RE: exchange engineer needed!!!!

[Soysal, Serdar]

Ah, you need someone to rescue you from AOL?

Serdar Soysal



> -Original Message-
> From: Christine Lani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8:35 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: exchange engineer needed
> 
> I am looking for a 2nd to 3rd level exchange engineer for a long term 
> consulting position in New Jersey.  I f you are interested or know 
> anyone who is please contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thanks, Chris


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: WALMART

[Soysal, Serdar]

Ludington is beautiful.  We spent a weekend there last Thanksgiving.  It was
a great weekend retreat.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WALMART


I can understand that.  Ludington (MI) is a small town of 12000 and where I
work, the hospital, is the second largest employer.  So, it's pretty usual
to run into someone that works there no matter where you are.

And, by the way, yes, Ludington does have all the modern amenities, too!

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: WALMART


We have a few account reps that go there all the time to meet with Wal Mart
and they said the city has really come along. THey even have a Movie Theatre
now. The weirdest thing they said is that no matter where you go you see
your co-workers as it is a "Wal Mart" built town. Work AND live together!


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Job Opening Washington DC for Exchange Design Engineer

[Soysal, Serdar]

Well if you're going in with just 3 years experience, it is long term.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Job Opening Washington DC for Exchange Design Engineer


1 - 2 yrs. long term...  ?  

-Original Message-
From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Job Opening Washington DC for Exchange Design Engineer


To who may be interested:

Job:  Exchange Design Engineer
Location:  Washington DC
Type:  Longterm Government Contract
Length:  1-2 years
Pay:  80,000+

We are looking for an experienced Exchange design engineer who has done an
enterprise level (5k seat) design/implementation of Exchange 5.5 and/or
2000.  At least 3-5 solid years of Exchange experience necessary. Relocation
may be worked out.  Needed immediately though.  Groupwise experience a plus.
Please email me offline if interested w/ resume.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook- Macro Problem

[Soysal, Serdar]

You need to subscribe to the outlook-dev yahoo group.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Vijayakumar, T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook- Macro Problem


Hi All,
Through Application_Startup( ) macro I have added some Button in 
Outlook.When we close the Outlook that button should be removed from the
Outlook. That Functionality  i tried in Application_Quit( ) macro but its
giving Error 'cos the Reason is If we closed the Outlook the OOM(Outlook
Object) is destroyed,so the code in the Application_Quit( ) macro is not
executing properly.

Is there any other way to Implement this

Regards

Vijay

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: User passwords...

[Soysal, Serdar]

When you use OWA, the user will be prompted for the password change.  With
POP3, you probably will need to write your own code.  I think this was
covered in the list a few months ago.  There was someone who was trying to
do this for POP3 users, although I don't remember who posted it.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Siegel, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: User passwords...


If I have users who use our systems strictly for Outlook Web Mail, or POP
mail, how can I force them to change their passwords every sixty days, and
have them notified that they should do so?  Is there any way to send out an
email to them, leting them know their password will expire?  Obviously these
users do not log onto the network directly, and would not see the 2000/NT
msg requiring them to do so in X days.

Rich Siegel

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: User passwords...

[Soysal, Serdar]

I found the thread!  It was YOU who asked the question at the time.  Imagine
that.  

Here's an example response from Ryan at the time:

RE: password changing




From: Ryan Malayter 
Subject: RE: password changing 
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 13:40:34 -0800 





http://www.15seconds.com/issue/020130.htm has code samples to get the
information you need using Vbscript.



For the entire thread  go to:
http://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/htsearch?method=and&format=short&config=
exchange_ls_swynk_com&restrict=&exclude=&words=POP3+password+expire

(Link wrappage etc.)

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Siegel, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: User passwords...


If I have users who use our systems strictly for Outlook Web Mail, or POP
mail, how can I force them to change their passwords every sixty days, and
have them notified that they should do so?  Is there any way to send out an
email to them, leting them know their password will expire?  Obviously these
users do not log onto the network directly, and would not see the 2000/NT
msg requiring them to do so in X days.

Rich Siegel

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Wal-Mart

[Soysal, Serdar]

Hmm, yes.  Anyone, please spill all the details about their infrastructure.
Juuust curious.

:-)


-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 June 2002 09:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Wal-Mart


Anyone here working or has worked for Wal-Mart in Bentonville on their email
system?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Irritating calendar problem

[Soysal, Serdar]

Sounds like you got some corrupt appointments in the calendar.  What happens
when you purge the calendar folder (using export, ExMerge or something like
that)?

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Perez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 6:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Irritating calendar problem


To all the Genii out there.your assistance would be truly appreciated.

I have a problem, experienced by a couple of users, that has so far defied
all attempts at resolution.

Running Exchange Server 5.5 SP4, incl. all hotfixes on Windows NT4 SP6a. 
Antivirus:Trend Micro Scanmail for Exchange.

The problem is as follows:  A couple of users are able to access mailbox and
work normally in all folders, except for Calendar and Outlook Today.

As soon as the user selects one of these options, utilization reaches 100%
and remains at this level.  Even after 15-20 minutes, machine remains frozen
until Outlook is cancelled.

The following actions have so far been taken:

1. Attempted to load Outlook using a variety of startup parameters; however
problem remains.

2. Created new mailbox and exported contents of old mailbox to PST.  Then
imported PST to new mailbox, first with contents of calendar and then
without the calendar. However each time calendar is accessed the same
problem occurs.

3. Have attempted to access the mailbox from other PCs and loaded different
versions of Outlook (97,98, 2000 and XP) however the problem remains.

This problem does not affect any other users or any newly created mailboxes.

As a temporary solution, both users are able to use Calendar under OWA.

Any suggestions, recommendationsplease.

Regards
Jonathan



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: slightly OT - Outlook and IE

[Soysal, Serdar]

Both yahoo and hotmail used to be great tools.  Now, it's a hassle to
maintain an account with them.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Ewins, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: slightly OT - Outlook and IE


Yahoo did the same recently.  Must be a conspiracy.  I blame Elvis [1].  But
junk mail relating to mail clients on Exchange?  I think you can relax.
JDE
[1] he denies it.

 -Original Message-
From:   Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Monday, June 10, 2002 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: slightly OT - Outlook and IE


Also related:

If you signed up for Hotmail - or anything else that uses Passport  more
than a couple of months ago, you may be in for a big surprise. It seems that
Microsoft changed the rules while you weren't looking. Unilaterally,
Microsoft may have granted itself permission to pass along your personal
information to other companies that use
Passport on their Web sites.
The personal information includes your email address, your birthday, your
country and zip code, your gender and occupation.
Has Microsoft taken liberties with your data? There's an easy way to check.

Go into Hotmail and log into your account.
Click Options (to the right of the tab that says "Address Book").
Click Personal Profile (in the upper left corner). Scroll down to the bottom
of the screen and see whether the boxes marked "Share my e-mail address" and
"Share my other registration information" have been checked.
UNCHECK THESE!!

Those boxes didn't exist when most people currently signed up for Hotmail,
and chances are
pretty good they didn't exist when you signed up for it, either. I certainly
never gave Microsoft permission to hand out my email address - or my
birthday, gender or occupation. Yet both of those boxes on my personal
profile were
checked. I bet they're checked on your personal profile, too. Worth
checking!

Regards
E.


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: RE: slightly OT - Outlook and IE


Cool. What's the phone number or contact information at Hotmail for me to
contact and get my share of cheap Hotmail e-mail addresses?

-Original Message-
From: Richard Serafin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Subject: RE: slightly OT - Outlook and IE

Yup, I've bought some myself just because I didn't believe it, I had to
try it, 5000 Hotmail address like $29.95

> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Subject: RE: slightly OT - Outlook and IE
> 
> >Hotmail sells your address to them.
> 
> Really. Yes, that must be it.


---

Clearswift monitors, controls and protects all its messaging traffic in
compliance with its 
corporate email policy using Clearswift products. Find out more about
Clearswift, its 
solutions and services at http://www.clearswift.com



This communication is confidential and may contain privileged information
intended solely 
for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the
purpose for 
which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not
copy, distribute 
or take any action in reliance on it. Unless expressly stated, opinions in
this message are 
those of the individual sender and not of Clearswift. If you have received
this communication
in error, please notify Clearswift by emailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
quoting the sender and
delete the message and any attached documents. Clearswift accepts no
liability or 
responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and attachments
having left the 
Clearswift domain.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Hardware Question

[Soysal, Serdar]

If you have limited budget, spend your extra cash on memory.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Cooke, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hardware Question


All,
Our company is buying a new Exchange server. At the start running 5.5
hopefully migrating to E2K sooner rather than later.  I was hoping that
someone may be able to help me decide whether or not to invest in 1MB or 2MB
L2 processor cache rather than buying the 512K L2 cache. This server over
the next 5 years may be supporting up to 1,000 users and if someone could
give me their opinions on whether 1MB or 2MB of cache will be needed or if
the performance gain will even be seen with a server supporting 1,000 users
I'd greatly appreciate it. I've been looking to buy a server with dual 1.8
Ghz/512K processors. I have priced other servers that are far more expensive
with 1MB or 2MB cache. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in
advance, Brian

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: How to prevent end users from using Outlook personalfolders pst

[Soysal, Serdar]

Repeated blows to the head with a fairly large hammer also works.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to prevent end users from using Outlook personal folders
pst


How about denying access to their own hard drives and not allowing to use
any network drives?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 10:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: How to prevent end users from using Outlook personal folders
pst


Modprof from the logon script.  It won't stop them from creating one, but
it'll remove it every time they log on.

