What is the cost of the client?
-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange
Well... Ximian with the exchange connector has the advantage of being able
to
I just looked and there is 691 out there but is in test so it must be
manually downloaded. I also found the virus yaya in their encyclopedia.
http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_YAHA.AF
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
. One
has to go to the virus enc to search. I'm surprised that 691 is still in
the CPR state. Trend usually has them out of CPR within 24 hours.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday
Exchange 5.5
Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send.
This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on
our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the
smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall
Exchange 5.5
We have a new president coming into the University who has some unusual
requests. She would like to have two separate icons available on her
desktop which point to two separate outlook accounts which will pipe in the
username/domain/password. One for herself and one for the
never heard of the
topic. Has something to do with why the @#$% logins and passwords are
required in the first place. Sheesh.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
No problem but thought I would post. One of out Affiliate Hospitals was
rejecting mail and it turns out the Osirusoft blacklisted the world. Anyone
who runs RBL's might want to look at this. We currently don't run RBL's,
but I thought the article was interesting.
This may be a stupid question. We are looking into applying SP4 to our 2000
servers. If we apply SP4, will it require the re-install of any security
patches that we have put into place in the last few weeks such as MDAC or
any of the buffer overflow security patches we have put into place after
after sp4 was, yes. All SP's and hotfixes need to
be installed chronologically.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 2000 SP4 upgrade and security patches.
This may
Exchange 5.5.
We've been getting hammered by the SOBIG virus here. In the last hour both
the systems that house our IMC failed on port 25 and I had to reboot. I
pretty sure it's due to the flood of messages we are encountering. SOBIG
count was 35,000 day before yesterday 45,000 yesterday.
?
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 1:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Port 25 failing on IMC due to SOBIG.
Exchange 5.5.
We've been getting hammered by the SOBIG virus here. In the last hour both
We will have 4 levels shortly, using 3 different vendors.
1. Have TrendMicro on the Exchange Servers for the mailboxes.
2. Have McAfee for file scanning on the server level (saved our butts a
couple of times).
3. Have McAfee on the Desktop level.
4. Soon to have Mirapoint installed as front end
We recently had a problem as well. The resolution was do de-install tcpip
and re-install on the workstation having the issue. Have no idea why that
would fix it, but it worked in our cases.
-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19,
Scott,
What was your original issue? There is an ongoing argument on GroupShield
versus ScanMail at our site. Management keeps pressing to cutover to
GroupShield to save money since we have a site license for the campus that
includes Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Force
Sorry if this comes in a second time. Tried posting and it didn't come
through...sending as plain text this time.
Exchange 5.5 SP4 on 2000 Server running OWA IIS 5.0. Have current security
patches. Check version of CDO.DLL version 5.5.2655.79 CDOHTLM.DLL
5.5.2655.77 which seems to be current.
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:49 PM
Subject: RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).
Scott,
What was your original issue? There is an ongoing argument on GroupShield
, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 OWA hangs, cannot stop/restart IIS question
Sorry if this comes in a second time. Tried posting and it didn't come
through...sending as plain text this time
Don't forget about eseutil DB repair tool in the advent you hav a
corruption. The repair functions processes at a given rate (can't remember
how fast) so a full repair on a large database could run for half a day or
more depending on the size.
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario
This is a little off topic. Running Scanmail 3.80 engine 6.510 pattern 587.
When a external user sends an infected message to lets say 30 users and only
one is on our Exchange, scanmail cleans that message but sends a
notification message back to all 30 users stating it cleaned it?
Man that
Let me clarify a little. We have sender notification off. We have
recipient on. All recipients received the message notification and not just
the users on Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 4:17 PM
and then turn the notification back on when it subsides. As I re-read this,
that doesn't sound good either. Time to make a decision and stick with it I
guess.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:53 AM
To: Exchange
: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
I appreciate all the feedback. After reviewing the posts, I guess we will
have to re-evaluate the sender notification messages. I'm
Off topic.
With the advent of Klez and various other viruses who spoof the sender we
are starting to get complaints from users who are receiving the sender
notifications messages from our ScanMail virus scanner who did not actually
send any virus. I know we can turn off the notification, but
We did something similar at the University of Cincinnati. I created a
secondary SMTP address of @UC.EDU for all out users. The return address for
our users is their primary SMTP address of @UCMAIL.UC.EDU. If you just
create a secondary SMTP address but don't make it the return address, mail
Exchange 5.5 SP4
We have a backup recover system we built to recover mailboxes. It's running
2000 and we have been able to restore to it, but we have had two occurrences
when we told NT backup to restore to the our backup system, but the back
started shutting down services on the originating
Exchange 5.5 SP4
I'm curious to find out what other Exchange Administrators see for the
Private Info Store database size and what backup solutions that they are
using?
