--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
wrote:
>
> On May 26, 2011, at 9:45 PM, seventhray1 wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
> > What part of "drooling TB" don't you understand?
> >
> Thank goodness for good 'ol name calling. Far better than usin
On May 26, 2011, at 9:45 PM, seventhray1 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> What part of "drooling TB" don't you understand?
>
Thank goodness for good 'ol name calling. Far better than using credible
sources to make your point.
Right~~"credible sources" on a man who die
Looks like a Yahoo burp.
On 05/26/2011 07:19 PM, Alex Stanley wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, FFL PostCount wrote:
>> Fairfield Life Post Counter
>> ===
> Manual count for some of you:
>
>> 60 Yifu
> 48 that includes the one post made after the Post Count
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" wrote:
> Go to post #48039 for the Mahapatra info
Not a very flattering account.
Some Nath-s and most Aghori-s claim their vibhuti is left over from
charnel fires but that is just b.s. Charnel "ashes" come from
the wood used as combustion for burning. The bodies themselves do not
produce ashes.
Since I had my wife's body cremated and have examined the residues
(burned at 17o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "richardnelson108"
wrote:
> Now can someone tell me what the reference to Mahapatra is about?
> He is someone I have spent some time with, so I would like to know
what he "supposedly" said according to the Vaj man. Then I can weigh in
on what he directly tol
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> What part of "drooling TB" don't you understand?
>
Thank goodness for good 'ol name calling. Far better than using
credible sources to make your point.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> Read: Vaj has corrected the historical record and placed Mahesh in his
proper context: a crook and a molester of women. and whatever else may
suit Vaj's fancy at the moment.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, FFL PostCount wrote:
>
> Fairfield Life Post Counter
> ===
Manual count for some of you:
> 60 Yifu
48 that includes the one post made after the Post Count
> 57 turquoiseb
47
> 52 whynotnow7
46
> 49 WillyTex
41
Thanks for giving me the post # on mahapatra.
I can't really comment on it much.
Some of it (about MMY's health) does match with what he told me.
I can only say that he had only positive things to say about MMY, how much he
loved him and how much teaching TM meant to him. He was clearly moved by
Same advice to you: read the posts rather than attempting another pitiful
smear.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On May 26, 2011, at 8:50 AM, feste37 wrote:
>
> > Have you even read the posts by Richard you quote here? He presents a very
> > strong case against all th
Redding, Ca: ("Angel feathers" for example)
http://www.redding.com/news/2010/jan/19/bethels-signs-and-wonders-include-angel-feathers/
On May 26, 2011, at 7:34 PM, richardnelson108 wrote:
> I am NOT a TB. And I have read Judith's book.
> TM works for me and I value what is has given me. Thats all.
> And what you don't seem to ever want to admit is that TM and MMY may have
> some value for some people.
Well one unfortunate
On May 26, 2011, at 7:40 PM, wayback71 wrote:
> I guess it depends on how you define "TB." In my version, a TB would never
> ever go attempt to find out more about the rumors of the murder of Guru Dev.
> TB's refuse to think about such info for more than a few seconds before
> relegating the
Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): Sat May 21 00:00:00 2011
End Date (UTC): Sat May 28 00:00:00 2011
738 messages as of (UTC) Thu May 26 23:55:02 2011
63 authfriend
60 Yifu
57 turquoiseb
52 whynotnow7
49 WillyTex
43 tartbrain
37 Buck
34 seventhray1
34
Are all Buddhists attention whores, or just you?:-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On May 26, 2011, at 8:32 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
>
> > As I understand it Richard Nelson's sources were first hand sources who
> > acutally were in a position to know some of the details w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "richardnelson108"
wrote:
>
> Hey Vaj,
> I am NOT a TB. And I have read Judith's book.
> TM works for me and I value what is has given me. Thats all.
