff System Engineer Fletcher Allen Health Care -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 7:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: malformed address The actual address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dave Stevens IT Network Support- Mail Administrator email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: malformed address The email address is SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: malformed address We received the following NDR, noting an error 553, malformed address...I checked google, but most of the links pertained to non-ascii characters, which this is not the case. Can anyone shed some light on this problem? The email address is correct (as listed in exchange administrator)... exchange 5.5/sp4. dave From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failure Sent RCPT TO:SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Received 553 malformed address: SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Could not deliver mail to this user. * End of message *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC vs. Exmerge
I had no problems with ADC. Synched the directories and PFs and then moved the mailboxes over, the natural way - right-click/Exchange Tasks/Move mailbox. It worked beautifully. But you have to know what you are doing when you are working with ADC. Nice thing is that ADC preserves permissions on mailboxes and PFs, maintains memberships in Distribution Lists, etc. Exmerge will not work on PFs. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 5:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC vs. Exmerge
ExMerge will not destroy all your rich Exchange info. But your storage may balloon tremendously. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 5:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge Not too important. We only have 1 site. If I exmerge, do I not get all the rich Exchange info tacked onto the user accounts? Aaron -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge For one, you would lose your single instance. Not sure how important this is for you. M pie, it's nearly lunch time here... Sander -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 September 2002 11:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC vs. Exmerge
Yeah ADC makes you want to learn ADSI Edit :) -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 6:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge I once heaved a couple of hundred users between two exchange servers (both 5.5 though). I have not used Exmerge with a 5.5 and 2000 combination. How are you planning to link your accounts with your mailboxes, Exchange 2000 is radically different than NT4.0 with Exchange 5.5 What are your objections against ADC? I moved my organization (three different sites) over from NT4.0 with Exchange 5.5 to Windows 2000 with Exchange 2000. I got to know the ADSI editor pretty well after that, but hey it worked in the end ...:-) Sander -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 September 2002 11:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge Not too important. We only have 1 site. If I exmerge, do I not get all the rich Exchange info tacked onto the user accounts? Aaron -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge For one, you would lose your single instance. Not sure how important this is for you. M pie, it's nearly lunch time here... Sander -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 September 2002 11:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: ADC vs. Exmerge
This is normal occurrence. -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 6:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: ADC vs. Exmerge Hi, When I moved to a new 2000 server, I exported the Public Folders to PST's and all of the permission/ownership setting were lost. But I don't know if that is normal, or if I did something wrong. AW On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, you wrote: Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC vs. Exmerge
I would say use ExMerge as a last resort, if you can't move some mailbox(es) using the natural way for some reason. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 7:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge Thanks for the input everyone. I have nothing against the ADC. In fact, I would rather do it that way since it seems to be the most recommended. I have used exmerge to migrate from 5.5 to 2k, but in a much smaller environment. I've already done most of the clean up stuff like ntdsnomatch and the consistency adjuster and I would say our 5.5 server is pretty clean. I think I will just tell my fellow coworker to go take a long walk off a short pier. Thanks again, Aaron -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 3:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge I've moved quite a few organisations from 5.5 to 2000, and I've stuck with the ADC and the move-mailbox method. This has also included some dodgy 5.5 installations. Clean up the 5.5 install before the migration; delete unwanted connectors, mailboxes, public folders, etc. Also, as part of the migration, if you do it right, you should also remove zombie permissions from public folders and the like. By the time you move the mailboxes, your 5.5 system should be pretty clean anyway. I'd normally choose the move-mailbox method over Exmerge. Neil -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 25 September 2002 10:30 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: ADC vs. Exmerge Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you.
RE: ADC vs. Exmerge
When I started working for this company, I inherited an Active Directory that had been schema-extended with a Beta version of ADC. So it took a few months to straighten it out :) And we lived all that time in a combination Exchange 5.5/Windows 2000 Active Directory world. But in the end ADC worked great and everything got migrated. I was not able to install an Exchange 2000 server as an additional server into the existing Exchange 5.5 org. It failed again and again and again... The setup ran fine but after the setup the 5.5 server did not see the 2000 server and vice versa. I ended up installing a second Exchange 5.5 server into the existing 5.5 org, then upgrading that new server to 2000 (and getting the original 5.5 server engaged in that). A little bit off the beaten path but it worked. The only odd thing that I see now is that if I try to un-install an Exchange server, it tells me that the prerequisites for un-installation are not met because there is no such object on the server. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 6:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge I've moved quite a few organisations from 5.5 to 2000, and I've stuck with the ADC and the move-mailbox method. This has also included some dodgy 5.5 installations. Clean up the 5.5 install before the migration; delete unwanted connectors, mailboxes, public folders, etc. Also, as part of the migration, if you do it right, you should also remove zombie permissions from public folders and the like. By the time you move the mailboxes, your 5.5 system should be pretty clean anyway. I'd normally choose the move-mailbox method over Exmerge. Neil -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 25 September 2002 10:30 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: ADC vs. Exmerge Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brightmail
Hehe that sounds like Hotmail new strategy - reject 99% of mail and chances are most spam will be killed. -Original Message- From: Alberto Faccioli . [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 3:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brightmail NEMX seems to have good tools for spam filtering (and more). Server based (with user-specific rules), use RBL, and run on MSX 2K/5.5 and SBS4.5/2K. http://www.nemx.com/products/index.asp But I never heard of NEMX on this list other than one satisfied comment in early September: I'm using it succesfuly. It quarantines about 2000 messages a day of wich 20 are legit messages. Anybody else out there has any other experience to share? Alberto -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brightmail CloudMark is also a client app. Runs ok most of them. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 18:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brightmail I'm running a copy of IHateSpam from Sunbelt (www.sunbelt-software.com). Seems to work well. This is not a server-based solution, but does most of the other things you want. You could add it to a standard image. David -Original Message- From: ITS.Teams.TNT.Mailing-Lists.MailingList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Brightmail We're currently investigating anti-spam products and are particularly interested in any products that allow the end user the ability to have some control over what is considered spam and what is not. Ideally, we'd like a product that places suspected spam into a separate folder within the clients' mailboxes where they can then deal with it themselves. In addition, we'd like for this to be a completely server-based solution. I know some products allow you to append a phrase to the subject of suspected spam messages so that users can then set up rules in Outlook to move those messages to a folder, but we'd prefer to have this happen automatically (without user intervention). The only product I've seen so far that can do this is Brightmail. Is anyone using Brightmail for Exchange? Are there any other products out there that would accomplish our goals? We're running Exchange 2000 SP2 and have about 2000 users. Thanks, Abby _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem creating top level PF's in Exch5.5
