Take a look at using Terminal Server or Citrix and leave the mail where it
belongs. On the Exchange server.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 4:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recommendations
That's because she's a minion of CJ.
A MOS +BP no less.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Pochedley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: God Bless America (way OT)
Michèle,
How did you know it was my uncle
If you need to keep the sent mail where everyone can read it bcc it to a PF
or the mailbox.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: responding from an exchange group
You
No you should send all porn to me so I can verify if it business applicable.
Ken,
The one thing you need to watch for when you quarantine the mail is that NAI
does not send it back through the scanning routine when you go to send it
on. I know of one person who was burned this way.
it is never scanned. Once it is released, then it is
scanned.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax:(360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz
This is a good start if you want to 100% stop any virus. You should also
turn disable any non-fixed drives on all you workstations and servers. Any
VPN connections should be terminated as well, just in case.
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
The same thing could be said of IBM a number of years back. They were all
about Big Iron and developing what they thought the customer wanted rather
than what the customer really needed.
I still see that attitude in mainframe shops that drives me nuts. For a long
while the mainframe was the only
] Recipient ok
354 Enter mail, end with . on a line by itself
250 Ok
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 12/4/2001 8:15 AM
Subject: RE: ORB UK - cross post - long
Chris,
When did you test and what did you do
I feel your pain.
http://openrbl.org/
Gives you multiple queries on one page to see who has you listed.
-Original Message-
From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spam listings
I asked John, who is the author of the RFC his opinion. Here is his
response.
-Original Message-
From: John C Klensin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 8:43 PM
To: Schwartz, Jim
Subject: Re: RFC2821
The answer, unfortunately, is yes
That would depend on the size and complexity of your environment, what types
of attachments that you need to allow into your company and how sensitive
your company is to downtime due to a virus outbreak. Many of the anti virus
vendors now have Consoles that can manage your deployments across
Check the shoulder boards. That bird on my shoulder doesn't mean I'm a
pirate.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?
Motivated, Dedicated and True to the Anti-Virus Role
No, he is looking to increase his empire. Let him hire another admin and
then use him for your own purposes when he's not working on AV. Within 6
months you'll have yourself a minion.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001
I say bully for him and that you feel that all the Unix/Linux sites are
devoted to hackers and people that waste their time so you're going to block
e-mails from sun.com etc. etc.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:34
Richard, I would suggest that you or someone else in your company look into
ASE training.
http://www.compaq.com/certification/na/
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Fred, if you're new to Exchange and are unsure about what will happen or
exactly what you should do. Call PSS.
-Original Message-
From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ESE98 ?
Are you suffering from Multiple Personality Disorder or are you responding
to your own questions?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems Logging on to domain.
You too?
Well, do you have a backup?
Yes, but we don't know where the tapes are.
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 5:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Thought
Good friggen luck.
It took me a month to get off the last of them. Some of the administrators
of the blackhole lists are totally unresponsive.
http://www.openrbl.org/ is a good lookup source. It lets you check a number
of sites at once.
-Original Message-
From: Dustin Krysak
Amen. The other consideration you should look at is will you filter e-mails
that are really business related, but for whatever reason appear to be spam.
This blocks legitimate mail and could possibly lose you business. Example:
Dear Sirs,
My name is Dick Cheney and I am the President of a 18
This, along with your last question about scanning e-mail, leads me to
believe that your boss is an e-mail Nazi. He wants to know what everyone is
sending and receiving to anyone. Refer him to Ed Crowley's statement, There
are seldom good technical solutions for behavioral problems.
: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend e-manager opinions/caveats/complexity?
Amen. The other consideration you should look at is will you
filter e-mails
that are really business related
Something like:
Congratulations!!! You've been selected by our steering committee to handle
our AD design and implementation. Our selection was not based just on the
$$$'s you will save us, but due to your experience and understanding. We
look forward to working with you.
(Still can't figure
The key word there is, supposed. Best bet is to have some sort of forwarding
set up on the old IP address. Some ISP's update their DNS when the Unix
admin wants to take a break from figuring out if he should put the / in
front of the capital S or behind a lower case b.
-Original
Let's see.
1000 user per box. 800MB RAM. No issues here. So I should more than double
my RAM and halve the number of users per box.
