[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-09 Thread cardemaister
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote: On Nov 8, 2011, at 9:40 AM, cardemaister wrote: Well, duh! That's rather exactly what according to PJ seems to be the conditio sine qua non of (asaMprajñaata?)-samaadhi (for upaaya-pratyaya-yogi_s):

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-09 Thread cardemaister
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote: On Nov 8, 2011, at 9:40 AM, cardemaister wrote: Well, duh! That's rather exactly what according to PJ seems to be the conditio sine qua non of (asaMprajñaata?)-samaadhi (for upaaya-pratyaya-yogi_s):

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread turquoiseb
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jpgillam jpgillam@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: On Nov 6, 2011, at 8:58 PM, johnt wrote: You never will in a TM context, but if you study some of Milton Erickson, Bandler and Grinder and other related sources

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread Vaj
On Nov 7, 2011, at 7:40 PM, feste37 wrote: Good question. I did TM for more than 30 years, but then about 7 or 8 years ago, I lost the desire to do it. This happened quite quickly, as I recall, over a period of maybe a few months. I just no longer had any desire to meditate, so I stopped

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread feste37
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote: On Nov 7, 2011, at 7:40 PM, feste37 wrote: Good question. I did TM for more than 30 years, but then about 7 or 8 years ago, I lost the desire to do it. This happened quite quickly, as I recall, over a period of

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread Vaj
On Nov 8, 2011, at 4:38 AM, turquoiseb wrote: I wouldn't use the words placebo effect, as Vaj does I'd more specifically call it expectation effect from indoctrination, that expectation creating a style of placebo relaxation response. It really seems to center around belief. If you do

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread whynotnow7
Hi Patrick, no need to consider these two failures with coarse nervous systems. They wouldn't feel the puja if it smacked them in the face (and I wish it would). Opinions by one fool who hasn't meditated or done his puja for 40+ years and another who never learned it. Such hubris and BS. ---

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread Tom Pall
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Vaj vajradh...@earthlink.net wrote: On Nov 7, 2011, at 7:40 PM, feste37 wrote: Good question. I did TM for more than 30 years, but then about 7 or 8 years ago, I lost the desire to do it. This happened quite quickly, as I recall, over a period of maybe a

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread Vaj
On Nov 8, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Tom Pall wrote: So why do you think people seem to get diminishing returns with decades of doing TM/TMSP? It's all so exciting during the first few years of TM, the first 2 advanced techniques, the first few years of the TMSP.I just can't buy the argument

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@... wrote: Hi Patrick, no need to consider these two failures with coarse nervous systems. They wouldn't feel the puja if it smacked them in the face (and I wish it would). Opinions by one fool who hasn't meditated or done his

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread cardemaister
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote: On Nov 8, 2011, at 4:38 AM, turquoiseb wrote: I wouldn't use the words placebo effect, as Vaj does I'd more specifically call it expectation effect from indoctrination, that expectation creating a style of placebo

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread raunchydog
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: Patrick, I do not deny your experience with the TM puja, but I would suggest another explanatin for it. I wouldn't use the words placebo effect, as Vaj does, but I would certainly call any subjective effect

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread feste37
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.pall@... wrote: On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote: On Nov 7, 2011, at 7:40 PM, feste37 wrote: Good question. I did TM for more than 30 years, but then about 7 or 8 years ago, I lost the desire to do

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread Bob Price
...@earthlink.net To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2011 5:10:26 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK On Nov 8, 2011, at 4:38 AM, turquoiseb wrote: I wouldn't use the words placebo effect, as Vaj  does I'd more specifically call

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread turquoiseb
Thanks for following up, Vaj. This topic interests me. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote: On Nov 8, 2011, at 4:38 AM, turquoiseb wrote: I wouldn't use the words placebo effect, as Vaj does I'd more specifically call it expectation effect from

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread whynotnow7
Thanks for that - all I can say about the Puja is that it worked. It enabled me to use a mantra that transformed my life completely. Having been an altar boy, I can say that the rituals of Christianity, although practiced widely, can't compare to the soft and powerful transcendence of the Puja.

