I speak as someone new to FFL who mostly lurks. I sometimes feel to share in
a discussion but know that if I do, someone's sure to throw shit at me, and it
just isn't worth it. I think a lot of women feel that way. It's why few women
participate in this forum.
As far as
This is an interesting post. It reminds me of a question I've had a long time
that maybe some people out there can answer. It's about kundulini. What are you
supposed to do with it?
Sometimes in my life when I've done a lot of meditation, back in the days of
TM or later through other
Boy, I like that, Lurk. Enlightenment means you operate on a quantum level,
not a Newtonian level. That's beautiful.
Bronte
-
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story.
Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
Rick wrote:
These are all good points Judy and I agree with them. As you know, I have
been very reluctant to institute such a policy, for many of the reasons you
mention. I consider it to be an experiment, and Ill drop it if it doesnt
work. At t this point, my idea of personal attacks
Bronte wrote:
I agree with Edg on this one. Rick, if
you start to discriminate between blatant, abrasive personal
attacks and milder personal insults, you really do step into the
role of a judge. People are likely to get upset with you, comparing
their remark, which you ruled against,
Rick wrote:
Sometimes its hard for me to tell whats derogatory. When I first introduced
this topic, Bob Brigante said, Piss off, you idiot and I took that as humor.
Edg has a problem with Nabbys You need a checking. The obvious implication
is youre meditating incorrectly and
wrote:
People don't have to read posts. They are not like bullets that
intersect with your life without invitation. This analogy doesn't work
for me.
Bronte:
They are, though. In my own experience, I made a post a couple weeks ago and
got stuff back like bronte baxter -- the faggy guy
You said it very well. It sounds pretty darn enlightened.
Bronte
lurkernomore20002000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boy, I like that, Lurk. Enlightenment means you operate on a
quantum level
Hi, New Morning -
You're getting pretty deep here, fella. Interesting point about the holocaust
opinion. I see myself as pretty open-minded, a respecter of opinions not my
own. But I see red when somebody starts telling me they believe the holocaust
never happened. So I guess I do
I remember that joke the way my dad used to tell it. When the little optimist
woke up on his birthday and found a cartload of manure, what did he say?
Answer: 'There's GOT to be a pony here somewhere!' I think that joke was the
1950's version of When life gives you lemons, make lemonade.
TurqB wrote:
One of the values of working with a teacher who can
blast you out of your socks with shakti is that when
he does, there is nothing left. No beliefs, no opinions,
no you to even *have* beliefs and opinions. You're
washed clean, for a short time, and then the beliefs
and the
Turq and other guru enthusiasts, take a look at this quote posted for us by
Ron from Sri Lakshmana Swami, a realized devotee of Ramana Maharishi. It
provides a great example of why I look at gurus and what they teach quite
differently than you do. Turb told me gurus don't speak against
comments
below:
--- Bronte Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Turq and other guru enthusiasts, take a look at
this quote posted for us by Ron from Sri Lakshmana
Swami, a realized devotee of Ramana Maharishi. It
provides a great example of why I look at gurus and
what they teach quite differently than
Regardless of who published the article, it's true that lots of scientists
don't accept the new party line on global warming that is being now handed us
as gospel. I've read articles from several sources along this same line (sorry,
didn't copy and can't quote -- next time I see some, I'll send
Come on, buddy. I wasn't trying to lecture you. I was trying to answer the
well-thought-out arguments you made a few days ago in answer to my post. You
objected that day to my phrase, come on, guru fans, I'm ready for the
snowballs, so today I changed it to guru enthusiasts, and still seem to
Rick wrote:
Its my observation that more enlightened people are more focused and
determined in desiring and fulfilling desires.
Bronte writes:
Certainly they are. But I wasn't talking about enlightened people when I
spoke about many sincere spiritual people having trouble.
Rick wrote:
LOL, maybe we should get my enlightened people and your enlightened people
together for a Sharks/Jets- style rumble.
But seriously, if they agree with your characterization of true
enlightenment, does that mean that they admit to having been neutered, or are
you
Edg, you are a sweetheart for sticking up for me. I like you a lot. You are a
brain with a funny bone. But listen, I am not that emotionally scarred, no more
than the rest of us. Nor am I a seeker at this point in my life. My passion
doesn't come from harbored wounds or spiritual need but from
:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
brontebaxter8@ wrote:
Come on, buddy. I wasn't trying to lecture you. I was trying to
answer the well-thought-out arguments you made a few days ago in
answer to my post. You objected that day to my phrase, come on, guru
fans, I'm ready
Bronte wrote:
I studied there for ten years. I left because it got into some
weird stuff, like wild drinking as a path to enlightenment.
