E2K SP3
W2K SP3
Any idea why I can't add an smtp address to every mailbox in the org?
I am trying to add it to the default policy then apply the ppolicy, and
it isn't working..
_
List posting FAQ:
Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recipient Policies
E2K SP3
W2K SP3
Any idea why I
Ok, now he says we need to restart the SA for it take effect...
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recipient Policies
Nothing at all..
I am on the phone with PSS as we speak, he seems a tad confused
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recipient Policies
E2K SP3
W2K SP3
Any idea why I can't add an smtp address to every mailbox in the org?
I am trying
. You don't have a 5.5 box in your org,
do you?
-Yanek.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday,
January 12, 2004 12:30 Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Recipient Policies
Subject: Recipient Policies
E2K SP3
W2K SP3
Any idea
I have a very stooopid St Bernard.. Does that count as big? ~190lbs
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake
Cool. A dog thread.
-Original Message-
From: Martin
lol
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake
And just to be clear, I said meet
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;224493
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Faust
Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 8:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Removing/Deleting Message
Question:
I have a public folder contact list (Master Contact) with 4000 contacts.
When I try to go from A to H it bombs. Nothing shows up under H
If I close Outlook and then go to H everything is there. I have tried it
on the Server with 1gb of ram it it still does it.
I have a public folder contact list (Master Contact) with 4000 contacts.
When I try to go from A to H it bombs. Nothing shows up under H
If I close Outlook and then go to H everything is there. I have tried it
on the Server with 1gb of ram it it still does it.
looks like a bad transaction log ...
this may help
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;301438
also may be a good time for a PSS call to MS if the above looks daunting
to you ...
Mike
850-487-7509
-Original Message-
From: Keith Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
I concur with greg ... our server had those settings and we were being
used as a relay ... turned off Allow all computers which successfully
authenticate to relay, regardless of the list above. and that stopped
it ...
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
/Authentication/Anonymous Access tab
that must be checked
P.S.:
I tell users they can still pop their mail from outside our closed user
group; but they must use their ISP's SMTP relay for sending mail or use
OWA ...
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL
talking dirty like that just gets me pumped up for the weekend ... yum
...
thanks for all the input (all puns intended that relate to vendor
whores)
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:35 PM
To: Exchange
in advance
Mike
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
yeah ... that is one thing we were thinking of .. another is setting up
a big beefy box with VMWare ...
I was looking for other options ... one I found was
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;811063
Thanks
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL
good word/bad word ... works ... but I can't seem to get it to
stop giving test emails with very few words bad scores ...
I lot of options to choose from ... nice header options ...
individual whitelist (but no individual blacklist)
etc ...
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Parkey
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;262054
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Schilbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 Service Account Permissions
Hi All,
I was wondering
That is not funny
Haiku is for more than that
I think I need beer
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
OK, since it is Friday, I declare that further
We have a sendmail box out in front of our exchange org purely for spam
filtering. We are running PureMessage on Slackware 9.
-Original Message-
From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Processing by
We do it because puremessage runs on sendmail.
-Original Message-
From: Sean Faust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail
Back to my original question, we use Surf Control in
Hi russki
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail
Just call me Russki.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL
By the way, I am still waiting for my book...
-Original Message-
From: David Grimstone (DSLWN) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
That would be Hemmoroid.
-Original Message-
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins,
Mike
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
By the way, I am still waiting for my book
I only have aspirations of reaching that plateau..
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
I'm a male whore. :)
_
John Bowles
this with an SMTP connector that uses my spam
server (spam.server.org) as a smart host and the email address
([EMAIL PROTECTED] ) as my address space ...
Does this sound correct?
Do I also need to set up my Virtual SMTP Servers as local bridgehead
servers?
Thanks in advance ...
Mike
for your comments
thanks
Mike
the sooner you fall behind, the more time you will have to catch up -
Steven Wright
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a SAN
I always do full. Far quicker restore procedure if necessary.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 December 2003 15:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup rituals
What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites? I've looked
through the
Tequila!