John Fullbright
MOSMWNMTK


> Subject says it all.  I know I can remove the mspst32.dll.  But is 
> there anyway to handle this from Exchange.  Or via a policy?
> 
> Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Catch all email sent to my company address

[Soysal, Serdar]

Search the archives for "catch-all mailbox"

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Catch all email sent to my company address


How can I forward all email sent to non-existent mailboxes in my domain e.g.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] , to a particular mailbox. So all email sent to
non-existent personnel in the mycompany.com domain should be sent to this
mailbox

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: It's OT time

[Soysal, Serdar]

Hey!  Some of us are watching those from tape, so don't spoil it!  That
said, the score for England vs Argentina was 

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 5:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: It's OT time



Sweden 2 - Nigeria 1

12.30pm (GMT) England v Argentina

C'MON ENGLAND!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Spam Filtering- How?

[Soysal, Serdar]

FAQ FAQ FAQ FAQ FAQ FAQ FAQ FAQ FAQ

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Spam Filtering- How?


We are using Exchange 5.5 with latest service pack. I have been asked to
find out, how we can do spam filtering. We use Antigen for Exchange as our
AV solution.

Thanks
Davinder

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: How to add a disclaimer on outgoing emails?

[Soysal, Serdar]

Humor us.  Did you even think about searching the archives or lookgin at the
FAQ?

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 3:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to add a disclaimer on outgoing emails?


Hi, I'm trying to create a simple footnote to be added to each outgoing
message for Exchange 5.5 SP4 users. It will be a disclaimer, something
like:

CONFIDENTIAL: This communication is intended for the use of the individual
or entity to which it is addressed. This message contains information from
"YOUR NAME" which may be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure
under applicable law.

 How can I create such a form(template)? Also, how can I make so that "YOUR
NAME" field is replaced by the sender's full name?

Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP6a Server, Outlook 98, 2000 and 2002 clients. 

Thanks!
Tony

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: stupid disclaimers

[Soysal, Serdar]

This is BS.  If you are dealing with confidential information, you treat it
as such.  Unless encrypted, e-mail is transmitted over the Internet in clear
text.  You don't mail confidential documents in transparent envelopes, do
you?  If you can't risk the viewing of the information by unintended
recipients, you don't use simple e-mail to send it.  There are specialized
products out there (like Tumbleweed's Redirector) that are designed to do
this sort of communication.

If you goof up, the disclaimer can't save you.  If you send confidential
company information to a competitor by accident see how fast your company
fires you, even if you had a disclaimer.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers



http://www.emaildisclaimers.com/

"There are several reasons why you might decide to add disclaimers to your
e-mails. The reasons can be categorized into two groups: legal and marketing
reasons. 

1. Legal reasons 

If you were to be so unlucky to be sued for the contents of an e-mail, it is
not certain whether an email disclaimer will protect you from liability in a
court of law. However, it will certainly help your case and in some
situations might exempt you from liability. More importantly, it may well
prevent the actual occurrence of lawsuits against your company since the
mere presence of the statement might deter most persons from seeking legal
compensation from your company. Therefore the use of disclaimers is always
recommended. There are 6 legal threats that disclaimers can help protect
against:

Breach of confidentiality: By including a disclaimer that warns that the
content of the e-mail is confidential, you can protect your company against
the exposure of confidential information. If the receiver breaches this
confidentiality, they could be liable. 

Accidental breach of confidentiality: If an employee were to receive a
confidential mail from someone and by accident forward it to the wrong
person, the employee, and therefore the company, could be liable. This can
easily happen. For instance a wrongly addressed e-mail can be forwarded to a
postmaster, who might not be authorized to read the mail. Furthermore,
e-mail can easily be intercepted. If you include a statement at the end of
your mail that the message is only intended for the addressee, and that if
anyone receives the e-mail by mistake they are bound to confidentiality,
this could protect you.  etc. etc."

-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers


I'm still fighting the battle of "we don't need no stinkin' disclaimers." So
far, I've won.

BTW, has anybody ever heard if those disclaimers actually hold up in court?

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers


Alright, alright.  There.  Fortunately Mailsweeper allows you to bypass by
adding personalmail in the body somewhere.  Are you happy?



-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers


if it's a litmus test

-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers


Does printing the message out and pissing on the paper constitute "action"?

> -Original Message-
> From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
> 
> 
> I'm taking action on your message. I'm taking action on it right now. 
> Nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah.
> 
> Tell your lawyers to get their $49.95 back from "J.D.'s 'R' Us."
> 
> --
> be - MOS

> 
> Noone ever built a statue to a critic.
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
> > 
> > 
> > Do think this was my design?  Our lawyers think we need
> this.  Like it
> > actually performs some kind of function.
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Subject: stupid disclaimers
> > 
> > 
> > I think I might just start blocking messages with moronic 
> > disclaimers before they even get to my system. I feel dumber just 
> > for having read the disclaimer below.
> > 
> > > This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
> > > information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is 
> > > protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you 
> > > should delete this message.  Any disclosure, copying, or 
> > > distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on 
> > > it, is strictly prohibited.


---

Clearswift monitors, controls and protects all its messaging traffic in
compliance with its 
corporate email policy using Clearswift products. Find out more a

RE: Offline Defrag

[Soysal, Serdar]

An offline defrag is the last thing you want to do if you suspect your
database has corruption in it.  If you suspect corruption, build another
server, move your data to that and then figure out what caused the
corruption in the first place.  When you run a database utility against a db
that is potentially corrupted, the risk of not being able to mount your
stores is greatly increased.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Offline Defrag


If you have time on your hands go ahead. Not necessary in my opinion unless
you suspect database is starting to become corrupt.


- Original Message -
From: "John Strange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:00 AM
Subject: Offline Defrag


> What are the best practices for doing an Offline defrag on Exchange 
> 2000?
>
> 1.  How often based on size of databases?
> 2.  Is it really necessary?
>
> -j
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

[Soysal, Serdar]

I think the options for mailbox access:

1.VPN (most secure)
2.SSL to internal OWA 
3.SSL to OWA in DMZ (secure enough, but forces you to allow directory
authentication traffic through your firewall)
4.OWA in DMZ over port 80 (what are you, nuts?)
5.MAPI over Internet (suicidal)

For SMTP traffic, what I would recommend is to deploy a relay host in your
DMZ that also does SMTP virus scanning, preferrably from a different AV
vendor than the one running internally on Exchange so you have two different
engines scanning all incoming messages.  Also configure your firewall so
that the Internet can only do port 25 to your DMZ relay host and only that
host can do port 25 to your internal host.  Also add additional restrictions
to the firewall that nobody but your relay host can make a port 25 to the
Internet.  Last thing you need is an internal bozo to stick an SMTP host in
your DMZ and start spamming the Internet without your knowledge.


Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp


First rule:  Don't ever let internet traffic talk directly to the heart of
your network.  Stick something in the DMZ, be it an SMTP relay or an OWA
box, but never let 'em talk directly to your Exchange box.  The real
question behind determinig SMTP or OWA is (in my opinion) a question of
functionality -- they both do two toally different things.  If you want
users to both send AND receive their email, you'll have to open POP3 in
addition to SMTP ... also allowing account passwords to transmit in plain
text.  If you'd rather keep all the data sitting on the Exchange box, give
the users the additional calendaring, etc. functionality, and encrypt
authentication data -- but at the cost of not allowing users to work offline
-- then OWA is the way to go.
I recommend defining the needs, then making the decision based on that.

> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:26 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp
> 
> 
> Ok, I've got a couple of scenarios, which of them is the least risky?
> 
> Exchange 2000 mailbox server on the LAN, accepting/making
> connections using SMTP through a firewall to the internet
> 
> Exchange 2000 mailbox server on the LAN, accepting SSL
> secured OWA connections from the internet, again, protected 
> by a firewall.
> 
> 
> Basically I am being told I may have to do both with the same
> box, but I'd rather have the smtp traffic going through a DMZ 
> based gateway running McAfee Webshield, and let the OWA 
> clients come into the internal box over SSL (which I see as 
> less of a risk than opening up port 25.
> 
> If you had to choose one of the 2 above scenarios, which would it be?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Rob Ellis
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: A mistake was made...

[Soysal, Serdar]

Mmm... Spanking users

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A mistake was made...


Spank user.


-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A mistake was made...


Outlook 98.  exchange 5.5 sp4

User sent out an eMAIL to a large distribution list by mistake.  The Recall
Message action feature did not work very well on this. This was very
sensitive eMAIL that went out and needs to be trapped before too many people
read it.  What can I do?

Thanks in advance.

Regards,

Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: A mistake was made...

[Soysal, Serdar]

If it's that sensitive, shut down your exchange servers and run ISSCAN.
Reprimand the user.  Cut off his index finger or something.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A mistake was made...


Outlook 98.  exchange 5.5 sp4

User sent out an eMAIL to a large distribution list by mistake.  The Recall
Message action feature did not work very well on this. This was very
sensitive eMAIL that went out and needs to be trapped before too many people
read it.  What can I do?

Thanks in advance.

Regards,

Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Public Folder - drag/drop

[Soysal, Serdar]

There may be no drag/drop accidents but those users are still accident
prone.  Don't leave metal objects near toasters in your lunchroom.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Manning, Tammie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder - drag/drop


 oddly enough users are 'accidentally' dropping stuff in a specific pf
and then freaking out when they realize that the entire firm has seen
something they shouldn't have.  The management figures if we restrict the
drag/drop, then there will be no accidents.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder - drag/drop


lol. Whatever for?

> -Original Message-
> From: TM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Public Folder - drag/drop
> 
> 
> Anyone know a way to disable users from dragging & dropping
> items to a public folder - I want them to be able to post to 
> the folder, but not be
> able to drag/drop items in it.   Thanks!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


IMPORTANT NOTICE:  This message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify Gowlings immediately by email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thank you. 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Public Folder - drag/drop

[Soysal, Serdar]

So you want them to be able to create new items in that folder but not be
able to create new items in it.  I can see the challenge.  

