Re: IMC not working - error 3051 also

2003-01-21 Thread Daniel Chenault
The message is not making it to the IMC; the MTA is puking. Look for other
events regarding the MTA or the IS complaining about the MTA.

- Original Message -
From: Pat Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 3:56 PM
Subject: IMC not working - error 3051 also


Howdy - been away from the Exchange world for a little while, now thrown
back into it.

Just looked at the email/file server for a small firm for the first
time. No Internet email is going in or out. Mail to others within the
office appears to be fine. But the Internet Mail Connector seems to be
broken. All services are starting fine, and attempts to send an outbound
internet email message (to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) yields the following in
the event log:

A non-delivery report (reason code unable-to-transfer and diagnostic
code unrecognised-OR-name) is being generated for message C=US;A=
;P=EMEK;L=EMEK01-030117191939Z-2. It was originally destined for C=US;A=
;P=EMEK;O=EMEK01;DDA:SMTP=reply(a)mydomain.com; (recipient number 1),
and was to be redirected to . [MTA DISP:RESULT 19 136] (12)

I'm also seeing the following:

Warning
MSExchangeIS Private
MTA Connections
2000
Verify that the Microsoft Exchange MTA service has started. Consecutive
ma-open calls are failing with error 3051.

Anyone see this before?

It's a simple little accounting shop with about a dozen users who are
heading into tax season. I'd greatly appreciate any assistance.

Thanks!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Free Mailing List Software

2003-01-21 Thread Daniel Chenault
Nope, I wanted to develop a good solution that I could sell.

- Original Message - 
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software


 What, you wanted to give away software that was free?
 
 On 1/17/03 8:26, Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
 Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this. 
 
 -Original Message- 
 From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM 
 To: Exchange Discussions 
 Subject: Free Mailing List Software 
 Sensitivity: Private 
 
 
 Hello 
 
 Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software package for MS 
 Exchange Server 5.5 
 
 Thanks in advance 
 
 Nik 
 
 _ 
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 _ 
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Free Mailing List Software

2003-01-17 Thread Daniel Chenault
Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this.

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Free Mailing List Software
Sensitivity: Private


Hello

Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software package for MS
Exchange Server 5.5

Thanks in advance

Nik

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: The SEC is killing me.

2003-01-15 Thread Daniel Chenault
Just have a 90-day backup tape retention policy.

- Original Message -
From: Clemens, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:05 PM
Subject: The SEC is killing me.


 Mixed Exchange 5.5 SP4 / Exchange 2000 SP3
 100% Active Directory
 100% Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4

 Our Legal and Security department wants us to provide the ability to
access
 every e-mail the company sends or receives for a period of 90 days to
 satisfy certain SEC requirements.

 The original plan was to Journal everything into a mailbox using an
Exchange
 5.5 server.  It worked in so far as all the mail went to the
 mailbox...but...After it got over 100 messages outlook didn't do a
very
 good job searching it.

 So we moved the Journal to Exchange 2000 and are Indexing it.  With 50
 messages so far Outlook searches it pretty fast.  So far so good.

 I guess my questions iswhat is everyone else out there doing to
satisfy
 SEC requirements for Electronic Documents Retention?  Is there a better
way?
 Or Better Software?

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: one more SMTP puzzle

2003-01-15 Thread Daniel Chenault
All on it's own the bits and bytes spinning in a virtual world of magnetic
potentialities up and changed themselves.

Yeah-huh, right.

- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: one more SMTP puzzle


He says server was working fine and this started occurring all of a sudden.

-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: one more SMTP puzzle


 I narrowed it down to his virtual SMTP server. It does not
 like when someone says EHLO to it and immediately drops connection.

 220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service,
 Version: 5.0.2195.53
 29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:28:08 -0500
 EHLO andrey_pc
 500 Failed to exchange X-LSA info, closing transmission channel

 Connection to host lost.


 When I say HELO, everything works fine --

 220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service,
 Version: 5.0.2195.53
 29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:29:31 -0500
 helo andrey_pc
 250 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Hello [207.21.208.111]

Sounds like something in your set-up complies with RFC821 but not RFC2821.
Can't think of any tests off-hand that would confirm this though.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: RPC Question

2003-01-14 Thread Daniel Chenault
Depends on the connection and how it is built; it's determined by the
software. Note there is a choice in later versions of OL (starting with 98 I
believe) to use RPC encryption. The level of encryption is based on the
bitness of the underlying OS.

You don't find too many whitepapers on it because it's not a user-accessible
feature; look in MSDN.

- Original Message -
From: Clemens, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 10:04 AM
Subject: RPC Question


 Is RPC Encrypted?  If so how?  How strong is the Encryption?  I can't find
 whitepapers that talk about RPC.any help would be greatly appreciated.

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: messages frozen in an SMTP queue

2003-01-13 Thread Daniel Chenault
If BLAT failed the problem is on his end. Period.

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: messages frozen in an SMTP queue


Hi all. I have Exchange 2000, SP3.

Due to company's needs some of our mail is being directly forwarded to
another mail server which is running on Linux and someone else is taking
care of that mail server. That persona also thinks that there could be no
problems on the Linux side.

Here is the problem.

Some of the mail that our Exchange server receives and forwards to the Linux
server is spam.

Some of this spam gets stuck (frozen) in the Linux server -bound SMTP queue.
The queue goes into retry state with comment connection was dropped by the
remote host. Once the bad message gets frozen, all the subsequent
messages get stuck - Linux server keeps dropping connection every time the
Exchange server retries the bad message, and the good messages can't flow
around the bad one.

The Linux guy just thinks that this is Exchange problem, since they receive
mail from everywhere else without problems.

The Exchange SMTP logs don't show anything specific - MAIL FROM is OK, RCPT
TO is OK, Exchange server says DATA and Linux server says READY FOR DATA.
That's when there is no more communication until the next retry. The Linux
guy says oh, your Exchange server does not understand READY FOR DATA and
times out. To which I answer, how about 99% of messages that the Echange
server delivers to your Linux server without problems?

So I fished out the file of the bad message from the queue and tried to BLAT
it directly to the Linux server. BLAT failed. So to me it looks like the
problem is with the data in the message, and Linux server does not like it.

When I look at the message file in Notepad, I see a bunch of weird square []
characters, probably un-common carriage returns.

My feeling is that the Linux server does not like those characters or their
quantity.

Does anyone here have experienced similar problems when sending mail from
Exchange to Linux?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Customizing the uncustomizable

2003-01-10 Thread Daniel Chenault
MCS only.

-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable


Is RLQuickED a MCS-provided only tool, or something publically available. A
quick Google on RLQuickED didn't turn up anything.

-Walden


Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
(208) 692-3308 eFax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.TechSoftInc.com 

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
 

-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable


We worked with MCS and they provided me with the RLQuickED utility.  It was
not intuitive to use and took me about 2 hours of playing with the utility
to understand how it worked.  Afterwards I was able to modify the dll change
text and add additional paragraphs that made better sense and was customized
for our environment.  We have not had any problems, and this dll is used on
all 4 of our exchange 2000 servers in production.

Jason
Qualcomm, Inc.

-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 6:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable


The nasty bit is where it then goes on and suggests moving items to your PST
file which is something most of us are trying to avoid at all costs!

I've tried out the RLQuikED tool to edit the dll which contains this message
in the past following an old posting on this list (in a test lab), but it's
not something I would ever consider using in production. MCS or someone like
Chris Scharff are one solution to edit the actual message.  However a
simpler  possibly cheaper solution might be to simply script some automatic
message when your monitoring/reporting software detects a mailbox over a
certain size.

Mark

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 07 January 2003 14:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable


What's so hard to understand about, you're over your limit, please reduce
the size of your mailbox.

John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.



-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:17 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Customizing the uncustomizable
Subject: Customizing the uncustomizable


Does the hard-coded 'mailbox limits warning' message (my description) unique
to a specific file? If so, perhaps I could hex-edit the darn thing to say
something more meaningful..

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain 
personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically 
stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do 
not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in 
reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the 
BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will 
signify your consent to this.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List 

RE: How do I explain NDRs Question

2003-01-09 Thread Daniel Chenault
I use the USPS as my analogy. I do believe when Mr. Postel wrote the
original RFC he used the Post Office as his model.

-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How do I explain NDRs Question


I don't think that the telephone analogy will explain multiple relay
hosts/delivery path options nor MX records. 

-Original Message-
From: Chris Jordan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 3:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How do I explain NDRs Question


Telephone analogy again.

Once the phone connection is complete, then you might still talk English at
one end, and try to talk to someone who only understands Russian at the
other end.

This type of fully connected but of no use at all can be used to explain
the problems with the different layers in the network model, or the
difference between SMTP and X.400 when sending e-mail.

Cheers, Chris


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 January 2003 04:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How do I explain NDRs Question


I've seen some that talk into the receiver and listen to the transmitter.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How do I explain NDRs Question


I have seen some non-technical types that like to send telephones flying
across the office and smashing into the wall.


-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How do I explain NDRs Question


A nickels worth from the peanut gallery.

I have found that a phone number analogy works quite well with the
Non-Technical.  They can associate with a wrong number, and number not in
service, and circuit overloads (all phones lines busy), it's a picture they
understand quite well.  Plus it is very easy to draw the picture using
non-technical terms.

Best of luck
Scott
We may be in an E-Mail world, but phonology seems to be an instinctive trait
in humans yet.

-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How do I explain NDRs Question

I did a delete of the thread and then thought that perhaps the data should
be expanded.

But, note that the comments including Daniel's were right on.


Explaining how mail delivery works to non-experts is not easy.  It involves
explaining address resolution both within NT domains and in the DNS world.
It also involves explaining the role of relay hosts and any address
rewriting that is going on.  For most people, words are not going to cut it.

Years ago our Exchange team faced the same problem and developed a system of
very simple charts that show a check list of each system or handshake that
has to occur, and then a separate chart explaining exactly how each one
works, packet by packet.  They called these happy charts.  Now admittedly,
even these are not telling the truth, in that the role of caches in the
switches and routers is left out, and it is assumed that things like DNS
resolution actually hit the DNS servers every time, but that's a level of
complexity (or honesty) that is not really necessary to get your points
across.  I think you would do well to draw your happy charts.  They will
make explaining the shorthand a lot easier.

My hesitation in mentioning this stems from the fact that it is in the
archives maybe a dozen times, but periodic repetition is not a bad thing I
guess.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 

Re: Syncing items in Public Folders Favorites

2003-01-09 Thread Daniel Chenault
The person attempted to delete an item and does not have the rights to do
so. The delete operation is failing during sync and thus the message.

Clear it by removing the folder from being synched, synch once, then add it
back.

- Original Message -
From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:02 AM
Subject: Syncing items in Public Folders Favorites




We have some users that consistently get errors when syncing some items
inside Public Folder Favorites.  See the log:

7:47:47 Error synchronizing message 'FW: ShopKo 1/14/03 Top Hit Endcap'
7:47:47  [80070005-508-80070005-322]
7:47:47  You do not have sufficient permission to
perform
this operation on this object.  See the folder contact or your system
administrator.

We have recreated the Outlook profile and the ost file and they still
get the error.  Other users with the same rights do not.  We are using
EX2000 SP3.  The clients are using Outlook 2002 on Windows XP no SP's.
They are connecting via a RAS dial in with RADIUS.  Any idea's?

Thanks



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Opinions on the best message format.

2003-01-09 Thread Daniel Chenault
Plain text because any mail client in the world can read it.

- Original Message - 
From: Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:02 AM
Subject: Opinions on the best message format.


Hi,

I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in
Outlook 98.  

Text/HTML or RTF. 

Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful.

The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3.

Thanks,
Darrin

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Customizing the uncustomizable

2003-01-09 Thread Daniel Chenault
And when the file gets overwritten by a service pack you'll have to do it
all over again.

-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable


We worked with MCS and they provided me with the RLQuickED utility.  It was
not intuitive to use and took me about 2 hours of playing with the utility
to understand how it worked.  Afterwards I was able to modify the dll change
text and add additional paragraphs that made better sense and was customized
for our environment.  We have not had any problems, and this dll is used on
all 4 of our exchange 2000 servers in production.

Jason
Qualcomm, Inc.

-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 6:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable


The nasty bit is where it then goes on and suggests moving items to your PST
file which is something most of us are trying to avoid at all costs!

I've tried out the RLQuikED tool to edit the dll which contains this message
in the past following an old posting on this list (in a test lab), but it's
not something I would ever consider using in production. MCS or someone like
Chris Scharff are one solution to edit the actual message.  However a
simpler  possibly cheaper solution might be to simply script some automatic
message when your monitoring/reporting software detects a mailbox over a
certain size.

Mark

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 07 January 2003 14:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable


What's so hard to understand about, you're over your limit, please reduce
the size of your mailbox.

John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.



-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:17 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Customizing the uncustomizable
Subject: Customizing the uncustomizable


Does the hard-coded 'mailbox limits warning' message (my description) unique
to a specific file? If so, perhaps I could hex-edit the darn thing to say
something more meaningful..

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain 
personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically 
stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do 
not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in 
reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the 
BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will 
signify your consent to this.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email

2003-01-09 Thread Daniel Chenault
Both archived and a FAQ.

-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email


Using Outlook 2k connecting to Exchange 5.5 I am trying to set a rule to
forward all email to a different external email.  The error message
says:  Changes to the rule could not be saved.   There is not enough
memory or the rules are too complex.  Try deleting some rules

This is the only rule I have and my email box is empty.  Any ideas? Found
nothing on Technet or Google search.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Access to Exchange Server

2003-01-09 Thread Daniel Chenault
Dang, ain't much that can't be accessed. FTP is not there, nor is a web
server, but hey, with 135 and 139 there are possibilities.

Perhaps you should considering hiring a security consultant to go over your
current setup? *cough*personal plug*cough*

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Access to Exchange Server


Why wouldn't they be able to access the server given the open ports?[1]
Here's a list of your currently open ports...

 Open Port: 25
 Open Port: 27
 Open Port: 110
 Open Port: 119
 Open Port: 135
 Open Port: 139
 Open Port: 143
 Open Port: 389
 Open Port: 445
 Open Port: 563
 Open Port: 593
 Open Port: 636
 Open Port: 993
 Open Port: 995
 Open Port: 1030
 Open Port: 1032
 Open Port: 1035
 Open Port: 1037
 Open Port: 1041
 Open Port: 1043
 Open Port: 1047
 Open Port: 1049
 Open Port: 1051
 Open Port: 1053
 Open Port: 1069


[1] Should be using VPN to access.

On 1/9/03 8:03, Cooke, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



See that's what I thought as well.  I even opened up a ticket with Cisco and

went through our entire settings and they couldn't find any holes that would

be allowing this type of access.  

Brian Cooke 
Systems Administrator 
U.S. Inspect 

-Original Message- 
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:20 PM 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Subject: RE: Access to Exchange Server 


You mean they can get in from the Internet?  Your firewall is 
misconfigured. 

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP 
Technical Consultant 
hp Services 
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. 


-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Cooke, Brian 
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 1:03 PM 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Subject: Access to Exchange Server 


I have a problem with access to our Exchange server. We are using 
Exchange 5.5 and have just migrated from NT 4.0 to Win2K Advanced 
server. The old server was also the PDC and it still is. Recently I 
realized that anyone with Outlook and internet access can access the 
server as long as they know the name or IP adress of the server, can 
authenticate to our PDC, and there is a mailbox for that user. This did 
not happen with our old server. We use a PIX 520 firewall so I contacted 
Cisco and they seem to think our firewall config is correct. Both the 
PDC and the Exchange server have external IP addresses and there is an 
mx record for the Exchange server. Anyone got any ideas? 

Thanks in advance, 
Brian 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: email account does not...

2003-01-06 Thread Daniel Chenault
And that server is running:
220 mpd.com.sg ESMTP Sendmail 8.11.6/8.11.6; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 22:42:39 +0800

The explanation should be pretty straightforward.

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: email account does not...


Ahh fun.. NDR's are the worst things in the world to the uninitiated.

exchange.Domain1.mpdinc.com #5.1.1 smtp;550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]...
User unknown

That's your server reporting that, when it attempts to deliver the message,
the server for mpd.com.sg doesn't have a record of jessie@..



--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


 -Original Message-
 From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 8:55 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: email account does not...
 
 
 Every once in a while we are getting the following message from our 
 Exchange server stating that the following:
 
 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
 Subject: RE: email issue
 Sent: 12/31/2002 6:59 AM
 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Liemphetcharat, 
 Jessie on 12/31/2002 6:59 AM The e-mail account does not exist at the 
 organization this message was sent to. Check the e-mail address, or 
 contact the recipient directly to
 find out the correct address.
 exchange.Domain1.mpdinc.com #5.1.1 smtp;550 5.1.1 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 User unknown
 
 This is on of our subsidiaries and they are using another ISP
 for there
 internet and email access.  There ISP is stating that our Exchange
 server is the problem because it is bouncing back the above message.
 