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 December 2003 16:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals
Real men drink Stout!
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
It makes you Happy!!
-Original Message-
From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 December 2003 16:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals
Tequila!
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 December 2003 16:20
Hi all
We are going to be purchasing a low/mid end SAN and plan on moving our
Exchange Back End Server Storage to it ...
Comments? Things to read? Experiences? Choices of SAN?
Thanks in advance ...
Mike Wohlgemuth
To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; to steal from many
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Kevinm v1.3. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 November 2003 17:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server
You in 5.5 ??
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
] On Behalf Of Mike Dixon
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 4:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Phantom email address in Exchange Server
I'm trying to add the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
Administrator tells me that the address is already in use in the
organisation.
If I send
-
From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 3:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server
Sorry, 5.5 Build 1960.5.
-Original Message-
From: Kevinm v1.3. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 November 2003 17:00
SP4 to your client.
As for your orphan, do a directory export (all objects - including the
secondary proxy addresses) to find it.
If you arent sure how to export the secondary proxy addresses, do a search
in Technet on how to do that.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL
I'm trying to add the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
Administrator tells me that the address is already in use in the
organisation.
If I send a test email to the address, I get a System Admin message
informing me that the address does not exist.
Does anybody know what I can do to
how many domains?
do you have a RUS for each domain?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: exchange 2003 ma!lbox move fa!lure
first xch 2003 server in xch 5.5 site. everything has
suggestion : make a change, go have a cup of coffee, shmooz with some
co-workers, read a journal ..
then check to see if everything is working ...
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
turn on message tracking
check the headers also
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Crista Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 - Exchange 2k Error Message
Alright, new problem... now the send/receive
and people don't believe in ghosts ...
this is proof enough for me ...
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Error associated with deceased employee
The event log
...
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Troels Majlandt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 1:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: More than one domain in the same AD / Exchange
Hmm, maybe there is somethÃng that I have overlook here.
Yes the Exchange should
anyone else getting weird messages from internet.com concerning this
mailing list ...all in bulk ... a month old?
Mike
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com
Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu Nov 06 15:43:20 2003
Subject: internet.com
anyone else getting weird messages from internet.com concerning this
mailing list ...all in bulk ... a month old?
Mike
for 40 mailboxes from over 4000 is not an option ...
Mike
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
ex2k ... sorry ..
still makes me poke through for the 40 people that are scattered
throughout my exchange storage groups ...
not a solution .. thanks anyway ...
is that one of the header fields in doing a csvde export? hmmm
Mike
850-487-7509
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse
something like this Xwall --- Exchange (Front end
servers) (separate servers)
If you want more detailed info, feel free to contact me directly ...
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
unique whitelists for
individual users ...)
For the price, it is great ... Probably be bought out soon ...
mike
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Off-topic
must be encrypted.
Does anyone have experience with encryption and PHI data? We are looking
into the future where other groups of people will also use this product to
encrypt information that they send outside the organization.
Any guidance on these products would be greatly appreciated.
Mike
Thanks Martin. I will look and see if I can find it.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Encryption packages
Mike,
There was a massive thread on here about this subject
Scott,
What software package was chosen to do the encryption?
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Encryption packages
OMG don't get me started on HIPAA. MY parent
Christopher,
What software package did you choose?
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 2:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Encryption packages
We tried encrypting it for about a week. After
/bulletin/ms03-046.asp )
V1.0 October 15, 2003: First Published.
V1.1 October 22, 2003: Removed unnecessary information from Deployment
in the Exchange Server 5.5 Service Pack 4 section of Security Patch
Information.
Comments? Clarifications?
mike
was not redone. Just the wording of the alert.
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: patch MS03-046 update clarification
The way I read the update (ver 1.1) to this patch (for my scenario,
W2K
Kurt,
This is totally normal.
Store.exe grabs all the memory it needs, but is well behaved about
giving it back as the system requires it.
Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 October 2003 12:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Store.exe
Xwall 3.28 does allow for GAL checking ... Although I haven't tried it
yet
mike
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 5:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help! Mail Queue is all blocked up...
Since Xwall has
anybody help? Are there other suggestions I can try, in order to
reduce my mail congestion problem?
Thanks in advance,
Mike
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm
can they see their mail after you append \exchange\username for their
failed login?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange digest: October 14, 2003
Hello Andrey
system manager/recipient policies
Mike
850-487-7509
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address
Yes
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov
use the recipient policy in system manager ...
Uso wrote:
Exchange 2000.
regards
Uso
- Original Message -
From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: Bulk set of primary smtp address
Which version of
can the client then put in \exchange\username and see their mail?
check that your orgs primary email address is in his list of smtp
addresses ...
mike
OWA suddenly (for an unknown reason) stopped working for one client.
After client enters mailbox name/user name and pass the next screen
user/group membership is not put in the FQDN of the group cn=
can be gottten from ADSI edit ...
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: sending mail to all users
Hi,
How
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q138053sd=tech
I have an app called fentun.exe that I use to get the attachment out of the
winmail.dat file when it comes from external. Works pretty slick, but in
your case you don't want to have to send that to everyone.
-Mike Carlson
it works properly?
I have gone those the folders; system folders; events roots;
eventconfig_SERVERID and everything is correct. I have assured that the
account is the same in all resources.
Still I am perplexed and need your assistance.
Thanks!!!
Mike Mitchell
Systems email Administrator
: RE: Agent Tabs In Outlook
Well Outlook98 is a while back, somewhere in the options-Advance-Add IN
manager, you have to turn on the server side scripting tab right? I think
every version of Outlook gets you there in a different way :)
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL
Kim,
Sounds like Mimail virus -
http://www.cert.org/incident_notes/IN-2003-02.html has the gory details.
I suggest you update your anti-virus protection, this has been around
for a while.
Regards,
Mike Scott
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:]
Sent: 22 September 2003 10
Kim,
This is the Mimail virus - The headers tell you that Scanmail is picking
it up. Looks like it's doing it's job fine - Be happy!
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 September 2003 13:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: [EMAIL
Those are the outbound queues.
-Original Message-
From: Henry, Christopher M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 server - smtp queue
I am looking at my default SMTP virtual server queue under protocols in
Yup yup
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Use of OST's over WAN
Those guys are PERFECT candidates for Outlook 2003 with Cache Mode.
-Original Message-
From: Gavin
/Mailboxes, right click on the
Maiboxes and select Run Cleanup Agent. Better now?
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 6:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Duncan Scott
Subject: Mailbox moves completed, but
Good afternoon
. The same thing you probably used
to move the mailboxes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox moves completed, but
I am sorry. What is ESM? I
I will definitely take you up!
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A CHALLENGE to the List
Well, it appears that a number of individuals from this list have chosen
to engage in
Tom,
That is what I finally did. I found an article on phantom mailboxes and did
as it suggested. The problem was I didn't know to use the word phantom...
Thanks for everyone's help.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19
.
Thanks for any help you might have.
Regards,
Mike Mitchell
Systems email Administrator
Alverno Information Services
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211
Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when
you don't! - Pete Seeger
Winroute
reskit
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: is there a way to display LinkState?
Exchange servers do all this nice work discovering route failures by
sending linkstate
. What might be causing this?
Thanks and have a great week.
Mike Mitchell
Systems email Administrator
Alverno Information Services
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211
Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when
you don't! - Pete Seeger
Brick Level Backups, baad..
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Shimmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 7:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Brick Level Backup
Hi all
What is the best brick level backup software for Exchange 2000? I have
gave up on
I have a Thunder Grey truck.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Deckler wrote a book?!?
Anyone know where MEC is this year?
- Original Message -
From: Robert Moir [EMAIL
Please describe the issue.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
Do any of you 2 know anything about my issue?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
support and it talks about turning off virus
scan product. That seems dangerous. I have turned off the size factor on
the servers.