Ladies and gentlemen, I'm trying to create some top level public folders on our Exch 5.5 server and for some reason I can't... Each time I attempt to create the PF, I get a message stating that I don't have proper permissions. I've STW and checked the archives and I can find plenty of references to creating PF's and permissions, etc. in Exch2000, but nothing for Exch 5.5... I believe I've set myself the proper permissions in Exch. Admin for the public store which should allow me to create folders, but still no luck. I know I'm probably being really obtuse here, but hopefully someone can throw me a rope and show me what I've missed. Thanks! Joe Pochedley In the end, if you have cables like spaghetti on the floor and things only connect when you swear at them, your network is perfectly normal. - James Gaskin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA In the DMZ
I am moving our OWA server to the DMZ this weekend and know that I have to statically map port numbers for the Information Store and the Directory Store. Microsoft says do not assign port numbers immediately above 1023. Are there any recommendations as to what port numbers should be mapped? I have read Q 259240 and Q 148732 Thanks for any advice. Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material immediately. Whilst this email has been swept for viruses, you should carry out your own virus check before opening any attachment. Oxford Natural Products Plc accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or interception or interruption of this email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sp3
Has anyone in a multi hosting enviroment installed sp3 for 2k and exchange? Any hick ups!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem creating top level PF's in Exch5.5
So, under Info Store Site Config/ Top Level Folder Creation tab, you are allowed to create folders? -Original Message- From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem creating top level PF's in Exch5.5 Ladies and gentlemen, I'm trying to create some top level public folders on our Exch 5.5 server and for some reason I can't... Each time I attempt to create the PF, I get a message stating that I don't have proper permissions. I've STW and checked the archives and I can find plenty of references to creating PF's and permissions, etc. in Exch2000, but nothing for Exch 5.5... I believe I've set myself the proper permissions in Exch. Admin for the public store which should allow me to create folders, but still no luck. I know I'm probably being really obtuse here, but hopefully someone can throw me a rope and show me what I've missed. Thanks! Joe Pochedley In the end, if you have cables like spaghetti on the floor and things only connect when you swear at them, your network is perfectly normal. - James Gaskin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sp3
Yep, and they work fine! Yours, Julian Stone This message sent from Exchange 2000 SP3 build 6249.4 Netstore - Europe's Leading Application Service Provider Tel: +44 (0) 1344 444349 Mobile: +44 (0) 7710 122 312 Fax: +44 (0) 207 681 1238 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LOCATION: http://www.netstore.net/contact/location.htm HomePage: http://www.netstore.net/ -Original Message- From: Matt Natkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: sp3 Has anyone in a multi hosting enviroment installed sp3 for 2k and exchange? Any hick ups!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem creating top level PF's in Exch5.5
Duh, I knew it would be something simple. Guess I should've mentioned that I used to have the permission and nobody had made a top level PF for probably a year now (but I was in a rush and frustrated, not the best time to write a good problem description)... Actually, all the names (of people who are supposed to have the permissions) were missing from that tab. Never thought to check it because, of course, why would my name magically have been removed? Ah well, something a little whacky there, have to keep an eye on it... Thanks again. Joe Pochedley In the end, if you have cables like spaghetti on the floor and things only connect when you swear at them, your network is perfectly normal. - James Gaskin -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem creating top level PF's in Exch5.5 So, under Info Store Site Config/ Top Level Folder Creation tab, you are allowed to create folders? -Original Message- From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem creating top level PF's in Exch5.5 Ladies and gentlemen, I'm trying to create some top level public folders on our Exch 5.5 server and for some reason I can't... Each time I attempt to create the PF, I get a message stating that I don't have proper permissions. I've STW and checked the archives and I can find plenty of references to creating PF's and permissions, etc. in Exch2000, but nothing for Exch 5.5... I believe I've set myself the proper permissions in Exch. Admin for the public store which should allow me to create folders, but still no luck. I know I'm probably being really obtuse here, but hopefully someone can throw me a rope and show me what I've missed. Thanks! Joe Pochedley In the end, if you have cables like spaghetti on the floor and things only connect when you swear at them, your network is perfectly normal. - James Gaskin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message rejected
Friggin Lyris. I rarely tell anyone to shut their pie hole (Unless it's Andy David). Instead you shoudl ask him to document his argument in detail so you can consider it. At the moment, his assertion is too vague to consider as valid or not. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/25/2002 4:29 AM Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron __ __ This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. __ __ NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message rejected
m pie... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message rejected Friggin Lyris. I rarely tell anyone to shut their pie hole (Unless it's Andy David). Instead you shoudl ask him to document his argument in detail so you can consider it. At the moment, his assertion is too vague to consider as valid or not. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/25/2002 4:29 AM Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron __ __ This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. __ __ NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message rejected
You like pie? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message rejected m pie... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message rejected Friggin Lyris. I rarely tell anyone to shut their pie hole (Unless it's Andy David). Instead you shoudl ask him to document his argument in detail so you can consider it. At the moment, his assertion is too vague to consider as valid or not. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/25/2002 4:29 AM Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron __ __ This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. __ __ NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GMT time zone stamp
My exchange 2000 computer is set to time zone -6:00. Why would the smtp banner show -5:00 ? Can I change this? - Marty Yantzie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: GMT time zone stamp
We're currently using daylight savings time which would account for 1 hour difference with GMT. -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 September 2002 16:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: GMT time zone stamp My exchange 2000 computer is set to time zone -6:00. Why would the smtp banner show -5:00 ? Can I change this? - Marty Yantzie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC vs. Exmerge
Nope it happened to me tooreal pain in the ass to set those all back up -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Allison M. Wittstock Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 3:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: ADC vs. Exmerge Hi, When I moved to a new 2000 server, I exported the Public Folders to PST's and all of the permission/ownership setting were lost. But I don't know if that is normal, or if I did something wrong. AW On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, you wrote: Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron __ __ This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: GMT time zone stamp
I looked at the time zone settings and unchecked the Automatically adjust for Daylight Savings box. Now my smtp banner is correct, but I still receive some emails coming from another smtp server that show that they were sent 1 hour later than they were. Problem: I have an iis smtp server sending an email when a form is submitted. This machine is gmt -6:00. It then sends the mail direct to my exchange server which is also gmt -6:00. when I receive the mail the sent column shows 1 hour later than it was received. - Marty Yantzie -Original Message- From: Hanna, Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:44 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Mailing List Conversation: GMT time zone stamp Subject: RE: GMT time zone stamp We're currently using daylight savings time which would account for 1 hour difference with GMT. -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 September 2002 16:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: GMT time zone stamp My exchange 2000 computer is set to time zone -6:00. Why would the smtp banner show -5:00 ? Can I change this? - Marty Yantzie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: GMT time zone stamp