Lurk wrote:
How did that play out?
Bronte:
I didn't stick around to find out first-hand, but I have a number of friends
who stayed in the
Hey, Lurk, I relate. Being it is the thing, just living it. Good for you for
seeing past the smoke and mirrors.
Bronte
lurkernomore20002000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bronte:
What is your history, Lurk? I presume you once were into TM? What
happened with that and afterwards?
Off-world, where did you get that stuff about the kundulini? Is it a strong
feeling you get, something some teacher predicted, something you read
somewhere? It sounds kind of extreme to me. I think a new time is coming, but I
hope transformation doesn't have to burn us alive. Kundulini can come
Jim, your story is so simple and humble and shining and compelling. It brought
tears to my eyes. This inspires me. Thank you for a drink of pure bliss.
Bronte
jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, let me try to figure this out
What happened to me, and my view
of the
Can you describe some of the ways it grows and grows? I've wondered along these
lines. When you're sharing the mind of God, as you put it, is it possible to
know whatever you ask to? Like say you want to know what Bronte looks like,
will you suddenly get an accurate picture in your head of me?
Then Jim, would you tell us about angels? I would love that. I sort of
collect people's angel experiences. What do they look like to you? What do
you see them do? What personal interactions have you had with them? Do they
really go around like Superman saving the day for people, saving them
and
accept the fear. This will happen within the next 5 years
planetwide.
OffWorld
off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Off-world, where did you get that stuff about the kundulini
:
On Sep 15, 2007, at 3:00 AM, Bronte Baxter wrote:
Off-world, where did you get that stuff about the kundulini? Is it a strong
feeling you get, something some teacher predicted, something you read
somewhere? It sounds kind of extreme to me. I think a new time is coming, but I
hope
Jim wrote:
God's management of the Universe isn't directly comprehensible, and yet there
are ways to gain access into that mind, ways to sense it, feel it, and merge
with it. Its all about transforming boundaries, stories, limitations into
freedom and
infinity.
Bronte writes:
Bronte writes:
The fact that your guru presumed to send a message to me brings up the
emotion of irritation and anger, and I'm looking at that to see what goes. I
realize I do have the opinion that gurus in general are part of a racket aimed
at exploiting seekers. I have little
Jim Flanigan wrote:
I mean no offense at all, though your perspective on angels is
almost as if they are curiosities that you wish to study.
Bronte writes:
Nonsense. That's your misinterpretation. I haven't told you my own angel
experiences or why they are important in my life.
Who is SSRS? Why do you respect him?
Perhaps angels appear a variety of ways, depending on how people expect to
see them.
new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
I see many,
many, many of them
So are you slim, blonde and sunshiney?
jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Flanigan wrote:
I mean no offense at all, though your perspective on angels is
almost as if they are curiosities
Jim:
Brahman is *always* the beginning of the road, Always new, always
fresh, always like the dawn, through the full ripeness of the day--
not static at all. I have no idea what comes next, except to say it
is new, wonderful, and fulfilling.: -)
Bronte:
Got it. Good explanation,
, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you describe some of the ways it grows and grows? I've wondered
along these lines. When you're sharing the mind of God, as you put
it, is it possible to know whatever you ask to? Like say you want to
know what Bronte looks like, will you suddenly get
Hey, Nabby, I respect your right to think differently and I enjoy reading your
unique perspective much of the time. But that remark is unfair and you're
getting personal. Lurk made a statement from his heart in response to a
question from me. It's judgmental and beyond your scope of knowledge
Wow! That IS news! I'm no scientist but it sounds pretty freaky indeed! I don't
find it unsettling though. If it's true that the planet is moving into a new
age, and all of us with it, this could be part of the transformation of matter.
I wonder why it's happening?
I've read other places
Lurk:
What about the rabbits, or bunnies? Are they affectionate? Can
they be litter box trained? Do they get along with the cats
geese? Do you keep the bunnies and geese in a pen? Do you live in
metropolitan setting, or rural one?
Bronte:
The bunnies are adorable -- very funny and
Bronte wrote:
I've read other places that the earth is slowing losing its
magnetism (nothing mainstream here, but private unapproved
scientists have been saying so). Maybe that's related to the kilogram
thing somehow.