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread richardwillytexwilliams
turquoiseb: The reason is that in the years between then and now I've had many more experiences, some of which put the earlier experiences in the shade and raised the bar on my internal Woo Scale. What I used to consider a 9 I now consider a 4. I'm sure you get what I'm talking

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread whynotnow7
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@ wrote: Hi Patrick, no need to consider these two failures with coarse nervous systems. They wouldn't feel the puja if it smacked them in the face (and

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread richardwillytexwilliams
whynotnow: It is simply bizarre to me why someone who has not done these things for so many years would even care to comment on them... Vaj reminds me of how John Manning used to spam the Mormon news forum, I guess because John at one time was married to a Mormon girl, back in 1970. But,

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread maskedzebra
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jpgillam jpgillam@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: On Nov 6, 2011, at 8:58 PM, johnt wrote: You never will in a TM context, but if you study some of Milton Erickson, Bandler and Grinder and other related sources

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread Vaj
On Nov 8, 2011, at 9:40 AM, cardemaister wrote: Well, duh! That's rather exactly what according to PJ seems to be the conditio sine qua non of (asaMprajñaata?)-samaadhi (for upaaya-pratyaya-yogi_s): *shraddhaa*-viirya-smRti-samaadhi-prajñaa-puurvaka itareSaam! shraddhA f. faith , trust ,

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread Vaj
On Nov 8, 2011, at 9:40 AM, cardemaister wrote: Well, duh! That's rather exactly what according to PJ seems to be the conditio sine qua non of (asaMprajñaata?)-samaadhi (for upaaya-pratyaya-yogi_s): BTW, it's samprajnata NOT asamprajnata.

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread jpgillam
Responses interleaved below... --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: If you think back on it, what could possibly BE more of an exercise in moodmaking than the way we were taught to perform the puja? It (at least as taught on my TTC) was *not* about the mere power of the

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread turquoiseb
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jpgillam jpgillam@... wrote: Responses interleaved below... --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: If you think back on it, what could possibly BE more of an exercise in moodmaking than the way we were taught to perform the puja?

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread Vaj
On Nov 8, 2011, at 11:09 AM, turquoiseb wrote: The reason is that in the years between then and now I've had many more experiences, some of which put the earlier experiences in the shade and raised the bar on my internal Woo Scale. What I used to consider a 9 I now consider a 4. I'm

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread emptybill
Vag: And unless one knows how to defeat mental laxity and excitation at the subtle level, one can never reach the level of complete pacification of afflictive emotional states like aggression or cravings. What Vag is not telling you is that this explanation is just standard Mahayana Buddhist

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread Yifu
To Vaj: ok, you experienced nothing of value from what you thought was TM but wasn't really. And, you prefer Mindfulness and Vipassana. Very good! http://www.popaganda.com/media/blogs/store/SuperSuppercropped.JPG --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote: On Nov 8,

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread Vaj
On Nov 8, 2011, at 5:09 PM, Yifu wrote: To Vaj: ok, you experienced nothing of value from what you thought was TM but wasn't really. And, you prefer Mindfulness and Vipassana. Very good! It's all good IMO. There's a lot of wonderful people I would've missed if it weren't for TM. And I

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread Vaj
On Nov 8, 2011, at 5:09 PM, emptybill wrote: Vag: And unless one knows how to defeat mental laxity and excitation at the subtle level, one can never reach the level of complete pacification of afflictive emotional states like aggression or cravings. What Vag is not telling you is that

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-08 Thread johnt
Not as far as I know but some of the subsequent practitioners may have. Milton Erickson did call the state of meditation (transcendence) the state of no trance. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnt johnlasher20002000@

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread Vaj
On Nov 6, 2011, at 9:56 PM, johnt johnlasher20002...@yahoo.com wrote: Then what is it saying. Be precise I value tradition in the sense that it preserves elements that are life supporting, it doesn't tell me how it works. That's what modern psychologists are only beginning to try and do

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread Vaj
On Nov 6, 2011, at 8:58 PM, johnt johnlasher20002...@yahoo.com wrote: You never will in a TM context, but if you study some of Milton Erickson, Bandler and Grinder and other related sources you will find that each part of a TM initiation has a well studied neurolinguistic effect which in

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread jpgillam
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: On Nov 6, 2011, at 8:58 PM, johnt wrote: You never will in a TM context, but if you study some of Milton Erickson, Bandler and Grinder and other related sources you will find that each part of a TM initiation has a well studied