The received stamp is handled by the Exchange server, the sent by the client... So it sounds like -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: GMT time zone stamp I looked at the time zone settings and unchecked the Automatically adjust for Daylight Savings box. Er... Do you live in a place where you use Daylight Savings Time? If so, you really don't want to do that. Now my smtp banner is correct, but I still receive some emails coming from another smtp server that show that they were sent 1 hour later than they were. The Exchange server is receiving mail from everywhere else and the time appears to be correct... But from one server things look odd. Now if one were to troubleshoot using the principle of least surprise, where would you point to for the likely cause? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: GMT time zone stamp
but, we're currently using daylight savings time. -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 September 2002 16:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: GMT time zone stamp I looked at the time zone settings and unchecked the Automatically adjust for Daylight Savings box. Now my smtp banner is correct, but I still receive some emails coming from another smtp server that show that they were sent 1 hour later than they were. Problem: I have an iis smtp server sending an email when a form is submitted. This machine is gmt -6:00. It then sends the mail direct to my exchange server which is also gmt -6:00. when I receive the mail the sent column shows 1 hour later than it was received. - Marty Yantzie -Original Message- From: Hanna, Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:44 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Mailing List Conversation: GMT time zone stamp Subject: RE: GMT time zone stamp We're currently using daylight savings time which would account for 1 hour difference with GMT. -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 September 2002 16:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: GMT time zone stamp My exchange 2000 computer is set to time zone -6:00. Why would the smtp banner show -5:00 ? Can I change this? - Marty Yantzie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message rejected
Hi All I know I'm opening myself up to getting flamed here, but I have to ask What is Friggin Lyris? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message rejected Friggin Lyris. I rarely tell anyone to shut their pie hole (Unless it's Andy David). Instead you shoudl ask him to document his argument in detail so you can consider it. At the moment, his assertion is too vague to consider as valid or not. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/25/2002 4:29 AM Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron __ __ This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. __ __ NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sp3
No hickups butI only installed it on the front-end servers so far and some non-production back-ends. -Original Message- From: Matt Natkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: sp3 Has anyone in a multi hosting enviroment installed sp3 for 2k and exchange? Any hick ups!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message rejected
An awesome garage band from Seattle. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message rejected Hi All I know I'm opening myself up to getting flamed here, but I have to ask What is Friggin Lyris? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message rejected Friggin Lyris. I rarely tell anyone to shut their pie hole (Unless it's Andy David). Instead you shoudl ask him to document his argument in detail so you can consider it. At the moment, his assertion is too vague to consider as valid or not. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/25/2002 4:29 AM Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron __ __ This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. __ __ NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The dreaded POP3
exch5.5 sp4 with post hf's client OE4 Company bought software, uses only pop3. No way to change this now (would that they would've talked to me BEFORE buying software that uses pop3). Made the mailbox. Server and mailbox enabled for pop3. Send mail, do send-receive, message is not downloaded. No errors in pop3.log or smtp.log. Messages send fine. Checked via full client, messages are in inbox. Any ideas on why they won't download? (please suspend all comments about using mapi. thanks.) Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Distribution lists and ADC
Hi, Currently in mixed mode with Exch 5.5 sp4 and Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3. I have a couple of new users whose mailboxes were set up in Exchange 2000 (not migrated from exch55)they are in a few distribution lists (_everyone, _attorneys, _corporate etc), they can get mails send to all distribution lists except _everyone group( the _everyone group is different than the AD everyone group, starts with an underscore). I have an ADC connector with 2 way replication. On the Exchange 55 GAL, I do not see their names, on the Exchange 2000 default GAL I do see their names. I manually replicate ADC, did not seem to work. Any ideas? TIA Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
support for developers
I know there is PSS for help from MS, but is there another number for assistance for programming of Exchange 2K. I have a developer tyring to create a OWA forwarding feature for users that he is stuggling with. Or better yet, I'm buying if someone has already created one. - Jon Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMC as relay system (off topic)
Exchange 5.5 SP4. Sorry to post this again. Maybe someone new has some information. Well the system that processes the @UC.EDU aliases for the University finally took a big hit. Its a VMS system running PMDF and is run in a different department. We've been asked to look at alternative replacement systems. The system is processing about 40,000 inbound messages a day. I really like the Exchange IMC since it's menu driven and I have monitors in place that can page when something happens. Also it does some validation work, such as SMTP address already used and so forth. Couple of questions. 1) Is anyone else shoving 40,000+ inbound messages through an IMC? We would have a dedicated box for this function in the existing site and would only be used for inbound messages destined for @UC.EDU. It would also route messages to other e-mail systems such as our student POP/Unix based messaging system for those users whos alias points to an alternate system. 2) Is there some other 3rd party product that is user friendly (versus text updates) that might be a good replacement that anyone might want to recommend? 3) We could go with a Linux system with an SMTP mailer. We do have a administrator on staff here that runs the POP system and a Linux deployment was mention. I don't like the fact that its line based and additions are not immediate and require recompiling (maybe don't have that term right). Thanks! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The dreaded POP3
Post errors -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The dreaded POP3 exch5.5 sp4 with post hf's client OE4 Company bought software, uses only pop3. No way to change this now (would that they would've talked to me BEFORE buying software that uses pop3). Made the mailbox. Server and mailbox enabled for pop3. Send mail, do send-receive, message is not downloaded. No errors in pop3.log or smtp.log. Messages send fine. Checked via full client, messages are in inbox. Any ideas on why they won't download? (please suspend all comments about using mapi. thanks.) Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
POLL
What's your preference for SPAM prevention? MailSweeper or SurfControl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POLL
surfcontrol -Original Message- From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POLL What's your preference for SPAM prevention? MailSweeper or SurfControl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POLL
Real meat. -Original Message- From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POLL What's your preference for SPAM prevention? MailSweeper or SurfControl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC as relay system (off topic)
