RE: Mailbox Size Notification
and can we change the limit of the Mailbox size for any/all users? if so how? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange upgrade
Hi guys, Particularly to Ed. I was going to use the Ed Crowley method of migrating my users Exchange server to 2000. Basically, they are running NT4 and Exchange 5.5 sp3 enterprise edition. What i want to do is bring up another exchange server on a (good spec) laptop running windows 2000, install exchange 5.5 exactly the same, apart from the name of course. Move all the mail and PFs to the laptop and have them use that, while i upgrade the NT server to 2000. Once done, i would replicate all the mail back to the original server Is that possible, or am i way of the mark here. thnx David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange upgrade
All you have done after this process is upgrade your operating system on the server from NT4 to Windows 2000. Remember the ADC connector! You're still on Exchange 5.5 after your exercise. Any reason you don't want to do a good backup and an inline upgrade from NT4 to Windows 2000? How many users and how much mail and public folders are you talking about? Regards, Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE Sysadmin Manager Korbi.net -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 01:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange upgrade Hi guys, Particularly to Ed. I was going to use the Ed Crowley method of migrating my users Exchange server to 2000. Basically, they are running NT4 and Exchange 5.5 sp3 enterprise edition. What i want to do is bring up another exchange server on a (good spec) laptop running windows 2000, install exchange 5.5 exactly the same, apart from the name of course. Move all the mail and PFs to the laptop and have them use that, while i upgrade the NT server to 2000. Once done, i would replicate all the mail back to the original server Is that possible, or am i way of the mark here. thnx David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange upgrade
Sorry, i should have been a bit more clear about what the end result i want. I want to upgrade the operating system only to 2000. They want to retain 5.5. I do full backups every night. We may migrate to Exchange 2000 in timebut not at the moment due to costs. I only have a single PDC, and 10 clients. Stores are approx Pub.edb = 4Gb Priv.edb = 8Gb Thnx again David -- From: Sander Van Butzelaar[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 31 July 2003 12:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade All you have done after this process is upgrade your operating system on the server from NT4 to Windows 2000. Remember the ADC connector! You're still on Exchange 5.5 after your exercise. Any reason you don't want to do a good backup and an inline upgrade from NT4 to Windows 2000? How many users and how much mail and public folders are you talking about? Regards, Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE Sysadmin Manager Korbi.net -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 01:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange upgrade Hi guys, Particularly to Ed. I was going to use the Ed Crowley method of migrating my users Exchange server to 2000. Basically, they are running NT4 and Exchange 5.5 sp3 enterprise edition. What i want to do is bring up another exchange server on a (good spec) laptop running windows 2000, install exchange 5.5 exactly the same, apart from the name of course. Move all the mail and PFs to the laptop and have them use that, while i upgrade the NT server to 2000. Once done, i would replicate all the mail back to the original server Is that possible, or am i way of the mark here. thnx David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange upgrade
10 clients with a Priv of 8 GB?! Wow, I thought my 10 gb Priv with 70 users was large... John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 7:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade Sorry, i should have been a bit more clear about what the end result i want. I want to upgrade the operating system only to 2000. They want to retain 5.5. I do full backups every night. We may migrate to Exchange 2000 in timebut not at the moment due to costs. I only have a single PDC, and 10 clients. Stores are approx Pub.edb = 4Gb Priv.edb = 8Gb Thnx again David -- From: Sander Van Butzelaar[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 31 July 2003 12:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade All you have done after this process is upgrade your operating system on the server from NT4 to Windows 2000. Remember the ADC connector! You're still on Exchange 5.5 after your exercise. Any reason you don't want to do a good backup and an inline upgrade from NT4 to Windows 2000? How many users and how much mail and public folders are you talking about? Regards, Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE Sysadmin Manager Korbi.net -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 01:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange upgrade Hi guys, Particularly to Ed. I was going to use the Ed Crowley method of migrating my users Exchange server to 2000. Basically, they are running NT4 and Exchange 5.5 sp3 enterprise edition. What i want to do is bring up another exchange server on a (good spec) laptop running windows 2000, install exchange 5.5 exactly the same, apart from the name of course. Move all the mail and PFs to the laptop and have them use that, while i upgrade the NT server to 2000. Once done, i would replicate all the mail back to the original server Is that possible, or am i way of the mark here. thnx David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange upgrade
Exchange 5.5 requires a ADC connector for linking it's mailbox accounts to the user names. That's about the only link it has with Windows 2000. As long as you have the three .edb files exchange 5.5 can be re-installed in a flash (provided your security accounts are there). I wouldn't bother with the double move. Your biggest thing is to sort out the exchange environment before you go to Windows 2000. No mailbox must have the same user account etc. Microsoft brought out some tools to check your 5.5 environment to check for this type of thing. I would worry more about doing the NT4 to Windows 2000 upgrade properly then Exchange 5.5. Rather make the laptop a NT4.0 BDC so that you have a set of NT4.0 user accounts for worst case scenario. I take it you have no test environment to test and document your move on. Regards, Sander -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 02:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade Sorry, i should have been a bit more clear about what the end result i want. I want to upgrade the operating system only to 2000. They want to retain 5.5. I do full backups every night. We may migrate to Exchange 2000 in timebut not at the moment due to costs. I only have a single PDC, and 10 clients. Stores are approx Pub.edb = 4Gb Priv.edb = 8Gb Thnx again David -- From: Sander Van Butzelaar[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 31 July 2003 12:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade All you have done after this process is upgrade your operating system on the server from NT4 to Windows 2000. Remember the ADC connector! You're still on Exchange 5.5 after your exercise. Any reason you don't want to do a good backup and an inline upgrade from NT4 to Windows 2000? How many users and how much mail and public folders are you talking about? Regards, Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE Sysadmin Manager Korbi.net -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 01:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange upgrade Hi guys, Particularly to Ed. I was going to use the Ed Crowley method of migrating my users Exchange server to 2000. Basically, they are running NT4 and Exchange 5.5 sp3 enterprise edition. What i want to do is bring up another exchange server on a (good spec) laptop running windows 2000, install exchange 5.5 exactly the same, apart from the name of course. Move all the mail and PFs to the laptop and have them use that, while i upgrade the NT server to 2000. Once done, i would replicate all the mail back to the original server Is that possible, or am i way of the mark here. thnx David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
Upgrade Questions
Hello All. This weekend we will be upgrading our NT 4.0 PDC to Active Directory. Currently, my Exchange 5.5 sp4 server is running Windows 2000 Advanced Server. I am a bit confused as to what will happen to my Exchange server when the PDC upgrades? Once the PDC is upgraded, the Exchange server will be joined automatically to AD, right? What things do I need to do on the Exchange server to prepare it for this weekends PDC upgrade? I will be upgrading Exchange 5.5 to 2000 in two weeks, however I need to know what I should do for the preparation of the AD upgrade on the Exchange 5.5 server. Do I need to do nothing at all? What is this ADC (Active Directory Connector) and when is this used? During the Exchange 2000 upgrade? Thanks for any clarification, comments and answers. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OE Marking POP Messages Read
This is by design. I don't believe that there's a fix. Have you tried IMAP instead of POP? That should resolve this issue, kinda - any messages that aren't marked as read in the IMAP client should remain marked as unread. Missy - Original Message - From: Sean Winters [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 1:44 AM Subject: OE Marking POP Messages Read When users access their mailbox via POP3, any new messages that are downloaded are marked as read on the server. Needless to say this causes confusion when they go to use OL. Server: Win2K SP4 w/ current hot fixes, Exchange 2K SP3 Client: POP - duplicated in OE (several versions) as well as Eudora POP client embedded in Sprint Treo cell phones (CE device) Thanks for any assistance. Sean _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules?
I have architected for Fortune 10s... but this time I have a small server on a home network. I use DynDNS.ORG to update the A and MX records. AOL has just instituted a new policy rejecting any email server coming from a dynamic IP address. I have emailed them asking about this but I know they will respond with something like We are attempting to reduce SPAM... even though I reject SPAM on my server's SMTP connector based on IP because SPAMmers typically use the same ISPs and static IP addresses... and there are only a handful of ISPs that allow spammers knowingly. Anyone else had problems with this lately... or more importantly found a way around it (other than getting/paying for a static IP address)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Major SMTP problem, relay is blocked but still being accessed.
Are you being used as a relay or are you just being bombarded with a brute force spam attack? Brute force spam attacks usually involve a spammer sending thousands of messages to 'common' names in hope for finding real email addresses (Example: Jim, Jim1, Jim2, Jim3, JimA, JimB, JimC, Steve, Steve1, etc etc all @company.com of course). If it is a brute force spam attack, then your best bet would be to block the IP's of the spammer at your firewall so the spammer can no longer make SMTP connections to your server. Joe Pochedley Weiler's Law - Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do it himself. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Major SMTP problem, relay is blocked but still being accessed. Outbound junk from a recipient other than ? Is your guest account enabled by chance? BTW, your Mx record is invalid, it needs to be an A record, rather than an IP address. On 07/30/03 20:55, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have an SBS 2000 running Exchange SP3. In the past few days I have noticed lots of junk mails in the SMTP queue and a huge amount of BadMail. Anyway the relay was blocked to begin with, the server is virus free, all password have been changed, the IP has been changed. Right now the server is at 100% processing and loaded with spam being relayed. What am I missing? I confirmed the relay block procedure from 2 different sources so I am confident the relay is closed. It is unfirewalled, running IIS, no ISA server, 20 users on the network. Any ideas would be greatley appreciated. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules?