The only thing I can think of is to use a custom post form for that pf,
publish it in that pf and then restrict the pf to accept only that specific
form.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder - drag/drop


Anyone know a way to disable users from dragging & dropping items to a
public folder - I want them to be able to post to the folder, but not be
able to drag/drop items in it.   Thanks!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange

[Soysal, Serdar]

The reasons why I don't do it are:

1. It's unnecessary.
2. I have a life.
3. Unnecessary downtime is frowned upon in a 24x7 shop.
4. I don't need to justify my existence by doing useless administrative
work.

It's like disassembling your car's axles and clean your shocks every weekend
as "scheduled maintenance".  As long as you are careful, it's pretty safe to
do so.  But, why bother?  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange


I'm interested in hearing some sound arguments on why offline maintenance
should *not* be performed ... I've heard/read quite a few people cringing
about it, but can never back it up.  I've been doing it for years without a
hitch; I think as long as the proper precautions are taken and proper
trending and planning is performed instead of just defragging willy-nilly,
it's a pretty safe thing to do.  I'm interested in hearing the other side,
though ... anyone? Jon

> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:42 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
> 
> 
> I'd bet the same people who say not to do exactly what you
> are doing are VERY comfortable with esetuil and isinteg.
> 
> That's precisely why they say *not* to do it.
> 
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Peregrine Systems
> Atlanta, GA
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Scancal.exe

[Soysal, Serdar]

Unfortunately you can only get that from PSS and only if you're experiencing
a specific problem.  AFAIK, that utility was not written as a
general-purpose tool but more for detecting a specific problem [1].

Serdar Soysal

[1] Don't ask me what that specific problem is.  I don't know.


-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scancal.exe


Can a kind soul point me to a place where I can get scancal.exe without the
help of PSS?  Thanks.





This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.  Any
disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any
action based on it, is strictly prohibited.





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange

[Soysal, Serdar]

Explain what you mean by the phrase "rigorous maintenance".  Your
administrative practices may be the root cause of the problem you are trying
to solve.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook appointments on Exchange


We're having a severe problem with a few mailboxes on our Exchange 5.5
server, even though we maintain a rigorous maintenance schedule on our
stores.  A few users (all running Outlook 2000 SR-1) can no longer respond
to any appointment invitations -- doing so causes outlook.exe to fail with a
Dr. Watson access violation error.  Running /cleanfreebusy does not cause
Outlook to hang (as happens when some calendar corruption occurs), but it
doesn't solve the problem, either.  This problem follows the user to other
workstations as well -- it's definitely tied to the mailbox, not the client.
Exmerge can successfully pull down the contents of the mailbox, but I'd
rather not use that to recreate the mailbox because it will break all the
existing appointment links.  TechNet and newsgroup scans have provided zero
solutions ... any ideas, anyone?

Thanks,
Jon

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server

[Soysal, Serdar]

We have a number of the x series that support that configuration.  Their
RAID controllers are very unpredictable and I can't believe the rate of disk
failures. 



Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server


Raid 5e AFAIK incorporates a hot spare into the array by striping unused
white space across the disks.

Makes for faster access times than a raid 5 array + hot spare as the data is
on more "live" spindles.

IBM proprietary.

Evil, evil, IBM.

All the best,

Andy

> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
> Sent: 31. maj 2002 16:28
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
>=20
>=20
> Please share what RAID5e is.  I could only find two hits in=20
>AltaVista on that phrase, and both used character sets not in=20  my 
>workstation.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Outlook Client] Missing fields in appointment

[Soysal, Serdar]

What was the user doing prior to this problem? 

It is possible that the Office keys in the registry is whacked on that PC.
Suggest a reburn.  If you don't want to reburn, you may try uninstalling
Office altogether with the Remove All option, reboot, and try a fresh
install.  It'll probably be faster to just reburn the box though.  

Serdar Soysal

PS: Your disclaimer is pretty dumb.  If you have to put it down because your
legal dept says so, then your attorneys are dumb.


-Original Message-
From: Philippe W. De Roover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: [Outlook Client] Missing fields in appointment



Hello,

One of our users is experiencing a problem with his appointments in Outlook.
When he creates a new appointment, or opens an existing one (already passed
or still to come) no fields are displayed to enter or choose a location or
to select an online meeting service, they are disappeared.

It seems to be machine dependend because the problem doesn't occur if the
user uses another machine, and the problem still occur if other users use
his computer. Office 2000 has been re-installed but didn' solve the problem.

I searched Technet and related sources on the internet but am still unable
to find a solution. (I posted this problem with a screenshot but the message
was rejected).

Did someone see (or just didn't) this before ?

Environment: Windows NT4 SP6 / Outlook 2000 (CW) / Exchange Server 5.5.


Philippe


This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by
telephone and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and
any printout thereof.

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.368 / Virus Database: 204 - Release Date: 29/05/2002
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Where is everyone?

[Soysal, Serdar]

Mmm... World Cup.  Sleepless nights...

Lot of people think Argentina will get this one.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?


Off celebrating the World Cup?

Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981

Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and
its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal.
Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path
leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee



-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Where is everyone?


Where is everyone?  Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I
wasn't invited to?  Or is everyone hung over from the weekend?  Or am I
getting the silent treatment yet again?

Sigh!

-Felicity

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org

[Soysal, Serdar]

If the money that they'll be saving in licensing costs is more than the sum
of the costs of:

1. Purchasing/licensing new software
2. Purchasing support for the new software
3. Purchasing/upgrading/changing hardware (if necessary)
4. Training/Replacing the entire IT staff 
5. Training all of the users
6. Lost productivity during the period the users go through the learning
curve

Then it is a sound business decision.  It is quite possible that this new IT
director has NOT considered all of the above.  You need to do the following:

1. Cancel this IT Director's subscription to PC Magazine
2. Try to beat some sense into him
3. Try to keep him away from Vodka (which can be challenging in the good old
Suomi)

The only alternative is to do what Missy has so wisely suggested.



Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org


All,

Our corporate standards include an NT4 domain and Exchange 5.5 (and has for
several years now).  We have 13 plants located in various countries around
the world.  Our corporate HQ (located in Finland) has hired a new IS
director who has given us a directive that, in lieu of the anticipated
AD/Win2K/E2K rollout, we will be changing our backend infrastructure to
novell e-directory/lotus notes/linux servers!

Now, I am as open-minded as the next guy about the prospect of padding my
resume with all sorts of new applications, but that seems a bit drastic.
Apparently, it all comes down to money.  

Besides, I love my E55sp4 server; it NEVER gives me any problems.

Has anyone else experienced this?  Which would be more painful short-term?
long-term?: the AD/Win2K/E2K or Novell/Lotus/Linux?  I get the impression
that this is a knee-jerk reaction to Microsoft licensing costs.  

Any thoughts, experiences, or warnings concerning this migration would be
appreciated.   

Sincerely,
Joseph Smith
MCSE (NT4 + 2K), CCNA, Network+

Network Administrator
Perlos, Inc.
5201 Alliance Gateway
Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729
Work: 817-224-9012
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IMC will not start

[Soysal, Serdar]

Use IP addresses for forwarding, not names.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC will not start


Windows 2000 Server
Exchange 5.5 Sp3

Our headquaters recently performed a swing upgrade to Windows 2000 with
Active Directory.  Everything appeared to be running Ok until this morning
when the Exchange server rebooted due to a power outage.  Now the IMC will
not start and logs the following error.

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   MSExchangeIMC
Event Category: Initialization/Termination
Event ID:   4057
Date:   5/31/2002
Time:   12:10:21 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   ATREXCHNG
Description:
Unable to resolve the delivery route atrdom;atrcorp;1. Since errors in 
delivery routing parameters  can result in misrouted mail, the Internet Mail

Service will not start until this  error is corrected.  Confirm that DNS is 
properly configured.  If you are using a HOSTS file, confirm that it is 
properly configured.


Transfer Mode: Inbound & Outbound 
Message Delivery: Forward all messages to host
Routing: Set to reroute inbound SMTP.  Has an entry to route the local
domain inbound.

Has anyone dealt with this problem before?  Anything you've got that can
help me point him in the right direction would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Timm

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SMTP message

[Soysal, Serdar]

Nope, that's not it.  It would go without the brackets as well.  His problem
is he needs to change the relay settings in IMS to allow relaying.  

Ed, be careful not to make yourself an open relay if this host is
communicating directly to the Internet.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 5:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP message


Brackets around the rcpt to:<>

-Original Message-
From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 5:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP message


I am using Exchange Server 5.5
I am using an application that establishes an SMTP connection to my SMTP
server and sends an SMTP message to the outside world. The problem is the
message will not be delivered. It appears that the SMTP server will not see
the recipient in its local site and then bounce the message back
undeliverable. Of course the recipient isn't in the local site because it is
an outside email address.

Example of what I am doing.

Telnet mail.stainsafe.com 25

Mail from:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Data

Subject: test message


This comes back undeliverable almost immediately. It appears to me that the
SMTP server is not trying to send the message out, it is looking for the
recipient locally and then rejecting it because the recipient doesn't exist.
How can I have the SMTP server send the message to the MX server of
notmydomain.com? If I am confusing you all I apologize. Thanks for the help.

Ed

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Re Mailbox Access

[Soysal, Serdar]

What is it that you are trying to track exactly?  Logons?  Sent/Received
mails?

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 7:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re Mailbox Access



Hi all,

I need to keep a close eye on access to a particular sensitive mailbox. I am
currently using the native security object access tracking in event viewer.
Any other better utilities or appz with better reporting capabilities out
there?. I am using NT4 Server with Exchange 5.5 with OWA.

Many thanks
Mustafa Ibrahim

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server

[Soysal, Serdar]

Drop your hardware vendor.  Been running my databases on RAID5's on Ed
Crowley's employer's fine line of servers and NEVER EVER had an issue.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server


I apologise for the OT question...