Exchange 2000 SMTP is quite good, providing you don't skimp on hardware. I have a couple of Exchange SMTP gateways that are load-balanced with WLBS. One is a dual CPU, 650MHz, 512 MB RAM. The other one is single CPU, 800MHz, 512 MB RAM. They are probably relaying ~50,000 messages per day and do not seem to be stressed. I like Exchange 2000 as SMTP relay because the queue management is pretty nice. I would not recommend using IPSwitch Imail as an SMTP gateway - it chokes when it has to send a lot of mail at once. Rockliffe Mailsite is pretty good. It also has aliasing capability. For example you could create a wildcard alias *@company.com - *@exchange.company.com and it will rewrite the addresses and reroute mail. However I have also seen MailSite choke on large amounts of mail. And queue management is not that untuitive. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC as relay system (off topic) Exchange 5.5 SP4. Sorry to post this again. Maybe someone new has some information. Well the system that processes the @UC.EDU aliases for the University finally took a big hit. Its a VMS system running PMDF and is run in a different department. We've been asked to look at alternative replacement systems. The system is processing about 40,000 inbound messages a day. I really like the Exchange IMC since it's menu driven and I have monitors in place that can page when something happens. Also it does some validation work, such as SMTP address already used and so forth. Couple of questions. 1) Is anyone else shoving 40,000+ inbound messages through an IMC? We would have a dedicated box for this function in the existing site and would only be used for inbound messages destined for @UC.EDU. It would also route messages to other e-mail systems such as our student POP/Unix based messaging system for those users whos alias points to an alternate system. 2) Is there some other 3rd party product that is user friendly (versus text updates) that might be a good replacement that anyone might want to recommend? 3) We could go with a Linux system with an SMTP mailer. We do have a administrator on staff here that runs the POP system and a Linux deployment was mention. I don't like the fact that its line based and additions are not immediate and require recompiling (maybe don't have that term right). Thanks! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POLL
abstinence :) -Original Message- From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POLL What's your preference for SPAM prevention? MailSweeper or SurfControl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POLL
I would choose SurfControl. -Original Message- From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POLL surfcontrol -Original Message- From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POLL What's your preference for SPAM prevention? MailSweeper or SurfControl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POLL
MAILSweeper - since I haven't used SurfControl -Original Message- From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: POLL What's your preference for SPAM prevention? MailSweeper or SurfControl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The dreaded POP3
I have noticed on a few occasions that if mailbox alias = NT user ID, then POP3 works fine. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The dreaded POP3 exch5.5 sp4 with post hf's client OE4 Company bought software, uses only pop3. No way to change this now (would that they would've talked to me BEFORE buying software that uses pop3). Made the mailbox. Server and mailbox enabled for pop3. Send mail, do send-receive, message is not downloaded. No errors in pop3.log or smtp.log. Messages send fine. Checked via full client, messages are in inbox. Any ideas on why they won't download? (please suspend all comments about using mapi. thanks.) Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POLL
Mailsweeper -Original Message- From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POLL What's your preference for SPAM prevention? MailSweeper or SurfControl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The dreaded POP3
User error? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The dreaded POP3 exch5.5 sp4 with post hf's client OE4 Company bought software, uses only pop3. No way to change this now (would that they would've talked to me BEFORE buying software that uses pop3). Made the mailbox. Server and mailbox enabled for pop3. Send mail, do send-receive, message is not downloaded. No errors in pop3.log or smtp.log. Messages send fine. Checked via full client, messages are in inbox. Any ideas on why they won't download? (please suspend all comments about using mapi. thanks.) Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: support for developers
Yes, you can buy MSDN support incidents in a similar way to PSS incidents. -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: support for developers I know there is PSS for help from MS, but is there another number for assistance for programming of Exchange 2K. I have a developer tyring to create a OWA forwarding feature for users that he is stuggling with. Or better yet, I'm buying if someone has already created one. - Jon Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC as relay system (off topic)
Exchange 5.5 SP4. Sorry to post this again. Maybe someone new has some information. Well the system that processes the @UC.EDU aliases for the University finally took a big hit. Its a VMS system running PMDF and is run in a different department. We've been asked to look at alternative replacement systems. The system is processing about 40,000 inbound messages a day. I really like the Exchange IMC since it's menu driven and I have monitors in place that can page when something happens. Also it does some validation work, such as SMTP address already used and so forth. Couple of questions. 1) Is anyone else shoving 40,000+ inbound messages through an IMC? An hour? Not, me. A day? Used to. We would have a dedicated box for this function in the existing site and would only be used for inbound messages destined for @UC.EDU. It would also route messages to other e-mail systems such as our student POP/Unix based messaging system for those users whos alias points to an alternate system. 2) Is there some other 3rd party product that is user friendly (versus text updates) that might be a good replacement that anyone might want to recommend? www.mail-resources.com | web links | server | directory management 3) We could go with a Linux system with an SMTP mailer. We do have a administrator on staff here that runs the POP system and a Linux deployment was mention. I don't like the fact that its line based and additions are not immediate and require recompiling (maybe don't have that term right). _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The dreaded POP3
No errors. See line 10, no errors in pop3.log. Logs in to the server fine. Acts like it's checking for mail, just doesn't take any of it. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:35 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: The dreaded POP3 Subject: RE: The dreaded POP3 Post errors -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The dreaded POP3 exch5.5 sp4 with post hf's client OE4 Company bought software, uses only pop3. No way to change this now (would that they would've talked to me BEFORE buying software that uses pop3). Made the mailbox. Server and mailbox enabled for pop3. Send mail, do send-receive, message is not downloaded. No errors in pop3.log or smtp.log. Messages send fine. Checked via full client, messages are in inbox. Any ideas on why they won't download? (please suspend all comments about using mapi. thanks.) Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POLL
After killing people who ask the same question for the n hundredth time this year, I'm usually too tired to prevent spam. :^* -Original Message- From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POLL What's your preference for SPAM prevention? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The dreaded POP3
Can you manually retrieve mail via POP3? If so, then yopu're asking the wrong group what's up with your 3rd party software. If you can't manually retrieve your mail via POP3, you'll have an error message which will help us to help you. Off to the pub now to drink my lunch. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The dreaded POP3 No errors. See line 10, no errors in pop3.log. Logs in to the server fine. Acts like it's checking for mail, just doesn't take any of it. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:35 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: The dreaded POP3 Subject: RE: The dreaded POP3 Post errors -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The dreaded POP3 exch5.5 sp4 with post hf's client OE4 Company bought software, uses only pop3. No way to change this now (would that they would've talked to me BEFORE buying software that uses pop3). Made the mailbox. Server and mailbox enabled for pop3. Send mail, do send-receive, message is not downloaded. No errors in pop3.log or smtp.log. Messages send fine. Checked via full client, messages are in inbox. Any ideas on why they won't download? (please suspend all comments about using mapi. thanks.) Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The dreaded POP3
Telnet to port 110, auth. As the user and see if you can list the messages -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The dreaded POP3 Can you manually retrieve mail via POP3? If so, then yopu're asking the wrong group what's up with your 3rd party software. If you can't manually retrieve your mail via POP3, you'll have an error message which will help us to help you. Off to the pub now to drink my lunch. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The dreaded POP3 No errors. See line 10, no errors in pop3.log. Logs in to the server fine. Acts like it's checking for mail, just doesn't take any of it. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:35 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: The dreaded POP3 Subject: RE: The dreaded POP3 Post errors -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The dreaded POP3 exch5.5 sp4 with post hf's client OE4 Company bought software, uses only pop3. No way to change this now (would that they would've talked to me BEFORE buying software that uses pop3). Made the mailbox. Server and mailbox enabled for pop3. Send mail, do send-receive, message is not downloaded. No errors in pop3.log or smtp.log. Messages send fine. Checked via full client, messages are in inbox. Any ideas on why they won't download? (please suspend all comments about using mapi. thanks.) Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The dreaded POP3