Use your ISP's SMTP server as a smarthost for all outgoing mail. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bubba G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? I have architected for Fortune 10s... but this time I have a small server on a home network. I use DynDNS.ORG to update the A and MX records. AOL has just instituted a new policy rejecting any email server coming from a dynamic IP address. I have emailed them asking about this but I know they will respond with something like We are attempting to reduce SPAM... even though I reject SPAM on my server's SMTP connector based on IP because SPAMmers typically use the same ISPs and static IP addresses... and there are only a handful of ISPs that allow spammers knowingly. Anyone else had problems with this lately... or more importantly found a way around it (other than getting/paying for a static IP address)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange upgrade
Why not just take a good backup (or 3) and upgrade in place? On 07/31/03 06:47, David Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, Particularly to Ed. I was going to use the Ed Crowley method of migrating my users Exchange server to 2000. Basically, they are running NT4 and Exchange 5.5 sp3 enterprise edition. What i want to do is bring up another exchange server on a (good spec) laptop running windows 2000, install exchange 5.5 exactly the same, apart from the name of course. Move all the mail and PFs to the laptop and have them use that, while i upgrade the NT server to 2000. Once done, i would replicate all the mail back to the original server Is that possible, or am i way of the mark here. thnx David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrade Questions
When just the domain is being upgraded, Exchange 5.5 doesn't know anything about W2K (it continues to work with the domain controllers at it had in the past) and AD knows nothing about the Exchange org in your environment. The ADC replicates Exchange topology and user data into AD and matches up objects and attributes with objects in AD. On 07/31/03 07:48, Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All. This weekend we will be upgrading our NT 4.0 PDC to Active Directory. Currently, my Exchange 5.5 sp4 server is running Windows 2000 Advanced Server. I am a bit confused as to what will happen to my Exchange server when the PDC upgrades? Once the PDC is upgraded, the Exchange server will be joined automatically to AD, right? What things do I need to do on the Exchange server to prepare it for this weekends PDC upgrade? I will be upgrading Exchange 5.5 to 2000 in two weeks, however I need to know what I should do for the preparation of the AD upgrade on the Exchange 5.5 server. Do I need to do nothing at all? What is this ADC (Active Directory Connector) and when is this used? During the Exchange 2000 upgrade? Thanks for any clarification, comments and answers. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=e nglish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OE Marking POP Messages Read
The fix is not to use POP3. On 07/31/03 07:50, Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is by design. I don't believe that there's a fix. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mailbox Size Notification
Yes. How depends on the Exchange version, but I believe the process is described in the help files for respective versions. On 07/31/03 03:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and can we change the limit of the Mailbox size for any/all users? if so how? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT - Beta EntourageX v10.1.4
NDAs make that somewhat difficult. On 07/30/03 10:03, Holstrom, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd be interested in hearing about it as well... -Original Message- From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Beta EntourageX v10.1.4 Anybody trying to work with this yet? Please email offlist. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Beta EntourageX v10.1.4
I just heard on August 4th there will be an announcment by Microsoft concerning the beta. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OT - Beta EntourageX v10.1.4 NDAs make that somewhat difficult. On 07/30/03 10:03, Holstrom, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd be interested in hearing about it as well... -Original Message- From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Beta EntourageX v10.1.4 Anybody trying to work with this yet? Please email offlist. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mailbox Size Notification
In 5.5, set a default in the PRIV store under storage limits for all recipients for that server, or in the recipient container under Limits. Yes. How depends on the Exchange version, but I believe the process is described in the help files for respective versions. On 07/31/03 03:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and can we change the limit of the Mailbox size for any/all users? if so how? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules?
I've had problems from a dynamic dns site on a cable modem sending to aol for a long time. ISP's smtp server is the only way to go - smarthost is one way, you can also set up an smtp connector to send mail to specific domains to your isp's smtp server such as aol.com. Your choice if you trust your isp's mail server more, or your ability to keep the list on your connector current for domains that won't except your outgoing email directly -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? Use your ISP's SMTP server as a smarthost for all outgoing mail. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bubba G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? I have architected for Fortune 10s... but this time I have a small server on a home network. I use DynDNS.ORG to update the A and MX records. AOL has just instituted a new policy rejecting any email server coming from a dynamic IP address. I have emailed them asking about this but I know they will respond with something like We are attempting to reduce SPAM... even though I reject SPAM on my server's SMTP connector based on IP because SPAMmers typically use the same ISPs and static IP addresses... and there are only a handful of ISPs that allow spammers knowingly. Anyone else had problems with this lately... or more importantly found a way around it (other than getting/paying for a static IP address)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Major SMTP problem, relay is blocked but still being accessed.
And to add, SBS is an open relay out of the box, and the Q article MS put out to fix it, does not. I would truely recomend killing the connectors, and redoing them, following the info from MS and Slipstick. I can spend more time on this with you tomorrow, if none of the other posts proves helpful.. but that's usually not the case :) Outbound junk from a recipient other than ? Is your guest account enabled by chance? BTW, your Mx record is invalid, it needs to be an A record, rather than an IP address. On 07/30/03 20:55, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have an SBS 2000 running Exchange SP3. In the past few days I have noticed lots of junk mails in the SMTP queue and a huge amount of BadMail. Anyway the relay was blocked to begin with, the server is virus free, all password have been changed, the IP has been changed. Right now the server is at 100% processing and loaded with spam being relayed. What am I missing? I confirmed the relay block procedure from 2 different sources so I am confident the relay is closed. It is unfirewalled, running IIS, no ISA server, 20 users on the network. Any ideas would be greatley appreciated. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2k IIS SMTP used as an Exchange 5.5 Relay - not working
Help! I don't see what I am missing, but I have a client attempting to use 2k's IIS's SMTP service to relay for thier Exchange 5.5 server, and I just can't get it to work. ANY insight in this would help... Thanks - Jamie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange upgrade
Hi I do have a test enviornment. I have a windows 2000 server running Exchange 5.5, with no problems at all so far, hence the reason for moving these guys of NT4, now i'm feeling confident in installing/configuring and running 5.5 in the AD enviornment. My main reason behind this was to avoid the tape restores and do it in a different way, mainly for my own experience.I have restored via tape in the past. I would like to do it while they work, and during the daytime for a change and maybe learn a little into the bargain. thnx David -- From: Sander Van Butzelaar[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 31 July 2003 13:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade Exchange 5.5 requires a ADC connector for linking it's mailbox accounts to the user names. That's about the only link it has with Windows 2000. As long as you have the three .edb files exchange 5.5 can be re-installed in a flash (provided your security accounts are there). I wouldn't bother with the double move. Your biggest thing is to sort out the exchange environment before you go to Windows 2000. No mailbox must have the same user account etc. Microsoft brought out some tools to check your 5.5 environment to check for this type of thing. I would worry more about doing the NT4 to Windows 2000 upgrade properly then Exchange 5.5. Rather make the laptop a NT4.0 BDC so that you have a set of NT4.0 user accounts for worst case scenario. I take it you have no test environment to test and document your move on. Regards, Sander -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 02:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade Sorry, i should have been a bit more clear about what the end result i want. I want to upgrade the operating system only to 2000. They want to retain 5.5. I do full backups every night. We may migrate to Exchange 2000 in timebut not at the moment due to costs. I only have a single PDC, and 10 clients. Stores are approx Pub.edb = 4Gb Priv.edb = 8Gb Thnx again David -- From: Sander Van Butzelaar[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 31 July 2003 12:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Exchange upgrade All you have done after this process is upgrade your operating system on the server from NT4 to Windows 2000. Remember the ADC connector! You're still on Exchange 5.5 after your exercise. Any reason you don't want to do a good backup and an inline upgrade from NT4 to Windows 2000? How many users and how much mail and public folders are you talking about? Regards, Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE Sysadmin Manager Korbi.net -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 01:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange upgrade Hi guys, Particularly to Ed. I was going to use the Ed Crowley method of migrating my users Exchange server to 2000. Basically, they are running NT4 and Exchange 5.5 sp3 enterprise edition. What i want to do is bring up another exchange server on a (good spec) laptop running windows 2000, install exchange 5.5 exactly the same, apart from the name of course. Move all the mail and PFs to the laptop and have them use that, while i upgrade the NT server to 2000. Once done, i would replicate all the mail back to the original server Is that possible, or am i way of the mark here. thnx David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the
RE: 2k IIS SMTP used as an Exchange 5.5 Relay - not working
ANY more information you could give us would help. What do you mean you can't get it to work? Have you checked the FAQ? Appendix H covers this topic. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxh.htm Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Jamie Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 1:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 2k IIS SMTP used as an Exchange 5.5 Relay - not working Help! I don't see what I am missing, but I have a client attempting to use 2k's IIS's SMTP service to relay for thier Exchange 5.5 server, and I just can't get it to work. ANY insight in this would help... Thanks - Jamie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade Questions
Even if the Exchange 5.5 server is on a Windows 2000 Advanced Server? I just don't want things to go haywire when the PDC upgrades. So the ADC is used if you want to use the AD features through Exchange? Kind of like the ADC (Active Directory Client) for Wind 9.x machines, right? The real question here is, I do not need to install the ADC for Exchange 5.5 this weekend? We will be upgrading Exchange next weekend and I want to be sure that I don't need anything for the guy who will be doing the upgrading this weekend. Thanks Samantha -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Upgrade Questions When just the domain is being upgraded, Exchange 5.5 doesn't know anything about W2K (it continues to work with the domain controllers at it had in the past) and AD knows nothing about the Exchange org in your environment. The ADC replicates Exchange topology and user data into AD and matches up objects and attributes with objects in AD. On 07/31/03 07:48, Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All. This weekend we will be upgrading our NT 4.0 PDC to Active Directory. Currently, my Exchange 5.5 sp4 server is running Windows 2000 Advanced Server. I am a bit confused as to what will happen to my Exchange server when the PDC upgrades? Once the PDC is upgraded, the Exchange server will be joined automatically to AD, right? What things do I need to do on the Exchange server to prepare it for this weekends PDC upgrade? I will be upgrading Exchange 5.5 to 2000 in two weeks, however I need to know what I should do for the preparation of the AD upgrade on the Exchange 5.5 server. Do I need to do nothing at all? What is this ADC (Active Directory Connector) and when is this used? During the Exchange 2000 upgrade? Thanks for any clarification, comments and answers. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =e nglish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade Questions
Don't you have to leave the NT4 domain in place for the exchange 5.5 organisation? Harriet -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 15:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Even if the Exchange 5.5 server is on a Windows 2000 Advanced Server? I just don't want things to go haywire when the PDC upgrades. So the ADC is used if you want to use the AD features through Exchange? Kind of like the ADC (Active Directory Client) for Wind 9.x machines, right? The real question here is, I do not need to install the ADC for Exchange 5.5 this weekend? We will be upgrading Exchange next weekend and I want to be sure that I don't need anything for the guy who will be doing the upgrading this weekend. Thanks Samantha -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Upgrade Questions When just the domain is being upgraded, Exchange 5.5 doesn't know anything about W2K (it continues to work with the domain controllers at it had in the past) and AD knows nothing about the Exchange org in your environment. The ADC replicates Exchange topology and user data into AD and matches up objects and attributes with objects in AD. On 07/31/03 07:48, Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All. This weekend we will be upgrading our NT 4.0 PDC to Active Directory. Currently, my Exchange 5.5 sp4 server is running Windows 2000 Advanced Server. I am a bit confused as to what will happen to my Exchange server when the PDC upgrades? Once the PDC is upgraded, the Exchange server will be joined automatically to AD, right? What things do I need to do on the Exchange server to prepare it for this weekends PDC upgrade? I will be upgrading Exchange 5.5 to 2000 in two weeks, however I need to know what I should do for the preparation of the AD upgrade on the Exchange 5.5 server. Do I need to do nothing at all? What is this ADC (Active Directory Connector) and when is this used? During the Exchange 2000 upgrade? Thanks for any clarification, comments and answers. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =e nglish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade Questions
No. Exchange 5.5 maintains it's own directory, so it does not require an NT 4.0 domain to function. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Wood, Harriet [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:22 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Upgrade Questions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Don't you have to leave the NT4 domain in place for the exchange 5.5 organisation? Harriet -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 15:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Even if the Exchange 5.5 server is on a Windows 2000 Advanced Server? I just don't want things to go haywire when the PDC upgrades. So the ADC is used if you want to use the AD features through Exchange? Kind of like the ADC (Active Directory Client) for Wind 9.x machines, right? The real question here is, I do not need to install the ADC for Exchange 5.5 this weekend? We will be upgrading Exchange next weekend and I want to be sure that I don't need anything for the guy who will be doing the upgrading this weekend. Thanks Samantha -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Upgrade Questions When just the domain is being upgraded, Exchange 5.5 doesn't know anything about W2K (it continues to work with the domain controllers at it had in the past) and AD knows nothing about the Exchange org in your environment. The ADC replicates Exchange topology and user data into AD and matches up objects and attributes with objects in AD. On 07/31/03 07:48, Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All. This weekend we will be upgrading our NT 4.0 PDC to Active Directory. Currently, my Exchange 5.5 sp4 server is running Windows 2000 Advanced Server. I am a bit confused as to what will happen to my Exchange server when the PDC upgrades? Once the PDC is upgraded, the Exchange server will be joined automatically to AD, right? What things do I need to do on the Exchange server to prepare it for this weekends PDC upgrade? I will be upgrading Exchange 5.5 to 2000 in two weeks, however I need to know what I should do for the preparation of the AD upgrade on the Exchange 5.5 server. Do I need to do nothing at all? What is this ADC (Active Directory Connector) and when is this used? During the Exchange 2000 upgrade? Thanks for any clarification, comments and answers. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =e nglish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2k IIS SMTP used as an Exchange 5.5 Relay - not working
Actually got this solved a couple hours later... would have posted it but it had not hit until much later. Sorry. ANY more information you could give us would help. What do you mean you can't get it to work? Have you checked the FAQ? Appendix H covers this topic. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxh.htm Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Jamie Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 1:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 2k IIS SMTP used as an Exchange 5.5 Relay - not working Help! I don't see what I am missing, but I have a client attempting to use 2k's IIS's SMTP service to relay for thier Exchange 5.5 server, and I just can't get it to work. ANY insight in this would help... Thanks - Jamie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade Questions
Who wants to start placing bets on when the last NT 4.0 Domain will be upgraded to Win2K AD? :) -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade Questions Hello All. This weekend we will be upgrading our NT 4.0 PDC to Active Directory. Currently, my Exchange 5.5 sp4 server is running Windows 2000 Advanced Server. I am a bit confused as to what will happen to my Exchange server when the PDC upgrades? Once the PDC is upgraded, the Exchange server will be joined automatically to AD, right? What things do I need to do on the Exchange server to prepare it for this weekends PDC upgrade? I will be upgrading Exchange 5.5 to 2000 in two weeks, however I need to know what I should do for the preparation of the AD upgrade on the Exchange 5.5 server. Do I need to do nothing at all? What is this ADC (Active Directory Connector) and when is this used? During the Exchange 2000 upgrade? Thanks for any clarification, comments and answers. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules?