 However, after we have made them aware of what we are
 experiencing...it
 mysteriously starts working again.
 
 I'm trying to explain to my NON-TECHNICAL CEO, BOSS, and to their ISP 
 that its not our server.
 
 Can anyone suggest to me any help on describing what we are
 experiencing
 and why it's not our server?
 
 
 
 
 Thank you,
 
 Ron Crumbaker, MCP
 PC Systems Administrator
 MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Office 270-685-6381
 Fax 270-685-6212
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Message Delay

2003-01-03 Thread Daniel Chenault
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1891.txt

-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 7:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Message Delay


All,

Has anyone seen this message be sent back to them?  What is it?  And should
I be worried?


This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.

YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE.

The list of email addresses are below.



__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support  Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Setting Exchange Services to Manual using commanline switches

2002-12-29 Thread Daniel Chenault
Yeah, what he said.

-Original Message-
From: Steve Rollings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 6:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Setting Exchange Services to Manual using commanline switches


Open the subkey corresponding to the service you wish to change, and modify
the value of 'Start' to equal either 2 (for automatic), 3 (for manual)
or 4 (for disabled) 

http://www.winguides.com/registry/display.php/198/

:)
4

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 9:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Setting Exchange Services to Manual using commanline switches


Or a .REG file imported. Can't remember off the top of my head what the
numbers are to represent disabled, manual and automatic but a little
experimenting and poling will reveal them.

- Original Message -
From: Brian Ko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 2:13 PM
Subject: Setting Exchange Services to Manual using commanline switches


 Hello!

 Does anyone know how to change Exchange Services to manual from 
 Automatic via Command Line switches?  Is it possible?  I have been 
 looking for this answer for a while, but I have not been able to find 
 it.

 Thanks in advance,

 Brian


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Outlook Security

2002-12-28 Thread Daniel Chenault
IMAP will do that as well.

- Original Message -
From: Tim John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 1:39 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook Security


 Thanks for the reply. I have played with BLAT and Jmail, but the beauty of
 using the MAPI client is that it stores a copy of the email in the 'sent
 Items' folder. I suppose I could just blind copy the email to another
 address and use that as the copy. M 


 -Original Message-
 From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Saturday, 28 December 2002 12:29 p.m.
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Outlook Security



 
  I have a VB app that generates an email using my MAPI profile
  and sends them out automatically. Since the security update,
  I get a warning message and a Yes/No prompt. If I change the
  VB code that '.send's the email and mark it as (vbYes), it
  simply opens the mail object and I have to click 'Send'
  before it will go.

 I find it much easier to NOT use MAPI when sending mail with VB.  You
 can do it directly using the Winsock control or you can buy a SMTP
 ActiveX control.  You could also use a program like BLAT in conjunction
 with the shellexecute command.

 -Kevin

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 DISCLAIMER: The content of this email is confidential and may contain
 legally privileged information intended only for the individual or entity
 named above.  Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised.  If
you
 are not the intended recipient, please be advised that the use,
distribution
 and publication of the above information is prohibited. If you have
received
 this email in error, please contact Domainz by returning the email and
 destroying the original. Thank you.

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Setting Exchange Services to Manual using commanline switches

2002-12-27 Thread Daniel Chenault
Or a .REG file imported. Can't remember off the top of my head what the
numbers are to represent disabled, manual and automatic but a little
experimenting and poling will reveal them.

- Original Message -
From: Brian Ko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 2:13 PM
Subject: Setting Exchange Services to Manual using commanline switches


 Hello!

 Does anyone know how to change Exchange Services to manual from
 Automatic via Command Line switches?  Is it possible?  I have been
 looking for this answer for a while, but I have not been able to find
 it.

 Thanks in advance,

 Brian


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: KB Article 319206 - O2K2 Use closes GC

2002-12-23 Thread Daniel Chenault
Offhand I'd say it first checks the subnet, then response times.

- Original Message - 
From: Andrew Hitchcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 3:25 PM
Subject: KB Article 319206 - O2K2 Use closes GC


 Hello all,
Has anyone had a chance to try out the Closest GC setting under 
 
 HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider 
 
 mentioned in KB Article 319206?
 
 The article tells you how to set it, but doesn't tell you how Outlook
 figures out which GC is closest. Does anyone know how this works? Is
 this based on site membership and SRV record lookups? Is there any
 downside to doing this?
 
 Any information would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Online Defragmentation

2002-12-19 Thread Daniel Chenault
And don't turn it off. Set it to run in the offhours. And whoever set it to
run during the day, remove his admin privileges.

- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation


 IS Maint Tab
 Properties of the Server.

 - Original Message -
 From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM
 Subject: Online Defragmentation


  Dear DL Members,
 
  Our environment looks like this.
 
  NT Server 4.0 with SP6a
  Exchange 5.5 with SP4
 
  One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation
  during the business day.  During this time, and shortly after, Outlook
 2000
  Clients hang (hour glass).
  In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical
  order).
 
 
  Event ID 179
  Source = ESE97
  Category = Online Defragmentation
  Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database
  x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb
 
  Event ID 180
  Source = ESE97
  Category = Online Defragmentation
  Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database
  x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb
 
  Event ID 181
  Source = ESE97
  Category = Online Defragmentation
  Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database
  x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb
 
  Event ID 1207
  Source = MSExchangeIS Private
  Category = General
  The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online
  defragmentation has terminated
 
  Event ID 1221
  Source = MSExchangeIS Private
  Category = General
  Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete.
  Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes
  End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes
 
 
  How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes
  place during off hours?
 
 
  Rob Garrish
  Windows NT Engineer
  Wawa Inc.
  610-558-8371
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OL XP - requesting data from server

2002-12-19 Thread Daniel Chenault
Although in another message you mentioned something about the server being
uninstalled and reinstalled or something like that leaving an orphan FB
folder.

- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM
Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server


I have seen this. But we have only one server.

-Original Message-
From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server


I have found this to be related to attempts to find a Public Folder or
Organizatuonal Form that might be homed on another server other than the
users account. It could also be just heavy traffic or views.

From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:42:01 -0500

That's the feature of XP.

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OL XP - requesting data from server


Hey all. I am really getting tired of hearing again and again from my users
that their Outlook XP pops up a progress bar that slowly crawls across and
says Outlook is requesting data from Exchange server.

This is happening to our internal Outlook XP users. The users and the
Exchange server are on the same LAN.

What is wrong with this XP?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retenti on=0

2002-12-18 Thread Daniel Chenault
Two choices:
1. Do a Disaster Recovery to a standby server. Extract the necessary data to
a PST. Admonish the user that important mail doesn't go in the Deleted Items
folder.
2. Tell the customer he's toast and show him some best practices.

-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retention=0
Importance: High


Hi, 
I have an urgent question. One of our customers incidentally deleted some
important mails from deleted items folder. Deleted items retention is set to
0 for private information store, so it cannot be recovered using this
feature. There is no current backup. I know, that mails still probably are
somewhere in exchange database, but marked as white space. Is there any way
to get it back, or is it completely lost ?

If anyone is sure that it is possible or impossible, send me email as
quickly as possible ...

Thanks a lot

Honza Novak

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Event ID: 1174

2002-12-18 Thread Daniel Chenault
Well, uh... an unauthenticated logon was attempted. What part of this is
mysterious?

- Original Message -
From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM
Subject: Event ID: 1174


 Exchange 5.5.  NT 4.0.

 Anybody seen this error message?  Our log is full of them from beginning
to
 end.
 I checked TechNet, but didn't see anything matching the error message.

 Event ID: 1174
 Source: MSExchangeDS
 Type: Information
 Category: Security

 Description:  An unauthenticated logon was attempted.

 Thanks.

 Robert

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

2002-12-18 Thread Daniel Chenault
On a technical list I'm on that concerns Exchange (among other things)
someone forwarded to the list someone's OOF from a major company. From his
name and location the person found his address on the web. Since his OOF
said he'd be gone for two weeks, out of town on vacation, he essentially is
telling the whole world his house is unattended and ripe for picking.

Bad idea. It's just a bad idea.

- Original Message -
From: Archie Call [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:01 PM
Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk


 Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to be
 turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5.  I have seen comments on this
 newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this!  I have
 looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this discussion.  I
 remember someone who wrote a little story that was very convincing.

 The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange or
 Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and your
 house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid address; much
 increased mail traffic especially during a virus outbreat; you send
 numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer.

 If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated.

 ...Archie Call

 Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter.

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Exch5.5 - IMC (port 25) going down every morning

2002-12-17 Thread Daniel Chenault
There are only two ways spam will be sitting in your outbound queue:
1. You're an open relay
2. You're sending it yourself

Don't take it as an accusation, take it as a logical conclusion.

-Original Message-
From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exch5.5 - IMC (port 25) going down every morning


So Daniel, why would you assume that I am running a relay server?

You seem so sure of yourself that there is absolutely no possibility of
anything else gone wrong!

Like I've stated already, unless the authority on Open Relays (www.ordb.org)
is totally wrong, I'm afraid you've just jumped to an erroneous conclusion.

SDC

-
Subject: Re: Exch5.5 - IMC (port 25) going down every morning (for past 3
week s)
From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 17:23:02 -0600
X-Message-Number: 54

Perhaps you should close your machine against relay.

- Original Message -
From: Shawn Connelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 1:19 PM
Subject: Exch5.5 - IMC (port 25) going down every morning (for past 3 week
s)


 I am wondering if you have the same problem I am experiencing.

 Are you using Exchange 5.5?

 For the past 3 weeks, my IMC has been going down (port 25 down) every 
 morning around 4am.  In the out box, I'll always find about 10 or so 
 SPAM messages.  Most of the time I can stop / start IMC and port 25 
 will come back alive, however, occasionally the stop / start method 
 doesn't work.  I have found it necessary to clear out the SPAM first.

 Anyone else experience this.  Previously, this problem would occur 
 about once in every five months but now it's every single day!!

 Shawn

 P.S. You can stop and start IMC in a batch file with the following
command:
 net stop MSExchangeIMC
 net start MSExchangeIMC


 --
 
-
 Shawn Connelly, Network Engineer.

---S
hawn Connelly, Network Engineer.  Dipix Technologies Inc.   
613-596-4942 x177  or dial extension 0 to page me. 
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client

2002-12-17 Thread Daniel Chenault
If it's doing NAT I don't think it'll work.

- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:23 PM
Subject: OT: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client


Hi all.

Does anyone here use BellSouth DSL service?

I just got it installed and it is working great. However when I am on DSL, I
can't connect to my corporate network with the MS VPN client.

My setup at home is:
Win ME or Win 2K Pro with MS VPN client
BellSouth gave me Westell WireSpeed DSL modem
I bought D-Link 614+ Wireless router. However my PC is wired. D-Link is not
blocking any outgoing traffic.

I have even tried to bypass D-Link and connected straight to the Westell
modem. Still no luck. The Westell modem is actually a router with a firewall
but as far as I can see it is not blocking any outgoing traffic.

I can ping the external IP address of the VPN server. MS VPN client can see
it too but it times out on Verifying username and password and gives error
650.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Maximum mailboxes Exchange5.5. can hold

2002-12-17 Thread Daniel Chenault
In terms of programming logic I recall it was on the order of 2^20, twenty
times more than what you heard.

- Original Message -
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:57 PM
Subject: Maximum mailboxes Exchange5.5. can hold


 I would like to know what is the maximum mailboxes that Exchange 5.5.
 Enterprise can hold. I heard it was 50, 000, but i am not sure

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Add custom smtp header ?

2002-12-16 Thread Daniel Chenault
Nope.

-Original Message-
From: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 2:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Add custom smtp header ?


Is it possible to add a custom smtp header to outgoing email with EX5.5 ?
I'd like to add a X-CUSTOM-something: data to outgoing email. More than
that, if possible I'd like to add that data from code running in a custom
form. Any chances ? Heiko

-- 
-- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Via Ferretto, 1ph  x39-041-5907073
-- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472
-- ITALY

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Imcoming mail and relaying logging

2002-12-13 Thread Daniel Chenault
Not without an external program. The specific functionality you seek is not
inherent in the product beyond archiving and/or logging. Since you have
programmers available they could write something to parse out the archives.

-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 9:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Imcoming mail and relaying logging


I am running exchange 5.5 sp3 on NT 4 sp6a. I would like to know if there is
a way I can log the domains of all incoming mail on the IMS as well as log
any attempt to relay. Had to add some domains that override relay
restrictions and just want to monitor for a few days. Need to make sure that
we are not allowing any spam to get to the domains that we are allowing to
override. We are trying to implement SSL but having problems getting it to
work on our programmers end.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Exchange log file utils and tools

2002-12-13 Thread Daniel Chenault
Crystal Reports, comes with Exchange

- Original Message - 
From: Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:46 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange log file utils and tools


 Anyone out there with a free one?
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Randy Roffey
 Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 10:14 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Exchange log file utils and tools
 
 
 
 
 Hypersoft has OmniAnalyser
 
 Quest has MessageStats
 
 NetIQ has AppAnalyzer
 
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Jerry J. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 11:30 AM
 Subject: Exchange log file utils and tools
 
 
  Looking for any apps etc that will be able to take an exchange log 
  file and do reporting. Not completely sure what I want it to do. One 
  thing that would be nice is to show who sent what to who etc But any 
  info on utilities for exchange log files would be great to take a look
 
  at. Have seen one webserver log analyzer that gives me some info about
 
  addresses but would like something more suited to a mail server.
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Exch5.5 - IMC (port 25) going down every morning (for past 3 week s)

2002-12-13 Thread Daniel Chenault
Perhaps you should close your machine against relay.

- Original Message -
From: Shawn Connelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 1:19 PM
Subject: Exch5.5 - IMC (port 25) going down every morning (for past 3 week
s)


 I am wondering if you have the same problem I am experiencing.

 Are you using Exchange 5.5?

 For the past 3 weeks, my IMC has been going down (port 25 down) every
 morning around 4am.  In the out box, I'll always find about 10 or so SPAM
 messages.  Most of the time I can stop / start IMC and port 25 will come
 back alive, however, occasionally the stop / start method doesn't work.  I
 have found it necessary to clear out the SPAM first.

 Anyone else experience this.  Previously, this problem would occur about
 once in every five months but now it's every single day!!

 Shawn

 P.S. You can stop and start IMC in a batch file with the following
command:
 net stop MSExchangeIMC
 net start MSExchangeIMC


 --
-
 Shawn Connelly, Network Engineer.  Dipix Technologies Inc.
 613-596-4942 x177  or dial extension 0 to page me.
 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 We are market leaders in 2D/3D digital vision systems for inspection of
fast
 moving products. See our web page at: www.dipix.com.
 General sales inquires: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For microscopic image analysis see www.maztech.com!


 --

 Subject: How to resend stuck messages in IMC
 From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Eve=20Jimah?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 13:13:52 + (GMT)
 X-Message-Number: 8

 MTA stops intermetently, after re starting the service
 noticed that mails are stuck in the IN out OUT folder
 of the IMC. Each folder size is over 5gb. In view of
 the size of the mails I do not want to delete the
 content of these folder.

 My question now is how to resend these messages.
 My server is an NT4 box with exchange 5.5 service pack
 3



 Thanks


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail....

2002-12-12 Thread Daniel Chenault
Do you mean move the domain accounts, or the mail accounts? If the latter,
setup a trust from the US to the UK. Use Exmerge to extract the UK users'
data and import it into the US server. There's not going to be an automated
way to do this, sorry. Add to your laundry list administrative headache
and charge them some overtime (but you're probably exempt).

-Original Message-
From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 7:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail


Daniel:  Yes, email over a Internet based VPN, across the pond, nothing but
Net...  :)  As I said, I protested and gave the administration quite a
laundry list of why it wasn't the best way to run thing, but they are the
ones who pay the money so they're the ones who get to make the decision.

Andrea:  Thanks. I guess I should've referenced the materials I've read
(including the MSKB article you referenced), a couple of the MS migration
whitepapers, and a couple of Exchange books...  Unfortunately they all
reference moving things within the same domain...  I need to know if I can
use the accounts from the child domain on the parent domain's Exch server,
which I can't find a straight answer to (of course, I've probably not worded
my question correctly in all the Internet searching I've done)

Joe Pochedley
If you have time to do it twice, 
you had time to do it right in
the first place.


-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 6:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail


You might want to look at
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;316886 for some
ideas.  Other than that, the MS KB is a good source of info.  It's got loads
of good step by step guides.


-Original Message-
From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 11 December 2002 9:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail


Kind ladies and gentlemen, looking for a little feedback on an Exchange mess
that I've been tasked with handling.

We're located in the USA and recently we purchased a company based out of
the UK.  The administration has asked me to consolidate the Exchange servers
(one at each company) into a single server.  Of course I protested
veheminently about having a single server for both the US and UK, gave them
many many reasons why it shouldn't be done, but ultimately the decision was
theirs  AH well

We're currently running Exch5.5 on an NT4 domain, and the purchased company
is running the same...  I am in the process of testing and preparing to
deploy Win2K and AD here in the USA...  After AD's in place I plan to
upgrade our Exch5.5 to Exch2K.