Has anyone experienced issues with bad striping on a RAID5e disk array?
(hardware RAID)

I have had this twice in the last 6 months. When a disk dies in the array it
is replaced ASAP. RAID5e should be able to handle this without error right?

When the RAID5e striping has errors, it registers sectors on the logical
disk as bad and causes disk I/O errors - which screws (eventually corrupts)
the exchange information store(s) on the logical drive and prevents backups
from completing.

hhhmmm ... perhaps someone can enlighten me as to why RAID5e couldn't handle
the occassional defunct drive without screwing the rest of the array in the
process of rebuilding itself...

The hardware vendor has recommended re-creating the RAID array from scratch
and restoring from backup

Any thoughts?

sorry again for the OT question - but I'll even throw in a Friday afternoon
Haiku for good measure:

Friday afternoon
gotta get going home 
server is cactus

Thanks,
MP



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: help

[Soysal, Serdar]

So, don't spam.  If you're not spamming, then what are you doing?

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: help


help !!!
my firewall blocks when sending a mailmerge !!!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Multiple messages

[Soysal, Serdar]

That's because this list has some members with behavioral problems that can
seldom be solved by technological solutions [1].

Serdar Soysal

[1] Hi Ed.


-Original Message-
From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Multiple messages



Anyone else getting the same group of messages sent to them over and over
and over again?  This is the only list I seem to be having this problem
with.





N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
Network Administrator
X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI
Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.xrite.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2000 Fax connectors/solutions comparison

[Soysal, Serdar]

We evaluated Omtool, Rightfax and a bunch of others.  Rightfax seemed to be
the winner at the time.  However, for reasons that I do not wish to (or need
to) disclose the budget was cut and we're stuck with FACSys.  The bottom
line is pretty much anything you get will be better than FACSys.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 3:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 Fax connectors/solutions comparison


If you go to the website for each fax solution. Their comparison always
comes out on top. Gee wonder why. Better to find out which best fits your
goals and needs. I have used both Rightfax and Omtool. Both performed well.
But after all your research you do, your boss will go with the cheapest and
rely on you to make it stable.

- Original Message -
From: "ParthaSarathy, Sriraman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 Fax connectors/solutions comparison


>
> > We currently use Facsys 4.7 with Exchange. Trying to find out more 
> > info whether GFI's Faxmaker or RightFax or some other Fax solution 
> > will be better. Is there any comparison of these Exchange Fax 
> > solutions. Would
be
> > nice if the comparison is recent one with the latest releases 
> > compared. Which one is better integrated with Exchange 2000. TIA.
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Test

[Soysal, Serdar]

That's the initiation ritual for becoming a successful messaging
administrator.  Are you really ready to take the test?

Serdar Soysal



> -Original Message-
> From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 01:03 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: Test
> Subject: RE: Test
> 
> 
> Pardon me for asking, but who is Ed Crowley and why should I
> worship at his feet?
> 
> --Felicity
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Archive

[Soysal, Serdar]

That's as bad as taking technology advice from marketing.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive


What does your Legal department say? Or do they take the lead from IT? [1]

[1] Note to self: quickly run away from any company that takes legal advice
from IT.

-Original Message-
From: Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Archive


How long do most of you hold tapes?  We are looking to establish a standard
on how long to keep tapes in archived before reintroducing them back into
the tape rotation to be overwritten.  I know there are many differnent ways
to look at this as far as cost per tape, storage space, legal aspects, and
disaster recovery and wanted to know what people thought was a good period

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Archive

[Soysal, Serdar]

I sincerely hope that your legal department agrees with the 30 day tape
retention.  A good lawyer once told me that any attorney will have a field
day at court if your e-mail retention period did not match your printed
document retention period.  I tend to agree with that.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive


Dependent on business needs, and for some companies on legal requirements.
Some financial institutions may have to hold some tapes for years.
Officially, I don't keep anything beyond 30 days.  In the unfortunate event
of a subpoena, my job is much simpler.


-Original Message-
From: Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Archive


How long do most of you hold tapes?  We are looking to establish a standard
on how long to keep tapes in archived before reintroducing them back into
the tape rotation to be overwritten.  I know there are many differnent ways
to look at this as far as cost per tape, storage space, legal aspects, and
disaster recovery and wanted to know what people thought was a good period

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: NAV Corporate Ed. ate my e00 log

[Soysal, Serdar]

SpamMan?  I think he deserved what he got.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Fw: NAV Corporate Ed. ate my e00 log


>From the newsgroups.  Need we say more, about scanning Exchange directories.

"Send me your retched spam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Thanks for reading this. Sorry my "newsreader" does not have spell
> check.
> 
> NAV Corp Edition found a virus in/on an e00 log in mdbdata and placed
> it in quarantine, removing it from the mdbdata directory. Now neither 
> public mailbox store will mount on my Exchange 2000 server.
> 
> Any pointers on how to proceed would be appreciated.
> 
> Thanks!
> SpamMan

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Moving Public Folders from E5.5

[Soysal, Serdar]

What if the pf is larger than 2GB?  I suppose using multiple PSTs is an
option.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 1:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Moving Public Folders from E5.5


Export to PST.  Import.
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Underwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:45 PM
Subject: E2K: Moving Public Folders from E5.5


Hi All,

What is the best way to move all PF from Exchange 5.5 SP3 server (NT4
SP6a)
to Exchange 2000 (SBS2K SP2) using a different domain and organization? I
don't care about retaining permissions.  The two server machines are on the
same LAN (same subnet).

Best Regards,
JMU


Jim Underwood
Apollo Information Systems, Inc.
Houston, TX 77058

EMail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Data Retreival from Exchange Database

[Soysal, Serdar]

What do you mean by "overdue"?  Are you talking about Tasks or flagged
messages, or both?  Either way, you probably will have to hire a consultant
to write some custom code for you.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Eric Jenniskens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Data Retreival from Exchange Database


Hi,

We want to loop through the entire Exchange Database to generate management
reports. All items that are overdue or all items with a specific subject
should be reported. Is there anyone who can help us...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Group Mail

[Soysal, Serdar]

It is a candy bar.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail


Pardon me Chris, but what does fsck mean? I am new to this list and
Exchange.

I checked the resource kit and it is not mentioned there.

TIA

--Felicity

> What the fsck is a Group Mail Pro?
> 
> Is it too much to ask for a properly phrased technical question once 
> in a while? Christ on cracker you people...
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:31 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Group Mail
> > 
> > 
> > How exactly does Group Mail Pro send without and SMTP server?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exmerge permissions problem

[Soysal, Serdar]

You don't need to use the service account.  The account needs to have user
permissions on the Recipients container, that's it.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Jutla, Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exmerge permissions problem


try running this from your actual server, the best way is to log in as the
exchange service account onto the server and then use exmerge.  I have
encountered this error below and when I tried runnning exmerge from a
different server - it seemed to work ? - dont know why it worked. :-(

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Recovering a specific mailbox from backup

[Soysal, Serdar]

You may not have liked the suggestions yesterday, but the answer is still
the same.  Read up:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/backuprestore.a
sp

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recovering a specific mailbox from backup



Hi folks,

I need to recover a specific mailbox from backup tapes for exchange 5.5. We
are no longer doing brick-level backup. Can anyone offer any advise on this
as to how I can recover this particular mailbox without interrupting users
on the system. Many thanks. 

Mustafa Ibrahim  

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA and AOL

[Soysal, Serdar]

If you have clients using AOL's browser to connect to your servers, you MUST
have a test box running the same configuration.  Otherwise, all of your
suggestions are shots in the dark.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA and AOL


Has anyone here had any problems with AOL users connecting to OWA?  I have a
few users that are having issues, they can't authenticate.  It isn't the AOL
browser either, I've had them try to use IE when logged in.  I just wanted
to ask prior to setting up a test AOL box, oh the horror.  Is there anything
that can be done to make OWA more friendly to AOL users, or does anyone know
of an AOL config change that has to be done? Thank you in advance, Jer

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longerb eing used....

[Soysal, Serdar]

It is a candy bar.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 5:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b
eing used


What is Scanmail and what is it used for?

Thanks..

-Original Message-
From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer being
used


Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes
that are not currently being used.  Since we are using Trend Micro's
Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her
mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis.  Any help would be
appreciated.

James Casstevens.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE

[Soysal, Serdar]

I guess he meant to send it to the other "exchange" list.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE


Are you on crack?

> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
> 
> 
> To all the girls I've loved before
> Who traveled in and out my door
> I'm glad they came along
> I dedicate this song
> To all the girls I've loved before

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Soysal, Serdar]

Doh!

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


WELL SUPRPRISE SURPRISE GUYS. I have M: and there are some reports that
I can forward you .. I mean my anti-virus software tries to scan the M: and
gets an error thrown... my backup software.. which also uses the disaster
recovery otpion tries to do the same... and it gets an access denied.. and
when I log in with the enetrprise admin as well. and try to check it.. shows
me all the folders of the informtaion store.. but nothing beyond that.. says
that I can see the permissions.. but cant change anything on that... 
I think we should check the microsoft site for more info.. and evidently the
norton anti-virus site recommends that a filter be set on the anti-virus
software to avoid scanning the M:

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard the
possibility of the existence of such a thing.

> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Drive m:
> 
> 
> Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just
> installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly 
> squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our 
> workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Soysal, Serdar]

M: drive just allows access to your Exchange server via the file system
(i.e. Windows Explorer).  Although it may have some applications, I've never
heard of anyone using it extensively.  You definitely can live without it.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Drive m:


Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just installed Exchange
2000 last night and I don't see diddly squat about a drive m:. Note, that
the server (and all of our workstations) already map to a drive we call m:.
Is that the conflict?

Do we need it?