> And what you don't seem to ever want to admit is that TM and MMY may have
> some value for some peop
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "richardnelson108"
wrote:
>
> Hey Vaj,
> I am NOT a TB. And I have read Judith's book.
> TM works for me and I value what is has given me. Thats all.
> And what you don't seem to ever want to admit is that TM and MMY may have
> some value for some peop
On May 26, 2011, at 7:19 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" wrote:
>>
>> Pile on? Vaj has simply been exposed as a liar. Not sure
>> what standard you look for in evaluating statements. But
>> Vaj made a series of assertions and all of them turned
>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On May 26, 2011, at 8:32 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
>
> > As I understand it Richard Nelson's sources were first hand sources who
> > acutally were in a position to know some of the details which were alleged
> > to have taken place. Richar
Hey Vaj,
I am NOT a TB. And I have read Judith's book.
TM works for me and I value what is has given me. Thats all.
And what you don't seem to ever want to admit is that TM and MMY may have some
value for some people. It seems like that possibility does not exist for you.
One does not have
On May 26, 2011, at 8:50 AM, feste37 wrote:
> Have you even read the posts by Richard you quote here? He presents a very
> strong case against all the accusations made by Vaj. Read it. All you do is
> try to smear him as "unstable," which is plainly not the case.
What part of "drooling TB"
On May 26, 2011, at 8:32 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
> As I understand it Richard Nelson's sources were first hand sources who
> acutally were in a position to know some of the details which were alleged to
> have taken place. Richard says he spoke directly with the lawyer who handled
> SBS's will
On May 26, 2011, at 8:01 AM, Sal Sunshine wrote:
> That's what it seems to me as well~~
> if there were some posts made which
> in any way proved Vaj's assertions to
> be false, or even dealt with them on
> any kind of level other than pseudo-
> hysteria, I haven't seen them. Perhaps
> lurk coul
On May 26, 2011, at 7:00 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
> Pile on? Vaj has simply been exposed as a liar. Not sure what standard you
> look for in evaluating statements. But Vaj made a series of assertions and
> all of them turned out to be false. When asked to back up these assertions,
> the best
On May 25, 2011, at 10:04 PM, emptybill wrote:
> I'm selling the idea as a genuine return to an "old world charm" for imported
> nath-yogis, which V claims to be.
>
A real "old world charm" a la the Nathas would be ashes.
Well here is the corpus. One can draw whatever conclusons one wants.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "richardnelson108"
wrote:
>
> You are right. I did not give a name. Unfortuneatly, I do not remember
it. It was in Allahabad at the Kumbha Mela in 1995.
>
> And regarding everyone wanting
On May 26, 2011, at 3:18 PM, turquoiseb wrote:
> Steve, I give up.
Same here. I think i'm discussing one thing...
and then it turns out I'm doing this, requiring
that, etc. It seems like I'm always trying to
pull some kind of rabbit out of a hat, according
to Steve. Apparently having a differe
You are right. I did not give a name. Unfortuneatly, I do not remember it.
It was in Allahabad at the Kumbha Mela in 1995.
And regarding everyone wanting to "sweep this under the rug", that is possible,
however doubtful as the various people I spoke to are not all connected. For
example, th
Turquoiseb:
> The "reality of FFL" is that since the beginning of
> this posting week, five posters (Judy, Jim, Willytex,
> Nabby, and Ravi) have made 62 posts either insulting
> me, trying to "refute" something I said, or otherwise
> putting me down...
>
"In 1989, Rama justified to the disci
Sal, I honestly don't see the value in mental masturbation (or the other kind)
that you, Bozotronic Barry and Vaj do. Different strokes for different folks I
guess.:-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
>
>
> On May 26, 2011, at 2:53 PM, whynotnow7 wrote:
>
> > I agree
On May 26, 2011, at 2:53 PM, whynotnow7 wrote:
> I agree completely. It is pretty obvious that Vaj, Bozotronic Barry and Sal
> are trying their best to enforce a double standard here.