Now for the messy part...  I need to get the UK's mailboxes moved to our
Exch2K server...  What I was planning was this:  Upgrade their network to
Win2K as a child domain of ours...  Then using Exmerge, pull out their
mailboxes and transfer them to our Exchange server (they've only got a 600mb
priv.edb, so it's nothing compared to our 90Gb database)... I've read on
migration strategies, etc, but nothing really covers moving mail from one
domain to another or if making them a child domain (basically creating a two
way transitive trust between the two domains) gets around the problem...

So the questions are these:  Can I make new mailboxes on the USA Exch2K
server from users in the child domain in the UK (I assume the answer is yes,
but I haven't gotten that far in testing yet and I'm just trying to avoid
some head banging if someone can tell me it can't be done)?   Is there
an
easier way to accomplish this?  How can I move the Public folders to our
Exch server?

Thanks in advance for your kind wisdom.

Joe Pochedley
If you have time to do it twice, 
you had time to do it right in
the first place.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:

RE: Odd message from other mail server

2002-12-12 Thread Daniel Chenault
Ensure that the webware SMTP daemon is indeed sending .CRLF. to end the
SMTP conversation. This is what the error message is referring to. Some
mailers aren't as strict about it but that is the proper format. Qmail is
claiming that the mailer is sending .LF. to end the conversation.

-Original Message-
From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 8:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Odd message from other mail server



I am getting an odd response from a mail server that I am attempting to send
a message to (fast.net).  Here is the message that their server is sending
at the end of my message.  451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html;
A main snippet, referencing the error, from that website says:

It was generated by qmail, an Internet message transfer agent. Your mailer
tried to send an e-mail message to a server running qmail. Unfortunately,
qmail spotted a problem: your mailer sent a bare LF.

There are a couple of things that are odd about the situation.

1. The mail that is being rejected appears to have a CR at the end of the
message.  The message end just like all the other messages that are sent or
received by our server.  Here is a portion of the capture of the data stream
from the message that generates the error.

href=http://www.tankstatus.com/ssa_pipeline;SSA Version 1.0/a Copyright
(c) Intelligent Controls, Inc. 1997-2002/font
/body
/html

.
451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
QUIT
221 Catch you later

In the actual capture utility window it shows a box [] after the period just
above the line starting with '451 See...'

2. The mail that is sent and rejected is auto generated by one of our web
servers (tankstatus.com) based on an event.  It is in HTML format and
relayed through our Exchange 5.5 server (on separate box).  An original
message is attached.

3. I am able to sent mail to the host in question (fast.net) from my work
station (outlook 2002).  The main difference is that my mails are not in
html format.

4. We operate this service for several customers and have never had a
problem with them receiving our automated emails, which for the most part
are identical.

This is so odd that I am not even sure where to go to trouble shoot, or even
what question(s) to ask in this list.  Has anyone got any insight, former
experience, suggestions or smart ass comments?  At this point anything would
be helpful.

Doug

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail....

2002-12-12 Thread Daniel Chenault
Get header.exe from the Exchange RK and use it to create a header file
including all the information you want to import including the domain
account. Export the user list from the UK box, munge the account field with
an appropriate tool (Excel) and import it into your server.

- Original Message -
From: Joe Pochedley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 9:57 AM
Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail


 You're right, I'm overtime exempt...  :(

 I understand there's not going to be a manual way to do it, but I've used
 Exmerge in the past, and have gotten along quite well with it, so I
believe
 I'll be fine...  It's only about 40 mailboxes...

 As I said in my original email, I'm hopping to create the mailboxes and
 associate them to domain accounts in a child domain (made from the UK's
old
 NT4 domain joining our forest as a child)...  Still hoping someone can
tell
 me if this can be done?

 Joe Pochedley
 If you have time to do it twice,
 you had time to do it right in
 the first place.


 -Original Message-
 From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 9:57 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail


 Do you mean move the domain accounts, or the mail accounts? If the latter,
 setup a trust from the US to the UK. Use Exmerge to extract the UK users'
 data and import it into the US server. There's not going to be an
automated
 way to do this, sorry. Add to your laundry list administrative headache
 and charge them some overtime (but you're probably exempt).

 -Original Message-
 From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 7:08 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail


 Daniel:  Yes, email over a Internet based VPN, across the pond, nothing
but
 Net...  :)  As I said, I protested and gave the administration quite a
 laundry list of why it wasn't the best way to run thing, but they are the
 ones who pay the money so they're the ones who get to make the decision.

 Andrea:  Thanks. I guess I should've referenced the materials I've read
 (including the MSKB article you referenced), a couple of the MS migration
 whitepapers, and a couple of Exchange books...  Unfortunately they all
 reference moving things within the same domain...  I need to know if I can
 use the accounts from the child domain on the parent domain's Exch server,
 which I can't find a straight answer to (of course, I've probably not
worded
 my question correctly in all the Internet searching I've done)

 Joe Pochedley
 If you have time to do it twice,
 you had time to do it right in
 the first place.


 -Original Message-
 From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 6:28 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail


 You might want to look at
 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;316886 for some
 ideas.  Other than that, the MS KB is a good source of info.  It's got
loads
 of good step by step guides.


 -Original Message-
 From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 11 December 2002 9:48 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail


 Kind ladies and gentlemen, looking for a little feedback on an Exchange
mess
 that I've been tasked with handling.

 We're located in the USA and recently we purchased a company based out of
 the UK.  The administration has asked me to consolidate the Exchange
servers
 (one at each company) into a single server.  Of course I protested
 veheminently about having a single server for both the US and UK, gave
them
 many many reasons why it shouldn't be done, but ultimately the decision
was
 theirs  AH well

 We're currently running Exch5.5 on an NT4 domain, and the purchased
company
 is running the same...  I am in the process of testing and preparing to
 deploy Win2K and AD here in the USA...  After AD's in place I plan to
 upgrade our Exch5.5 to Exch2K.

 Now for the messy part...  I need to get the UK's mailboxes moved to our
 Exch2K server...  What I was planning was this:  Upgrade their network to
 Win2K as a child domain of ours...  Then using Exmerge, pull out their
 mailboxes and transfer them to our Exchange server (they've only got a
600mb
 priv.edb, so it's nothing compared to our 90Gb database)... I've read on
 migration strategies, etc, but nothing really covers moving mail from one
 domain to another or if making them a child domain (basically creating a
two
 way transitive trust between the two domains) gets around the problem...

 So the questions are these:  Can I make new mailboxes on the USA Exch2K
 server from users in the child domain in the UK (I assume the answer is
yes,
 but I haven't

Re: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail....

2002-12-11 Thread Daniel Chenault
You mean the UK users will have to access their mail over a link across the
pond? Oy...

Exmerge the whole mess out, give the PSTs to the users. Create the accounts
in your server and be done with it.

- Original Message -
From: Joe Pochedley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 2:47 PM
Subject: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail


 Kind ladies and gentlemen, looking for a little feedback on an Exchange
mess
 that I've been tasked with handling.

 We're located in the USA and recently we purchased a company based out of
 the UK.  The administration has asked me to consolidate the Exchange
servers
 (one at each company) into a single server.  Of course I protested
 veheminently about having a single server for both the US and UK, gave
them
 many many reasons why it shouldn't be done, but ultimately the decision
was
 theirs  AH well

 We're currently running Exch5.5 on an NT4 domain, and the purchased
company
 is running the same...  I am in the process of testing and preparing to
 deploy Win2K and AD here in the USA...  After AD's in place I plan to
 upgrade our Exch5.5 to Exch2K.

 Now for the messy part...  I need to get the UK's mailboxes moved to our
 Exch2K server...  What I was planning was this:  Upgrade their network to
 Win2K as a child domain of ours...  Then using Exmerge, pull out their
 mailboxes and transfer them to our Exchange server (they've only got a
600mb
 priv.edb, so it's nothing compared to our 90Gb database)...  I've read on
 migration strategies, etc, but nothing really covers moving mail from one
 domain to another or if making them a child domain (basically creating a
two
 way transitive trust between the two domains) gets around the problem...

 So the questions are these:  Can I make new mailboxes on the USA Exch2K
 server from users in the child domain in the UK (I assume the answer is
yes,
 but I haven't gotten that far in testing yet and I'm just trying to avoid
 some head banging if someone can tell me it can't be done)?   Is there an
 easier way to accomplish this?  How can I move the Public folders to our
 Exch server?

 Thanks in advance for your kind wisdom.

 Joe Pochedley
 If you have time to do it twice,
 you had time to do it right in
 the first place.


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Strange NDR

2002-12-11 Thread Daniel Chenault
Ah... little light goes on

A clear example of why obfuscating data when asking for help tends to cause
problems.

- Original Message -
From: Hutchins, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 9:24 AM
Subject: RE: Strange NDR


Guys, hidden by jjones 12/6/02 is what he typed in there I think to
hide the users display name. That isn't the actual text of the error

-Original Message-
From: Brown, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 5:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange NDR


Have a look for a hidden mailbox called hidden by jjones 12/6/02

It could be that whoever (or whatever if it is an automated job) bcc'ed
the email to this hidden mailbox, that appears to have restrictions on
the size of emails it can receive.

In the past I have hidden mailboxes and restricted delivery sizes to
them instead of actually deleting the mailbox when the staff member has
left.

Mark

-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 December 2002 8:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange NDR


Received a strange NDR today. On an e-mail sent to someone outside the
organization and the delivery failed. On the NDR it said Your message

  To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Your telemanager.net e-report is ready

did not reach the following recipient(s):

hidden by jjones 12/6/02 lastname, firstname on Mon, 9 Dec 2002
15:25:58 -0500
The content length of the message is too long for the recipient to
take delivery

Now, what is up with the hidden by jjones part? I am the postmaster for
our server and I am not doing anything to the message. I am not even the
person that sent the e-mail. Any ideas?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Strange NDR

2002-12-10 Thread Daniel Chenault
I'll assume 5.5; in Exchange Administrator View:Hidden Recipients.

-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange NDR


Actually what happens is that when I type in the e-mail address that
generated the NDR the alt-K it underlines it. The user with this address
exists at a different company with a different mail server of what type is
unknown to me. Here at my company there are very few users and I already
have the logging cranked up and see nothing. Here is a copy of the NDR with
names changed to protect the innocent. Your message

  To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Your telemanager.net e-report is ready

did not reach the following recipient(s):

hidden by jjones 12/6/02 Guy, Some on Mon, 9 Dec 2002 15:25:58 -0500
The content length of the message is too long for the recipient to take
delivery

So we sent Some Guy an e-mail letting him know that his e-report is ready
for him to view and this is the NDR that I got back. Now if I type
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and alt-k it underlines it. It says that something
was hidden by me but everyone who got this NDR sees the same thing as in the
hidden by part.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cleaning a mailbox

2002-12-10 Thread Daniel Chenault
Nope. First logon will create the mailbox.

- Original Message -
From: Petschow, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:56 AM
Subject: RE: cleaning a mailbox


 That sounds like a good idea. Do I need to do anything after it creates
the
 new priv.edb to sync up the accounts.

 Jeff


  -Original Message-
  From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:39 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: cleaning a mailbox
 
 
  You could literally delete the priv.edb file.
  That will delete all the data, and when you restart Exch, it
  will create a
  new empty one.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:34 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: cleaning a mailbox
 
 
  I have an exchange 5.5 server that is only used by students that take
  training classes in Outlook. After each semester I want to
  delete everything
  in the mailboxes. I have been using mailbox manager but I
  have not found out
  how to remove future appointments from the calendar. Also
  meeting requests
  sometimes do not get deleted. Is there some way to completely remove
  everything. There are 300 mailboxes on this server.
 
  Thanks,
  Jeff Petschow
  College of DuPage
 
 
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Strange NDR

2002-12-09 Thread Daniel Chenault
You mean you type hidden by jjones in the TO: box and it underlines it?
Then it is a recipient on the server assumedly created, and hidden, by
jjones. 

-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange NDR


If you are talking about outlook I type it in and Alt-k and it keeps it the
same, just underlines it. It is a good mailbox for the server as he has been
getting e-mails all day. I have left him a voicemail asking him to send me
an e-mail to confirm that address is not mistyped at all.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Deleting attachments

2002-12-05 Thread Daniel Chenault
www.slipstick.com

-Original Message-
From: Lee Petri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 7:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Deleting attachments


I recently moved from Outlook 98 to Outlook Express 6. In OE6, how do I
delete attachments from received e-mails? Or modify the message in anyway?

My personal folders are huge, so I do whatever I can to get rid of
unnecessary files.

Thanks!
Lee


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: How to resend stuck messages in IMC

2002-12-05 Thread Daniel Chenault
1. Stop the IMS
2. Start the IMS
3. Happens automagically

If you really want to start the queue over
1a. Delete queue.dat

-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 7:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to resend stuck messages in IMC


MTA stops intermetently, after re starting the service
noticed that mails are stuck in the IN out OUT folder
of the IMC. Each folder size is over 5gb. In view of
the size of the mails I do not want to delete the
content of these folder. 

My question now is how to resend these messages.
My server is an NT4 box with exchange 5.5 service pack
3



Thanks

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: eseutil

2002-12-05 Thread Daniel Chenault
On the contrary it can correct some minor inconsistencies as it shuffles
through every page in the database.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: eseutil


eseutil /d does not repair anything.

- Original Message - 
From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:25 AM
Subject: RE: eseutil


 Now I am working off the recovery server and it giving me the same 
 error
as
 the production server.

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:19 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: eseutil


 And?

 -Original Message-
 From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:16 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: eseutil


 I have backup but I don't know when was the last good backup on tape. 
 Just found this error a couple of week ago. They have ask me to build 
 a
recovery
 server and run eseutil /d /ispriv.

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:06 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: eseutil


 Have they asked you to restore from last known good backup and replay 
 the logs or move the users to a new machine and delete the information 
 store from this one and then move the users back?

 Or, more specifically what have they suggested?

  -Original Message-
  From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:03 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
 
  I did call PSS, I try everything they ask me to do but I still get 
  the same error.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:59 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Re: eseutil
 
 
  How many weeks are you going to ask us this before you call PSS?
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:55 AM
  Subject: eseutil
 
 
   Can someone help me with this error.
  
   When I run eseutil /d /ispriv and after about 10% I get this 
   error.
  
   Operation terminated with error -1019
  (JET_errPageNotInitialized, Repair
   Only: Read an unused page) after 384.52 seconds.
   Thank
   Tony N.
  
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   

Re: eseutil

2002-12-05 Thread Daniel Chenault
True, never said it did. I was addressing your statement that eseutil does
not fix repair anything.

- Original Message -
From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: eseutil


 But is that really repairing? You can argue that but those inconsistencies
 do not generate 1018, or 1019 errors.

 - Original Message -
 From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:01 AM
 Subject: RE: eseutil


  On the contrary it can correct some minor inconsistencies as it shuffles
  through every page in the database.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:36 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Re: eseutil
 
 
  eseutil /d does not repair anything.
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:25 AM
  Subject: RE: eseutil
 
 
   Now I am working off the recovery server and it giving me the same
   error
  as
   the production server.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:19 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: eseutil
  
  
   And?
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:16 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: eseutil
  
  
   I have backup but I don't know when was the last good backup on tape.
   Just found this error a couple of week ago. They have ask me to build
   a
  recovery
   server and run eseutil /d /ispriv.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:06 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: eseutil
  
  
   Have they asked you to restore from last known good backup and replay
   the logs or move the users to a new machine and delete the information
   store from this one and then move the users back?
  
   Or, more specifically what have they suggested?
  
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
   
I did call PSS, I try everything they ask me to do but I still get
the same error.
   
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: eseutil
   
   
How many weeks are you going to ask us this before you call PSS?
   
- Original Message -
From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:55 AM
Subject: eseutil
   
   
 Can someone help me with this error.

 When I run eseutil /d /ispriv and after about 10% I get this
 error.

 Operation terminated with error -1019
(JET_errPageNotInitialized, Repair
 Only: Read an unused page) after 384.52 seconds.
 Thank
 Tony N.

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch

Re: eoo.log files

2002-12-05 Thread Daniel Chenault
Put down the mouse, step back from the keyboard, and no one will get hurt.

- Original Message -
From: Jeffery Caudill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:42 AM
Subject: eoo.log files


My exchange server is creating a series of log files in the MDBData dir.
These files are 5mg files and are taking up a lot of space on the server.  I
know that I can delete these file and exchange will still work.  I cannot
find a way to make exchange stop logging this series on files.  any help
would be nice.

Example log file name: EA3E.log

Thanks,
Jeff

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: eoo.log files

2002-12-05 Thread Daniel Chenault
Then let's troubleshoot why tbat operation is not working correctly as
opposed to gutting the server.