Thanks,

Arch

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: restore exchange to different hardware

[Soysal, Serdar]

The hardware can be different.  You just need the same O/S and Exchange
level (version, sp etc).  The only thing that might go wrong in your case is
that the previous system had a multiprocessor HAL, and the new one will be
single proc HAL.  

Obviously, you'll need the same server name, site name etc. etc.

See
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/backuprestore.a
sp

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: restore exchange to different hardware
Importance: High


Hello, 
Last night our server crashed. We have all backups i think, but we are not
able to buy excatly same HW configuration for new server (it was 2proc tyan
thunder k7). We want to restore uor server from backups to a different
machine whis is 1 proc, AMD Athlon. Is it possible to restore it to that
machine ? 

If yes can anyone point me to some documents describing this scenario ? 

Thanks a lot for any advice 

Bye, Honza Novak

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exch2k server move

[Soysal, Serdar]

He just likes the idea of pain.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exch2k server move


You lost me

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/
For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Pinquist
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exch2k server move


So we are going to do the big move to day, and naturally things are managing
to get complicated.  Can anyone tell me if there is a difference between
deactivating the original server, adding the new one to the proper security
group memberships to do a setup.exe /disasterrecovery and then restoring the
DBs, rather than doing a system state restore on the new machine off the
network, dropping the old machine, bringing the new one up on the network
and doing the setup /disasterrecovery?  An ms whitepaper recomended the
latter, while an ms tech recommended the former.  It seems to me it'd be
easier to leave the computer accounts and group membership the same...

Jeremy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus/Spam filtering

[Soysal, Serdar]

The original question (that was violently snipped) asked about both content
and virus scanning (hence the subject line "Virus/Spam filtering").  It is
true that TrendMicro is very good on the virus scanning side, its eManager
plug-in is just a mediocre content filter.  For virus scanning, Sybari's
Antigen is just as good.  You can't go wrong with either product.  I believe
Antigen has content filtering now as well, but I haven't tested it yet.

For content filtering all of the three below are decent:
- MIMESweeper: they are the leader in this field.  Very strong product.
- Praetor: good/cheaper alternative to MIMESweeper.  The next version will
be based on Transport Event Sinks which they claim gives them a big
performance boost.  The downside is it will require Win2K
- MMS from Tumbleweed Communications: they are MIMESweeper's top competitor
and this is the only product that has a comparable feature set AFAIK.
However, their support is pretty much non-existent

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: randomfire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 12:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Virus/Spam filtering


Trendmicro's products are the best out there for exchange. I absolutely
suggest you go with their product...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Recovering a specific mailbox from backup

[Soysal, Serdar]

Make sure that the data that is to be recovered is more valuable to business
than the cost of recovery before proceeding.  Digest all the info in the
fine link Mr.David provided while management is chewing on that.

-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recovering a specific mailbox from backup



Hi folks,

I need to recover a specific mailbox from backup tapes for exchange 5.5. We
are no longer doing brick-level backup. Can anyone offer any advise on this
as to how I can recover this particular mailbox without interrupting users
on the system. Many thanks. 

Mustafa Ibrahim  

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Recommendations for Message size limits?

[Soysal, Serdar]

This horse was beaten to death, revived and beaten to death again.  Archives
are your best friend.  Basically the summary of all advice given on the
subject is: the best limits are those that accommodate your business needs.

EP II was good.  It's not Harry Potter in space like the first one.  The
only scenes that I hated were the romantic scenes on Naboo.  I almost
expected to hear the soundtrack of "Sound of Music".

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Scott Pease [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 4:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recommendations for Message size limits?


Just curious, anyone know of any whitepapers/documents/articles/etc
recommending message size limits?  We're running with 5M across the board
(IMS/MTA/mailbox) on our 5.5 system until we make the move to E2K (God, I
hope soon!) and have the advantage of more management of large messages
(scheduling, etc).  Been there, done that with the Notes from the Field
books and all - apparently MS "recommendations" or offered guidance isn't
good enough for TPTB.  ;-)

Thanks all, time to go see Ep II for me :)


Scott
Scott Pease
Messaging Architect - Sapient
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AOL / MSN / Yahoo / Jabber IMs:  AragornSoS
 
200 West Adams Street, Suite 2700
Chicago, IL 60606
W: 312.458.1863
C: 312.961.8216 
"Centuries ago words were written to be a call and a spur to the faithful
servants of Truth and Justice: "Arm yourselves, and be ye men of valour, and
be in readiness for the conflict; for it is better for us to perish in
battle than to look upon the outrage of our nation and our altar. As the
Will of God is in Heaven, even so let it be."  ~ Winston Churchill, 19 May
1940, first broadcast as Prime Minister of Great Britain



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Internet Mail service lockups

[Soysal, Serdar]

If one of them is forwarding mail to the other, it is possible that the same
message caused both engines to fail.  I would bump up the diagnostics
logging on IMS on both boxes and see if anything gets caught in the event
logs.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Internet Mail service lockups


Good morning to you all:

I've recently had a rash of IMC failures on two different boxes.
Both are Exchange 5.5 SP4, on NT 4.0 boxes running SP6a. One server is
running Nemex, and the other is an internal IMC so it has no virus scanning
capability.

The lock ups happen at different times and seem to effect only the
Internet Mail Connector. When we try to shut down the service, NT pops up a
message saying that the service can't be controlled in it's present state;
however, the box will shut down normally and reboot.

Any advice will be appreciated.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 

Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind,
and those who mind don't matter.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronousr ead page checksum error -1018 ?

[Soysal, Serdar]

Glad to hear that your problem is being resolved.

Here is some good reading on the -1018 errors.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q314917

Serdar Soysal


> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:51 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) 
> Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
> 
> 
> I just got off the phone with them. I don't know why everyone
> bitch#s about Microsoftthat guy could not have been 
> nicer. He confirmed my problem and is helping me get it fixed 
> as I type this.
> 
> Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.
> 
> Arch
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 7:41 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196)
> Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
> 
> 
> 1018 errors? Oh oh.
> I would call PSS. Dont wait on us.
> 
> 
> Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and
> main phone number have changed however we have not moved.
> 
> T. U. Parks Construction Company
> P.O. Box 3308
> Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308
> Phone:423-648-3800
> 
> If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office
> personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus/Spam filtering

[Soysal, Serdar]

The following are two good products for gateway level content filtering.

MIMESweeper from ClearSwift www.clearswift.com
Praetor from Computer Mail Services www.cmsconnect.com


Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 9:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus/Spam filtering


I have been given the task of finding and evaluating a SMTP Virus/Spam
filter for our company.  What products do you recommend?  We are running one
exchange server with about 700 mailboxes.  We want to go gateway scanning so
that the scanner is not residing on the exchange server. The two products we
have been looking at in particular are Interscan Virus wall suite by Trend
Micro and MailMarshall by Marshall software. Any suggestions/recommendations
would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Ryan





N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
Network Administrator
X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI
Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.xrite.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Calendar Problems

[Soysal, Serdar]

You're not running Mailbox Manager against that calendar by any chance are
you?

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Calendar Problems


Perhaps an obvious question:  have you checked the default permissions?

-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Calendar Problems


All,

I have a few admin assistants that are using a public folder calendar to
book conference rooms.  We are having problems with recurring meetings
dropping off the calendar.  All the admins have "Author" rights.  So
obviously they can only delete their own items.  None of them are saying
that they are deleted any of these meetings.  I'm sure all Network admins
have heard that before.  But if they are right.  How can I resolve this
problem so the recurring items don't disappear?  Thanks everyone.

___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: PST files larger than 2GB

[Soysal, Serdar]

I believe the 32TB number was announced in the last MEC.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB


32 TB??? 

The unlimited version of Exchange will only support 16 TB.

Details! Sources! 

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981

Communications without intelligence is noise; Intelligence without
communications irrelevant -- Gen. Alfred M. Gray, USMC


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB


32TB and likely none of the currently shipping versions.

> -Original Message-
> From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:39 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: PST files larger than 2GB
> 
> 
> Maybe I am going mad but I am sure somewhere on this list
> someone mentioned Microsoft were developing pst that had 
> unlimited capacity (or certainly more than the current 2GB) 
> is this true? What version of Outlook will support these 
> larger personal folders?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Paul

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: mobile messaging and MIME format problem

[Soysal, Serdar]

Click on the Options button when you're sending the message, and there is a
combo box for encoding.  The default value for it is Auto-Select, but you
can change it.

However, if you're encrypting stuff, it is possible that the receiving end
can't decrypt it.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mobile messaging and MIME format problem


I do not see any option to set uuencode for a message. The only thing I have
is rich text plain text and html. Also, in outlook I do see a place where it
is sending the messages using s/mime but I cannot turn that off or change
it

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: mobile messaging and MIME format problem

[Soysal, Serdar]

Try UUENCODE.  You can set that in Message Options.  If that works you can
set the same thing on the server for that domain. 

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: mobile messaging and MIME format problem


Using exchange server 5.5 and outlook 2000 at work. Need to start using my
mobil messaging on my US Cellular phone. When I send anything from work I
can see who it is from but when I try to read it I am told that the message
is in MIME format and cannot be read. In my outlook settings I have it set
to send in all 3 options (plain text, MS outlook rich text,
HTML) and this fixes nothing. I can get messages is I send them from my
mediacom account as well as from hotmail. What am I missing on the exchange
server? Please let me know if you have any ideas at all. Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Interesting Storage Solution

[Soysal, Serdar]

I wonder how the product behaves when you perform a restore or run a utility
like ESEUTIL.  How about virus scanners etc. etc.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Interesting Storage Solution


This product doesn't make much sense to me. It trades management and backup
of one database (Exchange) to management and backup of 3 databases
(Exchange, the SQL "file pointer" database, and the Max Attach filesystem).
More points of failure without much more capability.