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread Vaj
On Nov 7, 2011, at 10:17 AM, jpgillam wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: On Nov 6, 2011, at 8:58 PM, johnt wrote: You never will in a TM context, but if you study some of Milton Erickson, Bandler and Grinder and other related sources you will find that each part

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnt johnlasher20002000@... wrote: You never will in a TM context, but if you study some of Milton Erickson, Bandler and Grinder and other related sources you will find that each part of a TM initiation has a well studied neurolinguistic effect Did

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote: On Nov 7, 2011, at 10:17 AM, jpgillam wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: On Nov 6, 2011, at 8:58 PM, johnt wrote: You never will in a TM context, but if you study some of Milton Erickson,

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread emptybill
This is the usual disinformation from Vag, the master of misanthropic subterfuge. Here are the reality of the TM Puja: Acharya Vandana Puja sourced and translated by Paul Mason: http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/TMpuja.htm --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote: We

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread richardwillytexwilliams
Vaj: ...it does not come from a real lineal tradition, it's something Mahesh made up. What exactly, are the parts by MMY that are different from those recited by GD? From what I've heard, the MMY GD puja is standard - I've heard it recited by at least three sources other than the TMO, such

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread richardwillytexwilliams
emptybill: This is the usual disinformation from Vag, the master of misanthropic subterfuge. Here are the reality of the TM Puja: It looks like we've got another fib by Vaj, but why would he be fibbing, when it's so easy to source the material? Go figure. Acharya Vandana Puja sourced

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread Vaj
On Nov 7, 2011, at 12:25 PM, richardwillytexwilliams wrote: emptybill: This is the usual disinformation from Vag, the master of misanthropic subterfuge. Here are the reality of the TM Puja: It looks like we've got another fib by Vaj, but why would he be fibbing, when it's so easy to

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread Bhairitu
The first thing any research needs to do is to learn the procedures and they won't do that so they'll always be spectators and draw false conclusions. Shakti is simply life force, a concept beyond the ability of contemporary science to understand. One should also look into the yoga of sound

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote: On Nov 7, 2011, at 12:25 PM, richardwillytexwilliams wrote: emptybill: This is the usual disinformation from Vag, the master of misanthropic subterfuge. Here are the reality of the TM Puja: It looks like

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread Vaj
On Nov 7, 2011, at 12:18 PM, richardwillytexwilliams wrote: Vaj: ...it does not come from a real lineal tradition, it's something Mahesh made up. What exactly, are the parts by MMY that are different from those recited by GD? From what I've heard, the MMY GD puja is standard - I've heard it

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread Yifu
Vaj, you need to apologize for your deceitful subterfuge: http://www.kohngallery.com/ryden/pages/ryden.artwork1.html --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote: On Nov 7, 2011, at 12:18 PM, richardwillytexwilliams wrote: Vaj: ...it does not come from a real lineal

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread jpgillam
On Nov 7, 2011, at 10:17 AM, jpgillam wrote: I've been getting results from the TM puja for 34 years. It stills my mind. I recite it often, for that purpose. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: The way we know the TM puja and initiation process acts like a

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread johnt
Since you seem to not be aware of it NLP deals extensively with sound vibration known as auditory tonal as contrasted to auditory digital which deals with the meaning of words. Read a little before you comment. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote: The first thing

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread Bhairitu
Sorry but I just don't buy the NLP story. It just sounds like a ignorant flatlander theory. On 11/07/2011 12:54 PM, johnt wrote: Since you seem to not be aware of it NLP deals extensively with sound vibration known as auditory tonal as contrasted to auditory digital which deals with the

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread maskedzebra
Vaj: The majority of TM initiators not only stopped teaching TM, but have probably even stopped meditating. I am almost certain of this. However, for you to propose that the Puja ceremony works on the basis of the placebo effect is so bizarre and misinformed as to be the same as saying that

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread Tom Pall
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:27 PM, jpgillam jpgil...@yahoo.com wrote: My most profound experience of the stilling power of the puja occurred when I was learning it on my TM teacher training course. One afternoon upon finishing my rounds I sang the puja as I sat on my bed. Afterward, I had