Judy wrote:
But why would it be affecting only that single kilogram
Indra The Unifying Value of the Self which unifies all the laws of
nature in order to promote evolution (the Power of dharma)
Indrani or Sachi The feminine power of unification and evolution
Hmm. If gods are simply anthropomophisms invented by the sages to explain
concepts they
:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
brontebaxter8@ wrote:
Off-World, this is absolutely exciting. I've always wanted to
talk to someone who was having red-hot, metal-melting kundulini on an
almost daily basis. I have so much I want to ask. So here goes, with
inserted questions below
About the fear and emptiness ... what is it that's empty? What is
the fear OF? That you will burn up? I
The fear is of anihilation. It seems like anihilation, like something
else could take over that is not me, but I have come to the point of
facing that very powerful sense, and not
?
authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Judy wrote:
Actually, that the earth is losing its magnetic field
*is* mainstream; see this article on CNN.com from 2003:
http://tinyurl. com/yzfv
[Bronte: The only guidance needed is one's own inner guidance. It's the
nature of the human spirit to wake up.]
Ron:
My comments, coming from my path will mirror that of Ramana Maharishi's
admonisions.
Bronte:
I disagree with almost everything of the philosophy of the
Judy:
Well, to start with, I think I was confused as to
what you meant by spinning. You mean spinning
*in place*, right? If so, isn't it the string it's
suspended by winding up and then unwinding that
causes the weight to stop spinning and change
direction?
Bronte:
The analogy isn't
uns_tressor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bronte:
I've wondered about that point myself, but how about
this angle? If you take a pendalum hanging from a string
and spin it, it goes a while in one direction. Then, to
my
Judy:
And here's one that was just discovered in
Michigan:
http://www.gullmead owfarms.com/
Bronte:
No, that is not a crop circle -- it's a corn maze -- a human-created pattern
in a field that customers are invited to pay a few dollars to come in and
explore, for fun and
Edg:
Bronte - you might find it helpful to google this issue. I'm thinking you
don't understand the difference between the magnetic poles switching and the
ball, that the earth is, suddenly switching the direction of its spinning.
Bronte:
Edg, it appears that you see me as
---Sure, one can get Enlightened without a Guru; likewise, one can
learn how to play the violin without a teacher. (as Borak would
sayNOT !).
Bronte:
Curious, I know lots of people who've taught themselves musical instruments.
-
I see. Okay, I bit. A good one on me.
- Bronte
curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy:
And here's one that was just discovered in
Michigan:
http://www.gullmead owfarms.com
Bronte: Edg, it appears that you see me as stupid.
Edg:
No! Lacking information, er, ya, but ain't nothing to do with
your IQ. I lack tons of information in every field.
Bronte:
It's just that when you question if a person can't see the difference
betweeen two obviously
tells Poonja he's already
Enlightened. Poonja got it and became Enlightened on the spot.
But then, RM was a teacher, wasn't he?
In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Bronte Baxter brontebaxter8@ ...
wrote:
---Sure, one can get Enlightened without a Guru; likewise, one can
learn how to play
Quotation from the space-brothers interview article:
JF: There are so called abductions and cattle mutilations. Should one
take them seriously? What is this in relation to UFOs?
BC: The question of abductions and cattle mutilations is part of the
general cover-up. They are a way of
the
benefits in anything/everything, and discard what's useless.
So, you believe that people can get Enlightened without a Guru. OK,
name one such person. That's your challenge for today.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Bronte:
My friend, what should I
on their own, but they're alweays listening
to music, so the music is their guru. The odds of
going from avidya to realization without help from the
Absolute in some form or shape is just about nil.
--- Bronte Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bronte:
My friend, what should I call you? I can't
Sounds pretty funny, Pete, I'll order it.
- Bronte
Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Bronte Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quotation from the space-brothers interview
article:
JF: There are so called abductions and cattle
mutilations. Should one
take them seriously
PROTECTED] wrote: From:
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bronte
Baxter
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 6:51 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Off-World's Kundulini Experience (Was Dear
Bevan and Dr. Hagelin
you guys.
- Bronte
off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 15, 2007, at 3:00 AM, Bronte Baxter wrote:
Off-world, where did you get that stuff about the kundulini? Is
it
a strong feeling you get
Off-World:
Keep us in touch how it goes with your experience. I am glad mine
made some sense to you. Things are happening in world consciousness,
and I think we will see massive changes in our lifetimes.
Remember to wear your seatbelt !
Bronte:
My boyfriend always reminds me.
Righto, brother, and no hard feelings in the bargain. Honest sharing of
thoughts is good, however it turns out. I look forward to chatting more with
you in the future.