- Original Message -
From: Jeffery Caudill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:25 AM
Subject: RE: eoo.log files


I have been to these.  They say that the file will delete after a backup.
the server is backed up every night, and the files are not deleting like
they are suppose to.

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: eoo.log files


Please refer to the FAQ listed in the footer of this and every message.

-Original Message-
From: Jeffery Caudill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:42 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: eseutil
Subject: eoo.log files


My exchange server is creating a series of log files in the MDBData dir.
These files are 5mg files and are taking up a lot of space on the server.  I
know that I can delete these file and exchange will still work.  I cannot
find a way to make exchange stop logging this series on files.  any help
would be nice.

Example log file name: EA3E.log

Thanks,
Jeff

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Monitoring MTA queues

2002-12-05 Thread Daniel Chenault
You mean other then the prebuilt and installed-by-default perfmon objects?

- Original Message - 
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:59 AM
Subject: Monitoring MTA queues


Anyone know of a good way (or script already written) to monitor MTA
queues?  Being that my programming knowledge is VERY sparse, I'd like to
not have to wait to have a solution until I learn how to program it
(it'd be a while...).

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Illegal operation when deleting a recurring meeting

2002-12-04 Thread Daniel Chenault
A calender is a form. Every window displayed in OL (Contacts, new message,
calendar entry, Task, Journal and more) is a form.

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Illegal operation when deleting a recurring meeting


How would this apply to Outlook calendars?  It looks as though it is more
for forms?

Thanks.

Mike

-Original Message-
From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 29 November, 2002 3:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Illegal operation when deleting a recurring meeting


Have you tried clearing out the outlook forms cache?

http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q195/7/54.ASP

Close OLK.
Perform a Find for: Frmcache.dat
Delete it from the Find window.
Restart OLK. (A new frmcache.dat file will be created)

Nikki


 Drew,
 
 Thanks.  We did that when we rebuilt the calendar.
 
 Thanks again.
 
 Mike
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, 27 November, 2002 1:18 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Illegal operation when deleting a recurring meeting
 
 
 Export to PST and import back in?
 
 Drew Nicholson
 Technical Writer
 Network Engineer
 LAN Manager
 RapidApp
 312-372-7188 (work)
 312-543-0008 (cell)
 Born To Edit
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:18 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Illegal operation when deleting a recurring meeting
 
 
 Thanks.  We also did do that...  Sorry I forgot to mention that.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, 27 November, 2002 1:15 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Illegal operation when deleting a recurring meeting
 
 
 Run /cleanfreebusy and/or /cleanreminders
 
 Drew Nicholson
 Technical Writer
 Network Engineer
 LAN Manager
 RapidApp
 312-372-7188 (work)
 312-543-0008 (cell)
 Born To Edit
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:03 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Illegal operation when deleting a recurring meeting
 
 
 Happy Thanksgiving to all,
 
 Good afternoon. Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4.
 
 I have several users that are receiving Illegal Operation messages 
 when deleting an occurrence of a recurring meeting. This causes 
 Outlook to close down.  We have reinstalled the client and have 
 rebuilt the calendar.  In this occurrence, I can have the person 
 cancel a recurring event occurrence and they get an illegal operation 
 from their machine. But when I go to my machine and sign on as them, I 
 can cancel recurring meeting occurrence  without any problems.
 
 Does anyone have any suggestions?  I can't find a think on MS KB.
 
 Thanks.
   
 
 Regards,
 
 Mike Mitchell
 Systems eMAIL Administrator
 Alverno Information Services
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   

RE: Calendar Problems

2002-12-04 Thread Daniel Chenault
How many FB replicas do you have?

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Calendar Problems


Good morning,

Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4

I am beginning to have several problems with Outlook calendars for
resources.  They do not show as scheduled, but people cannot schedule to
them.

We use the AutoAccept utility...  The message comes back saying this
resource is already scheduled.

Please help me understand what to do.

I already ran the outlook /cleanreminders /cleanfreebusy switches.  What am
I missing here?

Thanks.

Regards,

Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Illegal operation when deleting a recurring meeting

2002-12-04 Thread Daniel Chenault
yep
- Original Message -
From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:58 AM
Subject: RE: Illegal operation when deleting a recurring meeting


 Great...  So is the frmcache.dat file used by only Outlook/Exchange?

 -Original Message-
 From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, 04 December, 2002 10:46 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Illegal operation when deleting a recurring meeting


 A calender is a form. Every window displayed in OL (Contacts, new message,
 calendar entry, Task, Journal and more) is a form.

 -Original Message-
 From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:28 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Illegal operation when deleting a recurring meeting


 How would this apply to Outlook calendars?  It looks as though it is more
 for forms?

 Thanks.

 Mike

 -Original Message-
 From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, 29 November, 2002 3:08 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Illegal operation when deleting a recurring meeting


 Have you tried clearing out the outlook forms cache?

 http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q195/7/54.ASP

 Close OLK.
 Perform a Find for: Frmcache.dat
 Delete it from the Find window.
 Restart OLK. (A new frmcache.dat file will be created)

 Nikki


  Drew,
 
  Thanks.  We did that when we rebuilt the calendar.
 
  Thanks again.
 
  Mike
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, 27 November, 2002 1:18 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Illegal operation when deleting a recurring meeting
 
 
  Export to PST and import back in?
 
  Drew Nicholson
  Technical Writer
  Network Engineer
  LAN Manager
  RapidApp
  312-372-7188 (work)
  312-543-0008 (cell)
  Born To Edit
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:18 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Illegal operation when deleting a recurring meeting
 
 
  Thanks.  We also did do that...  Sorry I forgot to mention that.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, 27 November, 2002 1:15 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Illegal operation when deleting a recurring meeting
 
 
  Run /cleanfreebusy and/or /cleanreminders
 
  Drew Nicholson
  Technical Writer
  Network Engineer
  LAN Manager
  RapidApp
  312-372-7188 (work)
  312-543-0008 (cell)
  Born To Edit
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:03 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Illegal operation when deleting a recurring meeting
 
 
  Happy Thanksgiving to all,
 
  Good afternoon. Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4.
 
  I have several users that are receiving Illegal Operation messages
  when deleting an occurrence of a recurring meeting. This causes
  Outlook to close down.  We have reinstalled the client and have
  rebuilt the calendar.  In this occurrence, I can have the person
  cancel a recurring event occurrence and they get an illegal operation
  from their machine. But when I go to my machine and sign on as them, I
  can cancel recurring meeting occurrence  without any problems.
 
  Does anyone have any suggestions?  I can't find a think on MS KB.
 
  Thanks.
 
 
  Regards,
 
  Mike Mitchell
  Systems eMAIL Administrator
  Alverno Information Services
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives

RE: eseutil

2002-12-03 Thread Daniel Chenault
You didn't push for escalation? What makes you think that we can do better
than the people who have the source code? Never, EVER, let a PSS call die
without a resolution. You paid for it, you deserve the full treatment PSS
offers up to and including final escalation (if necessary).

-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: eseutil


I did call PSS, I try everything they ask me to do but I still get the same
error.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: eseutil


How many weeks are you going to ask us this before you call PSS? 

- Original Message - 
From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:55 AM
Subject: eseutil


 Can someone help me with this error.
 
 When I run eseutil /d /ispriv and after about 10% I get this error.
 
 Operation terminated with error -1019 (JET_errPageNotInitialized, 
 Repair
 Only: Read an unused page) after 384.52 seconds.
 Thank
 Tony N.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: setting the default SMTP address for a mailbox

2002-11-29 Thread Daniel Chenault
It's a setting in the user's properties on the Address tab.

- Original Message -
From: Jean-Claude [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 1:40 PM
Subject: setting the default SMTP address for a mailbox


 Does anyone know how to set a default SMTP address on a mailbox? Our
 company has two registered domain name xyz.com and abc.com.  We have added
 the two SMTP addresses to each mailbox.  xyz.com is the old address but is
 still in use.  abc.com is the new address.  The problem is that the emails
 sent by our users are going as originating from xyz.com address.  We would
 the address to say abc.com since we are going to discontinue xyz.com in
 the coming months.
 Thanks,

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Ghost delegates

2002-11-27 Thread Daniel Chenault
Nope, this particular little bugaboo has been around for a while.

-Original Message-
From: Wood, Harriet [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Ghost delegates


(Using exchange 5.5 on nt4 servers)

When users are deleted who were someone's delegate it generates system
undeliverables. I can't see a way of exporting delegate rights, is there any
way of sorting this apart from chasing down who gave the rights and getting
them to remove them? Yes you would think when delegates leave/change jobs
they would remove their rights but we are talking PHBs :-)

Harriet Wood

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Getting email addresses from Inbox

2002-11-27 Thread Daniel Chenault
Most anything is possible so long as you remember the engineer's byline:

Cheap, easy, fast
Pick two

-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Getting email addresses from Inbox


A user approached me and asked if there was a way he could get the email
addresses from all messages in his inbox.

I've never done anything programatically in OL, and I don't know if the
following is possible:
For Each message In Inbox
Get From: address
Add From: address to a text file
Next

This is in Outlook 2000.  Anyone point me to a good resource?

Thanks!





___
Chris Levis
Applied Geographics, Inc.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Exchange IMS Registry Info

2002-11-27 Thread Daniel Chenault
It's maintained within the directory and not directly accessible. It's
possible DAPI can get to it prorammatically.

-Original Message-
From: Bevilacqua.Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Mateo.Jose; Kiser.Joseph
Subject: Exchange IMS Registry Info


All - We are using an Exchange 5.5 IMS as an internal smarthost for
applications to generate SMTP mail.  We restrict these systems via IP
address under the CONNECTIONS\Specify by Host settings on the IMS.  However,
we cannot find this list of IPs anywhere in the registry.  Anyone know of a
way to get this info other than within the GUI of the IMS Connector
settings?

Thanks

Steve


*
The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or
taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email
in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can't delete email

2002-11-27 Thread Daniel Chenault
Anyone who has used OWA knows it can at times be painful. Hence my nickname
The Canadian Client.

Ow! Eh?

- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 2:17 PM
Subject: RE: Can't delete email


OhWaa
That's how they said it at MEC

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can't delete email


Does it show up in OWA?  And did you try deleting it through OWA?

Gèoff...



-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can't delete email



I have an email which one of my users received from Omaha Steaks which
cannot be deleted.Get an unknown error when trying to delete. I cannot
find the message on my Server, message tracking is turned on. Exchange 2000
sp3. Any ideas?

TIA

Raj


**
This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is

confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable
privileges, and may constitute non-public information.  This message is
intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not
the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately
notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete
this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution,
reproduction
of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking
of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
Thank you for your cooperation.

**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Exchange 5.0 and Multiple Logins

2002-11-26 Thread Daniel Chenault
One for the directory
One for the private store
One for the public store

One login to rule them all (directory)
one ring to bind them (private store)
One ring to bring them all (public store)
and in the darkness bind them (still on 5.0)

;)

-Original Message-
From: Mark Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.0 and Multiple Logins


We have Exchange 5.0.  When a user logs in, it appears (on the connection
info) that the users has logged in three times.   We noticed this when we
kept getting errors saying we had exceeded our user limit.  Does anyone have
any idea why the exchange server would log everyone in 3 times? 
Thanks in advance for the help!

Mark

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Upgrading from Exchange 5.5 to 2000

2002-11-26 Thread Daniel Chenault
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/55.asp

I'm going to go ahead and be nasty here. If you are not able to navigate to
the Microsoft Exchange website (real hard to figure out:
www.microsoft.com/exchange) and from there find the link that talks about
coexistence and deployment (IBID) then you have no business touching an
Exchange box, let alone being in charge of it.

-Original Message-
From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Upgrading from Exchange 5.5 to 2000


Can someone direct me to a good website or give me a detailed explanation
(if possible and have some extra time to kill) as to how I can upgrade my
Exchange 5.5 server to Exchange 2000? Ours is a single domain and nothing
extra-ordinary.  I do like to install Exchange 2000 on a new box and use
EXEMERGE to get all the mail boxes back in to the new box (???). Or what is
the best way to do this since most of you experts have completed this task
in your environment and I am looking for some good advice.  Please HELP! Any
advice is welcome!  

rama

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: POP3

2002-11-26 Thread Daniel Chenault
There are a lot of intervening devices between you and your users. If they
havne't change anything, and you havent' changed anything and we work on the
assumption that the software didn't reconfigure or rewrite itself overnite
than the only logical explanation is that something in-between changed. 

You didn't say if this was over the internet or internal to your network.

-Original Message-
From: Karvannan S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: POP3
Importance: High


Folks,

We are facing a very starnge problem in the Exchange 2k server with POP3.
People are connecting the server using Internet email settings thru outlook
 ooutlook express.

When try to download the mails from the server, it is saying timed out or
it just hangs for long time. All these suddenly happened without doing any
changes at the server end.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks  Regards,

SK


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Changing all contacts to plain text recipients

2002-11-26 Thread Daniel Chenault
Better yet set the SMTP server to never send RTF. Problem solved.

- Original Message -
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:59 PM
Subject: RE: Changing all contacts to plain text recipients


 And if you then set the user's Outlook client to always use the Plain Text
 mail format, doesn't that solve your problem?

 -Original Message-
 From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 2:37 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Changing all contacts to plain text recipients


 It sets it to let outlook decide.  Or at least that is what it is doing
on
 this machine.

 -Original Message-
 From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 5:20 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Changing all contacts to plain text recipients

 So if you turn around and reimport it then, with the setting not there,
does
 it set it to RTF by default...?

 -Original Message-
 From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 2:06 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Changing all contacts to plain text recipients


 Exporting the contact list doesn't export the RTF / Plain Text setting.


 Then Dale gave you the suggestion you want, although grammatically, he
 didn't give you the exact menu names...but read between the lines...
 
 While in Outlook, go to File -- Import  Export... -- Export to a
 file...
 -- Comma Seperated Values (DOS)
 
 Reimport them when you're done.



 The user's mail format is set to always use plain text but when he sends
 email to contacts it does send it in RTF

 Either that change your Luser's Mail Format so that the Luser always
 sends
 in plain text...then it won't matter what the recipient is set for...I
 think.

 -Original Message-
 From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 1:31 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Changing all contacts to plain text recipients


 He's running into this problem.

 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;278061

 Article 278061 in MS Knowledge Base

 The solution works but you have to make change for all contacts.

 Todd

 -Original Message-
 From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:22 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Changing all contacts to plain text recipients

 Do you mean that your user wants to change the format of the e-mail that
he
 sends to each contact?

 -Original Message-
 From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:41 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Changing all contacts to plain text recipients


 Is there anyway to change all contacts' internet format from rtf to plain
 text without having to change the properties of each individual one.

 I have a user who has 100's of contacts and wants to change them all to
 plain text.

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   

Re: Problems with Event ID 1023...

2002-11-26 Thread Daniel Chenault
Favorite folders maybe?

- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:10 PM
Subject: RE: Problems with Event ID 1023...


 Have the effected users create a new Outlook profile.

  -Original Message-
  From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 6:57 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
 
  Ok...here's the problem (It's kinda weird and I'm not sure
  I'm gonna explain this right, but here I go):
 
  1.  Exchange 5.5 SP4, Win2k SP2 server, NT 4.0 domain (our
  side), Exchange
  5.5 SP4, Win2k SP2 server, Win2k AD domain (their side).
 
  2.  On 07/01/2002, X number of mailboxes were deleted from
  our site in the org and added to the other site in the org.
  Due to the fact that they don't have Admin rights in our site
  and vice versa, I exported the contents of all the mailboxes
  that were moving to .pst files and put the files on a share.
  I then deleted the mailboxes from our site.  They recreated
  the mailboxes and imported the data into the new mailbox.
 
  3.  Ever since the following Monday, I have been getting the
  error messages below.  I don't just get one or two a day.
  For 10-15 ex-users per server
  (30-45 total) I get these messages ALL DAY long.  The
  messages start as soon as these people log into the other
  domain every morning.
 
  Event Type: Failure Audit
  Event Source: MSExchangeIS Private
  Event Category: Logons
  Event ID: 1023
  Date: 11/26/2002
  Time: 12:44:13 PM
  User: N/A
  Computer: ERCEXCHANGE
  Description:
  HANFORD\hxxx was validated as
  /o=HANFORD/ou=HANFORD/cn=Recipients/cn=hxxx but was
  unable to log on to /o=HANFORD/ou=ERC/cn=Recipients/cn=JoeUser.
 
  4.  In the error message above, hxxx is their domain
  logon name as well as the primary account associated with the
  mailbox on their side.  They use an 8-digit alphanumeric
  number to guarantee that everyone that has ever worked on
  this job location (all way back to the '40's) has a unique ID number.
 
  5.  We have our own domain as well and exist as a site within
  their mail org.  For our network accounts, we use an
  eight-character alphanumeric login name as well, but with a
  different naming convention.  So...we associate the mailbox
  in this site with our domain logon names.  However, when we
  create the mailbox, in the optional attributes, there is one
  called employee-number.  Both sites populate this field with
  the hxxx number when the account is created.
 