If you have problems with exchange DBs getting too big, I think there are
better, cheaper, more manageable solutions (Mailbox manager, adding more
servers or storage, even ExMerge) available.


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 7:53 AM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: Interesting Storage Solution
Subject: Interesting Storage Solution


Has anyone seen this in production?

http://www.maxtor.com/products/maxattach/products/applicationspotlights/
nas4
100technicalspotlight.htm (link will probably wrap)

http://www.maxtor.com/products/maxattach/products/6000/storage_solutions
.htm


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery

[Soysal, Serdar]

What on earth are you talking about?  Chris simply pointed Frank to the FAQ,
he said nothing about renaming a BDC.  Besides, since when is it impossible
to rename a BDC?  Why don't you do a search on Technet before you spit
something out?

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery


Chris you cannto rename the BDC.. the best way I would suggest is to disable
the network and have everything as the production environment and to connect
to the network with the same name and all that in case of a failure. 

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 6:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery


I believe there are links to the disaster recovery whitepapers in the FAQ.

> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:16 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery
> 
> 
> Is there a step by step method of how to restore from an
> online backup to a test exchange server? The way I've tried 
> to do it is to build DR server similar to roigin in config 
> but not Spec, ie different manufacturers. Installed NT 4 sp6 
> and made it BDC. Connected the BDC to live network to pull 
> acccount info, having given it a name different to the live 
> Exchange box. Once account info is on box, disconnected from 
> live network and installed Exchang 5.5, sp4 and restored databases.
> 
> Problem is when I get to the point of rename DR box to live
> box on the test network the NT accounts disappear and I get stuck.
> 
> Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Winnt 4 SP6

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Problems with emails on Exchange 5.5

[Soysal, Serdar]

Talk to your new ISP and see if they have any restrictions on message sizes.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problems with emails on Exchange 5.5


We did a couple of changes on our network (ISP change, IP address change,
added firewall), soon after that we started to have undeliverables emails
when emails have more than 1Mb attach. Now we have same problem but with all
emails with attachments (no matter the size). It's on and off, I mean
sometimes it delivered the email and sometimes it won't.

Any ideas about what can be the problem?

Thanks.
Jorge Cardenas.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Non delivery Receipts for users with in the same server

[Soysal, Serdar]

What service pack level are you using?  Check to see if this happens when
someone does a reply-to-all to a message in their Sent Items folder.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Kumar Pillai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 6:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Non delivery Receipts for users with in the same server


All Gurus

In our Exchange 5.5 setup, we occassionaly get NDR's when users try to send
emails to users with in the office. This mostly happens when they try to
send it to Distribution lists.The users get a NDR mail similar to this

"Unable to deliver the message due to a communication failure  The MTS-ID of
the original message is "

Sometimes they get like this

"The message was undelivered because the specified recipient postal address
was incorrect. MSEXCH:MSExchnageIS ..."

Any advise is highly appreciated


Thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery

[Soysal, Serdar]

Read this:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/backuprestore.a
sp

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery


Is there a step by step method of how to restore from an online backup to a
test exchange server? The way I've tried to do it is to build DR server
similar to roigin in config but not Spec, ie different manufacturers.
Installed NT 4 sp6 and made it BDC. Connected the BDC to live network to
pull acccount info, having given it a name different to the live Exchange
box. Once account info is on box, disconnected from live network and
installed Exchang 5.5, sp4 and restored databases.

Problem is when I get to the point of rename DR box to live box on the test
network the NT accounts disappear and I get stuck.

Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Winnt 4 SP6


Any ideas?

Frank  



___
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is private,
confidential and may also be legally privileged . If you are not the
intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for delivering the
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its
attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us by telephoning on 
+44 (0)207 459-3600.

When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email
are for their use only and are  subject to the terms and conditions
expressed in the governing Durlacher client engagement letter.  Durlacher is
a member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service
is powered by MessageLabs.
__

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Conference Board Calendar

[Soysal, Serdar]

You probably have a corrupt calendar entry in there.  Set up a profile for
this conference room, open the PST, switch to By Category or By Recurrence
view and copy only the NON-RECURRING meetings back into the original
calendar.  Then you can start looking for the culprit recurring meeting [1].
Look for meetings with lots of exceptions or blank subject lines or that
have a conflict icon next to it.  

Serdar Soysal

[1] It is a recurring meeting 99% of the time.


-Original Message-
From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Conference Board Calendar


Hello everyone,
We are currently running exchange 5.5 SP4. Recently all of
our users including the exchange admin account are unable to open the
conference room's calendar to view who has booked the room. Everyone can
request the conference room and only the receptionist is able to view the
conference room's calendar to accept and reject the requests. Even she can
only do it for one day that is just for today. If she tries to look it up
for tomorrow or next week, then it just hangs, and I see that it tries to
Synchronize for hours. This issue just started recently as far as I know.
What can I do to resolve this issue? Please help. I even tried to recreate
the mail box and it doesn't work. Meaning, even after I created a .pst file
and put the data back into the new mail box that I created, it still does
the same thing..it just freezes up if you try to look up the information for
more than one day. Any way to clean this up or resolve this issue. 
Thanks everyone.

rama

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Information Store failed to start

[Soysal, Serdar]

Would you STOP asking the same question a gazillion times?  Everybody got
your message the first time!

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Andy Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store failed to start




Information Store has failed to start with the follwing errors being
recorded in NT Event View:

1201 MSExchange - Error 0x8004010f reading\decrypting the (Type) attribute
from the Microsoft Exchange Server Directory Service 5000 MSExchangeIS -
Unable to initialize the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service (Error
0x8004010f.

Ran the tests as stated with TechNet. 
Have now restored but am still receiving the same errors.

Any ideas?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Information Store failed to start

[Soysal, Serdar]

What happened prior to this problem starting?  Any service pack upgrades
etc?  Take a look at Q185573 to see if it rings a bell.  

Either you have a corrupt db and it was backed up that way, or there is
something messed up with the machine you're restoring to.  Either way, you
may want to call PSS now.  

Serdar Soysal

PS: It is sad when your disclaimer is longer than your message.


-Original Message-
From: Andy Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store failed to start


Hi

Information Store has failed to start with the follwing errors being
recorded in NT Event View:

1201 MSExchangeIS - Error 0x8004010f reading\decrypting the (Type) attribute
from the Microsoft Exchange Server Directory Service 5000 MSExchangeIS -
Unable to initialize the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service (Error
0x8004010f.

Ran the tests as stated with TechNet. 
Have now restored but am still receiving the same errors.

Any ideas?



Confidentiality Notice

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may also
be legally privileged.  It is intended for the addressee only. Access to
this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised.  
It is not to be relied on by any person other than the addressee without our
prior written approval.  If no such approval is given we will not accept any
liability 
(in negligence or otherwise) arising from any third party acting or
refraining from acting on such information.  
Unauthorised recipients are required to maintain 
confidentiality.  If you have recieved this e-mail in 
error please notify us immediately, destroy any copies 
and delete it from your computer system. Copyright 
in this e-mail and any document created by us is and will remain vested in
us and will be transferred to you. We assert the right to be identified as
the author of and to object to any misuses of the contents of this e-mail or
such documents

General Information

This e-mail has been sent from Pictons Solicitors.
A list of partners is available for inspection at 
28 Dunstable Road, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU1 1DY or at
any of Pictons' offices.
Pictons is a firm regulated by the Law Society.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Creating rule based on a second mailbox

[Soysal, Serdar]

How about using a public folder for your support mailbox?

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 5:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Creating rule based on a second mailbox


Good day,

I am running exchange server 5.5 with outlook 97 and
2000 as client. I am the owner of two mailboxes my
personal one, and the other for support calls. My
query is whether it is possibe to create a rule that
will move mails from this support mailbox to another
designated recepient mailbox. This is possible with my
personal one, if not possible how so.

 Thanks
Eve


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus Attack ??

[Soysal, Serdar]

One user or multiple users?

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus Attack ??


Hi

Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate
mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried
everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP

Fioon

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Macintosh Denied Access to Public Folders

[Soysal, Serdar]

Although that may be the most practical solution, it may be required for a
specific business need (like having a cool looking computer on the front
desk etc.)

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Macintosh Denied Access to Public Folders


Get rid of the Macintosh was the first one that came to my mind

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris H
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Macintosh Denied Access to Public Folders


I have one  Macintosh on our network. He
can get his mail from the Exchange Server just fine (XCH 5.5 SP4) using the
latest Mac version of Outlook. He is denied from viewing the public folders
even though his mailbox is in the default group that has permissions to view
all the public folders like every other user we have.

Any ideas?

"Beaten paths are for beaten men."
Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: script log files

[Soysal, Serdar]

I doubt it.  I would suspect they are stored in the Events_Config folder
along with the script.  They do overwrite after a certain size, but I don't
know exactly what that limit is.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: script log files


You mean Event Service agent log files?

Can't remember where those are. But if you search your whole drive for most
recently modified files you should come across one of those :)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 2:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: script log files


I need to know the default location of the agent script log files.  Does
anyone have any idea? As well as if the log file continues to grow in size
or writes over after a size limit?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Macintosh Denied Access to Public Folders

[Soysal, Serdar]

Can he hit those public folders from a windows based PC or OWA?

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Macintosh Denied Access to Public Folders


I have one  Macintosh on our network. He
can get his mail from the Exchange Server just fine (XCH 5.5 SP4) using the
latest Mac version of Outlook. He is denied from viewing the public folders
even though his mailbox is in the default group that has permissions to view
all the public folders like every other user we have.

Any ideas?

