On 3/9/2014 6:03 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote:
*Rakshasas* /raksasas/ (Sanskrit)
>
According to the Dictionary of Hinduism, the term Raksasa is "...an
epithet applied in the Rig Veda to Indian indigenes whose
characteristics were likened to demons of popular folklore. Most of the
native resi
On 3/11/2014 9:02 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
You're trolling here.
> The term 'Internet Troll' is frequently abused to slander opponents
in heated debates and is frequently misapplied by those who are ignorant
of Internet etiquette.
But then we all know not to take you seriously, espe
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 3/10/2014 8:43 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
Richard,we do not take your posts seriously per your instructions. >
The term 'Internet Troll' is frequently abused to slander opponents in heated
debates and is frequentl
On 3/10/2014 8:43 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
Richard, we do not take your posts seriously per your instructions.
>
The term 'Internet Troll' is frequently abused to slander opponents in
heated debates and is frequently misapplied by those who are ignorant of
internet etiquette.
Judy
On 3/10/2014 7:01 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Richard, neither you or Share take yourselves or what you post
> seriously; I think that is what you two find so attractive about each
> other. Two peas in a pod. However, if posting here maintains your
> mental and emotional health and help
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Richard, neither you or Share take yourselves or what you post seriously; I
think that is what you two find so attractive about each other. Two peas in a
pod. However, if posting here maintains your mental and emotional health and
helps you b
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Emily, thanks for saying I'm similar to Richard. I take that as a compliment.
I figured you might.
On Monday, March 10, 2014 7:01 PM, "emilymaenot@..." wrote:
Richard, neither you or Share take yourselves or what you post seriousl
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 3/10/2014 9:19 AM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
(Don't pay any attention to Richard, for pete's sake. He's just trolling, as
usual.) >
You need to stop the lying, Judy. Calling someone a troll makes assumptions
about a writer's motives that are im
Emily, thanks for saying I'm similar to Richard. I take that as a compliment.
On Monday, March 10, 2014 7:01 PM, "emilymae...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Richard, neither you or Share take yourselves or what you post seriously; I
think that is what you two find so attractive about each other. T
Richard, neither you or Share take yourselves or what you post seriously; I
think that is what you two find so attractive about each other. Two peas in a
pod. However, if posting here maintains your mental and emotional health and
helps you be kind to Rita, than more power to you.
---In F
On 3/10/2014 9:28 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
I don't believe anybody said it was "so difficult." It's just a nuisance.
>
It's more than a nuisance - it's a pain, as is the rest of Neo. It's
Yahoo's way to dumb things down for the newbies, I guess. You can't even
see the threaded posts seq
On 3/10/2014 9:19 AM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
(Don't pay any attention to Richard, for pete's sake. He's just
trolling, as usual.)
>
You need to stop the lying, Judy. Calling someone a troll makes
assumptions about a writer's motives that are impossible to determine
unless you are a mind reader.
On 3/10/2014 9:11 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
This may come as a shock to you, but it's not necessarily the case
that everyone is so utterly fascinated by your conversations that the
"flow" will stick in their minds.
>
You totally missed the point of posting to FFL. Who cares what other
pe
On 3/10/2014 9:10 AM, anartax...@yahoo.com wrote:
What is it about FFL that makes it so importantly serious that a
conversation, argument must proceed a certain way?
>
That's because we are old and we have already made up our minds about
things and so we're not going to change much anymore. We
On 3/10/2014 9:10 AM, anartax...@yahoo.com wrote:
If you work, you cannot be serious here.
>
It works for me - posting from a home office and chatting on the
internet at the same time, all hours of the day and night, is fun and I
take it very seriously. I've been posting since 1998 and will pr
Good points anartaxius. However my experience shows that the motivation for
staying with TM can be anything. I know people who began meditating for simple
reasons of health and have been doing TM regularily now for 54 years. Believe
me, for some of these people enlightenment has never been a m
Nabby, it actually is a link says 'show message history' in the reply window
which you now seem to have found. I missed it for a while. But occasionally I
will enter a thread not replying to a particular post, and then either delete
the previous message(s) or do not show message history. But if
Yes, thank you.
OK, did I get it right now ? Anyways, what makes you think I even read the
post from MJ and Sal ? I do sometimes read your though but haven't even seen
the "see all messages" thing, I'm not here often enough to have even noticed it.
I don't believe anybody said it
OK, did I get it right now ? Anyways, what makes you think I even read the post
from MJ and Sal ? I do sometimes read your though but haven't even seen the
"see all messages" thing, I'm not here often enough to have even noticed it.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I don't belie
I don't believe anybody said it was "so difficult." It's just a nuisance. And
the point is that you could eliminate that nuisance with a single mouse click,
as Salyavin, Michael, and I have asked you to. There's no reason for you not to
do it except to be deliberately discourteous.
This may c
I see. If you work, you cannot be serious here.
What is it about FFL that makes it so importantly serious that a conversation,
argument must proceed a certain way? Does this require a certain kind of
obsession? Enlightenment is the ultimate joke. Why not just have fun?
---In FairfieldLife@
On 3/10/2014 4:51 AM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
> I also wondered why it was so difficult for some to follow the flow.
> Go figure :-)
>
It has been suggested that the reason some of the FFL informants can't
keep up with the conversation flow is because of ADD. But, it's much
simpler than that - the
I also wondered why it was so difficult for some to follow the flow. Go figure
:-)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 3/9/2014 7:49 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
> I'd say please press the "show message history" before posting so we
> can see what you are on about
>
There are only
On 3/9/2014 8:45 PM, doctordumb...@rocketmail.com wrote:
> I am SO tired of your "Chimp at the keyboard" routine...
>
You are not even making any sense. Anyone who meditates with the goal of
attaining enlightenment is a "Buddhist".
I am SO tired of your "Chimp at the keyboard" routine...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 3/9/2014 6:58 AM, doctordumbass@... mailto:doctordumbass@... wrote:
Buddhism has the little DL dude, and Uma Thurman's dad, and the DL does
nothing except smile, and no one has ever hea
On 3/9/2014 7:49 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
> I'd say please press the "show message history" before posting so we
> can see what you are on about
>
There are only about six or seven us having an online conversation these
days - I can remember what each one you has posted the day before. I
don't ne
On 3/9/2014 6:58 AM, doctordumb...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Buddhism has the little DL dude, and Uma Thurman's dad, and the DL
does nothing except smile, and no one has ever heard of Uma Thurman's dad
>
Buddhism has the Buddha AND the DL dude, and there a millions of
Buddhists that have heard of U
On 3/8/2014 9:46 PM, s3raph...@yahoo.com wrote:
Does practising being a Buddhist leave you emotionally needy and
insecure? If so what's the point?
>
You need to realize that this is a pattern: what students learn from
their teachers sometimes they become. So far as we can tell from his
writing
Rakshasas raksasas (Sanskrit) [from the verbal root raksh to protect] The
preservers; in modern popular superstition in India, commonly associated with
evil spirits and demons. Esoterically they are the gibborim (giants) of the
Bible, the fourth root-race or Atlanteans:
"when Brahma created th
On 3/9/2014 6:23 AM, doctordumb...@rocketmail.com wrote:
> What are the other two rakshasas, besides NATO?
>
It would probably be a good idea to look up what the work "rakshasas"
means in Sanskrit. Maybe some people don't realize is this was the word
used by the Caucasian Aryan invaders of India
On 3/9/2014 3:01 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
I've seen at least one person levitate fer real and turn invisible and
stuff like that and then turn around and act like a total dick.
>
Maybe we don't care if you're a dick or not, or where you have been - we
just want you to tell us the secret of the
But Share, something did happen next.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Methinks the lady doth protest too much. The one in Seattle that is! The thing
is Emily, I replied to emptybill as I was moved to reply and in a way that made
sense to me. One has to start there I think a
Methinks the lady doth protest too much. The one in Seattle that is! The thing
is Emily, I replied to emptybill as I was moved to reply and in a way that made
sense to me. One has to start there I think and see what happens next.
On Sunday, March 9, 2014 12:12 PM, "emilymae...@yahoo.com"
w
Well, it is amusing to watch Share's mind...I wonder if she was following mine.
The word "methinks" is one used by Shakespeare. Shakespeare wrote of paradox
and, if you will, "wondrous paradox." And on this topic of paradox, from the
book "Shakespeare and the Paradox" we find the following: "W
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
From the information Emptybill posted: "Will I get everything I want when
I'm "enlightened?" "No. But once you know self, you won’t want anything else."
I'm glad you could make heads or tails from what Share wrote below because I
couldn't
My experience has been more like, 'be careful what you wish for' - due to
thoughts being entertained at a more powerful place, desires happen - all of
them.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
From the information Emptybill posted: "Will I get everything I want when
I'm "enlight
From the information Emptybill posted: "Will I get everything I want when I'm
"enlightened?" "No. But once you know self, you won’t want anything else."
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Emily, methunks that there is no disconnect between enlightenment, which you
asked about, a
Ah, OK - Would've liked to hear it from the Big M.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
He didn't say. But Mr. Benjamin Crème has said that the material forces that
was driven underground as an effect of WWII has resurfaced in Israel and in a
undisclosed place in Eastern Europe.
Salyavin, it was something about NATO being one of three rakshasas.
On Sunday, March 9, 2014 7:49 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
I'd say please press the "show message history" before posting so we can see
what you are on about but then I saw the words "Benjamin Creme" and realised I
probab
as similar to comparing
real history to stories read on Fox News by bimbos. :-)
From: salyavin808
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 9, 2014 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Funny article from the Guardian Newspaper
about TM
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wro
I'd say please press the "show message history" before posting so we can see
what you are on about but then I saw the words "Benjamin Creme" and realised I
probably wasn't missing much. But do it anyway Nabby, it helps with the flow...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
He di
He didn't say. But Mr. Benjamin Crème has said that the material forces that
was driven underground as an effect of WWII has resurfaced in Israel and in a
undisclosed place in Eastern Europe.
living person who embodies that which he or she is hoping to share with
others. No words are necessary for this process to occur, and no words can
possibly capture what is transmitted wordlessly. IMO, of course.
From: "s3raphita@..."
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday
embodies that which he or she is hoping to share with
others. No words are necessary for this process to occur, and no words can
possibly capture what is transmitted wordlessly. IMO, of course.
From: "s3raphita@..."
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 9, 20
What are the other two rakshasas, besides NATO?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I think Maharishi distinguished between the personal and impersonal angle when
commenting on world affairs. When labeling NATO as one the 3 last Rakshahas to
not yet having been dissolved or Britain
Emily, methunks that there is no disconnect between enlightenment, which you
asked about, and life, which was the context of my answer and includes BOTH
kinds of smile (-:
On Saturday, March 8, 2014 9:10 PM, "emilymae...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Methinks you may have changed what I was ask
by transmission
from a living person who embodies that which he or she is hoping to share with
others. No words are necessary for this process to occur, and no words can
possibly capture what is transmitted wordlessly. IMO, of course.
________
From: "s3raph..
Thanks for the reply. I followed your link and enjoyed the poems. Turquoise Bee
was clearly someone who enjoyed the more earthy pleasures. And he didn't try to
hide his preferences so can't be accused of being a hypocrite. Nothing wrong
with that - but did he display any spiritual accomplishment
Methinks you may have changed what I was asking to make an attempt to talk of
the topic, "life." I have now changed my own context to "Share talking about
life" and I am amused (in a friendly way).
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Emily, emptybill and Doc are way better at d
Emily, emptybill and Doc are way better at describing it than I am. I just have
glimpses and sense it all around in everything and everyone. It's a state of
wondrous paradox.
On Saturday, March 8, 2014 7:02 PM, "emilymae...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Share, how does your comment relate to the
Share, how does your comment relate to the article and to what Emptybill's
comment was? Can you elaborate? What is "enlightenment" to you. Sounds like
you think it is a "thing"?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Emptybill,
Sorry, I did not weep, I read and enjoyed, thank you.
Emptybill,
Sorry, I did not weep, I read and enjoyed, thank you. It's ok if enlightenment
gets me instead of me getting it. Six of one, half dozen of another (-:
So we could say, combining your words and punditsir's: enlightenment is only
gonna get me as much as it gets me. That feels right.
I think Maharishi distinguished between the personal and impersonal angle when
commenting on world affairs. When labeling NATO as one the 3 last Rakshahas to
not yet having been dissolved or Britain as the "Scorpion nation" he certainly
wasn't holding much back :-) But he would be the incarnatio
Share,
Sorry to have to say it again to you but none of us will get any
"enlightenment" at all, not now or at any time - never, ever. Enlightenment is
a silly scam to get you to want something that you already are by nature. It is
more accurately called selling water by the river. There is noth
Yes, very much so. Although, having listened to many of his lectures, and
especially those he broadcast, on-line, before he died, that "sweet truth",
could have quite a fiery bite to it. :-)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
That's right and he always managed to "say the truth but
Richard, you've said it before and I really like that phrase: you are only
going to get as much enlightenment as you're going to get. It just sounds right
and profound and funny too.
Also like the bit about the tea stall wallah. All in all, a gem of a post (-:
In Austin, is the Whole Foods in
If you mean the previous poster in the thread, that makes us have to go hunting
for the last post with that thread title; it's a ways down the list of posts.
Takes a lot less time and effort for you to just click "Show message history"
when you've finished writing your post.
On 3/8/2014 7:37 AM, doctordumb...@rocketmail.com wrote:
What is, "a final renunciation"??? Sounds like people getting
confused, between a monk's life of solitude, and a worldly person's
active life. This concept is a false one - no matter what a person's
state of consciousness, there is no act
That's right and he always managed to "say the truth but say it sweet". That's
quite an achievement considering he had to clear out centuries of
misunderstandings by religious pundits.
I replied to the last poster, is that really hard to understand ?
I always appreciated his penchant for never sugar-coating reality, even when it
meant something had been misinterpreted for many years. It is a cruel thing to
let people continue to believe things which have no basis in reality. And
between you and me, Maharishi could have kicked my ass, big tim
Is it really hard for you to click on "Show message history" so we have some
idea what you're responding to, Nabby?
Sometimes you sound like Maharishi :-) Jai Guru Dev
Sometimes you sound like Maharishi :-)
Jai Guru Dev
What is, "a final renunciation"??? Sounds like people getting confused, between
a monk's life of solitude, and a worldly person's active life. This concept is
a false one - no matter what a person's state of consciousness, there is no
actual lifestyle change, whether they are attached to the obj
From: "s3raph...@yahoo.com"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2014 4:09 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Funny article from the Guardian Newspaper about TM
But more importantly: what is this new handle: TurquoiseBee? Is it someone
making fun of Turquoi
On 3/7/2014 9:09 PM, s3raph...@yahoo.com wrote:
But more importantly: what is this new handle: TurquoiseBee?
>
The Turquoise Bee: The Sixth Dalai Lama of Tibet who is reincarnated as
the FFL "TB" - True Believer. Go figure.
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! A
Israel Regardie's quoting Ramakrishna ("taste the sugar") was because Regardie
(surely correctly?) regarded Aleister Crowley as someone who also didn't make
that final renunciation but explicitly advocated a path in which spiritual
experiences where added to the smorgasboard of sexual and other
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
From: Share Long
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Friday, March 7, 2014 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Funny article from the Guardian Newspaper
about TM
Ann, the flowing along of life IS the Belo
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Ann, the flowing along of life IS the Beloved. As is another person. As is the
piece of music. Even being preoccupied with this or that is the Beloved. In my
experience, the Beloved is all inclusive. Which means including Bawwy. Go
figure!
turq, the Beloved is life and it's too late. It already loves you (-:
On Friday, March 7, 2014 9:21 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
From: Share Long
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Friday, March 7, 2014 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Funny article fr
From: Share Long
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Friday, March 7, 2014 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Funny article from the Guardian Newspaper
about TM
Ann, the flowing along of life IS the Beloved. As is another person. As is the
piece of music.
Ann, the flowing along of life IS the Beloved. As is another person. As is the
piece of music. Even being preoccupied with this or that is the Beloved. In my
experience, the Beloved is all inclusive. Which means including Bawwy. Go
figure!
On Friday, March 7, 2014 8:32 AM, "awoelfleba...@ya
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Seraph, rather than being the "final refusal to lose one's individuality" or
the "final grasping at a gratifying experience? maybe it's simply a case of
extreme devotion, wanting to adore the Beloved rather than become one with the
Beloved.
Seraph, rather than being the "final refusal to lose one's individuality" or
the "final grasping at a gratifying experience? maybe it's simply a case of
extreme devotion, wanting to adore the Beloved rather than become one with the
Beloved.
On Thursday, March 6, 2014 9:18 PM, "s3raph...@yah
The Ramakrishna reference I was trying to recall above came from The Eye in the
Triangle: An Interpretation of Aleister Crowley by Israel Regardie (by the way:
the best short account of Crowley's life). Sri Ramakrishna said "I want to
taste sugar, not become sugar." So what you have here is a
Right - that one would have been my guess. And yes, energetically it is easy to
tell the difference with regard to a person's identity, infinite or localized.
But even beyond that is Brahman, where the identity shifts, yet again, to
infinity, anchored in infinity, vs. UC, which is infinity, anch
This: "There is no loss of individual self-hood in such a state (of Unity).
Rather, individual self-hood, is simply seen, and lived, in its proper place,
secondary, to our Infinite nature. Our infinite nature, then, takes the primary
place, in terms of what we identify, as ourselves."
Doc, my guess is that he was replying to this:
That self-abnegation taught for centuries; the killing of desires, is
inhuman, and inhumane. Why would we get to discover the ever increasing
riches of the inner and outer worlds, to then deny them, in favor of
some sattvic intoxication?