This is going over my head, I'm afraid. How can the accepting host know that the sending server has a dynamic IP address? Surely it's not changing in the middle of a mail send? Is the recipient doing a reverse DNS lookup or something? Trying to learn something in Pittsburgh Jim Helfer Greg Sachs wrote: I've had problems from a dynamic dns site on a cable modem sending to aol for a long time. ISP's smtp server is the only way to go - smarthost is one way, you can also set up an smtp connector to send mail to specific domains to your isp's smtp server such as aol.com. Your choice if you trust your isp's mail server more, or your ability to keep the list on your connector current for domains that won't except your outgoing email directly -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? Use your ISP's SMTP server as a smarthost for all outgoing mail. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bubba G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? I have architected for Fortune 10s... but this time I have a small server on a home network. I use DynDNS.ORG to update the A and MX records. AOL has just instituted a new policy rejecting any email server coming from a dynamic IP address. I have emailed them asking about this but I know they will respond with something like We are attempting to reduce SPAM... even though I reject SPAM on my server's SMTP connector based on IP because SPAMmers typically use the same ISPs and static IP addresses... and there are only a handful of ISPs that allow spammers knowingly. Anyone else had problems with this lately... or more importantly found a way around it (other than getting/paying for a static IP address)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade Questions
Windows 2014, (except for those 300 servers that have been running re-compiled assembler programs from the 80's running on 'newer machines' but the coders have long been retired, outsourced, or HB1'd. Fenton -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Who wants to start placing bets on when the last NT 4.0 Domain will be upgraded to Win2K AD? :) -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade Questions Hello All. This weekend we will be upgrading our NT 4.0 PDC to Active Directory. Currently, my Exchange 5.5 sp4 server is running Windows 2000 Advanced Server. I am a bit confused as to what will happen to my Exchange server when the PDC upgrades? Once the PDC is upgraded, the Exchange server will be joined automatically to AD, right? What things do I need to do on the Exchange server to prepare it for this weekends PDC upgrade? I will be upgrading Exchange 5.5 to 2000 in two weeks, however I need to know what I should do for the preparation of the AD upgrade on the Exchange 5.5 server. Do I need to do nothing at all? What is this ADC (Active Directory Connector) and when is this used? During the Exchange 2000 upgrade? Thanks for any clarification, comments and answers. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules?
ISP's have blocks of IP addresses that are reserved for Dynamic IP's. Get an IP and a subnet mask and it's not too hard to figure out the block of addresses. I don't know the exact specifics of how AOL for instance is doing this, but it is usually fairly easy to block or reject mail coming from specific IP's, or in their case, they have the ability to reject an entire netblock. The method of inspecting it is the same as spam filters. They check the headers of the e-mail before allowing it to pass. Or they check the subject line, etc. It all works the same way. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:37 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? This is going over my head, I'm afraid. How can the accepting host know that the sending server has a dynamic IP address? Surely it's not changing in the middle of a mail send? Is the recipient doing a reverse DNS lookup or something? Trying to learn something in Pittsburgh Jim Helfer Greg Sachs wrote: I've had problems from a dynamic dns site on a cable modem sending to aol for a long time. ISP's smtp server is the only way to go - smarthost is one way, you can also set up an smtp connector to send mail to specific domains to your isp's smtp server such as aol.com. Your choice if you trust your isp's mail server more, or your ability to keep the list on your connector current for domains that won't except your outgoing email directly -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? Use your ISP's SMTP server as a smarthost for all outgoing mail. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bubba G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? I have architected for Fortune 10s... but this time I have a small server on a home network. I use DynDNS.ORG to update the A and MX records. AOL has just instituted a new policy rejecting any email server coming from a dynamic IP address. I have emailed them asking about this but I know they will respond with something like We are attempting to reduce SPAM... even though I reject SPAM on my server's SMTP connector based on IP because SPAMmers typically use the same ISPs and static IP addresses... and there are only a handful of ISPs that allow spammers knowingly. Anyone else had problems with this lately... or more importantly found a way around it (other than getting/paying for a static IP address)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode = lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode = lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Size Notification
Download ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/softlib/mslfiles/rltools.exe and use RLQUIKED to edit MDBSZ.DLL. You may need to repeat it after applying a service pack. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kent Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Size Notification In exchange 5.5, if and where can I find the message sent to user exceeding the mailbox size limit. Can it be modified Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OE Marking POP Messages Read
I was just about to write that -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OE Marking POP Messages Read The fix is not to use POP3. On 07/31/03 07:50, Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is by design. I don't believe that there's a fix. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules?
One of the RBL's (MAPS, I think) maintains a blackhole list that includes all known IP dial up pools. Kinda an interesting concept, really. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? This is going over my head, I'm afraid. How can the accepting host know that the sending server has a dynamic IP address? Surely it's not changing in the middle of a mail send? Is the recipient doing a reverse DNS lookup or something? Trying to learn something in Pittsburgh Jim Helfer Greg Sachs wrote: I've had problems from a dynamic dns site on a cable modem sending to aol for a long time. ISP's smtp server is the only way to go - smarthost is one way, you can also set up an smtp connector to send mail to specific domains to your isp's smtp server such as aol.com. Your choice if you trust your isp's mail server more, or your ability to keep the list on your connector current for domains that won't except your outgoing email directly -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? Use your ISP's SMTP server as a smarthost for all outgoing mail. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bubba G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? I have architected for Fortune 10s... but this time I have a small server on a home network. I use DynDNS.ORG to update the A and MX records. AOL has just instituted a new policy rejecting any email server coming from a dynamic IP address. I have emailed them asking about this but I know they will respond with something like We are attempting to reduce SPAM... even though I reject SPAM on my server's SMTP connector based on IP because SPAMmers typically use the same ISPs and static IP addresses... and there are only a handful of ISPs that allow spammers knowingly. Anyone else had problems with this lately... or more importantly found a way around it (other than getting/paying for a static IP address)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules?
How would AOL know that your IP address is dynamic? There's no flag in DNS or anywhere else that says your IP address is dynamic. Methinks they're looking at reverse DNS entries. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bubba G Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 6:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? I have architected for Fortune 10s... but this time I have a small server on a home network. I use DynDNS.ORG to update the A and MX records. AOL has just instituted a new policy rejecting any email server coming from a dynamic IP address. I have emailed them asking about this but I know they will respond with something like We are attempting to reduce SPAM... even though I reject SPAM on my server's SMTP connector based on IP because SPAMmers typically use the same ISPs and static IP addresses... and there are only a handful of ISPs that allow spammers knowingly. Anyone else had problems with this lately... or more importantly found a way around it (other than getting/paying for a static IP address)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules?