Ours largest Private DB is 70 Gig and we're using Dells PowerVault 110T and
NT backup.
Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems
on largest PRIV.EDB size?
You wanna see my pole? :)
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?
Exchange 5.5 SP4
I'm curious to find out
: 614.251.4515
f: 614.252.2650
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?
Exchange 5.5 SP4
I'm curious to find out what other Exchange
Exchange 5.5 SP3.
Confused! We have about 3032 users on a system and the Private store is
currently 65 Gig. I'm looking at the Mailbox Resources and tallied up the
total K for all users and I came up with 25 gig for storage and an average
of 32 gig per user.
I would have thought that the
retention
2) White space - the stores grow as needed, but do not shrink. If enough
data is deleted to create space it is left as white space unless you
manually compact the database.
3) The resources information is notoriously inaccurate.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete
Andy,
Got it...looks good!
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots
if anyone wants to play with Titanium OWA -
http://216.87.16.88/exchange
logon as
Spell checker failed for some reason.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots
if anyone wants to play with Titanium OWA -
http://216.87.16.88/exchange
You might want to also look at
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3ben-us%3b313576 which is
a 5.5 Post SP4 Outlook Web Access Fix and has a new CDOHTML.DLL as well.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:52 PM
To:
drivers for the SCSI cards have
a bug in them.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:41 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
This might be somewhat of a vague question. We current have a
DellPowervault LTO 110T backup tape drive on our primary Exchange Server.
It will back up 100 Gig non-compressed or 200 Gig compressed. Does anyone
know the maximum size an Exchange DB can be if you use compression on the
tape? I'm
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Backup onto LTO and compression question.
Does it matter?
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED
Well,
We finally called MS on our problem with OWA failing on our 2000 servers and
having to reboot the system to get IIS restarted. Microsoft looked at the
dumps and had us install the Exchange Server 5.5 Post-SP4 Outlook Web Access
Fixes as stated in Q313576. The fix includes files:
the hardware it
went away, but that also included a complete rebuild of the server too.
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:00 PM
Subject: IIS/OWA failing?
Exchange 5.5 SP4
PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 1:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: removal of secondary SMTP address
I apologize if this got posted before. I didn't see
it come through and I checked the archives.
Exchange 5.5 SP4
We are starting
I apologize if this got posted before. I didn't see it come through and I
checked the archives.
Exchange 5.5 SP4
We are starting to experiment putting in a secondary SMTP address for
selected users ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I can add a secondary smtp address using
the Secondary-Proxy-Addresses
We're in the process of locking down ports for our Exchange 5.5 deployment.
I've read the FAQ's and found ports required, but have a couple of
questions.
If you have a Exchange Server with no IMC on it just mailboxes do you need
TCP 25 SMTP enabled. I would think it should only be enabled for
Thanks this is good information as I learn little by little. Our IMC is on
it's own separate box, so that would require port 25. The systems that
house our users do not have a IMC's but pass mail to the dedicated IMC's, so
they don't need port 25.
X.400...since it's used internally by 5.5,
We're using current backups performed on 2000 SP3. Both systems running the
same which has really got me puzzled why it will not read on the recovery
box.
-Original Message-
From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 5:48 PM
To: Exchange
Somewhat off topic.
We recently upgraded our servers to Windows 2000 server with SP3 running
Exchange 5.5 SP5. The systems have DLT 7000's attached to them and I have a
recovery server that I use for restoration that also has a DLT 7000.
After upgrading the boxes to 2000 SP3 (including my
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 2000.
We are finally going to be moving our Exchange deployment into a safe zone.
The servers will be put into it's own secure segment that will have a
firewall for internal and external users. We are requiring users to use a
VPN client if they are coming in from an ISP, but
I've seen a number of the MovieWorld viruses being caught by McAfee but
Trend doesn't seem to see it. Is it another name under Trend?
Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
University of Cincinnati
51 Goodman Street
Cincinnati, OH 45221
Phone - (513) 556-9076
Fax -
Wow! Just looked at pricing. We have a student mail system with 45,000
users which we have no virus scanning software on because it's cost
prohibitive. It's Linux with SMTP so I think I'll look at this for that
system. I might even look at this for our front end IMC's on Exchange as
well for
Exchange 5.5 SP4.
Sorry to post this again. Maybe someone new has some information.
Well the system that processes the @UC.EDU aliases for the University
finally took a big hit. Its a VMS system running PMDF and is run in a
different department. We've been asked to look at alternative
Exchange 5.5 SP4
We just installed a new Exchange 5.5 server under Windows 2000 and are
moving mailboxes onto the new system. I've had a few users who are running
blackice on the desktop that are now stating that their accounts are
receiving a UDP probe from the new mail system and they are
be running Blackice on the desktop? Or do they all have
their
own internet connection?
