--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In 1994 Hagelin was the recipient of an Ig Nobel Prize,
which is for achievements that cannot, or should not,
be reproduced, i.e., for pseudoscience.
Following is a list of the 2006 Ig Noble Prize
winners; the awards were
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should anyone ever been seen floating during a YF competition, and
James Randi forced to pay up his $1 million challenge, the ME might
well be revisited in a big way by the larger scientific community.
Should pigs fly,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should anyone ever been seen floating during a YF competition, and
James Randi forced to pay up his $1 million challenge, the ME might
well
On Jan 8, 2006, at 8:29 PM, sparaig wrote:The ME theory is a large numbers theory. The crime rate of Fairfield could be skewed by having a single pickpocket living among the sidhas. For that matter, the traffic accident rate during the Taste of Utopia course could go up because the town's
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ME theory is a large numbers theory. The crime
rate of Fairfield
could be skewed by having a single pickpocket living
among the
sidhas. For that matter, the traffic accident rate
during the Taste
of Utopia course could go up because the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 2006, at 8:29 PM, sparaig wrote:
The ME theory is a large numbers theory. The crime rate of
Fairfield
could be skewed by having a single pickpocket living among the
sidhas. For that matter, the traffic
On Jan 9, 2006, at 10:20 AM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 8, 2006, at 8:29 PM, sparaig wrote: The ME theory is a large numbers theory. The crime rate of Fairfield could be skewed by having a single pickpocket living among the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ME theory is a large numbers theory. The crime
rate of Fairfield
could be skewed by having a single pickpocket living
among the
sidhas. For that matter, the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2006, at 10:20 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 2006, at 8:29 PM, sparaig wrote:
The ME theory is a large numbers theory. The crime
On Jan 9, 2006, at 10:50 AM, authfriend wrote: But for some people it will be hard to let go of these dreams of glory daze and rising sunshine. You mean, like the fact that international conflict has very sharply declined in recent years? Do you think that's because of lowered numbers of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2006, at 10:20 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 2006, at 8:29 PM, sparaig wrote:
The ME theory is a large numbers theory. The crime
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 2006, at 8:29 PM, sparaig wrote:
The ME theory is a large numbers theory. The crime rate of
Fairfield
could be skewed by having a single pickpocket living among the
sidhas. For that matter, the traffic
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ME theory is a large numbers theory. The crime
rate of Fairfield
could be skewed by having a single pickpocket living
among the
sidhas. For that matter, the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2006, at 10:20 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 2006, at 8:29 PM, sparaig wrote:
The ME theory is a large numbers theory. The crime
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2006, at 10:20 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jan
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
rather than on the people arround him. For the ME to work as you
suggest, that 1 person should overwhelm the negativity of 10,000
people since 1% of 10,000 is 100, and 1% of 100 is 1.
the SQUAREROOT of 10,000 is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
rather than on the people arround him. For the ME to work as you
suggest, that 1 person should overwhelm the negativity of 10,000
people
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a big-number theory as I have said. I believe they were talking
in terms of 100 yogic fliers having a noticable effect on the
surrounding population, which translates back into a minimum
population of 1 million
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's a big-number theory as I have said. I believe they were
talking
in terms of 100 yogic fliers having a noticable effect on the
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- markmeredith2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's good that tmo scientists try to get
published,
but the spirit of
the whole effort seems to fall more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- markmeredith2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's good that tmo scientists
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- markmeredith2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's good that tmo scientists
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In 1994 Hagelin was the recipient of an Ig Nobel Prize, which is for
achievements that cannot, or should not, be reproduced, i.e.,
for
pseudoscience. In his case the prize was awarded for his
experimental
conclusion
Part of this is completely false and misleading. Hagelin's
groundbreaking work started BECAUSE he linked MMY's Vedic Cosmology
to Western Science. After some discussions with MMY in Switzerland,
Hagelin started sifting through existing theories, looking for one
that best fit MMY's
Vaj:
How do you incorporate hyperlinks in your text? It really works
great!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oops:
In 1994 Hagelin was the recipient of an Ig Nobel Prize, which is
for
achievements that cannot, or should not, be reproduced, i.e.,
for
On a Mac you just paste text as html.On Jan 7, 2006, at 12:40 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:Vaj: How do you incorporate hyperlinks in your text? It really works great!
