--- shempmcgurk wrote:
--- Patrick wrote:
--- shempmcgurk wrote:
--- Gillam wrote:
on 7/4/06 5:04 PM, MDixon6569@ wrote:
on 7/4/06 12:38 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
And Thomas Friedman's point is well taken
as well: he says that Bush should do with
In a message dated 7/5/06 8:46:30 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I
didn't think I was assigning blame so much as giving a reason why Clinton
wasn't able to snap his fingers and launch a new energy program, as
someone implied above. But as for giving
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
So, tell me: for every hour you waste trying to convince ME that
global warming is occuring (and you just KNOW that I'm not going to
budge from my position!), you could be spending that time out on
the
streets
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: new.morning economics and morality
When I think about global warming, Im reminded of how thin and fragile the atmosphere is. If you were to go straight up the same distance you can drive your car in 5 minutes, youd be at about the height of Mt. Everest, and youd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I think about global warming, I¹m reminded of how thin and fragile the
atmosphere is. If you were to go straight up the same distance you can drive
your car in 5 minutes, you¹d be at about the height of Mt.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I think about global warming, I¹m reminded of how
thin and fragile the atmosphere is. If you were to go
straight up the same distance you can drive your car in
5 minutes, you¹d be at about the height of Mt.
On Jul 4, 2006, at 8:26 AM, Rick Archer wrote:When I think about global warming, I’m reminded of how thin and fragile the atmosphere is. If you were to go straight up the same distance you can drive your car in 5 minutes, you’d be at about the height of Mt. Everest, and you’d die in minutes. The
In a message dated 7/4/06 8:57:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps
some of the warming would have happened as part of the natural cycle of
things. But science seems to have shown that we are a contributor.
Regardless of what is the primary cause, we
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
snip
So, tell me: for every hour you waste trying to convince ME that
global warming is occuring (and you just KNOW that I'm not going
to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
snip
So, tell me: for every hour you waste trying to convince ME
that
TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I think about global warming, I¹m reminded of how
thin and fragile the atmosphere is. If you were to go
straight up the same distance you can drive your car in
5 minutes, you¹d be at about the
In a message dated 7/4/06 11:56:44 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
still think we ought to all chip in and send Shemp on a pilgrimage to
Mumbai so he can bask in the stench of the world's most polluted city.
:)
I wouldn't wish that experience on anybody
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
When I think about global warming, I¹m reminded of how thin and
fragile the
atmosphere is. If you were to go straight up the same distance
you can
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/4/06 8:57:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps some of the warming would have happened as part of the
natural cycle of things. But science seems to have shown that we
are
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: new.morning economics and morality
on 7/4/06 12:38 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And Thomas Friedman's point is well taken as well: he says that Bush
should do with energy what Kennedy did in '63 with the space program
(you know: send a man
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Sadly, your last few lines are correct: when we do find
alternatives, their use will bring down the price of oil (of which
there is about 600 years at current consumption rates left at known
reserves) and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
snip
Sadly, your last few lines are correct: when we do find
alternatives, their use will bring down the price of oil (of
which
there is
In a message dated 7/4/06 1:57:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on
7/4/06 12:38 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And Thomas Friedman's point is well taken as
well: he says that Bush should do with energy what Kennedy did in '63
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: new.morning economics and morality
on 7/4/06 5:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/4/06 1:57:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on 7/4/06 12:38 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And Thomas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
There's no oil crisis, just an intelligence crisis.
We agree on that point, at least.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email.
In a message dated 7/4/06 2:41:00 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When it
becomes clear that production has peaked and is on an irreversible
downhill slope, when people wake up to the fact that each year the world's
going to produce less oil than it did the
on 7/4/06 5:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 7/4/06 12:38 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
And Thomas Friedman's point is well taken as well: he says that Bush
should do with energy what Kennedy did in '63 with the space program
(you know: send a man to the moon and bring him safely back
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 7/4/06 5:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/4/06 1:57:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on 7/4/06 12:38 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 7/4/06 5:04 PM, MDixon6569@ wrote:
on 7/4/06 12:38 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
And Thomas Friedman's point is well taken as well: he says
that Bush
should do with energy what Kennedy did in '63 with
In a message dated 7/4/06 5:51:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 7/4/06 5:04 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED].. at [EMAIL PROTECTED].. wrote: In a
message dated 7/4/06 1:57:42 P.M.
In a message dated 7/4/06 5:48:57 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on
7/4/06 5:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED].. wrote: on 7/4/06
12:38 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:And
Thomas Friedman's point is well taken as well: he says that Bush
should do with energy what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/4/06 2:41:00 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When it becomes clear that production has peaked and is on an
irreversible downhill slope, when people wake up to the fact that
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: new.morning economics and morality
on 7/4/06 5:50 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 7/4/06 5:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
However, even assuming that you are correct that what we write and
debate here is valuable in that it informs those that have
been taken in as you describe it, do you really think it is a
good use of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 7/4/06 5:50 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%
40yahoogroups.com
, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
on 7/4/06 5:04 PM, MDixon6569@ at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 7/4/06 5:50 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%
40yahoogroups.com
, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
on 7/4/06 5:04 PM, MDixon6569@ at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
snip
Sadly, your last few lines are correct: when we do find
alternatives, their use will bring down the price of oil (of
which
there is
--- shempmcgurk wrote:
--- Gillam wrote:
on 7/4/06 5:04 PM, MDixon6569@ wrote:
on 7/4/06 12:38 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
And Thomas Friedman's point is well taken
as well: he says that Bush should do with
energy what Kennedy did in '63 with the
space program
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- shempmcgurk wrote:
--- Gillam wrote:
on 7/4/06 5:04 PM, MDixon6569@ wrote:
on 7/4/06 12:38 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
And Thomas Friedman's point is well taken
as well: he says
34 matches
Mail list logo