So they're blocking based on an RBL (or something else) but not on the fact that the IP address is dynamic. My approach would be to cajole my correspondents to switch from AOL, who seems to think it *IS* the Internet. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? One of the RBL's (MAPS, I think) maintains a blackhole list that includes all known IP dial up pools. Kinda an interesting concept, really. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? This is going over my head, I'm afraid. How can the accepting host know that the sending server has a dynamic IP address? Surely it's not changing in the middle of a mail send? Is the recipient doing a reverse DNS lookup or something? Trying to learn something in Pittsburgh Jim Helfer Greg Sachs wrote: I've had problems from a dynamic dns site on a cable modem sending to aol for a long time. ISP's smtp server is the only way to go - smarthost is one way, you can also set up an smtp connector to send mail to specific domains to your isp's smtp server such as aol.com. Your choice if you trust your isp's mail server more, or your ability to keep the list on your connector current for domains that won't except your outgoing email directly -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? Use your ISP's SMTP server as a smarthost for all outgoing mail. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bubba G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? I have architected for Fortune 10s... but this time I have a small server on a home network. I use DynDNS.ORG to update the A and MX records. AOL has just instituted a new policy rejecting any email server coming from a dynamic IP address. I have emailed them asking about this but I know they will respond with something like We are attempting to reduce SPAM... even though I reject SPAM on my server's SMTP connector based on IP because SPAMmers typically use the same ISPs and static IP addresses... and there are only a handful of ISPs that allow spammers knowingly. Anyone else had problems with this lately... or more importantly found a way around it (other than getting/paying for a static IP address)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode = lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Exchange upgrade
My method applies more to moving from one Exchange server to another. I do believe you'd be better off just upgrading the OS in place, but there's no reason my method wouldn't work to do it the way you want. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Lloyd Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 7:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade Hi I do have a test enviornment. I have a windows 2000 server running Exchange 5.5, with no problems at all so far, hence the reason for moving these guys of NT4, now i'm feeling confident in installing/configuring and running 5.5 in the AD enviornment. My main reason behind this was to avoid the tape restores and do it in a different way, mainly for my own experience.I have restored via tape in the past. I would like to do it while they work, and during the daytime for a change and maybe learn a little into the bargain. thnx David -- From: Sander Van Butzelaar[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 31 July 2003 13:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade Exchange 5.5 requires a ADC connector for linking it's mailbox accounts to the user names. That's about the only link it has with Windows 2000. As long as you have the three .edb files exchange 5.5 can be re-installed in a flash (provided your security accounts are there). I wouldn't bother with the double move. Your biggest thing is to sort out the exchange environment before you go to Windows 2000. No mailbox must have the same user account etc. Microsoft brought out some tools to check your 5.5 environment to check for this type of thing. I would worry more about doing the NT4 to Windows 2000 upgrade properly then Exchange 5.5. Rather make the laptop a NT4.0 BDC so that you have a set of NT4.0 user accounts for worst case scenario. I take it you have no test environment to test and document your move on. Regards, Sander -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 02:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade Sorry, i should have been a bit more clear about what the end result i want. I want to upgrade the operating system only to 2000. They want to retain 5.5. I do full backups every night. We may migrate to Exchange 2000 in timebut not at the moment due to costs. I only have a single PDC, and 10 clients. Stores are approx Pub.edb = 4Gb Priv.edb = 8Gb Thnx again David -- From: Sander Van Butzelaar[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 31 July 2003 12:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Exchange upgrade All you have done after this process is upgrade your operating system on the server from NT4 to Windows 2000. Remember the ADC connector! You're still on Exchange 5.5 after your exercise. Any reason you don't want to do a good backup and an inline upgrade from NT4 to Windows 2000? How many users and how much mail and public folders are you talking about? Regards, Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE Sysadmin Manager Korbi.net -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 01:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange upgrade Hi guys, Particularly to Ed. I was going to use the Ed Crowley method of migrating my users Exchange server to 2000. Basically, they are running NT4 and Exchange 5.5 sp3 enterprise edition. What i want to do is bring up another exchange server on a (good spec) laptop running windows 2000, install exchange 5.5 exactly the same, apart from the name of course. Move all the mail and PFs to the laptop and have them use that, while i upgrade the NT server to 2000. Once done, i would replicate all the mail back to the original server Is that possible, or am i way of the mark here. thnx David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode = lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: Exchange upgrade
You shouldn't have to restore from tape unless something went wrong. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Lloyd Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 7:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade Hi I do have a test enviornment. I have a windows 2000 server running Exchange 5.5, with no problems at all so far, hence the reason for moving these guys of NT4, now i'm feeling confident in installing/configuring and running 5.5 in the AD enviornment. My main reason behind this was to avoid the tape restores and do it in a different way, mainly for my own experience.I have restored via tape in the past. I would like to do it while they work, and during the daytime for a change and maybe learn a little into the bargain. thnx David -- From: Sander Van Butzelaar[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 31 July 2003 13:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade Exchange 5.5 requires a ADC connector for linking it's mailbox accounts to the user names. That's about the only link it has with Windows 2000. As long as you have the three .edb files exchange 5.5 can be re-installed in a flash (provided your security accounts are there). I wouldn't bother with the double move. Your biggest thing is to sort out the exchange environment before you go to Windows 2000. No mailbox must have the same user account etc. Microsoft brought out some tools to check your 5.5 environment to check for this type of thing. I would worry more about doing the NT4 to Windows 2000 upgrade properly then Exchange 5.5. Rather make the laptop a NT4.0 BDC so that you have a set of NT4.0 user accounts for worst case scenario. I take it you have no test environment to test and document your move on. Regards, Sander -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 02:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade Sorry, i should have been a bit more clear about what the end result i want. I want to upgrade the operating system only to 2000. They want to retain 5.5. I do full backups every night. We may migrate to Exchange 2000 in timebut not at the moment due to costs. I only have a single PDC, and 10 clients. Stores are approx Pub.edb = 4Gb Priv.edb = 8Gb Thnx again David -- From: Sander Van Butzelaar[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 31 July 2003 12:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Exchange upgrade All you have done after this process is upgrade your operating system on the server from NT4 to Windows 2000. Remember the ADC connector! You're still on Exchange 5.5 after your exercise. Any reason you don't want to do a good backup and an inline upgrade from NT4 to Windows 2000? How many users and how much mail and public folders are you talking about? Regards, Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE Sysadmin Manager Korbi.net -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 01:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange upgrade Hi guys, Particularly to Ed. I was going to use the Ed Crowley method of migrating my users Exchange server to 2000. Basically, they are running NT4 and Exchange 5.5 sp3 enterprise edition. What i want to do is bring up another exchange server on a (good spec) laptop running windows 2000, install exchange 5.5 exactly the same, apart from the name of course. Move all the mail and PFs to the laptop and have them use that, while i upgrade the NT server to 2000. Once done, i would replicate all the mail back to the original server Is that possible, or am i way of the mark here. thnx David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode = lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Upgrade Questions
Don't know the date, but it will probably be the military. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Posted At: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:30 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Upgrade Questions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Who wants to start placing bets on when the last NT 4.0 Domain will be upgraded to Win2K AD? :) -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade Questions Hello All. This weekend we will be upgrading our NT 4.0 PDC to Active Directory. Currently, my Exchange 5.5 sp4 server is running Windows 2000 Advanced Server. I am a bit confused as to what will happen to my Exchange server when the PDC upgrades? Once the PDC is upgraded, the Exchange server will be joined automatically to AD, right? What things do I need to do on the Exchange server to prepare it for this weekends PDC upgrade? I will be upgrading Exchange 5.5 to 2000 in two weeks, however I need to know what I should do for the preparation of the AD upgrade on the Exchange 5.5 server. Do I need to do nothing at all? What is this ADC (Active Directory Connector) and when is this used? During the Exchange 2000 upgrade? Thanks for any clarification, comments and answers. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Major SMTP problem, relay is blocked but still being accessed.
If you had posted your e-mail domain name we could have checked to see whether you were an open relay. But you didn't. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 6:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Major SMTP problem, relay is blocked but still being accessed. I have an SBS 2000 running Exchange SP3. In the past few days I have noticed lots of junk mails in the SMTP queue and a huge amount of BadMail. Anyway the relay was blocked to begin with, the server is virus free, all password have been changed, the IP has been changed. Right now the server is at 100% processing and loaded with spam being relayed. What am I missing? I confirmed the relay block procedure from 2 different sources so I am confident the relay is closed. It is unfirewalled, running IIS, no ISA server, 20 users on the network. Any ideas would be greatley appreciated. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules?
I like how our InfoSec guy refers to them: Alltime Online Losers -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? So they're blocking based on an RBL (or something else) but not on the fact that the IP address is dynamic. My approach would be to cajole my correspondents to switch from AOL, who seems to think it *IS* the Internet. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? One of the RBL's (MAPS, I think) maintains a blackhole list that includes all known IP dial up pools. Kinda an interesting concept, really. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? This is going over my head, I'm afraid. How can the accepting host know that the sending server has a dynamic IP address? Surely it's not changing in the middle of a mail send? Is the recipient doing a reverse DNS lookup or something? Trying to learn something in Pittsburgh Jim Helfer Greg Sachs wrote: I've had problems from a dynamic dns site on a cable modem sending to aol for a long time. ISP's smtp server is the only way to go - smarthost is one way, you can also set up an smtp connector to send mail to specific domains to your isp's smtp server such as aol.com. Your choice if you trust your isp's mail server more, or your ability to keep the list on your connector current for domains that won't except your outgoing email directly -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? Use your ISP's SMTP server as a smarthost for all outgoing mail. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bubba G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? I have architected for Fortune 10s... but this time I have a small server on a home network. I use DynDNS.ORG to update the A and MX records. AOL has just instituted a new policy rejecting any email server coming from a dynamic IP address. I have emailed them asking about this but I know they will respond with something like We are attempting to reduce SPAM... even though I reject SPAM on my server's SMTP connector based on IP because SPAMmers typically use the same ISPs and static IP addresses... and there are only a handful of ISPs that allow spammers knowingly. Anyone else had problems with this lately... or more importantly found a way around it (other than getting/paying for a static IP address)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl? enter=exchangetext_mode = lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Upgrade Questions
You've never worked for a bank, have you? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Don't know the date, but it will probably be the military. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Posted At: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:30 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Upgrade Questions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Who wants to start placing bets on when the last NT 4.0 Domain will be upgraded to Win2K AD? :) -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade Questions Hello All. This weekend we will be upgrading our NT 4.0 PDC to Active Directory. Currently, my Exchange 5.5 sp4 server is running Windows 2000 Advanced Server. I am a bit confused as to what will happen to my Exchange server when the PDC upgrades? Once the PDC is upgraded, the Exchange server will be joined automatically to AD, right? What things do I need to do on the Exchange server to prepare it for this weekends PDC upgrade? I will be upgrading Exchange 5.5 to 2000 in two weeks, however I need to know what I should do for the preparation of the AD upgrade on the Exchange 5.5 server. Do I need to do nothing at all? What is this ADC (Active Directory Connector) and when is this used? During the Exchange 2000 upgrade? Thanks for any clarification, comments and answers. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange upgrade