  6.  Now...this is where it starts to get complicated.
  Someone on their side has a C++ service that runs once a
  night against the GAL.  The service logs into Exchange,
  extracts the hxxx number from the employee-number field
  and compares that against PeopleCore.  If there are no dupes,
  it then grabs all the organizational/location data for that
  employee and updates the record in Exchange, which then
  replicates back to our site.  If there are dupes, it kicks
  out an error message to the appropriate site admin, saying,
  Go fix it stupid!
 
  7.  Okay...I have verified that for each hxxx logon name
  that is logging into their domain and getting an error in our
  server logs, that this is the same employee-number that was
  associated with the mailbox when it was on our side.
 
  8.  I have found the following information on Technet, but
  I'm not running Mailbox Manager, I'm not running MBClean and
  I have no problems starting the Exchange Event or Internet
  Message Services.
  Q188594 -
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;188594
  Q237481 -
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;237481
  Q306308 -
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;306308
  Q158028 -
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;158028
  - This may apply...I don't know if their Outlook profiles were deleted
and
 recreated after moving from one domain to the other.
 Q259578 -
 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;259578

 Don't even try Precht...I've already been to EventID.net and what I found
 doesn't fit my situation:

http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1023source=MSExchangeIS+Private

 TIA folks,

 James H (Jim) Blunt
 Network / Exchange Administrator
 Network Infrastructure Group
 Bechtel Hanford, Inc. (BHI)
 Office: 509-372-9188
 TextMessage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: 

RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
Outlook XP? Tools:Settings:Mail Setup:Send/Receive. Several options there
for you.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Yes I am.  They are offline users.  They are remote users that are paid by
the hour.  We are trying to find a way to make it automated so they only
have to hook their laptops up to the phone line and go to bed.  

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

You must mean remote users working in offline mode, right? 

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 5:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


So that users don't have to initiate the send/receive.  Currently it takes
user intervention to perform the function and we are looking for a way to
automate it.

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 4:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

What is the design goal?


 -Original Message-
 From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 3:54 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Does anyone know of a command switch for Outlook.exe in Outlook XP 
 that I could create a scheduled task that would open Outlook and 
 perform a Send/Receive and then close Outlook?  Or is there any third 
 party software that would do this.  Remember this is Outlook XP and 
 the security is different.
 
 Thank you,
  
 Alex Gonzalez
 Senior Systems Administrator
 Handleman Company
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
How do you know they aren't charging time for that anyway? They're on the
honor system by definition.

Have them use an OST. Automatic synch and they're not just staring at a
screen waiting. Note there is the option for an automatic send/receive every
X minutes. This will dial the number automagically and do it's thing without
them sitting there. All they have to do is start Outlook and walk away.


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


There are options there but not to automatically open Outlook.  We need
something that I could setup through task scheduler that will open Outlook
and perform a send/receive and then close Outlook. Like I said in a previous
post.  These are hourly employees that we don't want to pay while they are
just sitting there waiting for their email to download.

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

Outlook XP? Tools:Settings:Mail Setup:Send/Receive. Several options there
for you.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Yes I am.  They are offline users.  They are remote users that are paid by
the hour.  We are trying to find a way to make it automated so they only
have to hook their laptops up to the phone line and go to bed.  

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

You must mean remote users working in offline mode, right? 

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 5:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


So that users don't have to initiate the send/receive.  Currently it takes
user intervention to perform the function and we are looking for a way to
automate it.

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 4:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

What is the design goal?


 -Original Message-
 From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 3:54 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Does anyone know of a command switch for Outlook.exe in Outlook XP
 that I could create a scheduled task that would open Outlook and 
 perform a Send/Receive and then close Outlook?  Or is there any third 
 party software that would do this.  Remember this is Outlook XP and 
 the security is different.
 
 Thank you,
  
 Alex Gonzalez
 Senior Systems Administrator
 Handleman Company
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp

RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
g

What Chris is saying in his typical abrasive way is that so far it looks
like you are attempting to create a technical solution to address a
non-technical problem.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


I wasn't trying to be funny. If you'd ever get around to asking a proper
technical question then I'd answer it. Until then, I'm just trying to
understand what the fsck the actual requirements are.
  
 -Original Message-
 From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 10:12 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Ha ha!!!
 
 Thank you,
  
 Alex Gonzalez
 Senior Systems Administrator
 Handleman Company
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 10:46 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Do they have an application which reads the e-mail to them in
 their sleep?
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 8:15 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  Yes I am.  They are offline users.  They are remote users that are
  paid by the hour.  We are trying to find a way to make it 
 automated so
  they only have to hook their laptops up to the phone line and go to
  bed.
  
  Thank you,
   
  Alex Gonzalez
  Senior Systems Administrator
  Handleman Company
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 12:01 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  You must mean remote users working in offline mode, right?
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 5:57 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for
 Send/Recieve on
  OXP
  
  
  So that users don't have to initiate the send/receive. Currently it
  takes user intervention to perform the function and we are 
 looking for
  a way to automate it.
  
  Thank you,
   
  Alex Gonzalez
  Senior Systems Administrator
  Handleman Company
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 4:52 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  What is the design goal?
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 3:54 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   
   Does anyone know of a command switch for Outlook.exe in
 Outlook XP
   that I could create a scheduled task that would open Outlook and
   perform a Send/Receive and then close Outlook?  Or is there any 
   third party software that would do this.  Remember this 
 is Outlook
   XP and the security is different.
   
   Thank you,
    
   Alex Gonzalez
   Senior Systems Administrator
   Handleman Company
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: DL Export question

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
What is about this one DL that is different from the others?


-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DL Export question


I am trying to export using a csv file to gather DL information...it works
fine until I add the SMTP field, it actually works until it goes through
about 100 DLs but always stops on one particular DL.  Any idea of what can
make it stop, or how to identify what the problem  is?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
;)

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Bite me. I said no such thing. What you said my very well be true, but it's
not what I said.

 -Original Message-
 From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:03 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 g
 
 What Chris is saying in his typical abrasive way is that so
 far it looks like you are attempting to create a technical 
 solution to address a non-technical problem.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 10:54 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for
 Send/Recieve on OXP
 
 
 I wasn't trying to be funny. If you'd ever get around to
 asking a proper
 technical question then I'd answer it. Until then, I'm just trying to
 understand what the fsck the actual requirements are.
   
  -Original Message-
  From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 10:12 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  Ha ha!!!
  
  Thank you,
   
  Alex Gonzalez
  Senior Systems Administrator
  Handleman Company
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 10:46 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  Do they have an application which reads the e-mail to them in their 
  sleep?
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 8:15 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   
   Yes I am.  They are offline users.  They are remote users that are 
   paid by the hour.  We are trying to find a way to make it
  automated so
   they only have to hook their laptops up to the phone line
 and go to
   bed.
   
   Thank you,

   Alex Gonzalez
   Senior Systems Administrator
   Handleman Company
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 12:01 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   
   You must mean remote users working in offline mode, right?
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 5:57 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for
  Send/Recieve on
   OXP
   
   
   So that users don't have to initiate the send/receive.
 Currently it
   takes user intervention to perform the function and we are
  looking for
   a way to automate it.
   
   Thank you,

   Alex Gonzalez
   Senior Systems Administrator
   Handleman Company
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 4:52 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   
   What is the design goal?
   
   
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 3:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Does anyone know of a command switch for Outlook.exe in
  Outlook XP
that I could create a scheduled task that would open Outlook and 
perform a Send/Receive and then close Outlook?  Or is there any 
third party software that would do this.  Remember this
  is Outlook
XP and the security is different.

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
He said in another message that there are remote users (using Outlook in
remote offline mode, but apparently not synching to an OST). The company
does not want to pay them to download mail; they want a way to
programmatically start Outlook, force it to download mail and then shut
down. That is what prompted Chris' remark about reading mail to them in
their sleep.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Well, 287677 might work as well depending on what the actual problem to be
solved is, but apparently this isn't the week for properly phrased technical
questions. 
  
 -Original Message-
 From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:45 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 If I had that, I would have noticed that he wants a scheduled
 execution of the F5 key, and would have kept my mouth shut.  
 Or perhaps suggested using the sendkeys thingy off the 
 resource kit (win2000 i think).
 
 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q259103
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At:
 Monday, November 25, 2002 11:34 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
 Conversation: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for 
 Send/Recieve on OXP
 Subject: Re: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for 
 Send/Recieve on OXP
 
 
 I did, however, ask Santa for the thingy that will read email
 to me in my sleep.
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:31 PM
 Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for
 Send/Recieve on OXP
 
 
 I think once the guy post the actual problem he's trying to
 solve, rather than his non-solution to it, it will become 
 clear that either BLAT or MAPISEND will solve the problem.  
 But who knows, since he won't give any details.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
That is the perfect description for an environment where Outlook is setup to
use an OST in offline mode. And the s/r frequency is configurable.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Because we don't want people dialing up more than once.  We have about 800
users and only 40 lines.  If I use Outlook it will dial ever X minutes.
Also people travel with these laptops and use outlook while they are not
connected to a phone line.  I don't want Outlook trying to perform a sr all
day long while people are trying to work.  We are also using custom forms in
Outlook so its pretty much open all day while they are working and
disconnected.

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

Why not leave outlook open and use the accounts tab to schedule send and
receives.

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 5:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


So that users don't have to initiate the send/receive.  Currently it takes
user intervention to perform the function and we are looking for a way to
automate it.

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 4:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

What is the design goal?


 -Original Message-
 From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 3:54 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Does anyone know of a command switch for Outlook.exe in Outlook XP 
 that I could create a scheduled task that would open Outlook and 
 perform a Send/Receive and then close Outlook?  Or is there any third 
 party software that would do this.  Remember this is Outlook XP and 
 the security is different.
 
 Thank you,
  
 Alex Gonzalez
 Senior Systems Administrator
 Handleman Company
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
Limit their logon hours to the wee hours. They can dial-up all they want,
they'll get punted outside those hours. You can stagger the hours and tell
them what their window is. 

There is no such command switch as you seek. There is the option to s/r on
startup and scheduling OL to startup on a schedule is easy using the Windows
Task Scheduler (or any of a number of similar 3rd-party tools).

As for Chris et al: after years on this list we (collectively) have found
that a lot of people will post here wanting validation for their solution
when oftimes if we know the actual problem we can come up with a better
solution. We don't' want to waste time, yours or ours, making a half-assed
solution work when a better alternative is available. Thus the request for
more info.

Now... How many users are we talking about for these forty lines? Do any of
them have broadband at their location? Perhaps you may want to research the
cost-effectiveness of paying their broadband bill (maybe half of it?) to
ease the strain on the phone lines. 

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Your being a total jerk about this question.  I don't see what isn't
technical about this question.  It wasn't a question of what our people do,
its how to automate our systems so they don't have to do as much manual work
and bill for it. Daniel Chenault hit the nail on the head. It is creating a
technical solution for a non technical problem.  Isn't that what technology
does?  I apologize if I didn't give enough detail. These users are all on
dialup and receive large emails with large attachments (pictures mainly) all
day.  When they go to synchronize their inbox it can take up to 2 hours for
all the mail to download.  The company doesn't want them billing for the
time it takes to sit in front of their laptops waiting for it to download.
They would rather schedule it at night and just have the rep read it while
they are in the field the next day.  As far as the question goes here is a
refresher:

Does anyone know of a command switch for Outlook.exe in Outlook XP that I
could create a scheduled task that would open Outlook and perform a
Send/Receive and then close Outlook?  Or is there any third party software
that would do this.  Remember this is Outlook XP and the security is
different.

All you had to do was post back if you knew something.  You don't have to be
rude about it.  Whether the user is awake or asleep is irrelevant all I
needed to know is if you knew of anything.  Maybe you don't know what a
command switch is?  I don't know.  All I am looking for is something like
Outlook /sendreceive (obviously that isn't it or I wouldn't be posting
this), so that I could put the switch in the scheduled task to run
Outlook.exe, setup Outlook to dial if there is no connection, run a
send/receive, and be done with it.  Or if there was a
third party app that would do this for me.   

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Well, 287677 might work as well depending on what the actual problem to be
solved is, but apparently this isn't the week for properly phrased technical
questions. 
  
 -Original Message-
 From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:45 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 If I had that, I would have noticed that he wants a scheduled
 execution of the F5 key, and would have kept my mouth shut.  
 Or perhaps suggested using the sendkeys thingy off the 
 resource kit (win2000 i think).
 
 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q259103
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At:
 Monday, November 25, 2002 11:34 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
 Conversation: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for 
 Send/Recieve on OXP
 Subject: Re: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for 
 Send/Recieve on OXP
 
 
 I did, however, ask Santa for the thingy that will read email
 to me in my sleep.
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:31 PM
 Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for
 Send/Recieve on OXP
 
 
 I think once the guy post the actual problem he's trying to
 solve, rather than his non-solution to it, it will become 
 clear that either BLAT or MAPISEND will solve the problem.  
 But who knows, since he won't give any details.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
Damn, you've got a full-time job there. Does it pay well?

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Oh no my only purpose now is to sit on this list and point out every time
you're an ass to everyone. Good thing you don't keep me waiting long

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Still waiting for you to provide a shining example of how I ought to be
doing it by tackling all of those hard technical questions with gusto and
aplomb. But as usual it seems you're much more inclined to engage in silly
banter or name calling.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:13 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Wow.Chris being a total jerk again. Come on tell me something new 
 :)
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, 
 Alex
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:07 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for
 Send/Recieve on OXP
 
 
 Your being a total jerk about this question.  I don't see what isn't 
 technical about this question.  It wasn't a question of what our 
 people do, its how to automate our systems so they don't have to do as 
 much manual work and bill for it. Daniel Chenault hit the nail on the 
 head. It is creating a technical solution for a non technical
 problem.  Isn't that what technology does?  I apologize if I 
 didn't give enough detail.
 These users are all on dialup and receive large emails with 
 large attachments (pictures mainly) all day.  When they go to 
 synchronize their inbox it can take up to 2 hours for all the 
 mail to download.  The company doesn't want them billing for 
 the time it takes to sit in front of their laptops waiting 
 for it to download.  They would rather schedule it at night 
 and just have the rep read it while they are in the field the 
 next day.  As far as the question goes here is a refresher:
 
 Does anyone know of a command switch for Outlook.exe in Outlook XP 
 that I could create a scheduled task that would open Outlook and 
 perform a Send/Receive and then close Outlook?  Or is there any third 
 party software that would do this.  Remember this is Outlook XP and 
 the security is different.
 
 All you had to do was post back if you knew something.  You don't have 
 to be rude about it.  Whether the user is awake or asleep is 
 irrelevant all I needed to know is if you knew of anything.  Maybe you 
 don't know what a command switch is?  I don't know.  All I am looking 
 for is something like Outlook /sendreceive (obviously that isn't it 
 or I wouldn't be posting this), so that I could put the switch in the
 scheduled task to run Outlook.exe, setup Outlook to dial if 
 there is no connection, run a send/receive, and be done with 
 it.  Or if there was a
 third party app that would do this for me.   
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:51 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Well, 287677 might work as well depending on what the actual problem 
 to be solved is, but apparently this isn't the week for properly 
 phrased technical questions.
   
  -Original Message-
  From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:45 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  If I had that, I would have noticed that he wants a scheduled 
  execution of the F5 key, and would have kept my mouth shut. Or 
  perhaps suggested using the sendkeys thingy off the resource kit 
  (win2000 i think).
  
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q259103
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday,

  November 25, 2002 11:34 AM Posted To: MSExchange
 Mailing List
  Conversation: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for
 Send/Recieve on
  OXP
  Subject: Re: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for
 Send/Recieve on
  OXP
  
  
  I did, however, ask Santa for the thingy that will read
 email to me in
  my sleep.
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:31 PM
  Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for
 Send/Recieve on
  OXP
  
  
  I think once the guy post the actual problem he's trying to solve, 
  rather than his non-solution to it, it will become clear
 that either
  BLAT or MAPISEND will solve the problem.
  But who knows, since he won't give any details

RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
thinking outside the box

What is this 2M file? Does it have to be 2M? Is it generic for all users,
specific to a region, specific to one user? Specific to one store, group of
stores, or what? There may be another way to do this.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Both.  Home offices all over the place.  We are a music distributor. These
people are the ones that stock the shelves at your local Kmart or Walmart
with music.  They are in the store all day long stocking shelves so they
don't have connectivity. 

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Who sends them all this stuff? Is it the home office, or is it a number of
people all over the place?


