not sure if this helps but veritas used to make a product called
telebackup...a delta backup type product specifically for laptops. It was
around version 7.2 though.
Best of luck
Dom.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 March 2003 14:05
To:
I think they renamed that product Net backup Professional.
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 9:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Exec
not sure if this helps but veritas used to make a product called
Try adding this to your start of your backup batch file:
Net use \\BPA\ipc$ /user:administrator PasswordForAdministrator
Oh, and you may want to use blat.exe to email results to you.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 1:01 PM
To:
Set up job completion notification via email.
Verify your backups periodically on your disaster recovery test server.
- Original Message -
From: Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:56 AM
Subject: backup exec best
Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: backup exec best practices
Set up job completion notification via email.
Verify your backups periodically on your disaster recovery test server.
- Original Message
Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: backup exec best practices
Set up job completion notification via email.
Verify your backups periodically on your disaster recovery test server.
- Original Message
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: backup exec best practices
Set up job completion notification via email.
Verify your backups periodically on your disaster
, March 06, 2003 11:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: backup exec best practices
8.6?
Nope, you can specify any SMTP server. No need to install Outlook on the BE
server.
Single Mailbox backups are not a fan favorite.
- Original Message -
From: Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED
Ok, 9.0 will be the same as far as that goes.
Check the archives re: that last statement :)
- Original Message -
From: Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:19 AM
Subject: RE: backup exec best practices
I have backup
Subject: RE: backup exec best practices
I have backup exec 9.0 for windows server and I have it
installed on the
exchange server itself
I did not get you on the Single Mailbox backups are not a
fan favorite.
Santhosh.H
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From
UNINSTALL? :p
-Original Message-
From: Santhosh, H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: backup exec best practices
any suggestions while scheduling the regular backup exec.
I have done few of the below
overwrite protection
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Domain Controller causing problems???
I am sorry about that.
We are 100% 'Windows 2000 Server' - so yes - Active
I'm not clear on what your network is - W2K Active Directory, native or
mixed? In AD there is no such thing as a BDC, they're all DCs. Is that
what you built? Or is yours a BDC left over from an NT4 domain?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Perhaps the two domain controllers are not in the same domain, even if
they look like they are, as with the Two PDC problem.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 6:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Domain Controller causing problems???
I'm not clear on what your network is - W2K Active Directory, native or
mixed? In AD there is no such thing as a BDC
there (in various places)? Normally, just an added DC
shouldn't require a lot of care feeding.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Domain Controller causing problems???
I am
Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Domain Controller causing problems???
When you go into ADUC and click on 'Domain Controllers' do you see both
of your DCs there? Take a good look at your event logs - if you are
having authentication errors, those should be showing up. How about
when you check
Discussions
Objet : RE: Backup Domain Controller causing problems???
Yes, I consider all those items a given - and verified that very early on.
When inside of Active Directory Users and Computers, the Primary and
Additional Domain controllers I created don't show up in the list of
computers - of course
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 8:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE : Backup Domain Controller causing problems???
Time synchronisation? Only one DC in the root domain should have an external Time
source.
Whar is the status of the replication if you run
to the root DC.
-Message d'origine-
De : Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 25 février, 2003 21:34
À : Exchange Discussions
Objet : RE: RE : Backup Domain Controller causing problems???
Replication monitor says All is well - so we can rule that out.
Time Sync
]
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 February 2003 17:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Question? [bcc]
If you read this list regularly, you would know that you might as well
skip the exchsrvr\*data directories. You didn't say that you
: RE: Backup Question?
I didn't make it at all clear - the backup I'll be taking is
an online Exchange backup which will go to file which then
get dumped to tape.
What I wasn't sure about was the merits of also having a job
to backup the server that backs up the whole thing
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Question? [bcc]
I think I'm either misunderstanding you, or you're misunderstanding
NTBackup2000 or whatever we're calling it.
If you want to back up SystemState and drive C: and E: but exclude
C:\winnt\system32 and e:\foo\bar you can just edit
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 5:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
I have personally seen him after a few too many beers. He
does look better.
-Original Message-
From: William
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
Beers on me!
-- Original Message --
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:47:07 -0800
I've
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Finnesey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:31 AM
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
How is CommValt now a days
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
How is CommValt now a days ?
Ryan,
-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto
Subject: Re: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
Reasonable. But usually a SAN means you also start looking at
an enterprise backup solution.
** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts
dealing with Exchange 2003 **
--
Martin Tuip
MVP
AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
So no-one is using EMCs hot-split snapshot backup solution for Exchange
2000?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 30 January 2003 09:48
Posted
2003 13:16
Posted To: Exchange 55 list server
Conversation: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
While I do trust the EMC engineers, particularly after
talking with several of them at MEC, do I really want to go
Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
While I do trust the EMC engineers, particularly after talking with
several of them at MEC, do I really want to go with a backup solution
that Microsoft does not fully support?
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford
Of Mark Harford
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 5:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
There is always that concern, but many of us went along with Sybari
Antigen which was not ostensibly supported by MS. Also I believe EMC
developed
According to the EMC engineers, they can do a hot split. No need to
stop and restart the services.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000
That's not what they told us, but this was at least 6 months ago. Things
may have changed since then.
-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000
That was the word I got at MEC.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
That's not what they told us, but this was at least 6 months
: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
Well the Microsoft Engineers seem to think it will work quite well. I will
let you know how it works out
, 2003 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
That was the word I got at MEC.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup
Yea, they told me I was handsome.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:49 PM
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
They'll tell you anything to sell you a box.
Ed
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
They'll tell you anything to sell you a box.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Depp, Dennis M.
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
Well the Microsoft Engineers seem to think it will work quite well. I
will
let you know how it works out.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:23 AM
To: Exchange
fax (850)412-0400
-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
That was the word I got at MEC.
-Original Message-
From: Ken
They probably hadn't seen you in person or picture What's up?
Jake
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Backup solution for Exchange 2000
lol
I look much better after a few beers, or with lime juice in my eyes.
- Original Message -
From: Jacob Jeong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:19 PM
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
You are sick.
Jake
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
lol
I look much better after a few beers
.
Jake
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
lol
I look much better after a few beers, or with lime
- MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
I have personally seen him after a few too many beers. He does look better.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
He's so
:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
lol
I look much better after a few beers, or with lime juice in my eyes.
- Original Message -
From: Jacob Jeong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January
, January 30, 2003 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
I have personally seen him after a few too many beers. He does look
better.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2
Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000
BackupExec works really well, but let me suggest an alternative.
Run NTBackup and backup Exchange to a disk file, then back that file up with
a normal file backup from NetBackup.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis -
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
BackupExec works really well, but let me suggest an alternative.
Run NTBackup and backup Exchange to a disk file, then back that file up
with
a normal
We are planning to use Legato in this situation to backup our Exchange
database.
Dennis Depp
-Original Message-
From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an
NT Backup is BE Lite.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
Does NTBackup backup exchange faster
Message-
From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
Does NTBackup backup exchange faster than BE would
I am just curious because I am looking for a way
: 29 January 2003 14:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
NT Backup is BE Lite.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:25 AM
To: Exchange
- Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
Surely the choice of backup device
You can always try Veritas other backup product Netbackup?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 January 2003 14:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
BackupExec works really well, but let me suggest an alternative.
Run NTBackup and backup Exchange to a disk file, then back that file up with
a normal file
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
I thought you couldn't cluster Exchange.
BTW, we're running the same setup (albeit probably much smaller) and
backing up using BE 8.6. We haven't run across any problems so far.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Well the Microsoft Engineers seem to think it will work quite well. I will
let you know how it works out.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000
you'll get to know your PSS people and TAM very well.
-Original Message-
From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
Well the Microsoft
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
you'll get to know your PSS people and TAM very well.
-Original Message-
From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday
How is CommValt now a days ?
Ryan,
-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
We are planning to use Legato in this situation
Tricky question.
I run DLT7000s, which are 35/70GB drives. In general, I get enough
compression to hit about 60-62GB on the tape, which works out to be around
1.7:1 compression. YMMV
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup onto LTO and compression question.
It depends on other factors as well, the number and sizes of your
tracking logs, the number of transaction logs on the server, are you
indexing your message stores
I'm currently backing up 164 Gbytes of data, that's a public
Does it matter?
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:41 PM
Subject: Backup onto LTO and compression question.
This might be somewhat of a vague question. We current have
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Backup onto LTO and compression question.
Does it matter?
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED
It depends on other factors as well, the number and sizes of your
tracking logs, the number of transaction logs on the server, are you
indexing your message stores
I'm currently backing up 164 Gbytes of data, that's a public folder
store, three message stores in one storage group, tracking logs,
I think it means you should upgrade to 8.6 + the latest build.
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Newell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:27 AM
Subject: OT: Backup Exec Help
This is off topic but I figured there are a few
:) Ya we had plans of upgrading that system to Win2k and upgrading to 8.6.
