Thanks for your response. We have our limits in two places, globally (Exchange -
Global Settings - Message Delivery) and on the SMTP protocol for each server (Server -
Protocols - SMTP - Default SMTP - Virtual Server - Default SMTP Virtual Server)
Where did you set the limits? On the org? on
Where did you set the limits? On the org? on the user? On the SMTP
Virtual Server?
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 6:04 AM
To: Exchange
Sounds about right.. 'on behalf of' is really an Exchange-ism which
doesn't have a direct parallel per se in the relevant RFCs AFAIK.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 2:28 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Send on Behalf
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on Behalf delegation not working outside of org
Sounds about right.. 'on behalf of' is really an Exchange-ism which
doesn't have a direct parallel per se in the relevant RFCs AFAIK
Create a custom recipient
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Send a CC to an internet address as well
Hi there...
Exchange 5.5 Latest SP.
I was looking for the setting in the
Alternate recipient.
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussions
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, April 04, 2003 10:31 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Send a CC to an internet address as well
Subject: Send a CC to an internet address as well
Hi
You need to give them Send As permissions from Exch Admin
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP 4.0
I am setting up a mailbox that people will need
Send as permissions are not the same as send on behalf of.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on behalf of
You need to give them Send As permissions
to Send As that entity.)
Nikki
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on behalf of
You need to give them Send As permissions from Exch Admin
-Original Message-
From
Martin,
How do you do that?
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on behalf of
You need to give them Send As permissions from Exch Admin
-Original
Dennis... Please explain your statement. Thanks...
-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on behalf of
Send as permissions are not the same as send on behalf of.
Dennis
in the Delegates
window they will be able to Send As that entity.)
Nikki
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on behalf of
You need to give them Send
it will say something like
From: Dennis Depp (on behalf of Terry Depp)
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on behalf of
Dennis... Please explain your statement
, but... It doesn't work..
-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on behalf of
When I use Send As, the message looks like it came from the sender.
When I open the message, it still
-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on behalf of
Here is what I did... What did I do wrong?
I have a Help Desk mailbox. I created a distribution list called AIS HELP
DESK.
I added AIS HELP DESK
What happens when they try to? Do they get an error message or
Aloha,
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Paul Done [mailto:pdone;csusb.edu]
Sent:
What has happened to the people who look things up in the KB or archives.
Come on folks. What do you think they are there for?
http://search.support.microsoft.com/search/default.aspx?Catalog=LCID%3D1033%
26CDID%3DEN-US-KB%26PRODLISTSRC%3DONProduct=KeywordType=ALLTitles=falsen
It's the Administators mailbox on the Internet Mail tab on the IMC.
-Original Message-
From: Andre Minnaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Send mail with unkown recipient to admin mailbox
Is there a way to direct all
Do you think it might be pertinent here to mention what Exchange version
you're using? Since it's done differently in 5.5 and 2000. I'm going
to assume Exchange 2000 because that's who answers at
mail.anddesco.com.au. It's in the properties of your SMTP virtual
server. Properties / Messages
You could write an event script to do this.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: NetStar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Send the message day before the meeting.
Is there a way to setup an auto reply that is to
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send the message day before the meeting.
You could write an event script to do this.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: NetStar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April
Subject: RE: Send the message day before the meeting.
What's an event script? Is that like an FAQ?
Don Ely
Network Engineer
Tripath Imaging, Inc.
(336) 290-8293 - Direct
(336) 516-4519 - Mobile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
http://www.tripathimaging.com
, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send the message day before the
meeting.
What's an event script? Is that like an FAQ?
Don Ely
Network Engineer
Tripath Imaging
Makes you look sophisticated?
-Original Message-
From: NetStar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send the message day before the meeting.
Does anybody know of a script that does this?
--- Soysal, Serdar
]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send the message day before the meeting.
Makes you look sophisticated?
-Original Message-
From: NetStar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send the message day before the meeting.
Does anybody know of a script that does this?
--- Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's my standard answer to questions I don't
understand. I use the word
script so people will have a false illusion
Give the default user Contributor rights. The only rights this has is to
create an item in the folder. This works for me.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send mail from Public
Well, first off, sending as a public folder has nothing to do with your PAB.
Remove the entry from your PAB and then ask yourself Why on earth am I
still using this beast if I'm on Outlook 2000?.
That settled, try unhiding the PF from the GAL. You should be able to send
as that PF then.
Serdar
and it still did not work.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot
Well, first off, sending as a public folder has
Contacts folder instead, which works just fine. So you still don't need the
PAB.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot
I do not use
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot
Excerpt from slipstick:
If you want a user to send with a folder's address, the folder must not be
hidden.
...
Once the user has Send As permission, they can use View | From Field
You could export the GAL out to Excel and set your search criteria there.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From:
, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 February 2002 20:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: send mail from external sources into public folders
Yep, I think you're right. But if you have your IMS on another server, you
still might have to wait for the address to update in the directory
We are using 2k
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tristan Gayford
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: send mail from external sources into public folders
Depends on the version of Exchange
Try
Default: contributor
Anonymous: none
Worked for me.
