RE: Open Relay/Spamcop
What do you get when you telnet into the server and try to send mail to a bogus address? Hello All and Happy Holidays! =20 I have a colleague whos Exchange 2000 server is being reported as Open Relay by spamcop for the past month. I have tested his relay by=20 setting up a POP account in Outlook, putting the server that is being=20 reported as Open relay as my Outgoing SMTP server. =3D20 =20 When I try to send a message using Outlook, I get a return message that 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay. I am relieved that it could not relay. That is good, however, why then is spamcop still reporting it to be=20 open relay? =3D20 =20 I have checked (over the phone) all his Virtual SMTP Server settings=20 to verify correct configuration. Everything seems to be checked or=20 unchecked as recommended by Microsoft. =20 We have Stopped/Started Services for SMTP =20 The Exchange 2000 server is behind a NAT and I have looked into the=20 possibility of this. I have been out on the spamcop site and for the=20 life of me cannot find a way to make them check the server again to=20 see if it is closed relay like ORDB does. =3D20 =20 Any ideas or comments =3D20 =20 =20 =20 Samantha Bridges Communications Technician Macomb Intermediate School District 44001 Garfield Road Clinton Township MI 48038-1100 (586) 228-3300 =20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.misd.net =20 =20 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain=20 confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended=20 recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all=20 copies of the original message. =20 =3D20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=3Dexchangetext_mo de=3D= lang=3Denglish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
You guys crack me up. =) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 The Swynk List... Exciting and New... Climb Aboard... We'll be flaming YOU... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Or is it... The LOVE Boat... Exciting and New... Climb Aboard... We're expecting YOU... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 We have a love connection!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Hi Neighbor, I'm just over a ways, off of I75 and Caruth Haven. Right across from Northpark mall in the big ugly gold towers. Traffic on 75 is horrid right now. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I am owned by my MSDN cd cases and Microsoft pens. Long live the overlord! It's raining here (Dallas, TX), too. (A very wet) Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Jolyon, This Greg doesn't see it that way... He thinks the pens and mousepads are evil, and will corrupt you. But note, he he thinks utility software should be free. (he mentioned Novell by name) You missed the last time this subject came up, it raged for a week with no real conclusion. He is very consistently inconsistant in his logic. Its raining here too Rachel -Original Message- From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I was going to ask what form this compensation took. So it's on the level of the free pens the drugs companies give to doctors rather than being so much greater than the salary your employer pays that your loyalty lies utterly with Microsoft then? *Phew* Also, can I say again that hawaiilawyer.com sounds impossibly glamorous as I prepare to trudge out of our crumbly dive of an office and across a very cold and soggy London in the dark. I love my job but I still need vitamin D. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The sudden absence of We Love Our MVPs Post-It pads and MSDN CD cases notwithstanding. The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5
makes popcorn -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 It's raining Manna! Hallelujah! -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 That's like manna from heaven! Thanks Erik. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Read, understand and read again the MS Exchange Backup and Disaster Recovery Whitepaper. Link to it is in the FAQ or is google-able. Then read it again. If you need to recover a single mailbox (a relatively unlikely occurrence if you follow the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method - also in the FAQ) you can do the full restore to another server, then extract out the needed mailbox and merge it into the live server store, affecting no other users. Read the Whitepaper! -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 I agree. Although, what happens when an idiot user trashes their inbox and then convienently forgets to tell me until after the 1 week retention period? Restoring the entire store would be a bad idea(tm) because it was set everybody back to the state the were in when the backup was made, right? I agree Brick backups are bad idea, I just don't have any better one's at the moment. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Ok, but what is BLB going to do for you? If you backup the whole store at once the normal way, you are going to be back up and running a heck of a lot faster than if you had to restore mailboxes one by one. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 6:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Murphy's law says that any working device can crap out and any moment. This box is running on a gateway 1U server with no RAID drives. All it takes is one hardware failure on a drive to take out the Private store and I am screwed. This company doesn't even have any tape drives that are large enough to hold a backup of the mailboxes. I've had to use Backup-to-disk folders on other servers to get space to hold the backups. Yes, I know I need tape drives. Yes, I know that I need backup exec 9 (and the exchange agent). Those are all planned purchased in Q1 of '04. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 It could tank at any moment then this means you should use brick level backups. Where did you hear that or am i missing something From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 07:35:21 -0600 I've inherited this IT environment and I can't spend any money until Jan. 5th. Oh, by the way, this exchange box as not been backed up since it was built 2.5 years ago! Brick backups are start because this box could tank at any moment. I'm purchasing Veritas BE 9 in January, but I cannot get it until then. I might have a trial copy of BE 9 and I can use until then, though. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 You're not going to like this answer, but brick backup is a great big kludgy crutch for administrators who insist on managing their Exchange environment like they would a Microsoft Mail environment.
RE: EDBUTIL or ESEUTIL
Exactly. -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EDBUTIL or ESEUTIL Thanks ! I did check my Event log and it said that there is only about 46MB of free white space available. I guess no point in doing the defrag then huh ? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 12:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EDBUTIL or ESEUTIL Don't bother unless you will get a substantial amount of space back. As another respondent told you, check your event logs to see how much white space there is. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RBHATIA Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EDBUTIL or ESEUTIL I'm running Exchange 5.5 on NT Server 4.0 Is it a good idea to do an offline defrag of my information store (as it hasn't been done in almost 6 months) and the size is considerably large. I'm aware that Exchange 5.5 is known to do a good job with the online defrag, however, would it still help to cut down on the size of my store by doing an offline defrag ? I have read all of Microsoft Q Articles on this topic but would still like to know about a real world scenario. Since it's Exchange 5.5 I will be using ESEUTIL. Moreover, this would help me when I upgrade to Exchange 2000 in a few months as it will reduce the size of my information store. Also, any warnings I should consider before I do the defrag ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EDBUTIL or ESEUTIL
Check the event viewer for event 1221. That will tell you how much white space you have in your database. -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EDBUTIL or ESEUTIL I'm running Exchange 5.5 on NT Server 4.0 Is it a good idea to do an offline defrag of my information store (as it hasn't been done in almost 6 months) and the size is considerably large. I'm aware that Exchange 5.5 is known to do a good job with the online defrag, however, would it still help to cut down on the size of my store by doing an offline defrag ? I have read all of Microsoft Q Articles on this topic but would still like to know about a real world scenario. Since it's Exchange 5.5 I will be using ESEUTIL. Moreover, this would help me when I upgrade to Exchange 2000 in a few months as it will reduce the size of my information store. Also, any warnings I should consider before I do the defrag ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does anyone know how to get rid of unwanted emails?
It sounds like you want to drop them at the relay server; not the exchange server. -Original Message- From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Does anyone know how to get rid of unwanted emails? Hmm, sounds like you have configured it correctly. You have removed the mailboxes right? Not just restricted their send/receive or something? I'm not sure what would happen in that case. I only have the one server (and it is an Exchange 5.5 machine), so I don't know if it is related to the existence of the relay server or not. But yes, you can track what comes into your Exchange server. If you have the smtp protocol logging set to medium I believe it should show you if the relay server is trying to pass those addresses on. And you might be able to see what you need with a lower logging level than that. I just have mine set there and I can see mail coming in for addresses on my black hole list. You should be able to see if it is bouncing the addresses or accepting them. You'll have to find a way to manage a fair amount of log data if you get a lot of email coming in but it shouldn't take too long to do, just send your own test message and then look for it. Or just look for one of the bad addresses. Ronni * Once you embrace the fact that most folks in the world don't get it, you waste a lot less time trying to teach pigs to dance. -Cthulhu Jones, June 2000 - -Original Message- From: Hilda De Nigris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 6:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Does anyone know how to get rid of unwanted emails? Hi Ronni, I'm having difficulty understanding what you mean by alternate. I created a DL called DEPARTURES, then under the EMAIL ADDRESSES tab of the DL I added all the SMTP addresses of the employees that have left the firm. Under the GENERAL tab, there is no one listed because there is no physical mailbox. But, when I look at my relay server, I still see messages held in the queue of the addresses I listed in this DL list. The Relay should be sending these emails to the Exchange Server since the addresses are valid even though they don't belong to anyone. Is there any way I can monitor on the Exchange Server as to which emails got sent to the Black-hole? I think you misread/misunderstood. You want to list all the e-mail addresses that you want to go poof as alternate internet addresses _for_ the DL. The dl has no addresses in it. So when it is expanded it expands to nothing. Hence the black hole. Ronni * In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is. - -Original Message- From: Hilda De Nigris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Does anyone know how to get rid of unwanted emails? We have a relay system that holds so much unwanted emails from users who have changed their SMTP addresses as well as those that have left the firm. I read a TID that says if you create a DL (distribution list) on the Exchange (5.5) Server and list all the SMTP addresses inside the DL, that the Exchange server will just drop all these unwanted emails into a black hole. Well, I tried this and obviously it does not seem to work. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does anyone know how to get rid of unwanted emails?