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Actually they don't check their email all day.  They just download the days
mail and read that till the next day.  We are trying to implement wireless
cards so that they can always check mail.  Right now its too inconsistent
for our reps.  They stock CD's at stores and there is too much RF in many
for it to work.  Plus there isn't enough 3G coverage yet nationally.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Lets see 800 users 40 incoming lines. Assume each person checks his email 8
times a day and stays on for 20 minutes. Twenty people per line. There are
3600 minutes in a day. Eight accesses, times twenty people, times 20 minutes
per call comes out to 3200. Wow I would like to see that phone bill.



- Original Message - 
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


 Still waiting for you to provide a shining example of how I ought to
be
 doing it by tackling all of those hard technical questions with gusto
and
 aplomb. But as usual it seems you're much more inclined to engage in
silly
 banter or name calling.

  -Original Message-
  From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:13 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
 
  Wow.Chris being a total jerk again. Come on tell me something
  new :)
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gonzalez,
  Alex
  Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:07 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve 
  on OXP
 
 
  Your being a total jerk about this question.  I don't see what isn't

  technical about this question.  It wasn't a question of what our
  people do, its how to automate our systems so they don't have to do 
  as much manual work and bill for it. Daniel Chenault hit the nail on

  the head. It is creating a technical solution for a non technical 
  problem.  Isn't that what technology does?  I apologize if I didn't 
  give enough detail. These users are all on dialup and receive large 
  emails with large attachments (pictures mainly) all day.  When they 
  go to synchronize their inbox it can take up to 2 hours for all the
  mail to download.  The company doesn't want them billing for
  the time it takes to sit in front of their laptops waiting
  for it to download.  They would rather schedule it at night
  and just have the rep read it while they are in the field the
  next day.  As far as the question goes here is a refresher:
 
  Does anyone know of a command switch for Outlook.exe in Outlook XP
  that I could create a scheduled task that would open Outlook and 
  perform a Send/Receive and then close Outlook?  Or is there any 
  third party software that would do this.  Remember this is Outlook 
  XP and the security is different.
 
  All you had to do was post back if you knew something.  You don't
  have to be rude about it.  Whether the user is awake or asleep is 
  irrelevant all I needed to know is if you knew of anything.  Maybe 
  you don't know what a command switch is?  I don't know.  All I am 
  looking for is something like Outlook /sendreceive (obviously that

  isn't it or I wouldn't be posting this), so that I could put the
  switch in the scheduled task to run Outlook.exe, setup Outlook to 
  dial if there is no connection, run a send/receive, and be done with
  it.  Or if there was a
  third party app that would do this for me.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris

RE: DL Export question

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
How are you adding the SMTP field? What, exactly, are you typing the CSV
header file?

-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Export question


Actually its not just the SMTP field that makes it stop on that DL, it
worked when I did Directory and alias name only, but when I try to add other
fields it fails...always on that one DL.  

I don't see anything different about this one than others.  

Where is the log file?  I looked at the eventvwr on the server but there was
nothing there.


-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DL Export question

I am trying to export using a csv file to gather DL information...it works
fine until I add the SMTP field, it actually works until it goes through
about 100 DLs but always stops on one particular DL.  Any idea of what can
make it stop, or how to identify what the problem  is?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
They should be in .jpg format and no larger than 20K. As an example: the
picture of my truck at http://web.nova1.net/danielc/bustinout.htm is only
26K and it still looks good. There are utilities out there that can do batch
compression of a whole folder of such pictures. Note: zipping .jpg files is
not only useless but can make them larger.

Why not ftp?

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Well its mainly pictures of what displays are going to be in the store. Some
of these files used to be Gig sized but our advertising department has
shrunk them down quite a bit.


-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

thinking outside the box

What is this 2M file? Does it have to be 2M? Is it generic for all users,
specific to a region, specific to one user? Specific to one store, group of
stores, or what? There may be another way to do this.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Both.  Home offices all over the place.  We are a music distributor. These
people are the ones that stock the shelves at your local Kmart or Walmart
with music.  They are in the store all day long stocking shelves so they
don't have connectivity. 

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Who sends them all this stuff? Is it the home office, or is it a number of
people all over the place?


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Actually they don't check their email all day.  They just download the days
mail and read that till the next day.  We are trying to implement wireless
cards so that they can always check mail.  Right now its too inconsistent
for our reps.  They stock CD's at stores and there is too much RF in many
for it to work.  Plus there isn't enough 3G coverage yet nationally.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Lets see 800 users 40 incoming lines. Assume each person checks his email 8
times a day and stays on for 20 minutes. Twenty people per line. There are
3600 minutes in a day. Eight accesses, times twenty people, times 20 minutes
per call comes out to 3200. Wow I would like to see that phone bill.



- Original Message - 
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


 Still waiting for you to provide a shining example of how I ought to
be
 doing it by tackling all of those hard technical questions with gusto
and
 aplomb. But as usual it seems you're much more inclined to engage in
silly
 banter or name calling.

  -Original Message-
  From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:13 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
 
  Wow.Chris being a total jerk again. Come on tell me something 
  new :)
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, 
  Alex
  Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:07 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve
  on OXP
 
 
  Your being a total jerk about this question.  I don't see what isn't

  technical about this question.  It wasn't a question of what our 
  people do, its how to automate our systems so they don't have to do 
  as much manual work and bill for it. Daniel Chenault hit the nail on

  the head. It is creating a technical solution for a non technical
  problem.  Isn't that what technology does?  I apologize if I didn't 
  give enough detail. These users are all on dialup and receive large 
  emails with large attachments (pictures mainly) all day.  When they 
  go to synchronize their inbox it can take up to 2 hours for all the
  mail to download.  The company doesn't want them billing for
  the time it takes to sit in front of their laptops waiting
  for it to download.  They would rather schedule it at night
  and just have the rep read it while they are in the field the
  next day.  As far as the question goes here is a refresher:
 
  Does anyone know of a command switch for Outlook.exe in Outlook XP 
  that I

RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
That and that there is an alternative. Two that I can think of:
1. ftp
2. website

Both would be accessible via the internet, thus no tying up the dial-up
lines. The field reps would have to provide their own internet connectivity
(which is really cheap these days).

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


I guess the point is that if they are sending these massive images and all
they are doing is printing a comp on an ink jet to show the store manager,
the problem isn't an email or bandwidth issue at all, but rather a user
issue with the imaging folk. They need to be taught these people don't need
these massive files. 

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Honestly Martin I have no idea.  I think they print them off and show them
to the store manager.  I don't really know everything those people do.

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

What does the receiver do with these images? Are they sent to a printer, or
are they just FYI, or what?


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Well its mainly pictures of what displays are going to be in the store. Some
of these files used to be Gig sized but our advertising department has
shrunk them down quite a bit.


-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

thinking outside the box

What is this 2M file? Does it have to be 2M? Is it generic for all users,
specific to a region, specific to one user? Specific to one store, group of
stores, or what? There may be another way to do this.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Both.  Home offices all over the place.  We are a music distributor. These
people are the ones that stock the shelves at your local Kmart or Walmart
with music.  They are in the store all day long stocking shelves so they
don't have connectivity. 

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Who sends them all this stuff? Is it the home office, or is it a number of
people all over the place?


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Actually they don't check their email all day.  They just download the days
mail and read that till the next day.  We are trying to implement wireless
cards so that they can always check mail.  Right now its too inconsistent
for our reps.  They stock CD's at stores and there is too much RF in many
for it to work.  Plus there isn't enough 3G coverage yet nationally.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Lets see 800 users 40 incoming lines. Assume each person checks his email 8
times a day and stays on for 20 minutes. Twenty people per line. There are
3600 minutes in a day. Eight accesses, times twenty people, times 20 minutes
per call comes out to 3200. Wow I would like to see that phone bill.



- Original Message - 
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


 Still waiting for you to provide a shining example of how I ought to
be
 doing it by tackling all of those hard technical questions with gusto
and
 aplomb. But as usual it seems you're much more inclined to engage in
silly
 banter or name calling.

  -Original Message-
  From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:13 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
 
  Wow.Chris being a total jerk again. Come on tell me something 
  new :)
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gonzalez

RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
Well... Uh...how can I say this without being seen as rude or flaming?
Hmm... Well, there is no way to say it.

You are the _Senior_ Systems Administrator. Take control. Are you not
responsible for the efficient and continued operation of this network? Can
you not make a successful argument that misuse of it costs the company
money, both real and in lost availability?

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


That my friend is a long standing battle.  We have people that think its ok
to send out 30meg files to these people. 

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

I guess the point is that if they are sending these massive images and all
they are doing is printing a comp on an ink jet to show the store manager,
the problem isn't an email or bandwidth issue at all, but rather a user
issue with the imaging folk. They need to be taught these people don't need
these massive files. 

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Honestly Martin I have no idea.  I think they print them off and show them
to the store manager.  I don't really know everything those people do.

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

What does the receiver do with these images? Are they sent to a printer, or
are they just FYI, or what?


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Well its mainly pictures of what displays are going to be in the store. Some
of these files used to be Gig sized but our advertising department has
shrunk them down quite a bit.


-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

thinking outside the box

What is this 2M file? Does it have to be 2M? Is it generic for all users,
specific to a region, specific to one user? Specific to one store, group of
stores, or what? There may be another way to do this.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Both.  Home offices all over the place.  We are a music distributor. These
people are the ones that stock the shelves at your local Kmart or Walmart
with music.  They are in the store all day long stocking shelves so they
don't have connectivity. 

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Who sends them all this stuff? Is it the home office, or is it a number of
people all over the place?


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Actually they don't check their email all day.  They just download the days
mail and read that till the next day.  We are trying to implement wireless
cards so that they can always check mail.  Right now its too inconsistent
for our reps.  They stock CD's at stores and there is too much RF in many
for it to work.  Plus there isn't enough 3G coverage yet nationally.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Lets see 800 users 40 incoming lines. Assume each person checks his email 8
times a day and stays on for 20 minutes. Twenty people per line. There are
3600 minutes in a day. Eight accesses, times twenty people, times 20 minutes
per call comes out to 3200. Wow I would like to see that phone bill.



- Original Message - 
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


 Still waiting for you to provide a shining example of how I ought to
be
 doing it by tackling all of those hard

RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
Holy crap.

As I said before, searching for a technical solution to a non-technical
problem. Let the field reps drop the pics into a PPT themselves. Takes 20
seconds.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


I agree.  To top it off they put everything in Powerpoint presentations and
send  them out too.

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Well then there needs to be some kind of meeting of the minds. Obviously you
cant support your email users in the current environment (I don't mean this
in a bad way). This discussion proves it. 
The company doesn't want to spend any money, they don't want the users to
have to wait for their mail, etc, etc. The ONLY solutions are to do
something non email related, OR reduce those image sizes.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


That my friend is a long standing battle.  We have people that think its ok
to send out 30meg files to these people. 

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

I guess the point is that if they are sending these massive images and all
they are doing is printing a comp on an ink jet to show the store manager,
the problem isn't an email or bandwidth issue at all, but rather a user
issue with the imaging folk. They need to be taught these people don't need
these massive files. 

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Honestly Martin I have no idea.  I think they print them off and show them
to the store manager.  I don't really know everything those people do.

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

What does the receiver do with these images? Are they sent to a printer, or
are they just FYI, or what?


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Well its mainly pictures of what displays are going to be in the store. Some
of these files used to be Gig sized but our advertising department has
shrunk them down quite a bit.


-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

thinking outside the box

What is this 2M file? Does it have to be 2M? Is it generic for all users,
specific to a region, specific to one user? Specific to one store, group of
stores, or what? There may be another way to do this.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Both.  Home offices all over the place.  We are a music distributor. These
people are the ones that stock the shelves at your local Kmart or Walmart
with music.  They are in the store all day long stocking shelves so they
don't have connectivity. 

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Who sends them all this stuff? Is it the home office, or is it a number of
people all over the place?


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Actually they don't check their email all day.  They just download the days
mail and read that till the next day.  We are trying to implement wireless
cards so that they can always check mail.  Right now its too inconsistent
for our reps.  They stock CD's at stores and there is too much RF in many
for it to work.  Plus there isn't enough 3G coverage yet nationally

RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
Well, they don't have to be technically literate. They have to be able to
follow directions. If I hire a guy to work on my car I don't care if he
knows how to machine a head out of a solid block of metal.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Yea that's true but we don't work with the most technically literate people.


Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

They can synchronize the webpages for offline access.  Internet Explorer
|
Tools | Synchronize.

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
  
  
 -Original Message-
 From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:11 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Well that would work except they can't always get access to a
 phone line in the store.  
 
 Thank you,
  
 Alex Gonzalez
 Senior Systems Administrator
 Handleman Company
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:07 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 I was thinking the same thing. Particularly a website. You
 could even email the links to a web server 
 Htpp://servername/newhootersmagazinecover.jpg
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:05 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for
 Send/Recieve on OXP
 
 
 That and that there is an alternative. Two that I can think of: 1. ftp 
 2. website
 
 Both would be accessible via the internet, thus no tying up
 the dial-up
 lines. The field reps would have to provide their own internet
 connectivity
 (which is really cheap these days).
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:59 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on
 OXP
 
 
 I guess the point is that if they are sending these massive images and 
 all they are doing is printing a comp on an ink jet to show the store
 manager,
 the problem isn't an email or bandwidth issue at all, but 
 rather a user
 issue with the imaging folk. They need to be taught these people don't
 need
 these massive files. 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:58 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on
 OXP
 
 
 Honestly Martin I have no idea.  I think they print them off and show 
 them to the store manager.  I don't really know everything those 
 people do.
 
 Thank you,
  
 Alex Gonzalez
 Senior Systems Administrator
 Handleman Company
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:52 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 What does the receiver do with these images? Are they sent to
 a printer,
 or
 are they just FYI, or what?
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:46 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on
 OXP
 
 
 Well its mainly pictures of what displays are going to be in
 the store.
 Some
 of these files used to be Gig sized but our advertising department has
 shrunk them down quite a bit.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:41 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 thinking outside the box
 
 What is this 2M file? Does it have to be 2M? Is it generic for all 
 users, specific to a region, specific to one user? Specific to one
 store, group
 of
 stores, or what? There may be another way to do this.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:38 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on
 OXP
 
 
 Both.  Home offices all over the place.  We are a music distributor. 
 These people are the ones that stock the shelves at your local Kmart 
 or Walmart
 with music.  They are in the store all day long stocking 
 shelves so they
 don't have connectivity. 
 
 Thank you,
  
 Alex Gonzalez
 Senior Systems Administrator
 Handleman Company
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday

RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
Again...

Lesee.. What was the phrase Ed coined? There are no technological solutions
for behavior problems?

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Those don't go out via IT people they go through merchandiser that don't
realize the impact because they can send them to joe schmo next to them
quickly so why not dialup users.  

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Ok... This isn't an email problem anymore.  Go back to your bosses and tell
them that this is an IT infrastructure issue, and it cannot be fixed by
setting outlook to dial in at 2 am.

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


I agree.  To top it off they put everything in Powerpoint presentations and
send  them out too.

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Well then there needs to be some kind of meeting of the minds. Obviously you
cant support your email users in the current environment (I don't mean this
in a bad way). This discussion proves it. 
The company doesn't want to spend any money, they don't want the users to
have to wait for their mail, etc, etc. The ONLY solutions are to do
something non email related, OR reduce those image sizes.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


That my friend is a long standing battle.  We have people that think its ok
to send out 30meg files to these people. 

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: DL Export question

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
Dare I ask?

What is the point of this exercise?

-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Export question


That still does not make it very viewable, the DN's are all jumbled together
and some of the DL's have thousands of recipients.  I have written a batch
file using the output of ONDL.exe that works great for DL's that aren't
hidden, but ONDL does not work for hidden DL's.


-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: DL Export question

Then use Access to view the results.

- Original Message -
From: Hatley, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:14 PM
Subject: RE: DL Export question



 Thanks, yeah I changed the logging to high and that seems to get rid 
 of at least some of the issues, I got the email address to export by 
 doing that and now I am trying to get members.  I sure wish there was 
 a better way to view the members though...has anyone written a script 
 or anything to
better
 format the DNs for members of a DL export?  Excel's 65000 limitation 
 is going to hinder the results.

 -Original Message-
 From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:09 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: DL Export question


 First of all when you do the export set the logging level to high. 
 Also
make
 sure that the you are logged in as for example the exchange service
account
 so you are sure you can read all the data. The events are recorded in 
 the application log on the computer that you are running exchange
administrator
 on. Hopefully this helps a little.

 -Patrick

 -Original Message-
 From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:06 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: DL Export question


 Actually its not just the SMTP field that makes it stop on that DL, it 
 worked when I did Directory and alias name only, but when I try to add
other
 fields it fails...always on that one DL.

 I don't see anything different about this one than others.

 Where is the log file?  I looked at the eventvwr on the server but 
 there
was
 nothing there.


 -Original Message-
 From: Hatley, Ken
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:56 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: DL Export question

 I am trying to export using a csv file to gather DL information...it 
 works fine until I add the SMTP field, it actually works until it goes 
 through about 100 DLs but always stops on one particular DL.  Any idea 
 of what can make it stop, or how to identify what the problem  is?