And I thought I over engineered servers.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:52 AM
Sean, I don't think you saw Andy's sarcasm tags. Maybe the thong he's
wearing distracted you.
On everything else you said I agree.
-Original Message-
From: McGilligan, Sean [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
You should look into version control software for better control. It will
also help to cut down on the amount of data you store. One copy vs many
copies of a document. It will also help you track who checked out and made
changes to docs and allow you to revert back quickly to older versions if
We took a look at the e500 appliance. It seemed pretty good. High speed, low
drag. Then we saw the price tag and sent it back.
-Original Message-
From: Boehm, Diane M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hate to beat a dead
Just be glad that neither of them write documentation for your environment.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hyche [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: My Salary(exchange)
Gee, Ya'll sure do talk good.
Obviously you've gone blind from reading Chris Scharff's comment about
wearing a pink sun dress, but when you recover enough of your site you can
look at:
http://www.internic.net
-Original Message-
From: Brett Wesoloski [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:13 PM
We looked at it for a little bit. High speed, low drag. It's really a
network appliance running on a Linux kernel that does the same thing that
WebShield does. Supposedly rated for 100k messages per hour. We didn't get
too far into it as the price tag was bit large. My biggest complaint about
The monitoring solution that they are pushing here has a requirement to add
MDAC (v 2.1.2 or higher) to the Exchange (5.5 - SP4) servers in order for
the agent to work properly. Has anyone else installed MDAC or is anyone
aware of any information of why this is a bad idea? My largest concern is
. See Knowledge Base article Q271908 for more information.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thu 3/14/2002 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: MDAC on Exchange
a there preference push or a mandatory push? There are
monitoring solutions available that do not require agents.
Dave Cook
Exchange Administrator
Kutak Rock, LLP
402-231-8352
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8
is 2.5. Exchange 5.5 Sp4 runs fine
on Windows 2000. I would assume that it would work just fine. However
all precautions should be taken.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
the weekend.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MDAC on Exchange
Excuse me but I should clarify something. The MDAX they would like to
install is 2.1.2 or higher. They've also
an application that requires MDAC2.6 or later to go on our NT4
servers. [it's the Bindview Migration re-permissioning agent btw)
I'll probably check it out next week if you can wait.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 March 2002 18:53
To: Exchange
300? Small potatoes. Your IMS will always have a few messages sitting in it
from NDR's, and bounces. You can also adjust the time out values to get rid
of them faster if you like or change the retry rate if that makes you happy.
If I see an outbound queue that is totally empty, then I get worried
I get the ones about holding my...
Never mind.
I used to get them for a while and found that some emails were not getting
to us in a timely manner and then I would get the nasty gram. Look into your
inbound mail and check connections. Do some testing to see if you can
connect via SMTP regularly.
Compaq has a utility called Meatgrinder. They don't let anyone have it of
course, unless you're a Compaq engineer. (Or they accidentally leave the
executable on the server they are testing). See if Dell has a similar one.
It lets you stress any part of the system from the CPU to the drives.
I'll use the same argument Doug used for the BCC question.
How did you prevent someone from taking a typed memo and making photocopies
of it?
-Original Message-
From: Bibel, Laura Y. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
.
Since you work for a bank, Im betting that you guys still
type out memos.
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:16:30 -0400
From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message.
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED
message.
Since you work for a bank, Im betting that you guys still
type out memos.
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:16:30 -0400
From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message.
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
The Olds still in the shop?
Jim, check the archives. This topic has been hammered to death. Short answer
is, have you management set the business requirement of how large they need
to get and design to that.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
What about a workflow/compliance application? For example, a message is sent
by user A to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The message needs to be checked for
compliance to state/federal laws. (i.e. can't say guarantee when talking
about investments) The compliance officer then needs to pass the message
along
-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I need to send emails as another
What about a workflow/compliance application? For example, a
message is sent
by user A to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The message needs
Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I need to send emails as another
OK.
A Dr. wants to send medical records to the CDC or other informational
gathering body. The e-mail needs
Mongo S.O.L.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messed up PST
Mongo no backup pst.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
For a minute I thought they finally made a movie about me.
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question
Poop. J. C., not J. S..
-Original
Basically it means you're waiting on AD to give Exchange the location of the
mail server the mailbox resides on or what action to do with the mail. It's
waiting on a response from AD.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 11:25
Wrong side of The Pond...
-Original Message-
From: Clark, John A (FUSA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Attack ??
Did someone wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning??? YIKES!!
-Original
OK. Make it so.
I have like 30 domains that we accept mail for. Please give some more
details on EXACTLY what you want to accomplish and we can try to help you
out. Otherwise we're guessing or making stuff up. Some people on this list
have very vivid imaginations and you wouldn't want that.
If your management likes Gartner reports, they suggest that the must move
off 5.5 date to be 2Q04.
When you think about non-support, you should also factor in that more and
more technical folks are moving to E2K. The list of people that can run a
5.5 organization is going to get shorter and
I'll have you know that I've obtained the rank of Degenerate, 1st Class.
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
BTW- I think most of you guys are a bunch of perverts, in
I guess the point of it would be YMMV. Depending on your traffic patterns,
your need to regulate traffic between sites by size and or times or to
throttle the connection. With E2K you put in your best guess and if it's not
what you need, it's not that hard to change it. We have two main data
Two reasons possible.
An orphaned object still exists for that address in the DL that they are
sending to or one of the users still has the user listed as a delegate.
-Original Message-
From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange
Depends on the version of Outlook. Back level clients will query the E2K
server which uses DSproxy services to do the lookup for the client. Outlook
2000 and XP are given a nearby GC server to do it's own lookups.
-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
/2002 (98 2000 in CW mode only).
Siegfried /
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: LDAP in Exchange 2000
Depends on the version of Outlook. Back level clients will query the
E2K
Bankers! g
The SMTP address should be unique and you may be able to code the web app to
get that information, but it's a lot of work in place of having the user do
it themselves.
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:44 AM
To:
Yes, but the server installs the application so fast that I don't have time
to read it.
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Installing Exchange Admin on .net server
There's
Brackets around the rcpt to:
-Original Message-
From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 5:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP message
I am using Exchange Server 5.5
I am using an application that establishes an SMTP connection to my SMTP
server
Below inline.
-Original Message-
From: Lindsay Berry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP log analysis
Okay I need an opinion on exactly what is going on in this log file. Just a
fresh opinion to see if I'm just being
But will it warm the syrup for my waffles?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
But,but! The magazine on the plane said that the next
Yes, but IBM finds this compelling need to place an e on to everything for
some odd reason. I wonder how much the marketing genius got paid for coming
up with that idea.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:44 AM
To: Exchange
Translation for the reading impaired: leave it alone.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
My rigorous Exchange maintenance involves a beer and
Not to mention that some of the net nazi black hole lists will add your
domain because they hate HTML so much.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Adding some HTML to all
If it is offensive and you don't want users reading the item then ExMerge
will work. From Q260037:
If the original message was forwarded with a different subject, the ExMerge
utility cannot delete the message based on the original message subject line
or MTS-ID.
If the Item Retention option is
channel 89, that does not destroy the source. It might lead to a garbage
collection exercise that will cause a purge to occur, but deleting the views
is not deleting the data.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:37 PM
, see if that helps.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 21:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A mistake was made...
If it is offensive and you don't want users reading the item then ExMerge
will work. From Q260037
could recover from that... there's a difference :)
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 13:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A mistake was made...
You can still recover from that. Get a big magnet and go to town
hands Gary a cigar
-Original Message-
From: Clark, John A (FUSA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2002
It appears as though he needs a lot more than just a beer
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams
Limit the number of connections and limit the size of the mail. Connection
reset. Bye-bye.
If you're so concerned with not exposing your Exchange server directly to
the internet, then place a relay server behind your firewall to accept mail
from External sources and then pass the mail to your
on my network?
Wow
Don Ely - NMBOTWBAS and then some
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp
Limit the number of connections
: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail loop
OOO was disabled when I disabled forward to internet. Any more ideas? I
think the problem in on the receiving end.
Thanks,
Kelly
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Well, your TCO just went up by doing BLB. The cost for the extra tapes, the
lost time that the drives are backing up data that has already been backed
up when they could be backing up something else(opportunity costs) and staff
costs to restore and item that could have been undeleted by the user.
But you're a bank...
What about Tivoli?