You also need to do this if exchange 5.5 is going to be installed on your only W2K domain controller XADM: How to Configure Exchange Server 5.5 to Run on a Domain Controller that is a Global Catalog http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;275127 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Posted At: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:10 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange upgrade Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade My method applies more to moving from one Exchange server to another. I do believe you'd be better off just upgrading the OS in place, but there's no reason my method wouldn't work to do it the way you want. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Lloyd Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 7:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade Hi I do have a test enviornment. I have a windows 2000 server running Exchange 5.5, with no problems at all so far, hence the reason for moving these guys of NT4, now i'm feeling confident in installing/configuring and running 5.5 in the AD enviornment. My main reason behind this was to avoid the tape restores and do it in a different way, mainly for my own experience.I have restored via tape in the past. I would like to do it while they work, and during the daytime for a change and maybe learn a little into the bargain. thnx David -- From: Sander Van Butzelaar[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 31 July 2003 13:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade Exchange 5.5 requires a ADC connector for linking it's mailbox accounts to the user names. That's about the only link it has with Windows 2000. As long as you have the three .edb files exchange 5.5 can be re-installed in a flash (provided your security accounts are there). I wouldn't bother with the double move. Your biggest thing is to sort out the exchange environment before you go to Windows 2000. No mailbox must have the same user account etc. Microsoft brought out some tools to check your 5.5 environment to check for this type of thing. I would worry more about doing the NT4 to Windows 2000 upgrade properly then Exchange 5.5. Rather make the laptop a NT4.0 BDC so that you have a set of NT4.0 user accounts for worst case scenario. I take it you have no test environment to test and document your move on. Regards, Sander -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 02:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade Sorry, i should have been a bit more clear about what the end result i want. I want to upgrade the operating system only to 2000. They want to retain 5.5. I do full backups every night. We may migrate to Exchange 2000 in timebut not at the moment due to costs. I only have a single PDC, and 10 clients. Stores are approx Pub.edb = 4Gb Priv.edb = 8Gb Thnx again David -- From: Sander Van Butzelaar[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 31 July 2003 12:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Exchange upgrade All you have done after this process is upgrade your operating system on the server from NT4 to Windows 2000. Remember the ADC connector! You're still on Exchange 5.5 after your exercise. Any reason you don't want to do a good backup and an inline upgrade from NT4 to Windows 2000? How many users and how much mail and public folders are you talking about? Regards, Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE Sysadmin Manager Korbi.net -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 01:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange upgrade Hi guys, Particularly to Ed. I was going to use the Ed Crowley method of migrating my users Exchange server to 2000. Basically, they are running NT4 and Exchange 5.5 sp3 enterprise edition. What i want to do is bring up another exchange server on a (good spec) laptop running windows 2000, install exchange 5.5 exactly the same, apart from the name of course. Move all the mail and PFs to the laptop and have them use that, while i upgrade the NT server to 2000. Once done, i would replicate all the mail back to the original server Is that possible, or am i way of the mark here. thnx David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in
RE: Upgrade Questions
Or local government ;-) - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 16:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions You've never worked for a bank, have you? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Don't know the date, but it will probably be the military. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Posted At: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:30 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Upgrade Questions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Who wants to start placing bets on when the last NT 4.0 Domain will be upgraded to Win2K AD? :) -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade Questions Hello All. This weekend we will be upgrading our NT 4.0 PDC to Active Directory. Currently, my Exchange 5.5 sp4 server is running Windows 2000 Advanced Server. I am a bit confused as to what will happen to my Exchange server when the PDC upgrades? Once the PDC is upgraded, the Exchange server will be joined automatically to AD, right? What things do I need to do on the Exchange server to prepare it for this weekends PDC upgrade? I will be upgrading Exchange 5.5 to 2000 in two weeks, however I need to know what I should do for the preparation of the AD upgrade on the Exchange 5.5 server. Do I need to do nothing at all? What is this ADC (Active Directory Connector) and when is this used? During the Exchange 2000 upgrade? Thanks for any clarification, comments and answers. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade Questions
Nope. But I've supported them all :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randal, Phil Posted At: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:16 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Upgrade Questions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Or local government ;-) - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 16:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions You've never worked for a bank, have you? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Don't know the date, but it will probably be the military. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Posted At: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:30 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Upgrade Questions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Who wants to start placing bets on when the last NT 4.0 Domain will be upgraded to Win2K AD? :) -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade Questions Hello All. This weekend we will be upgrading our NT 4.0 PDC to Active Directory. Currently, my Exchange 5.5 sp4 server is running Windows 2000 Advanced Server. I am a bit confused as to what will happen to my Exchange server when the PDC upgrades? Once the PDC is upgraded, the Exchange server will be joined automatically to AD, right? What things do I need to do on the Exchange server to prepare it for this weekends PDC upgrade? I will be upgrading Exchange 5.5 to 2000 in two weeks, however I need to know what I should do for the preparation of the AD upgrade on the Exchange 5.5 server. Do I need to do nothing at all? What is this ADC (Active Directory Connector) and when is this used? During the Exchange 2000 upgrade? Thanks for any clarification, comments and answers. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade Questions
Feel sorry for my last employers, who were local government. They're still running Lotus Notes. Names witheld to protect the guilty. Neil -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 31 July 2003 16:16 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Upgrade Questions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Or local government ;-) - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 16:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions You've never worked for a bank, have you? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Don't know the date, but it will probably be the military. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Posted At: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:30 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Upgrade Questions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Who wants to start placing bets on when the last NT 4.0 Domain will be upgraded to Win2K AD? :) -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade Questions Hello All. This weekend we will be upgrading our NT 4.0 PDC to Active Directory. Currently, my Exchange 5.5 sp4 server is running Windows 2000 Advanced Server. I am a bit confused as to what will happen to my Exchange server when the PDC upgrades? Once the PDC is upgraded, the Exchange server will be joined automatically to AD, right? What things do I need to do on the Exchange server to prepare it for this weekends PDC upgrade? I will be upgrading Exchange 5.5 to 2000 in two weeks, however I need to know what I should do for the preparation of the AD upgrade on the Exchange 5.5 server. Do I need to do nothing at all? What is this ADC (Active Directory Connector) and when is this used? During the Exchange 2000 upgrade? Thanks for any clarification, comments and answers. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules?
MAPS is one but there are actually several. I ran into an issue with some of our consultant using there Verizon DSL accounts being block for this very reason (they appear as a dialup pool) while I was testing Antigen Spam filter. The link below shows a number of the different RBL lists and descriptions of what they block. http://www.email-policy.com/Spam-black-lists.htm -Dave Vantine -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? One of the RBL's (MAPS, I think) maintains a blackhole list that includes all known IP dial up pools. Kinda an interesting concept, really. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? This is going over my head, I'm afraid. How can the accepting host know that the sending server has a dynamic IP address? Surely it's not changing in the middle of a mail send? Is the recipient doing a reverse DNS lookup or something? Trying to learn something in Pittsburgh Jim Helfer Greg Sachs wrote: I've had problems from a dynamic dns site on a cable modem sending to aol for a long time. ISP's smtp server is the only way to go - smarthost is one way, you can also set up an smtp connector to send mail to specific domains to your isp's smtp server such as aol.com. Your choice if you trust your isp's mail server more, or your ability to keep the list on your connector current for domains that won't except your outgoing email directly -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? Use your ISP's SMTP server as a smarthost for all outgoing mail. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bubba G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? I have architected for Fortune 10s... but this time I have a small server on a home network. I use DynDNS.ORG to update the A and MX records. AOL has just instituted a new policy rejecting any email server coming from a dynamic IP address. I have emailed them asking about this but I know they will respond with something like We are attempting to reduce SPAM... even though I reject SPAM on my server's SMTP connector based on IP because SPAMmers typically use the same ISPs and static IP addresses... and there are only a handful of ISPs that allow spammers knowingly. Anyone else had problems with this lately... or more importantly found a way around it (other than getting/paying for a static IP address)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode = lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
FROM THE DESK OF THE CHAIRMAN: SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR BUDGET AND PLANNING OF THE FEDERAL MINISTRY OF WORKS AND HOUSING(FMWH). DEAR PARTNER, STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL WE ARE MEMBERS OF A SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR BUDGET AND PLANNING OF THE FEDERAL MINISTRY OF WORKS AND HOUSING(FMWH). THIS COMMITTEE IS PRINCIPALLY CONCERNED WITH CONTRACT AWARDS AND APPROVAL. WITH OUR POSITIONS, WE HAVE SUCCESSFULLY SECURED FOR OURSELVES THE SUM OF THIRTY ONE MILLION, FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND UNITED STATES DOLLARS (US$31.5M). THIS AMOUNT WAS CAREFULLY MANIPULATED BY OVER-INVOICING OF AN OLD CONTRACT. BASED ON INFORMATION GATHERED ABOUT YOU, WE BELIEVE YOU WOULD BE IN A POSITION TO HELP US IN TRANSFERING THIS FUND (US$31.5M) INTO A SAFE ACCOUNT. IT HAS BEEN AGREED THAT THE OWNER OF THE ACCOUNT WILL BE COMPENSATED WITH 30% OF THE REMITTED FUNDS, WHILE WE KEEP 60% AS THE INITIATORS AND 10% WILL BE SET ASIDE TO OFFSET EXPENSES AND PAY THE NECESSARY TAXES. WE INTEND TO USE PART OF OUR OWN SHARE TO IMPORT FROM YOUR COUNTRY AGRICULTURALAND CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY. THIS IS BECAUSE THE PRESENT GOVERNMENT OF MYCOUNTRY IS EMPHASISING ON PROVIDING FOOD AND HOUSING FOR ALL ITS CITIZENSBEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION. HENCE,AGRICULTURAL AND CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ARE IN HIGH DEMAND OVER HERE. WE SHALL ALSO NEED YOUR ASSISTANCE IN THIS REGARD ON A COMMISSION TO BE AGREED UPON WHEN WE FINALLY MEET. ALL MODALITIES OF THIS TRANSACTION HAVE BEEN CAREFULLY WORKED OUT AND ONCE STARTED WILL NOT TAKE MORE THAN SEVEN (7) WORKING DAYS, WITH YOUR FULL SUPPORT. THISTRANSACTION IS 100% RISK FREE. IF THIS PROPOSAL SATISFIES YOU,PLEASE REACH US ONLY BY EMAIL FOR MORE INFORMATION. PLEASE, TREAT AS URGENT AND VERY IMPORTANT. YOURS FAITHFULLY, DR.JOHN MARK. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
Oh my :) Please, I want to help! Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life! http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 -Original Message- From: John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 1980 1:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL FROM THE DESK OF THE CHAIRMAN: SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR BUDGET AND PLANNING OF THE FEDERAL MINISTRY OF WORKS AND HOUSING(FMWH). DEAR PARTNER, STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL WE ARE MEMBERS OF A SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR BUDGET AND PLANNING OF THE FEDERAL MINISTRY OF WORKS AND HOUSING(FMWH). THIS COMMITTEE IS PRINCIPALLY CONCERNED WITH CONTRACT AWARDS AND APPROVAL. WITH OUR POSITIONS, WE HAVE SUCCESSFULLY SECURED FOR OURSELVES THE SUM OF THIRTY ONE MILLION, FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND UNITED STATES DOLLARS (US$31.5M). THIS AMOUNT WAS CAREFULLY MANIPULATED BY OVER-INVOICING OF AN OLD CONTRACT. BASED ON INFORMATION GATHERED ABOUT YOU, WE BELIEVE YOU WOULD BE IN A POSITION TO HELP US IN TRANSFERING THIS FUND (US$31.5M) INTO A SAFE ACCOUNT. IT HAS BEEN AGREED THAT THE OWNER OF THE ACCOUNT WILL BE COMPENSATED WITH 30% OF THE REMITTED FUNDS, WHILE WE KEEP 60% AS THE INITIATORS AND 10% WILL BE SET ASIDE TO OFFSET EXPENSES AND PAY THE NECESSARY TAXES. WE INTEND TO USE PART OF OUR OWN SHARE TO IMPORT FROM YOUR COUNTRY AGRICULTURALAND CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY. THIS IS BECAUSE THE PRESENT GOVERNMENT OF MYCOUNTRY IS EMPHASISING ON PROVIDING FOOD AND HOUSING FOR ALL ITS CITIZENSBEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION. HENCE,AGRICULTURAL AND CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ARE IN HIGH DEMAND OVER HERE. WE SHALL ALSO NEED YOUR ASSISTANCE IN THIS REGARD ON A COMMISSION TO BE AGREED UPON WHEN WE FINALLY MEET. ALL MODALITIES OF THIS TRANSACTION HAVE BEEN CAREFULLY WORKED OUT AND ONCE STARTED WILL NOT TAKE MORE THAN SEVEN (7) WORKING DAYS, WITH YOUR FULL SUPPORT. THISTRANSACTION IS 100% RISK FREE. IF THIS PROPOSAL SATISFIES YOU,PLEASE REACH US ONLY BY EMAIL FOR MORE INFORMATION. PLEASE, TREAT AS URGENT AND VERY IMPORTANT. YOURS FAITHFULLY, DR.JOHN MARK. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