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
I understand how that can be. In addition to the many suggestions offered,
here's soemthing you can do that will serve you in the long run:

When you make recommendations to do this, that or the other always, and I
mean _always_, attach a monetary figure to it. Show how much the current
operations costs. Then use numbers to show how much an idea can save or cost
more. That is the only thing that ducks respond to. I can almost guarantee
that if you do this you will find much greater success in pushing through
your ideas. 

For example: you are currently paying, what was it... $18/month/line? That's
40*18=$720/month for the phone lines. Do the math to show how many phone
lines are needed to accomplish the task of downloading all these images
(sounds like they are the same images, for the most part, to all users in
all regions). They already know this, but it needs to be there in writing
for the next part to work.

Address the issue of the commandline switch. It doesn't exist. That's a
deadend alley. Back to square one.

Show how the merchandising department, with less than half-a-day of training
(again, show the math), can reduce the size of the attachments both by
reducing the JPG files (numerous utilities to do this, quite reasonable in
price, like under twenty bucks) and not use Powerpoint to send them. Let the
reps do it (it's really simple).

Then explore the alternatives you've been given. One of the best and most
cost-effective ways is to setup a VPN server. Let the field users supply
their own internet connection (www.ev1.net is $9.99/month for dial-up, may
be something similar in other areas around the country). Do away with the
800 number and voila, an instant savings of 720/month. The reps can write
off the cost of the connection on their taxes, you no longer support a bank
of modems and you're using free software (IIS, ftp and VPN are all built-in
to WindowsNT and 2K) to accomplish the tast in an efficient and
_cost-effective_ manner.

NB: ducks is an inside joke. It refers to managers, especially the ones that
live and die by the spreadsheet. Comes from an idea of being pecked to death
by ducks. You have to speak their language (Quack!) or you're just the
whiney IT guy.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Its because the people that are between me and the CIO are wimps. Sorry. If
I had it my way a lot of things would be different here. I make plenty of
arguments they just ignore me.  But think of the job Market and how weak it
is for us right now.

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator (unfotunatly)
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Well... Uh...how can I say this without being seen as rude or flaming?
Hmm... Well, there is no way to say it.

You are the _Senior_ Systems Administrator. Take control. Are you not
responsible for the efficient and continued operation of this network? Can
you not make a successful argument that misuse of it costs the company
money, both real and in lost availability?

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


That my friend is a long standing battle.  We have people that think its ok
to send out 30meg files to these people. 

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

I guess the point is that if they are sending these massive images and all
they are doing is printing a comp on an ink jet to show the store manager,
the problem isn't an email or bandwidth issue at all, but rather a user
issue with the imaging folk. They need to be taught these people don't need
these massive files. 

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Honestly Martin I have no idea.  I think they print them off and show them
to the store manager.  I don't really know everything those people do.

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

What does the receiver do with these images? Are they sent to a printer, or
are they just FYI, or what

RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
Lawyers ARE bad, they are just of a different flavor and texture.

-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Doncha just love navigating the corporate waters?  What a hassle...and I
thought lawyers were bad.

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
  
  
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:38 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Quack!
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:40 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for
 Send/Recieve on OXP
 
 
 Maybe you can try to convene a meeting with him and the links
 in between? Or
 maybe you can present your idea to your boss and make it seem 
 like it was
 his idea. (Hey boss, do you think it would work if we put all those
 graphics files on an secured web page that our remote users could just
 synchronize in the off hours?)  Then he can be a hero 
 without having to do
 any actual thinking. :)
 
 -Ben-
 Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
 Director of Information Services
 Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
 http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
   
   
  -Original Message-
  From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:36 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  Actually the CIO is the most reasonable to work with.  The only 
  thing is he likes the chain of command format.
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:36 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  Would it be career suicide to go over their heads to the CIO 
  directly; or is there nobody higher up who would understand/act upon 
  your recommendations?
  
  -Ben-
  Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
  Director of Information Services
  Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
  http://www.hawaiilawyer.com


   -Original Message-
   From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:33 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   
   Its because the people that are between me and the CIO are wimps.
   Sorry. If I had it my way a lot of things would be
  different here. I
   make plenty of arguments they just ignore me.  But think
 of the job
   Market and how weak it is for us right now.
   
   Thank you,

   Alex Gonzalez
   Senior Systems Administrator (unfotunatly) Handleman Company 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:24 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   
   Well... Uh...how can I say this without being seen as rude
  or flaming?
   Hmm... Well, there is no way to say it.
   
   You are the _Senior_ Systems Administrator. Take control.
  Are you not
   responsible for the efficient and continued operation of
  this network?
   Can
   you not make a successful argument that misuse of it costs
  the company
   money, both real and in lost availability?
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:09 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for
  Send/Recieve on
   OXP
   
   
   That my friend is a long standing battle.  We have people
  that think
   its ok to send out 30meg files to these people.
   
   Thank you,

   Alex Gonzalez
   Senior Systems Administrator
   Handleman Company
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:59 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   
   I guess the point is that if they are sending these massive
  images and
   all they are doing is printing a comp on an ink jet to show
  the store
   manager, the problem isn't an email or bandwidth issue at all, but 
   rather a user issue with the imaging folk. They need to be taught 
   these people don't need these massive files.
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:58 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for
  Send/Recieve on
   OXP
   
   
   Honestly Martin I have no idea.  I think they print them
  off and show
   them to the store manager.  I don't really know everything those 
   people do.
   
   Thank you,

   Alex Gonzalez
   Senior Systems Administrator
   Handleman Company
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent

RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Chenault
A search on 'image resize macintosh' on google turned up lots of good hits.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


We have people on MAC's that do the imaging.  I'll talk to them.

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

In fact Windows XP has a power tool image resize tool. Just right click on
an image, select resize and it will do it.

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


Address the issue of the commandline switch. It doesn't exist. That's a
deadend alley. Back to square one.

Show how the merchandising department, with less than half-a-day of training
(again, show the math), can reduce the size of the attachments both by
reducing the JPG files (numerous utilities to do this, quite reasonable in
price, like under twenty bucks) and not use Powerpoint to send them. Let the
reps do it (it's really simple).

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP

2002-11-23 Thread Daniel Chenault
You must mean remote users working in offline mode, right? 

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 5:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP


So that users don't have to initiate the send/receive.  Currently it takes
user intervention to perform the function and we are looking for a way to
automate it.

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 4:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

What is the design goal?


 -Original Message-
 From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 3:54 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Does anyone know of a command switch for Outlook.exe in
 Outlook XP that I could create a scheduled task that would 
 open Outlook and perform a Send/Receive and then close 
 Outlook?  Or is there any third party software that would do 
 this.  Remember this is Outlook XP and the security is different.  
 
 Thank you,
  
 Alex Gonzalez
 Senior Systems Administrator
 Handleman Company
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Exchange Calendar Object and Mailbox Resource

2002-11-23 Thread Daniel Chenault
Nope. They are two separate objects and, as such, are not seen as objects
that need to be synched. You could write a tool that does this, but native
to the product? No.

-Original Message-
From: Jason Coleman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 6:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Calendar Object and Mailbox Resource


I have been posed with an interesting problem. Previous to my inheritance of
the Exchange 5.5 server, the way appointments were set was calendar objects
for each of our conference rooms were created under the public folder list
and users contacted the receptionist to reserve a room. Now, what I set up
was a mailbox whom could be invited as a resource. The problem, however, is
that there are two locations that the data can be written to and rather than
drop one and use the other, they would like users to be able to do both.
Anyone have any idea if this can be done?


Windows NT 4.0 SP6a 
Exchange Server 5.5 SP4

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5

2002-11-22 Thread Daniel Chenault
A few ways I can think of:
1. On the same page where one can put in allowed IP addresses you can add
only clients that authenticate. This, however, would require any POP/IMAP
clients using these servers to have to change their settings.
2. If it is a static set of addresses that are otherwise external to your
org add the domain(s) of those addresses to your routing tab as inbound
and have CRs that reroute to the address.
3. If the external machines have IPs  that all reside in the same subnet,
one that you do not control, have the person who controls that subnet (who
would most likely by your ISP and who would likely have an SMTP server) if
they can route through his box.

I suppose I could come up with some more solutions if I knew the details of
what these boxes are doing, who they are sending to, etc.

-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5


Have an interesting problem. Currently have our exchange server locked down
so that no one can route mail from outside the internal network. Now we are
setting up remote monitoring PC's that are using the internet to send
alerts. But obviously that will not work since they are outside the internal
network. Inputting IP info for each machine is not desired as there are over
300 machines that will be doing this and their addresses may change. Looking
for a means that these computers can authenticate to the server. This is
something that can be inserted into the code of the software sending alerts.
But I am not seeing a sure fire way to accomplish this. So to sum it up,
exchange server is locked down so no system outside the internal network can
route mail. Need to find a way that certain systems that are outside the
internal network can route mail thru our server using some sort or
authentication that is hard coded into our software. Or any other means that
anyone can think of. Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5

2002-11-22 Thread Daniel Chenault
Another thought:

Set up an internal box with a SMTP daemon. Run it on a port diff. from 25
(12345 or something equally unlikely). On your firewall map all inbound
requests for port 12345 to the IP of that internal box. As an added measure
use AUTH just in case some wiseguy finds the port on your border.

-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5


We do not need an application on the remote machines for sending the e-mail
alerts. Looking for a means of allowing these machines that are on various
other networks around the country to be able to relay thru our mail server
without being an open relay.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?

2002-11-22 Thread Daniel Chenault
Ah... More info that would have been helpful upfront.

On a Saturday...
Install another Exchange box.
Move the mailboxes to it.
Toast the old priv.edb.
Move the mailboxes back.
Deinstall the temp Exchange box.



-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?


Well, it doesn't seem to matter if we schedule an online defrag or if we
just run one right then on the fly it only runs for a few minutes and then
stops and says it's terminating.  I didn't even see any errors in the event
log.  Is it actually running and doing anything?  I'm told that if it were
really doing anything it would run for an hour or more.  We've been having
problems with it running for a few months now.  We've called Microsoft and
they say we have a corrupted IS but we're not ready to rebuild.  We're
looking for a way to force an online defrag outside of Exchange Admin from a
command line prompt.  If we have to schedule that first that's fine but we
want to kick off ourselves.  Not sure if this is possible.  Also we do not
want to do an offline defrage eseutil/edbutil because that will require
taking the services down unless we absolutely have to.  Is an offline our
only recourse?  If there is corruption in the database when you do an
offline, will it delete those corrupt files?  If so, data loss is expected
in an offline.

Thanks,
Karon Miller
Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin  

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?

2002-11-22 Thread Daniel Chenault
Open file errors? What are you using to do backup?

-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?


The reason we're trying to run it is because it hasn't ran successfully in a
few months now and we're getting TONS of open file errors at the top of
the Information Store during our backups.  We haven't gotten a good backup
in two weeks. Regardless of how we're backing up we're getting errors.
We're thinking it's because it hasn't done an online defrag in awhile.  I
have never used ISINTEG does it require shutting down the services and doing
it offline?

Thanks,
Karon Miller



 Online defrag will not fix any corruption. You have to use Isinteg for
that.
 Make a backup and run it on test setup to see if you have any errors. 
 Besides the online terminating very quickly with no errors in the 
 event log do you see any other errors during the day?
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Karon Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:16 AM
 Subject: RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?
 
 
  Well, it doesn't seem to matter if we schedule an online defrag or 
  if we just run one right then on the fly it only runs for a few 
  minutes and then stops and says it's terminating.  I didn't even see 
  any errors in the event log.  Is it actually running and doing 
  anything?  I'm told that if it were really doing anything it would 
  run for an hour or more.  We've been having problems with it running 
  for a few months now.  We've called Microsoft and they say we have a 
  corrupted IS but we're not ready to rebuild.  We're looking for a 
  way to force an online defrag outside of Exchange Admin from a 
  command line prompt.  If we have to schedule that first that's fine 
  but we want to kick off ourselves.  Not sure if this is possible.  
  Also we do not want to do an offline defrage eseutil/edbutil because 
  that will require taking the services down unless we absolutely have 
  to.  Is an offline our only recourse?  If there is corruption in the 
  database when you do an offline, will it delete those corrupt files?  
  If so, data loss is expected in an offline.
 
  Thanks,
  Karon Miller
  Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Absolute file protection

2002-11-22 Thread Daniel Chenault
Yes, you missed an option: asking on a list that is dedicated to such
issues. This one is for Exchange.

- Original Message -
From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:30 AM
Subject: OT: Absolute file protection


 Am I missing any options?

 Objective: set up server folder / storage area for access by specified
users
 only (no admin access allowed) in the NT / WIN2K server environment.

 Options, from worst to best:


 * Set up a folder with access allowed for specified users only. This
 will not work in our environment because the admins for the domain can
take
 ownership of any folder.
 * Set up a separate server and domain with the specified users the
 only admins. The specified users would have to maintain the domain (and
 server). Also, with physical access to the server, knowledgeable people
with
 enough time and effort could access the separate server and domain.
 * Use the password options of Word, Excel and other applications.
 There are software packages that can crack into these files.
 * Share a folder on the PC of one of the specified users. Anyone on
 the LAN with enough knowledge, time, and effort could hack into a shared
 folder.
 * Use available software packages to make files in a folder encrypted.
 Knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could compromise such
 files.
 * Store the files on an offsite third party system. It could be made
 difficult for anyone beyond the specified users to know that this type of
 storage arrangement had even been set up. Admins of the third party may be
 able to access the information.


 Regards,
 Orin

 Orin Rehorst
 Port of Houston Authority
 (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
 e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Phone:  (713)670-2443
 Fax:  (713)670-2457
 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html



 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?

2002-11-22 Thread Daniel Chenault
As I said in an earlier post, the quickest way out of this would likely be
to move the mailboxes to another server, delete the priv on this one and
move them back.
- Original Message -
From: Karon Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:33 AM
Subject: RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?


 Veritas Backup Exec 8.6. and NO we're not using the Open File Agent
 because that doesn't work.  And yes, we're doing BLBs because my hands are
 tied on changing this policy.  I don't think my problem now is related to
 doing BLBs its that we can't get a good online defrag to run possibly due
 to database corruption.  We may have to do some offline defrags but we're
 hoping we can fix this online.  Thanks, Karon


  Open file errors? What are you using to do backup?
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:37 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Re: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?
 
 
  The reason we're trying to run it is because it hasn't ran successfully
in a
  few months now and we're getting TONS of open file errors at the top
of
  the Information Store during our backups.  We haven't gotten a good
backup
  in two weeks. Regardless of how we're backing up we're getting errors.
  We're thinking it's because it hasn't done an online defrag in awhile.
I
  have never used ISINTEG does it require shutting down the services and
doing
  it offline?
 
  Thanks,
  Karon Miller
 
 
 
   Online defrag will not fix any corruption. You have to use Isinteg for
  that.
   Make a backup and run it on test setup to see if you have any errors.
   Besides the online terminating very quickly with no errors in the
   event log do you see any other errors during the day?
  
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Karon Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:16 AM
   Subject: RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?
  
  
Well, it doesn't seem to matter if we schedule an online defrag or
if we just run one right then on the fly it only runs for a few
minutes and then stops and says it's terminating.  I didn't even see
any errors in the event log.  Is it actually running and doing
anything?  I'm told that if it were really doing anything it would
run for an hour or more.  We've been having problems with it running
for a few months now.  We've called Microsoft and they say we have a
corrupted IS but we're not ready to rebuild.  We're looking for a
way to force an online defrag outside of Exchange Admin from a
command line prompt.  If we have to schedule that first that's fine
but we want to kick off ourselves.  Not sure if this is possible.
Also we do not want to do an offline defrage eseutil/edbutil because
that will require taking the services down unless we absolutely have
to.  Is an offline our only recourse?  If there is corruption in the
database when you do an offline, will it delete those corrupt files?
If so, data loss is expected in an offline.
   
Thanks,
Karon Miller
Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin
   
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Exchange System Account

2002-11-21 Thread Daniel Chenault
Doable, but why? I mean, I can whack myself in the head with a 2x4. Very
doable, but why?

- Original Message -
From: Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:26 PM
Subject: Exchange System Account


Hi,

What is the consenus out there on using an assigned Exchange service
account vs using the Local System account for Exchange 2000?  This would
be for a fairly large environment.


Thanks,
Darrin

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Exchange System Account

2002-11-21 Thread Daniel Chenault
None that I can see.

- Original Message - 
From: Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 6:12 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange System Account


Just curious if anyone could see any reason why they would want to
this.

Just throwing it out there.

Thanks,
Darrin

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange System Account


Doable, but why? I mean, I can whack myself in the head with a 2x4. Very
doable, but why?

- Original Message -
From: Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:26 PM
Subject: Exchange System Account


Hi,

What is the consenus out there on using an assigned Exchange service
account vs using the Local System account for Exchange 2000?  This would
be for a fairly large environment.


