--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 4:58 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 2:38 PM, authfriend wrote:
He does mention the word, Judy, in
On Oct 2, 2007, at 8:22 AM, authfriend wrote:
OK. I'd be happy to try to explain further if you
can say where you got lost. (Your thoughts go around
in so many circles *sounds* as if you're saying I
use circular reasoning, or am just babbling without
getting anywhere.)
I don't believe in
And it just goes on and on and on... Who is going to be big enough
to drop it and who is so small that they have to have the last word?
** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 2, 2007, at 8:22 AM, authfriend wrote:
snip
What could that have been? I don't see what else
it could have been other than something they were
feeling guilty about. Note that he did *not* say
he told them
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote:
And yes, I can empathize with some of the things
you mention, but my honest experience is that often
I get along better with younger women than with
On Oct 2, 2007, at 9:37 AM, authfriend wrote:
Yeah, that's kind of where I felt you were going with this,
and it may very well be a valid interpretation. However,
telling them there was no basis for feeling guilty may have
been out of place at the time, depending on how well he did
or
Oh, goodie. :-)
It's not every morning that I get a chance to
start my day off with a good rant, but here I
have two idiots offering me an opportunity to
do so, on a silver platter.
I simply cannot resist.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From Turquoise B, age 62, an original, complete post,
#149707, Sept. 23, 2007, titled:
I don't care what you call it -
...and I'm sorry, given whatever Hindu or Newage
stuff you wish to project upon it,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From Turquoise B, age 62, an original, complete post,
#149707, Sept. 23, 2007, titled:
Oh, one more thing, putz. I'm only 61. Won't
be 62 for a couple more months.
And yes, even though I didn't wind up having
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, goodie. :-)
It's not every morning that I get a chance to
start my day off with a good rant, but here I
have two idiots offering me an opportunity to
do so, on a silver platter.
I simply cannot resist.
On Oct 1, 2007, at 9:45 AM, authfriend wrote:
And this after he's already handed the antichoice
side a huge win by *accepting* the role that the
guilt imposed by the antichoice folks plays for
many women in making the decision to abort so
difficult, as I pointed out in another post that
Barry
(Note that Barry will almost certainly read Sal's
post but not my response, and will use Sal's post
to try to further demonize me.)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 9:45 AM, authfriend wrote:
And this after he's already handed
On Oct 1, 2007, at 11:50 AM, authfriend wrote:
It's right there in front of both our noses, Sal.
It's in the third paragraph of your quote from
Barry's post, as we'll see.
He does mention the word, Judy, in reference to the trips he felt that
MS was attempting to lay on the women who chose
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 11:50 AM, authfriend wrote:
It's right there in front of both our noses, Sal.
It's in the third paragraph of your quote from
Barry's post, as we'll see.
He does mention the word, Judy, in
On Oct 1, 2007, at 2:38 PM, authfriend wrote:
He does mention the word, Judy, in reference to the trips
he felt that MS was attempting to lay on the women who chose
abortion.
No, in reference to what Barry suggests the women he
consoled were feeling--not using the word explicitly,
but
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
And yes, I can empathize with some of the things
you mention, but my honest experience is that often
I get along better with younger women than with women
my own age because the younger ones have more of the
On Oct 1, 2007, at 3:23 PM, mainstream20016 wrote:
It seems that the domesticity and procreative drives are intense,
There is no inherant procreative or baby-drive, MS--that's just
misogynistic crap. If there were, there wouldn't be so much social
pressure to have kids. Whenever that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 2:38 PM, authfriend wrote:
He does mention the word, Judy, in reference to the trips
he felt that MS was attempting to lay on the women who chose
abortion.
No, in reference to what Barry
On Oct 1, 2007, at 4:58 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 2:38 PM, authfriend wrote:
He does mention the word, Judy, in reference to the trips
he felt that MS was attempting to lay on the women who chose
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 3:23 PM, mainstream20016 wrote:
It seems that the domesticity and procreative drives are intense,
There is no inherant procreative or baby-drive, MS--that's just
misogynistic crap. If there
On Oct 1, 2007, at 8:44 PM, mainstream20016 wrote:
You seem to be saying that 'so much social pressure to have kids' is
an artificial construct
You're sharp today, MS.
- and when 'that' relaxes, family size would naturally decrease
significantly.
Again, chalk up another point.
I contend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been carefully staying out of this,
partly because, on the few non-argument-
driven forums I hang out in on the Net,
abortion is a banned issue.
The reason is that, as someone said earlier,
one is either
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
I have been carefully staying out of this,
partly because, on the few non-argument-
driven forums I hang out in on the Net,
abortion is a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016
mainstream20016@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
snip
You have NOTHING to say about it.
It's not your body.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
snip
Therefore advocating anti-abortion laws merely helps abortion to
continue. You are COMPLETELY complicit in abortion if you
advocate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Killing is bad. Advocates of abortion encourage abortion as
an easy choice, devoid of any concern for the fetus. Yes, the
abortion perspective is selfish. Killing for selfish reasons
is toxic to society.
Are
I have been carefully staying out of this,
partly because, on the few non-argument-
driven forums I hang out in on the Net,
abortion is a banned issue.
The reason is that, as someone said earlier,
one is either pregnant or one isn't. It's
that kinda issue.
You're either for or against. Like
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
It is *not* as if abortion is an easy decision.
You're trying to make it sound as if it is one.
Actually, it should be a lot easier than it
often is. A woman shouldn't have to feel
shame and guilt in addition to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Equality with men who advocate violence against the innocent is not
virtuous. Both
women and Kelts have been degraded by your argument.
If abortions were the only so called violence against life, and
killing on
Right on, Jimmy!
Thou shall not kill.
Pretty simple to understand, almost impossible to be perfect at.
I'm going to get a half a coconut shell, a diaper and a walking staff.
Can you imagine the first-person-I-went-up-to's response as I begged
for my daily ration of rice?
It seems just about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right on, Jimmy!
Thou shall not kill.
Pretty simple to understand, almost impossible to be perfect at.
I'm going to get a half a coconut shell, a diaper and a walking
staff.
Can you imagine the
Mainstream: The wanton disregard of the fetus in determining to abort
is incredibly cruel.
DS: I believe it's more cruel for a religion or government to abduct
the bodily rights of a living individual and force them to reproduce
against their will.
Mainstream: Abortion coarsens social
32 matches
Mail list logo