Looks like me might have to start sooner then latter.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: December 6, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Backup Exec Help
I think
, December 06, 2002 7:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Exec Help
:) Ya we had plans of upgrading that system to Win2k and upgrading to 8.6.
Looks like me might have to start sooner then latter.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: December 6
Problem with the specific share permissions?
Maybe they are set slightly more restrictive on those some systems?
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 December 2002 15:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Backup Exec Help
This is off topic but
and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Bubba G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 10:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup hardware
Yes, that was BUY.COM's Price Mismatch of the Day yesterday... $100
off yesterday if I remember.
If DR
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup hardware
Good idea. I expect to do these in the middle of the night,
but that's
still important if you're doing 30 or 40 gb. I'll go out
see
www.benchmarktape.com Valusmart
www.veritas.com Backupexec for 2000 8.6
-Original Message-
From: Bubba G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup hardware
For those on the Yahoogroups list, my apologies for the
I use a VXA tape drive and backup exec. Find them at vxa.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bubba G
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 7:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup hardware
For those on the Yahoogroups list, my
What are you using for hardware? I have 2 dedicated servers
For my own personal network, I have a scheduled task that backups (using
NTBACKUP) up my Exchange/DC/file server to a file on spare drive on
another machine. I have a spare drive just for this purpose (they are
sooo cheap now.)
I
, 2002 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup hardware
I use a VXA tape drive and backup exec. Find them at vxa.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bubba G
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 7:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bubba G
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup hardware
I saw the Exabyte VXA-2 drives and they appear to be quick (8MPS), large
(80/160), decent media price ($80-$85
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, at 10:45am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the best/most reliable 60/120 hardware (and software you are using
for it if it is not NTBackup) for those on a budget out there now?
Aside from Veritas Backup Exec, you can look at NovaNet from NovaStor.
We use both, and find
don't have to buy at least two tape drives plus media.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup hardware
We've been using the VXA-1 drives for about 2 years now. Never had
:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup hardware
I'm thinking of going to the USB2 external drive system for offsite storage,
I can put together an 80mb system for under $200, and have 5 rotatable drives
for about a grand. Except that the drives are a bit more heavy and sensitive
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, at 10:17am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking of going to the USB2 external drive system for offsite
storage ...
Check the speed of the unit (throughput in actual use, not the speed of
the HDD, or the IDE interface, or the USB2 interface) before you make a
purchase.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup hardware
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, at 10:17am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking of going to the USB2 external drive system for offsite
storage ...
Check the speed of the unit (throughput in actual use, not the speed
of the HDD, or the IDE interface
Not unlike some employees.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, at 10:17am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking of going to the
Let's see. Not backing so you activated circular logging. Wrong. There are
many good solutions out there. In the mean time start using NTbackup at
least, till you decide.
- Original Message -
From: Bubba G [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
it for now and decided to
continue to look at the tape drives.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup hardware
Good idea. I expect to do these in the middle of the night
, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Backup hardware
Let's see. Not backing so you activated circular logging. Wrong. There
are many good solutions out there. In the mean time start using NTbackup
at least, till you decide.
- Original Message -
From: Bubba G [EMAIL
Hmmm, $264 today, I'll have to watch closer...what part of the DR
routine do you think would be made more complex?
-Original Message-
From: Bubba G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 3:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup hardware
Yeah, BUY.COM
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 7:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup hardware
Hmmm, $264 today, I'll have to watch closer...what part of the DR
routine do you think would be made more complex?
-Original Message-
From: Bubba G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
this
without saying look you idiot this is not going to work.
Just my .02
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 5:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Hardware
See I already knew the backup strategy was crap
]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 6:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Hardware
just jumping in late here but why not play this the other way, ask him
for permission to run a DR drill using the take home drive. Invite him
to play, then when it fails you can
Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Hardware
I quite agree, you seem to be missing the point that the backup strategy is
crap, and it's not due to hard disk transportation issues. I think you have
the ammo you were after, now use it!
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL
Why is he taking it home? Is he concerned about fire/theft or corruption?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matt Natkin
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Hardware
If you really do
: Backup Hardware
Subject: RE: Backup Hardware
Why is he taking it home? Is he concerned about fire/theft or
corruption?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http
There's no maybe about it - it just is what it is. It won't work.
Great books your company makes btw! ;)
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kleinsinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Hardware
I
the ammo you need is to show them that you can't
recover the system from one disk.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 13 September 2002 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Hardware
Tell him there won't be any redundency when he takes
]]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Hardware
In RAID-5 one drive is not a mirror of anything.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups
101 - 200 of 346 matches
Mail list logo