Then the instructions Ronni gave you will take of it. -Original Message- From: Hilda De Nigris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Does anyone know how to get rid of unwanted emails? The Relay Server is forwarding them to the Exchange. What we don't want is Exchange to send them back to the Relay. When it does, they all sit in a DEADLETTER Queue and 99% of the time, the sender is unknown. Besides, 99% of these emails are SPAM anyway. It sounds like you want to drop them at the relay server; not the exchange server. -Original Message- From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Does anyone know how to get rid of unwanted emails? Hmm, sounds like you have configured it correctly. You have removed the mailboxes right? Not just restricted their send/receive or something? I'm not sure what would happen in that case. I only have the one server (and it is an Exchange 5.5 machine), so I don't know if it is related to the existence of the relay server or not. But yes, you can track what comes into your Exchange server. If you have the smtp protocol logging set to medium I believe it should show you if the relay server is trying to pass those addresses on. And you might be able to see what you need with a lower logging level than that. I just have mine set there and I can see mail coming in for addresses on my black hole list. You should be able to see if it is bouncing the addresses or accepting them. You'll have to find a way to manage a fair amount of log data if you get a lot of email coming in but it shouldn't take too long to do, just send your own test message and then look for it. Or just look for one of the bad addresses. Ronni * Once you embrace the fact that most folks in the world don't get it, you waste a lot less time trying to teach pigs to dance. -Cthulhu Jones, June 2000 - -Original Message- From: Hilda De Nigris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 6:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Does anyone know how to get rid of unwanted emails? Hi Ronni, I'm having difficulty understanding what you mean by alternate. I created a DL called DEPARTURES, then under the EMAIL ADDRESSES tab of the DL I added all the SMTP addresses of the employees that have left the firm. Under the GENERAL tab, there is no one listed because there is no physical mailbox. But, when I look at my relay server, I still see messages held in the queue of the addresses I listed in this DL list. The Relay should be sending these emails to the Exchange Server since the addresses are valid even though they don't belong to anyone. Is there any way I can monitor on the Exchange Server as to which emails got sent to the Black-hole? I think you misread/misunderstood. You want to list all the e-mail addresses that you want to go poof as alternate internet addresses _for_ the DL. The dl has no addresses in it. So when it is expanded it expands to nothing. Hence the black hole. Ronni * In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is. - -Original Message- From: Hilda De Nigris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Does anyone know how to get rid of unwanted emails? We have a relay system that holds so much unwanted emails from users who have changed their SMTP addresses as well as those that have left the firm. I read a TID that says if you create a DL (distribution list) on the Exchange (5.5) Server and list all the SMTP addresses inside the DL, that the Exchange server will just drop all these unwanted emails into a black hole. Well, I tried this and obviously it does not seem to work. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ntbackup scripts
As long as ntbackup is creating the log file, you can use blat to send it. -Original Message- From: Eric Holtzclaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ntbackup scripts Does anyone have a script/bat file that emails the Ntbackup log files on a daily bases? Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ntbackup scripts
Thanks! I like it! -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ntbackup scripts Here is an old email response to a simular request that Ken Cornetet supplied some time ago. I guess you could change it to your needs. Enjoy! Use the GUI to create the backup selection file everything.bks. Obviously, you want this file to include your Exchange information stores. Change the BNCHMARK DLT1 SCSI Sequential Device to whatever the name of your tape drive is. See Q267574. This batch file needs grep, recode, and blat. Use your favorite search engine. rem * rem * rem * Perform fullback to whatever tape is in the drive and email rem * report rem * rem * Ken Cornetet - 06/10/2002 rem * rem * Revision History rem * rem * WhenWhoWhat rem * --- rem * 06/10/2002 Ken Cornetet Original Issue rem * 06/24/2002 Ken Cornetet Added RSM command per Q267574 rem * rem * set [EMAIL PROTECTED] set SMTP=ntserver1 set NAME=FULL BACKUP %DATE% %TIME% rem this is where NTBackup writes it's (unicode - blech) logs set LOGS=%USERPROFILE%\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Windows NT\NTBackup\data c: cd \backup rem Delete any extranious log files del %LOGS%\backup*.log rem rem * Have removable storage management look at tape in drive rem * (See Q267574 for details) rem start /wait rsm refresh /lfBNCHMARK DLT1 SCSI Sequential Device c:\bin\sleep 30 rem rem * Do Backup rem start /wait ntbackup backup @c:\backup\everything.bks /M normal /J %NAME% /P DLT /N %NAME% /l:s /HC:on /UM /D %NAME% rem rem * find newest (should be only) log file rem dir /s /b /o-d %LOGS%\backup*.log c:\backup\backup.tmp set /P FILE= c:\backup\backup.tmp rem rem * Make ASCII version of log file rem c:\bin\recode -f unicode..us %FILE% log.txt rem rem * Append list of open files to the report rem echo OPEN FILES log.txt net file log.txt rem rem * Set subject for email rem set SUBJ=Backup ran OK grep -v Error: You do not have permission log1.txt findstr /i error: log1.txt if not ERRORLEVEL 1 set SUBJ=Backup ran - FAILED rem rem * Send email rem c:\bin\blat log.txt -t %RECIPIENT% -subject %SUBJ% -server %SMTP% -f %RECIPIENT% rem rem * Move log file to our directory rem move /Y %FILE% c:\backup -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -=-=-=-=-= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Candee Vaglica Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions As long as ntbackup is creating the log file, you can use blat to send it. -Original Message- From: Eric Holtzclaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ntbackup scripts Does anyone have a script/bat file that emails the Ntbackup log files on a daily bases? Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter
RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations
Symantec's gateway will do *most* of that. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New AV Gateway Recommendations I'm looking for a new AV gateway product. I'm looking for something that has the following features. Right now we use NAI Websheild SMTP gateway which does a pretty good job but is getting rather dated and it does not appear that this program will updated past its 4.5 version. The program has some nice features, but anything NAI blows, the support gets worse by the day, so I want to move on. The current setup I have is a single server that receives to WebSheild for AV scanning and keyword content filtering. Then it passes it on via port 26 to my MailFrontier for antispam scanning (both run on the same box) which then finally passes it on to the Exchange server boxen on port 25 just like usual. Here are the features I am looking for * Keyword Blocking * The ability to turn anti spam off and just use keyword blocking. * AV scanner * Ability to pass the mail on another port (such as when an AV gateway and an Antispam gateway are on the same box) * Recipient Exclusion * Sender exclusion (allow mail to pass directly from specified email addresses without scanning for content or virus's) * Originator Blocking (just dump any email that comes from specified persons) * A bonus would be that if it could do a lookup against my GAL and just dump any email for an address that does not exist * Must run on Wintel platform * Customizeable NDR's for content filtering, etc Martin Blackstone Director, Information Technologies Microsoft Exchange MVP Superior Access Insurance Services 949.470.2111 x279 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations
You mean they don't??! -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations It's not. It still has some serious limitations. I also made them aware of those, but they simply told me to request it as a future feature. Yeah right. And Microsft reads all the e-mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 1:03 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: New AV Gateway Recommendations Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations Supposedly they are working on improving the filtering piece of it. They of course blame it on MS and vsapi. Appretly all that happens is that Ex passes the friendly name not the email address, blah blah blah. And their content filtering is not all that great either. Having said all that I have not played with their gateway solution so maybe that's a ton better. Just my 2cents -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations There is no additional agent for Exchange. If you buy Corp. Ed., it does not include the AV/Filtering for Exchange. And, IMHO, it sucks rocks. I like Corp. ed., but the Exchange server piece bites, and I have told them that plenty of times. The A/V scanning is fine, but the content filtering leaves a LOT to be desired. It is also not a gateway piece (though they have one available which was mentioned earlier). Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: DL.Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:30 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: New AV Gateway Recommendations Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations Are you referring to an additional agent for Norton (Symantec) corporate antivirus, or the Norton (Symantec) antivirus filter? The avf we have is only able to filter by sender/subject line or set 'content types', in other words, quite limited... If you are talking about an additional agent, do you happen to have a link lying around for product information? TIA Thank you, Mitchell D. Lawrence **Good|Cheap|Fast (Pick Two)** -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Doody Posted At: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:22 PM Posted To: ~Exchange Discussion~ Conversation: New AV Gateway Recommendations Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations I must recommend the Exchange agent by Symantec, you buy Norton Corporate and get the Exchange agent separate, install this, you get a nice web GUI, and viruses should never land in your users mailboxes ever again. Very customizable, you can have it mail all people involved, it can set size limits, it can be told not to allow unscanable (encrypted) items, but that is a pain in the arse if its genuine! Its good. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 October 2003 17:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations Symantec's gateway will do *most* of that. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New AV Gateway Recommendations I'm looking for a new AV gateway product. I'm looking for something that has the following features. Right now we use NAI Websheild SMTP gateway which does a pretty good job but is getting rather dated and it does not appear that this program will updated past its 4.5 version. The program has some nice features, but anything NAI blows, the support gets worse by the day, so I want to move on. The current setup I have is a single server that receives to WebSheild for AV scanning and keyword content filtering. Then it passes it on via port 26 to my MailFrontier for antispam scanning (both run on the same box) which then finally passes it on to the Exchange server boxen on port 25 just like usual. Here are the features I am looking for * Keyword Blocking * The ability to turn anti spam off and just use keyword blocking. * AV scanner * Ability to pass the mail on another port (such as when an AV gateway and an Antispam gateway are on the same box) * Recipient Exclusion * Sender exclusion (allow mail to pass directly from specified email addresses without scanning for content or virus's) * Originator Blocking (just dump any email that comes from specified persons) * A bonus would be that if it could do a lookup against my GAL and just dump any email for an address that does not exist * Must run on Wintel platform * Customizeable NDR's
RE: auto BCC'ing all messages * Exchange 5.5 *
That will only catch incoming mail. Check out journaling, that's probably what you need. -Original Message- From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: auto BCC'ing all messages * Exchange 5.5 * Yes, goto User's account, under Delivery Options tab, In the Alt. recip. Box, Select Mailbox of Additional recip., then Check box to deliver to both accounts. Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: auto BCC'ing all messages Has anyone had a request to automatically BCC all messages being sent out of a mailbox also be sent to another user? for example Joe smith is suspected of wrongdoing. His boss Bob doesn't know for sure. So Bob requests that all e-mail's Joe sends also be sent to him. Is this possible? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-464-2381 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts?