Has anyone else experienced this problem?
Have a great weekend.
Mike Mitchell
Systems email Administrator
Alverno Information Services
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*:(317) 783
We actually had this same problem last week. The fix for 2 servers wouldn't be bad,
but it involves installing post SP3 rollup for exchange to keep it from happening
again.
Basically unregister xlsasink.dll on both servers. Shut down both servers. Bring
routing master back up first then other
Actually, the KB article states the March one, so that's the one I did.
Here is the info I received..
Here's the summary of actions:
The first step is to apply Exchange 2000 SP3 and the post SP-3 hotfix in
article; 330279 XCON: Deleted Routing Groups Are Listed in the WinRoute
Tool; Fix
Wasn't it released in March?
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: New E2K Roll-up fix working OK
Hello,
FWIW, the newly released E2K post-SP3 Roll-up fix has been working fine
Server Post-Service Pack 3 Rollup
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;824282
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike
Posted At: Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:37 PM Posted To: Exchange
Discussion List
You need an smtp connector to the internet. The address scope should be
* and a cpst of 1.
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 7:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Newbie question. No flames please, I am covered with
My bad, I wasn't paying attention.. On phone with pss..argh..
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Newbie question. No flames please, I am covered with jet
fuel.
By default E2K
No
What language in particular (perl, jscript, python, vbscript)?
ActiveDir.org
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT :: Other Discussion List
Does anybody know of
Morgan
AIMCO
W. 864 239-1015
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT :: Other Discussion List
No
What language in particular (perl, jscript, python, vbscript)?
ActiveDir.org
Jim,
Thanks for the book reference. I will run out and get it.
I was trying to block Neena [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I used ew01.com
and that didn't block it. According to the rules, how would you have
blocked this junk mail?
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim
Create a contact and forward it to that contact.
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forwarding Email
Hey all...
(2KSrv/EX2K Fully Spacked)
one of my users would like me to forward
Jim,
Send them to me so I can block also.. Please!!! So I want to block
@ew01.com Okay I will try that. Thanks.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message
If they were released after sp4 was, yes. All SP's and hotfixes need to
be installed chronologically.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 2000 SP4 upgrade and security
for a few characters. What is the limit of number
of sites you can block?
Thanks,
Mike Mitchell
Systems email Administrator
Alverno Information Services
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211
Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when
you don't! - Pete Seeger
Nate,
I don't understand what you are saying? I know I can block full domains
(@yahoo.com) but what I want is to block @**.ivy.net for @01.ivy.net and
@02.ivy.net
You see the suffix is .ivy.net but the prefix is 01 and 02...
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto
We have done a few here with no issues so far.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Any issues with W2k RPC patch on Exchange 2000?
Has anyone applied the Blaster RPC patch to a W2k
they don't have any. It also reports that Sam has a
message but in reality it is coming from Sue. We have run the /cleanviews
and that makes no differences.
Please help!!
Thanks.
Mike Mitchell
Systems email Administrator
Alverno Information Services
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211
items folder
Uncheck the automatically process read receipts box.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 2:23 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Items moving to deleted items folder
Subject: Items moving to deleted items folder
lmao
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 8:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
And so it begins...
At least Robert spelled *plonk* correctly... G
-Original Message-
From: Robert
responses
after processing (This is in Outlook 2002, but 98 should have something
similar.
Thank you,
Mitchell D. Lawrence
Network Administrator/Systems Analyst
**Good|Cheap|Fast (Pick Two)**
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 9
mailbox to a PST, deleted his old mailbox,
created a new mailbox, and restored from the PST. Still no good. These
items are moving to the deleted items folder.
Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Mike Mitchell
Systems email Administrator
Alverno Information Services
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*:(317) 783-9341
: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
Can't spell when your upset.
I don't want to argue anymore. I have work to do.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services
1 - 100 of 1027 matches
Mail list logo
