http://georginealsbury.blogomatic.net/2007/03/03/download-music-free-from-ipod/
-
Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
[...]
my take on the foundation for much of the TM and MMY bashing is
that
Peter writes:
Intent is subtle effort. Intent is present in TM.
There is nothing wrong with effort when it is
understood this way. But you don't use the term
effort with people first starting TM because for
them the term effort means something completely
different. The intellect discriminates
A quote from Jean Klein from his book I AM page 85.
In an experience there is still an experiencer who is stuck in the
pattern of going in and out of states. Global understanding is the
sudden awareness that the perceiver of these states is unaffected by
them, that they appear in the perceiver.
If you have an opportunity, please listen to Maharishi's
speech on Bevan's BDC! His voice sounds better than
for quite a long time, IMO. His priestly accent is interesting.
For instance, he pronounced functioning approx. like
functionig. Cool! :)
This could be #1 in a Effort in Meditation FAQ.
On Mar 3, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Peter wrote:
Intent is subtle effort. Intent is present in TM.
There is nothing wrong with effort when it is
understood this way. But you don't use the term
effort with people first starting TM because for
them the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This could be #1 in a Effort in Meditation FAQ.
On Mar 3, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Peter wrote:
Intent is subtle effort. Intent is present in TM.
Except, one need not have intent to do TM.
On Mar 4, 2007, at 8:45 AM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This could be #1 in a Effort in Meditation FAQ.
On Mar 3, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Peter wrote:
Intent is subtle effort. Intent is present in TM.
Except, one need not have intent to do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 8:45 AM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
This could be #1 in a Effort in Meditation FAQ.
On Mar 3, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Peter wrote:
Intent is subtle
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This could be #1 in a Effort in Meditation FAQ.
Except that it isn't at all clear that TM even
involves *intent*. Charlie Donahue, for one (per my
quote in a recent post in response to Peter, which
of course Peter will not deign
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 8:45 AM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
This could be #1 in a Effort in Meditation FAQ.
On Mar 3, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Peter wrote:
Intent is subtle
http://snipurl.com/1bzh5-NZLZG6
4.2 meg PDF with text embedded.
On Mar 4, 2007, at 9:02 AM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 8:45 AM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
This could be #1 in a Effort in Meditation FAQ.
On Mar 3, 2007, at 7:54
Alternative download site:
http://snipurl.com/1b8o1
On Mar 4, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Vaj wrote:
http://snipurl.com/1bzh5-NZLZG6
4.2 meg PDF with text embedded.
Vaj wrote:
This could be #1 in a Effort in Meditation FAQ.
Vaj - Striving and effort presents an obstacle in TM, Tibetan Dzogchen
and the practice of Soto Zen. In fact, striving is counterproductive.
According to the Buddha himself, enlightenment cannot be achieved by
striving. Here's a quote
Intent is subtle effort. Intent is present in TM.
sparaig wrote:
Except, one need not have intent to do TM.
Intent, effort, goal- setting, they're all contrindicated in the
practice of dhyana. You are going to get only as much enlightenment as
you are going to get. All you have to do is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 9:02 AM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 8:45 AM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Because this forum is sometimes the home of questions
about or criticisms of TM, the TM organization, and/or
its founder Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, this is the first
of what may become a continuing series. In the series
I hope to dispel any misconceptions about TM and its
adherents by removing the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 9:02 AM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 8:45 AM,
In other words, if Vaj is here agreeing with Peter
that it's just a matter of not using a term that would
confuse neophyte TMers, why did Vaj call it a
falsehood and a false belief that TMers try to
push as if it were some kind of deliberate deception?
Why ? Because either Vaj has an
On Mar 4, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Vaj - Striving and effort presents an obstacle in TM, Tibetan Dzogchen
and the practice of Soto Zen. In fact, striving is counterproductive.
According to the Buddha himself, enlightenment cannot be achieved by
striving. Here's a quote from
Vaj wrote:
Any meditation using an OBECT will require subtle intent.
Oh, so now it's subtle effort required in Buddhist sadhana?
According to Swami Lakamanjoo, the last living guru of Kashmere
Tantra, all you need to do to begin meditiating is feel the body as a
whole. It's that simple, Vaj.