Make sure you have the Outlook address book service installed. -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? This option is grayed out for some reason. Any reason why it would be? Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? In Outlook. Right click on Contacts, Properties, Outlook Address Book, Check the box that says Show this folder as an address book -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can Outlook address list include local contacts? In Outlook 2000, using Exchange 2000, when I create a new email message and click the To button, I only get entries that are on AD (e.g., Global Address list). Is there way to have the entries in the local Contacts folder to also appear in that list? I didn't see that open in the show names from combo box. My users have a lot of personal email addresses that they don't want in a public address list, but still want to use them as a typical address. Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to cut down on spam
You can block by domain name at the IMS level. (message filtering under IMS properties) There is junk mail filtering in Outlook. If you have a gateway product, check the documentation, some include filtering. -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: how to cut down on spam Hi all... We are running Exchange 5.5 and as most of you we receive a lot of spam in the company. My company does not want to buy any spam sofware as it cost a lot of money. Is there anything built into exchange that will help reduce the spam? Is there anything that could be done on the Outlook Client that will reduce the spam? We are also running GroupShield. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 5.5 generates blank emails
I don't see 314532 listed. Have a look at that one. -Original Message- From: Lentz, Wayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA 5.5 generates blank emails Hello list, I'm having a problem with OWA 5.5 displaying emails with empty message bodies. It works fine for Admins, so I'm assuming it's a permissions issue. I've gone through these QArticles: Q301428, Q295067, Q269868, Q313131, and Q309508. The server is locked down pretty hard, but minimal permissions required by OWA are met, compared to our old (non-production but working) server. Seems that I've run through all this a dozen times and I'm just missing a single acl that's kinking up the operation. Anyone know what I should do to get this thing working? Here's our setup: Exchange server - NT4 SP6, Exchange 5.5 SP4 OWA server - NT4 SP6, OWA 5.5 SP4, IIS4 Both servers on the same (our only) subnet. SSL/128 is required by IIS. Appreciate any help, Wayne Lentz UT2003 Server Admin Knust-SBO _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 5.5 generates blank emails
Most welcome. -Original Message- From: Lentz, Wayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 generates blank emails Candee, many thanks to you for that link. Just needed to give the users change rights to the server's temp folder. 0_o My Google search terms: owa message body blank Didn't turn up that QArticle; need to refine the search skills I guess. Cheers and beers to you, Wayne Lentz -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 generates blank emails I don't see 314532 listed. Have a look at that one. -Original Message- From: Lentz, Wayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA 5.5 generates blank emails Hello list, I'm having a problem with OWA 5.5 displaying emails with empty message bodies. It works fine for Admins, so I'm assuming it's a permissions issue. I've gone through these QArticles: Q301428, Q295067, Q269868, Q313131, and Q309508. The server is locked down pretty hard, but minimal permissions required by OWA are met, compared to our old (non-production but working) server. Seems that I've run through all this a dozen times and I'm just missing a single acl that's kinking up the operation. Anyone know what I should do to get this thing working? Here's our setup: Exchange server - NT4 SP6, Exchange 5.5 SP4 OWA server - NT4 SP6, OWA 5.5 SP4, IIS4 Both servers on the same (our only) subnet. SSL/128 is required by IIS. Appreciate any help, Wayne Lentz UT2003 Server Admin Knust-SBO _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send a CC to an internet address as well
Create a custom recipient -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Send a CC to an internet address as well Hi there... Exchange 5.5 Latest SP. I was looking for the setting in the admin to allow me to CC all incoming mail to an inbox to an (external) internet address that is not in the global address list. Where can I do this? I know how to for an address in the global address list... Thanks! Dustin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 and firewall
Wins is needed for the 98 machines -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and firewall Yes soho running dhcp. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and firewall You should be running WINS if you are using NT and 98 client. Also what is running DHCP? Is it the SOHO? -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Using standard 192.x.x.x. and 255.255.255.0. There are no wins. Pretty simple set up single server running exchange and 1 database program. This works great. I don't think I need to open any addiotnal ports since everyone is behind the firewall and the server is recving email! Fire wall is a soinicwall soho3 -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and firewall Check your subnet and make sure they are correct for Class B or C or how ever you did it. Also check all your DNS and WINS to make sure the clients are routing properly Alex -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Quick questions. Running 5.5 sp3 nt4.0 sp6. Server was not behind firewall running on public IP's. Yesterday installed Firewall 15 wkstations (win98 outlook 2000) and server behind firewall. Gave everyone Private Ips and a 1 to 1 nat for exchange ip address. Everything works internally but outlook on the win98 clients became very slow opening. Most units get the server not available retry Or work off line. I can retry and outlook will eventually hook up but it is way to slow. Is there something I missed. Do not need access to exchange server from outside the network Thanks for any help _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them. -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it? When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get the following msg. One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server and have been deactivated. This could be because some of the parameters are not supported or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules. Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2019 Error
Try searching event ID: www.eventid.net -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 2019 Error When I have seen this error I typically have to reboot the server. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2019 Error Hi I am getting 2019 error on Exchange and it is getting hanged. Any solutions Event details are as follows: Event 2019: The server was unable to allocate from the system nonpaged pool because the pool was empty. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
No, it's actually a size limit, they're limited to 32k; which is what can fit in a single data packet. -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place? Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org + This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. ++ -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them. -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it? When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get the following msg. One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server and have been deactivated. This could be because some of the parameters are not supported or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules. Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2019 Error
Any time. ;) -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 2019 Error Thanks, David!! -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 2019 Error Try searching event ID: www.eventid.net -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 2019 Error When I have seen this error I typically have to reboot the server. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:2019 Error Hi I am getting 2019 error on Exchange and it is getting hanged. Any solutions Event details are as follows: Event 2019: The server was unable to allocate from the system nonpaged pool because the pool was empty. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
Of course you do! =) -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Not necessarily the number of rules, but the total amount of space that they take up on the server (for server-side rules). The max amount is 32k of storage space. I don't know of a way to see how much space your current rules take, other than adding rules until you can't add no mo. As Candee [1] said, try consolidating them to conserve space. [1] I like Candee! -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place? Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org + This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. ++ -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them. -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it? When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get the following msg. One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server and have been deactivated. This could be because some of the parameters are not supported or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules. Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook connect problem with Exchange Server
Then it is a problem with that PC, or the connection. I don't remember the original question, but start there. -Original Message- From: Niko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook connect problem with Exchange Server Hi Candee, Thanks for your replay I try setting up a other user on this PC -DON'T WORK I try setting up this user name (problem user) on other machine -it is work ok Niko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook connect problem with Exchange Server
Did you try setting up a different user on this PC? Did you try setting up this user name on a different PC? -Original Message- From: Niko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook connect problem with Exchange Server Hi all, I have problem with outlook to access an exchange server I do know how to set outlook up to access an exchange server. I have 30 workstations accessing it now, it is only this one that will not connect. Everytime I hit Check Name I get the error - Outlook could not log on. Check to make sure you are connected to the network and are using the proper server mailbox name. The Microsoft Exchange Address Bool was unable to log on to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if the problem persists. Can ping the Exchange server by name and by IP. Try add winnt\system32\drivers\etc in the HOSTS file give a line for exchange: IP ADDRESSCOMPUTER_NAME Still can't connect System: Windows 2000 Workstation OutlookXP Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 Anyone got another solution? Thanks Niko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HIdden Mailboxes
Set it up for the user first; then hide it. Or use a public folder, and assign permissions. -Original Message- From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HIdden Mailboxes Exchange 5.5 - SP4 W2K - SP3 I guess it's not possible to hide a mailbox and still be able to access it by another user?? How do you handle a situation where, for example, you are replacing an employee so you are going to have a mailbox set up to receive responses to an advertisement. But you don't want that mailbox to be visible to the rest of the users since they will most likely figure out what's going on?? Thanks, John Orban System Administrator The Country School www.countryschool.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV and Exchange