"Beaten paths are for beaten men."
Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

[Soysal, Serdar]

The only thing I would add to this is use good quality hardware.  If you
have good quality hardware and are proactive in monitoring the health of
your hardware along with all the other recommendations in the fine link that
Andy provided, you'll be ok.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 7:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY


First go here:
http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a
sp
Good practices and good hardware will keep you out of grave danger. Using BE
is a good start. (Make sure its the latest ver) Additionally, you should
grab an old workstation and test your tape backups and your restores skills
frequently.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 6:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY


We recently had an issue where we had to rebuild exchange 5.5 and restore
mailbox's etc back into it. We suffered considerable downtime which has now
possed the question of disaster recovery.

We have a domain with a pdc and bdc (NT4 server) and have created a bdc off
site which is part of the domain and is synchronising remotely. I need to
come up with a good disaster recover for the exchange server.

We are using veritas backup which is backing up private store, public store
and one other folder. Could someone suggest the best way of handling this.
The exchange server cannot be taken offline. I have looked at exmerge but am
not sure if this would copy permissions etc if the edb's are in use.

Is there a way of creating a second exchange 5.5 remotely and mirroring the
accounts of the original exchange. (Exact copy - but the backup exchange
server does not function unless the other one goes down.)

Please help - I am in grave danger.
Thanks
Mike

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

[Soysal, Serdar]

Leave Gary alone.  He's been a good resource to a lot of people.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY


Dear Slinger,

We should not make fun of anyone. If you don't have any solution please
don't show your presence with meaning less statements.

Thanks and Regards.
Irfan Malik

 -Original Message-
From:   Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, May 14, 2002 4:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

Ooh!  Ooh!  Look everybody, it's "URGENT" and he posted it twice!

Jeez...

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY


We recently had an issue where we had to rebuild exchange 5.5 and restore
mailbox's etc back into it. We suffered considerable downtime which has now
possed the question of disaster recovery.

We have a domain with a pdc and bdc (NT4 server) and have created a bdc off
site which is part of the domain and is synchronising remotely. I need to
come up with a good disaster recover for the exchange server.

We are using veritas backup which is backing up private store, public store
and one other folder. Could someone suggest the best way of handling this.
The exchange server cannot be taken offline. I have looked at exmerge but am
not sure if this would copy permissions etc if the edb's are in use.

Is there a way of creating a second exchange 5.5 remotely and mirroring the
accounts of the original exchange. (Exact copy - but the backup exchange
server does not function unless the other one goes down.)

Please help - I am in grave danger.
Thanks
Mike

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2000 Private Store Permissions

[Soysal, Serdar]

This is like giving them a desk and telling them not to ever use the
drawers.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Allen Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 Private Store Permissions


I'm looking for a way to prevent users from creating new folders under their
Exchange 2000 mailbox on my server. We'll be providing training that
'directs' them not to, but I want to keep them from doing it anyway. Which,
of course, they will try to do. Is there a way to prevent the creation of
new folders in addition to the default mailbox folders in Exchange 2000?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Telnet troubleshooting

[Soysal, Serdar]

When your server makes a connection, it sends the entire command and
carriage return (that is HELO) in a single packet.  When you make a
connection via Telnet and start keying in the command, the other server
receives each keystroke in a different packet.  

It seems like the receiving server assumes that all commands must be
contained within a single packet.  I don't know if that's how Merak server
is supposed to work or if they put some kind of restriction in there for a
false sense of security.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Telnet troubleshooting


My domain is privateconsulting.com at 208.187.29.85.  Target domain is
geostarcorp.com at 141.209.244.5.  When I check both sites on
www.checkdns.org, both mail servers appear to be operating normally.  The
original issue I was checking was that geostarcorp is claiming
privateconsulting.com's mail server was rejecting some of their messages.

David

-Original Message-
From: Jerzy Setmajer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Telnet troubleshooting


Give us info:
Source IP
Destination IP

So we can cross check it
> 
> From: "David Florea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2002/05/13 Mon PM 02:43:50 EDT
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Telnet troubleshooting
> 
> In trying to troubleshoot an SMTP issue, I'm telnetting to an outside 
> mail server (they're running Merak Mail).  Their mail server answers, 
> but when I try to send an HELO, with each character I hit I get a "502 
> 5.5.1 command unrecognized" -- after about 8 tries I get a disconnect 
> and a "too many bad attempts" error message, but it looks like that 
> response is coming from the outside address of my router.  This works 
> with other domains, so I'm wondering why this happens and if it's 
> really my router complaining or not.
> 
> David
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?

[Soysal, Serdar]

Yes.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?


Thx.

Havent loaded up E2K yet...I'll assume by part of the thread that E2K could
do this?

thx
bill

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?


he says he's on 5.5, the only way to create a different store there is by
installing other servers :)

-Original Message-
From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?


create different mailbox stores for each group and then set the limits per
store.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?


OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size
restrictions for different groups of users?

I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to
get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for
everybody

But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their
restrictions.

so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group.

Exch55sp4
NT4sp6a

ideas?

thx

Bill

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Spam Filter Suggestions

[Soysal, Serdar]

If you're thinking about deploying content filtering software you must have
one of the following:

1. 1-2 hours a day of free time
2. Enough budget to hire a part-time employee

The content filtering product is only as good as how much time you spend
refining your rules.  Very boring and shtty job.  If you do end up deploying
it, delegate the maintenance of filters to someone you don't like.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Louanne Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Spam Filter Suggestions


Does anyone have recommendations on good spam filtering software?  We are
currently using ScanMail and are looking at their Emanager product but I
wanted to know if there are other products we should look at.

Thanks!

Louanne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Forests prep domain prep

[Soysal, Serdar]

If you don't run them prior to the Exchange setup, they do run automatically
in the background.  That's probably why your Exchange install took such a
long time.  In larger forests where you have multiple domains/trees, it is a
better idea to run forestprep and wait a while until schema changes are
replicated to all DCs and then run domainprep and Exchange server setup.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep


OK so if I successfully installed exchange these ran automatically!!

-Original Message-
From: Schneider, Bryan D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep


No, can't install exchange until these are run in your AD forest/domain.

-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forests prep domain prep

Can these be run after exchange 2k is installed?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Changed the primary windows nt account

[Soysal, Serdar]

No, just wait 2 hours.  Or do the registry hack that is documented in the
Exchange 5.5 FAQ item 3.46.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed the primary windows nt account


Are you using exchange 5.5 if so go into the mailbox properties and change
the primary account back to the old one or check the permissions on the
mailbox of that user.

-Original Message-
From: David Fortuna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Changed the primary windows nt account

I changed the primary windows nt account.  When I tried to change it back to
the original person it works  but that person cannot get into there e-mail
folder, it says they do not have permission.  It shows there name as the
primary Windows NT account. Does it take time to sync?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Haiku Friday

[Soysal, Serdar]

You wrote not haiku
Not that hard writing it is
Why you no haiku?

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Jerzy Setmajer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Haiku Friday


Lovely,
I was wondering what was the delay, Expected someone to start around lunch
:=)

> 
> From: "Blunt, James H (Jim)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2002/05/03 Fri PM 04:04:47 EDT
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Haiku Friday
> 
> Friday blues, once more...
> Nice day, no concentration
> Need to go home early.
> 
> To be young again...
> Thoughts of summer vacation
> running through your head.
> 
> Hanging out with friends...
> Fishing down on the river,
> Barefoot in the grass.
> 
> If you could combine
> lazy days of summer youth
> with older wisdom...
> 
> Oh yeah!  I know how!
> Some call it retirement.
> Wish I had more money.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Friday Haiku

[Soysal, Serdar]

Gotta love the StIcK
Best tool you can ever pick
For your daily kick

Serdar Soysal
PS: This haiku sucks, but I'm gonna post it anyways.  Just to piss all of
you off.

-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 4:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday Haiku


I have gone insane
The StIcK is required
HelpDesk must die now

-Original Message-
From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 3:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Friday Haiku

Just three more minutes
And my intense searching will
be over for two days

-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Warren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 3:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5/Win 2k/SSL


I have done some intense searching for info on how this is done but no one
seems to have the answer.


Warren J. Bennett

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Re Personal Mail Archiving

[Soysal, Serdar]

Put it on a ZIP drive.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re Personal Mail Archiving


That won't work - CD's are read only. You need R/W access to the PST. You
might be able to do it with an RW disk though (I haven't tried it).

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re Personal Mail Archiving

Just make a folder on the cd and move the messages to that folder on the cd.


rich

-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re Personal Mail Archiving



Hi all,

Guys, I got a lot of technical/knowledgebase type messages I have compiled
over the last couple of years I wana archive these and have them accessible
on self-contained CD-ROM. So, when I require access to these messages, I can
just use the CD without the need for outlook personal folder configurations,
etc. Is there some sort of self executable app or utility that will allow me
to do this on a cd? or is there another way. Thanks very much.

Mustafa

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Reminder question

[Soysal, Serdar]

There is a calendar reminder script in the sample code library of
cdolive.com.  You can tweak that to your needs.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Reminder question



This is a silly thing, a user would like their reminders in the form of a
email rather then a reminder popup on a paticular appointment.  The
appointment contains other people and also some people need to attend that
don't have calendar(pop clients).

Is it possible to automate a reminder email for an appointment and specify
who that goes out too beyond the people who have it scheduled?

Happy Friday
E-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cerification question

[Soysal, Serdar]

There you go.  You're hired.  Oops.  Didn't mean to place a curse on you
like that.  Sorry.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Cerification question


Well, I just realized that my three current favorites really aren't chick
flicks, so maybe I misspoke.  But there's no Monty Python, so...

1.  Dogma
2. Apollo 13
3.  12 Angry Men

They may up my estrogen allotment when they find out about this, though...