On Mar 4, 2007, at 10:33 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Whatever you do, don't play any of these MP3s
[one MP3 of a Leonard Cohen song, sent by a TM
critic] - they contain subliminal Illuminati
brainwashing messages.
Yeah, go figure, it was only a simply tracking device hidden in an
MP3.
On Mar 4, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Vaj wrote:
Any meditation using an OBECT will require subtle intent.
Oh, so now it's subtle effort required in Buddhist sadhana?
According to Swami Lakamanjoo, the last living guru of Kashmere
Tantra, all you need to do to begin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Because this forum is sometimes the home of questions
about or criticisms of TM, the TM organization, and/or
its founder Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, this is the first
of what may become a continuing series. In the series
Vaj wrote:
Any meditation using an OBECT will require subtle intent.
(Effort in Meditation FAQ #2?)
sparaig wrote:
Heh. You simply don't get it.
Too much striving!
On Mar 4, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Vaj wrote:
Any meditation using an OBECT will require subtle intent.
(Effort in Meditation FAQ #2?)
sparaig wrote:
Heh. You simply don't get it.
Too much striving!
If I have no object, what exactly is it that I'm striving for?
Vaj wrote:
Either that or find a Patanjali master who'd be willing
to explain it to you ! ;-)
You are supposed to read the book BEFORE you make your comments.
Maharishi Patanjali says: When thought ceases, the Transcendental
Absolute stands by itself, refers to Itself, as a witness to the
Some refinements, curious if you agree or not (Peter S.):
On Mar 3, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Peter wrote:
Intent is subtle effort. Intent is present in TM.
There is nothing wrong with effort when it is
understood this way. But you don't use the term
effort with people first starting TM because for
According to Swami Lakamanjoo, the last living guru of Kashmere
Tantra, all you need to do to begin meditiating is feel the body
as a whole. It's that simple, Vaj. Just stop your striving!
Vaj wrote:
Feeling an object of sensation is still meditation on an object.
It's a contemplative
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of at_man_and_brahman
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 12:46 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Sthapatya Vedic Trailer
It's at MERU, and is plainly visible (including kalash)
from orbit in Google
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are supposed to read the book BEFORE you make your comments.
Maharishi Patanjali says: When thought ceases, the Transcendental
Absolute stands by itself, refers to Itself, as a witness to the
world - 'tada
Vaj wrote:
I made no comments on Dzogchen,
So you're saying that Dzogchen isn't Buddhist Sadhana.
we were discussing Lawson's TM dogmas of effort vs.
effortlessness. Sogyal Rinpoche does state it nicely.
It's not a TM dogma - Suzuki, Sogyal, and Laksmanjoo agree that
striving and effort is
nablusos108 wrote:
Why do you bother Richard?
Some people just feel better when they have someone to talk to.
nablusos108 wrote:
Why not just let it Be and move on.
Because the comings and goings of the Maharishi is an obsession?
sparaig wrote:
But everyone knows that Gurudev died in 1953,
while your Brittanica quote says he died in 1952.
Maybe so, but the Britannica confirms that Mahesh worked for a time in
factories, that's the point.
Typo, or Illuminatti conspiracy?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because this forum is sometimes the home of questions
about or criticisms of TM, the TM organization, and/or
its founder Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, this is the first
of what may become a continuing series.
In this
A casual lurker might think that Turquoise would be wary of meditation.
Which form of meditation, Turquoise? TM ?
(From Turquoise, A Ducky Morning in France, FFL 131898, Feb. 27, 2007)
I woke up without an alarm and meditated, then made
some coffee and wandered out to the terrace overlooking
51deg09'23.71 N 6deg09'17.42 E
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of at_man_and_brahman
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 12:46 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Because this forum is sometimes the home of questions
about or criticisms of TM, the TM organization, and/or
its founder Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, this
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nablusos108 wrote:
Why not just let it Be and move on.
Because the comings and goings of the Maharishi is an obsession?
Probably. All Saints will get unwanted focus. Not that they care.
What is sad is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
Because this forum is sometimes the home of questions
about or criticisms of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://snipurl.com/1bzh5-NZLZG6
4.2 meg PDF with text embedded.
