--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
The third eye is the portal to infinity, that's why it's
important!
Unfolding of the chakras unfold powers of morality, self control,
chastity,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, I assume that intentional transcending is
actually a different physical state than spontaneous
transcending, and that the former is an illusion,
while the latter is based on a simple physical change
in how
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sahadeva=coccyx center=restraint (muladhara chakra)
sahadeva (%{saha4-}) mfn. *with the gods*[emph. added] MBh. BhP. ; m.
N. of a R2shi (with the patr. %{vArSAgira}) RV. i , 107 ; of a man
(with the patr. %{zAJjaya})
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
Of course, I assume that intentional transcending is
actually a different physical state than spontaneous
transcending, and that the former is an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 no_reply@ wrote:
Sahadeva=coccyx center=restraint (muladhara chakra)
sahadeva (%{saha4-}) mfn. *with the gods*[emph. added] MBh. BhP. ; m.
N. of a R2shi (with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
Of course, I assume that intentional transcending is
actually a different physical
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, the idea that the Pandavas represen 5 virtues ala Raja
Yoga is impossible. They
have to represent 5 chakras even though Chakra is never mentioned
in the Gita or the
Yoga Sutras
Well, actually it is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And according to Taimni, hRraya (heart) in III 35 refers
to anaahata-cakra (an-aahata):
Bhoja's comment on that suutra:
hRdayaM shariirasya pradesha-visheSas tasminn adhomukha-svalpa-
puNDariikaabhyantare
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@
wrote:
Of course, I
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TurquoiseB wrote:
Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic stuff he
DOES consider important?
Maharishi mentions marmas, and not chakras.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
Of course, I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ wrote:
And according to Taimni, hRraya (heart) in III 35 refers
to anaahata-cakra (an-aahata):
Bhoja's comment on that suutra:
hRdayaM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
Of course, the idea that the Pandavas represen 5 virtues ala Raja
Yoga is impossible. They
have to represent 5 chakras even though Chakra is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
TurquoiseB wrote:
Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic stuff he
DOES consider
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel babajii_99@
wrote:
(snip)
I take that back. The mention of chakra appears to be
descriptive
rather than prescriptive
(to use Judy's phrase), and there is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I stand corrected. He appears to refer to brahmi shakti as the
cosmic creative intelligence
aka Mother Divine.
http://is1.mum.edu/vedicreserve/vedant.htm
Rk Veda 1.158.6
Translation: For those () established in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 no_reply@ wrote:
remember what Christ said, no man cometh unto the Father
(Brahman) but thru meie. thur the all seeing 'third' eye.
Yep, I'm sure that is what
Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic stuff he
DOES consider important?
Maharishi mentions marmas, and not chakras.
In all fairness to MMY, I don't think he wanted to open a pandora's
box
with this more esoteric stuff, who knows, I may not be a meditator now
if
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic
stuff he DOES consider important?
Maharishi mentions marmas, and not chakras.
In all fairness to MMY, I don't think he wanted to open
a pandora's
When I spent some time with Brahmachari Sattyanand he gave me an
advanced technique which involves paying attention to the mantra in a
particular location. Being in India, with an Indian, in an Indian
ashram, I asked him if he meant in the vicinity of the soso chakra,
but he soon made it very
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
Yup, he secularized a lot of the stuff. For instance, creative
intelligence for shakti.
I don't think he uses creative intelligence as a translation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic stuff he
DOES consider important?
Maharishi mentions marmas, and not chakras.
In all fairness to MMY, I don't think he wanted to open a pandora's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I spent some time with Brahmachari Sattyanand he gave me an
advanced technique which involves paying attention to the mantra in a
particular location. Being in India, with an Indian, in an Indian
ashram, I asked
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
Yup, he secularized a lot of the stuff. For instance, creative
intelligence for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic
stuff he
DOES consider important?
Maharishi mentions marmas, and not chakras.