Personally, I exclude all the Exchange directories. If it's not specifically listed under the directories that are okay to scan, then I wouldn't. -Original Message- From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV and Exchange I read through the article but it does not mention the exchsrvr\imcdata directory. Is it alright to run file based scanning against this directory? Thanks. Doug -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV and Exchange This might help: 245822 XGEN: Recommendations for Troubleshooting an Exchange Computer with Antivirus Software Installed -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 5:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV and Exchange Can i ask u all why its not wise to run virus scans on the exchange directories? Or am completely of base here? NT4/sp6 Exchange 5.5 /sp4 Thanks David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV and Exchange
This might help: 245822 XGEN: Recommendations for Troubleshooting an Exchange Computer with Antivirus Software Installed -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 5:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV and Exchange Can i ask u all why its not wise to run virus scans on the exchange directories? Or am completely of base here? NT4/sp6 Exchange 5.5 /sp4 Thanks David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antivirus for exchange..follow-up
This KB has a list: 245822 -Original Message- From: Nunez, Danny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Antivirus for exchange..follow-up One a similar subject. NT 4.0 sp6a, Exchange 5.5 sp4 (?) with OWA on the server box. Besides AV for the Exchange, I also have an AV software scanning the disks and scanning disk accesses. I have excluded pub.mdb, priv.mdb and the pagefile from the AV scan. My question: Is there anything else I should exclude from the scan? Say log files or MTA directories? I have not heard performance complaints from the users (the box is not overloaded by any stretch of the imagination) but do not want to cause trouble with the smooth operation of the box. Any suggestion or advice is greatly appreciated. TIA Danny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mustafa E. Senyuz Sent: 20 February 2003 10:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Antivirus for exchange Hi, I'm trying to find a good antivirus solution for exchange. I checked out Norton AV for Exchange, McCafee and TrendMicro's antivirus for exchange. TrendMicro's seems good. Which one do you advice? Or is there any better product? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Offline Folders
Here's a Q dealing with synchronization problems: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=/support/outlook/synchro/defa ult.asp -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Offline Folders Exchange 5.5. Windows 2000, Outlook 2000. I have a user that keeps getting a synchronization error message.. 7:46:32 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar' 7:46:32 Error synchronizing message 'Network Team Staff' 7:46:32 [80070057-501-0-322] 7:46:32 The client operation failed. 7:46:32 Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store However, Offline folders are not enabled under Tools - Services or Tools - Options. We've rebuilt her profile a couple of times, didn't help. If Offline folders aren't enabled, why would it be trying to synchronize??? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments
Exchange server? Any AV on the exchange server? -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments I encountered a strange behaviour with Outlook 2000. I sent myself an email with about 41 attachments (all Excel files) and when I received the email and first double clicked on it to open it, Id' get an error message saying Unable to open one or more attachments and would display a blank email without the attachments. Then after a couple of minutes when I'd try to open the same email again, it was able to open and display the attachments. I'm running Outlook 2000 on a Win2K Professional machine. I do have NAV running with File System Protection enabled. I even tried disabling Real Time protection before opening the email but got the same message. This is not system specific as I tested it on multiple machines. Any ideas ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments
The antivirus is scanning the attachment. -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments Norton Anti Virus for MS Exchange running on Exchange server. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments Exchange server? Any AV on the exchange server? -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments I encountered a strange behaviour with Outlook 2000. I sent myself an email with about 41 attachments (all Excel files) and when I received the email and first double clicked on it to open it, Id' get an error message saying Unable to open one or more attachments and would display a blank email without the attachments. Then after a couple of minutes when I'd try to open the same email again, it was able to open and display the attachments. I'm running Outlook 2000 on a Win2K Professional machine. I do have NAV running with File System Protection enabled. I even tried disabling Real Time protection before opening the email but got the same message. This is not system specific as I tested it on multiple machines. Any ideas ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders
Try recreating his profile. -Original Message- From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders This PC had a problem after a power outage. I have gotten it running fine except for one problem. I get that error when trying to open a mailbox. Now, I can goto another PC and open this users mailbox no problem so it is not a problem with the info store. On this PC you can pingthe mail server, DNS is working correctly and anything else network related is working fine. Now, when I go into exchange properties and reenter the users name and tell it to check name, I get this: THe name could not be resolved. The microsoft Exchange Address Boook was unable to log on to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer... AGain, the server is fine as all other users are working fine and this user can goto another system and check mail. There is something still wrong with this system. ITs running 2k pro and I have reinstalled outlook 2k and SP3. Nothing has changed. I have also set the logon network security to None in hopes that I could force logon credentials to the server but when I try to open outlook it just goes straight to the above error again, ignoring the need for authentication. Anyone have any ideas? This is my VP;s system and reinstall is not really an option. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas BLB
Have you checked the archives? Have you read the faq? -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Veritas BLB Internet.com said this got rejected. So I'll try again. I just got done installing Veritas 9, the upgrade gagged so I spent 3 = hours on the phone with veritas fixing everything. They are so backed up that = any call more than a few minutes immediately goes to upper level tech = support. The guy mentioned how much better 9 is and mentioned that it can do BLB pretty well now. The support SIS etc. Anyone have any input on this? I already have read the BLBs are bad stuff. But I'm interested to see = what people have say. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange version standard or enterprise
From the faq: 3.53 Q: How do I determine whether I have the Standard or Enterprise version of Exchange Server 5.5 Installed? A: To determine whether you have a Standard or Enterprise version of Exchange Server 5.5 installed, check the Windows NT Server Event Viewer Application log on startup. The following event will be logged when the Exchange Information Store (IS) starts on an Enterprise Edition Exchange Server: Event Id: 1217 Source: MSExchangeIS Type: Information Category: General Description: Information store with unlimited capacity started The Standard version will log the following event: Event ID 1216 Source: MSExchangeIS Private Type: Information Category: General Description: Information store with limited storage capacity enabled -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange version standard or enterprise Hi - This sounds like it may be the most asked question but it does not seem easy to find. I'm trying to find out what Exchange version was installed on this server that I inhherited, Standard or Enterprise. The Server in sunnning on WinNT 4.0 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP4. Thanks Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse e-mail disclaimer here: http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1
Is the user's mailbox hidden? -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1 Help me please. Have ex2k sp3 server only server with exchange. Have one account that can access mailbox thru OWA no problems. Remotely from his home office can access thru outlook 2000 sr1. From in house workstation running XP and outllook 2002 cannot match name to address list. I can see other names on exch server thru outlook 2002 but not the one I need. I set up another xp system with outlook 2000 sr1 not attached to any domain just in it's own workgroup and it connects and opens this users mailbox. What am I missing?? I need his workstation to work with 2002 outlook! Thanks .+--xm ,)r(ື \檆b=!6 0 zǚ1r,:.˛ m隊[hy\z[,)rɄZ Zvh'+-i٢2 G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Problem under Exch 5.5
How large is the pst? -Original Message- From: Wilson, Fenton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Problem under Exch 5.5 User has 2000 SR-1 9.0.0.4527, with a large PST, has 3 emails in outbox which do not clear though they get sent out whenever he hits Send/Receive. He is unable to delete items from his Personal Folder Inbox- gets message the messenger interface has returned an unknown error and he is unable to clear reminders. Exchange 5.5 on NT4 SP6a Any suggestions? TIA, Fenton Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000 on XP box
Is he sure he has an Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook 2000 on XP box 1. Recreate Outlook Profile? 2. Tools/ Options/Mail Services/Reconfigure Mail Support ..etc etc... - Original Message - From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 5:59 PM Subject: Outlook 2000 on XP box Don't find way to install Microsoft exchange server connector on Outlook 2000 installed on an XP box. Please advise. Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000 on XP box
Yabbut. You can use Martin's. ;) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook 2000 on XP box Heck, Im not sure I have one. - Original Message - From: Candee Vaglica [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:20 AM Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 on XP box Is he sure he has an Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook 2000 on XP box 1. Recreate Outlook Profile? 2. Tools/ Options/Mail Services/Reconfigure Mail Support ..etc etc... - Original Message - From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 5:59 PM Subject: Outlook 2000 on XP box Don't find way to install Microsoft exchange server connector on Outlook 2000 installed on an XP box. Please advise. Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
In the Exchange Administrator? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not seeing the IS Maintenance tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
This might help: http://www.equiinet.com/press/pressreleases/24_06_2002.htm -Original Message- From: Archie Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very convincing. The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. ...Archie Call Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ugh, Argh I know it's here, I can't find it.