Yes we are Jim...and if it weren't for your razor-sharp
mind, we'd have gotten away with it.
> Anytime anyone
On May 26, 2011, at 3:02 PM, seventhray1 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
> It's also India, where people will say
> anything rather than deal with
> unpleasantness. Sounds like
> you feel for it hook, line and
> stinker. And now you feel
> people should accord
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" wrote:
>
> All fine except the person Richard Nelson is referencing was
> connected to SBS, not Maharishi. So where's the motive to put
> a positive spin on it especially when according to Vaj, those
> closest to SBS absolutely despised MMY?
All fine except the person Richard Nelson is referencing was connected
to SBS, not Maharishi. So where's the motive to put a positive spin on
it especially when according to Vaj, those closest to SBS absolutely
despised MMY? But I guess you can arrange facts in any way you want.
This person lie
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
wrote:
> It's also India, where people will say
> anything rather than deal with
> unpleasantness. Sounds like
> you feel for it hook, line and
> stinker. And now you feel
> people should accord your words
> magic powers and not question
> anythi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
>
> On May 26, 2011, at 1:04 PM, richardnelson108 wrote:
>
> > To clarify, I met with the Supreme Court of Allahabad retired
> > judge who handled Guru Dev's will (not a lawyer). And yes, he
> > was alive and kicking and quite brilliant.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> I, at least, understand the difference between a "source"
> and a "claim of a source." You clearly do not.
>
I don't know what burden of proof you are looking for. Evidently it's
pretty high. But I think in most instances we don't get t
I agree completely. It is pretty obvious that Vaj, Bozotronic Barry and Sal are
trying their best to enforce a double standard here. Anytime anyone says
something positive about TM or Maharishi, they need a brief worthy of Supreme
Court scrutiny in order to be believed by the naysayers. However,
Sal
On May 26, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote:
> take offense when Vaj repeatedly makes reference to something that never
> appears to have happened to make his opinion right.
> As I have also said, if he or anyone else has issues with MMY, thats fine
> with me. But if he is going to q
On May 26, 2011, at 1:04 PM, richardnelson108 wrote:
> To clarify, I met with the Supreme Court of Allahabad retired judge who
> handled Guru Dev's will (not a lawyer). And yes, he was alive and kicking and
> quite brilliant. And, oh yes, he remembered all the details quite clearly.
> This was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "richardnelson108"
wrote:
> As I have also said, if he or anyone else has issues with MMY, thats
fine with me. But if he is going to quote supposed events to make his
point, then use real events, not something he made up.
I am just trying to figure out what c
Ha-Ha! Why do you think the initials of the Cannabis Cup are "CC"?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> On 05/26/2011 10:23 AM, Ravi Yogi wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >> On 05/26/2011 09:07 AM, Ravi Yogi wrote:
> >>> ---
On 05/26/2011 10:23 AM, Ravi Yogi wrote:
>
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>> On 05/26/2011 09:07 AM, Ravi Yogi wrote:
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
Funny stuff, Tart. I particularly liked "Are they all
ex postal employees?" b
I just enjoy tossing your insults right back at 'cha, Bozotronic Barry. I guess
you enjoy being insulted. Karma's a bitch. :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote:
> >
> > In reality there is no truth.
> >
> > Ther
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Yogi" wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Yogi" raviyogi@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Turq, I don't know why you continue lumping me with others.
> > > You know how mu
To clarify, I met with the Supreme Court of Allahabad retired judge who handled
Guru Dev's will (not a lawyer). And yes, he was alive and kicking and quite
brilliant. And, oh yes, he remembered all the details quite clearly. This was
in 1995.
The point I was trying to make, and I will repeat
Three guesses who this is: "I read your posts Jim", "I never read your posts
Jim!!", "I read your posts Jim", "I never read your posts Jim!!", "I read your
posts Jim", "I never read your posts Jim!!", "I read your posts Jim", "I never
read your posts Jim!!", "I read your posts Jim", "I never rea
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Yogi" raviyogi@ wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill"
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In reality there is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Yogi" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote:
> > >
> > > In reality there is no truth.
> > >
> > > There is no truth in reality.
> > > There is no reality tha
They have replied to you so they could respond to your previous
postings.
This encourages you but also gives the false impression that people
really care about what you say.
Those people your quote on FFL believe that your statements need
countering but in the world of "no truth, no reality" wha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> On 05/26/2011 09:07 AM, Ravi Yogi wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> >>
> >> Funny stuff, Tart. I particularly liked "Are they all
> >> ex postal employees?" because the most rational and
> >> restrai
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote:
> >
> > In reality there is no truth.
> >
> > There is no truth in reality.
> > There is no reality that can be true.
> > There is only opinion.
> >
> > All opinions are equal
On 05/25/2011 12:26 AM, Ravi Yogi wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>> Inspired by David Eagleman's "Sum," I thought I'd spend some time
>> pondering what the Afterlife will be like for each of us here at
>> Fairfield Life. This is just for fun, and written off the t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote:
>
> In reality there is no truth.
>
> There is no truth in reality.
> There is no reality that can be true.
> There is only opinion.
>
> All opinions are equal in value.
> You are a troll. Vaj is a troll.
>
> You support each other in tro
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I am think of starting a skype interview site like Rick "Bat Shit
Crazy" interviewing TMers and those of related paths.
>
> Q: "So from your bio, it looks like when you were younger you were
pretty normal"
>
> A: "Yes, I was petty n
On 05/26/2011 09:07 AM, Ravi Yogi wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>>
>> Funny stuff, Tart. I particularly liked "Are they all
>> ex postal employees?" because the most rational and
>> restrained person on the forum these days *is* an ex
>> US Postal Service employe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
wrote:
>
> You've been harping on this one for years lurk..
> it evidently got to you. So sure, go ahead
> and bring up the claim and show me how
> "wrong" I was.
Sal, Sorry I'm not biting. It did not "get" to me. But I am not going
to waste m
I'm going to channel my inner Judy now..a poor imitation of her but I
will try..
Look how Turqster, the trickster spins his deception.
Now he says it's all opinion, both Vaj and Richardson are stating
opinions and he doesn't side with either of them when he clearly sides
with the liar Vaj, one tric
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
>
> Funny stuff, Tart. I particularly liked "Are they all
> ex postal employees?" because the most rational and
> restrained person on the forum these days *is* an ex
> US Postal Service employee. :-)
>
> We never hear from lurkers. Duh.
You've been harping on this one for years lurk..
it evidently got to you. So sure, go ahead
and bring up the claim and show me how
"wrong" I was.
Sal
On May 26, 2011, at 10:25 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
Sal, if you wish me to bring up an instance where you called me a gulliable
fool, or idiot for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_reply@ wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Following is an interesting post to SeriousSeekers.com
> >
> > "Fellow Graceful, Light Filled Seekers,
> >
> > I think I may have found IT -- the faste
In reality there is no truth.
There is no truth in reality.
There is no reality that can be true.
There is only opinion.
All opinions are equal in value.
You are a troll. Vaj is a troll.
You support each other in trollness.
You opinions don't matter here.
Your opinions don't matter at all.
N
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Yogi" wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_reply@ wrote:
>
> >
> > Some reply comments to this post at SeriousSeekeers.com
> >
> > #1 "I checked out FFL as you suggested. Wow, I never knew what
Ekhart
> Tolle meant by "pain bo
On May 26, 2011, at 10:16 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
Sal, It seems to me that our whole legal system is based on trying to arrive at
the truth.
It is, but this is just a discussion.