-Yanek.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: send mail from external sources into public folders
How long did
Subject: RE: send mail from external sources into public folders
Try
Default: contributor
Anonymous: none
Worked for me.
-Yanek.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: send
If you haven't made an changes to the registry on your Exchange server, the
default time is two hours for changes to propagate. FAQ 3.46 applies.
Mike Morrison
NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
What version of Exchange? It does make a little bit of difference, you
know.
It's amazing what you can find on the Microsoft Web Site. Even papers
by list participant, noted author and all-around nice guy Paul
Robichaux.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur
Post the NDR.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David J.
Culliton
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:19 AM
To:
Is the account he's sending as a public folder by chance?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:19 AM
To: Exchange
It will send as that person (not on behalf) as the NT permission will
override (been there, got the tee shirt).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Bevilacqua.Steve [mailto:[EMAIL
How about testing it and letting us know the results of your testing?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Bevilacqua.Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 6:24 AM
Looks like send as rules...kinda goes against the standard of most
restrictive from a ntfs/share perspective...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on Behalf vs Send
NDR? Error messages? Please post them.
-Original Message-
From: Ty Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Send/Reply
We are a small dept within the University - approx 100
users, NT4 Server and Exchange 5.5 with
Are these 'problem' users in his personal address book - possibly with an
old invalid address ?
-Original Message-
From: Ty Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 October 2001 13:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Send/Reply
We are a small dept within the University - approx 100
MSEXCH:IMS:strathuni:mansci:SIGMA 3550 (000B09AA) 550 rejected:
administrative prohibition
-Original Message-
From: Taylor, Mal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 October 2001 13:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send/Reply
Are these 'problem' users in his personal address
of
the Uni and find out what they have done!
Tris
-
Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems and Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe
-Original Message-
From: Ty Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 October 2001 13:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send/Reply
Subject: RE: Send/Reply
This is an example of the message received, it's always the
same format and the last line MSEXCH: IMS always
contains the same information. I've tried looking in Technet
for any of the numbers listed but can't seem to find
anything on this particular problem
At 12:14 PM 9/11/2001 +0100, Norman wrote:
So, masters and apprentices, which is it?
Neither.
Use of the BCC field simply tells the *sending* client to not put those
recipient addresses in the RFC822 headers.
The addresses only go in the transient SMTP envelope(s) which won't be seen by
the
If you're still using Outlook 97 it could happen - see Q167111 and Q257599
in the KB
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September 2001 23:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time...
BCC results in a separate message
Personally, I wouldn't do a thing, other than tell the students to either
get a real email address or to take up the offer of the mailbox enabled
account.
Les Bessant MCP[1] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert
Acting in a personal capacity
http://www.tiggercam.co.uk -
You didn't say what client. If it's Outlook 2000 or 2002, you could
forward it as an iCal message. That way you don't need to worry about RTF.
Exchange 5.5 SP4
I sent a meeting request to a user who works in a different company but using
Exchange as well. The user received the meeting
BCC results in a separate message sent to each non-Exchange
recipient.
Actually, this appears to not be true.
That was my understanding too. I was under the impression
that it is up to the receiving server to massage the headers
so that it looked like the BCC recipient was the
:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time...
BCC results in a separate message sent to each non-Exchange recipient.
Actually, this appears to not be true.
That was my understanding too. I was under the impression that it is up to
the receiving server
From my perspective, you're making this real hard.
Inform the students that they can use any mailbox they want, but as far as
the university is concerned official communications from staff and faculty
are delivered to their Exchange mailbox. It is the student's responsibility
to keep up with
Can anyone in your org address the All Students DL? If it's just for administrative
staff you could try training them to address this list in the BCC: field so the
address info would not be sent along with the message.
I agree with another post on this topic - I think you've gone too far to
. Osborn
Information Systems Technical Specialist
Wisconsin Department of Transportation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Send to no more than 25 at a time
Subject: RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time...
No, only faculty and staff can send to All Students, but I'm not sure I understand how
using BCC would help here. If I have 80 students with Hotmail accounts, and I BCC a
message to my All Students group, isn't Exchange still going to just try
your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time...
Sorry - I think I spoke too soon (it's a very
Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time
At 03:15 PM 9/10/2001 -0700, Ed Crowley wrote:
BCC results in a separate message sent to each non-Exchange recipient.
Actually, this appears to not be true.
Watching the mail come from our 5.5 IMS to our sendmail relay, only one
message comes out, with two different envelope recipients, same
Best solution: user should learn how to create an appointment from scratch.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Phillip Yan
Sent:
* could be wrong?/Sacrilege*
Greg
* Please interpret this as honest-to-goodness praise and not in any way a negative
thing!
-Original Message-
From: Joel Noble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 5:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send to no more than 25
I'm assuming the CR represents an internet user, the mail going out the IMS.
If so, this is by design and expected.
- Original Message -
From: Phillip Yan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 6:28 PM
Subject: Send mail to
64 matches
Mail list logo