Er, thanks Vaj. Now people can download it from your site, instead of from the
original url,
which I posted on the various newsgroups a week or so ago. I'm
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 9:02 AM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 8:45 AM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Because this forum is sometimes the home of questions
about or criticisms of TM, the TM organization, and/or
its founder Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, this
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Vaj - Striving and effort presents an obstacle in TM, Tibetan Dzogchen
and the practice of Soto Zen. In fact, striving is counterproductive.
According to the Buddha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Vaj wrote:
Any meditation using an OBECT will require subtle intent.
(Effort in Meditation FAQ #2?)
sparaig wrote:
Heh. You simply don't get it.
Too
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Intent is subtle effort. Intent is present in TM.
sparaig wrote:
Except, one need not have intent to do TM.
Intent, effort, goal- setting, they're all contrindicated in the
practice of dhyana. You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Vaj wrote:
Any meditation using an OBECT will require subtle intent.
Oh, so now it's subtle effort required in Buddhist sadhana?
According to Swami
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of at_man_and_brahman
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 12:46 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Sthapatya Vedic
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
sparaig wrote:
But everyone knows that Gurudev died in 1953,
while your Brittanica quote says he died in 1952.
Maybe so, but the Britannica confirms that Mahesh worked for a time in
factories, that's
sparaig wrote:
What, pray tell, is NOT an object?
The Absolute, the Transcendent, is not an object of cognition. All
meditation requires is the will to begin. An object, such as a sound
used in sadhana, simply provides the opportunity for the transcending
- the object is not the goal or the real
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
willytex@ wrote:
sparaig wrote:
But everyone knows that Gurudev died in 1953,
while your Brittanica quote says he died in 1952.
Maybe so, but the
Meditation does not unfold the Self - the Self unfolds Itself,
by Itself, to Itself. - MMY 1967, CBG VI, 5, P. 293
sparaig wrote:
And or by using any attractive object.
Or by the use of mantras in meditation or by the use of simples.
Psychic and spiritual powers (siddhi) may be inborn,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
willytex@ wrote:
nablusos108 wrote:
Why not just let it Be and move on.
Because the comings and goings of the Maharishi is an obsession?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Vaj wrote:
Any meditation using an OBECT will require subtle intent.
Oh, so now it's
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of cardemaister
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 5:52 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Bevan's Birth Day Celebration!
If you have an opportunity, please listen to Maharishi's
speech on Bevan's
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 7:46 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Effort required in Buddhist Sadhana.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 7:46 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Effort required in Buddhist
I stand by my title for the other thread. It
doesn't imply that it's ALL things that TMers
believe, does it?
Non sequitur. Read what I wrote again, please.
Speaking of non sequiturs and thread titles, it looks like you and Jim
are once again changing the subject line of threads.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 7:46 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Effort required in Buddhist
sparaig wrote:
Does this mean that I'm doing TM wrong?
Transcending is an automatic process; it doesn't require any effort or
striving because there is no goal, no destination. You are already in
the enlightened state; your mind is just covered over with the
appearance of the material world -
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 7:46 AM
To:
authfriend wrote:
That scripture quote is meaningless without context,
Rick, as I've pointed out before.
And as I recently posted, Charlie Donahue is quoted
as saying TM doesn't even involve *intent* (which is
my experience, and obviously Lawson's as well).
There's some kind of subtle
On Mar 4, 2007, at 2:56 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 7:46 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Effort required in Buddhist Sadhana.
--- In
On Mar 4, 2007, at 1:48 PM, sparaig wrote:
Er, thanks Vaj. Now people can download it from your site, instead
of from the original url,
which I posted on the various newsgroups a week or so ago. I'm
trying to get him to
upload his Is Consciousness the Unified Field? article as well:
sparaig wrote:
I suspect that MMY's point was that at most some subtle
effort MIGHT be involved, especially at the start.
At most all it takes is the will to live. The fruits of meditation are
not the result of effort or concentration. According to Bhagavad Gita,
clinging to fruits of one's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sparaig wrote:
Does this mean that I'm doing TM wrong?
Transcending is an automatic process; it doesn't require any effort or
striving because there is no goal, no destination. You are already in
the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sparaig wrote:
Does this mean that I'm doing TM wrong?