Well, does the pop3.log show the successful retrieval of the messages? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The dreaded POP3 No errors. See line 10, no errors in pop3.log. Logs in to the server fine. Acts like it's checking for mail, just doesn't take any of it. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:35 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: The dreaded POP3 Subject: RE: The dreaded POP3 Post errors -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The dreaded POP3 exch5.5 sp4 with post hf's client OE4 Company bought software, uses only pop3. No way to change this now (would that they would've talked to me BEFORE buying software that uses pop3). Made the mailbox. Server and mailbox enabled for pop3. Send mail, do send-receive, message is not downloaded. No errors in pop3.log or smtp.log. Messages send fine. Checked via full client, messages are in inbox. Any ideas on why they won't download? (please suspend all comments about using mapi. thanks.) Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADC Synching
Environment: Running in mixed mode, Exchange 5.5, SP4 on Win2k, SP2. E2k, SP3 on Wink2k, SP2. Scenario: Add a new User to one of our other thirteen (13) 5.5 servers and replicate with the 5.5 bridgehead. Then go to ADC, find that CA between the site and AD, click on Schedule, tick off Replicate the entire directory, blah, blah blah, apply and the do a replicate now. How soon have others seen the changes flow from 5.5 to show up in the E2k Global Address List in the Outlook client? Geoff... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hotmail problems?
Signature? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hotmail problems? You should see the length of my, um, mever mind. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hotmail problems? I love my Hotmail spam. Where else can I get cheap car insurance announcements and learn how to quit my job by spamming everybody else with every known cure for everything. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hotmail problems? Yahright! Like hotmail is going to blacklist anyone! ROFL!! -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hotmail problems? I think they count how many bad addresses are in a list and if too many they terminate connection (and maybe temporarily blacklist you) -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hotmail problems? I've had trouble when users send mail to a DL that contains numerous contacts w/ hotmail addresses. Anyone know if there's a limit on how many addresses a message can be sent to at hotmail before an anti-spam threshold kicks in? Needless to say, the message my user wants to send out is most definately not spam. Jeremy -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hotmail problems? Yes, we have a few outbound messages waiting for hotmail to accept them for the last few hours. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hotmail problems? Hi all. I am having intermittent problems sending to Hotmail. Some of the Hotmail servers seem to reject connections. If I send a message 3-4 times, eventually it hits a good Hotmail server and gets delivered. Has anyone else seen such behavior recently? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Senior Exchange Administrator iNNERHOST - http://www.innerhost.com Complex Hosting in a Global Environment _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: SMTP Authentication Problem
that is only an option if you are setup to use a internet mail account (pop3). We are setup to connect directly to the exchange server _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC Synching
a few seconds, maybe a minute -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC Synching Environment: Running in mixed mode, Exchange 5.5, SP4 on Win2k, SP2. E2k, SP3 on Wink2k, SP2. Scenario: Add a new User to one of our other thirteen (13) 5.5 servers and replicate with the 5.5 bridgehead. Then go to ADC, find that CA between the site and AD, click on Schedule, tick off Replicate the entire directory, blah, blah blah, apply and the do a replicate now. How soon have others seen the changes flow from 5.5 to show up in the E2k Global Address List in the Outlook client? Geoff... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POLL
Titan II ICBM http://home.teleport.com/~boelling/titan.html -Original Message- From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POLL What's your preference for SPAM prevention? MailSweeper or SurfControl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The dreaded POP3
Ok in order (sort-of): Andrey - same exch/nt id - ok this worked with one of them. This does create a problem in that exchange allows longer aliases than NT (read, one of them is too long). Andy - log show success - No, it shows no messages to retrieve (+OK 0 0) Casey, Chris, I'll get back to you on the telnet. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:09 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: The dreaded POP3 Subject: RE: The dreaded POP3 Well, does the pop3.log show the successful retrieval of the messages? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The dreaded POP3 No errors. See line 10, no errors in pop3.log. Logs in to the server fine. Acts like it's checking for mail, just doesn't take any of it. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:35 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: The dreaded POP3 Subject: RE: The dreaded POP3 Post errors -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The dreaded POP3 exch5.5 sp4 with post hf's client OE4 Company bought software, uses only pop3. No way to change this now (would that they would've talked to me BEFORE buying software that uses pop3). Made the mailbox. Server and mailbox enabled for pop3. Send mail, do send-receive, message is not downloaded. No errors in pop3.log or smtp.log. Messages send fine. Checked via full client, messages are in inbox. Any ideas on why they won't download? (please suspend all comments about using mapi. thanks.) Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POLL
SS-27 is better http://www.softwar.net/ss27.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POLL Titan II ICBM http://home.teleport.com/~boelling/titan.html -Original Message- From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POLL What's your preference for SPAM prevention? MailSweeper or SurfControl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The dreaded POP3
Ok. Found the answer. In outlook express, tools - accounts - account name - properties - servers - incoming mail server - *log on using - Under account name, use the format: ntdomain\ntaccount\exchangeaccount And guess where myself and my coworker found this? www.swynk.com/friends/janssen/telnet_POP3_commands.asp b -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:43 PM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: The dreaded POP3 Ok in order (sort-of): Andrey - same exch/nt id - ok this worked with one of them. This does create a problem in that exchange allows longer aliases than NT (read, one of them is too long). Andy - log show success - No, it shows no messages to retrieve (+OK 0 0) Casey, Chris, I'll get back to you on the telnet. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:09 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: The dreaded POP3 Subject: RE: The dreaded POP3 Well, does the pop3.log show the successful retrieval of the messages? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The dreaded POP3 No errors. See line 10, no errors in pop3.log. Logs in to the server fine. Acts like it's checking for mail, just doesn't take any of it. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:35 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: The dreaded POP3 Subject: RE: The dreaded POP3 Post errors -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The dreaded POP3 exch5.5 sp4 with post hf's client OE4 Company bought software, uses only pop3. No way to change this now (would that they would've talked to me BEFORE buying software that uses pop3). Made the mailbox. Server and mailbox enabled for pop3. Send mail, do send-receive, message is not downloaded. No errors in pop3.log or smtp.log. Messages send fine. Checked via full client, messages are in inbox. Any ideas on why they won't download? (please suspend all comments about using mapi. thanks.) Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POLL
I just use the delete button -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Williams Scott CTR Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POLL What's your preference for SPAM prevention? MailSweeper or SurfControl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP will not send