So, whether it is a legal issue or a philosophical issue, I feel like I would
like to arrive at what might be call
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain wrote:
> > >
> > > Following is an interesting post to SeriousSeekers.com
> > >
> > > "Fellow Graceful, Light Filled Seeker
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
wrote:
>
> On May 26, 2011, at 7:41 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
>
> Sal, I will be glad to do this. But I will have to do it this evening
when I have some time and if someone doesn't do it before then. The
question will then be, are YOU willing to lo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" steve.sundur@
> wrote:
> > >
> > > As I understand it Richard Nelson's sources were first hand
> > > sources who acuta
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" steve.sundur@
wrote:
> >
> >
> > Pile on? Vaj has simply been exposed as a liar. Not sure what
standard
> > you look for in evaluating statements. But Vaj made a series of
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
wrote:
>
> On May 26, 2011, at 7:32 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
>
> As I understand it Richard Nelson's sources were first hand sources
who acutally were in a position to know some of the details which were
alleged to have taken place.
>
> Is that an
feste37:
> Vaj reminds me of the wacko political right
> who will say anything to put their Democratic
> enemies in a bad light...
>
Compared to the left-wing radicals on FFL, Vaj
seems to be pretty mainstream - he can't stand
people who take up for the Islamic terrorists.
Where I come from, s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" steve.sundur@
wrote:
> >
> > As I understand it Richard Nelson's sources were first hand
> > sources who acutally were in a position to know some of the
> > details which were alleged t
> > > Well, it looks like Obama wants to return
> > > to the 1949 border lines.
> > >
> authfriend:
> > No, it doesn't look like that at all.
> >
> yes, it looks like it - but the starting point
> for Hamas is that Israel does not exist, so that
> would make 1949 the starting point.
>
"The Gaza
> > Apparently President Obama's call for Israel to accept
> > a peace agreement based on the 1967 armistice lines is
> > not a new proposal - it's the same proposal presented
> > by Bill Clinton in 2000.
> >
authfriend"
> Again: NOBODY HAS SUGGESTED RETURNING TO THE 1967 BORDERS
> AS A SOL
Well if yet more unverifiable claims~~ie opinions~~
are what constitutes "a very strong case" in *your*
opinion, feste...I sure hope I never have you on my
side of the defense table, so to speak.
Sal
On May 26, 2011, at 7:50 AM, feste37 wrote:
Have you even read the posts by Richard you quote her
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain wrote:
> >
> > Following is an interesting post to SeriousSeekers.com
> >
> > "Fellow Graceful, Light Filled Seekers,
> >
> > I think I may have found IT -- the fastest evolutionary,
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> >If this is what TM produces in the way of intellect,
> I am not impressed. I doubt lurkers here are, either.
> ..
> > > Not only unverifiable claims, but almost hysterical
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
If the drop becomes the ocean, the drop is no more as a drop, it is
completely recycled and uniformly distributed in the ocean, if we take
the analogy a bit further. The specific individuality of the drop is
gone. Try and reass
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>If this is what TM produces in the way of intellect,
I am not impressed. I doubt lurkers here are, either.
..
> > Not only unverifiable claims, but almost hysterical
> > ones at that.
>
> Certainly angry ones, and out-of-control emotion
On May 26, 2011, at 7:41 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
Sal, I will be glad to do this. But I will have to do it this evening when I
have some time and if someone doesn't do it before then. The question will
then be, are YOU willing to look at the evidence in any kind of objective way,
or simply dism
On May 26, 2011, at 7:32 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
As I understand it Richard Nelson's sources were first hand sources who
acutally were in a position to know some of the details which were alleged to
have taken place.
Is that anything like Christian groups who
go to Israel and speak with people
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" wrote:
>
> As I understand it Richard Nelson's sources were first hand
> sources who acutally were in a position to know some of the
> details which were alleged to have taken place.