Here you are. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;314532 -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 2:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ugh, Argh I know it's here, I can't find it. Ok you know in OWA 5.5 SPK4 the issue when you click open email message and no text appears in body, only a reply or forward will display it ? It's a easy fix I've done it, I just can't find the fix, the troubleshooting OWA from MS URL no longer exists either. I know it's not a full blown diag problem, I know it's a simple one... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
Call PSS -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Online Defragmentation I have just this on the Event Viewer. What should I do? Event ID: 184 Source: ESE97 Description: MSExchangeIS ((353) ) Online defragmentation of database 'D:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB' terminated prematurely after encountering unexpected error -1019. Everything is still working fine. I found some thing like this on technet, but it have the unexpected error -1018 Any info is helpful Thank Tony Nguyen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using a pub folder for the list
Subscribing Public Folders to Internet Mailing Lists http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/Subscribe.asp -Original Message- From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:jmartinez;tmi-la.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using a pub folder for the list Hi all, Can someone repost on how to use a public folder for subscribing to the list? Thx. Johnny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
Please include the original message in your replies. If you're using the web interface, please check the Quote message in reply checkbox. -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Domain names are spectore.com and worldtitaniumcouncil.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying
3.73 Q: How can I configure my Exchange server so it can't be used as an open relay? A: http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696 Is the guest account enabled? Q196626: Guest Account Allows Relaying Regardless of Routing Restrictions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying You should get a 550 right there. Choose the Reroute mail option instead and under Routing restrictions Check the Hosts and Clients with these IP addresses option and do not put any entries in there. restart the IMS. -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:EdE;stainsafe.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying This is my telnet session Helo stainsafe.com Mail from: Rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] No denial message. -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying Are you giving a local host or an external host name as your send from? -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:EdE;stainsafe.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying Hello group. I am using Exchange 5.5 server with service pack 4. This server has the SMTP interface installed and it being used to route SMTP mail. For the life of me I can not figure out why this server is allowing SMTP mail to relay. I have the option Do not reroute incoming SMTP mail checked. I have restarted the IMS a few times. But when I telnet and send an email to a hotmail address, I do not get an error stating relaying is denied. It sends the message through. Is there anything that I am missing that is allowing mail to relay? *This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Stainsafe Inc. or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.* _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Stainsafe Inc. or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.* _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List
RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying
I must be confused. I thought you said you had Do not reroute incoming SMTP mail checked. -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:EdE;stainsafe.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying Guest account was disabled. This is an excellent article. What is weird is this is exactly how I have this setup. Unfortunately I have inherited this stupid server. So my main objective here is to rebuild it from scratch because I have no confidence in the original configuration of this server. Thanks to all for your support. I have clarified that I am not going crazy. :) Ed -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:cvaglica;bckpc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying 3.73 Q: How can I configure my Exchange server so it can't be used as an open relay? A: http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696 Is the guest account enabled? Q196626: Guest Account Allows Relaying Regardless of Routing Restrictions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying You should get a 550 right there. Choose the Reroute mail option instead and under Routing restrictions Check the Hosts and Clients with these IP addresses option and do not put any entries in there. restart the IMS. -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:EdE;stainsafe.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying This is my telnet session Helo stainsafe.com Mail from: Rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] No denial message. -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying Are you giving a local host or an external host name as your send from? -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:EdE;stainsafe.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying Hello group. I am using Exchange 5.5 server with service pack 4. This server has the SMTP interface installed and it being used to route SMTP mail. For the life of me I can not figure out why this server is allowing SMTP mail to relay. I have the option Do not reroute incoming SMTP mail checked. I have restarted the IMS a few times. But when I telnet and send an email to a hotmail address, I do not get an error stating relaying is denied. It sends the message through. Is there anything that I am missing that is allowing mail to relay? *This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Stainsafe Inc. or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.* _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Stainsafe Inc. or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.* _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
RE: Strange Outlook problem
Check your junk mail filters -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA;AIIM.ORG] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange Outlook problem I have a strange problem with Outlook 2000. Whenever I receive any message with the words Purchase order today in the body of the email, it automatically goes from my Inbox into my Deleted Items folder. I reviewed my rules and it didn't match any of my rules. Furthermore, I disabled all the rules and it still moves it into the Deleted Items folder. Any ideas ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 55 error user trying to login
Check the users alias in Exchange Admin; also Q173470 might help. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA 55 error user trying to login Q' I changed a users User ID: say from: Jsparticus to... Jspartic I reassigned the exchange account to the new user ID and it is OK when the user log's in from a regular workstation... but OWA gives OWA was unable to get to your inbox. any ideas? The new user ID is in all the same groups as the old user ID, same rights etc.. Actually I did the COPY in user manager for domainswhen I made the new account ID. Then I just went into Exchange Admin and changed the primary NT account to the new ID... Note: Exchange 55sp4, OWA 55sp4 on its own server IIS4 patched, NT4 domain NT4sp6a All other OWA accounts work fine...I knows it's just some trick Im missing..but Im missing it... Clue's? thanks Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly I haven't seen it yet either and I can't find anything on it yet. Anyone have any info on it, (is it an attachment)?? I haven't seen any yet either, but Messagelabs already has it in 3rd place behind Klez and Yaha, so they are out there. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly Same here; none yet. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly No sign of it yet on any of our customers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: John Q Jr. Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 14:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly Anyone getting hit with this. Sophos sent a high alert warning of a unprecedented distribution. I have not been alerted to one infected message yet. Just curious. - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ABV? in OL2K-OK2k2 in contacts presented differently
One thing you can do is move the fax number ~ that will remove the duplicate entry for him. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ABV? in OL2K-OK2k2 in contacts presented differently Because..there is too much info, the name and smtp address run together and since the window is so small he cant seem to figure out which one is FAX and SMTP...I must admit it's kind'a lame/hard to read in all... it really could use a tweak of course I guess id have to finish reading tom rizzo's book and know what i'm doing better... I'm guessing it is a product diff myself just have not had time to load up OL2K2 on other term...so on... Training...who's kidding who ;-)...but Id love the knowledge...the paper I can do without...the dog is house trained so they do not the need paper.. thanks bill -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 8:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ABV? in OL2K-OK2k2 in contacts presented differently Why is he bugging out because the columns are switched? He's still got the same info there, right? Tell him it's by design. Sounds like a product difference and it's not a real problem, so there's no real solution. If he thinks it's a real problem, tell him you *might* be able to fix it if you get the proper training. If he agrees to get you training, sign up for a bunch of Cisco courses and work on your CCIE... (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ABV? in OL2K-OK2k2 in contacts presented differently Ok have a Q on the way the Contacts looks/presented when selecting a recipient in OL2k vs. OL2K2 I think I understand that this is determined from the exchange server (though Im not positive or clear on it) and it is different between OL2K and OL2K2 on the same server In OL2K: a user starts to compose a new message, they click TO, the SELECT NAME box comes up, they change from the GAL to their CONTACTS. OK now it list all their contacts in order:. Persons name(Email, fax), FAX/SMTP/MAPIDL, SMTP Address of person select the person and off you go.. OK but now with a user with OL2K2 a user starts to compose a new message, they click TO, the SELECT NAME box comes up, the change from the GAL to their CONTACTS. OK now it list all their contacts in order:. Persons name(Email, fax), SMTP Address of person, FAX/SMTP/MAPIDL OL2K2 seems to have swapped position of the SMTP address and the FAX/SMTP/MAPIDL columns. Why? can I change it to be the same as OL2K?? is this determined via ABV? Why? I have my CEO buggin me about this cause he's not in montauk right now ;-) any feed back will be appreciated P.S. I looked at the FAQ which basically seem to say ABV is very invloved and not covered hereplease refer to your car's owners manual thank you ;-) Sys. det: Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a OL2K sp2 OL2K2 (only one person) thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MSExchangeIS Unknown Error
Do you have file level AV on your Exchange server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 10:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MSExchangeIS Unknown Error still im experiencing this problem, i searched on the MS site but found nothing related. when i turned on dignostic logging another warning event log with this message Unexpected error 0x8004010f occured in EcVirusScanOneMessage. we're using symantec AV version 2.5 i searched on the symantec site and found related article but its only for their AV Version 3.0. and there's a reccomendation that it need to run the isinteg -s your netbios server name here -fix -test alltests to fix the IS. im worried that it could damage the IS if i run this command and may result more complicated problem. is it safe to run this command? Thanks! jojo -Original Message- From: Jojo Solis Sent: Friday, 16 August 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MSExchangeIS Unknown Error Dear all, Has anyone here see this kind of application event log in your E2K Server? It's generated every 3 seconds, I'm worried that there's something wrong in my server especially the IS. Event ID: 12002 Source :MSExchangeIS Category: Conent Engine Description: error 80004010f-8000 occurred while processing message from arenesangre. Please help Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Copy Outlook rules
You do have antivirus, right? -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Copy Outlook rules Is there a way in Outlook to copy a rule and send it to someone else. I have a rule created to delete KLEZ virus email and I would like all my users to be able to install it in their Rulebase. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... sh ould client antivirus be installed as well?