Transcending is an automatic process; it doesn't require any effort or
striving because there is no goal, no destination. You are already in
the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 2:56 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 7:46 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 1:48 PM, sparaig wrote:
Er, thanks Vaj. Now people can download it from your site, instead
of from the original url,
which I posted on the various newsgroups a week or so ago. I'm
trying to get
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 2:56 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 7:46 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
On Mar 4, 2007, at 3:30 PM, sparaig wrote:
It's well known, save to those of us who were content to keep to
our original practice,
rather than seek something better.
And then there are those of us who never abandoned our practice at
all, but integrated it with more advanced or more
Transcending is an automatic process; it doesn't require
any effort or striving because there is no goal, no
destination. You are already in the enlightened state;
your mind is just covered over with the appearance of
the material world - Maya. All you have to do is isolate
the
On Mar 4, 2007, at 3:32 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 1:48 PM, sparaig wrote:
Er, thanks Vaj. Now people can download it from your site, instead
of from the original url,
which I posted on the various newsgroups a
On Mar 4, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Maybe so, but both Barry and Vaj seem to be believers in the
enlightenment tradition, except they got a little mixed up when they
adopted Buddhism, not realizing that the practice advocated by Mahesh
IS pure Buddhist Yoga.
Actually that
Vaj wrote:
The Beatles Biggest Secrets
On BBC America 3/3/07 10:00 PM
http://www.bbcamerica.com/content/200/index.jsp
It was okay but not that much to it. You won't see much of Maharishi,
just some of Paul Saltzman's photos from Rishikesh.
Robert Gimbel wrote:
I'm sure in India, when Maharishi was with Guru Dev, there
were some powerful ceremonies, and powerful being which
would help to dispel any deep rooted lower energies.
From what I've read, Robert, being in the same room with Guru Dev was a
meditation in itself, where
-edged sword of both
YouTube and on proudly displaying in public
things that might better be kept to oneself:
http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.html?uc_full_date=20070304
As long as you're looking at comics check out today's Bizarro if you can
somehow. Unfortunately
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 2:02 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Effort required in Buddhist Sadhana.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 2:09 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Effort required in Buddhist Sadhana.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My OCR packages all take PDF's as input docs.
Neat. Which packages are these?
I do this to all the PDF bitmapped documents
I get now. You can search for words then. A lot
of people are doing entire series of books,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 3:30 PM, sparaig wrote:
It's well known, save to those of us who were content to keep to
our original practice,
rather than seek something better.
And then there are those of us who never
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 2:02 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Effort required in Buddhist
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 2:09 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Effort required in Buddhist
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 2:09 PM
To:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
Judy:
That scripture quote is meaningless without context,
Rick, as I've pointed out before.
Rick:
I don't recall that he provided a
On Mar 4, 2007, at 4:09 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
Gentle means gentle. Just the intention to entertain the mantra is
a gentle effort, as compared with just sitting there letting random
thoughts run amok
Intent to sit, intent to close eyes (and remove them from their open
state), intention
On Mar 4, 2007, at 4:18 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My OCR packages all take PDF's as input docs.
Neat. Which packages are these?
I have Adobe Acrobat Professional, ReadIris Pro and OmniPage Pro.
Omnipage for Windows is the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 4:09 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
Gentle means gentle. Just the intention to entertain
the mantra is a gentle effort, as compared with just
sitting there letting random thoughts run amok
Intent to sit,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 4:09 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
Gentle means gentle. Just the intention to entertain
the mantra is a gentle effort, as compared
On Mar 4, 2007, at 3:47 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
Vaj wrote:
The Beatles Biggest Secrets
On BBC America 3/3/07 10:00 PM
http://www.bbcamerica.com/content/200/index.jsp
It was okay but not that much to it. You won't see much of Maharishi,
just some of Paul Saltzman's photos from Rishikesh.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of at_man_and_brahman
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 12:46 AM
To:
I don't know about the lecture Rick refers to and the context of the
quote, but I have many times seen one of the Humbolt tapes where
Maharishi was asked about this. I paraphrase, but it's pretty close.
The questioner asked--We are told to think the mantra as effortlessly
as we think any other
According to that reasoning there are plenty of celestial beings around who
could enlighten us right now. Why don't they? Maybe we don't deserve it.
Meditation is a starting point - nothing more; but if it keeps our energies up,
it makes alot of sense to keep it up..., etc.
Richard J.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 2:02 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Effort required in Buddhist
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 2:09 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Effort required in Buddhist
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