List, Can someone please point me in the right direction here? I have an IIS system (www11-sfb) that I want to send mail. When I telnet to the port it works fine and sends mail. This is done from the local machine. See logs below (Telnet from port) for details. But when I use a php script to do it from a web page the mail does not send. It initiates the initial commands but then does not establish the outbound connection. See log below (From PHP script) for details. Can anyone provide me with where to look for the issue? - John Q #Software: Microsoft Internet Information Services 5.0 #Version: 1.0 #Date: 2002-09-25 19:18:28 #Fields: date time c-ip cs-username s-sitename s-computername s-ip s-port cs-method sc-win32-status sc-bytes time-taken cs-host cs(Cookie) cs(Referer) (Telnet from port) 2002-09-25 19:18:28 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 HELO 0 50 15 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:36 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 MAIL 0 37 15 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:44 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 0 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:44 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 57 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:48 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 c 0 32 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:56 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 31 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 DATA 0 139 11469 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 - OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 55 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 EHLO 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 38 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 HELO 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 86 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 MAIL 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 39 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 RCPT 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 48 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 DATA 0 4 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 29 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 33 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 QUIT 0 4 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 22 16 - - - (From PHP script) 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 HELO 0 50 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 MAIL 0 46 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 34 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 DATA 0 139 63 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 QUIT 63 75 0 - - - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Authentication Problem
no idea what you are talking about since you've completely oversnipped please pardon me while I head back to the pub for a nother pint or twelve. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP will not send
Are you dropping the message in the right directory? As an example here
is a simple stream text function
function SendEmailBasic(unique) {
var objFSO = Server.CreateObject(Scripting.FileSystemObject);
var stream =
objFSO.CreateTextFile(c:\\inetpub\\mailroot\\Pickup\\msg- +
Session(custid) + - + unique + .txt, true, false);
return stream;
}
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 September 2002 20:39 pm
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP will not send
List,
Can someone please point me in the right direction here? I have an IIS
system (www11-sfb) that I want to send mail.
When I telnet to the port it works fine and sends mail. This is done
from the local machine. See logs below (Telnet from port) for details.
But when I use a php script to do it from a web page the mail does not
send. It initiates the initial commands but then does not establish the
outbound connection. See log below (From PHP script) for details.
Can anyone provide me with where to look for the issue?
- John Q
#Software: Microsoft Internet Information Services 5.0
#Version: 1.0
#Date: 2002-09-25 19:18:28
#Fields: date time c-ip cs-username s-sitename s-computername s-ip
s-port cs-method sc-win32-status sc-bytes time-taken cs-host cs(Cookie)
cs(Referer) (Telnet from port) 2002-09-25 19:18:28 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1
WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 HELO 0 50 15 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:36 127.0.0.1 -
SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 MAIL 0 37 15 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:44
127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 0 0 - - - 2002-09-25
19:18:44 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 57 0 - - -
2002-09-25 19:18:48 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 c 0 32 0
- - - 2002-09-25 19:18:56 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0
RCPT 0 31 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB
127.0.0.1 0 DATA 0 139 11469 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 -
OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 55 0 - - -
2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com
OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 EHLO 0 4 0 - - -
2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com
OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 38 0 - - -
2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com
OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 HELO 0 4 0 - - -
2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com
OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 86 0 - - -
2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com
OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 MAIL 0 4 0 - - -
2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com
OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 39 0 - - -
2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com
OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 RCPT 0 4 0 - - -
2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com
OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 48 16 - - -
2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com
OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 DATA 0 4 16 - - -
2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com
OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 29 16 - - -
2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com
OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 33 16 - - -
2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com
OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 QUIT 0 4 16 - - -
2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com
OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 22 16 - - - (From
PHP script)
2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0
HELO 0 50 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1
WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 MAIL 0 46 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1
www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 34 0 - - - 2002-09-25
19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 DATA 0 139
63 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB
127.0.0.1 0 QUIT 63 75 0 - - -
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Authentication Problem
Wow. How many Coors Lites can one man drink? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Authentication Problem no idea what you are talking about since you've completely oversnipped please pardon me while I head back to the pub for a nother pint or twelve. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
host name
With Outlook, when you add host name (Microsoft Exchange server) on PC dialing in, i.e. server.domain.com, Outlook switches it to server when performing check name. Why does Outlook do this? Also, when I bring the PC in and connect to LAN, I can enter host name server and Outlook performs check name successfully. Then I take the PC and dial into the Internet, and it connects. Does Outlook maintain both host names and use the one needed? Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC Synching
Okay, with one answer, I will post the following: What could be causing the CAs in the ADC to take more than two (2) hours and sometimes longer to replicate from 5.5 to the AD. This is a big problem when an Administrator is on E2k and cannot see the new User that was created two (2) hours ago on the 5.5 server and needs to be able to put them in the proper DLs, etc. Anyone got any idea why it might take this long? TIA Geoff... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Synching a few seconds, maybe a minute -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC Synching Environment: Running in mixed mode, Exchange 5.5, SP4 on Win2k, SP2. E2k, SP3 on Wink2k, SP2. Scenario: Add a new User to one of our other thirteen (13) 5.5 servers and replicate with the 5.5 bridgehead. Then go to ADC, find that CA between the site and AD, click on Schedule, tick off Replicate the entire directory, blah, blah blah, apply and the do a replicate now. How soon have others seen the changes flow from 5.5 to show up in the E2k Global Address List in the Outlook client? Geoff... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: host name
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 3:16pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With Outlook, when you add host name (Microsoft Exchange server) on PC dialing in, i.e. server.domain.com, Outlook switches it to server when performing check name. Why does Outlook do this? Because Outlook (or, rather, MAPI) is still using the old-style flat NetBIOS namespace. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments
I am looking for some help with a clients problem with OL2002 and attachments. All was fine for a long time but now they get attachments that are corrupt. Files of 500k at the sender, get received at a piece of that size (.exe or zip files)...or, jpg or graphic files come thru but only half the pic shows. Sending from the clients PC is fine and they are using a 56k dialup thru Earthlink on their 3com LAN modem. Sender can send HTML or plain text with same result. Client has Exchange 5.5 for internal use only and the Win2k client PC is using internet mode for getting ISP mail. Any thoughts to how attachments can all of a sudden be corrupt, truncated etc.? Nothing on the client systems have changed recently. Ron Jameson James Hamlin Consulting _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments
If you check his mailbox from a machine local to the server, do the attachments show up properly? If so, they're fine on the server and the issue may be with his dialup or local software. Do small attachments work going over to him? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments I am looking for some help with a clients problem with OL2002 and attachments. All was fine for a long time but now they get attachments that are corrupt. Files of 500k at the sender, get received at a piece of that size (.exe or zip files)...or, jpg or graphic files come thru but only half the pic shows. Sending from the clients PC is fine and they are using a 56k dialup thru Earthlink on their 3com LAN modem. Sender can send HTML or plain text with same result. Client has Exchange 5.5 for internal use only and the Win2k client PC is using internet mode for getting ISP mail. Any thoughts to how attachments can all of a sudden be corrupt, truncated etc.? Nothing on the client systems have changed recently. Ron Jameson James Hamlin Consulting _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments
Email attachments go fine to hotmail account so I know they leave the senders box fine. Some attachments work...some do notno pattern of what is good/bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments If you check his mailbox from a machine local to the server, do the attachments show up properly? If so, they're fine on the server and the issue may be with his dialup or local software. Do small attachments work going over to him? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments I am looking for some help with a clients problem with OL2002 and attachments. All was fine for a long time but now they get attachments that are corrupt. Files of 500k at the sender, get received at a piece of that size (.exe or zip files)...or, jpg or graphic files come thru but only half the pic shows. Sending from the clients PC is fine and they are using a 56k dialup thru Earthlink on their 3com LAN modem. Sender can send HTML or plain text with same result. Client has Exchange 5.5 for internal use only and the Win2k client PC is using internet mode for getting ISP mail. Any thoughts to how attachments can all of a sudden be corrupt, truncated etc.? Nothing on the client systems have changed recently. Ron Jameson James Hamlin Consulting _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments
OK. Now let's answer my question. Are attachments on the Exchange server fine? If they are and show up garbled on his machine when he connects remotely, then there's a potential issue. If they show up fine all the time, then the Exchange server is out of the game and we can focus entirely on the ISP. Once we categorize each failure, we can find the common points and proceed from there. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments Email attachments go fine to hotmail account so I know they leave the senders box fine. Some attachments work...some do notno pattern of what is good/bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments If you check his mailbox from a machine local to the server, do the attachments show up properly? If so, they're fine on the server and the issue may be with his dialup or local software. Do small attachments work going over to him? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments I am looking for some help with a clients problem with OL2002 and attachments. All was fine for a long time but now they get attachments that are corrupt. Files of 500k at the sender, get received at a piece of that size (.exe or zip files)...or, jpg or graphic files come thru but only half the pic shows. Sending from the clients PC is fine and they are using a 56k dialup thru Earthlink on their 3com LAN modem. Sender can send HTML or plain text with same result. Client has Exchange 5.5 for internal use only and the Win2k client PC is using internet mode for getting ISP mail. Any thoughts to how attachments can all of a sudden be corrupt, truncated etc.? Nothing on the client systems have changed recently. Ron Jameson James Hamlin Consulting _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments
In house exchange server is not being used for internet...only internal employee email exchange. OL2002 client has both exchange internet service runningeach user pulls from their own pop server thru the common dialup connection.. Hope that clears the confusion. Sending attachments from user to user via internal exchange is fine...just the internet is flaky. Have had senders send to different ISP email accounts that the client will pull mail from (i.e. netcom and compuserve) via POP3both ISP email servers when pulling the mail will have the same result so I am thinking something on the client PC... I am trying to get them on Exchange with a DSL to eliminate the POP3 pulling...but the client is not ready yet. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments OK. Now let's answer my question. Are attachments on the Exchange server fine? If they are and show up garbled on his machine when he connects remotely, then there's a potential issue. If they show up fine all the time, then the Exchange server is out of the game and we can focus entirely on the ISP. Once we categorize each failure, we can find the common points and proceed from there. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments Email attachments go fine to hotmail account so I know they leave the senders box fine. Some attachments work...some do notno pattern of what is good/bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments If you check his mailbox from a machine local to the server, do the attachments show up properly? If so, they're fine on the server and the issue may be with his dialup or local software. Do small attachments work going over to him? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments I am looking for some help with a clients problem with OL2002 and attachments. All was fine for a long time but now they get attachments that are corrupt. Files of 500k at the sender, get received at a piece of that size (.exe or zip files)...or, jpg or graphic files come thru but only half the pic shows. Sending from the clients PC is fine and they are using a 56k dialup thru Earthlink on their 3com LAN modem. Sender can send HTML or plain text with same result. Client has Exchange 5.5 for internal use only and the Win2k client PC is using internet mode for getting ISP mail. Any thoughts to how attachments can all of a sudden be corrupt, truncated etc.? Nothing on the client systems have changed recently. Ron Jameson James Hamlin Consulting _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments
OK. Test with Outlook Express. Also test with another box connecting remotely. If the other box works just fine, it's his system. If the other box fails, it's the ISP(s). If OE succeeds, it's OL2002. If OE fails, he's got major problems and reimaging or whatever you use to FDISK and reinstall is in order. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments In house exchange server is not being used for internet...only internal employee email exchange. OL2002 client has both exchange internet service runningeach user pulls from their own pop server thru the common dialup connection.. Hope that clears the confusion. Sending attachments from user to user via internal exchange is fine...just the internet is flaky. Have had senders send to different ISP email accounts that the client will pull mail from (i.e. netcom and compuserve) via POP3both ISP email servers when pulling the mail will have the same result so I am thinking something on the client PC... I am trying to get them on Exchange with a DSL to eliminate the POP3 pulling...but the client is not ready yet. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments OK. Now let's answer my question. Are attachments on the Exchange server fine? If they are and show up garbled on his machine when he connects remotely, then there's a potential issue. If they show up fine all the time, then the Exchange server is out of the game and we can focus entirely on the ISP. Once we categorize each failure, we can find the common points and proceed from there. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments Email attachments go fine to hotmail account so I know they leave the senders box fine. Some attachments work...some do notno pattern of what is good/bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments If you check his mailbox from a machine local to the server, do the attachments show up properly? If so, they're fine on the server and the issue may be with his dialup or local software. Do small attachments work going over to him? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments I am looking for some help with a clients problem with OL2002 and attachments. All was fine for a long time but now they get attachments that are corrupt. Files of 500k at the sender, get received at a piece of that size (.exe or zip files)...or, jpg or graphic files come thru but only half the pic shows. Sending from the clients PC is fine and they are using a 56k dialup thru Earthlink on their 3com LAN modem. Sender can send HTML or plain text with same result. Client has Exchange 5.5 for internal use only and the Win2k client PC is using internet mode for getting ISP mail. Any thoughts to how attachments can all of a sudden be corrupt, truncated etc.? Nothing on the client systems have changed recently. Ron Jameson James Hamlin Consulting _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: The dreaded POP3