If your Exchange server also serves as a file server, you'll want both types of AV. And you'll want to exclude everything Exchange on the file level scanner. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 7:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... sh ould client antivirus be installed as well? Some would disagree. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 6:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... should client antivirus be installed as well? No. Only install an Exchange-aware/compliant AV software. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jason Brown Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 18:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... should client antivirus be installed as well? We currently have Trend Scanmail 6.0 installed on our Exchange 2000 server, but this software doesn't scan the drives. Is there really a need for client antirus software? I'm concerned about having 2 antivirus programs running together on the same box. Performance is a concern as well. Any suggestions? TIA! -Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPYWARE called WINWHATWHERE is not detected by ANTI-VIRUS
You have to enter the extensions to block under Scan Policy ~ blocking. -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPYWARE called WINWHATWHERE is not detected by ANTI-VIRUS Yep got that but how do I configure the gateway to stop all .exe's .. not just scan and deliver.. but to quarantine them all -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 5:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPYWARE called WINWHATWHERE is not detected by ANTI-VIRUS If you have NAVCE, the Gateway product will block attachments -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPYWARE called WINWHATWHERE is not detected by ANTI-VIRUS I have Norton anti-virus for exchange installed... I can send you the email and chances are .. your mail server will pass on the attachment to you.. Norton for exchange is only scanning attachments and delviers the mails... it is nto able to quarantine all attachmentsI would like to quarantine all attachments.. is there some setting on the exchange that will allow me to quarantine the attachments and deliver the mail... and I can then check the attachments and forward them to the proper reciepient later on -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPYWARE called WINWHATWHERE is not detected by ANTI-VIRUS You should have been blocking this stuff at the Exchange server. Chances are it came as a .EXE file. .EXE is definitely one of the top 10 file types you should be blocking. Winwhatwhere is a legitimate program, so AV on the desktop is not the correct tool to stop it. It never should have made it in to your network in the first place. -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 6:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPYWARE called WINWHATWHERE is not detected by ANTI-VIRUS Dear All, Has anyone come across a spyware called winwhatwhere it was mailed to a user here and he opened it... It was programmed to capture the keystrokes for all passwords... and e-mailed as an attachment... Is there any reputable anti-virus that can actually detect such malicious spywares ... we have norton for exchange, and desktops and file and prin servers... it failed to detect it... furthermore when contacted we were informed that since it is a spyware... norton is designed to ignore such programmed.. like SPYWARE.. since it doesnt want the unsuspecting users to panic unneccessarily I did read about a software called bodetect that claims to stop this kind of programme and infact zonealarm informs the user ... anytime that this winwhatwhere attemtps to connect to the hotmail server on port 25 to stealthly send the email attachment and inform that a programmed was attempting to make an outgoing connection on port 25... .. but other than this personal firewall... are you folks aware of any software that can actually detect all spywares In case any one of you is interested.. just go to www.winwhatwhere.com regards _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch
RE: Win32/Klez.H.Worm
How do you block .exe's? -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Win32/Klez.H.Worm Exchange5.5 NT4 We have been getting a lot of the Win32/Klez.H.Worm virus and I think they are coming in with attachment extension html. How can I block this extension from coming in? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win32/Klez.H.Worm
right. So he would block .html the same way ~ by entering the extension to block. That is, if he does block .exe's. Which is what I asked him. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win32/Klez.H.Worm With your anti-virus software. -Peter -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 16:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win32/Klez.H.Worm How do you block .exe's? -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Win32/Klez.H.Worm Exchange5.5 NT4 We have been getting a lot of the Win32/Klez.H.Worm virus and I think they are coming in with attachment extension html. How can I block this extension from coming in? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win32/Klez.H.Worm
don't tell all your secrets, Mongo -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win32/Klez.H.Worm Mongo wrap server in foil. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win32/Klez.H.Worm How do you block .exe's? -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Win32/Klez.H.Worm Exchange5.5 NT4 We have been getting a lot of the Win32/Klez.H.Worm virus and I think they are coming in with attachment extension html. How can I block this extension from coming in? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win32/Klez.H.Worm
Don't forget your golden lasso ;) -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win32/Klez.H.Worm with my wonder woman bullet proof bracelets... -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win32/Klez.H.Worm How do you block .exe's? -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Win32/Klez.H.Worm Exchange5.5 NT4 We have been getting a lot of the Win32/Klez.H.Worm virus and I think they are coming in with attachment extension html. How can I block this extension from coming in? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K Memory Errors
Did you search TechNet? There were three hits on 9582: Q296073 Q314736 Q319682 -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K Memory Errors If I did not see this with my own two eyes, I would not believe it! Any one else ever see this error? Source: MSExchnageIS Event ID: 9582 The virtual memory necessary to run your Exchange server is fragmented in such a way that normal operation may begin to fail. It is highly recommended that you restart all Exchange services to correct this issue. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentrendirect.asp System is E2K SP2 on Win 2 K server 1024 MB RAM swap file = 1.5GB _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: One more question and I'm done for the day
So you looked at Q165017? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: One more question and I'm done for the day Weeding through these event Ids is starting to hurt my eyes. Take a gander at this. Microsoft KB doesn't tell me anything? Show me the money! Thanks. Event ID: 9307 @ 9302 9302 The transport configuration type 1 for the directory entry CN=MICROSOFT MTA,CN=SERVER,CN=SERVERS,CN=COLUMBUS,CN=ADMINISTRATIVE GROUPS,CN=GSW COMPANY DIRECTORY,CN=MICROSOFT EXCHANGE,CN=SERVICES,CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=DOMAIN,DC=TLD is not one of the supported values. Reconfigure the transport configuration type in the identified directory entry. [BASE IL OPERATOR 42 217] (8) 9307 (BASE IL OPERATOR(42) Proc 221) Address Registration failed for transport type : 1 (8) For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Authentication issues
Try opening Outlook with logon network security to none. If that helps, try setting encryption to when using the network. -Original Message- From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Authentication issues We have an E2K SP1 active/passive cluster running on W2K SP2 with approximately 700 users in a single store. We have a front-end/back-end scenario. Clients run W95/98/W2K and Outlook 98/2000/2002. Gradually over the last couple of weeks, we have been getting more and more users complaining that they can't get into Outlook the first time they open it. They get network problems are preventing connection with exchange If they try again, they can usually get in. It doesn't seem to matter if the user is on the same 100mb switch as the mailserver or on a t1 wan connection. No changes have been made to the mail servers - front or back end. There is nothing in the event log. The server utilization looks normal. We aren't having any other authentication or name resolution issues with other applications. We've changed our firewall within the last month to ISA from Raptor and a server for instant messaging. These are the only changes. Any ideas what could be causing the error? Is there something else I can monitor? Tara _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Sever Impact
Did you do any research on the virus? From Symantec's site: The From address is randomly-chosen from email addresses that the worm finds on the infected computer. That's why. -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 8:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: WORM_KLEZ.G Sever Impact Hi All This virus, although being detected and stripped off, still causes an enormous amount of email traffic. I currently receive about 50 to 60 warnings per hour. Is there anything one can do proactively here, no, I don't mean pull out the network cable:-) or should I just sit out the storm until other administrator have patched their servers. I'm also getting calls from other administrator saying I'm sending the virus to them, but the user accounts they say send these emails have nothing in there send items, nor do I have and records in my logs, which leads me to believe this little virus is spoofing email addresses. Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Question
It's the Klez virus. Also from Symantec's site: If the message is opened in an unpatched version of Microsoft Outlook or Outlook Express, the attachment may be automatically executed. Information about this vulnerability and a patch are available at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS01-020.asp Are those machines patched? -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question The user isn't trying to open it. They have preview pane and it automatically tries to download something. They did not open anything. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 5:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question Better question. Why is the user trying to open this at all?? -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Question Okay, a user of mine received a message from another user with the title below. Hi,Bbarrow,japanese girl VS playboy It automatically tries to download something, but it says the site doesn't work. Has anyone heard of this, and if so what kind of virus is it. Chris Callan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Question
Never mind. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question We dont need no stinkin patches. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question It's the Klez virus. Also from Symantec's site: If the message is opened in an unpatched version of Microsoft Outlook or Outlook Express, the attachment may be automatically executed. Information about this vulnerability and a patch are available at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS01-020.asp Are those machines patched? -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question The user isn't trying to open it. They have preview pane and it automatically tries to download something. They did not open anything. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 5:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question Better question. Why is the user trying to open this at all?? -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Question Okay, a user of mine received a message from another user with the title below. Hi,Bbarrow,japanese girl VS playboy It automatically tries to download something, but it says the site doesn't work. Has anyone heard of this, and if so what kind of virus is it. Chris Callan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Question