Thanks,
Darrin

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Weird SMTP header problem

2002-11-20 Thread Daniel Chenault
That does indeed match the description of the escalation I mentioned
earlier. Except for the all-of-a-sudden-without-warning bit. The reboot
especially throws a fly in the ointment. This is one for PSS.

-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem


Briefly:
We are in the process of migrating from MSX5.5 to E2K. All user mailboxes
are on E2K servers, but we are still using our 5.5 IMS server for Internet
email. For a couple of months, all was well. Internet mail made it to
Outlook with all Received headers intact.

Starting last week, however, Internet email started showing up in Outlook
with all the Received headers stripped, and a bogus Received header
inserted by the E2K mailbox server. A reboot of the E2K mailbox servers
(both are showing the same symptom!) last week fixed the problem, but then
it came back.

Our email flow is:

1. kimball.com MX record points to servers at Cleanmail.
2. Cleanmail inserts it's SMTP headers and forwards to the IP address of our
CheckPoint firewall. 3. The CheckPoint does packet forwarding (it does not
get involved in the SMTP conversation) to our MSX 5.5 IMS server. 4. The 5.5
IMS server then sends to the E2K mailbox servers via MTA

I have created a simplified scenario to prove to myself (and Ed ...) that
the problem is within the Exchange system. I can use Blat to send an email
to the 5.5 IMS server (with debug on to verify that I really am talking to
the IMS server) and see the same behavior (no Received header by the IMS
server).

I have verified via the tracking logs that my Blat message went to the 5.5
IMS server via SMTP, and then to the E2K mailbox server via MTA.

Now adding more to this bizarre problem, I just changed a unix box to
smart-host to our E2K mailbox server, and used the unix box as a relay from
blat, and all the headers showed up! The fix appears to just hurry up and
retire our 5.5 IMS server! I don't like not knowing why we are having this
problem, however...   

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 7:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Weird SMTP header problem


I've been trying to follow along; maybe this isn't the same thing I was
referring to.

Help me out here: when mail from outside (like this one) hits your org, what
path does it follow?

- Original Message -
From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:19 AM
Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem


 But it happens with external mail as well.

 Our test systems have never shown this symptom.

 Our production E2K system never started doing this until last week (we
can't
 think of anything that's changed on any of the Exchange servers). It's
been
 running for a couple of months now.

 Like I've said earlier, this behavior stopped after rebooting the E2K
 mailbox server, but now it's back!


 -Original Message-
 From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:28 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem


 I recall reporting this and escalating it when I still worked there.
 Was told it's by design when SMTP mail is transferred within an 
 organization.

 -Original Message-
 From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:20 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem


 To summarize my problem, my E2K mailbox server is stripping SMTP
Received:
 headers, and making up it's own. Last week when this happened, a
 reboot cleared up the problem, but it came back (not been able to 
 reboot again, yet).

 Ed, is this proof enough?

 I've managed to distill the problem down to a simple set of steps.

 1. Send email from my PC to the MSX 5.5 IMS server using blat. Here's
 the
 output:
 Failed to open registry key for Blat profile , using default. Failed to
open
 registry key for Blat Sending x.kix to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Login name
 is [EMAIL PROTECTED] getline 220 nts126.kimball.com ESMTP Server 
 (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 5.5.2652.78) ready
 putline EHLO 051kcornet
 getline 250-nts126.kimball.com Hello [051KCORNET] 250-XEXCH50
250-HELP
 250-ETRN 250-DSN 250-SIZE 0 250-AUTH LOGIN 250 AUTH=LOGIN
 putline MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 getline 250 OK - mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 putline RCPT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 getline 250 OK - Recipient [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 putline DATA
 getline 354 Send data.  End with CRLF.CRLF getline 250 OK
 putline QUIT
 getline 221 closing connection

 2. Here's NTS126's log entries from above message

 c=us;a= ;p=kii;l=NTS1260211191352XC17P83W 1012 2002.11.19 13:52:20
 /o=KII/ou=Jasper001/cn=Configuration/cn=Connections/cn=Internet Mail 
 Connector (NTS126) 
 /o=KII/ou=Jasper001/cn=Configuration/cn=Connections/cn=Internet Mail

RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?

2002-11-20 Thread Daniel Chenault
No. Better would be to troubleshoot why it isn't running. What is showing in
event viewer?

-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?


Are there any command line switches that I can use to run the online defrag
in Exchange 5.5?  My online defrag isn't running and if I can just force it
to run maybe from a command line prompt and not within Exchange Admin, that
would great.

Thanks,
Karon Miller
Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin, LLP

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Weird SMTP header problem

2002-11-19 Thread Daniel Chenault
I recall reporting this and escalating it when I still worked there. Was
told it's by design when SMTP mail is transferred within an organization.

-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem


To summarize my problem, my E2K mailbox server is stripping SMTP Received:
headers, and making up it's own. Last week when this happened, a reboot
cleared up the problem, but it came back (not been able to reboot again,
yet).

Ed, is this proof enough?

I've managed to distill the problem down to a simple set of steps.

1. Send email from my PC to the MSX 5.5 IMS server using blat. Here's the
output:
Failed to open registry key for Blat profile , using default. Failed to open
registry key for Blat Sending x.kix to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Login name is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] getline 220 nts126.kimball.com ESMTP Server
(Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 5.5.2652.78) ready 
putline EHLO 051kcornet
getline 250-nts126.kimball.com Hello [051KCORNET] 250-XEXCH50 250-HELP
250-ETRN 250-DSN 250-SIZE 0 250-AUTH LOGIN 250 AUTH=LOGIN 
putline MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
getline 250 OK - mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
putline RCPT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
getline 250 OK - Recipient [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
putline DATA
getline 354 Send data.  End with CRLF.CRLF 
getline 250 OK 
putline QUIT
getline 221 closing connection 

2. Here's NTS126's log entries from above message

c=us;a= ;p=kii;l=NTS1260211191352XC17P83W   10122002.11.19 13:52:20
/o=KII/ou=Jasper001/cn=Configuration/cn=Connections/cn=Internet Mail
Connector (NTS126)
/o=KII/ou=Jasper001/cn=Configuration/cn=Connections/cn=Internet Mail
Connector (NTS126)  XC17P83W[EMAIL PROTECTED]   0   1555
0   0   1
c=us;a= ;p=kii;l=NTS1260211191352XC17P83W   10132002.11.19 13:52:20
/o=KII/ou=Jasper001/cn=Configuration/cn=Connections/cn=Internet Mail
Connector (NTS126)
/o=KII/ou=Jasper001/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=NTS126/cn=Microsoft
Private MDB
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   0   15550   0   1
C=us;A= ;P=kii;L=NTS1260211191352XC17P83W   0   2002.11.19 13:52:21
/O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=CONNECTIONS/CN=INTERNET MAIL
CONNECTOR (NTS126)  C=US;A=
;P=KII;O=Jasper001;DDA:SMTP=fubar(a)kimball.com;0   21590
0   1
C=us;A= ;P=kii;L=NTS1260211191352XC17P83W   7   2002.11.19 13:52:21
/O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=SERVERS/CN=NTS390/CN=MICROSOFT MTA
C=US;A= ;P=KII;O=Jasper001;DDA:SMTP=fubar(a)kimball.com;0   2159
0   0   1

The most pertinent part of the logs is the event IDs: 1012 - SMTP received,
1013 - SMTP transferred inbound, 0 - Message transferred in, and 7 - message
transferred out. Notice there is no 1010 or 1011 (outbound SMTP)

Next, here's the tracking.log entries from the E2K mailbox server

11/19/2002  13:52:26 GMT-   -   -   NTS390  -
/O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kcornet1027
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0   0
13541   2002-11-19 13:52:26 GMT 0   -   c=us;a=
;p=kii;l=NTS1260211191352XC17P83W   Contents of file: x.kix
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   -
11/19/2002  13:52:26 GMT-   -   -   NTS390  -
/O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kcornet1019
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0   0
13541   2002-11-19 13:52:26 GMT 0   -   -   Contents of
file: x.kix [EMAIL PROTECTED]   -
11/19/2002  13:52:26 GMT-   -   -   NTS390  -
/O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kcornet1025
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0   0
13541   2002-11-19 13:52:26 GMT 0   -   -   Contents of
file: x.kix [EMAIL PROTECTED]   -
11/19/2002  13:52:26 GMT-   -   -   NTS390  -
/O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kcornet1024
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0   0
13541   2002-11-19 13:52:26 GMT 0   -   -   Contents of
file: x.kix [EMAIL PROTECTED]   -
11/19/2002  13:52:26 GMT-   -   -   NTS390  -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]1023
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0   0
13541   2002-11-19 13:52:26 GMT 0   -   -   Contents of
file: x.kix [EMAIL PROTECTED]   -
11/19/2002  13:52:26 GMT-   -   -   NTS390  -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]1028
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0   0
13541   2002-11-19 13:52:26 GMT 0   -   -   Contents of
file: x.kix [EMAIL PROTECTED]   -

Lastly, here's what I see from outlook 2002:

Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: by nts390.kii.kimball.com 
id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Nov 2002
08:51:56 -0500
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: Contents of file: x.kix
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:51:56 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: application/ms-tnef;
name=winmail.dat
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary

Re: Weird SMTP header problem

2002-11-19 Thread Daniel Chenault
I've been trying to follow along; maybe this isn't the same thing I was
referring to.

Help me out here: when mail from outside (like this one) hits your org, what
path does it follow?

- Original Message -
From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:19 AM
Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem


 But it happens with external mail as well.

 Our test systems have never shown this symptom.

 Our production E2K system never started doing this until last week (we
can't
 think of anything that's changed on any of the Exchange servers). It's
been
 running for a couple of months now.

 Like I've said earlier, this behavior stopped after rebooting the E2K
 mailbox server, but now it's back!


 -Original Message-
 From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:28 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem


 I recall reporting this and escalating it when I still worked there. Was
 told it's by design when SMTP mail is transferred within an organization.

 -Original Message-
 From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:20 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem


 To summarize my problem, my E2K mailbox server is stripping SMTP
Received:
 headers, and making up it's own. Last week when this happened, a reboot
 cleared up the problem, but it came back (not been able to reboot again,
 yet).

 Ed, is this proof enough?

 I've managed to distill the problem down to a simple set of steps.

 1. Send email from my PC to the MSX 5.5 IMS server using blat. Here's the
 output:
 Failed to open registry key for Blat profile , using default. Failed to
open
 registry key for Blat Sending x.kix to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Login name is
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] getline 220 nts126.kimball.com ESMTP Server
 (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 5.5.2652.78) ready
 putline EHLO 051kcornet
 getline 250-nts126.kimball.com Hello [051KCORNET] 250-XEXCH50
250-HELP
 250-ETRN 250-DSN 250-SIZE 0 250-AUTH LOGIN 250 AUTH=LOGIN
 putline MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 getline 250 OK - mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 putline RCPT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 getline 250 OK - Recipient [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 putline DATA
 getline 354 Send data.  End with CRLF.CRLF
 getline 250 OK
 putline QUIT
 getline 221 closing connection

 2. Here's NTS126's log entries from above message

 c=us;a= ;p=kii;l=NTS1260211191352XC17P83W 1012 2002.11.19 13:52:20
 /o=KII/ou=Jasper001/cn=Configuration/cn=Connections/cn=Internet Mail
 Connector (NTS126)
 /o=KII/ou=Jasper001/cn=Configuration/cn=Connections/cn=Internet Mail
 Connector (NTS126) XC17P83W [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 1555
 0 0 1
 c=us;a= ;p=kii;l=NTS1260211191352XC17P83W 1013 2002.11.19 13:52:20
 /o=KII/ou=Jasper001/cn=Configuration/cn=Connections/cn=Internet Mail
 Connector (NTS126)
 /o=KII/ou=Jasper001/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=NTS126/cn=Microsoft
 Private MDB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 1555 0 0 1
 C=us;A= ;P=kii;L=NTS1260211191352XC17P83W 0 2002.11.19 13:52:21
 /O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=CONNECTIONS/CN=INTERNET MAIL
 CONNECTOR (NTS126) C=US;A=
 ;P=KII;O=Jasper001;DDA:SMTP=fubar(a)kimball.com; 0 2159 0
 0 1
 C=us;A= ;P=kii;L=NTS1260211191352XC17P83W 7 2002.11.19 13:52:21
 /O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=SERVERS/CN=NTS390/CN=MICROSOFT MTA
 C=US;A= ;P=KII;O=Jasper001;DDA:SMTP=fubar(a)kimball.com; 0 2159
 0 0 1

 The most pertinent part of the logs is the event IDs: 1012 - SMTP
received,
 1013 - SMTP transferred inbound, 0 - Message transferred in, and 7 -
message
 transferred out. Notice there is no 1010 or 1011 (outbound SMTP)

 Next, here's the tracking.log entries from the E2K mailbox server

 11/19/2002 13:52:26 GMT - - - NTS390 -
 /O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kcornet 1027
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0
 1354 1 2002-11-19 13:52:26 GMT 0 - c=us;a=
 ;p=kii;l=NTS1260211191352XC17P83W Contents of file: x.kix
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
 11/19/2002 13:52:26 GMT - - - NTS390 -
 /O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kcornet 1019
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0
 1354 1 2002-11-19 13:52:26 GMT 0 - - Contents of
 file: x.kix [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
 11/19/2002 13:52:26 GMT - - - NTS390 -
 /O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kcornet 1025
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0
 1354 1 2002-11-19 13:52:26 GMT 0 - - Contents of
 file: x.kix [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
 11/19/2002 13:52:26 GMT - - - NTS390 -
 /O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kcornet 1024
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0
 1354 1 2002-11-19 13:52:26 GMT 0 - - Contents of
 file: x.kix [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
 11/19/2002 13:52:26 GMT - - - NTS390 -
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1023
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0
 1354 1 2002-11-19 13:52:26 GMT 0 - - Contents of
 file: x.kix [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
 11/19/2002 13:52:26 GMT - - - NTS390 -
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1028
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0
 1354 1 2002-11-19 13:52:26 GMT 0 - - Contents of
 file: x.kix [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

 Lastly, here's what I see from

Re: replace exchange 5.5 hardware

2002-11-19 Thread Daniel Chenault
1. Install Exchange on the new box.
2. Join the existing site
3. Move the mailboxes
4. Follow the KB article on removing the first server in a site
5. Leave the old box up for a week (until you are sure that every user has
logged in at least once).
6. Decommission the old box.

- Original Message -
From: frank123 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 1:05 PM
Subject: replace exchange 5.5 hardware


 Hi,

 Can anyone advice what is the best way to replace exchange 5.5 on NT 4.o
 hardware? we already have new server in place, which has Windows 2000
 server. One way I know is shutdown the exchange 5.5 now, and name window
 2000 server the same name as exchange 5.5, join the the existing site?? (
 this is the only site we have. Anyother suggestions?

 Thanks

 Frank

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Help with Exlist

2002-11-18 Thread Daniel Chenault
I never could get it running. I contacted the author and he was no help
either (none at all) as he had changed positions and lost interest in the
project. (NB: this was when I still worked at MS).

-Original Message-
From: Owen Parry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 7:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help with Exlist


I'm trying to get EXLIST, the Exchange listserver provided in the Back
Office Res Kit, to work on my system (Ex 5.5 SP4 under NT4 SP6a with IIS4)

I've installed all the stated prerequisites and followed the installation
instructions but when I come to run the Listserver Installer I get a message
saying I don't have permissions set correctly. I'm finding the instructions
ambiguous at this point in any case. However, I am running as the system
administrator with permissions on everything so I'm not sure where to go
next.

Any pointers ?



Owen Parry
Pennaeth Cyfrifiadura Gweinyddol / Head of Administrative Computing
Prifysgol Cymru / University of Wales
Tel: (029) 2038 2656   Ffacs/Fax: (029) 2039 6040



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Using a pub folder for the list

2002-11-15 Thread Daniel Chenault
FAQ

Psst: proves you haven't read the FAQ. Bad listuser!!

- Original Message - 
From: Johnny Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 6:40 PM
Subject: Using a pub folder for the list


 Hi all,
 Can someone repost on how to use a public folder for subscribing to the
 list? Thx.
 
 Johnny
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Online Defragmentation

2002-11-15 Thread Daniel Chenault
Patently Stupid Simpletons?

- Original Message -
From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:16 AM
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation


 Who is PSS again?

 -Original Message-
 From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:cvaglica;bckpc.com]
 Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:11 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation


 Call PSS

 -Original Message-
 From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com]
 Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:04 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Online Defragmentation


 I have just this on the Event Viewer. What should I do?

 Event ID: 184
 Source: ESE97

 Description:
 MSExchangeIS ((353) ) Online defragmentation  of database
 'D:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB' terminated prematurely after encountering
 unexpected error -1019.

 Everything is still working fine. I found some thing like this on technet,
 but it have the unexpected error -1018

 Any info is helpful Thank

 Tony Nguyen

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >