here is to uninstall and reinstall NAV for
Exchange.
> --
> From: Alverson, Tom
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 2, 2003 13:45
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
>
> Mapi/
: Monday, June 02, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
Have you tried it in MAPI only mode? Are there any other potentially
related events in the App or Sys logs?
Another possibility looming here is to uninstall and reinstall NAV for
Exchange
Monday, June 2, 2003 13:45
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
>
> Mapi/vapi
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:53 PM
> To: Exchange Dis
D]
> Sent: Monday, June 2, 2003 12:48
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
>
> It's doing it again...
>
> After the below changes NAV ran for about 10 minutes and then gave me the
> error messages once. It then ran anot
What mode are you running in? MAPI? MAPI/VAPI?
Nate
> --
> From: Alverson, Tom
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 2, 2003 12:48
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
>
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
I have seen this occur on our servers in two instances.
1) While you may have done this already. Stop and restart
it.
HTH...let us know what worked.
Jim Blunt
Bechtel Hanford, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
I have seen this occur on our servers in tw
l it.
HTH...let us know what worked.
Jim Blunt
Bechtel Hanford, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
I have seen this occur on our servers in two
I have seen this occur on our servers in two instances.
1) While you may have done this already. Stop and restart the NAV services.
I have seen where they will whack out and doing thill settle them down.
2) The other thing I have seen and you have alluded to it here is that the
virus DAT file may
Are you talking of the Exchange Agent from NAV or the NAV Product for
virus protection?
If you are talking about the Exchange Agent, it could be that your
definitions file has been corrupted. Try to do a liveupdate again. If
that doesn't work, then attempt to retrieve the latest def. file
manual
Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:58 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
>
>
> So your solution with "a few outbreaks" is better than NAV?
> We use NAV and have had none. Not even close. I
Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I think he meant the Secret Cabal handshake. Oh wait, there is no Secret
Cabal.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange
Of course not.
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
There is no Secret Cabal handshake.
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net
]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Sorry bud, but you're likely to make Martin mad since it's his list. Though
everyone's should look about the same with varying differences here and
there.
D
"Saving the world
I think he meant the Secret Cabal handshake. Oh wait, there is no Secret
Cabal.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
::High Five::
-Original
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
We ain't huggin! ;o) How about a secret handshake or something?
D
"Incompetence: When you Earnestly Believe you can compensate fo
Everyone should be using something of that sort, we would have a much better
email world that way.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Sorry bud, but you&#x
EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:06 AM
To: Powell, Ken
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
::High Five::
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
We
::High Five Back at ya::
D
"Burnout: Attitudes are contagious, mine might kill you." - -
http://www.despair.com
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Ex
::High Five::
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
We ain't huggin! ;o) How about a secret handshake or something?
D
"Incompetence: When you
::Sputter::
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I am using that, and got file blocking really tricked out with Don Ely's
list of attachments to block!
T
-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Id give you a big hug if it wouldn't be all awkward, then would have to
punch each other to maintain a manly appearance.
-Original Mess
Id give you a big hug if it wouldn't be all awkward, then would have to
punch each other to maintain a manly appearance.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchang
I agree that Antigen is better than NAV for Exchange, we have not had any
problems with it for over a year. This is also a test because as of yet I
have been unable to post a question
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/re
Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I am using that, and got file blocking really tricked out with Don Ely's
list of attachments to block!
Thanks for everyone's input. I will try to talk t
ble free system like Tom and James have(but will
keep Scanmail handy just incase)
Thanks!
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Using AVAPI and File B
Then the people across the street don't know WTF they are doing. That is the
only answer.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Tom...I agree wit
Using AVAPI and File Blocking? If not, you should be.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2
A That, I can see... :o)
D
"Burnout: Attitudes are contagious, mine might kill you." - -
http://www.despair.com
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Ex
, December 28, 2001 12:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
You're running W2K Adv. Server on a P-133??? I seriously doubt that!
D
"Mistakes: It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a
warning to others."
-Original Message-
AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Ex
I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and
hed taters and
green beans for us. Time will tell.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
So your solution with "a few outbreaks" is better than NAV?
EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
So your solution with "a few outbreaks" is better than NAV? We use NAV and
have had none. Not even close. I just watch the stuff get ditched
into the quarantine.Sounds
Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and what SP is your Exch
server on?
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I feel the same way. I really researched
on
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground
round Your company will be very sorry it made thi
To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
>
> If you have Scanmail on your servers now, it makes no sense to change to
> Groupsucks. As Martin has told you, you got good stuff now, you're going
> to
> get rotten stuff if management keeps on keeping on
: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round
Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have
TECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:38
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
>
> Sybari Antigen for Exchange (www.sybari.com) is the best A/V Solution for
> your Exchange Server.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ron Grant
hange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Kelly would agree with you on that.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROT
: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Sybari Antigen for Exchange (www.sybari.com) is the best A/V Solution for
your Exchange Server.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Hi Folks,
I
28, 2001 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Sybari Antigen for Exchange (www.sybari.com) is the best A/V Solution for
your Exchange Server.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:17 AM
To: Exchange
) 239 - 2981
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prim
: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round
Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have
Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down
on this and fight
Sybari Antigen for Exchange (www.sybari.com) is the best A/V Solution for
your Exchange Server.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Hi Folks,
I just found out we are
ay, December 28, 2001 11:28 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
You should really look at the archives for this answer.
All the rants are contained there.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and
Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round
Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have
Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down
on this and fight it all the way to the top.
-Original Message-
I searched for "NAV for Exchange" but didn't find any threads on it. What
should I search for?
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
You should
You should really look at the archives for this answer.
All the rants are contained there.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mail
49 matches
Mail list logo