In the
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu
noozguru@ wrote:
Yup, he secularized a lot of the stuff.
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I spent some time with Brahmachari Sattyanand
he gave me an
advanced technique which involves paying attention
to the mantra in a
particular location. Being in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
premanandpaul@ wrote:
When I spent some time with Brahmachari Sattyanand
he gave me an
advanced technique which
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When I spent some time with Brahmachari Sattyanand he gave me an
advanced technique which involves paying attention to the mantra
in a particular location.
Me, too.
Being in India, with an Indian, in an Indian
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason premanandpaul@
wrote:
When I spent some time with Brahmachari Sattyanand he gave me an
advanced technique which involves paying attention to the mantra in a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
[I quoted from Wikipedia:]
In Hinduism and in some related Asian cultures, a chakra is
thought to be a nexus of metaphysical and/or biophysical energy
residing in the human body
MMY calls these marmas and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup, he secularized a lot of the stuff. For instance, creative
intelligence for shakti.
I think you hit the nail on the head, MMY simplified everything and
made it more appealing to a world wide audience..hence you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haven't any of you guys considered the obvious?
He doesn't speak about chakras (and thousands
of other spiritual subjects) because he doesn't
know anything about them.
Ha, haI enjoyed this and your posts below, I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Before anyone freaks out and considers this
anti-TM, it's not.
snip
If you think I'm wrong about this, try to
remember when he *has* talked about other spir-
itual traditions, like the times he's conveyed
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
snip
Before anyone freaks out and considers this
anti-TM, it's not.
snip
Why, *of course* it's not anti-TM (or anti-MMY).
How could anybody think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
snip
Before anyone freaks out and considers this
anti-TM, it's not.
snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
What the hell is this third eye and why do you think it is important?
The third eye is the portal to infinity, that's why it's important!
Unfolding of the chakras unfold powers of morality, self control,
chastity,
TurquoiseB wrote:
Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic stuff he
DOES consider important?
Maharishi mentions marmas, and not chakras.
In all fairness to MMY, I don't think he wanted to open a pandora's
box
with this more esoteric stuff, who knows, I
MMY calls these marmas and thinks there are about 108 of them
IIRC. Of these 3 are most important.
107 as I recall from working with an indian who trained for many years
in the tradition that maintains the knowledge of marmas in southern
India. Danur Veda. And one hidden one. (thus 108)
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?
on 9/3/06 2:19 PM, Bhairitu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haven't any of you guys considered the obvious?
He doesn't speak about chakras (and thousands
of other spiritual subjects) because he
--- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 9/3/06 2:19 PM, Bhairitu at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haven't any of you guys considered the
obvious?
He doesn't speak about chakras (and thousands
of other spiritual subjects) because he
doesn't
know anything about them.
If
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote:
--- sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
premanandpaul@ wrote:
When I spent some time with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
premanandpaul@ wrote:
When I spent some time with Brahmachari Sattyanand
he gave me an
advanced technique which
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason premanandpaul@
wrote:
When I spent some time with Brahmachari Sattyanand he gave me an
advanced
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
snip
Before anyone freaks out and considers this
anti-TM, it's not.
snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
snip
What the hell is this third eye and why do you think it is important?
The third eye is the portal to infinity, that's why it's important!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MMY calls these marmas and thinks there are about 108 of them
IIRC. Of these 3 are most important.
107 as I recall from working with an indian who trained for many years
in the tradition that maintains the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TurquoiseB wrote:
Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic stuff he
DOES consider important?
Maharishi mentions marmas, and not chakras.
In all fairness to MMY, I don't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 9/3/06 2:19 PM, Bhairitu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haven't any of you guys considered the obvious?
He doesn't speak about chakras (and thousands
of other spiritual subjects) because he doesn't
know
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The third eye is the portal to infinity, that's why it's
important!