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread John
Vaj, You should do some research before making such disingenuous statements. Parts of the TM puja actually can be found in the Vishnu kavach which is stated in Srila Prabhupada's commentary to the Srimad Bhagavatam. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote: On Nov

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread Susan
Wait a minute, Vaj. The TM puja is the same as used by many Hindus. When I initiated Hindus from India they could sing it along with me - pretty much word for word. What ever else you might think of TM, this is not something MMY hobbled together at all. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread obbajeeba
[X-(] Vag, your vag is showing. [X-(] --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Susan wayback71@... wrote: Wait a minute, Vaj. The TM puja is the same as used by many Hindus. When I initiated Hindus from India they could sing it along with me - pretty much word for word. What ever else you

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote: On Nov 6, 2011, at 9:56 PM, johnt johnlasher20002000@... wrote: Then what is it saying. Be precise I value tradition in the sense that it preserves elements that are life supporting, it doesn't tell me how it works.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread Bhairitu
It's cobbled from a number of different recitations and shuddhis including the guru puja. The tradition of masters is the only thing that is probably TM unique. There is no one standard puja. Offerings different and length according to who is performing the puja. On 11/07/2011 01:50 PM,

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread Yifu
Right - also most of it is identical to the ritualistic verses in Muktananda's texts dispensed in the SYDA org...; except for the part going Brahmananda Saraswati, ... Vaj has discredited himself, exposing his true identity as a mere Snow Yak:

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread Vaj
On Nov 7, 2011, at 4:18 PM, maskedzebra wrote: The majority of TM initiators not only stopped teaching TM, but have probably even stopped meditating. I am almost certain of this. That's true. It was actually true before recertification was required. However, for you to propose that the

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread feste37
As a former TM teacher who taught hundreds of people but no longer practices TM, I would say that MZ is absolutely correct here in every point he so eloquently makes. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, maskedzebra no_reply@... wrote: Vaj: The majority of TM initiators not only

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread Vaj
On Nov 7, 2011, at 4:40 PM, John wrote: Vaj, You should do some research before making such disingenuous statements. Parts of the TM puja actually can be found in the Vishnu kavach which is stated in Srila Prabhupada's commentary to the Srimad Bhagavatam. I'm well aware that it was

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread Vaj
On Nov 7, 2011, at 4:50 PM, Susan wrote: Wait a minute, Vaj. The TM puja is the same as used by many Hindus. When I initiated Hindus from India they could sing it along with me - pretty much word for word. What ever else you might think of TM, this is not something MMY hobbled together at

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread Vaj
On Nov 7, 2011, at 4:57 PM, Bhairitu wrote: It's cobbled from a number of different recitations and shuddhis including the guru puja. The tradition of masters is the only thing that is probably TM unique. There is no one standard puja. Offerings different and length according to who is

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread Vaj
On Nov 7, 2011, at 6:00 PM, feste37 wrote: As a former TM teacher who taught hundreds of people but no longer practices TM, I would say that MZ is absolutely correct here in every point he so eloquently makes. If I may ask: why on earth did you stop doing TM Feste?

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread Yifu
There's a Magical quality to TM you'll never get unless you actually do it. No amount of data regarding the outer, superficial properties of TM can penetrate the outer coverings (what can be written down in a book); and get into the Absolute heart of the matter. A pissing contest enumerating

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread feste37
Good question. I did TM for more than 30 years, but then about 7 or 8 years ago, I lost the desire to do it. This happened quite quickly, as I recall, over a period of maybe a few months. I just no longer had any desire to meditate, so I stopped doing it and have never gone back to it. Having

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread johnt
Frankly I don't give a rat's ass what you buy or don't --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote: Sorry but I just don't buy the NLP story. It just sounds like a ignorant flatlander theory. On 11/07/2011 12:54 PM, johnt wrote: Since you seem to not be aware of it

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-07 Thread John
If so, do you consider yourself to be in cosmic consciousness or higher? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@... wrote: Good question. I did TM for more than 30 years, but then about 7 or 8 years ago, I lost the desire to do it. This happened quite quickly, as I recall,

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-06 Thread Buck
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Denise Evans dmevans365@... wrote: Sheeet.  Is that what brainwashing is? From: johnt johnlasher20002000@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2011 11:17 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife]

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-06 Thread Buck
From: johnt johnlasher20002000@ To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2011 11:17 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK   Why TM can't be learned from a book A TM initiation alters

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-06 Thread merudanda
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbxUXAMUeGk --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Denise Evans dmevans365@... wrote: Sheeet. please please do not make the walking mantra of my kids public!! Is that what brainwashing is? From: johnt johnlasher20002000@...