Don't -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question Of course you do! :0 -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question Never mind. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question We dont need no stinkin patches. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question It's the Klez virus. Also from Symantec's site: If the message is opened in an unpatched version of Microsoft Outlook or Outlook Express, the attachment may be automatically executed. Information about this vulnerability and a patch are available at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS01-020.asp Are those machines patched? -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question The user isn't trying to open it. They have preview pane and it automatically tries to download something. They did not open anything. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 5:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question Better question. Why is the user trying to open this at all?? -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Question Okay, a user of mine received a message from another user with the title below. Hi,Bbarrow,japanese girl VS playboy It automatically tries to download something, but it says the site doesn't work. Has anyone heard of this, and if so what kind of virus is it. Chris Callan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email
RE: WORM_KLEZ.G
A new version of the GW; you might be alright, but I'm at .13, and the tech is e-mailing me link to the updated version. What's really funny is I just got new CD's the other day and they have the same version. Have you been stopping it? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G A new version of NAV-GW, or a new definition file? Using NAV-GW 2.5.1.18 here. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:31 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: WORM_KLEZ.G Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G If you're using NAV for Gateways to do the blocking, it doesn't recognize the attachments; they have a new version that corrects this. -Original Message- From: Mood, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Block extension .PIF, .SCR, .EXE or .BAT. at a bare minimum. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: WORM_KLEZ.G DOES ANYONE KNOW OF THE BEST WAY TO BLOCK THIS VIRUS WORM_KLEZ.G RICH _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WORM_KLEZ.G
Tom, The new version is 2.5.2.9 (for NT) -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G A new version of the GW; you might be alright, but I'm at .13, and the tech is e-mailing me link to the updated version. What's really funny is I just got new CD's the other day and they have the same version. Have you been stopping it? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G A new version of NAV-GW, or a new definition file? Using NAV-GW 2.5.1.18 here. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:31 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: WORM_KLEZ.G Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G If you're using NAV for Gateways to do the blocking, it doesn't recognize the attachments; they have a new version that corrects this. -Original Message- From: Mood, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Block extension .PIF, .SCR, .EXE or .BAT. at a bare minimum. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: WORM_KLEZ.G DOES ANYONE KNOW OF THE BEST WAY TO BLOCK THIS VIRUS WORM_KLEZ.G RICH _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: email messages slow to open?
Jesse, The way to test this is to disable real time protection on the clients and see if it speeds up; then disable it on the server and test it. I have been having a problem with NAV Exchange since 1/28. Also check the program files, common, Symantec shared, virus def file for *.tmp files. Good luck. Candee -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: email messages slow to open? Yes, NAV on the client PC is set to scan Outlook attachments. But we've had this stup that way for over a year and it's never been slow. It's just recently when I've noticed this. Is it configured to scan your Outlook mailbox? -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: email messages slow to open? We are using NAV corporate edition 7.5 on our desktops. But I do not have NAV for Exchange on the Exchange server itself. Are you using NAV MSE? -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: email messages slow to open? Anyone know where I should begin looking to determine whether I am experiencing the beginnings of a problem or whether this is just normal? Lately I've noticed that when I open email messages in Outlook XP they take longer to open. Especially the big messages (from listservs and such). May take like 2 minutes to open the email and task manager on my system (Windows NT) shows outlook.exe taking up 99% cpu time. These messages do not have attachments, I'm just talking about regular messages. I have an Exchange 5.5/SP4 box. I haven't noticed anything on the Exchange servers performance reports that show a sudden increase in CPU/memory/HD activity. This just sorta happened about 2 weeks ago. NO changes have been made on the server in quite some time. Any idea what this might be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving m e nu ts!
Have you installed the security patch for Outlook 2000? Q259228 Q296065 -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 7:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving m e nu ts! This is for 2002 - Tried it in 2000 and no luck! Have you tried it with 2000? Bye -Original Message- From: Horst Hinz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 6 February 2002 10:20AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving m e nu ts! I found the article, follow the registry edit instructions in Q290497. -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving m e nu ts! OK have got to step 9 of the instruction on the page listed bellow Under WHEN POSTING FROM THIS FOLDER, USE, choose Outlook Security Form... Well - I CAN'T -- It is Greyed out!!! Why! Bye -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 6 February 2002 8:21AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving m e nu ts! You must need the Outlook security update over-ride..! What you need to do is download the admin pack for Exchange 5.5, set it up. After that it creates an Outlook Security Settings public folder. Then you(if u r da admin) will need to navigate to this folder and post using the default form. There you can set over-ride setting on an individual user basis.. For more info and all da grimmy details check this.. http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup/admin.htm Good luck ~John -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving m e nu ts! That is not a problem, but a security feature. -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving me nu ts! Hi All, I have an outlook 2000 workstation that is blocking all exe files and other nasty extensions I need to turn this OFF! I can find no option to turn this off under the setting in outlook - nor can I find anything useful in TechNet... Any Ideas? Thanks Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 Disclaimer: The information in this message or attachments (if any) may be confidential or legally privileged material. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and associated material from any computer. Any views expressed in this communication are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be views of CONNECT Credit Union. Whilst virus-scanning software is utilised by CONNECT, no responsibility is taken for virus damage that may originate from this transmission. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Disclaimer: The information in this message or attachments (if any) may be confidential or legally privileged material. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and
RE: Some Problem Someplace, I think
Do you use Outlook? -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Some Problem Someplace, I think hi list.. i have a problem with either the server or the client.. how do i fix it..? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig
ROTFMAOWTRDMC :) Candee MOS+UN -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Don't pick on women. We run off and cry. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:47 PM Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Sorry, I thought she was a male. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Mike, If you want to disrespect me, that's fine. Bring it on. I've got your LART right here pal. But you'd be well advised to treat a lady, such as Mrs. Hunter with proper deference. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig That's funny seeing how you are commenting on this. It looks as if you have been called everything already. I'm sorry did I hurt your feelings? -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Mike, friendly advice. Do yourself a big favor and read the list for a few weeks before you decide who is a smartass, a wiseass, a dickhead, a moron, a troll, a goddess, etc. Some of the people you may define as smartass, the rest of us might define as guru with an edge. I'll take the edge as long as I get the guru knowledge along with it. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Not long. I actually joined to get some useful information and aslo give some. I didn't join to compete with certain people on right answers. Michael Woodruff System Administrator inChord Communications Inc. A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility 614.543.6405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Mike, exactly how long have you been on the list? Tom. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig This guy sure is a smart ass. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Hmmm. I think I covered that in my review of Antigen 6.0. ;) Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig You can use the Sophos engine with Antigen. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Chris Scharff| || chris_scharff@messageone| || .com| || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/14/2001 11:22 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- - -- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc:
RE: excel attachment could not be found
Open Excel, under tools, options - general. Uncheck Ignore other applications Good luck. Candee MOS+UN -Original Message- From: Kiran, Murat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: excel attachment could not be found Brothers and Sisters, IOne of my manager has the following problem: When he recieves a message with excel attachment. He tries to open excel file and he gets : file can not be found error. He then save the file as.and then opens it from his pc or network share.it rules. He doesnt has the same problem with other attachments (word etc). From another pc it goes also good. is this a local office installation problem or?I installed office already again. but stillno solution. is thera another thing that i dont see. exchange 5.5 with outlook 98 client. gr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: excel attachment could not be found
Depends ;) Candee MOS+UN -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: excel attachment could not be found Good Luck? Are you implying that Excel is more art than science? ;) -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: excel attachment could not be found Open Excel, under tools, options - general. Uncheck Ignore other applications Good luck. Candee MOS+UN -Original Message- From: Kiran, Murat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: excel attachment could not be found Brothers and Sisters, IOne of my manager has the following problem: When he recieves a message with excel attachment. He tries to open excel file and he gets : file can not be found error. He then save the file as.and then opens it from his pc or network share.it rules. He doesnt has the same problem with other attachments (word etc). From another pc it goes also good. is this a local office installation problem or?I installed office already again. but stillno solution. is thera another thing that i dont see. exchange 5.5 with outlook 98 client. gr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: www.slipstick.com/
Funny. Opens right up for me. =) Candee MOS+UN -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: www.slipstick.com/ Argle.. Bottom line, if the site is down, its down.. SHEESH! -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: www.slipstick.com/ :) nope -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: 01 November 2001 10:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: www.slipstick.com/ Or maybe *your* firewall blocks ICMP... -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: re: www.slipstick.com/ -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] looks like the site is down :(altho' there could be an ICMP block on it E. C:\ping www.slipstick.com Pinging www.slipstick.com [64.78.37.149] with 32 bytes of data: Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Ping statistics for 64.78.37.149: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms Sent: 01 November 2001 18:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Categories ERROR The requested URL could not be retrieved While trying to retrieve the URL: http://www.slipstick.com/ The following error was encountered: Connection Failed The system returned: (146) Connection refused The remote host or network may be down. Please try the request again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Outlook Categories www.slipstick.com -- Drew _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: www.slipstick.com/