- Bronte
Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well Bronte,
The honesty of this situation is I have presented my
Bill wrote:
The soul is a pure reflection of God called the Jivatma, when in the
beginning when it was tempted by Lucifer (maya/avidya) in the Garden
of Eden (pure innocence) it was warned not to eat of the tree of
knowledge of Good and evil or surely it would die (be subject to the wheel of
Bill wrote:
The Divine is a mode of speech designed to shelter us from our frightful
picture of a horrible, wrathful God. However is also shelters us from having to
confront the Being at the heart of the most powerful experiences of deity
found in the western tradition - all-consuming
Christ said I and the Father are One where is the two in that?
They are one but they are also two, as a branch can say I am the tree and
still be a branch. You can experience being one with the Infinite yet an
individual at the same time.
-
Ron wrote:
I am not enlightened and can not say from direct experience - I can only pass
along what 3 people here say in my path- then again, the honesty of the
situation is unless it is known from direct experience, then it is a belief
system- so you have my beliefs presented.
Peter wrote:
Ron, unfortuanately you're wasting your breath on
these mala covered samsarins who insist on
individuality and can not recognize the function of
the ego in this belief that somehow realization of
That includes individuality. Poor deluded bhogis.
Bronte:
I would say it's
I replied to this once. Somehow it never posted, so here goes again:
From Judy, quoting Bronte:
To claim that the ego is only a Me is to perceive only its limited
expression. Such limited expression certainly needs dissolving for cosmic
bliss to occur. But the Me only needs to
differs from the others. Thus, semantics enters into the picture,
true..
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
brontebaxter8@ wrote:
I
--- yagyax wrote:
Obviously, the
false I does vanish but this is only one component
of what makes up
a person, which distinguishes one person from
another: MMY is not
SSRS, etc.
-- Peter wrote:
What distinguishes MMY from SSRS are space/time
qualities. Of course these are different
the question of there being individuals or not. Of
course there are individuals!...but some think not.
If individuals didn't exist, there would be no point in having
Heaven on Earth.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi, Yagyax. Never saw you
Hey, New Morning. I've been loving your posts on opinions that are 97.9 %
true, rules of engagement for dialoging, etc. Your observations are very
profound to me.
Regarding this question, I'm not sure what you are asking -- this is thorny
stuff to put into words, so abstract -- but
Replying to New Morning's excellent questions (below) on this thread:
It appears that all these people we hold up as enlightened masters wear the
shine off their halos the more we get to know them. I say the reason is our
concept of enlightenment. If all that means to us is that the
Pretty darn good questions again, New Morning. I think the various experiences
come from our varying expectations. I went to see Amma, got real close to her,
didn't do the hug thing. I was never impressed, felt no dharshan. Yet a friend
of mine swears by her -- the dharshan for him is intense.
Judy wrote:
I think the notion of free will is an artifact
of duality.
Bronte writes:
Wow, Judy. This statement of yours demonstrates that these aren't just
semantic distinctions between us. I assume you are saying that from your
perspective free will does not exist in higher
Judy wrote:
Who here has been claiming the ego doesn't exist?? Who has suggested
enlightenment involves annihilating your individual consciousness? ? I'm
increasingly coming to think, Bronte, that you're defending your position
against a big bunch of straw men.,___
Bronte
Judy wrote:
I totally agree with you that the notions that the ego
doesn't exist or that enlightenment involves annihilating
one's individual consciousness are outlandish. I just
don't think anyone has been proposing such notions.
Bronte writes:
Okay, Judy. Thanks for clarifying your
Judy wrote:
I wonder if you missed a post I made a week or two ago
about the Everything is perfect just as it is idea, in
response to a post of yours about it. I've reproduced it
below:
Bronte writes:
Yes, Judy, I did miss it, and I'm very glad you re-sent it. It is very
Flanegin wrote:
Yep, from the standpoint of dualistic, relative life, multiple
problems are seen, and must be solved, as they should be, living a
dynamic and responsible life. From the non dual experience of Being
though, even the change is seen and embraced as perfect. The union
of the
Rick Archer contributed:
Repetition aloud of His name is better than praise. Better still is its
faint murmur. But the best is repetition within the mind -- and that is
meditation Better than such broken thought is its steady and continuous
flow like the flow of oil or of a
Yagyax wrote:
Aristotle arrived at the conclusion that life is Bliss (he used
the phrase Being-In-Itself ) on the basis of his own experience, as
does (who's the person you're speaking on behalf of, Byron Katie?)?
But I keep up on modern philosophical topics, and haven't seen one
Mathabrahman wrote:
Everything's perfect, including the desire to make things better.
Here, we could run into a genuine paradox; but we're dealing with
karma and Dharma, areas which are innately unfathomable.
Therefore, even Sages may fall short of expertise on the topic of
what's perfect
And you have zero logic or rationale or ANY argument whatsoever
behind anything you say, except to attack me. Pathetic little man
you are.