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-06 Thread merudanda
thanks ..now finally i got it [:D] --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@... wrote: Also why Guru Dev and Maharishi encouraged people to sit with saints. The spiritual entrainment of the company you keep...a wide acceptance by the medical community do adopt the practice of

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-06 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Denise Evans dmevans365@... wrote: Sheeet. Is that what brainwashing is? Nope. It's not necessarily what *TM* is, either. I don't know where johnt picked up this purported explanation, but I've never encountered it in the TM context.

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-06 Thread obbajeeba
Denise, I do TM and I do not see it as brainwashing, other than washing the brain of clutter, naturally. I like it. It makes me feel good. All the crap of people trying to manipulate in the TMO, are only that of people who had previously manipulating behaviors, IMHO, and not the result of

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-06 Thread Denise Evans
Entrainment...expressed beautifully in a song.   From: merudanda no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, November 6, 2011 4:30 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-06 Thread Denise Evans
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, November 6, 2011 9:29 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK   Denise, I do TM and I do not see it as brainwashing, other than washing the brain of clutter, naturally. I like it. It makes me feel good. All the crap of people

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-06 Thread johnt
try reading some of Bandler and Grinder and some NLP research and educate yourself or just stay stupid --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Denise Evans dmevans365@... wrote: Sheeet.  Is that what brainwashing is? From: johnt johnlasher20002000@...

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-06 Thread Denise Evans
@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, November 6, 2011 5:49 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK   try reading some of Bandler and Grinder and some NLP research and educate yourself or just stay stupid --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Denise Evans dmevans365@... wrote

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-06 Thread johnt
You never will in a TM context, but if you study some of Milton Erickson, Bandler and Grinder and other related sources you will find that each part of a TM initiation has a well studied neurolinguistic effect which in this case is very effective at producing a self transcending accessing cue

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-06 Thread johnt
charge is a nice ooga booga term that says nothing. It's only part of philosophy not science unless you understand it in the sense of Rupert sheldrake' morphic field, in which case your saying the same thing I am. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote: That's a

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK (Denise)

2011-11-06 Thread johnt
@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, November 6, 2011 5:49 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK   try reading some of Bandler and Grinder and some NLP research and educate yourself or just stay stupid --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-06 Thread Bhairitu
Oh yes it does. Centuries of tantrics and yogis would argue with you on that. These guys you are talking about are blind men feeling an elephant. :-D On 11/06/2011 06:00 PM, johnt wrote: charge is a nice ooga booga term that says nothing. It's only part of philosophy not science unless you

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK (Denise)

2011-11-06 Thread johnt
@ To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, November 6, 2011 5:49 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK   try reading some of Bandler and Grinder and some NLP research and educate yourself or just stay stupid --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Denise

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-06 Thread johnt
Then what is it saying. Be precise I value tradition in the sense that it preserves elements that are life supporting, it doesn't tell me how it works. That's what modern psychologists are only beginning to try and do do. Vedic masters were masters of what's now becoming NLP, however people

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-06 Thread Bhairitu
I'm talking about shakti which is an energy. You should be experiencing it when you meditate. I can transfer that energy to someone else without saying a word, just by touching them. So explain that by NLP. You can't. They are going down the wrong road though they wouldn't be the first

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK

2011-11-06 Thread johnt
No one can explain what the shakti energy is yet but they certainly agree it can be passed on through the process known as entrainment. There is some early research that may indicate that shakti can be seen on kirlian photography and others can be seen being entrained by it, but it's still

[FairfieldLife] Re: WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK (Ken Wilber)

2011-11-06 Thread johnt
Ken Wilber's Integral Psychology offers a way of understanding religious traditions while allowing that there are different levels of understanding. One can be describing a tradition in a mythical manner with descriptions of deities and magical forces. Then again one can describe the same thing