--
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 20 September 2002 14:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: UDP port probe
have a firewall protecting
your network? are your users afraid of internal attacks?
regards,
Mikko Pludra
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 8:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: UDP port probe after moving
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.
Exchange 5.5 SP4 under NT 2000 SP2.
Well we have
Exchange 5.5 SP4 under NT 2000 SP2.
Well we have our first 2000 server up running Exchange 5.5 SP3. I'm trying
to get the backups to run similar to what I had with NT 4.0. With the 4.0
version I had the cmd set to initialize any tape in the drive, backup and
eject and mail the logs for
not. But here's
a good article that solved this problem for me, and taught me a little
bit about RSM and NTBACKUP and scripting, too:
http://www.jsiinc.com/sube/tip2200/rh2265.htm
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday
Exchange 5.5
I'm a little confused on Reverse DNS. I kind of understand the concept that
with Reverse DNS enabled the Mail from: entry must resolve to a valid domain
or it will get rejected. Some I have some basic questions:
I take it Exchange 5.5 does not support Reverse DNS?
How about
This is a little off-topic. We recently went to a demonstration on
Mirapoint messaging systems. We're looking at Mirapoint as a possible
replacement to our aging student messaging system and potentially as
front-end servers for all incoming messages to the University. I was
wondering if
I was wondering if anyone else is seeing some new type of Spam coming in
from APNIC? This Spam is forging the return address to internal users and
they all have the same subject/content, so they seem to be related.
Save up to 70% on Your Current Term Life Insurance
know not everyone can, but I block all Asian IP ranges. Keeps both my
spam and hack attempts way down.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: APNIC Spam imitating internal users
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6A, IIS 4.0
We recently started encountering a problem with IIS and INETINFO Dr.
Watsoning on us with Event 4097. We ended up rebuilding the entire system
from scratch but we are still encountering the problem. Event as follows:
The application, exe\inetinfo.dbg,
Forgot...we also had the CDO CDOHTML hot fix installed Q289606.EXE for
Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097
Exchange 5.5 SP4
-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097
When did this start? Is there anything else running on this box?
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL
say wipe the box clean and start over with w2k unless you think the box
is overworked, which could be the root of your problem. Looks like you
have the symbols installed, so why not give pss a call?
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
We just cut over to the ESE version about 2 weeks ago. Was a little
reluctant since the initial release of the product had some issues, but that
seems to have been cleared up. We have 6,400+ users on two systems, so
cutting over to the ESE version really reduced the load on the system sense
we
Exchange 5.5 SP3.
I've been instructed to move our Exchange deployment into our DMZ. I
know...I know...VPN, not my decision. We're performing a test and put a
Wins and Exchange server over in the DMZ, created a few test accounts.
We can get in from our private network with no problems. The
corporate?
Also, I am a little baffled. Since when does WINS have
anything to do with Password change?
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:26 AM
Posted
I noticed that Trends Scan Engine is now 6.1, but when I try to update from
the 5.630-1025 via the console it says there are no newer versions. I sent
a message to Trend inquiring on this one, but was wondering if anyone else
is seeing the same issue. Possibly a manual download is require?
You probably should place the limit on each mailbox as well. The MTA only
is used between servers, so this would no apply to users on the same
Exchange server.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Exchange 5.5 sp4.
Here's is my question. We have one PDC which serves as a IMC as well as an
OWA server. We currently have a second system with is our BDC which also
has IMC and OWA on it. Currently both systems have backup tape units and
tapes rotated on the nightly basis.
The BDC needs to
We have the MTA's set for 20 meg. The IMS's set for 20 meg. And we also
have each users profile for a maximum size of 20 meg.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Well,
First let me apologize for the vagueness of this question. Just starting to
read up on Exchange 2000. I've been asked by management to spec out the
possibility of deploying Exchange 2,000 to all users on our campus (40,000
users). I'm reading Tony Redmond's book on Exchange 2000 and it
One change, Our Dells are 6350's not 8650's.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2,000 scalability question.
Well,
First let me apologize
I recall that someone once posted a link to a page that stated the end of
life date for various MS products. I've looked high and low for it and
can't seem to locate it. Went to the archive, looked in TechNet, went to MS
site...but could no find anything. Anyone recall what the link was or
://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle.asp
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: End of Support for MS products link
I recall that someone once posted a link to a page that stated the end
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Got a user that is getting the enclosed error at times when accessing
Outlook. Looking at Technet, I found article Q247972 which states that the
Schedule + Free Busy Public Folder does not have Editor for Default
Permissions. I check the folder and the settings are correct.
