Heard before:
How you would solve a proxy failure problem by trying to search for
help on the online Technet edition?
Martin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 6:50 AM
To: Exchange
SMTP transaction logs can be found in the exchsrvr\imcdata\log directory.
also check exchsrvr\imcdata\in and exchsrvr\imcdata\out.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Lloyd, D (Dave) (IT Systems)
Hi!
I've been asked one thing that some of you may have already been asked to
do before: access a user's mailbox and get a backup of everything in
there.
I'll not discuss the legal/ethical questions about this. I *really* need
to get that information to my boss.
I've searched Microsoft KB and
Once you do manage to open the mailbox, how are you proposing to back it up?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 November 2001 10:21
To: Exchange
Brothers and sisters,
Sorry voor mine late reaction, the problem is solved when we replaced
ntuser.dat from network profile with a default ntuser.dat.
gr
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 6:20 AM
Aan:
Thanks to all!
I'm now waiting to see if the permissions work.
I'll back it up creating a .pst with all the information (no big problem
on that). Do you suggest anything else?
Once you do manage to open the mailbox, how are you proposing to back it up?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Hi All,
Last week I received an error, it was event id 7200 and event id 7201.
exchange was locked and no one could get into their Mailboxes. I rebooted
the box and everything was ok. I felt that IS was corrupted so I ran
(ISINTEG -fix pri -test alltests) until I got 0 errors. This morning I
Thats what i was thinking. Sounds good to me.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 November 2001 11:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Log in to
Hi folks,
We've got an Exchange organisation here with 2 sites, each with a server running
Exchange 5.5 SP4. There are 2 domains, the boundaries of
which are the same as the sites, connected by a 2-way trust. Connectivity between the
sites/domains is very good (lan speeds), we are set
up
also:
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=7201source=
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 November 2001 11:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Ahh, the joys of Inbound Only and Outbound Only IMCs...
A few issues here. First, as you've found, the Inbound Only setting doesn't
do a whole lot of anything. Its a strange bug that never seemed to get
fixed, but the work arounds are simple.
Second, since you're dealing with site routing
Quick search returns Q183400, which shows which tests to run to try to fix
the errors (you don't have to run alltests to do it).
There is something else going on, though. My gut would be that you have a
filesystem antivirus package hitting \exchsrvr\mdbdata, which could cause
this.
Make sure
Hi Louis,
Thanks for the Q ariticals. However these do not reference my error code.
The overloaded server may be an something for me to look into. But the
other references Exchange 2000. I have searched thru the knowledge base
and found nothing on event id 7200 and the errors
background
Removing the address space completely (no address space) is far more
efficient way of dealing with your problem. The removal of the address space
will result in your IMS being removed form the routing table (an advantage
in a complex environment) while still allowing the IMS to receive mail.
Thanks Roger,
I did have the mdbdata excluded but may not have has IMCdata in the
exclusion list. I added all of exchsrvr to my exclusion list.
I do also believe that it has to do virus software. I have NAI and there
is a problem with the virus api that I tried to correct by upping the
value
Have search permissions been set by the administrator in the Exchange Server
Administrator program? Do they get an error message when they try to access
the GAL? The search control in Exchange Server 5.5 is used to limit GAL
access, and after being set by an administrator, the recipients in the
Here's a somewhat off-topic question. How do you store your tapes? We
have a small network, and a lot of backup tapes. I know many of you have
larger networks than we do, so must have a sh*tpile of tapes. How do you
store them? Right now ours are just laying on a table (except for the
off-site
Fire-proof site every time for us. In a separate building on site for the
'keep to hand ones' and completely off-site for the rest (archives and all
that). Shelves aren't that good in a fire!!
Tris
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 November 2001
Why not Exmerge?
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 6:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Log in to user's mailboxes
Thats what i was thinking. Sounds good to me.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Fire safe for one week.
Shipped off-site every Friday.
Every Friday they bring me back 8-week old tapes for me to use the following
Monday.
They can have my tapes back here in one hour in an emergency (and I just had
one). :(
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL
Experienced this the last week or so here. Turned off mixed mode and all is
well. I've also seen this error running Trend's Scanmail in AVAPI mode.