C'mon Andy; you know I couldn't make you look bad... You do that all by yourself... :) Besides, you are bad ;) Candee MOS+UN -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: www.slipstick.com/ Oh sure Candee, just make me look bad ;) -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: www.slipstick.com/ Funny. Opens right up for me. =) Candee MOS+UN -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: www.slipstick.com/ Argle.. Bottom line, if the site is down, its down.. SHEESH! -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: www.slipstick.com/ :) nope -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: 01 November 2001 10:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: www.slipstick.com/ Or maybe *your* firewall blocks ICMP... -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: re: www.slipstick.com/ -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] looks like the site is down :(altho' there could be an ICMP block on it E. C:\ping www.slipstick.com Pinging www.slipstick.com [64.78.37.149] with 32 bytes of data: Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Ping statistics for 64.78.37.149: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms Sent: 01 November 2001 18:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Categories ERROR The requested URL could not be retrieved While trying to retrieve the URL: http://www.slipstick.com/ The following error was encountered: Connection Failed The system returned: (146) Connection refused The remote host or network may be down. Please try the request again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Outlook Categories www.slipstick.com -- Drew _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mad at My Exchange Server
Don't be silly, Andy. *It seemed like a good idea at the time.* G Candee MOS+UN -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mad at My Exchange Server turn it off? You mean set it to 0? Why? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mad at My Exchange Server I had that on for a few days then I turn it off. Deleted items retention. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mad at My Exchange Server Go to Recover Deleted Items in Outlook Whats your DIR time set to? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mad at My Exchange Server I cannot find where my users deleted items are and it still shows that there is 256,000 k in the Private information store under the deleted items K column. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
Oh, I'm all over the place ;) I get around. Candee -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 7:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Are you on the right list? ;) Andy -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Fish: It's what's for dinner Candee -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Fish: The Forbidden Taco. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Beer Good. Taco Good. Lambada Bad. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 03:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Does anyone know where MEC is this year? Anyone, anyone? Of course if lots of people are canceling, that just means more beer and fish tacos for Andy. Doug Hampshire Iron Chef Hanji -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. They told him they would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of people have been canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard anything yet . . . - Original Message - From: Crumbaker, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM Subject: RE: MEC Yes. Still on. Here is what I got from them: September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible tragedy. As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders urged that the business and economic activities of this nation and the global economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy. The reopening of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic activities of our nation. After long consideration, we have decided to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 30th through October 4th as scheduled. Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we strongly believe that national and international air transportation, hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the MEC 2001 conference opens. All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions and special events will take place as scheduled. We are working closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible security measure is in place. All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our lives full of pride in our values and our country. Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sincerely, The MEC 2001 Team Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: MEC
I am also a bit of a mind reader Candee -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC You said that, not us -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Candee Vaglica Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 6:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I get around. Candee -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 7:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Are you on the right list? ;) Andy -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Fish: It's what's for dinner Candee -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Fish: The Forbidden Taco. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Beer Good. Taco Good. Lambada Bad. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 03:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Does anyone know where MEC is this year? Anyone, anyone? Of course if lots of people are canceling, that just means more beer and fish tacos for Andy. Doug Hampshire Iron Chef Hanji -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. They told him they would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of people have been canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard anything yet . . . - Original Message - From: Crumbaker, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM Subject: RE: MEC Yes. Still on. Here is what I got from them: September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible tragedy. As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders urged that the business and economic activities of this nation and the global economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy. The reopening of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic activities of our nation. After long consideration, we have decided to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 30th through October 4th as scheduled. Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we strongly believe that national and international air transportation, hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the MEC 2001 conference opens. All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions and special events will take place as scheduled. We are working closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible security measure is in place. All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our lives full of pride in our values and our country. Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sincerely, The MEC 2001 Team Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto
RE: MEC
Haven't we had this conversation already? Candee -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC What am I thinking? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Candee Vaglica Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I am also a bit of a mind reader Candee -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC You said that, not us -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Candee Vaglica Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 6:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I get around. Candee -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 7:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Are you on the right list? ;) Andy -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Fish: It's what's for dinner Candee -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Fish: The Forbidden Taco. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Beer Good. Taco Good. Lambada Bad. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 03:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Does anyone know where MEC is this year? Anyone, anyone? Of course if lots of people are canceling, that just means more beer and fish tacos for Andy. Doug Hampshire Iron Chef Hanji -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. They told him they would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of people have been canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard anything yet . . . - Original Message - From: Crumbaker, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM Subject: RE: MEC Yes. Still on. Here is what I got from them: September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible tragedy. As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders urged that the business and economic activities of this nation and the global economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy. The reopening of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic activities of our nation. After long consideration, we have decided to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 30th through October 4th as scheduled. Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we strongly believe that national and international air transportation, hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the MEC 2001 conference opens. All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions and special events will take place as scheduled. We are working closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible security measure is in place. All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our lives full of pride in our values and our country. Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sincerely, The MEC 2001 Team Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: MEC
Fish: It's what's for dinner Candee -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Fish: The Forbidden Taco. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Beer Good. Taco Good. Lambada Bad. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 03:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Does anyone know where MEC is this year? Anyone, anyone? Of course if lots of people are canceling, that just means more beer and fish tacos for Andy. Doug Hampshire Iron Chef Hanji -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. They told him they would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of people have been canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard anything yet . . . - Original Message - From: Crumbaker, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM Subject: RE: MEC Yes. Still on. Here is what I got from them: September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible tragedy. As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders urged that the business and economic activities of this nation and the global economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy. The reopening of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic activities of our nation. After long consideration, we have decided to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 30th through October 4th as scheduled. Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we strongly believe that national and international air transportation, hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the MEC 2001 conference opens. All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions and special events will take place as scheduled. We are working closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible security measure is in place. All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our lives full of pride in our values and our country. Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sincerely, The MEC 2001 Team Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