The quote
I agree with you, in principle, but have no idea, which post of mine, you are
referring to.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Thanks for clarifying this point Dr. It's an important point and one which to
use if you want to distinguish real teachers from the charlatan's.
;s dead. Fascinating how long cult indoctrination can
last, isn't it? :-)
From: "awoelflebater@..."
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2014 3:59 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Funny article from the Guardian Newspaper about TM
---In Fairfield
Thanks for clarifying this point Dr. It's an important point and one which to
use if you want to distinguish real teachers from the charlatan's.
harishi would spank, and say "Off the
program." Even though he's dead. Fascinating how long cult indoctrination can
last, isn't it? :-)
From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 20
That self-abnegation taught for centuries; the killing of desires, is inhuman,
and inhumane. Why would we get to discover the ever increasing riches of the
inner and outer worlds, to then deny them, in favor of some sattvic
intoxication?
The quote sounds like a misunderstanding, of the relation
Re "Recommended: the autobiographical statements of Ramakrishna's
experiences": I've not read about Ramakrishna in depth but will definitely make
up for that lapse soon as he is one of the most fascinating characters in
Indian spirituality. Someone (I forget who) claimed that Ramakrishna never
Right,; otoh, it took me a while (2-3 years), to realize that that what
most TM'ers were calling "transcending" was MMY's "fuzzy transcendence", but
does not match any of the Scriptures nor the experiential accounts of Masters
of the great Traditions. Traditions. What's lacking is the third
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Re transcending is a non-event and definitely not interesting.: Not
interesting? Freud, Jung, Sartre and assorted behaviourists claimed that an
experience of pure consciousness (awareness without an object) was impossible.
So if pure awareness
Re transcending is a non-event and definitely not interesting.: Not
interesting? Freud, Jung, Sartre and assorted behaviourists claimed that an
experience of pure consciousness (awareness without an object) was impossible.
So if pure awareness *is* a possible experience it blows such theories ou
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Ann,
My comment is in red:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Maharishi said that everyone passes through transcendence as they go from one
state of consciousness to another (wak
Ann,
My comment is in red:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Maharishi said that everyone passes through transcendence as they go from one
state of consciousness to another (waking to dreaming to sleeping and back
again). He prob
Yes it was Ramana Maharshi (not MMY) who advocated catching yourself at the
moment of waking There are too many "great seers" in Inda. I suspect Judy is
right when she she suggests Ramana is taking an effect for a cause but maybe
his technique has worked for some people. Ann's inability to gras
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I'm not sure what "blanking" refers to, actually. Could you explain?
I remember as a child deciding it was impossible to stop thinking. I worked at
it and worked at it, but I'd always catch myself watching to see whether I
wasn't thinking, an
I'm not sure what "blanking" refers to, actually. Could you explain?
I remember as a child deciding it was impossible to stop thinking. I worked at
it and worked at it, but I'd always catch myself watching to see whether I
wasn't thinking, and I realized that the "watching" was itself a form o
Ann, it would be interesting to hook up to EEG apparatus some people who are
blanking and compare their brain waves to people practicing TM. And just for
fun, let's throw in some people practicing mindfulness!
On Monday, March 3, 2014 11:46 PM, "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
---
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Exactly right. To call transcending an "experience" confuses the issue when
you get down to the nitty-gritty. I don't think it's "gobbledygook semantics,"
it's just that we don't have a language
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Exactly right. To call transcending an "experience" confuses the issue when
you get down to the nitty-gritty. I don't think it's "gobbledygook semantics,"
it's just that we don't have a language of transcendence, so we often have to
go through s
Exactly right. To call transcending an "experience" confuses the issue when you
get down to the nitty-gritty. I don't think it's "gobbledygook semantics," it's
just that we don't have a language of transcendence, so we often have to go
through semantic contortions.
You make an excellent point
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Maharishi said that everyone passes through transcendence as they go from one
state of consciousness to another (waking to dreaming to sleeping and back
again). He probably would not have recomm
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Maharishi said that everyone passes through transcendence as they go from one
state of consciousness to another (waking to dreaming to sleeping and back
again). He probably would not have recommended trying to hold one's awareness
in that in-bet
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Re Ann's "The transition between waking and sleeping is not transcendence in
my book. It is full of thoughts and awareness that do not feel transcendental
at all.": So you are *not* doing what Maharshi says. You have to hold your
awareness at t
On 3/3/2014 6:32 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> Really? Most all mantras cause physiological change. Your statement
> happens to also throw out a lot of TM research.
>
There are no double-blind scientific studies that prove the mind can
alter a physical object at will. If that were possible, it would be
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