I fancy trying this over-invoicing of old contracts technique; a few carefully-maniuplated funds wouldn't go amiss. :-) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 31 July 2003 16:46 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL Subject: RE: STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL Oh my :) Please, I want to help! Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life! http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 -Original Message- From: John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 1980 1:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL FROM THE DESK OF THE CHAIRMAN: SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR BUDGET AND PLANNING OF THE FEDERAL MINISTRY OF WORKS AND HOUSING(FMWH). DEAR PARTNER, STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL WE ARE MEMBERS OF A SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR BUDGET AND PLANNING OF THE FEDERAL MINISTRY OF WORKS AND HOUSING(FMWH). THIS COMMITTEE IS PRINCIPALLY CONCERNED WITH CONTRACT AWARDS AND APPROVAL. WITH OUR POSITIONS, WE HAVE SUCCESSFULLY SECURED FOR OURSELVES THE SUM OF THIRTY ONE MILLION, FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND UNITED STATES DOLLARS (US$31.5M). THIS AMOUNT WAS CAREFULLY MANIPULATED BY OVER-INVOICING OF AN OLD CONTRACT. BASED ON INFORMATION GATHERED ABOUT YOU, WE BELIEVE YOU WOULD BE IN A POSITION TO HELP US IN TRANSFERING THIS FUND (US$31.5M) INTO A SAFE ACCOUNT. IT HAS BEEN AGREED THAT THE OWNER OF THE ACCOUNT WILL BE COMPENSATED WITH 30% OF THE REMITTED FUNDS, WHILE WE KEEP 60% AS THE INITIATORS AND 10% WILL BE SET ASIDE TO OFFSET EXPENSES AND PAY THE NECESSARY TAXES. WE INTEND TO USE PART OF OUR OWN SHARE TO IMPORT FROM YOUR COUNTRY AGRICULTURALAND CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY. THIS IS BECAUSE THE PRESENT GOVERNMENT OF MYCOUNTRY IS EMPHASISING ON PROVIDING FOOD AND HOUSING FOR ALL ITS CITIZENSBEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION. HENCE,AGRICULTURAL AND CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ARE IN HIGH DEMAND OVER HERE. WE SHALL ALSO NEED YOUR ASSISTANCE IN THIS REGARD ON A COMMISSION TO BE AGREED UPON WHEN WE FINALLY MEET. ALL MODALITIES OF THIS TRANSACTION HAVE BEEN CAREFULLY WORKED OUT AND ONCE STARTED WILL NOT TAKE MORE THAN SEVEN (7) WORKING DAYS, WITH YOUR FULL SUPPORT. THISTRANSACTION IS 100% RISK FREE. IF THIS PROPOSAL SATISFIES YOU,PLEASE REACH US ONLY BY EMAIL FOR MORE INFORMATION. PLEASE, TREAT AS URGENT AND VERY IMPORTANT. YOURS FAITHFULLY, DR.JOHN MARK. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade Questions
I wonder how many organisations are still running NT 3.51 or MS Mail? Paul -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 16:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Feel sorry for my last employers, who were local government. They're still running Lotus Notes. Names witheld to protect the guilty. Neil -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 31 July 2003 16:16 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Upgrade Questions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Or local government ;-) - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 16:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions You've never worked for a bank, have you? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Don't know the date, but it will probably be the military. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Posted At: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:30 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Upgrade Questions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Who wants to start placing bets on when the last NT 4.0 Domain will be upgraded to Win2K AD? :) -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade Questions Hello All. This weekend we will be upgrading our NT 4.0 PDC to Active Directory. Currently, my Exchange 5.5 sp4 server is running Windows 2000 Advanced Server. I am a bit confused as to what will happen to my Exchange server when the PDC upgrades? Once the PDC is upgraded, the Exchange server will be joined automatically to AD, right? What things do I need to do on the Exchange server to prepare it for this weekends PDC upgrade? I will be upgrading Exchange 5.5 to 2000 in two weeks, however I need to know what I should do for the preparation of the AD upgrade on the Exchange 5.5 server. Do I need to do nothing at all? What is this ADC (Active Directory Connector) and when is this used? During the Exchange 2000 upgrade? Thanks for any clarification, comments and answers. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ:
RE: STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
Dude, I'm LMAO with this post. The first thing I thought was who is going to have the funniest response to this one...hahahahahahahhaa! _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL I fancy trying this over-invoicing of old contracts technique; a few carefully-maniuplated funds wouldn't go amiss. :-) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 31 July 2003 16:46 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL Subject: RE: STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL Oh my :) Please, I want to help! Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life! http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 -Original Message- From: John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 1980 1:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL FROM THE DESK OF THE CHAIRMAN: SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR BUDGET AND PLANNING OF THE FEDERAL MINISTRY OF WORKS AND HOUSING(FMWH). DEAR PARTNER, STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL WE ARE MEMBERS OF A SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR BUDGET AND PLANNING OF THE FEDERAL MINISTRY OF WORKS AND HOUSING(FMWH). THIS COMMITTEE IS PRINCIPALLY CONCERNED WITH CONTRACT AWARDS AND APPROVAL. WITH OUR POSITIONS, WE HAVE SUCCESSFULLY SECURED FOR OURSELVES THE SUM OF THIRTY ONE MILLION, FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND UNITED STATES DOLLARS (US$31.5M). THIS AMOUNT WAS CAREFULLY MANIPULATED BY OVER-INVOICING OF AN OLD CONTRACT. BASED ON INFORMATION GATHERED ABOUT YOU, WE BELIEVE YOU WOULD BE IN A POSITION TO HELP US IN TRANSFERING THIS FUND (US$31.5M) INTO A SAFE ACCOUNT. IT HAS BEEN AGREED THAT THE OWNER OF THE ACCOUNT WILL BE COMPENSATED WITH 30% OF THE REMITTED FUNDS, WHILE WE KEEP 60% AS THE INITIATORS AND 10% WILL BE SET ASIDE TO OFFSET EXPENSES AND PAY THE NECESSARY TAXES. WE INTEND TO USE PART OF OUR OWN SHARE TO IMPORT FROM YOUR COUNTRY AGRICULTURALAND CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY. THIS IS BECAUSE THE PRESENT GOVERNMENT OF MYCOUNTRY IS EMPHASISING ON PROVIDING FOOD AND HOUSING FOR ALL ITS CITIZENSBEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION. HENCE,AGRICULTURAL AND CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ARE IN HIGH DEMAND OVER HERE. WE SHALL ALSO NEED YOUR ASSISTANCE IN THIS REGARD ON A COMMISSION TO BE AGREED UPON WHEN WE FINALLY MEET. ALL MODALITIES OF THIS TRANSACTION HAVE BEEN CAREFULLY WORKED OUT AND ONCE STARTED WILL NOT TAKE MORE THAN SEVEN (7) WORKING DAYS, WITH YOUR FULL SUPPORT. THISTRANSACTION IS 100% RISK FREE. IF THIS PROPOSAL SATISFIES YOU,PLEASE REACH US ONLY BY EMAIL FOR MORE INFORMATION. PLEASE, TREAT AS URGENT AND VERY IMPORTANT. YOURS FAITHFULLY, DR.JOHN MARK. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade Questions
We had a customer request MSMail support late last year. We all ran for cover. Neil -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 31 July 2003 16:50 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Upgrade Questions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions I wonder how many organisations are still running NT 3.51 or MS Mail? Paul -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 16:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Feel sorry for my last employers, who were local government. They're still running Lotus Notes. Names witheld to protect the guilty. Neil -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 31 July 2003 16:16 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Upgrade Questions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Or local government ;-) - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 16:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions You've never worked for a bank, have you? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Don't know the date, but it will probably be the military. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Posted At: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:30 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Upgrade Questions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Who wants to start placing bets on when the last NT 4.0 Domain will be upgraded to Win2K AD? :) -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade Questions Hello All. This weekend we will be upgrading our NT 4.0 PDC to Active Directory. Currently, my Exchange 5.5 sp4 server is running Windows 2000 Advanced Server. I am a bit confused as to what will happen to my Exchange server when the PDC upgrades? Once the PDC is upgraded, the Exchange server will be joined automatically to AD, right? What things do I need to do on the Exchange server to prepare it for this weekends PDC upgrade? I will be upgrading Exchange 5.5 to 2000 in two weeks, however I need to know what I should do for the preparation of the AD upgrade on the Exchange 5.5 server. Do I need to do nothing at all? What is this ADC (Active Directory Connector) and when is this used? During the Exchange 2000 upgrade? Thanks for any clarification, comments and answers. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this
RE: Upgrade Questions
Meh. Whatever does the job. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 16:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions We had a customer request MSMail support late last year. We all ran for cover. Neil The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade Questions
How true. It's funny that, when faced with MSMail, a lot of the knowledge does creep back into the brain eventually! :-) -Original Message- From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 31 July 2003 16:56 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Upgrade Questions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Meh. Whatever does the job. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 16:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions We had a customer request MSMail support late last year. We all ran for cover. Neil The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade Questions
Like the M: drive ;-) Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 17:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions How true. It's funny that, when faced with MSMail, a lot of the knowledge does creep back into the brain eventually! :-) -Original Message- From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 31 July 2003 16:56 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Upgrade Questions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions Meh. Whatever does the job. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 16:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions We had a customer request MSMail support late last year. We all ran for cover. Neil The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OE Marking POP Messages Read
I know this is expected behavior for POP. On our current Exchange 5.5 server, messages are NOT marked as read after they are POPped. Why could this be? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OE Marking POP Messages Read I was just about to write that -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OE Marking POP Messages Read The fix is not to use POP3. On 07/31/03 07:50, Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is by design. I don't believe that there's a fix. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OE Marking POP Messages Read
Because they are marked as read on the client, not the server. -Original Message- From: Sean Winters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OE Marking POP Messages Read I know this is expected behavior for POP. On our current Exchange 5.5 server, messages are NOT marked as read after they are POPped. Why could this be? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OE Marking POP Messages Read I was just about to write that -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OE Marking POP Messages Read The fix is not to use POP3. On 07/31/03 07:50, Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is by design. I don't believe that there's a fix. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Export of Global Address List E2K
I am trying to export a list of all my users that have an active mailbox that is visable with the GAL. Is there a tool or resource that could assist. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Export of Global Address List E2K
I believe LDIFDE can do that. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Dietz Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Export of Global Address List E2K I am trying to export a list of all my users that have an active mailbox that is visable with the GAL. Is there a tool or resource that could assist. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Export of Global Address List E2K
You may also want to check out Imanami's Directory Transformation Manager (DTM). www.imanami.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Export of Global Address List E2K I believe LDIFDE can do that. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Dietz Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Export of Global Address List E2K I am trying to export a list of all my users that have an active mailbox that is visable with the GAL. Is there a tool or resource that could assist. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Export of Global Address List E2K
You can copy the LDAP query that is used to generate the global address list (assuming you are talking about the default) it is: ( (mailnickname=*) (| ((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(!(homeMDB=*))(!(msExchHomeServerName=*)))((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(|(homeMDB=*)(msExchHomeServerName=*)))((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=contact))(objectCategory=group)(objectCategory=publicFolder) )) Just use this query with a command line LDAP tool like LDIFDE. It would go something like this: ldifde.exe -s yourADservername -d dc=yourdomain,dc=com -r ( (mailnickname=*) (| ((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(!(homeMDB=*))(!(msExchHomeServerName=*)))((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(|(homeMDB=*)(msExchHomeServerName=*)))((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=contact))(objectCategory=group)(objectCategory=publicFolder) )) -f output.ldf -l displayname This would query your AD server for all entries that would be in the GAL and dump the returned objects DN and their displayname. Enjoy, Steve I am trying to export a list of all my users that have an active mailbox that is visable with the GAL. Is there a tool or resource that could assist. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Error Message during Exchange In-place Upgrade