-Original Message-
From: Bernadette Gerber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 5:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I might not be the most qualified but I am still learning. All I have to
say is you have to start somewhere. Its my first job in this field and been
doing it for just under a year now. I have no one else who handles the
servers for me so I am the only one here. This is why I like to read this
An e2k bakup server for an exchange 5.5 server probably wont be much good
due to the different versions.
But please explain what you are aiming to achieve with this config.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
Good points, I could turn it off but I am curious is the nav causing a
corruption or is the nav just causing the error and there is no real
corruption?
-Original Message-
From: Quiram, Nadia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 6:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I'd give PSS a call.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Am I in need of a serious db defrag?
Good points, I could turn it off but I am curious is the nav causing a
corruption
Hi all,
Can anyone provide any help on how to get the above to work with a proxy
server or point me in a direction where I could get some help??!! For some
reason I can't get the Network Password box to appear unless I disable the
proxy! I may need to submit this to another list...if so can
Hi Stephanie,
The above didn't appeardid u post it as an attachment? I don't think
this list allows its members to post those.
Regards
E.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Proxy Server Windows NT Challenge/Response
Hi all,
Can anyone provide any help on how
By 'above' I think she meant the Subject
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 November 2001 23:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Proxy Server Windows NT Challenge/Response
Hi Stephanie,
The above didn't appeardid u post it as
Try http://www.iisfaq.com/
for proxy related info
Michael O'Toole
- Original Message -
From: Halliday S (ISELS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:20 AM
Subject: Proxy Server Windows NT Challenge/Response
Hi all,
Can
I've started getting some strange Outbound messages to Postmaster. Please
take a look. It appears that these messages are originating from the inside
but I am not sure how to track down their source. Any suggestions?
---
A mail message was not sent because the maximum time
Thank God this is done
New Switch is finally installed
Exchange still running
Denis
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
FAQ
-Original Message-
From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)
I've started getting some strange Outbound messages to Postmaster. Please
take a look. It appears
I have one exchange server 5.5 for two different companies on the same
network. We have two buildings connected by a bridge we want to purchase a
backup exchange server so if one building would burn down we could still use
the server in the other building for our email.
-Original
So that would read as: Can anyone provide any help on how to get Proxy
Server Windows NT Challenge/Response to work with a proxy server or
point.. snip???
H, sorry if I misread it Stephanie, but perhaps you are the person to
clear this up?
Regards
E.
-Original Message-
From:
Doh.. Sorry.
3.39 Q: Messages are being sent from my site with an empty originator,
A: That is a system generated message, either an NDR or a delivery receipt.
See RFC-821, section 3.6 for the reasoning behind this.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Thank God it's Friday
Tacos for dinner tonight
Have a nice weekend
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Denis Baldwin
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Haiku Friday
Thank God this is done
New Switch is
hehe.
And actually it should be 2821 ,( Section 6.1 I believe)
-Original Message-
From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)
Doh.. Sorry.
3.39 Q: Messages are
Where do you set permissions for users mailboxes in Exchange 5.5
I think 2K has messed me up, there is NO permissions tab.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Tools/Options/Permissions
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Quick 5.5 question
Where do you set permissions for users mailboxes in Exchange 5.5
I think 2K has messed me up,
TechNet article Q259282 says that there are different versions of this -
one for Ex5.5 the other Win2K. It says The Exchange version is found
on the Exchange 5.5 Resource Kit. It doesn't. I've exhausted all my
sources still no joy. If anyone has even seen the Exchange version of
this I'd be
You're being spammed by the looks of things, unless you are intentionally
sending out emails with the subject lines you are describing below. You need
to turn relaying off or configure it correctly.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
Just chugged down about 16oz after it had cooled a good bit.
Hello World!
Barry
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
HP said parts on backorder.
Feeling blue
Can't do backups :o(
Time for some MGD's in double digits
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
RFC821
then it must construct an undeliverable mail notification message and
send it to the originator of the undeliverable mail (as indicated by the
reverse-path).
This would seem to indicate relaying? However, I have my system setup to
NOT relay. I've even tested (per the faq)? According to
I dont think that is going to prevent spam arriving at his door, otherwise
we could all end it tomorrow.
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages
We use a place called The Lock-up here in Chicago. They have a fireproof
storage facility out in the suburbs (more than 30 miles away), and they come
and pick up our tapes every morning. Every tape has gets a little barcode on
it, so they're easy to retrieve, and they'll use any tape rotation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maybe this link may help... http://www.slipstick.com/exs/relay.htm
I seems like u need to stop anonymous relay.! Do u route incoming
smtp mail..? If so impliment proper routing
restictions.. To check the anonymous realy, from an outside source
What you are seeing are NDRS that can't be returned.