In other words, EXACTLY the same as Vaj's. His
opinion is
Have you even read the posts by Richard you quote here? He presents a very
strong case against all the accusations made by Vaj. Read it. All you do is try
to smear him as "unstable," which is plainly not the case.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
>
> Here are Richar
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
>
> On May 26, 2011, at 6:19 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" wrote:
> > >
> > > Pile on? Vaj has simply been exposed as a liar. Not sure
> > > what standard you look for in evaluating st
http://www.tm.org/blog/people/brahms/
Brahms "In tune with the Infinite"
by CRAIG PEARSON, PH.D. on MAY 10, 2011
Johannes Brahms
18331897 Germany
In his early teens, to support his family, Brahms earned money playing in dance
halls and inns around the docks in Hamburg the same area a
Sal, I will be glad to do this. But I will have to do it this evening
when I have some time and if someone doesn't do it before then. The
question will then be, are YOU willing to look at the evidence in any
kind of objective way, or simply dismiss it as just some subjective view
point?
I have
As I understand it Richard Nelson's sources were first hand sources who
acutally were in a position to know some of the details which were
alleged to have taken place. Richard says he spoke directly with the
lawyer who handled SBS's will, and traveled to some of various places at
issue and spoke
Wow - what a double standard, Sal! Barry puts out over two thousand pages of
insults on this forum per year. Vaj less so, but still an impressive number.
Richardnelson108 writes a few paragraphs and you are up in arms? Hypocrite.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
>
> Her
And I thought it is over- let this cup pass from me;...
All the sets for the film conveniently designed for adaptation to an
upcoming video game?Does it comes after a computer game add-on for
popular first-person shooter Counter Strike that was shared on the
internet this month to allow v
"Not only unverifiable claims, but almost hysterical ones at
that."
C'mon kiddies. I have been on this list for about 5 years. During that time Vaj
*(Steve F.) has slandered Maharishi continuously with not a shred of evidence,
presenting everything he says as above reproach. He has also slung pl
Here are Richard's "facts," Jim, or at least
all the ones I've seen lately~~perhaps you could post
the ones I've missed:
"Hi, Richard here. Since this was originally written to me, I thought I would
chime in.
I will take responsibility for adding my negative comments about Vaj where they
were
On May 26, 2011, at 6:19 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" wrote:
>>
>> Pile on? Vaj has simply been exposed as a liar. Not sure
>> what standard you look for in evaluating statements. But
>> Vaj made a series of assertions and all of them turned
>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" wrote:
>
>
> Pile on? Vaj has simply been exposed as a liar. Not sure what standard
> you look for in evaluating statements. But Vaj made a series of
> assertions and all of them turned out to be false. When asked to back
> up these assert
I guess what I want to say is that from my point of view in enlightenment
the question of what happens to the body(subtle/gross) becomes irrelevant b/c
the SELF no longer experiences itself as being bounded i.e having a
body.OTOH,after enlightenment, the SELF continues to have an experience
Comparing the facts of richardnelson108, based on actual events he witnessed
with Vaj's imaginings, and you call them equivalent? You recently said I had
the intellectual depth of a turnip. I'm sorry but I cannot even grant you that
much mental capacity. Your shriveled heart and blinding ego hav
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" wrote:
>
> Pile on? Vaj has simply been exposed as a liar. Not sure
> what standard you look for in evaluating statements. But
> Vaj made a series of assertions and all of them turned
> out to be false.
Not true. What actually happened is
Pile on? Vaj has simply been exposed as a liar. Not sure what standard
you look for in evaluating statements. But Vaj made a series of
assertions and all of them turned out to be false. When asked to back
up these assertions, the best he could come up with, was "he heard it
from someone"
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister wrote:
>
>
> http://normanrosenthal.com/blog/why-i-changed-my-mind-and-wrote-transcendence-healing-and-transformation-through-transcendental-meditation.html
>
> "Actually, it was for me a rediscovery, since I had first learned TM back in
> Sou
98 matches
Mail list logo