Hi All. I have a test Exchange environment that I am testing an in-place upgrade on. On the Components Selection page, I click on Upgrade (only option available) and I get the following error message: Multiple components cannot be assigned the requested action(s) because: - Setup is unable to access the Windows 2000 Active Directory - Failed to contact the Schema Master server for this Active Directory forest. The component Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services cannot be assigned the action Upgrade because: - Setup has determined the display name of the Organization or one of the Exchange Sites in your organization is greater than 64 characters or contains at least on of the following invalid characters: [EMAIL PROTECTED]*()_+=;:./? (including a leading /trailing space). To correct this, you must use the Exchange 5.x Administration tool to change the display name of either the organization and/or the affected Sites and then re-run setup. The name of my Exchange 5.5 Organization is MacombISD.org. I inherited this server already built with the MacombISD.org Organization name. I believe it is because of the . in the Org name. Just wondering if anyone has run into this and how complicated is it to fix? Anyone ever seen this? Any tips. Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Error Message during Exchange In-place Upgrade
Simply change the org display name and see if that resolves the issue. - Original Message - From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 1:22 PM Subject: Error Message during Exchange In-place Upgrade Hi All. I have a test Exchange environment that I am testing an in-place upgrade on. On the Components Selection page, I click on Upgrade (only option available) and I get the following error message: Multiple components cannot be assigned the requested action(s) because: - Setup is unable to access the Windows 2000 Active Directory - Failed to contact the Schema Master server for this Active Directory forest. The component Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services cannot be assigned the action Upgrade because: - Setup has determined the display name of the Organization or one of the Exchange Sites in your organization is greater than 64 characters or contains at least on of the following invalid characters: [EMAIL PROTECTED]*()_+=;:./? (including a leading /trailing space). To correct this, you must use the Exchange 5.x Administration tool to change the display name of either the organization and/or the affected Sites and then re-run setup. The name of my Exchange 5.5 Organization is MacombISD.org. I inherited this server already built with the MacombISD.org Organization name. I believe it is because of the . in the Org name. Just wondering if anyone has run into this and how complicated is it to fix? Anyone ever seen this? Any tips. Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error Message during Exchange In-place Upgrade
Change the Exchange 5.5 organization display name to something without an invalid character. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bridges, Samantha Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error Message during Exchange In-place Upgrade Hi All. I have a test Exchange environment that I am testing an in-place upgrade on. On the Components Selection page, I click on Upgrade (only option available) and I get the following error message: Multiple components cannot be assigned the requested action(s) because: - Setup is unable to access the Windows 2000 Active Directory - Failed to contact the Schema Master server for this Active Directory forest. The component Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services cannot be assigned the action Upgrade because: - Setup has determined the display name of the Organization or one of the Exchange Sites in your organization is greater than 64 characters or contains at least on of the following invalid characters: [EMAIL PROTECTED]*()_+=;:./? (including a leading /trailing space). To correct this, you must use the Exchange 5.x Administration tool to change the display name of either the organization and/or the affected Sites and then re-run setup. The name of my Exchange 5.5 Organization is MacombISD.org. I inherited this server already built with the MacombISD.org Organization name. I believe it is because of the . in the Org name. Just wondering if anyone has run into this and how complicated is it to fix? Anyone ever seen this? Any tips. Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error Message during Exchange In-place Upgrade
That worked...sorta. Now when I get to that point I get: Multiple components cannot be assigned the requested action(s) because: - Setup is unable to access the Windows 2000 Active Directory - Failed to contact the Schema Master server for this Active Directory forest. The second part of the message did not show this time. That is good but still getting the above. Thanks for all the helpyou are so helpful! Sam -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error Message during Exchange In-place Upgrade Change the Exchange 5.5 organization display name to something without an invalid character. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bridges, Samantha Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error Message during Exchange In-place Upgrade Hi All. I have a test Exchange environment that I am testing an in-place upgrade on. On the Components Selection page, I click on Upgrade (only option available) and I get the following error message: Multiple components cannot be assigned the requested action(s) because: - Setup is unable to access the Windows 2000 Active Directory - Failed to contact the Schema Master server for this Active Directory forest. The component Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services cannot be assigned the action Upgrade because: - Setup has determined the display name of the Organization or one of the Exchange Sites in your organization is greater than 64 characters or contains at least on of the following invalid characters: [EMAIL PROTECTED]*()_+=;:./? (including a leading /trailing space). To correct this, you must use the Exchange 5.x Administration tool to change the display name of either the organization and/or the affected Sites and then re-run setup. The name of my Exchange 5.5 Organization is MacombISD.org. I inherited this server already built with the MacombISD.org Organization name. I believe it is because of the . in the Org name. Just wondering if anyone has run into this and how complicated is it to fix? Anyone ever seen this? Any tips. Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas BE Settings (Was: Auto Accept Utility stopped working )
Andy / Ed / Ben, Thanks for the input and helping me figure that out. ~Jim -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Veritas BE Settings (Was: Auto Accept Utility stopped working ) You want to do an online backup of that.Thats not the Exch file path directory but rather the directory database. - Original Message - From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:27 PM Subject: RE: Veritas BE Settings (Was: Auto Accept Utility stopped working ) Andy, But I was right on this point, correct? Under the Selections tab of the BU job properties... 2. The MS Exchange Directory (should uncheck this option) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Veritas BE Settings (Was: Auto Accept Utility stopped working) From the main Backup Exec console, under the Tools / Options / Set Application Defaults property page / Exchange tab, the same backup method is selected. However, under the Restore section, we have 1) No loss restore, 2) Restore public folder and 3) Restore Private Mailboxes options all checked. Is this correct? No need to check 2 or 3 unless you want to individually restore the pub or priv.edb. You cant back them up separately, but you can restore them separately - Original Message - From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:44 PM Subject: Veritas BE Settings (Was: Auto Accept Utility stopped working) Running Veritas Version 8.60, Rev 3808 against Exchange 5.5 SP4/Win2k SP2. Due to the loss of people within the company, I am having to start learning some of the BU stuff. Before, I have just let our BU guy configure it all. I THINK I know what the settings should be, based on what I have read on Veritas and on this list, but I'm going to list what I know and let you folks confirm or deny my knowledge. In the properties of the backup job, our BU Admin has the Database and Logs (Flush committed logs) option selected as the Backup Method (that'sgood). We also have it set to NEVER use the Open File Option (that's good too). Under the Selections tab of the BU job properties, under the Exchange server, the tracking.log option is grayed out. So he has selected: 1. The c$\exchsrvr\tracking.log directory 2. The MS Exchange Directory (should uncheck this option) 3. The MS Exchange Info Store These three items would appear to correlate to the three rules below in the Selection rules of the BU job for the mailbox servers, correct? \\servername\c$\exchsrvr\tracking.log\*.* /SUBDIR \\servername\Microsoft Exchange Directory\*.* /SUBDIR \\ERCEX06\Microsoft Exchange Information Store\*.* /SUBDIR From the main Backup Exec console, under the Tools / Options / Set Application Defaults property page / Exchange tab, the same backup method is selected. However, under the Restore section, we have 1) No loss restore, 2) Restore public folder and 3) Restore Private Mailboxes options all checked. Is this correct? TIA, Jim -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working The Exchange Agent backs up the Information Store. You should be backing that up. It's a separate object. And you should be excluding the C:\Exchsrvr\*data (note wildcard) directories from your file backup. If you're running Exchange 200x, you should also exclude the mailroot directory and the M: drive from the file-based backup. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul kondilys Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working Well, actually we are running veritas with the exchange agent, only thing is that the PRIV.EDB file is skipped. I thought that in order to backup the PRIV.EDB file you have to stop the exchange services? Any ideas? Paul -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working Oh, the backup won't cause any problems. Not that it would be of any use... Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Re: Error Message during Exchange In-place Upgrade
Check DNS settings and permissions. - Original Message - From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 1:42 PM Subject: RE: Error Message during Exchange In-place Upgrade That worked...sorta. Now when I get to that point I get: Multiple components cannot be assigned the requested action(s) because: - Setup is unable to access the Windows 2000 Active Directory - Failed to contact the Schema Master server for this Active Directory forest. The second part of the message did not show this time. That is good but still getting the above. Thanks for all the helpyou are so helpful! Sam -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error Message during Exchange In-place Upgrade Change the Exchange 5.5 organization display name to something without an invalid character. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bridges, Samantha Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error Message during Exchange In-place Upgrade Hi All. I have a test Exchange environment that I am testing an in-place upgrade on. On the Components Selection page, I click on Upgrade (only option available) and I get the following error message: Multiple components cannot be assigned the requested action(s) because: - Setup is unable to access the Windows 2000 Active Directory - Failed to contact the Schema Master server for this Active Directory forest. The component Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services cannot be assigned the action Upgrade because: - Setup has determined the display name of the Organization or one of the Exchange Sites in your organization is greater than 64 characters or contains at least on of the following invalid characters: [EMAIL PROTECTED]*()_+=;:./? (including a leading /trailing space). To correct this, you must use the Exchange 5.x Administration tool to change the display name of either the organization and/or the affected Sites and then re-run setup. The name of my Exchange 5.5 Organization is MacombISD.org. I inherited this server already built with the MacombISD.org Organization name. I believe it is because of the . in the Org name. Just wondering if anyone has run into this and how complicated is it to fix? Anyone ever seen this? Any tips. Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LDAP Query
In an all 2000 server (native mode) environment is it possible to query AD via LDAP? I know in Exchange you just use the Global address list, I however still have POP/SMTP clients that we would like to set up a Directory Service to allow them to search AD. I tried to add one of my Global Catalog servers as an LDAP server on an Outlook client but the server doesn't respond to the port 389 LDAP request. Has anyone ever seen this done? I thought AD used LDAP? Thanks, Chad Wasinger Systems Administrator Alta Colleges _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
multiple OWA servers
I was looking a bit and didn't see anything on this but was curious. If you have mutiple OWA front-end servers (E2K) and when you publish the url for users to access their email via the web client. How Exchange handles which user get which server. Do they all hit the default OWA server and it just knows which OWA server handles that user mailbox? I never saw this explained very well. Has anybody seen a write-up on this and could forward a link for this. Also an install guide for this type of config. _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LDAP Query
But of course! Point the LDAP client to a GC, port 3268, with search base dc=aglets,dc=shoestring,dc=com (if your domain is aglets.shoestring.com). Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: LDAP Query In an all 2000 server (native mode) environment is it possible to query AD via LDAP? I know in Exchange you just use the Global address list, I however still have POP/SMTP clients that we would like to set up a Directory Service to allow them to search AD. I tried to add one of my Global Catalog servers as an LDAP server on an Outlook client but the server doesn't respond to the port 389 LDAP request. Has anyone ever seen this done? I thought AD used LDAP? Thanks, Chad Wasinger Systems Administrator Alta Colleges _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: multiple OWA servers