I wouldnt worry about those.
-Original Message-
From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)
RFC821
then it must
Sorry Mr. Joyce, I don't agree. Commercial email (unsolicited or not) is
coming into his domain, but he is not relaying. Instead, the spammers are
sending to invalid addresses within his domain and using invalid (or
unresolvable) return addresses.
So: 1) Spam comes in.
2) Exchange tries to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
careful u don't end up here relays.mail-abuse.org hehe
- -Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)
You may want to read the relevant RFC on what means...
-Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good point Mr. East. I beleive you are correct there.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 November 2001 16:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange
The source was generated by your server in response to a message that it
received from somwhere, with the Reply-To address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED], to which your server cannot complete delivery
of the NDR.
Elementary, my dear Watson.
--
Roger D.
I don't email much
But thought I'd give it a try
Wife's birthday tonight!
-Original Message-
From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
Thank God it's Friday
Tacos for dinner tonight
Have
Dr. Watson? ;)
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)
The source was generated by your server in response to a message that it
received
I just added them to my message filter.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)
The source was generated by your server in response to a
That will help today. Tomorrow, 12 new ones will spring up in their place.
It's a losing battle, dude. Look away; nothing to see here.
-Original Message-
From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
er Tony, you may want to read up on the format of haiku ...
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
HP said parts on backorder.
Feeling blue
Can't do backups :o(
Time for
Domain names changing
The new parents impose rules
Am I in high school?
-Original Message-
From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Haiku Friday
Thank God this is done
New Switch is finally installed
Good morning to you all:
Currently the company I work for is looking at putting up a second
OWA server. As part of our due diligence in making sure that we have the
most betta solution, I'm looking for products that have the same
functionality as OWA and that will interface with
Gawds, look for a Haiku version of Beowulf.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925
-Original Message-
From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
Haiku is my life
Writing them for a living
Gives me inner strength
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
Domain names changing
The new parents impose rules
Am I in
To get paid to write
the haiku is amazing
what's your per word rate?
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
I think that technologies are morally neutral until we apply them. It's only
when we use them for good or for evil that they become
Hi Everyone,
2 servers (one NT4 sp6a, one W2k sp2)in same site, both Ex5.5 sp4. CLients
are OL2000
I have been moving mailboxes (using the Move Mailbox tool in the Exchange
Admin program) from the older (NT4) server to the newer (W2k) machine
without any problems, beyond having to once or twice
Doesn't indicate anything having to do with relaying.
Most likely, it was spam addressed to invalid addresses at your domain, and
the reply-to address is invalid as well.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine
It all depends on what functionality you want. There are at least a few
front ends available for IMAP servers that would do basic mail handling, but
OWA is the only one that would cut the groupware features.
TWIG seems pretty cool from an IMAP viewer.
This is part of a bigger question, and I'm not sure if I agree with the
means behind it but I'll ask anyway.
Recently my IT manager and some of the other guys on the team have taken a
deeper interest in AV, almost to the point of hiring a guy that does AV and
only AV. They are also talking
Can I charge per read
If so you all owe me lots
Show me the money!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Drewski
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
To get paid to write
the haiku is
Antigen allows for up to 4 different AV engines to scan everythingCA,
Sophos, and I think Mcafee and Symantec...
Bill Lambert
Endoxy Healthcare
847-941-9206
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:37
The old standby: http://www.mail-resources.com/koans/51899.htm
-Original Message-
From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
This has been discussed ad nauseum in the
Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural of nauseum is?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:39 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: New Mail Notification
Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
The
I think its Nixon
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural of nauseum is?
-Original Message-
From:
'nother Latin lesson:
nausea (sing.), nauseae (plu.)
cos I never listen to beggin'
Am off to the pub now for drinkiepoos (plu.)
Have a good wk-end all!
E.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the
Sitting here thinking.
Computers and the weekend.
Go home, play a game.