I just upgraded our server to NT 4.0 SP6A and Exchange 5.5 SP4.
Now one of our servers that houses the Internet Mail Service seems to stop
processing mail every two weeks or so. My link monitors show the outbound
queue stacking up mail, and when you try to stop the IMS service it says
service
|+---
|| Pfefferkorn, Pete |
|| (PFEFFEPE) |
|| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|| Sent by: |
|| bounce-exchange-148870@ls|
|| .swynk.com
OAR.NET has seen it and issued a warning to us, which is why I posted the
message. NAI states that DAT file 4180 will catch this virus, but their
current dat download is at 4179.
-Original Message-
From: Joe User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:11 PM
To:
I just got a message from OAR.NET referring to a virus alert. Still trying
to find out more about it, but I thought I would post this just in case.
Trying to find out more on this one to see if there is an attachment I can
block.
From: Jodi Santini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: New Virus ShakerWorld variant?
I just got a message from OAR.NET referring to a virus alert.
Still trying to find out more about it, but I
Exchange 5.5. We recently upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in
AVAPI as well as MAPI mode. I'm a little confused on how the AVAPI works
when it comes to cleaning and notifications. I know that you lose the
sender and recipient information and I'm wondering why that is the case? Is
it
Exchange 5.5 SP4.
We have a large number of public folders and I would like to add a user as
an owner of the folders. I'm looking for a way to import that information
versus selecting each folder and manually doing it. I'm familiar with
directory export and exporting mailbox and importing of
If you highlight the server and click on MTA you will see a Message Size
limit which should apply to all users on the server.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Limiting size
. The messages sent between
users on the same server do not hit the MTA and therefore are not affected
by the limits you set at the MTA. In order to achieve what he wants, he has
to set the limits at the mailbox level.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto
Doesn't Scan Mail allow you to replace the attached infected message with a
replacement text file? I just upgraded and I though I saw that feature.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Exchange 5.5 SP4, ScanMail 3.52
We upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in both AVAPI and MAPI mode. I
understand that running AVAPI, you lose the sender/recipient information for
viruses caught in the log files. I'm a little confused on my testing on how
notification works. I sent a
, this is a limitation of the AVAPI. My
suggestion would be to use Scanmail 3.7x which uses ESE based scanning.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic: ScanMail
This is going to be a little off topic, but I thought I would post it in
case someone ran into it as well.
I have ScanMail moving infected files. One of the files that was moved into
the \VIRUS area was a FUN.MP3 that is listed as a short cut. I cannot
delete due to a sharing violation
Not sure about Scanmail having the file locked but have you tried del or
attrib from a DOS prompt?
Allan
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE
dont you stop the services for trend and then delete the file. After
all that just start up the services again.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic
Well I finally bit the bullet and upgraded to ScanMail 3.52. I currently
have it running in AVAPI mode as well as MAPI mode. I was hoping that the
MAPI mode would not create a realscan process for every 200 accounts that it
logs into, as it did in the old version, but looks as if I'm wrong.
, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ScanMail 3.52 AVAPI MAPI mode.
Well I finally bit the bullet and upgraded to ScanMail 3.52.
I currently have it running in AVAPI mode as well as MAPI
mode. I was hoping
: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
Ummm, how about deleting the message?
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
Exchange 5.5 SP4
I finally
message.
Let me know if you find a solution!
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
Exchange 5.5 SP4
I finally figured out what
Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
I'm running ScanMail 3.02. I have it set to delete the attachment if it's
infected. I don't see an option
Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
It's catching the virus and deleting it. The message header
is causing the problem from what I can see
I just got off the phone with Trend about upgrading and they recommended
going to the AVAPI version since they were experiencing problems with the
ESE. I was hoping to upgrade to the ESE later this week. I'll have to call
them back and inquire about what issue they have with their ESE version.
I initiated a block on .SCR extensions in ScanMail. As soon as I initiated
a block I started seeing it. Shit!!! I'm waiting for Trend to get a
pattern, but I would suggest blocking until it's available.
-Original Message-
From: Usachev Oleg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
Just wanted to thank Paul and this list about the warning. I was able to
send out an alert and notify the users (Exchange and non-Exchange) and I
think we avoided some additional problems with the notification.
Thanks again!
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL
I would agree with memory. Had the same thing happen to myself and it
turned out to be a couple of bad dimms. The system totally locked...no
response!
-Original Message-
From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Exchange 5.5 SP4. The last couple of days, two of our OWA servers stop
responding to users requests. Looking at the event logs I found Event ID 5
for the following:
Error: File /exchange/USA/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp Unexpected error
Error: File /exchange/USA/logon.asp Unexpected error
Error:
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