You can depend on round-robin DNS to do this, or implement Windows Network Load Balancing or, preferably, a hardware load balancing device to take care of this for you. Round-robin DNS will effectively balance load but doesn't tolerate failures, i.e., if one of two front-end servers fail, about one in two requests will fail. Load balancing is fault tolerant. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: multiple OWA servers I was looking a bit and didn't see anything on this but was curious. If you have mutiple OWA front-end servers (E2K) and when you publish the url for users to access their email via the web client. How Exchange handles which user get which server. Do they all hit the default OWA server and it just knows which OWA server handles that user mailbox? I never saw this explained very well. Has anybody seen a write-up on this and could forward a link for this. Also an install guide for this type of config. _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: multiple OWA servers
More: In Exchange 2000, a front-end server holds the session and directs the requests to the appropriate back-end server. A non-front-end server will redirect the HTTP request to the appropriate server; you will see the URL change in your browser. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: multiple OWA servers I was looking a bit and didn't see anything on this but was curious. If you have mutiple OWA front-end servers (E2K) and when you publish the url for users to access their email via the web client. How Exchange handles which user get which server. Do they all hit the default OWA server and it just knows which OWA server handles that user mailbox? I never saw this explained very well. Has anybody seen a write-up on this and could forward a link for this. Also an install guide for this type of config. _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: multiple OWA servers
That is what I was trying to remember. I was thinking of that but wasn't sure. Now it should be easy to find info on. From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: multiple OWA servers Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:50:58 -0700 You can depend on round-robin DNS to do this, or implement Windows Network Load Balancing or, preferably, a hardware load balancing device to take care of this for you. Round-robin DNS will effectively balance load but doesn't tolerate failures, i.e., if one of two front-end servers fail, about one in two requests will fail. Load balancing is fault tolerant. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: multiple OWA servers I was looking a bit and didn't see anything on this but was curious. If you have mutiple OWA front-end servers (E2K) and when you publish the url for users to access their email via the web client. How Exchange handles which user get which server. Do they all hit the default OWA server and it just knows which OWA server handles that user mailbox? I never saw this explained very well. Has anybody seen a write-up on this and could forward a link for this. Also an install guide for this type of config. _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exchange 2000
Can't seem to get Out of office auto:reply to work, have outlook 2000, exchange 2000, service pack 3- sends inside but not out to internet, I have all the settings for relaying / out of office to internet, but no luck.. anyone have any ideas?? Dan __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: multiple OWA servers
New the first part but never noticed that in a non-front end setup. You the man. From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: multiple OWA servers Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:52:12 -0700 More: In Exchange 2000, a front-end server holds the session and directs the requests to the appropriate back-end server. A non-front-end server will redirect the HTTP request to the appropriate server; you will see the URL change in your browser. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: multiple OWA servers I was looking a bit and didn't see anything on this but was curious. If you have mutiple OWA front-end servers (E2K) and when you publish the url for users to access their email via the web client. How Exchange handles which user get which server. Do they all hit the default OWA server and it just knows which OWA server handles that user mailbox? I never saw this explained very well. Has anybody seen a write-up on this and could forward a link for this. Also an install guide for this type of config. _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ForestPrep Question
I need to re-install ForestPrep. I chose the wrong option during the setup and need to re-run to accept the correct setting. When I tried re-installing it, it just went through the setup and didn't give me the option to Create a new organization or join an existing 5.5. Know of a way to uninstall ForestPrep? Or have any other ideas? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ForestPrep Question
There's a removeorg switch available in the SP3 setup. You can run this, then re-run forestprep. You should be running forestprep from the SP3 media also. It's update /forestprep in that case. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 31, 2003 2:59 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ForestPrep Question Subject: ForestPrep Question I need to re-install ForestPrep. I chose the wrong option during the setup and need to re-run to accept the correct setting. When I tried re-installing it, it just went through the setup and didn't give me the option to Create a new organization or join an existing 5.5. Know of a way to uninstall ForestPrep? Or have any other ideas? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OE Marking POP Messages Read
Not true - they are being marked as read when the POP client pulls them. Once the mailbox is hit with a POP client, Outlook displays everything as read that it downloaded. Found out what is happening. Field users are using some free version of Eudora for Palm on their cell phones. This version of Eudora isn't quite to RFC spec and was not marking msgs as read when they were downloaded. All other clients were behaving as they should. This particular client did NOT mark them as read when retrieving mail from a 5.5 server. Once the user was migrated to a 2K server the client started marking them as read. I'm sure most of you don't care about this, but wanted to respond back w/ the solution for archive's sake. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OE Marking POP Messages Read Because they are marked as read on the client, not the server. -Original Message- From: Sean Winters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OE Marking POP Messages Read I know this is expected behavior for POP. On our current Exchange 5.5 server, messages are NOT marked as read after they are POPped. Why could this be? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OE Marking POP Messages Read I was just about to write that -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OE Marking POP Messages Read The fix is not to use POP3. On 07/31/03 07:50, Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is by design. I don't believe that there's a fix. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LDAP Query
AD by default will not allow LDAP searches. You must either bind or change AD if you want users to be able to search. As Ed mentions, you can use port 3268 on a GC to get users from all of the domains in your forest (most attributes, anyway). Otherwise, you'll just get users for the one domain. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LDAP Query But of course! Point the LDAP client to a GC, port 3268, with search base dc=aglets,dc=shoestring,dc=com (if your domain is aglets.shoestring.com). Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: LDAP Query In an all 2000 server (native mode) environment is it possible to query AD via LDAP? I know in Exchange you just use the Global address list, I however still have POP/SMTP clients that we would like to set up a Directory Service to allow them to search AD. I tried to add one of my Global Catalog servers as an LDAP server on an Outlook client but the server doesn't respond to the port 389 LDAP request. Has anyone ever seen this done? I thought AD used LDAP? Thanks, Chad Wasinger Systems Administrator Alta Colleges _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LDAP Query
Thanks Ed. That's exactly what we needed. Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Alta Colleges, inc. 303-464-2381 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LDAP Query But of course! Point the LDAP client to a GC, port 3268, with search base dc=aglets,dc=shoestring,dc=com (if your domain is aglets.shoestring.com). Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: LDAP Query In an all 2000 server (native mode) environment is it possible to query AD via LDAP? I know in Exchange you just use the Global address list, I however still have POP/SMTP clients that we would like to set up a Directory Service to allow them to search AD. I tried to add one of my Global Catalog servers as an LDAP server on an Outlook client but the server doesn't respond to the port 389 LDAP request. Has anyone ever seen this done? I thought AD used LDAP? Thanks, Chad Wasinger Systems Administrator Alta Colleges _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SPAMERS hitting my second MX record?
I use eDoxs (3rd party company that identifies spam. They use Brightmail). Getting a lot of spam, however. My first MX record is to dDoxs. My second is to my email gateway, in case eDoxs is down. I'm wondering if spammers can pick up on my second MX record and send directly to it. Please advise. TIA Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules?
I like the idea of me maintaining it better... but I am not seeing where to specify route by domain -Original Message- From: Greg Sachs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? I've had problems from a dynamic dns site on a cable modem sending to aol for a long time. ISP's smtp server is the only way to go - smarthost is one way, you can also set up an smtp connector to send mail to specific domains to your isp's smtp server such as aol.com. Your choice if you trust your isp's mail server more, or your ability to keep the list on your connector current for domains that won't except your outgoing email directly -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? Use your ISP's SMTP server as a smarthost for all outgoing mail. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bubba G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? I have architected for Fortune 10s... but this time I have a small server on a home network. I use DynDNS.ORG to update the A and MX records. AOL has just instituted a new policy rejecting any email server coming from a dynamic IP address. I have emailed them asking about this but I know they will respond with something like We are attempting to reduce SPAM... even though I reject SPAM on my server's SMTP connector based on IP because SPAMmers typically use the same ISPs and static IP addresses... and there are only a handful of ISPs that allow spammers knowingly. Anyone else had problems with this lately... or more importantly found a way around it (other than getting/paying for a static IP address)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAMERS hitting my second MX record?
Of course they can, and they will. A better way to do that second MX record is to direct it to a relay SMTP server that will simply hold the mail until the primary SMTP server is up. The Windows 2000 SMTP Service will do this just fine. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAMERS hitting my second MX record? I use eDoxs (3rd party company that identifies spam. They use Brightmail). Getting a lot of spam, however. My first MX record is to dDoxs. My second is to my email gateway, in case eDoxs is down. I'm wondering if spammers can pick up on my second MX record and send directly to it. Please advise. TIA Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAMERS hitting my second MX record?
My first MX record is to dDoxs. My second is to my email gateway, in case eDoxs is down. I'm wondering if spammers can pick up on my second MX record and send directly to it. Actually, it's very common for spammers to start at your lower priority MX records. It makes sense for exactly the reason you specified. Companies rarely put the expensive anti-spam software on their secondary MX relays. Ed recommended using a relay to HOLD the mail until the primary is available again. This method works great provided that most of your filtering is not done by RBL/SPAM listings (because the source IP has changed.) -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archiving Methods?
What is the best Archiving tool for Exchange 2000 mailboxes that are over 2 Gig? Needs to archived in a PST by date. Either Client or Server based. Thanks, Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Archiving Methods?
Why not AutoArchive? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Eric Holtzclaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 15:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Archiving Methods? What is the best Archiving tool for Exchange 2000 mailboxes that are over 2 Gig? Needs to archived in a PST by date. Either Client or Server based. Thanks, Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Archiving Methods?
Shift-Delete Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 6:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Archiving Methods? What is the best Archiving tool for Exchange 2000 mailboxes that are over 2 Gig? Needs to archived in a PST by date. Either Client or Server based. Thanks, Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Create a New Address Book
Hi All I am trying to create a new address book to coexist with my Global Address book. The new one will be for external addresses that I exported from Notes. I have them in a csv file. But am not sure of the proper way to create a new address book to use with Exchange 2k. I have Win2k Server and Exchange 2k. Can any one can point me in the right direction? I am having problems finding any info on doing this in E2k . Thanks in Advance Ronk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Create a New Address Book
In brief, you have to create mail-enabled contacts for those recipients. Populate them with a particular attribute that you can search on. Then you build an address list whose query returns this set of contacts. You could use the CSVDE tool to create them, I believe, but I am not sure. Or you can import them into a public folder and use them as Outlook-style contacts, but that isn't exactly what you asked for. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronk Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Create a New Address Book Hi All I am trying to create a new address book to coexist with my Global Address book. The new one will be for external addresses that I exported from Notes. I have them in a csv file. But am not sure of the proper way to create a new address book to use with Exchange 2k. I have Win2k Server and Exchange 2k. Can any one can point me in the right direction? I am having problems finding any info on doing this in E2k . Thanks in Advance Ronk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Archiving Methods?
Good one. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archiving Methods? Shift-Delete Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 6:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Archiving Methods? What is the best Archiving tool for Exchange 2000 mailboxes that are over 2 Gig? Needs to archived in a PST by date. Either Client or Server based. Thanks, Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