OffWorld
Bronte writes:
Uh-oh, Off-World, my dear kundulini wise man, the fire got a little too hot
for you, bro. You broke into A
I've read and heard great stuff about this method. For one thing, it was
used with clinically depressed patients in trials to see how it fared as
therapy compared to antidepressants. Turns out it had equal and similar effects
on brain chemistry!
IMO, this is one of the most
Rick wrote:
Gurus are just people who are farther up the mountain, or perhaps sitting on
its summit.
Bronte writes:
If this is all they were, darlin', they wouldn't be intent on wearing crowns,
having us prostrate ourselves at their feet, call on them to marry us, give our
children
This was beautiful, Rick. I disagree with the devotional path and so many of
your beliefs, but there must be something you are doing right to have such
beautiful experiences. I feel the same about Flanegin. I learn from you guys at
the same time as I debate you. My understanding is an
Off-World:
I am saying those things in a totally calm voice...can' t you tell?
A flame is dropping bombs on people. Roughing a guy up verbally for
acting like a dumbass is the enlightened thing to do. An
unenlightened person would be all nice about it at all times. Though
I am not enlightened
Dear DS: Are you responding to Rick Archer or to Ron (Hridaya)? The comments
below don't sound like Rick, and unless he sent you these questions privately,
it isn't him, because such a post from him does not appear on the forum. You
misconstrued me, Bronte Baxter, as being New Morning
That flaming Scottsman Off-World wrote:
It is clear what Ron Paul stands for, and that he will never be a dictator as
you are trying to make out. He does not have that sort of energy, nor the
charisma, to be a dictator. You're fearmongering is laughable, and will go
nowhere. It is a joke
I would say, spiritualizing matter. Making it as perfect and free as the
Infinite itself. How would you answer this question, Suzie?
suziezuzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the greatest and most satisfying thing a person can accomplish
in the material, relative world?
with the same
sick messages. IMO, of course, with all due respect to yours. - Bronte
authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
At the start of this thread, you quoted Ramana Maharishi on the
value of letting
Here's another email that I wrote way early this afternoon, and I don't see
that it posted. - Bronte
Note: forwarded message attached.
-
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel
and lay it on us.---BeginMessage---
David Spero quoted an article including this snip:
Or the crazy-as-fuck John Birch Society, to which Paul is more than
happy to grant the occasional interview and even speak at their
dinners ...
followed by a line calling Ron Paul a neo-Nazi. In a later post Spero says
Paul is the
] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That flaming Scottsman Off-World wrote:
It is clear what Ron Paul stands for, and that he will never be a
dictator as you are trying to make out. He does not have that sort of
energy, nor the charisma
Interesting article. Bronte's comments in italics. The article states:
1. Before you learned the language that you now think in, the background of
awareness was there.
So was the essence of my individuality, which is beyond language.
2. Then you learned the word I in
Gimminee critters, Ron. Here you go again. You are a nice, sincere guy, but
this proselytizing is a drag. Isn't it an edifice of the ego, that you are
always decrying?
Who are you to tell lurkers on this site that they are not welcome just to
read the posts, and what authority do you
How about this for a parable? A man met a man who told him about air. You
can't live without it, he was told. But I already have air, said the first man.
I am breathing every moment. No you aren't, said the second man. You can't
possibly be breathing if you haven't had a teacher show you
I think the domes have some effect, much as I have gripes against the movement.
I used to teach school at MIU Elementary, often missing the domes because I was
in rebellion at the time, or just plain busy correcting papers. Every day when
superradiance time came, I felt an intense calm, an
Of Bronte Baxter
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 7:32 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The fallacy is that a *Me* can Gain Realization
Christ said I and the Father are One where is the two in that?
They are one but they are also
? I'm
talking in a different way about the same thing.
- Bronte
Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Bronte Baxter
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 7:32 PM
Billy wrote:
I think in order for it to be stronger than the nuclear force as
Hagelin puts it, you have to be operating FROM the home of all the
laws of nature, pure consciousness, not somewhere in the vicinity.
Bronte writes:
I agree. You can't smash the atom if you smash right next to
Clip from the posted article (Bronte's commments in italitics):
1. Before you learned the language that you now think in, the background of
awareness was there.
So was the essence of my individuality, which is beyond language.
2. Then you learned the word I in
Stu, are you a script writer, a director, a cameraman or what? What is Pushing
Daisies about? Is it a comedy? - Bronte
Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stu wrote:
For anyone who cares, you may want to look at my latest work.
Pushing Daisies
Wednesday night 7c/8 pm ABC.
s.
You
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