Oh, you were using the wrong username format? That one's covered in the FAQ as well. ;) -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/25/2002 2:21 PM Subject: RE: The dreaded POP3 Ok. Found the answer. In outlook express, tools - accounts - account name - properties - servers - incoming mail server - *log on using - Under account name, use the format: ntdomain\ntaccount\exchangeaccount And guess where myself and my coworker found this? www.swynk.com/friends/janssen/telnet_POP3_commands.asp b _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP will not send
A PHP programming forum, perhaps? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP will not send List, Can someone please point me in the right direction here? I have an IIS system (www11-sfb) that I want to send mail. When I telnet to the port it works fine and sends mail. This is done from the local machine. See logs below (Telnet from port) for details. But when I use a php script to do it from a web page the mail does not send. It initiates the initial commands but then does not establish the outbound connection. See log below (From PHP script) for details. Can anyone provide me with where to look for the issue? - John Q #Software: Microsoft Internet Information Services 5.0 #Version: 1.0 #Date: 2002-09-25 19:18:28 #Fields: date time c-ip cs-username s-sitename s-computername s-ip s-port cs-method sc-win32-status sc-bytes time-taken cs-host cs(Cookie) cs(Referer) (Telnet from port) 2002-09-25 19:18:28 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 HELO 0 50 15 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:36 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 MAIL 0 37 15 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:44 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 0 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:44 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 57 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:48 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 c 0 32 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:56 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 31 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 DATA 0 139 11469 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 - OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 55 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 EHLO 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 38 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 HELO 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 86 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 MAIL 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 39 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 RCPT 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 48 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 DATA 0 4 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 29 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 33 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 QUIT 0 4 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 22 16 - - - (From PHP script) 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 HELO 0 50 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 MAIL 0 46 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 34 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 DATA 0 139 63 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 QUIT 63 75 0 - - - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message rejected
Lyris is the list server software that powers this list. It's configured by the list owner to bounce all sorts of keywords. Send a message to the list that begins with the word Delete, for example, and see what happens. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Etts, Russell Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message rejected Hi All I know I'm opening myself up to getting flamed here, but I have to ask What is Friggin Lyris? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message rejected Friggin Lyris. I rarely tell anyone to shut their pie hole (Unless it's Andy David). Instead you shoudl ask him to document his argument in detail so you can consider it. At the moment, his assertion is too vague to consider as valid or not. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/25/2002 4:29 AM Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge Hi, We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell him to shut his pie hole? Thanks, Aaron __ __ This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. __ __ NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMTP will not send
Cthulhu Jones, While I appreciate your gifted response. The code in question is not mine. I do understand enough programming and PERL to figure out what is going on. I did resolve the issue, sort of, by using a sendmail server to relay the messages, the E2K server and IIS SMTP service would not work. Looks as if it was RFC 812 compliant, but anyway. It also worked using 5.5. Now I just have to find the difference between the communication strings of the 5.5 sendmail system versus the E2K and IIS 5.0 service. Why . . .oh why it interprets a QUIT command before it send the mail? And not it is not a relay issue. Checked that. John Q Jr. P.S. I'll let you know. - Original Message - From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:00 PM Subject: RE: SMTP will not send A PHP programming forum, perhaps? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP will not send List, Can someone please point me in the right direction here? I have an IIS system (www11-sfb) that I want to send mail. When I telnet to the port it works fine and sends mail. This is done from the local machine. See logs below (Telnet from port) for details. But when I use a php script to do it from a web page the mail does not send. It initiates the initial commands but then does not establish the outbound connection. See log below (From PHP script) for details. Can anyone provide me with where to look for the issue? - John Q #Software: Microsoft Internet Information Services 5.0 #Version: 1.0 #Date: 2002-09-25 19:18:28 #Fields: date time c-ip cs-username s-sitename s-computername s-ip s-port cs-method sc-win32-status sc-bytes time-taken cs-host cs(Cookie) cs(Referer) (Telnet from port) 2002-09-25 19:18:28 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 HELO 0 50 15 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:36 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 MAIL 0 37 15 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:44 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 0 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:44 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 57 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:48 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 c 0 32 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:56 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 31 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 DATA 0 139 11469 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 - OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 55 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 EHLO 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 38 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 HELO 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 86 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 MAIL 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 39 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 RCPT 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 48 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 DATA 0 4 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 29 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 33 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 QUIT 0 4 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 22 16 - - - (From PHP script) 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 HELO 0 50 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 MAIL 0 46 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 34 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 DATA 0 139 63 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 QUIT 63 75 0 - - - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