This email message may contain confidential information of Integrated
Biosystems, Inc., and is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any
review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by
You read my haiku
So as far as I'm concerned
We are now even
-Original Message-
From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
Can I charge per read
If so you all owe me lots
Show me the
See http://www.slipstick.com/exs/relay.htm To prevent SMTP relaying with
Microsoft Exchange Server
Tim Tullis
Director, MIS
Greater Lexington Chamber of Commerce
www.lexchamber.com
859-226-1625
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16,
Nav for Exchange in VAPI mode (or mixed with Mapi) is not actually causing a
corruption but is rather causing a latency with how it scans mail. There is
a setting to scan mail in the background which will scan all messages in
advance. If you turn that on and allow an hour per GB of Information
Please respond if you have experience with any e-mail management software
that assists in managing the user mail store size with the added
capibility of message archiving after a specified time frame, size, etc.
We are interested reviewing any products that can assit in automating the
management
www.wirelessknowledge.com
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Replacement for OWA
Good morning to you all:
Currently the company I work for is looking at putting up a second
Anyone care to comment?
http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2814683,00.html
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Well, first I should have spelled it correctly: ad nauseam
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural of
I don't think you would want (nor would it work to have) two AV products on
the Exchange servers.
The approach we use is to have a mail relay running Trend's InterScan
VirusWall scanning everything between the Internet and Exchange. Works like
a dream...
Microsoft Exchange Server Mailbox Manager (Add-In). Located somewhere on
the CD Rom.
-Original Message-
From: Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Mail Storage Management
Please respond if you have
I read it a while ago. Microsoft bashing mixed with some Admin 101 level
advice about keeping security patches up to date and some other things that
should have been taken care of when Outlook was deployed on an organization
level.
A pathetic attempt to convince admins to move backward to mail
I wouldn't want to put two different AV all on the Exchange server. I'd
prefer the setup where you use one AV at the SMTP gateway, and another
one on Exchange box. If you are really paranoid, you can put a third AV
for your desktops...
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
I believe Veritas has an add on to their Exchange Backup component that will
perfom some of these tasks.
-Original Message-
From: Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Mail Storage Management
Please
I was referring to two separate products in-house, not on the Exch Server.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 1:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: a 2nd antivirus
I wouldn't want to put two different AV all on the
This has been talked about before.
Whatever is the dominant application will see the dominant hacks, security
holes and
have viruses written just for them.
If your users are satisfied with the free products that are out then use
them.
We used pegasus mail back in the early 90's...
Two AV is good
One for servers, one at desk
This haiku not good.
Having two will increase your chances of detection -- I like having one at
the server side and different product at the desktop. Anything that slips
past the server product will hopefully be caught by the desktop one.
I wouldn't
Better than Dave Wilson, in the L.A. Times, who yesterday wrote a fairly
ignorant piece advocating the same thing. At least this guy acknowledes
that Outlook is for more than, to use Mr. Wilson's terminology, e-mail
browsing.
Wilson suggests replacing it with Poco, Becky, Allegro, Pegasus or
Bankers it is true
Hear money squeal as it leaves
Their locked-down wallet
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
You work for a bank
What did you really expect?
Candy
I prefer Outlook. I use a policy to keep it locked down on the client side.
I don't believe that the problem stems from the creation of Outlook. The
problem is that some admins are not pro-active. Others are simply too
busy or overworked. I think most engineers know what to do they just have
Noted and agreed.
What about lurking readers
Should we charge them lots?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Winterton, Robert
K
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
You read my haiku
you can charge me lots
But you will never get paid
Broke and overworked
-Original Message-
From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
Noted and agreed.
What about lurking readers
Should
That is very strange
I have never seen you here
But, you must work here
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
you can charge me lots
But
Also, there are a few neat tricks you can implement on the client side to
ease administration of Outlook. Rather than bash on it why not just
administer. There are some simple registry hacks you can implement for
.vbs, .js, etc... scripts so that they open in notepad instead of executing.
Also,
I agree. In your case, an IDS would be the most effective plan.
Denis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: a 2nd antivirus
This is part of a bigger
I have seen her here
I can vouche for Jennifer
Her Haiku is leet
Denis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Barry Patterson
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
That is very strange
I
I have been busy
I lost my slacker license
Toss me a beer please
-Original Message-
From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
I have seen her here
I can vouche for Jennifer
Her Haiku is
Know she's on this list
I meant at my workplace here
I'm low paid and overworked...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Denis Baldwin
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
I have seen her
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