- Original Message -
From: "Randal, Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:15 AM
Subject: RE: Cerification question


Go on, tell  us, and we can put it to the test :-)

Phil

-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK

> -Original Message-
> From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 02 May 2002 16:05
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Cerification question
>
>
> That is so not fair.  I doubt that my three favorite movies would 
> endear me to a group of men, who tend to be a bit more, shall we say,
> neandrathal, in their choices.
>
> M

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cerification question

[Soysal, Serdar]

This may sound odd but there is one golden question that will tell you
exactly if the candidate will fit the group or not: "What are your three
favorite movies?"  If the person likes similar movies as the general team
and sounds smart, than he/she is a good buy.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question


I deal with (new and different) people daily who have "worked with Exchange
for years" but don't know their database from their check file. I wouldn't
let them within 20 feet of any Exchange server that I worked on but they are
the hired "Exchange expert" for their company.  The fact is that people are
people, and certified people are not inherently better than experienced
people or vice versa.  I think that the best bet is the person who realizes
that, regardless of how much he knows, he does not know everything and is
always willing and wanting to learn more than he currently knows.

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:43 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Cerification question
Subject: RE: Cerification question


Very good points. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question


You people talk like you can't have both. Sure there are some paper MCSEs
out there but there are also many MCSEs that have mucho experience.  Most
hiring managers, all things being equal will look at experience first but...
then certs.  Additionally while experience is the best there are people that
have worked in one environment for so long that they know NOTHING about any
other capabilities of the hardware/software.  They are nearly as bad as the
paper MSCE because the scope of their knowledge is so very limited and
because of their experience think the only way to run a network is the way
they did it at their last job.  At least the Paper boyz know they are
limited, are willing to learn, cost half as much and don't cause half the
drama the "experience" guy does.  They piss me off so much more, that and
they usually have no idea as to WHY their last network was set up that way
but that it is just the best way.  Experience is NOT always the best
qualifier either

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cerification question

[Soysal, Serdar]

Certs are not a sign of competency.  They just mean that the person is
capable of memorizing braindumps.  I interviewed MCSEs that answered the
question "Explain your NT domain structure in your previous job" with an
answer like "We had ATM coming to the back of our PCs".  You've got to be
careful with MCSEs that come with huge resumes.  There are some ways you can
tell if they're good or not though.  For example if the candidate writes
MCSE with a larger font than his own name, you probably have a clueless
wall-licker in your hands.

If a person doesn't have certification, it means that he/she has not sat
through the tests.  That person can be the most knowledgeable guy out there.


Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question


That guy is a knucklehead. The "Best Cert" is the one you need or help you
do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I
really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$,
Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were
converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do it so I asked the
company to give me a shot. I used the knowledge again when we switched to
NVPN. My only point is that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my
skill set.

I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I hired the guy that
had very little Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that
at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had
more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their
chosen craft.

-----Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question


Don't invite that speaker again.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cerification question


There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was
being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of
certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier
certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before
graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Certification question

[Soysal, Serdar]

That's because there are more moron IT recruiters out there than there are
qualified professionals.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Certification question


As an unemployed IT person, I'd say get whatever certs you can, because like
it or not, there's more jobs available for paper mcse's than there are for
experienced non-mcse's.

My disclaimer - At least that's been my experience, and of course your
mileage may vary.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Schwartz
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Certification question


As a recruiter, I would agree. There's no substitute for experience.

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question


Could we rephrase this?  How about:
Which "went to a braindump or bootcamp & got his paper certification with no
real-world experience" would you be quickest to lock out of your server room
for fear that he might touch something?


-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:58 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Cerification question
Subject: Cerification question


There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was
being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of
certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier
certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before
graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cerification question

[Soysal, Serdar]

Don't invite that speaker again.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cerification question


There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was
being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of
certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier
certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before
graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Test to see if the list is live...

[Soysal, Serdar]

Yeah, but all iMacs and Sun Workstations run Windows XP here.  Oh look,
somebody's installing Windows ME on that mainframe.  Let's go look.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test to see if the list is live...


Wer have all died and gone to MS Heaven!!!  All praise Bill Gates... 
Ophs!!! It sure is hot - perhaps it not Heaven after all...

-Original Message-----
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test to see if the list is live...


We all went to the bar and "forgot" to invite you.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Test to see if the list is live...


Haven't seen any activities today.

Andrew,

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Which is better trend with ESE API or AVAPI/MAPI ???? ForExc hang e 5.5

[Soysal, Serdar]

We've been pretty happy with ESE API as well.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Which is better trend with ESE API or AVAPI/MAPI  For Exc
hang e 5.5


ESE is latest and greatest.
There have been reports that AVAPI can get overloaded like MAPI, but I have
not heard of one real life experience.

-Original Message-
From: Robert Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Which is better trend with ESE API or AVAPI/MAPI  For Exchang e
5.5


I have just purchased this and I was wondering which is a better choice?

Thank You,
Robert Williams
Senior Network Administrator
Raypak, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone - 805-278-5363


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Test to see if the list is live...

[Soysal, Serdar]

We all went to the bar and "forgot" to invite you.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Test to see if the list is live...


Haven't seen any activities today.

Andrew,

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sort of OT but!!!!

[Soysal, Serdar]

Read what you wrote carefully.  You are talking about impacting all of YOUR
users to eliminate the effects of another company being infected with a
virus.  What will happen when the next KLEZ-like virus comes out and starts
spoofing the new email ids?  

The only thing you can do is to inform your users about the effects of this
KLEZ virus so they won't be surprised when they receive an email like "Why
you send me virus?".  In addition to that, you can contact your company's
business partners who have your users in their address books and suggest
that they stop hiring unskilled monkeys to run their IT department.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Roger Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sort of OT but


Hi all
I have a client who is experiencing the following problem.   
He is receiving the virus messages for mail that he has not sent.   What is
happening is that someone has used his email address to proliferate the KLEZ
virus and all the sites that have received it have emailed him saying that
the mail that he has sent has the virus.I went through all the logs for
both the exchange and the external mail interface and non of the mail was
sent by him (come to that, from the site).   Apart from changing his email
address, dropping the old address and causing absolute bedlam is there any
way of stopping this?
Thanks

Roger Smith  MCSE, MCP+I, CCNA
Technical Support Manager
OfficePCs
10 Cape Street
Dickson
Phone : 62579111
Fax:  62579004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Site Connectors in Ex.5.5

[Soysal, Serdar]

Whoa!  Big word!  Brain overload!  I gotta go home and sleep this off.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Site Connectors in Ex.5.5


Unequivocally, no

-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 6:41 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Site Connectors in Ex.5.5
Subject: Site Connectors in Ex.5.5


In order for site connectors to work properly, do you need to have both
servers as BDC's in NT or DC in W2K?

Ron

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: NT Account Lockout using OWA for Exchange 5.5

[Soysal, Serdar]

When you login to OWA, you essentially log on to the domain you supplied and
the logon occurs on the OWA server.  The same domain policies apply, you do
lock your password after unsuccessful attempts.  In your environment maybe
the logon does not occur at all.  Something may be failing before a logon to
the domain  actually takes place.  Can the user account you tested with
actually logon properly with the correct password?

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NT Account Lockout using OWA for Exchange 5.5


Good afternoon all:

My boss as posed a good question to me and I have not been able to
find the answer.

The situation is this:

We have OWA up for our users under Exchange 5.5. Using IE,
the OWA browser interface will kick you out after three failed attempts to
provide a proper userid/password combination. When kicked out multiple times
using the same userid, the id is not locked in the domain. A security policy
states that failed login attempts in excess of x attempts in y minutes will
lock the account, but through OWA this does not seem to be happening.

The question is this, given enough time, will a cracker be
able to bruteforce the login through OWA without locking out the NT account
in the domain.

Thanks for any help in this.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981

>SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue >0
0 rows returned


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Haiku Friday

[Soysal, Serdar]

Dale, listen to me
Exchange can handle itself
No reboot for you!

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Haiku Friday


Reboot Exchange box
Annually whether it
Wants me to or not

Dale L. Orr
Network Administrator
DoD Polygraph Institute

-Original Message-
But he said it has been up for a year and 4 months.  You're saying it's been
up for 35 days?


Don Ely

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server

[Soysal, Serdar]

In this organization every network problem is first reported as an "Exchange
Issue".  It's probably due to the fact that Outlook is the only network
application that EVERY client uses and it is usually the very first network
application that they open.  That's probably the reason why the network
problems are reported as exchange issues.  Well, that and an untrainable
mass of helpdeskians.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 5:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server


I am amazed daily at the number of people who blame Exchange when they are
having DNS issues

-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Thursday, April 25, 2002 3:52 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server


"Awaiting Directory Lookup" this would indicate that you have dsaccess
problems, which would also start to explain the OWA logon issues. 

So, IMHO, I think you should look at the communication between your exchange
servers and your DC\GC servers.


Yours, 

Julian Stone 


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 25 April 2002 19:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server


As far as I can see, nothing is wrong. The server ran fine for months
without any restarts or reboots before SP2.

We went with SP2 because of better OWA features and better SMTP queue
management. Before SP2 we used to get messages stuck in the "Awaiting
Directory Lookup" queue and there was no way to get rid of them. Those pesky
messages eventually ate all the memory. We had to stop the SMTP virtual
server and create a new SMTP virtual server. After SP2, we can simply remove
those messages from this queue.



But a few days after installing SP2, we ran into the OWA problem: When OWA
gives up, there are no warnings or errors in the event log, CPU or memory
utilization do not change. Everything looks the same, but OWA does not like
people's passwords anymore. Although this could have something to do with
Kerberos tickets expiring (or not expiring) on time...

-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server


What else is wrong with your systems to warrant this ?? 

I have systems that have been running for months on SP2 with no issues.


Yours, 

Julian Stone 


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 25 April 2002 19:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server


Hey since Exchange SP2 I have had to stop and start all my Exchange and IIS
services EVERY NIGHT. If I don't, the following day OWA stops accepting
users' passwords in the middle of a production day.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]