Unfolding of the chakras unfold powers of morality, self control,
chastity, descrimination, etc. That is why we meditate, and the
unfolding of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've only been meditating for 37 years (TM govenor/Siddha...in poor
standing)and don't really know...any takers? BillyG.
(previous subject line cut off)
Hi, I think yes, it probably is, though I had such an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 no_reply@ wrote:
I've only been meditating for 37 years (TM govenor/Siddha...in poor
standing)and don't really know...any takers? BillyG.
(previous subject line
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 no_reply@
wrote:
I've only been meditating for 37 years (TM govenor/Siddha...in
poor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Not sure I understand all of what you said-
all I can say is that when the third eye opens (a very weird
expression by the way...) the ability is gained to see all manner of
things without the optic machinery of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
Not sure I understand all of what you said-
all I can say is that when the third eye opens (a very weird
expression by the way...) the ability
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indians in general speak of the third eye open (kundalini has
risen)
as a sign of enlightenment.
And what does MMY say?
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
Not sure I understand all of what you said-
all I can say is that when the third eye opens (a very weird
expression by the way...) the ability
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, I'm sure that is what Christ meant: me = 3rd eye.
Yes, as Christ is *the only begotten* of the Father and is God immanent
IN creation (formless Christ or Buddhic plane of consciousness, the one
life, the one soul)
wmurphy77 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indians in general speak of the third eye open (kundalini has
risen)
as a sign of enlightenment.
And what does MMY say?
Like others have mentioned here I never heard him speak of
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
Not sure I understand all of what you said-
all I can say is that when the third eye opens
(a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And what does MMY say?
Like others have mentioned here I never heard him speak of the
chakras.
It's not that the information isn't important though.
I'm not sure why MMY does not mention opening of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wmurphy77 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
Indians in general speak of the third eye open (kundalini has
risen)
as a sign of enlightenment.
And
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wmurphy77 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
Indians in general speak of the third eye open (kundalini has
risen)
as a sign of enlightenment.
And
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
And what does MMY say?
Like others have mentioned here I never heard him speak of the
chakras.
It's not that the information isn't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
wmurphy77 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
Indians in general speak of the third eye open (kundalini has
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
snip
Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic stuff he
DOES consider
wmurphy77 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And what does MMY say?
Like others have mentioned here I never heard him speak of the
chakras.
It's not that the information isn't important though.
I'm not sure why MMY
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
snip
Or perhaps
jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wmurphy77 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
Indians in general speak of the third eye open (kundalini has
risen)
as a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
snip
Or perhaps
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Quick google search yields little about chakras as spiritual
thingies. There are wheels
mentioned, but not spiritual nexi specifical called chakras. This
appears to be a Tibetan
Buddhist term,
?
In Hinduism
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
wmurphy77 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
Indians in general
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wmurphy77 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
And what does MMY say?
Like others have mentioned here I never heard him speak of the
chakras.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
wmurphy77 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@
wrote:
Indians in general
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@
wrote:
snip
Or perhaps
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
snip
Quick google search yields little about chakras as spiritual
thingies. There are wheels
mentioned, but not spiritual nexi specifical called
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
snip
Quick google search yields little about chakras as spiritual
thingies. There are wheels
mentioned, but not spiritual nexi specifical called
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wmurphy77 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
And what does MMY say?
Like others have mentioned here I never heard him speak of
jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
wmurphy77 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
wmurphy77 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
snip
Quick google search yields little about chakras as spiritual
thingies. There are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
wmurphy77 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
And what does MMY
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
wmurphy77 wrote:
(snip)
I take that back. The mention of chakra appears to be descriptive
rather than prescriptive
(to use Judy's phrase), and there is much of interest in this
upanishad for those who think
TM is important rather than thinking that you gotta attend to each
individual leaf (or
chakra).
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(snip)
I take that back. The mention of chakra appears to be descriptive
rather than prescriptive
(to use Judy's phrase), and there is much of interest in this
upanishad for those who think
TM is important
86 matches
Mail list logo