Tries to keep a straight face
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Monitoring application for Exchange
Just swamped and the head honcho
You would need to add another layer to that. Block sender to recipient. One
mans UCE may be what someone else wants to see. It would be a pretty
intensive application to do those types of lookups. All you are doing at the
point is centralizing the delete junk mail rule that users may have set up.
Unless you would like to offload such things as gateway antivirus protection
and content screening. Those are good applications to put on relay servers
like you are talking about.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:02 PM
To:
Some mailers get ornery about sending to a domain without and MX record.
They expect to see and MX record and they should default to the A record if
the MX record is not available, but they don't always do it well.
Go Huskies!
-Original Message-
From: Sandhya Pai [mailto:[EMAIL
You can set that under a configuration setting in the System Attendant.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: message tracking logs
You should configure the message tracking log
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm 3.35
-Original Message-
From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Storage Limit warnings
Is there a way to customize the warnings that Exchange 5.5 sends
You pronounce it the same way it is spelled.
Kind of sounds like spitting out a watermelon seed. [1]
[1] Begging forgiveness from Kimmie for stealing her line.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:14 PM
To: Exchange
You forgot the quack.
There have been numerous discussions regarding content filtering and how it
works. Decide what you are willing to risk in lost mail, or additional
manpower resources versus what you are trying to accomplish. Then go find
the tool that meets those requirements.
Looking a
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Schwartz, Jim
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Content Filtering
You forgot the quack.
There have been numerous discussions regarding content filtering and how it
works. Decide what you are willing
Please include a copy of the NDR.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP to aol.com
What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can
send reliably
There is a fairly good white paper on this subject here:
http://www.ferris.com/
Look for White Paper: Email Archiving Records Management in the sponsored
research section. It also lists a number of vendors that can accommodate
your needs.
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil
Ah, yes. I recall that incident.
If you choose to use a RBL, read very carefully what the criteria is to be
placed on their lists. As Darcy said before, some of these folks block
entire netblocks. There is one or two that I know of that have blocked the
entire Sprintlink netblock. That's
For WinNT 4.0 in H-node - Q142309 Q119493 is a good article describing the
different node types.
NetBIOS name cache
WINS server - 3 queries 1.5 second timeout.
B-node broadcast - 3 broadcasts with 750ms timeout.
LMHOSTS file
HOSTS file
DNS server
I thought I read somewhere that Win2K reverses
Hello! [1]
Frankly. I run the mail system for a business. Decisions about who and what
arrives into my mail systems is BUSINESS decision. The folks who run the RBL
systems are technologists. They make TECHNOLOGY decisions. They have no idea
about my business needs so I would never allow them to
Many organizations see messaging as a transport system or a communication
system and fail to see the significant body of knowledge that is captured in
the e-mails. The problem arises with this data not being organized into
easily searchable information. Archival solutions are really a patch on top
To be kept in the life style that you wish to become accustomed to. g
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: somewhat OT
Who knows? I'd love to retire today. If I can only
Amen! You'd be surprised how many times that important document isn't
worth the $50.00 charge to their cost center.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sent Item
3. Ask the user
? Seems like it should be $50/hr or something
like that . . . With a minimum charge, of course!
James Winzenz, MCSE, A+
Associate Systems Administrator
InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:JSchwartz;BBandT.com]
Sent: Wednesday
Blind Carbon Copy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rrivera;elnuevodia.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How did I receive this?
I just received an email (and possibly others in my company) but it did not
have a 'To:'
There used to be a good white paper written by Compaq and Microsoft called
Managing and Monitoring Microsoft(r) Exchange Server. I can't find it on
either site anymore.
I'll send it to you offline if you would like.
-Original Message-
From: Marshall, Ben F. [mailto:ben.marshall;usaa.com]
Found it on Active Answers finally. You'll need to register on their site to
get it.
http://tinyurl.com/2p7g
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Performance Monitoring Question
The students are employed by the school so it's a business e-mail address
not the student one. They have every right to do what they want.
Yes, you can use the encapsulated x.400 address but in this case I don't
think anyone would make the effort to do that.
-Original Message-
From:
And you forget to bring beer.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 7:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
Seems like I'm always late to the party.
You're going to carve up the disks and share spindles with critcal servers
running high intensive databases?
snicker
Good luck.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the IBM Shark
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the IBM Shark
:p that could be solved with proper planning and good lun management.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 9
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