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join
On Jan 7, 2006, at 12:18 PM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In 1994 Hagelin was the recipient of an Ig Nobel Prize, which is for "achievements" that "cannot, or should not, be reproduced", i.e., for pseudoscience. In his case the prize was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In 1994 Hagelin was the recipient of an Ig Nobel Prize, which is
for
achievements that cannot, or should not, be reproduced, i.e.,
for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:47 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
Wikepedia is the biggest crock of shit. Half of it written by
halfwits who have little expertise in the field they are spouting
about. Quoting from it will take you 6
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:47 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
Wikepedia is the biggest crock of shit. Half of it written by
halfwits who have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:47 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
Wikepedia is the biggest crock of shit. Half of it written by
halfwits who have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Vaj:
How do you incorporate hyperlinks in your text? It really works
great!
On a PC, click in the Address box of the browser window when you're on
the page you want to link to, to select the URL, then Ctrl-C to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- markmeredith2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's good that tmo scientists try to get published,
but the spirit of
the whole effort seems to fall more under PR than
science - and until
at least one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2006, at 12:18 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In 1994 Hagelin was the recipient of an Ig Nobel Prize, which is
for
achievements that cannot, or should
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In 1994 Hagelin was the recipient of an Ig Nobel Prize, which is
for achievements that cannot, or should not, be reproduced,
i.e., for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In 1994 Hagelin was the recipient of an Ig Nobel Prize, which is
for
achievements that cannot, or should not, be reproduced, i.e.,
for
pseudoscience. In his case the prize was awarded for his
experimental
conclusion
On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:47 AM, off_world_beings wrote:Wikepedia is the biggest crock of shit. Half of it written by halfwits who have little expertise in the field they are spouting about. Quoting from it will take you 6 months to a year to regain your credibility. Just a friendly peice of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:47 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
Wikepedia is the biggest crock of shit. Half of it written by
halfwits who have little expertise in the field they are spouting
about. Quoting from it will take you 6
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:47 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
Wikepedia is the biggest crock of shit. Half of it written by
halfwits who have little expertise in the field they are spouting
about. Quoting from it will take you 6
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:47 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
Wikepedia is the biggest crock of shit. Half of it written by
halfwits who have little expertise in the field they are spouting
about. Quoting from it will take you 6
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:47 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
Wikepedia is the biggest crock of shit. Half of it written by
halfwits who have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In 1994 Hagelin was the recipient of an Ig Nobel Prize, which is for
achievements that cannot, or should not, be reproduced, i.e.,
for pseudoscience.
No, in fact the Ig Nobel is not just for
pseudoscience, so sorry to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:47 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
Wikepedia is the biggest crock of shit. Half of it written by
halfwits who have little
On Jan 6, 2006, at 10:43 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:47 AM, off_world_beings wrote: Wikepedia is the biggest crock of shit. Half of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In 1994 Hagelin was the recipient of an Ig Nobel Prize, which is
for
achievements that cannot, or should not, be reproduced, i.e.,
for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 6, 2006, at 10:43 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jan 6, 2006,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:47 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
Wikepedia is the biggest crock of shit. Half of it written by
halfwits who have little expertise in the field they are spouting
about. Quoting from it will take you 6
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:47 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In 1994 Hagelin was the recipient of an Ig Nobel Prize, which
On Jan 6, 2006, at 11:29 AM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:47 AM, off_world_beings wrote: Wikepedia is the biggest crock of shit. Half of it written by halfwits who have little expertise in the field they are spouting
--- markmeredith2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's good that tmo scientists try to get published,
but the spirit of
the whole effort seems to fall more under PR than
science - and until
at least one independent scientist is impressed
enough by the
maharishi effect research to begin
53 matches
Mail list logo
